He doesn’t seem to have been kidding, either. This is the level of willful ignorance and incompetence among European elites. They all need to be replaced. Why? In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. Apparently Maassen and his colleagues thought they were issuing an empty boast.
“German Intelligence Chief Makes Surprising Admission: Analysts Didn’t Expect Terrorists to Sneak Into Europe With Migrants,” by Sharona Schwartz, The Blaze, April 12, 2016:
The head of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency said in an interview published Sunday that security officials had misjudged the Islamic State group’s ambition to sneak terrorists into Germany under the guise of asylum seekers.
In an interview with the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag, Hans-Georg Maassen, head of Germany’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, or BfV, admitted there had been a “misjudgment” regarding the Islamist group’s strategy.
Intelligence officials at first believed it was unlikely that terrorists would enter Germany among migrants, he said.
“We thought that the risk was simply too high,” Maassen said according to quotes translated by DW. “Although they did not need to mix their people among the refugees, they did it.”
He described the infiltration strategy as “a show of force.”
The intelligence chief made another surprising admission – that some 70 percent of refugees entering Germany did not arrive with a valid passport and have been registered based solely on the information they provided.
“I am concerned that we (the BfV) and our partner agencies may, in fact, have information about dangerous individuals saved in our databases. However, we might fail to notice that they are here because they enter with false identities,” he said.
Maassen called the security situation in Germany “very serious” given that the Islamic State group aims to carry out attacks. At the same time, he said he had no knowledge of a concrete attack plan.
His remarks came after the Islamic State released a video last week threatening London, Berlin and Rome.
He estimated that there are some 1,100 Islamists in Germany who could pose a terrorist threat.…

WestDivide says
WOW! You gotta be kidding me!
Does no one in EU system read history? Pretty much tells ya where their priorities lie, doesn’t it!!!
-West
Westman says
Merkel & Hans-Georg Maassen should both put on dunce caps and go sit in the corner.
Anne Smith says
More bad news coming down the t rack. The liberal elite now want Merkel to put her hat in the ring for the Secretary General of UN job which is up for grabs.
linnte says
Anne, I have heard Obama wants this position too! I think I heard it on Alex Jones radio. I guess I won’t hold my breath for either one. But the majority of countrys in the UN are Muslim so I guess those Muslims will show us who has been doing the most Muslim ass kissing won’t they?
Polk1970 says
“Intelligence officials at first believed it was unlikely that terrorists would enter Germany among migrants, he said”
BREATHTAKING
Are they just fools or did they cook intelligence to please Merkel?
WOW!
Joe says
I’m betting that they are retro-cooking the ‘intelligence’ to let Merkel off the hook for what is coming next….
mortimer says
The German elites are cultural Marxists who have lazily not bothered to read the Sira, hadiths, Koran, Islamic history, canonical commentaries or Sharia law, and yet, preposterously, they consider themselves to be experts on Islam. How can that be?
Their failure to fully inform themselves about Islam amounts to culpable negligence.
Because of their culpable negligence, they should be fired and those with an acquaintance with the above documents should be hired to bring sense to policy about Muslims.
Not to do that is suicidal.
Joe says
Indeed. Future criminal trials for criminal culpable negligence are not outside the realm of possibility either. When the trouble really starts, the public will be in no mood to be nice.
Mira says
Is this guy Maseen coled a inteligent person?how did he get this job?can someone look into this man’s life biography, there is something fishy about him and the rest of “German Inteligencia ” a any person with a 50+ineligence would never come to such stupid consequences.
TrueDutch says
Interesting point about IQ. There’s clear evidence linking low IQ (80-95), violence, and consanguinity. Where do these three things coalesce? Why, among Muslims, of course! Consanguinity was banned in Europe by Pope Gregory 1, and is yet another example of the superiority of the West.
Peter says
Really? What did they think they would? Apply for visas, and state the true purpose of their travels to Europe: “business and pleasure” – bringing the “peace” of Islam and slaughtering infidels?
Bill says
I believe this to be a bald-faced lie. The German government wanted this to happen. Their actions, even to this day, demonstrate that. Their cover up of the atrocities in Cologne and elsewhere is evidence of that. The European Socialist elite have used this manufactured crisis to criminalize the speech of their political opposition and as a pretext to use military and police force to subdue the opposition. They have been more brutal in the treatment of their political opposition than the treatment of the very terrorists that they have ushered into their country. This much should be plain to even a casual observer. Maassen is being set up to take the fall in the same way that the Cologne police chief was cashiered to deflect attention from the ugly truth of the cover up of the pro-Jihad policies of the ruling Cologne political elite. Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, England, France — it is all the same.
