The Islamic State will keep advancing until it is stopped by force.
“ISIS threatens attack on India; vows to wipe out Hindus,” DNA India, April 14, 2016 (thanks to Lookmann):
Islamic State (ISIS) has made new threat to send its fighters from Pakistan and Bangladesh to carry out ‘guerrilla attacks’ in India.
In a recent interview carried by Dabiq magazine, the ‘amir’ of ISIS fighters in Bangladesh, Shaykh Abu Ibrahim al-Hanif has vowed to wipe out Hindus and implement ‘sharia’ law in India and Bangladesh. al-Hanif also revealed the terror group is currently training fighters in Bangladesh and Pakistan to launch attacks on India and is seeking the help of the local mujahideen in the country, according to a leading English daily.
The intention behind the attacks, al-Hanif says is to rid India of disbelievers as Muslims are facing trouble because of Hindus. In Dabiq, he has warned Hindus will be their main target in India.
Khalid El-Bakraoui, Ibrahim El-Bakraoui,To establish a caliphate, al-Hanif promises to topple Shiekh Hasina government in Bangladesh. “Bengal is located on the eastern side of India, whereas Wilayat Khurasan is located on its western side. Thus, having a strong jihad base in Bengal will facilitate performing guerrilla attacks inside India simultaneously from both sides and facilitate creating a condition of tawahhush (fear and chaos) in India along with the help of the existing local mujahidin there…,” he is quoted as saying in the magazine.
“This would allow IS fighters to enter with a conventional army and completely liberate the region from the mushrikin (disbelievers), after first getting rid of the ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Afghani’ regimes”, he added.

Angemon says
Good luck with that – you’re going to need it…
Westman says
True. The Islamoprodigy’s delusion knows no bounds of hubris; inventing a new domino theory.
linnte says
Hindus will STAND against this.
A Johnson says
Hindus are not blinkered by Liberal Leftist European idologies. They see Islam for what it is–.
linnte says
I know! Seiks are also a warrior class. They fight with the sword but let’s hope they also have gun collections.
Jerry says
This is what the religious side of islam has produced. It’s an ideology that glorifies terror and murder for the faith. Somehow this fake revelation of god took hold on our planet 1400 years ago and muslims have nurtured it ever since. And now we have a muslim army slaughtering, raping, and destroying, to satisfy the blood lust of that religion’s god and prophet. Hardly a day goes by without some muslim killing or raping for this demonic faith. And then we got millions of “moderate” muslims acting coy about all this, telling us that even though their faith commands the murder and subjugation of infidels it has nothing to with all that real-world murder and subjugation of infidels. Their taqiyya has no limits.
There’s an “islamophobia” video from the local chapter of CAIR in my home state of MN. Of course they are the victims, poor babies. It must really hurt their feelings to have normal, decent people complain about their religion that wants us dead. They never take the time to consider their role in all this, as if normal people aren’t supposed to question the motives of people that live according to a murderous and hateful ideology.
***There are petitions on line to ban sharia and CAIR in this country. I’ve signed them, I hope you do to.
Here’s their vid. If you watch it please shed a tear. But not for them, I mean all the people that have been raped and murdered for the faith they’re importing into our once great nation. At the very least, please vote it DOWN
https://youtu.be/PwJKHR5aDKw
Jerry says
If they can defame the people of my home state with accusations of “islamophobia” then it’s fair I be allowed a rebuttal with the truth about their fascist religion. Free speech works both ways, darlings.
robert saunders says
Just wait till the ISIS boys run into the British-trained, highly sophisticated, Indian military. A good time will be had by all. Well, maybe not all.
linnte says
I agree Robert! And there are Seiks (SP) who will take up the literal sword too!
Zeke Zick says
When the Muslims, aka Moguls, took over most of India they slaughtered close to 1 million Hindus. Hindu Historians describe the streets and cities of India with huge piles of rotting corpses.
Tamerlane, another Jihadi of “The Religion of Pieces”, it is said by some Historians to have murdered 10% of the World’s population at the time or his reign through his Jihad.
Jihad is civilizational war and the sooner Western Leaders figure that out, the better.
mortimer says
The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.
– Will Durant (U.S. Historian)
-Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. (Koenard Elst, Negationism in India)
-K.S. Lal, 1973, estimates 80 million Hindus killed by jihad in 1000 to 1525.
robert says
I was scrolling through the comments waiting for this. By the words of Islamic scholars who recorded the invasion, this was the greatest genocide in human history. Between 70 and 80 million were killed.
I asked a Hindu work colleague about the British in India, and she said, they stopped the Muslim slaughter. I had no idea and read up about it
Hindu American says
Robert,
About the British stopping the Hindu genocide in India, that may be partly true but in their own self-serving interest, the British created their own version of a mini-genocide based on economic and political practices. Probably tens of millions of Indians died. Hey, but they build the railroad. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/24/india.randeepramesh
Recall Churchill’s (racist) attitude towards everything Indian and, as the wartime PM, his refusal to feed starving Indians during WWII when much needed food grains, grown by Indian farmers, were unilaterally diverted to the war effort in Africa and SE Asia thereby starving the Indian populace. The railroad helped transport the grains to various seaports.
stosh777 says
to Hindu American…Churchill may have been racist, but no more so than Gandhi. Read Gandhi’s comments about black Africans from his time in south Africa. Gandhi also told the Jews of Germany to “bare their necks” to the Nazis and opined that eventually Germans would regard Hitler as a good leader. Unlike Gandhi, at least Churchill was not a fool.
linnte says
80 MILLION? I am always astonished about the truths I hear on this blog! Omg! I don’t even know what to say. Wow! I am 62 and have never heard this! It’s not taught in schools. Wow!
robert says
Yes, sadly this is true.
