This is the Britain that David Cameron and Theresa May wanted. This is the Britain they have. They have hounded and persecuted counter-jihadis, while pandering to and appeasing the likes of Mohammed Ameen. So they have made their bed, and they won’t be able to escape lying in it.
“ISIS fanatic security guard, 23, wished his followers a ‘Happy 911’ and sent 8,000 tweets glorifying the terror group and encouraging jihad,” by Jenny Stanton, Mailonline, April 28, 2016:
An ISIS fanatic who wished his followers a ‘Happy 9/11’ and posted 8,000 tweets glorifying the terror group and encouraging jihad has been jailed for five years.
Mohammed Ameen, 23, used 42 Twitter handles and 16 different accounts to express his support for ISIS between May and October last year.
The security guard pleaded guilty last month to five counts of encouraging terrorism and one count of support for a proscribed organisation.
Ameen, of Dagenham, east London, also pleaded guilty to one count of dissemination of a terrorist publication, relating to a video called For The Sake Of Allah, posted on Twitter last September.
The court heard he sent tweets celebrating the 9/11 attacks in New York.
One read: ‘£TheMagnificent19 May you all get accepted in the highest ranks and multiply your kind! £Happy 911’.
An image was posted of a statement which read: ‘When we descend on the streets of London, Paris and Washington the taste will be far bitterer, because not only will we spill your blood, but we will also demolish your statues, erase your history and, most painfully, convert your children who will go on to champion our name and curse their forefathers.’
Ameen tweeted a picture of Mohammed Emwazi – known as Jihadi John – in a black face mask holding out a knife. Another tweet read: ‘Your 7/7 is our 24/7’.
Prosecutor Christopher Amis QC told the court it ‘perhaps gives an insight into the defendant’s mindset’.
Mohammed Ameen has been jailed for five years for sending a stream of tweets glorifying the Islamic State….
Guest says
And when Pamela Geller posts a quote from the Quoran its immediately removed as hate speech.
DFD says
In a way that would be somewhat ironic, since most of the quran does classify as hate speech.
Therefore, quoting quran is indeed hate speech – we live in idiotic times.
jr says
the death of england is upon us
mustapha crap says
England and Great Britain will NOT go quietly into the darkness that is Islam, there are a great number of patriots ready to fight back against the lies that our cowardly politicians are pushing. The fightback starts on June 23rd when we vote to leave the corrupt EU and take back control of our nation from the cowardly appeasers in Westminster and the faceless unelected scum in Brussels
elana says
OK but where are they??? Haven’t seen any around lately.
mortimer says
The UK government is persecuting anyone who even suggests that all may not be well within Islam, let alone anyone who says bluntly that Islam is evil.
Tommy Robinson was left in a cell with homicidal Islamists who attempted to torture and murder him, but they charged Tommy with fighting for his life!
The UK government has virtually criminalized speaking about Islam in public. They have imposed Sharia blasphemy law with little difficulty…even though all that is illegal.
The Public Order Act is a licence for crushing any discourse or thought the party in power doesn’t like. It has to go. It is draconian and fascist.
old white guy says
I have said this in the past and will say it once again. we will have to fight our own to save ourselves from the evil that is islam. our own people have such a degree of self hatred that it is almost suicidal.
linnte says
Britain First is a group in London attempting to get the vote and prevent the election of Khan, who hopes to be the Muslim Mayor in the next election. Toni Bugle is running for police Commissioner in her district in England to allow police to not be prevented by political correctness when arresting Muslim men who groom then rape young English girls. She also assists Muslim women to get to proper British courts to prosecute their husbands for abuse; something that is usually prosecuted in Sharia courts and therefore NOTHING is done. Tommy Robinson is speaking out and protesting the behavior of Muslim who act according to Sharia. The people who speak out are persecuted by Britons own Government, and labeled racists! We must give them our support!
African infidel says
Jihadists from the UK are now leading the ISIS-jihad wars in Africa, especially Somalia: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3565241/The-orange-bearded-British-jihadist-leading-ISIS-death-squadron-Bizarre-looking-Islamist-went-preaching-hate-London-mosque-setting-terror-group-s-Somali-base.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
James Street says
Britain is the Motherland of the US. We, here in the US, wish you the best in saving your great nation from the swarm of locusts’
Marty says
I am banned from Guidp Fawkes site because I don’t like islam & see it as threat to
everything we hold dear. “We” being all Westerners regardless of race.
This is Guido’s latest story
“Labour Director of Strategy and Communications Seumas Milne praising Hamas’
“spirit of resistance” and saying “they will not be broken“, to huge cheers.
Hamas is a proscribed terror group”
As a college lecturer I quit the largest lecturers’ union in the UK because it actively
supported Hamas & annually sent out representatives with felicitations to the
cowardly terrorists.
This was about 12 years back.