Kepha says
You are probably right.
Myxlplik says
Any equation which ends up with large numbers of Muslims in the West = lose for humanity. Any other plan is lose too if this is included in the outcome. I think any fancy plan will fail, best to keep it simple.
joe wysocki says
yes, my friends, they are that stupid
Polk1970 says
Maybe Germany would have been better off ,after reunification, to have employed former Stasi ,without their former tactics
Charli Main says
“He estimated that there are some 1,100 Islamists in Germany who could pose a terrorist threat.”
who could pose a terrorist threat ??????? Another Alice in Wonderland resident of La La Land.
The whole raison d´etre of islamists is to rape, murder and terrorise infidels.
Jay Boo says
German incompetence 72 Munich Olympics
Déjà vu
Walter Sieruk says
Of course,the terrible reality is the some of those Muslim migrants who have entered into Europe might be Muslim terrorists. Those Muslim terrorists who have brutal murderous intentions in the violent and deadly militant jihad are putting in the practice the violence and killing that is instructed in the Koran for the cause of Islam.. To give just a few of the many examples of this from the Koran are 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. 47:4. Those it’s very fitting have a good view of the whole picture and origin of the Koran. For a more full understanding of the actual nature of the Koran a person need to look back in time before the coming of Muhammad and then the Koran. Back to the First Century AD which was the time of early Christian church. For the Early Christian Church had and now in modern times the Christian church still has the Gospel of Christ, First Corinthians 15:1-4. Much later, in time, came Muhammad and he gave much information, that many believe to be divine, some of which is said to have been obtained from an angle from heaven. This information was written down on different objects and things Those written words in different objects was then compiled together and then eventually went into the composition of what is now called the Koran, As some also call it the Qur’an. The Koran is actually, that is in reality, another gospel, apart and greatly different from the Gospel of the Christian Church. Such a thing was predicted in the Bible. For the Bible does warn about those who will come and offer to people another gospel other than the one shown above, First Corinthians 15:1-4. For it is warned about any other “gospel” in the Bible. For it is written in the Bible “Though we or an angle from heaven preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so I say now again, if any man preaches any other gospel unto you than ye have received, let him be accursed.” Galatians 1:8, 9. [K.J.V.] Therefore, the Koran is the result of the deception of a false prophet, Mathew 7:15., who may have come in contact wait a fallen angle, a demon, So the imams and mullahs who preach it a truth to other are accused of and by God.
Rosalinda says
Walter Sieruk, Indeed that is the question of the day. Why did anyone ever believe that the so-called private revelations as recorded in the Koran were of divine origin? God always backs up His prophets with signs and wonders we call miracles. People witness the power of God and are converted because they are moved by these signs.
Jesus was continually and repeatedly confirmed by His Father to be His Beloved Son. His life, death and resurrection were all foretold in the Holy Bible and He alone fulfilled all the prophecies, including His very death on the Cross as the Suffering Servant foretold in Isaiah 53; Psalm22. Jesus preached mercy, compassion and forgiveness. It always impressed me how even when He was being led to a humiliating, brutal execution He stooped down to heal the ear of the slave whose ear Peter had struck with a sword. (Luke 22:51) It takes great strength to be merciful. Any bully armed with a sword can bully and butcher. Only the perfect God and perfect man would have had enough love to bend down, at that moment, to stretch out His healing hand. Jesus used it as a teaching moment.
martti_s says
How do you get to be an analyst? Seems like a fun job!
merkel the female dog says
nah! he’s just pretending to be an idiot.
he’s just defending the old hag merkel
Keith says
Now that the European elites have cocked up so badly what are they going to do about it? Silly question really we know they will use the law to shut up anyone who criticises Islam of course.
Bill says
For starters, there is that German comedian/satirist who recently “insulted” Turkish President Erdogan. The comedian could face up to 5 years in German prison. Not sure yet if Merkel will prosecute, but Eddogan is demanding it. Merkel has publicly apologized for the comedian’s statements (even though she had nothing to do with it). Some might even say she has cravenly bowed as a supplicant to Erdogan. That sounds about right. In any case, this comedian will likely face her wrath (unless some offended Jihadi gets to him first, Charlie Hebdo style). I am sure that the German elite would prefer that outcome rather than to have to soil their own hands. Is it unreasonable to speculate that they might even facilitate it. Why not?