You have to search for the islamic sources fir this. The genocide was not constant, but occurred in waves.
An example is the region called the Hindu kush in Afghanistan. So many were killed there the area was named after it, ie the Hindu kush, again look it up.
Hindus and Buddhists are not offered “protection” by the jizya tax like the Christians and jews, and they can be killed if they refuse to convert.
Some muslin scholars bemoaned the fact that there were just too many Hindus to kill.
The whole topic really does require a book by someone like Robert Spencer
linnte says
I just followed a link from (can’t remember his name) on this blog and see the annihilation happened over 800 years, but still, this is incredible! Still stunned!
gravenimage says
All true, Mortimer. The Muslim invasion and conquest of India was the bloodiest Jihad in history–which is saying a great deal.
sham says
IS ISLAM SPREAD BY SWORD?
It is a common complaint among some non-Muslims that Islam would not have
millions of adherents all over the world, if it had not been spread by the use of
force. The following points will make it clear, that far from being spread by the
sword, it was the inherent force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible
for the rapid spread of Islam.
1. Islam means peace.
Islam comes from the root word ‘salaam’, which means peace. It also means
submitting one’s will to Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is
acquired by submitting one’s will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).
2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.
Each and every human being in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace
and harmony. There are many, who would disrupt it for their own vested
interests. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. It is precisely for
this reason that we have the police who use force against criminals and antisocial
elements to maintain peace in the country. Islam promotes peace. At the
same time, Islam exhorts it followers to fight where there is oppression. The
fight against oppression may, at times, require the use of force. In Islam force
can only be used to promote peace and justice.
3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O’Leary.
The best reply to the misconception that Islam was spread by the sword is given by
the noted historian De Lacy O’Leary in the book “Islam at the cross road” (Page 8):
“History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping
through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races
is one of the most fantastically absurd myth that historians have ever repeated.”
4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.
Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the
sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to
Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who
could openly give the adhan, that is the call for prayers.
5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians.
Muslims were the lords of Arabia for 1400 years. For a few years the British
ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia
for 1400 years. Yet today, there are 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians
i.e. Christians since generations. If the Muslims had used the sword there would
not have been a single Arab who would have remained a Christian.
6. More than 80% non-Muslims in India.
The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had
the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today
more than 80% of the population of India are non-Muslims. All these non-
Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the
sword.
7. Indonesia and Malaysia.
Indonesia is a country that has the maximum number of Muslims in the world.
The majority of people in Malaysia are Muslims. May one ask, “Which Muslim
army went to Indonesia and Malaysia?”
8. East Coast of Africa.
Similarly, Islam has spread rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. One may again
ask, if Islam was spread by the sword, “Which Muslim army went to the East
Coast of Africa?”
9. Thomas Carlyle.
The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book “Heroes and Hero worship”,
refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: “The sword indeed, but
where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in
a minority of one. In one man’s head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man
alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he
takes a sword and try to propagate with that, will do little for him. You must get
your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can.”
10. No compulsion in religion.
With which sword was Islam spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use
it to spread Islam because the Qur’an says in the following verse:
“Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from
error”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]
11. Sword of the Intellect.
It is the sword of intellect. The sword that conquers the hearts and minds of
people. The Qur’an says in Surah Nahl, chapter 16 verse 125:
“Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching;
and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious.”
[Al-Qur’an 16:125]
12. Increase in the world religions from 1934 to 1984.
An article in Reader’s Digest ‘Almanac’, year book 1986, gave the statistics of
the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century
from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in ‘The Plain Truth’ magazine. At
the top was Islam, which increased by 235%, and Christianity had increased
only by 47%. May one ask, which war took place in this century which converted
millions of people to Islam?
13. Islam is the fastest growing religion in America and Europe.
Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing
religion in Europe in Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept
Islam in such large numbers?
Halaku says
Sham, you have such a delightful name! Like all apologists, you predictably overlook the mindless misery and violence that has accompanied Islam throughout history. It has been a handy tool of tyranny and mental degeneration everywhere.
1. The number of Muslims is increasing throughout the world because they do not care about the environment or a better life in this planet, hence they are procreating fast and adding to poverty in every part of the world.
2. In all the countries you have mentioned, including Indonesia and India, Islam was also propagated by violent Jihad.
3. Hindus survived in India, despite the recorded killing over centuries of tens of millions of them by the Jihadis, not because of any basic kindness in Islam, but because they contributed the largest amount of taxes like jiziya. It took the peaceful and fragmented Hindus time to figure out this mad cult and when they got organised like the Marathas and Sikhs, they destroyed the tyranny.
Gbox says
You have wasted your time trying to convince any reader here with your propaganda. We all know the sordid, violent history of Islam, and are wise to your kind of bullsh!t.
Try the Huffington Post, Salon, or the Guardian, where you will find a lot of sympathetic, liberal imbeciles.
David says
History of Islam. Rape murder pedophilia
gravenimage says
The meretricious sham wrote:
IS ISLAM SPREAD BY SWORD?
It is a common complaint among some non-Muslims that Islam would not have
millions of adherents all over the world, if it had not been spread by the use of
force. The following points will make it clear, that far from being spread by the
sword, it was the inherent force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible
for the rapid spread of Islam.
……………………………..
Islam rejects reason and logic, and has been spread by the sword ever since the days of the vicious “Prophet”.
In fact, when Muslims aren’t trying to lull the Infidels into a false sense of security, as here, they glory in their violent creed being spread so often through conquest.
And notice that sham hopes we have forgotten that this article is about his pious coreligionist vowing the genocide of the Hindus.
Does sham have a problem with this? If he does, he certainly does not say so.