Small wonder thousands of well educated Brits emerge as muslim loving
jew haters.
linnte says
I quit getting posts from Anonymous because they too support Jihad! It astounded me, and every time I asked if these so-called “freedom fighters” had read the Qur’an, I was blasted by many as being hateful. Can you IMAGINE? Even the “rebels” are sucked into this politically correct crap!
islam :- the religion of con artists says
This idiot is such an idiot, it’s too much to comment, muslims are such idiots in general …
Anne Smith says
The idiocy in Islam is the result of hundreds of years of inbreeding with close relatives. Unfortunately, as well as idiocy it also results in birth defects, many hundreds of which are having to be treated on the NHS at a h uge cost to us all.
Michael Warden says
Report out in Britain some years ago : 3% muslims account for 30% birth defects. Physical or mental – or both.
Jay Boo says
Big knife — Little weenie
faraway says
From my local paper this morning:”A 23yo british man was sentenced to 5 years for…”.There is no mention of his name or his religion;yet another flagrant example of dis-information from dhimmi-land.
Chris Newcombe says
There must be someone somewhere controlling all of this, it can’t all just be spontaneous. Everyday we hear and read about the latest outrages committed in the name of Islam with attacks happening all over the world, no country seems immune. Somewhere Islam must have a massive logistics organisation, someone has to buy the explosives for the suicide vests, the arms and ammunition, the Toyota pick up trucks. Who is recruiting these people who are prepared to die while killing as many others as possible ? The world is at war against a very powerful organisation and it’s about time our governments accepted this fact.
Lepanto says
Chris
The organizational document is the quron and the hadiths. They instruct muslimes to kill, convert, enslave or dominate non muslimes. They have been aggressors for 1,300 years. If you don’t know your history you can’t put recent actions into context. Please study the issue and you will understand. A good way to start with is with the book “Crucified Again” by Raymond Ibrahim.
James Street says
My question is “why are all the EU leaders so accepting of these locusts? Why are they persecuting their own for protecting themselves from this ravaging hoard?” Sweden is being raped to death by muslims, yet the govt wants more muslim immigration???????? Is that rational? Why are they conforming to and accommodating these parasites? It makes ZERO sense.
John Stefan says
It seems to me that when people get away from the Bible, they lose the ability to think logically and they don’t know right from wrong anymore. I mean, though they still have the ingrained belief that it is wrong to kill, they now think that all religions are the same. And in the case of those who believe that the Qur’an comes from god, they even believe that it is right to kill for the sake of Islam and allah and to kill a Jew gets you to Paradise for sure. But when we believe what the Bible teaches, we’re in a completely different world when it comes to morals. God bless us all to get back to the Bible, to Jesus, our God and Saviour from our sins Who teaches us God’s truths for our own benefit and the benefit of our nation..
Fessitude says
Koran and Hadiths don’t provide tactical logistics, however; which is what Chris Newcombe’s question was pondering. It does seem to be a reasonable inference, that the sprawling and diverse (and seemingly random) jihad activity — not only the various forms of violence from low-level criminality to thuggishness to rapes to riots to seemingly spontaneous “sudden jihad syndrome” attacks on up to the formal terror attacks — is coordinated from a central command. However, that may not be the only necessary explanation for a concerted yet multifarious jihad throughout the West (and the Rest of the world). Stephen Coughlin has posited the interesting thesis that Muslims think and behave according to a different model from the Western way. He compares the way of thinking & operating of the two worlds to metaphorically as the “Spider” (the West) and the “Starfish” (Islam).
Basically, the modus operandi of the Spider conceives of strategy as a top-down operation with a command center making decisions and these decisions radiating out and down in a chain of command. The modus operandi of Islam, however, is radically different, says Coughlin. There is no single “head” or command center necessary. The blueprint for the jihad strategy resides in all its members — so if you cut one arm off the starfish, it just grows a new one elsewhere.
To quote from a recent briefing Coughlin made:
…in the Western understanding, you have the head department, you have bureaus [radiating out], you have things [further out] — and everything works on a line and block chart. And so, you would say, “If the head of the Brotherhood is here, he must have this person here, and have that person there…” [person in audience: “This is not the case in the Arab world…”] It’s not the case in the Arab world. We are “spiders”, they’re starfish. Each element does its thing and has its mission, but if you cut one of the pieces of the starfish off, it’ll go and become a starfish… and it’s … the world’s most perfect distributed information culture. So that what you have in Islam is… if everybody stopped believing, once somebody starts reading Islamic law as it’s actually designed, it can rebuild itself; it just can restructure itself.
I’m a science fiction fan — even bad science fiction. So I used to watch a TV show called Stargate… they had these “transformers,” and no matter how you could break them down, they could re-form into what they are…. Muslims may be completely imperfect, and any group of them may have an imperfect understanding of Islam. But Islamic law is crystal-clear — so much so that if you … destroy it… they work so hard to keep you from reading Islamic law, and tell you there are many interpretations. Now, on one level, that is not untrue, but on another level it is absolutely clear! So I’m saying that the Muslim Brotherhood has an absolutely clear command of control, and they have total authority where they act. Now, there may be groups out there that affiliate, and are a part, but I would say in the U.S., they’re offering … you have to know what the central core is — and it’s not a person. Even though I would tell you… Qaradawi is the leader today; if you killed him, there are any number of people that would replace him, and never miss a beat.