Keith says
Too true, they could very well facilitate it, just by making sure that it is known exactly where he is and ensuring that no police are in the area. Wouldn’t be surprising.
gravenimage says
Bill wrote:
For starters, there is that German comedian/satirist who recently “insulted” Turkish President Erdogan. The comedian could face up to 5 years in German prison. Not sure yet if Merkel will prosecute, but Eddogan is demanding it.
……………………
I’d missed this story, Bill:
“German comedian could face jail for insulting Erdogan”
http://www.thelocal.de/20160406/german-comedian-could-face-jail-for-insulting-erdogan
This is completely insane. In the US you can spoof public figures–it is only believable slander that can be prosecuted. Anything by a comedian would be fair game.
Many heads of state *need* to be insulted. The idea that it is a crime to insult Erdogan, or Kim Jong Un, or al Baghdadi is just madness. We make fun of these last two all the time here in the states.
Jan Böhmermann is standing up for freedom of speech–I hope Germans stand with him!
JMB says
I think we have all observed that there are 2 types of people in this world, namely the thick skins and the thin skins. The thick skins are very involved in public life in white western nations. Insults and satire are all part of our robust political debate.
The thin skins are found in the leadership ranks in Africa, Asia and the Islamic world. The, the slightest insult can lead to a death sentence or an international incident where our spineless white leaders will grovel and apologize profusely.
D says
If they’re willing to commit suicide bombings then there is no risk they’re afraid of. They should have thought of that.
David says
Sad! And I would have never believed it could actually happen. But, my bible study group is right. We are living in “The Last Days”. Islam and Muslim hate cults. Raging around the world. Raping and slaughtering the innocent. Both men, women and even babies.
This is surely the work of Satan and his followers (the muslims!)
The vile cult of penis worship founded by the Demon possessed Mohammed is now THE MAJOR threat to the very survival of civilization.
But for the intervention of GOD none will survive this period of tribulation. I’ve never been a religious person, but I can see the truth all around me every day.
I guess we should all rejoice because it does mean that the real King will soon return!
sham says
#Raping and slaughtering the innocent. ……
The word “Islam” is closely related to the word “salam or silm” which means peace. Muhammad, sallallahu alayhe wa sallam, himself had a very peaceful nature, was extremely tolerant, and highly protective of the non-Muslim minorities living in the Muslim state.
However, there are times when states find war inevitable, but Islam only permits war in specific and dire circumstances. It keeps warfare at a level of mercy and respect for the enemy that no other army has been able to reach. The Prophet sometimes had to fight for the mere survival of his people and message, but once their security was ensured, he immediately reverted to peace and diplomacy.
There is a rigid code Muslims must abide by in deciding when they can fight and how the fighting should be conducted. War itself is despised, and is only a last-resort option when all other attempts at peace have been made.
A Muslim is never allowed to initiate hostilities. “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but transgress not the limits. Surely, Allah likes not the transgressors.” [2: 190].
The only times in which believers are allowed to take up arms are when they are defending their own lives and the lives of their people, when they see the weak being oppressed in acts of tyranny, and when they are prohibited from practicing their religion:
“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.” [2: 191].
“They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing. And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can. And whoso be cometh a renegade and dieth in his disbelief: such are they whose works have fallen both in the world and the Hereafter, Such are rightful owners of the Fire: they will abide therein,” [2:217].
Aside from these circumstances, there is no legitimate fighting in Islam.
The Prophet (p) stoned a man who had raped a woman. This is reported in Jami` at-Tirmidhi. The chapter of the narration goes like, “woman who is forced To commit adultery” i.e., rape:
“A women went out during the time of the Prophet to go to Salat, but she was caught by a man and he had relations with her, so she screamed and he left. Then a man came across her and she said: ‘That man has done this and that to me’, then she came across a group of Emigrants (Muhajirin) and she said: ‘That man did this and that to me.’ They went to get the man she thought had relations with her, and they brought him to her. She said: ‘Yes, that’s him.’ So they brought him to the Messenger of Allah, and when he ordered that he be stoned, the man who had relations with her, said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I am the one who had relations with her.’ So he said to her: ‘Go, for Allah has forgiven you.’ Then he said some nice words to the man (who was brought). And he said to the man who had relations with her: ‘Stone him.’ Then he said: ‘He has repented a repentance that, if the inhabitants of Al-Madinah had repented with, it would have been accepted from them.’” (Jami’ at-Tirmidhi volume 3, Book 15, Hadith 1454 [Hadith is Hasan – Darrusalaam])
Jay Boo says
sallallahu alayhe wa sallam ?????
linnte says
Excellent!!!
Paul says
The 28,129 jihadi attacks since 9/11 alone have nothing to do
with islam either? You’re not trying to educate the many islamist
groups out there on their supposed misunderstandings, but you
come on here in order to patronise people and piss them off.