More:
1. Islam means peace.
Islam comes from the root word ‘salaam’, which means peace. It also means
submitting one’s will to Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is
acquired by submitting one’s will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).
……………………………..
Islam means submission–submission to the vicious creed of Muhammed.
More:
2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.
Each and every human being in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace
and harmony. There are many, who would disrupt it for their own vested
interests. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. It is precisely for
this reason that we have the police who use force against criminals
……………………………..
What sham will not tell you is that anyone who dares resist the supremacy of Islam–even entirely peacefully–is seen as “waging war against Islam and its ‘Prophet'”, and is hence fail game for murder.
That would include *all* of Dar-al-Harb, which is not under Muslim rule.
More:
and antisocial
elements to maintain peace in the country. Islam promotes peace.
……………………………..
Grimly hilarious. The fact is that that Muslim countries are the most violent and *least* peaceful of any places on earth.
Anyone who understands the least thing about Islam should not be surprised, though.
More:
At the
same time, Islam exhorts it followers to fight where there is oppression.
……………………………..
“Oppression” includes anything that prevents Islam from taking over, including the existence of Infidel governments.
More:
The
fight against oppression may, at times, require the use of force. In Islam force
can only be used to promote peace and justice.
……………………………..
“Peace and justice” means the horror of Shari’ah law, which mandates amputation for petty theft, the sacralization of pedophilia, death for “blasphemy” and apostasy, and the stoning to death of rape victims.
More:
3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O’Leary.
……………………………..
De Lacy O’Leary was a witless Orientalist and apologist for Islam.
He is mentioned here, where you can see sham cribbed his spam here word for word:
ISLAM—World’s Greatest Religion!
https://islamgreatreligion.wordpress.com/tag/de-lacy-oleary/
More:
4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.
Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the
sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to
Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who
could openly give the adhan, that is the call for prayers.
……………………………..
How dare the Spaniards take back their country from the brutal Muslim conquerors? Certainly, Muslims today are constantly talking about reconquering that civilized country.
The fact is that the characterization of Muslim conquest in Iberia as some sort of “golden age” is nothing but Taqiyya:
“Fitzgerald: The persistent myth of Andalusia”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2005/11/fitzgerald-the-persistent-myth-of-andalusia
More:
5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians.
Muslims were the lords of Arabia for 1400 years. For a few years the British
ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia
for 1400 years. Yet today, there are 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians
……………………………..
Well, this is just bizarre, and on so many levels.
Firstly, the Copts are not Arabian at all–they are Egyptian (the name “Copts” comes from an eliding of “Egyptian”).
There are no native Christians left in Arabia at all–they were wiped out centuries ago.
The only Christians there now are guest workers unable to openly practice their faith or to ever become Saudi citizens.
As for the *actual* Copts, they comprise no more than 10% of the population in Egypt, where once, save for a smattering of Jews and pagans they comprised the entire population at the time of the Muslim conquest.
So 90% of the Christian population has been depleted though their fleeing, converting under pressure to Islam, or being murdered outright.
More:
i.e. Christians since generations. If the Muslims had used the sword there would
not have been a single Arab who would have remained a Christian.
……………………………..
There aren’t many left. There is just a remnant who survive. Turkey massacred most of their remaining Christians during the Armenian Genocide a hundred years ago. Few Christians survive in the birthplace of Christianity, Bethlehem.
And the sole remaining place in the Middle East with a large and (relatively) robust Christian population was Syria, where sham’s avid coreligionists are wiping them out even as we speak.
More:
6. More than 80% non-Muslims in India.
……………………………..
The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had
the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam…
……………………………..
There were several factors working against the Muslim conquerors wiping out Hindus there as they did Christians and Jews in Arabia: Muslims never conquered the whole of India; the arrival of the British put a crimp in their genocidal plans; and–most of all–there were too many Hindus to butcher them all.
In fact, Muslims often lamented this last fact.
But now the Islamic State plans to try again.
Doesn’t sham think we have read the article, above?
More:
“Which Muslim
army went to Indonesia and Malaysia?”
……………………………..
The idea that Muslims in Indonesia have not used bloody violence against Infidels there is grimly laughable. Just look at the terrible history of Christian-majority East Timor.
More:
8. East Coast of Africa.
Similarly, Islam has spread rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. One may again
ask, if Islam was spread by the sword, “Which Muslim army went to the East
Coast of Africa?”
……………………………..
Also incredibly grim. Muslims ran the horrifying slave trade out of sub-Saharan Africa for centuries.
More:
9. Thomas Carlyle.
The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book “Heroes and Hero worship”,
refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: “The sword indeed, but
where will you get your sword?
……………………………..
How can sham see that Carlyle is not here *confirming* that Islam is spread by the sword?
He just notes in addition that Islam appeals to some violent thugs. This has always been the case.
More:
10. No compulsion in religion.
With which sword was Islam spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use
it to spread Islam because the Qur’an says in the following verse:
“Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from
error”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]
……………………………..
What sham does not say here is that Muslims do not consider a sword to the throat to be “compulsion”.
More:
11. Sword of the Intellect.
It is the sword of intellect. The sword that conquers the hearts and minds of
people. The Qur’an says in Surah Nahl, chapter 16 verse 125:
“Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching;
and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious.”
[Al-Qur’an 16:125]
……………………………..
“Intellect”–Islam despises the intellect. As for Qur’an 16:125, the very next Ayat is about Muslims punishing their enemies.
Islam is an intrinsically violent creed, as the Islamic State makes abundantly clear.