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-spider-and-starfish.html
bostongal912 says
Why don’t they just send him to Syria so he can be with his precious ISIS! He will no doubt get killed over there! Sounds good to me!!!
Marty says
Why prosecute this man ?
There are hundreds of thousands like him in the UK.
Including in Parliament & local government.
We even have state funded schools teaching his views.
elana says
Your party in hard labour – birth pangs, is not doing too well on center stage with antisemitism. Shame on them….
Bee says
This article and newspaper needs to be exposed. Traitors.
DFD says
We need to expose a lot more than just this. Try this: Write a reader letter/email to the Daily Mail pr Daily Telegraph, etc. Quote 1 or 2 verses from the quran and your concern thereto, it wont be published.
Reuben Scratton says
Wait a minute here.
This guy’s self-evidently a premier league Islamodick, but he’s been sentenced to hard time … for *tweeting*? For words? For linking to a video?
That does not sit right with me at all.
WorkingClassPost says
Good point.
What’s the difference between him and anyone of a thousand pious muslims quoting the koran and preaching islam?
Mirren10 says
Reuben Scratton says:
”This guy’s self-evidently a premier league Islamodick, but he’s been sentenced to hard time … for *tweeting*? For words? For linking to a video?”
”An ISIS fanatic who wished his followers a ‘Happy 9/11’ and posted 8,000 tweets glorifying the terror group and **encouraging jihad** ( my emphasis: Mirren) has been jailed for five years.”
I believe that’s the salient point. Encouraging jihad is the same as incitement to murder, and shows this particular judge knows what jihad means.
WorkingClassPost says:
”What’s the difference between him and anyone of a thousand pious muslims quoting the koran and preaching islam?”
I agree there is no actual **moral** difference; however, quoting the koran and preaching islam is not, in actual *law*, the same as outright support for the IS. Although it should be.
Mirren10 says
*Quoting* the koran, is of course, not necessarily indicative of support for the IS; it depends on the purpose of the quotations.
Westman says
”What’s the difference between him and anyone of a thousand pious muslims quoting the koran and preaching islam?”
The avocating of violence by personal instructions?
Fessitude says
More like: the only difference between him and all other Muslims who don’t seem to be inciting terrorism is that they are either doing so in stealth, or are pursuing other modes of jihad that don’t necessitate brazen Anjem-Chowderish candor.
Fessitude says
The J word was used by the reporter, Jenny Stanton; later in the article she says he was sentenced for “terrorism” incitement. So the judge need not know what jihad means to rule as he did, since even in the Western mainstream, “terrorism” is perceived as a danger and a crime. Given what we know about the mainstream (i.e., their Quantum Stupidity about the problem of Islam) it’s highly unlikely this judge knows (really knows) what jihad means. Perhaps Jenny Stanton is aware, or at least semi-aware; a good sign that she used the J word in this context.
gravenimage says
It *is* a good sign that Jenny Stanton used the “J-word”.
Alas, here she is on her Twitter feed, ginning up sympathy for Syrian “refugees”:
https://twitter.com/jenny_stanton
Her Twitter account seems to show a heartening hatred of violent Jihad coupled with absolute cluelessness as to where this comes from.
She’s also got the story up that the Muslim woman in Molenbeek was run over by a “right wing activist” in Molenbeek–even though this was debunked long ago when it was proven that a *Muslim* ran her down.
One step forward etc. etc…
Fessitude says
“Her Twitter account seems to show a heartening hatred of violent Jihad coupled with absolute cluelessness as to where this comes from.”
A problem that to some degree also extends in various, complex, and disorganized ways into the Counter-Jihad; largely unnoticed way (except by that greasy blogger-non-grata “Hesperado”…)
gravenimage says
Reuben Scratton wrote:
Wait a minute here.
This guy’s self-evidently a premier league Islamodick, but he’s been sentenced to hard time … for *tweeting*? For words? For linking to a video?
That does not sit right with me at all.
…………………………
Reuben, the limits of free speech are the incitement of violence, which this Jihadist was engaged in.
ECAW says
And what could be more inciting of violence than reciting the Koran on a Friday afternoon? When things get so bad that even our leaders realise that something must be done, a good first move might be to lift the protection of religious texts from hate speech legislation. IMHO.
linnte says
Where is this “Hate speech legislation”? Britain? Anytime ANY speech is limited by Government, everyone looses. I agree the Qur’an and Hadiths are FULL of hate and it fills Muslims with hate also. But that is SPEECH not actions. It is hate actions that need to be stopped, not people talking about anything. If speech can be deemed hateful and prevented, it is the person with the power who decides what is hateful and who to shut up.
If preaching the Islamic books becomes hateful, then my quoting the Qur’an to prove its hatefulness gets stopped too. You really want that? Not me!
It is horrible that anyplace has a hate speech Law! That is Shari’a Law at its finest!