You know you’re wrong, you know that we know you’re wrong.
You’re just doing it for the sake of annoyance.
Yawn.
mortimer says
Sham wrote: “Raping and slaughtering the INNOCENT”
You are saying that ‘raping and slaughtering the GUILTY’ is approved by Islam. That is correct.
Summary of the Rape Trial of General Khalid ibn Walid:
Khalid ibn Walid was the greatest general of early Islam under Mohammed and then Caliph Abu Bakr. During the great Arabian Apostasy War, Khalid was sent to suppress rebellion against the caliphate and force former Muslims to pay taxes. Khalid arrested the rebel Malik, declared him a rebel and an apostate and ordered his execution. Thereupon, he raped Malik’s widow, Layla bint al-Minhal. This rape created controversy, though it is what Mohammed did himself. Some officers of his army believed that Khalid killed Malik to take his wife. Once back in Medina, Khalid was called by Caliph Abu Bakr to explain himself. ‘Umar told Khalid: “You enemy of Allâh! You killed a Muslim man and thereafter took his wife. By Allâh, I will stone you”.
Abu Bakr dismissed the complaint of rape by deciding that raping the widow was licit (mubaa) on the grounds that Malik had left Islam. This shows that Sham’s ideas were rejected by Abu Bakr and that raping kafir women at war with Islam is normative Islam, rather than an aberration.
Caliph Abu Bakr knew Islam better than Sham. Sham’s arguments are refuted.
Porky The Crusader says
Putain de Tarée! Asylum for fools exist for guys like you.
gravenimage says
More spam from sham:
#Raping and slaughtering the innocent. …
…………………………..
Of course, no Infidel–or any Muslim deemed “insufficiently Islamic” and declared “Takfir”–is regarded as innocent, and so may be raped and murdered to Muslims’ hearts’ content. sham hopes we don’t know that.
More:
The word “Islam” is closely related to the word “salam or silm” which means peace.
…………………………..
Islam actually means submission, not peace.
More:
Muhammad, sallallahu alayhe wa sallam, himself had a very peaceful nature, was extremely tolerant, and highly protective of the non-Muslim minorities living in the Muslim state.
…………………………..
Grimly laughable.
The “Prophet” Muhammad was a war lord, caravan raider, pedophile, slaver, rapist, and mass murderer.
As for his treatment of non-Muslims, he once had up to 900 unarmed captive Jews beheaded–after which he enslaved their women and children.
Now we know what Muslims consider “tolerant”.
More:
However, there are times when states find war inevitable, but Islam only permits war in specific and dire circumstances…
…………………………..
Are there any Infidels not living under the Islamic heel? Time for war!
More:
It keeps warfare at a level of mercy and respect for the enemy that no other army has been able to reach.
…………………………..
Just grotesque. Was there ever a Muslim Marshall Plan? When the free West has to fight, we fight only until the enemy stops attacking us.
Muslims don’t stop until Infidels submit to Islam–as converts, slaves, or as abused dhimmis.
More:
The Prophet sometimes had to fight for the mere survival of his people and message, but once their security was ensured, he immediately reverted to peace and diplomacy.
…………………………..
Uh huh. Here is the true Muslim approach to war, in their own vile “Holy Book”:
Here’s Qur’an 8:67:
“It is not for a prophet to take captives until he makes a great slaughter in the land. Some Muslims desire the commodities of this world, but Allah desires for you the Hereafter. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.”
Clearly, the way Muslims make it to paradise is by butchering Infidels.
And this is Sura “Al Anfal”, which means “Booty”. Only in Islam is there an entire chapter of their holy book devoted to robbing and murdering unbelievers.
More:
There is a rigid code Muslims must abide by in deciding when they can fight and how the fighting should be conducted. War itself is despised, and is only a last-resort option when all other attempts at peace have been made.
A Muslim is never allowed to initiate hostilities. “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but transgress not the limits. Surely, Allah likes not the transgressors.”
…………………………..
Just grimly laughable. We see every day how “rigid” this code is, as Muslim wage violent Jihad all over the world, and that it involves blowing up shoppers, burning down churches, murdering school children, and cutting the throats of babes-in-arms.
As for “initiating hostilities”, Muslims consider any Infidels not under Islamic law to be “waging war against Allah and his apostle”.
Muslims refer to any Infidel land as part of Dar-al-Harb, which translates to the “house of war”.
More:
The only times in which believers are allowed to take up arms are when they are defending their own lives and the lives of their people, when they see the weak being oppressed in acts of tyranny, and when they are prohibited from practicing their religion:
“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.” [2: 191].