Angemon says
You’re on a roll, GI 😉
krishna says
It is not 1 million but a whopping 80 million Hundus massacared by Mughal and Sultan dynasties during 800 years of atrocity.
linnte says
Krishna, most of us know that. I JUST learned of it myself. It stunned me, because I NEVER heard anything of this. It embarrasses me. American schools don’t teach it.
krishna says
not 1 million but 80 million hundus slaughtered by muslim rulers
mortimer says
You would almost believe ISIS wants to start World War III. But that would be Islamophobic and ‘racist’.
Our Leftarded, Western cultural Marxists ‘know’ Islam without having read Islam’s foundational source texts. They ‘know’ it through slogans and neo-Marxist categories, e.g. anyone who isn’t a neo-Marxist is a ‘racist’, etc.
If the Hindus would only stop offending Muslims by being Hindu, then the Muslims wouldn’t have to commit genocide of Hindus! Simple.
Hindus are not given the ‘third option’ of paying extortion tax to Muslims in exchange for breathing.
Halaku says
“Hindus are not given the ‘third option’ of paying extortion tax to Muslims in exchange for breathing”.
Actually Hindus were also declared people of the book by the Ulema and by the Caliph, after the conquest of Sindh by Hajjaj and Ibn Qasim. Which explains why they were treated as Dhimmis and paid the Jiiziya.
Hermes says
HALAKU WRITES…
“Actually Hindus were also declared people of the book by the Ulema and by the Caliph, after the conquest of Sindh by Hajjaj and Ibn Qasim. Which explains why they were treated as Dhimmis and paid the Jiiziya.”
No doubt for two reasons: 1) The Caliphate needs productive members of society to finance the ulema; 2) there are simply two many Hindus to kill all of them.
In order to defeat political Islam we need demographics, religion, and especially nations with religious identities, legal or actual. This leaves only two nations: Israel and India.
The salvation of the planet rests not with the superpowers of China or USA. It rests with Israel and India. Whatever you think of Jews and Hindus, we need them desperately. The an Orthodox Christian nation of Russia can help too.
BTW, I am not a member of any of the religious communities mentioned above.
The battle against political Islam begins in the hearts and minds of men and women. We need big families too. Perhaps this is why Buddhism failed to resist Islamic conquerors. When you give a son to the Sangha (monastic community) fewer children will result to keep the population up. Pacifism didn’t help.
Watch what happens when Muslims try to attack Punjab! Govinda Singh and his predecessors created a strong communal memory, as did the Marathas in what is now Maharastra state. However, I am also concerned about militant and chauvinistic Hinduism in India. Hatha Yogi Baba Ram Dev, if he is being quoted correctly, has said some outrageous things about actions that could morally be taken against Muslims.
Please remember that Muslims are not our enemy. Political Islam is. I welcome every Muslim to either follow what is best and humane in his or her religion (yes, there is some!), reject its worst teachings or completely abandon it in favour of secularism or another religion.
No religion is perfect. I am reminded of a Tamil Saiva sect that is also represented in Hawaii, USA. Their deceased American guru was honest and realistic. He told his followers that there was indeed historical atrocities and perversions of dharma (righteousness) during periods of Indian history, the most egregious example being when Hindus massacred Jains and Buddhists. And he rejected such a policy completely. Did it happen? Yes. Was he proud of it? No, and he strove to see violence by Hindus never arise again, not even in the home.
One does not raise the sword except in self-defence and after all other means have failed.
linnte says
Oh wow. You can read that 80 million Hindus were exterminated and still think it is only Islam that is our enemy. Imagine this- pretend an army of 500,000 Jihadis invaded the USA. Do you really think that Muslims here would fight next to a Kaffar to kill their fellows? I think NOT! The only, the ONLY reason American Muslims seem “peaceful” is because they are the minority. Period. Read the Qur’an.
Halaku says
“Hindus massacred Jains and Buddhists.” Really? All the extensive historical records talk about the destruction of Buddhist monasteries by the thousands and the massacre of monks by the Muslim ghazis like Bakhtiar Khilji. Buddhism disappeared wherever Islam entered. Period. Let’s not bring in moral equivalence where there’s none. The American guru did not know what he was talking about and most likely went by an ill informed presumption.
sham says
Forced conversion prohibited:
2:256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error.
2: 272. Not upon you (Muhammad SAW) is their guidance, but Allah guides whom He wills. And whatever you spend in good, it is for yourselves, when you spend not except seeking Allah’s Countenance. And whatever you spend in good, it will be repaid to you in full, and you shall not be wronged.
4:28 “If then they turn away, We have not sent thee as a guard
over them. Thy duty is but to convey (the message).
5: 92. And obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad SAW), and beware (of even coming near to drinking or gambling or Al¬Ansâb, or Al¬Azlâm, etc.) and fear Allah. Then if you turn away, you should know that it is Our Messenger’s duty to convey (the Message) in the clearest way.
6: 48. And We send not the Messengers but as givers of glad tidings and as warners. So whosoever believes and does righteous good deeds, upon such shall come no fear, nor shall they grieve.
6: 66. But your people (O Muhammad SAW) have denied it (the Qur’ân) though it is the truth. Say: “I am not responsible for your affairs.”
67. For every news there is a fact, i.e. for everything there is an appointed term (and it is also said that for every deed there is a recompense) and you will come to know.
68. And when you (Muhammad SAW) see those who engage in a false conversation about Our Verses (of the Qur’ân) by mocking at them, stay away from them till they turn to another topic. And if Shaitân (Satan) causes you to forget, then after the remembrance sit not you in the company of those people who are the Zâlimûn
69. Those who fear Allah, keep their duty to Him and avoid evil are not responsible for them (the disbelievers) in any case, but (their duty) is to remind them, that they may avoid that (mockery at the Qur’ân).