ECAW says
Yes, we are the proud owners of a fine set of hate speech legislation which seems to be used more against the likes of us than imams calling for the death of infidels, apostates, homosexuals etc. It seems symptomatic to me that we got rid of our Christian blasphemy laws not very long ago only to replace them with de facto Islamic blasphemy laws. Ain’t life grand?
linnte says
Wow! I am so sad about this! How come I didn’t KNOW? Wow! So why aren’t Muslims in the streets parading and shouting “death to Cameron” and other horrible things get arrested for hate speech? Wow! I see your point now, wanting the Qur’an banned as hate speech! You’re STUCK in PC! Does this come from the EU? Or is it solely Britain? I just can’t wrap my head around this. I am blown away….
Reuben Scratton says
I’m not sure I believe in ‘incitement to violence’ any more than I believe in ‘hate speech’.
Maybe if there was a proven link… if there was someone who actually waged jihad in Syria or wherever and who’d pointed to this guy’s writings as his inspiration… *then* there might be a case to answer. But that’s clearly not the case, so it’s more about criminalising the *possibility* of incitement to violence. And that’s scary cos just about anything could qualify.
How can printing and/or distributing Korans not qualify as ‘incitement to violence’, given what we all know it contains?
linnte says
Reuben, exactly. No ones words are reason for incitement to violence. Personal accountability prevents me from being violent by how I respond to those words.
I have been stunned by Britain’s lack of action to Islamists who get away with saying horrible words to Anti-Islam protesters, but now I see that Britain is truly bought into Shari’a. This is so much deeper than I assumed. How can any one “fight” to prevent a doctrine that is destroying ones culture if it is “hate speech” to even talk about it?
Britain’s focus should not be to prevent Shari’a, but to return to true Democratic values and the problem would be solved!
Jay Boo says
Obama has indiscriminately killed more Muslims than any other US President.
Nothing incites Arab Spring Muslims to kill more than flattery.
The Pedophile Pimp Muhammad told Muslims that they are best of people.
duh_swami says
Islamic ambition…cruel, ruthless, evil…Allah willing, and he always is…
Marty says
Mohammed Ameen will merely infect other weak minded psychopaths in jail.
He needs to be in solitary.
Then stripped of UK citizenship & deported.
UK jails are full of muslim criminals who convert other criminals, partly for
“protection” & partly because it give the criminals divine authority for just about anything.
mortimer says
That’s another insight into the ‘mindset’ of Islam…it attracts hardened criminals. WHY?
gravenimage says
Islam is perfect for violent felons, because it sacralizes theft, rape, and murder–so long was it is done to the “filthy Kuffar”.
Reuben Scratton says
I think it was Robert Spencer who pointed out that no-one should be surprised that the only religion that promises heavenly reward for killing should attract so many killers.
Angemon says
What happens after he does his time? Because I doubt he’ll become a loyal, law-abiding citizen. I suspect we’ll hear from him 2 or 3 years from now. Something along the lines of “Former security guard on a terror watchlist manages to evade security and moves to Syria with his family”.
Angemon says
That is the second best possible scenario, the best one being “Former security guard on a terror watchlist blows himself and his islamist buddies up while building a home-made explosive device”.
Mirren10 says
“Former security guard on a terror watchlist blows himself and his islamist buddies up while building a home-made explosive device”.
🙂
Yes please.
Mirren10 says
“Former security guard on a terror watchlist manages to evade security and moves to Syria with his family”.
Yep.
Or even worse:
”Mohammed Ameen, a former security guard on a terror watch list, has been cited as one of the perpetrators of the suicide bomb attack on …. ( insert any public venue of your choice), which has resulted in the deaths of over 500 British citizens, and the maiming of hundreds more.”
ECAW says
Mirren10 – Don’t we have to accept that it will take many deaths (preferably among those who put us in this position) to wake the population up? I am very ambivalent when I hear about the latest atrocity (or nuanced as we Guardian readers say).
Mirren10 says
”Don’t we have to accept that it will take many deaths (preferably among those who put us in this position) to wake the population up? ”
No, I don’t think we do. Although I’m with you in hoping the *next* atrocity would take out camoron, blair, brown, may et al, not to mention the entire EU cabal.
But, ECAW, that will *never* happen, because they are all surrounded by top notch security teams, wherever they go, plus their homes, offices etc. And you can bet your boots, no matter what islamophiliac drivel they intone in public, *no known* mohammedan will be allowed anywhere near *them*.
The many deaths will be innocent citizens, men, women and children, victims of the puffed up conceited rhetoric of the politicians, and the msm slime and cowardly ‘academics’ (like that tosser Max Abrahms on the other thread) who cover for them, excuse them, and confabulate with their foul lies. I don’t even hate mohammedans as much as I hate them.
So, no, I can’t accept, and I can’t be ambivalent about, the likely massacres of my innocent fellow citizens, and not just in the UK. I just hope that the wakening up process, which *is* happening, however gradually and slowly, speeds up, and people decide enough is enough, and force governments to take responsibility for what they’ve created, *before* there is another horrendous bloodbath orchestrated by filthy mohammedans and their enablers.