…………………………..
Of course, for Muslims a significant part of “practicing their religion” is oppressing Infidels. If Infidels are resisting such persecution, even passively, they must be slaughtered.
And “persecution” is, in the original, actually “Fitnah”. Fitnah just means disbelief–as long as there are free Infidels, it is worse than slaughter as Muslims see it.
More:
“They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing. And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can. And whoso be cometh a renegade and dieth in his disbelief: such are they whose works have fallen both in the world and the Hereafter, Such are rightful owners of the Fire: they will abide therein,” [2:217].
…………………………..
Once again, sham reveals what Islam is all about–merely to disbelieve in ‘Allah’ is grounds for murder and war.
More:
Aside from these circumstances, there is no legitimate fighting in Islam.
…………………………..
So as long as you are not an Infidel, “heretic”, other-sect Muslim, “apostate”, or “insufficiently Islamic”, you are perfectly safe…
More:
The Prophet (p) stoned a man who had raped a woman. This is reported in Jami` at-Tirmidhi. The chapter of the narration goes like, “woman who is forced To commit adultery” i.e., rape:
“A women went out during the time of the Prophet to go to Salat, but she was caught by a man and he had relations with her, so she screamed and he left. Then a man came across her and she said: ‘That man has done this and that to me’, then she came across a group of Emigrants (Muhajirin) and she said: ‘That man did this and that to me.’ They went to get the man she thought had relations with her, and they brought him to her. She said: ‘Yes, that’s him.’ So they brought him to the Messenger of Allah, and when he ordered that he be stoned, the man who had relations with her, said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I am the one who had relations with her.’ So he said to her: ‘Go, for Allah has forgiven you.’ Then he said some nice words to the man (who was brought). And he said to the man who had relations with her: ‘Stone him.’ Then he said: ‘He has repented a repentance that, if the inhabitants of Al-Madinah had repented with, it would have been accepted from them.’” (Jami’ at-Tirmidhi volume 3, Book 15, Hadith 1454 [Hadith is Hasan – Darrusalaam])
…………………………..
Why does sham think we will be impressed with barbaric *stoning*? What a savage.
Charli Main says
Trying to reason with sham and show him the blatant stupidity of his comments is like trying to reason with a pre-programmed robot.
Hope says
sham, why do you even bother?
Phobic-ist says
This ‘admission’ just makes my blood boil! The crass behaviour of those that are incorrectly termed the ‘elites’ just serves to underline how far the Marxist left have infected the West that they so loathe. No-one asked me or mine whether the country I love (England) could be invaded by seventh century savages. What do the left hope to achieve, other than the destruction of arguably the most successful and peaceable society in history? God damn them and their fellow travellers!
mortimer says
Phobicist wrote: “What do the left hope to achieve”
The destruction of European civilization and Muslims are motivated and revved up to do just that.
Timothius says
How naive of the EU.
K. from Germany says
Is there such a concept that stupidity can reach a degree where it is punishable by law? One can say that in a democracy you get what you deserve as you voted for it, but we all know that the occupation of these leadership posts are not the result of a democratic process. Yet the populace has to bear the consequences. Hence there should be ways of retribution. Heck, I’d sacrifice and take this idiot behind the barn and shoot him, given half a chance.
mortimer says
K. from Germany asked if such monumental stupidity … “is punishable by law?”
No…but it should be punishable, especially when the ruling elites pigheadedly fail to do proper diligence in learning about the possible adverse effects of their decisions and fail to read Islamic history.
In a democracy, VOTERS CAN punish stupidity by boycotting the political party that caused the damage and voting for a more rational policy. German should send Merkel’s party into oblivion unless they want to commit national suicide!
K…I hope you did not vote for Merkel! If I were a German, I would work for the Alternative für Deutschland, AfD to form the next government.
Angemon says
This is not even dereliction of duty, it’s pure, simple incompetence.
Oh, you thought “the risk was too high”, did you? Even after they boldly said last year they would do just that. Ignorant jackass. Why would the risk be too high? It’s not like each so-called “syrian” “refugee” can be vetted, and they know it. Even the handful you can vet, you can only check for known criminals. What about people with no criminal record? How can you tell if they’re ISIS supporters or not?
No, the risk was not “too high”. Much to the contrary. Plus, you do know what drives this people, right? Even if the risk was indeed too high, they’d go “I’m a good muslim. Allah can do anything. Allah rewards good muslims. Ergo, allah will allow me do the impossible”. But that’s not even the crux of it. If you can’t even reason that “well, the risk is too high for them, but they stand to profit immensely if they do pass their members as refugees so we should be on the lookout for it” you’re simply incompetent and you have no business, or the capacity to, protecting a doghouse from fleas, let alone a whole nation from invaders who wish to destroy it.