70. And leave alone those who take their religion as play and amusement, and are deceived by the life of this world. But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself no protector or intercessor besides Allah, and even if he offers every ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are given up to destruction because of that which they have earned. For them will be a drink of boiling water and a painful torment because they used to disbelieve.
7: 51. “Who took their religion as an amusement and play, and the life of the world deceived them.” So this Day We shall forget them as they forgot their meeting of this Day, and as they used to reject Our Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.).
7: 188. Say (O Muhammad SAW): “I possess no power of benefit or hurt to myself except as Allah wills. If I had the knowledge of the Ghaib (unseen), I should have secured for myself an abundance of wealth, and no evil should have touched me. I am but a Warner, and a bringer of glad tidings unto people who believe.”
9: 129. . But if they turn away, say (O Muhammad SAW): “Allah is sufficient for me. Lâ ilâha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), in Him I put my trust and He is the Lord of the Mighty Throne.”
10: 41. And if they belie you, say: “For me are my deeds and for you are your deeds! You are innocent of what I do, and I am innocent of what you do!”
10: 99. And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them together. So, will you (O Muhammad SAW) then compel mankind, until they become believers.
HIDAYA (A PERSON ACCEPT ISLAM) BELONGS TO ALLHA HAND:
35:8 Verily, Allâh sends astray whom He wills, and guides whom He wills. So destroy not yourself (O Muhammad SAW) in sorrow for them. Truly, Allâh is the All¬Knower of what they do!
40: 33. A Day when you will turn your backs and flee having no protector from Allâh, And whomsoever Allâh sends astray, for him there is no guide.
34…Thus Allâh leaves astray him who is a Musrif (a polytheist, oppressor, a criminal, sinner who commit great sins) and a Murtâb (one who doubts Allâh’s Warning and His Oneness).
35. Those who dispute about the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, without any authority that has come to them, it is greatly hateful and disgusting to Allâh and to those who believe. Thus does Allâh seal up the heart of every arrogant, tyrant. (So they cannot guide themselves to the Right Path).
49: 17. They regard as favour upon you (O Muhammad SAW) that they have embraced Islâm. Say: “Count not your Islâm as a favour upon me. Nay, but Allâh has conferred a favour upon you, that He has guided you to the Faith, if you indeed are true.
57: 29. So that the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) may know that they have no power whatsoever over the Grace of Allâh, and that (His) Grace is (entirely) in His Hand to bestow it on whomsoever He wills. And Allâh is the Owner of Great Bounty.
72: 21. Say: “It is not in my power to cause you harm, or to bring you to the Right Path.”
74:31Thus Allâh leads astray whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And none can know the hosts of your Lord but He.
74: 54. Nay, verily, this (Qur’ân) is an admonition,
55. So whosoever will (let him read it), and receive admonition (from it)!
56. And they will not receive admonition unless Allâh wills; He (Allâh) is the One, deserving that mankind should be afraid of, and should be dutiful to Him, and should not take any Ilâh (God) along with Him, and He is the One Who forgives (sins).
76: 31. He will admit to His Mercy whom He will and as for the Zâlimûn, (polytheists, wrong-doers, etc.) He has prepared a painful torment.
Hidaya only for true people:
8:23. Had Allâh known of any good in them, He would indeed have made them listen, and even if He had made them listen, they would but have turned away, averse (to the truth).
8: 53. That is so because Allâh will never change a grace which He has bestowed on a people until they change what is in their ownselves. And verily, Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.
Long live the crusades says
The word “let” is not in the Arabic, so the verse is not an imperative. What it actually says is “there is no compulsion in religion…” It is a statement that true belief can’t be forced. However, this is not to say that others can’t be forced into an outward manifestation of faith, such as the pillars of Islam:
Allah’s Apostle (Muhammad) said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally.” Bukhari 8:387
Even within the same sura (chapter) of the Quran that verse 256 appears, Muslims are instructed to “fight with them (non-Muslims) until there is no more persecution and religion is only for Allah. (v. 2:193)” Apologists will claim that this applied to the people of Mecca. They forget to add that the Meccans were later forcibly converted.
Sura 2 is from the early Medinan period. It was “revealed” at a time when the Muslims had just arrived in Medina after being chased out of Mecca. They needed to stay in the good graces of the stronger tribes around them, many of which were Jewish. It was around this time, for example, that Muhammad decided to have his followers change the direction of their prayer from Mecca to Jerusalem.
But Muslims today pray toward Mecca. The reason for this is that Muhammad issued a later command that abrogated (or nullified) the first. In fact, abrogation is a very important principle to keep in mind when interpreting the Quran – and verse 2:256 in particular – because later verses (in chronological terms) are said to abrogate any earlier ones that may be in contradiction (Quran 2:106, 16:101).
Muhammad’s message was far closer to peace and tolerance during his early years, when he didn’t have an army and was trying to pattern his new religion after Christianity. This changed dramatically after he attained the power to conquer, which he eventually used with impunity to bring other tribes into the Muslim fold. Contrast verse 2:256 with Suras 9 and 5, which were the last “revealed,” and it is easy to see why Islam has been anything but a religion of peace from the time of Muhammad to the present day.
Though most Muslims today reject the practice of outright forcing others into changing their religion, forced conversion has been a part of Islamic history since Muhammad first picked up a sword. As he is recorded in many places as saying, “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah…” (See Bukhari 2:25)
Muhammad put his words into practice. When he marched into Mecca with an army, one of his very first tasks was to destroy idols at the Kaaba, which had been devoutly worshipped by the Arabs for centuries. By eliminating these objects of worship, he destroyed the religion of the people and supplanted it with his own. Those who would not convert were killed or evicted. Later, he ordered that Jews and Christians be expelled from Arabia. Does forcing others to choose between their homes or their faith sound like “no compulsion in religion?”