ECAW says
I didn’t expect you to agree…I know I’m in a minority in this view, but has the painfully slow wakening so far not been largely the result of the repeated outrages?
Mirren10 says
Actually, I do.
ECAW says
Why should the future be different to the past then?
(am I being a bore?)
Fessitude says
ECAW says
April 29, 2016 at 12:53 pm
“Why should the future be different to the past then?”
I’m with ECAW’s pessimism (if I understand the drift of his somewhat cryptic remarks to Mirren above); however, he may be premising an erroneous view of the overarching problem of Islam – a view that is not factoring in one key feature of the nature of Islam and of Muslim behavior flowing out from that nature of Islam: to wit, that their malicious mischief is not a relatively static phenomenon, but is inherently coded and geared and guided to expand, to metastasize — to get horribly worse and worse over time, in the coming decades of this 21st century. This escalation of the worsening will take myriad forms, and will eventually force a generalized breakdown and crisis throughout the West (unless, of course, the West wised up sooner, rather than later, to rounding up all Muslims and deporting them; but that’s not likely – and I say that because even in the Counter-Jihad, every time I raise this robustly, I am attacked by various Counter-Jihad individuals – including the various friends of Mirren here at Jihad Watch, whom she tacitly supports in their attacks, apparently).
Given that we reasonably infer that the overarching situation of Mohammedan invasion of the West (in the form it’s taking which makes it difficult to recognize for the vast majority of Westerners, blinkered as they are by the mainstream and dominant worldview of PC MC) is escalating and metastasizing and will not stop until Muslims start destroying our societies in earnest piece by piece, limb from limb (which, again, could be prevented or at least significantly minimized, but probably won’t; cf. supra), it is then reasonable to assume that the West will finally wake up to the full catastrophe of what is happening (and what had been unfolding for decades). The only question is, will the West wake up in time to save its civilization, or too late? I sadly think the latter; and there’s nothing I would rather be more wrong about than that…
gravenimage says
ECAW wrote:
Mirren10 – Don’t we have to accept that it will take many deaths (preferably among those who put us in this position) to wake the population up?
…………………………….
Dear ECAW, the problem with this assumption is that it does not take into account the pernicious phenomenon of acclimation of many to even the most appalling of circumstances.
Many dhimmis are *already* describing the regular experience of horrific Jihad terror attacks as the “new normal”.
With increased Jihad terror atrocities, some *will* continue to wake up–but many will also just decide to passively accept their Muslim overlords.
“Survey: 90% of 13-year-olds at Italian school would convert to Islam if the Islamic State came to their home”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/survey-90-of-13-year-olds-at-italian-school-would-convert-to-islam-if-the-islamic-state-came-to-their-home
I actually *am* ultimately optimistic about the West waking up–but I don’t believe that increased Jihad terror is in and of itself going to accomplish this.
Jihad may well–as it is intended to do–just strike terror and surrender in the hearts of Infidels, *unless* we are ready to defend our civilized societies and not just roll over for Muslim conquest.
ECAW says
I quite agree graven. More attacks, and many of them, are a necessary but not necessarily sufficient condition. I hear people say “What can yo do, we’ll just get used to it”. On the other hand I have been heartened recently by two contacts, a family member and a friend of my wife, starting to understand what I’ve been banging on about all this time. For one of them the turning point was Trevor Phillips, TV program with that poll – even though there have been endless similar polls before which just haven’t made it to the MSM.
Mirren10 says
ECAW says:
”Why should the future be different to the past then?”
No reason. I just hope to God it will be.
mortimer says
Quote: Prosecutor Christopher Amis QC told the court it ‘perhaps gives an insight into the defendant’s mindset’.
BRILLIANT DEDUCTION, Sherlock.
Why don’t you geniuses in the police, intelligence and government (and judges too) read and study the Islamic foundational texts of Islam so you can to give you ‘an insight into Islam’s mindset’?
Ignorance of Islam is not bliss…it is suicidal.
Singh the Sikh says
You can take the Paki out of Pakistan. But you can’t take Pakistan out of the Paki. Hence the mushrooming of mini Pakistans in GB and the the great things that come with it – such as bombing plots galore.
mortimer says
Pak-istan…the land of the ‘pure’ …. implying that ‘others’ are impure…najis kufaar who should be exterminated as vermin. Islam is not charming when you learn its ideology of supremacism.
KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM says
Please Morti, can we whack a few of them?
gravenimage says
Oh, you can take the Pakistan out of the Paki–but only if he leaves Islam behind, as well.
mortimer says
correction: …so they can give you ‘an insight into Islam’s mindset’?
Singh the Sikh says
This inbred spawn of cousin sex said:
‘…not only will we spill your blood, but we will also demolish your statues, erase your history and, most painfully, convert your children who will go on to champion our name and curse their forefathers’.
Retarded as he is, the truth of what he speaks is undeniable. Indian and Pakistani Muslims are the best living proof.
David says
Just what I would expect from a brutal, barbaric savage! Who still worship satan in this the 21st century.