Exactly. Again, ignorance of what makes them tick. And it doesn’t bode well on you that you failed to account for it.
Well, what did you expect it would happen? You know, with Greece being flooded with “syrian” “refugees” and Germany (among others) looking the other way, when not outright chiding Greece? Do you think Greece, a country going through a monumental economic crisis (which, BTW, they blame on Germany) has the means and resources to properly vet (which, as I wrote above, can’t be done) hundreds of thousand, if not millions, of people who just want to get out of there and go to Germany ASAP? That you failed to include that in your calculations is proof of your incompetence.
Wait, you mean that ISIS terrorists aren’t honest and upfront about who they are? Gee, who could have seen that coming and accounted for it? Surely not an incompetent hack.
You mean, like what happened in Cologne, and the reports of “syrian” “refugees” raping and robbing the local populace? Or are you specifically referring to Paris and Brussels style attacks? Oh, silly me, according to law enforcement New Year’s Eve in
Cologne was a calm, uneventful night.
How did you arrive at that number? How can you assure us that it’s not, for example, 50% of the “syrian” “refugees” Germany took so far? Or 100%?
You know what I think it happened? When ISIS said, last year, they would flood Europe with “refugees” and hide their members among them, left-aligned parties were quick to say “they want us to fear them and change our ways. Well, we won’t”. And when reasonable, sane, non-leftist (but I repeat myself) people – like, for example, PEGIDA – said something along the lines of “you know, they might just be able to smuggle themselves into Europe posing as refugees, we should do something to prevent it”, the left-aligned parties, in a reflexive spasm of autocratic arrogance and despotic hubris, did their best to spite the people raising that possibility. And what better way to spite them and show them how wrong they are than an open-border, no questions asked policy? “Those racist, bigoted, islamophobic nazi peasants dare to question us? Fine, we’ll rub their faces on ‘syrian’ ‘refugees’ until they choke on it.”
Sam Hawkins says
100 percent in agreement with every word you wrote.
ECAW says
They used false identities? The sneaky bastards. Who would credit it?
dumbledoresarmy says
“Do bears cr*p in the woods?”
Barhebraeus says
Good one. And I didn’t expect bacon to sneak into my BLT.
Paul says
We have a situation where the bloodthirsty jihadis are so much
more reliable and honest than the smug condescending ‘intellectual’
elites in society. They openly state their aims and objectives and
the bleeding heart virtue signalling liberals are like “No. they don’t
really mean it. Let’s take these cuddly people in and give them
a big hug! (well, you lot can. Not us, in our nice safe bourgeois
completely homogeneous surroundings)”. Of course, they don’t
actually say that, but that’s the exact implication. These people
are the bigger danger to us all.
Richard Paulsen says
Germany is swarming with mosques.
nicu says
paid – ” donated ” by Saudi Arabia for being so idiot and get islamisized without fighting back 🙁
Richard Paulsen says
It’s terrible.
gravenimage says
Richard Paulsen wrote:
Germany is swarming with mosques.
…………………….
Not enough, as the Mohammedans see it:
“Islamic Group Plans to Double Number of Mosques in Germany”
http://www.dw.com/en/islamic-group-plans-to-double-number-of-mosques-in-germany/a-2821191
This was from almost ten years ago. I’m not sure how bad things are there now.
SoCalMike says
This sorry pathetic man should commit suicide or at least resign.
Marcel Bérubé says
Not even one year ago ,i didn’t knew so much about Islam. I went on Wikipedia , read about it , took references , went on YT etc… Now, daily , I can see I know more than most of our wester leaders such as Kerry, Cameron, Hollande, Brussels mayors past and present and many peoples in the media : journalists, actors, singers tv shows hosts, columnists. Almost every day now , I write to many of them to tell them 5 or 6 items from Coran or Haddiths . With Islam waht we see is not what we get.
Since so much leaders know so less about islam , it makes me fell insecure.Most of them don’t make the links between the dots.