According to Muslim historians, Muhammad eventually ordered people to attend prayers at the mosque to the point of burning alive those who didn’t comply. He also ordered that children who reached a certain age be beaten if they refused to pray.
Interestingly, even the same contemporary Muslims who quote 2:256 usually believe in Islamic teachings that sound very much like religious compulsion. These would be the laws punishing apostasy by death (or imprisonment, for females), and the institutionalized discrimination against religious minorities under Islamic rule that is sometimes referred to as “dhimmiitude.”
Islamic law explicitly prohibits non-Muslims from sharing their faith and even includes the extort
Carolyne says
Our President knows it by having been a Muslim and remaining one. I truly believe his intention is to Islamize the US and therefore the world.
Nay, Verily, Sham. You are a riot. Why is it that religious texts use English as spoken in the time of King James I? Is God or Allah an Englishman?
Porky The Crusader says
One can not say that muslims have no ambition, they really want to kill everyone on the planet and do not even try to hide it……
freewoman says
They’re remarkably open about their strategy, total arrogance.
Singh the Sikh says
Not to worry. Indians have obama’s reassurance that Islam is the religion of peace. They have nothing to fear. India’s 180 million Muslims are unlikely to be swayed by ISIS propaganda. They are safe and benign. Obama said so. It’s a false alarm. Nothing to worry about here. We have obama’s word for it.
mortimer says
Even Obama isn’t as forthright in his denials anymore. He’s realized people are buying the BS about Islam being ‘peaceful’.
Wakeup says
One question why do the US and Britain give aid to muslim countries eg pakistan? Mr Trump please take note cut the deficit.
Carolyne says
If the aid we give to Muslim countries were withdrawn and used to create a safe haven for the Syrian “Refugees” in Syria, everyone would be better off. Except, of course. those Jihadists taking over Europe.
Jaladhi says
If Indian government continue pushing the “secular” crap and don’t allow Hindus to assert themselves, ISIS=Muslims will definitely succeed in their allah’s mission!
If only Hindus(many a secular Hindus will not) will recognize that. And the same applies to USA also – Europe and UK are a gone case in their delusional multiculturalism quest.
King Sobieski says
Given the nuclear Arsenal India and Pakistan both possess , that will not go well . https://m.bnp.org.uk/news/national/biggest-holocaust-world-historywhitewashed-history
Walter Sieruk says
The jihadists of ISIS in their mad Islamic quest to establish a caliphate, with all the cruel, brutal and murdering violence that is part of it, will not respond the reason. For the Muslim fanatics who compose ISIS cannot understand logic, nor do they care about reason. Those jihadists of ISIS in their irrational unquestioning blind Islamic faith have and leave no room for reason. In this unreasoning blind Islamic drive the jihadist/Muslims who make up ISIS are a reminder of what Benjamin Franklin had printed in POOR RICHARD’S ALMANACK. Which is “The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason.”
Michael Copeland says
TRANSLATION
“implement”, as in “implement ‘sharia’ law” = impose by force.
sidney penny says
The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. Will Durant (U.S. Historian)
Yes not too many Hindus or anybody understands why this is so.
Message for Germany….
“whichever country has their sizable number amongst its population can never have peace on its soil.”
If you read Robert Spencer’s books you will understand why OR read this book.
This should be read by everyone, not just by the Hindus and other non-Muslims like the Sikhs and Christians ,not to mention the Buddhists.
The Calcutta Quran Petition
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/index.htm
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chii4.htm
The Calcutta Quran Petition
The Koran, also spelled as Quran, the so-called religious book of the Muslims the world over.
It is a Book which incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred, and ill-will between different religious communities and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities.
Non-Muslims have to learn to knock out Islam’s ideological fangs which are rooted in the Quran.
The Book has verses which preaches cruelty, incites violence and disturbs public tranquility. Chapter 4
The Book promotes religious enmity, hatred, and ill-will between different religious communities. Chapter 5
The Book insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities. Chapter 6
While the Koran abounds with saying which incite violence, insult the religious beliefs of other communities and even exhort the Muslims to kill and murder non-Muslims, the problem is aggravated by yet another fact which has been true in the past and is universally true in our own times that unlike other communities Muslims are, and even fresh converts tend to become, highly orthodox people and follow the sayings of the book with a fanatical zeal with the result that whichever country has their sizable number amongst its population can never have peace on its soil.
This was said in 1985 and it is still true today 2016
The offending expressions contained in the Koran and quoted above are not so offensive in their translation in which they are so quoted as they are in the original verses in Arabic or in Urdu, the very sound of whose inimitable symphony not only sends the Muslims to tears and ecstasy but arouses in them the worst communal passions and religious fanaticism which have manifested themselves in murder, slaughter, loot, arson, rape and destruction or desecration of holy places in historical times as also in contemporary period not only in India but almost all over the world.
This is why India needs a Common Civil Code,so that everyone is governed by the same rules and regulations, and you do not have separate rules for Muslims at their request bit like what is happening in Britain with the application of Sharia law.
sham says
“” Islamic conquest of India “”
THAT THE ”’ BIG FAT LIE’ ” FROM HINDU POLITICAL LEADERS FOR HINDU PEOPLE VOTE……THERE WAS NO VALID EVIDENCE FOR THEIR CLAIMS……..
The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had
the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today
more than 80% of the population of India are non-Muslims. All these non-
Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the
sword.