Britain is fast becoming just another muslim HELL hole! What’s next? Brothels with goats, sheep and camels? To make the Muslims feel more at home?
Street side stands selling a refreshing glass of warm camel urine?
How much lower can this sink???
Panmelia says
Hang on, Britain is not that bad – yet. I live in the north east where life goes on much as it did in the 1930s when my house was built.
Our town has a majority white population which is how we like it – much less strife. Diversity of colours, cultures, nationalities and creeds (especially creeds) is not actually a good thing, as multiculti politicians try to convince us, in order to cover up their massive policy failures and lack of democratic values.
The UK used to be a homogenous society that was much more peaceful and law-abiding. The British electorate were never consulted on whether they wanted mass immigration to alter that situation.
Occasionally, reporters from the left-wing-biased TV channels come around (one memorable one wearing a hijab) asking our views on immigration and then faking incredulity when we say we don’t want any more of it in our country. “Oh, but why do you say that when you have so few immigrants here?” they exclaim. They aren’t the brightest buttons in the box.
I’m waiting for one of these idiots to accost ME and ask that question. “Because we don’t want to be like other places in our country where it’s not like our country anymore!” I’d reply. Then I might get arrested for not agreeing with the government’s policy of overcrowding Britain with people who want to change it to suit themselves, or even hate us and want to blow us up.
Michael Warden says
Two generations ago there were just a few thousand muslims in Britain and a handful of mosques (no Sharia Courts). Fast forward to today and there are 3,500,000 of the buggers, 2000 mosques and 100 Sharia Courts.
As Mr.Spencer would say : “What could possibly go wrong ?”.
And in two generations time ? A muslim majority population. That’s what.
Jay Boo says
“Hitler was a Zionist”
According to Labor Party Ex-London Mayor Ken Livingstone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-sq1DVm1Ro
Islamophobia — is hate
but Anti-Semitism — OK
Muslim Point of veiw
Jay Boo says
Ex-London Mayor- Ken Livingstone
This was meant as first video.
It is not surprising that Muslims are not ashamed to be Muslims and publicly preach their hate in the UK.
The left bows to Muslims in deference yet condemns Jews.
Jay Boo says
Muslim Point of view about Ex-London Mayor Ken Livingstone
gravenimage says
Ken Livingston is a *nasty* piece of work. Is anyone surprised that Iran state mouthpiece PressTV is championing his rantings about Adolf Hitler?
That this vile tool was ever mayor of one of the greatest cities in the world is appalling.
Here’s his apologia for the 7/7 bombers and his blaming this Jihad attack on Tony Blair:
“Outrage as Red Ken says the 7/7 bombers ‘gave their lives’ for the cause: Former London mayor attacked for ‘shameful’ comments blaming the atrocity on Tony Blair’s invasion of Iraq”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3335820/Outrage-Red-Ken-says-7-7-bombers-died-beliefs.html
“Former London mayor Ken Livingstone sparked outrage last night after claiming the 7/7 suicide bombers who killed 52 people in the capital ‘gave their lives’ in protest at Britain’s invasion of Iraq…”
Baucent says
“has been jailed for five years”
In other words he has been sent to Jihadi school behind bars and will emerge in a few years time more fanatical and dangerous.
gravenimage says
And don’t forget all the Da’wa he will spread in prison himself.
Walter Sieruk says
As for the ISIS guy wishing his friends “Happy 9/11” he by doing that is only exposing the demonic/Islamic mindset .Furthermore as for that heinous murderous affront committed by those jihadists who were operatives and stooges of al Qaeda who engaged in the hideous actions of Islamic terrorism on September 11, 2001 those Muslim /jihadists were overcome by those American heroes of United 93 banded together to fight the jihadists and foiled their evil scheme by preventing more death and destruction in Washington D.C. The heroes united in a band or cord against those Islamic evildoers. The above is a reflection of Ecclesiastes 4: 12. This reads “Though one may be over-powered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken..” Finally, all these jihadists will have a harsh awakening after they die; they will find out that they were lied to about a paradise.with many houris. For that Koranic fable is just one of many “cleverly invented stories” of men Second Peter 1:16. I[N.I.V.]Instead of place with virgins they will find themselves trapped in hell with no hope.
Walter Sieruk says
That ISIS Muslim character with the “happy 9/11” wish was revealing about the vicious and evil way of thinking of those who compose ISIS Moreover, those Muslim who were al Qaeda operatives who schemed and carried out that affront on September 11, 2001 showed that they are lawless, ethically corrupt and have a warped worldview. “They band together against the righteous and condemn the innocent to death.” Psalm 94:21 Furthermore, those Muslims who praised the hijackers, they only showed their lawless spiritual condition by doing so. Also the U S military showed its lawful response to the Taliban and al Qaeda [Base] in Afghanistan with the bombing of the jihadists who put the hijackers up to it, therefore, resisting and eradicating the wicked Taliban “government.” Likewise, the passengers on flight United 93 who resisted the jihadists so those al Qaeda operatives didn’t make it to their target are the hero’s and the lawful ones.