You all who goes on such forum as Jihad Watch , send facts and their correct interpretations to your local and national medias. Give them links where they can find out by themselves. Some will be interested others will not . You will be a bigot or a an islamophobic to some . So once you know it , go over these peoples and feed others. Dare to put comments on YT videos . You will received bad words suc as : « Hey you stupid idiot » etc.. but they want come to kill you at your house. There are too many peoples now that do the same. they can’t go after every one. They will try to intimidate you. Why ? Because they are intimidate themselves by their families, their friends , the pseudo religion. Islam is not a religion. It is a movement built by califs. They used someone who might have existed but would be the first one to be surprised if he come back today ans see what is done in his name. He never plan that. The Mohamed that islam presents is as true as Robin Hood or King Arthur or Santa Claus . Santa Claus is a good example . He never existed but Saint Nicolas did. Same with Mohamed . Islam is like an onion. You peel it and under a leave there another. One lie cover the next one. If you go to Coran on Wikipedia , you will see a photo of the book and a page of it under U.-V. light. Anyone can see the three colors of ink one over the other. Black over dark blue over light blue and words that are not the same, of course. This Coran is consider an authentic by Islam scholars .
mortimer says
Agree with M.Bérubé. Islam was created by Abd al Malik more than 60 years after Mohammed. Islam was further altered by the caliphs who followed him. The process of creating Islam took 250 years at least.
mortimer says
Quote: “head of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency said … security officials had misjudged the Islamic State”
While Hans-Georg Maassen is making a truthful admission, this lack of competence at the top is not good enough from people who were hired for their high intelligence.
Western elites are blinkered with cultural Marxist thought and so they refuse to consider facts that do not fit in their pre-determined Marxist categories.
The can remove their blinkers by reading Islam’s foundational source texts and jihad manuals and by understanding Islam FROM INSIDE JIHADISM.
At the moment, Western elites foolishly SUPERIMPOSE MARXIST CATEGORIES onto Islam and extract all the wrong conclusions.
This approach is wooden-headed.
mortimer says
Agree with estimate of Hans-Georg Maassen: “1,100 Islamists in Germany who could pose a terrorist threat”
In Europe at present, there are easily 5,000 Muslims who might commit jihad murders if the right leadership were to contact them. If another Osama bin Laden came onto the scene, the number of motivated jihadists in Europe could be 10,000 or 20,000.
What is preventing the number of jihadists in Europe to go that high is merely the absence of a charismatic jihad leader.
nicu says
Is he that dumb – or they just want to keep on lying to us ?
Everybody who warned about exactly that was called a racist and still is !
D-spot says
To quote a couple of my favourite comedians – ‘you can’t fix stupid’ and ‘stupid is as stupid does’ however, very many people will bear the brunt of this incredible lack of ‘intelligence’ by the high priced help – how do these people sleep at night?
marble says
Actually, the migrants sneaked in with the terrorists.
SpiritOf1683 says
Maybe so.
SpiritOf1683 says
Who are these ‘analysts’? It wouldn’t have been beyond the ability of our cat to grasp the fact that terrorists would sneak in alongside the ‘refugees’ er I mean invaders. It just goes to show you don’t need a modicum of common sense to get to the top in thre PC West these days. To have common sense seems to be a detriment and gets you labelled as a bigot and a racist.
gravenimage says
German intel top dog says analysts didn’t expect jihad terrorists to sneak into Europe with migrants
…………………………
D’oh!
Enrico says
Maassen described the infiltration strategy ‘a show of force’.
This is ofcourse ridiculous. What could be more easy these days than to trespass European borders without valid documents?
This is simply pure contempt for the European population and their inability to resist their destruction. If one wants to make carreer in Europe one must intensly hate Europeans and traditional values, seemingly. It is politics, Apostate Rome with Antipope Francis are into this as well and is the demonic component of the destruction of Europe as a Christian civilization.
Bill says
I still do not believe it. They knew full well this was going to happen. They only underestimated the citizen reaction to it. So, they trot out meaningless “oops” statements to distract and blunt the righteous outrage. This is just part of the game.
In the unlikely event that I am wrong and the head of German intelligence is every inch the muttonhead he appears to be, then I guess German intelligence needed all the help it could get from Eric Snowden’s leaks because they are too damned incompetent to figure out anything on their own.
Kepha says
Hans-Georg Maassen needs to tender his resignation about two weeks ago. I’m sure some of the old Stasi officers now living on Bundesrepublik pensions could be very helpful about this time.
Scott says
Spencer I have a question why do you use Facebook when zuckerbergs in with Soros and is one of the guys funding these invasions
Sam says
“German intel top dog says analysts didn’t expect jihad terrorists to sneak into Europe with migrants”
Is this a joke or what? How can anyone in “intelligence” business say a thing like that. But we are dealing with Islam. As a result expect stupidity, misery, terror, mayhem and all the above. NUTS!!!!!!
Georg says
Yes, IS fighters are known for their aversion to risk.