ISLAM IN INDIA:
Trade relations have existed between Arabia and the Indian subcontinent since ancient times. Even in the pre-Islamic era, Arab traders used to visit the Konkan-Gujarat coast and Malabar region, which linked them with the ports of South East Asia. Newly Islamised Arabs were Islam’s first contact with India. The historians Elliot and Dowson say in their book The History of India as told by its own Historians, the first ship bearing Muslim travellers was seen on the Indian coast as early as 630 AD. H.G. Rawlinson, in his book: Ancient and Medieval History of India[26] claims the first Arab Muslims settled on the Indian coast in the last part of the 7th century AD. Shaykh Zainuddin Makhdum’s “Tuhfat al-Mujahidin” is also a reliable work.[27] This fact is corroborated, by J. Sturrock in his South Kanara and Madras Districts Manuals,[28] and also by Haridas Bhattacharya in Cultural Heritage of India Vol. IV.[29] It was with the advent of Islam that the Arabs became a prominent cultural force in the world. The Arab merchants and traders became the carriers of the new religion and they propagated it wherever they went.[30]
In Malabar, the Mappilas may have been the first community to convert to Islam.[citation needed] Intensive missionary activities were carried out along the coast and many natives also embraced Islam. These new converts were now added to the Mappila community. Thus among the Mappilas, we find, both the descendants of the Arabs through local women and the converts from among the local people.[citation needed]
wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_India
Halaku says
Wrong. It was not for want of trying. The Sultans slaughtered Hindus by the millions for refusal to submit to Islam. They were hoping the others would be terrorised into converting, but they weren’t. Powerful Muslim rulers like the Mughal Aurangzeb tried their best lifelong to convert Hindus by declaration of jihad, by imposing jiziya and demolishing temples. They were routed and the Mughal dynasty was destroyed. Sensible rulers like Akbar had thrived because they abolished jiziya, allowed Hindus to worship openly and appointed Hindus to powerful positions.
Long live the crusades says
#### LIES BUSTED #####
Islam’s true face have been exposed long time ago,
Taqiyya is long past dead.
Islam spread by love is a outright lie especially in india
### THAT THE ”’ BIG FAT LIE’ ” FROM HINDU POLITICAL LEADERS FOR HINDU PEOPLE VOTE……THERE WAS NO VALID EVIDENCE FOR THEIR CLAIMS……..###
I never knew the historians all along for the past 15 centuries were HINDU RIGHT WING POLTICIANS!!!!!!!!!!
please won’t say Will Durant was a Hindu right wing politician.
#### THERE WAS NO VALID EVIDENCE FOR THEIR CLAIMS…….. ####
No wonder Moslems are COMPULSIVE LIARS.
I know your so called God commands to lie right in the face of INFIDEL. Make sure your lies are believe able next time.
There are many different poems written by moslem invaders, Kings, caliphs right from Arabs, turks, Persians such as ottomans, moguls and many many more describing the heaps and piles of heads of the infidels butchered when ever they waged jihad, invaded, ruled and converted rest to moslems.
Egypt, Persia(Iran), Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Whole of Northern part of Africa.
I find this similar to moslems and Leftists, politically correct leaders DEMONISING the Crusades. And hiding the facts crusades were direct result of Extreme ISLAMIC barbaric cruelty.
Next you might say the infidels were the most happiest at the hands of moslems and never suffered at all and the crusaders were a bunch of lunatics.
DHIMMITUDE (Extortion-easy money)
Today India is 80% Hindus,
That’s because they did not give up resisting the SAVAGERY jihad for more than 1000 years.
Actually Hindus were declared were treated as Dhimmis and paid the Jiiziya.”
No doubt for two reasons: 1) The Caliphate needs productive members of society to finance the ulema; 2) there are simply two many Hindus to kill all of them and they were constantly resisting the savages and defeated them in many battles.
ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST was converted to Islam by sword in a duration of 50-100 years after the death of self proclaimed prophet.
Now you say they were converted by love and but never by sword.
AL TAQIYYA IS DEAD.
THANKS TO INTERNET AND PEOPLE LIKE ROBERT SPENCER, BILL WARNER etc.
Heather says
They announce their plans to take over any (and every) country they can and yet we’re still letting them into our countries. Peaceful religion my ass. We need to come together and stop this menace instead of giving them housing and paying for their offspring …you know, the ones who are taught to kill us.
David says
It’s truly amazing. In America if there was a cult of mysoginististic, women beatin, murderous pedophiles the government would not be giving them the keys to the nuclear arsenal. And the left is in love with them, Bernie sanders is another self hating Jew, the British loved them in wwii I don’t see an end to this
Carolyne says
Actually there was a cult such as you describe and its leader, Warren Jeffs, is in prison. Funny how it is acceptable for Muslims to do what he did.
Khushi says
And to think that in 1947, when pakistan (east and west) was created, we had an opportunity to segregate muslims and non-muslims into 2 countries.
It wasn’t done because of m k gandhi and misplaced political correctness.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yep. Huge missed opportunity. Not only for India but also, around the same time – just a little later – Israel.
If the ‘exchange of populations’ at the partition of India had been *complete* there would be *no* non-Muslims in either Pakistan or Bangladesh to be exploited, persecuted, raped and ritually murdered by Muslims. And there would also be NO aggressive and expanding Mohammedan Fifth Column inside India. All acts of jihad terror against India would have to *get across the border* first.
And if in 1948 every single identifiable mohammedan within what became 1948-1967 Israel had been turfed OUT – and if, in 1967 the same procedure had been followed with all the liberated territory (Temple Mount and rest of Jerusalem; Judea, Samaria, Gaza… and Sinai) and that territory unapologetically absorbed into sovereign Israel (and the waqf given the boot from the Temple Mount and all mohammedan installations removed, completely, with no mohammedans permitted to visit from that day onward and Jewish sovereignty over and access to that most sacred of Jewish places unapologetically asserted and exercised) Israel would be in a *much* stronger position today. They too would have NO dangerous Mohammedan fifth column to worry about; they could just fortify and defend their borders. There would be no ‘stabbing jihad’ going on, because there would be no Mohammedans intermingled with Jews and able to carry out ambush attacks.