The above may be seen in the Bible. For Proverbs 28:4 reads “Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law resist them.” [NIV]
Florida Jim says
Obama shows the same hatred toward anyone who disagrees with him as the other muslims.
jayell says
So this specimen was a security guard – a position of trust. How many more of these specimens are in positions of trust in the UK? Or in jobs where they could cause harm of any kind to the public (airports, transport systems, water supply, electricity supply, the police, the civil service, medicine, education….). It’s already happened in Education and politics, and we don’t know what trouble they may already have caused in the Health service. Just a matter of time…..
RightStuff1944 says
Until the addle-brained people of this world wake up to the fact that Islam is at war with everything and anything non-Muslim, these animals will continue dragging us back to the seventh century. Perhaps maybe one day, we will sober up and declare war against this caustic, toxic political ideology.
bridgette says
He got five years? So after five years he’ll get out and become a perfect UK citizen right? What a joke. They need to do what China does – take them out and shoot them. There is no cure for brainwashing.
Champ says
On top of his heinous comment “Happy 911”, this evil perp is *smiling*, too. Wow what a heartless, soulless POS. Yeah THIS guy is true islam–the face of evil islam.
gravenimage says
The only time Muslims exhibit joy is over their contemplation of savagery, Champ.
Concerned Citizen says
If they descend on the streets of Washington, I hope all Americans will go and fight these stupid terrorists! We will slaughter them instead! Ignorant backward people. They can’t defeat people that can protect themselves. They always target defenseless people. Even though I don’t like the libs on Capitol Hill, I wouldn’t want them to take one single city over here in the states.
Fessitude says
You sound like you’re unaware of how deeply Muslims have already infiltrated various parts of the U.S. — fanned out in every state in a network of hundreds of mosques; every university with its Muslim Brotherhood-connected Muslim Student Association; various alphabet-soup Muslim organizations with chapters in nearly every state; and certain areas of higher (and deeper) concentration — Michigan, Florida, the Washington Beltway.
And my knowledge of this is quite limited; it’s likely far worse than I’m describing — consider the series of investigative articles published at the GAtes of Vienna blog about the insidiously industrious activity of Muslim activists in Tennessee:
How the Muslim Brotherhood Operates in Tennessee (Part 1 of 8)
http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/03/how-the-muslim-brotherhood-operates-in-tennessee-part-1-of-8/
Who’s to say similar activity isn’t going on in numerous other states of the Union, only not noticed because similar investigation (usually by concerned civilians having to take up the slack of government and news media failing to do their jobs) has not cast a light on them?
Concerned Citizen says
You are absolutely correct Fessitude! I meant if they were literally in the streets fighting, then we should go there. I know they have infiltrated many organizations in our country unfortunately. ISIS did state they will rule from within. It’s getting scarier and scarier by the minute but I will not just lay down and quit!
My husband was reading the Drudge Report last night and he said that ISIS has named 3600 New Yorkers by infiltrating the Internet with their “Cyber Caliphate” and listed names, addresses and phone numbers so bad people should target them. Then he looked at me and said for me to stop talking about ISIS and talking to people on the Internet because he doesn’t want to be targeted. I told him that I think it’s sad because that’s what ISIS wants so that we will be afraid. He doesn’t want to see his name being targeted. I just don’t understand people. Ugh!!
linnte says
Concerned, I am very “vocal” about Islam on the internet, Facebook, etc and suspect “they” know who I am. I don’t get any more posts from Huffington or AlArybia and frequently when I try to view a video on Facebook about Islam, it won’t play, but the kitten videos and ads will play! I even told some friends that if I turn up dead someday and it isn’t a medical reason, that it’s some Muslim group who has had me killed. To me, Islam is the most pressing issue facing humankind today. This is war being fought from within, and that’s the way we must fight it; from within. If I die at the hand of an Islamic Jihadi, then I die knowing I did everything I could do to prevent my eight grandkids from living in bondage. So be it!
ECAW says
Linnte – I hope you at least use a VPN (Hide My Ass is good) and fake email addresses.
linnte says
To late! I had no clue about the possibility of being threatened before I started opening up my big mouth! Hahahahahaha! I use a moniker here, but other stuff, it never dawned on me. Yeiks! Remember, I USED to think Muslims were good. It was trying to prove my family wrong about them that I stumbled upon the reality. I may live to die for that reality. Just call me Boudicca! ?
Fessitude says
I’m not sure those NYC targets which ISIS says has hunted down and/or will hunt down through its cyber-jihad on the Internet were were people doing counter-jihad stuff online, but rather people who had said or done things in “real life” perceived to be against Islam — or just people they want to kill as part of their general goal of sowing terror (I believe one of the groups they targeted were various NYC police officers). I wouldn’t doubt though that they are also trying to target countless people on the Internet as well.