Baucent says
This is what you get from decades of Social Democrat rule whereby politically correct but factually incorrect views of Jihadism and the risk to Western states permeate the security services. The same is going on with the FBI where they actually believe “Islamophobia” is a bigger danger than Islam.
Darrius says
To be honest , I don’t really believe this. I think that the dissenting voices were overlooked for P.C. reasons.
Michael Baker says
He is telling lies they were warned that IS planned to enter into Europe with migrants and form cells in each country of invasion.
Mike Proulx says
Totally agree with you Michael, they know perfectly well what they are doing, they want to create unrest so they can bring in their NWO.
The Word of God warn us of all these things which would come upon the earth in the last days. The will of God is being fulfilled before our very eyes, unless men repent they will perish in everlasting damnation.
Be careful of the Great deception which is being forged by Satan himself, many have been already bit by the serpent and the venom is flowing through their veins.
Believer in Christ
Audrey Humphrey says
Really!!!! and he is head of intelligence in Germany, well fancy owning up to that, the ordinary person in the street (including me) said this from the start of the migrants arriving in countries before reaching Germany. What hope is there with this sort of man holding a top job in the intelligence service. These Jihad terrorist are ruthless, outwitting Merkel and Brussels to further their goal of taking over the world, unless countries wake up to what is going on they will succeed. Stop pandering to them and deal with it in the only language they understand, fight fire with fire.
TheBuffster says
Oh, for heaven’s sake, have the German intelligence people no grasp of war strategy? Exactly *why* would the Islamic State *not* send jihadists – all that they could spare – into Europe?
Perhaps the Germans don’t yet see themselves and their fellow European leadership the way the outside world sees them – as appeasing weaklings who are ready to be had.
That’s surely how the enemy sees them. Plus the enemy has two other things going for them that make them unafraid of risk: 1) Immediate entry into Paradise if they die while committing jihad 2) They have Allah on their side. They have faith that whatever happens, it is Allah’s will and they’re doing their part in his plan.
It’s common sense that IS would take the opportunity to send to Europe as many jihadists as they could spare while the EU is foolish enough to open the gates and let millions stream in. To miss that opportunity would be ridiculous. To have a few thousand covert soldiers in the camp of an appeasing enemy is a dream situation. It gives them leverage. It allows them to break down the sense of security of the unbelieving population while hundreds of thousands to millions of believers lobby for more legal concessions to Sharia.
Once enough Muslims have entered the EU – and I think that level certainly has been reached by now – there will be enough orthodox believers to make them fearless and bold. And I’m not mainly talking about violent jihadis, who are already fearless and bold. I’m talking about the Muslims who aim to go the *legal* jihad route. And with terrorists, many of whom are undoubtedly unknown, ready to strike and make Europeans afraid to stop appeasing Muslims, IS expects to move Europe incrementally into dhimmi status.
To see this, a person has to bother to get into the heads of the enemy by studying their motivating doctrines. To see this, a person has to be willing to look at the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and to do that he has to somehow put aside any ideology of his own that rebels against seeing truths that debunk his own pleasant dreams of peace and multicultural bliss.
I disagree with the people who think that the leaders of Europe want what their getting. I think it’s more likely that they’re driven by their unrealistic political philosophy that has them thinking that it’s necessary to preserve peace and tranquility and brotherhood by being generous and self-abnegating. They’re not driven by some bizarre will to power but by the MUSH in their heads about compassion and brotherhood and cultural equivalence and sharing the wealth and being good to “the other” and proving they’re nothing like the Nazis. Etc.
These people have been blinded by mush.
Did Chamberlain think his appeasing deal with Hitler would lead to war? No. He thought he had sealed a deal for peace in his time. He thought that because he didn’t get what Hitler was. He didn’t know the enemy.
Mush. Fuzz. Wishful thinking. That’s what will enslave us. Or kill us.
Jenny H says
It seems to me that the reason Germany is so vulnerable to being invaded in the way it was last year is because, as a country, it hasn’t recovered from the psychic (psychological) wound it inflicted on itself in World War II. If Germans as a people and Germany as an entity weren’t so desperately afraid of being racist, and to wish to be kind to and accepting of ‘the other’, to counterbalance the actions of the past, there would be much clearer thinking on this matter and an unwillingness to punish themselves to be culturally and maybe literally, murdered.
It also doesn’t help that Christian belief is often ridiculed in popular culture.
Richard Courtemanche says
Politically spinning the issue on behalf of Merkel… German Intel can’t be that inefficient.
Bill says
this guy is either a liar or mentally ill , which is it Masseen ?