Khushi says
Hi DDA,
You are so right.These were all wasted opportunities.
Even Nehru going to the UN when pakistan barged into kashmir was a huge mistake. Our Home Minister Vallabhbhai Patel, fondly known as Sardar, would have driven the pakis out of kashmir in a flash and India would not be facing this daily problem that it now faces. He has left us and future generations with a festering wound.
I think all leftist leaders have no vision and no statesmanship. They only look for personal glory.
It is always a treat to hear from you 🙂
Geoffrey Cooper says
There will come a day, when the 1.2 Billion people of democratic, secular, intellectually and economically vibrant India are finally going to have had enough of the cowardly aggression of the primitive, despotic, Islamic failed states on their northern borders. We in the west should support our Indian friends in every way they require, because believe me, when the big one kicks off, they are going to be right on the front line and bearing a huge share of the burden in the great struggle that must inevitably come.
sham says
BLINDLY KILLING NON RELIGIOUS PEOPLE CHARACTER OF NON MUSLIM:
CHRISTIANITY:
Deuteronomy 13:6-9 “If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying: Let us go and worship other gods (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other, or gods of other religions), do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people.”
Also let us look at Deuteronomy 17:3-5 “And he should go and worship other gods and bow down to them or to the sun or the moon or all the army of the heavens, …..and you must stone such one with stones and such one must die.”
This verse was sent to me by Yusif 65; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him: 2 Chronicles 15:13 “All who would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether small or great, man or woman.”
JEWS:
“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”
Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”
Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
HINDUS:
Slay everyone who pours no gift, who, hard to reach, delights you not. Bestow on us what wealth he has: this even the worshipper awaits.” [Rigveda 1:176:4]
Rig Veda 9.13.9 ”May you (O love divine), the beholder of the path of enlightenment, purifying our mind and destroying the infidels who refuse to offer worship, come and stay in the prime position of the eternal sacrifice.”
Rig Veda 7.6.3 ”May the fire divine chase away those infidels, who do not perform worship and who are uncivil in speech. They are niggards, unbelievers, say no tribute to fire divine and offer no homage. The fire divine turns those godless people far away who institute no sacred ceremonies.”
Rig Veda 7.97.9 ”O Lord of knowledge, this laudation is for you…destroy the godless and the malice of our enemy.”
Rig Veda 5.2.10 ”May you roaring flames, O adorable Lord, be manifest in the sky as sharp weapons, to destroy infidels.
bernie says
Sham: that’s in the Old Testament, not in the New Testament. In the Gospels, Jesus said that if you’re a Christian and you go to a town where people mistreat you due to that, then you are to “leave the town, and shake the dust off of your feet as you leave.”
As well, even most Jews no longer take the violent, inconsistent and intolerant parts of the Torah literally, because they have largely learned to look at such verses critically, and to contextualize them within the main moral code of Judaism, that is, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” There are many Muslims who do realize that they are bound by the Hebrew moral code, as are Jews and Christians. However, modern Islam does seem to have a problem with Quranic literalism, especially in regard to violent and intolerant passages of the Quran.
Halaku says
Sham, NO Christian, Jew or Hindu is going around murdering fellow humans based on some scripture! Muslims are unique in this respect. They hate and kill everyone else, because their book tells them to do so. They are forbidden to have kafir friends and are encouraged to lie to them and cheat them. They are in a state of perpetual war against the non-Muslims and war is deceit.
Educated Muslims like you ought to be ashamed that they are defending a cult that brings misery and violence wherever it goes. You should be talking to your fellow Muslims and working hard to see that they start loving fellow humans and appreciating the benefits modernity has brought them.
Incidentally, I checked up the Rigveda translation and sure enough, you have replaced the word Evil with Infidels, to promote your hypothesis! Instead of painting others bad, try to spread love and happiness. Life is short.
freewoman says
People need to protect themselves. Our armies can’t do it all.
Carolyne says
I have read that on the road to Mecca there is a fork with directions for non-Muslims to go one way and Muslims the other, the way to Mecca, which allows only Muslims to enter. So it wouldn’t be the first time in the world that a holy city, such as Jerusalem, were off-limits to a certain religion, in this case Muslims.
desidude2 says
If ISIS wants to fight the Hindus of India than i say bring it on.Hinduism may be considered a peaceful religion yet it must be known that the 2 major Gods of Hinduism, Ram and Krishna were both warriors. They relentlessly and without mercy destroyed their opponents. Krishna compelled other to fight for him even if it meant they were killed in battle. The Sikhs are believers in the self defense and protection of hindu and sikh society. No hindu or sikh are going to let the 7th century barbarics roll over them again.
Long live the crusades says
No wonder Sikh means Lion.
They prove it with their bravery and courage by being only the defender but never aggressor
IndianTiger says
Bring it on, complete with your false bravado! Remember that my glorious ancestors, Marathas, inflicted crushing and humiliating defeats on you, led by the great Shiva ji. We will do the same again. But this time we will soak your bodies in pig blood and cremate you.
gravenimage says
Islamic State threatens attack on India, vows to wipe out Hindus
……………………
More genocidal dreams.
Indian Hindus have already suffered more Muslim savagery than any other victims–up to 80 million Indians, many of them Hindu, murdered in India during the Muslim invasion and conquest there.
And now they want to finish the job.
God, I hate Islam.