Fessitude says
Perhaps I can rest easy in this regard (the problem of ISIS ever trying to track me down for my Internet activities against Islam), if ISIS were to take the time to see that so many in the Counter-Jihad Mainstream actually think I’m hampering & hobbling the Counter-Jihad at worst either unwittingly or willfully (seems to be the view of an Angemon or his previous tag-team partner, “PJ” – heck, Angemon once compared me to Goebbels!); or that I’m just a greasy, despicable nuisance at best (the apparent view of Mirren, Jay Boo, Champ, and dumbledoresarmy, wht gravenimage thinking she can straddle the fence on this); and last but not least, that according to Robert Spencer himself, I “hate” Robert Spencer… [scroll up and down from my comment as “voegelinian” (and notice three of the aforementioned chiming in reflexively): http://tinyurl.com/jry3f5n%5D. If the Cyber-Caliphate wing of ISIS is as smart as the Peanut Gallery (Angemon, PJ, Champ, Jay Boo, mortimer, dumbledoresarmy, Mirren, et al.), they’ll agree with them and conclude I’m not only harmless, but perhaps a positive nuisance to the Counter-Jihad (or worse – a “Goebbels”!)…
Angemon says
Fessitude posted:
“Perhaps I can rest easy in this regard (the problem of ISIS ever trying to track me down for my Internet activities against Islam), if ISIS were to take the time to see that so many in the Counter-Jihad Mainstream actually think I’m hampering & hobbling the Counter-Jihad at worst”
Have you ever thought to wonder why so many think that? Could it have anything to do with your undermining and deriding of the forefront figures of the CJ movement, all in the name of your own self-interest?
“either unwittingly or willfully (seems to be the view of an Angemon or his previous tag-team partner, “PJ””
Huh, voeg? You were the one who tag-teamed against me. Remember the “godless” debacle? The videos you made decrying JW regulars? PJ and I only interacted in JW. You went on PalTalk to recruit people to come here and harass me.
“– heck, Angemon once compared me to Goebbels!);”
Why was that? Because I remember explaining it to you (and everyone else who read it) in detail. You consistently, systematically and repeatedly went around *lying* about me, my stances and my actions. I believe my words were, if not exactly then almost exactly, “repeat a lie long enough and people will buy it – Goebbels would be proud!”. Of course, there’s nothing new here – you found someone who patted you on the head and so you’re trying to poison the well and present the people you hate as being in the wrong. Woe is you!
“or that I’m just a greasy, despicable nuisance at best (the apparent view of Mirren, Jay Boo, Champ, and dumbledoresarmy,”
Citation needed.
“wht gravenimage thinking she can straddle the fence on this);”
Because, in your eyes, whoever is not with you is against you, right?
“and last but not least, that according to Robert Spencer himself, I “hate” Robert Spencer… [scroll up and down from my comment as “voegelinian” (and notice three of the aforementioned chiming in reflexively):”
Hmmm, I wonder where Mr. Spencer got the idea you ahte him. Could it have anything to do your your decade or so dedicated to deriding and undermining him? For f***’s sake, you ran a site dedicated to “prove” how much of a “softie” JW contributors (especially Mr. Spencer) were!
Tell you what: rather than scrolling down in the middle of an argument, why not start from the beginning? Why aren’t you linking to the original post you made and see the responses you got?
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/07/jihadi-john-flees-the-islamic-state#comment-1274002
Oh, that’s right – you *need* to start the narrative in the middle so you can play the victim.
Angemon says
“wht gravenimage thinking she can straddle the fence on this”
For full disclosure, GI had nothing if not the patience of a saint when dealing with you. She defended you when she felt you were being misinterpreted and she praised you when you made good posts. But that’s not what you want, is it? You want full, unquestioned obedience – people are to defend you no matter what, no questions asked. What does GI has to show for her defence of you? Several kicks to the teeth and stabs in the back. Talk about being ungrateful…
Champ says
Off-Topic Pity-Party Alert!
I see that “Fessitude” is up to his ole tricks, again, of going completely off-topic and whining about this person, and that person, and making everything about *him*, all over AGAIN.
This ridiculous nonsense is extremely tiresome …
Marc, please ban this clown–again. Thank you.
common sense says
Do a search on mosque’s in the US and you will find reports on the more “radical” ones that cater to tools like this sadistic POS who was imprisoned ( a slap on the wrist really).
“Freedom of thought, freedom of expression, freedom of association, even if generated and defined by hatred, is protected, as long as that does not produce immediate lawless violence,” Judge Napolitano quotes.
So Imams can get away with charging these cowards up while they are in so called prayer at the mosque because they did not immediately go slice someone’s neck. If you give a directive and someone follows it right away and it can be proven beyond a shadow of doubt then you can prosecute, that is how they get around our law by inciting murder and rape. You also have a chance to rebuke yourself in your following words as to not incriminate yourself and if idiots go off and kill someone anyway you can always testify that you said to not really do it or that you rebuked yourself in someway. This is how mosques survive and how Imam’s get away with citing murder and rape from the killer Mohammad’s manifesto. Also in islam’s only brilliant stroke they made a ‘religion’ to gain it some protection from the uninformed. Mohammad liked killing, he needed buddies and laid the scam down to attract the rest of the murderer’s and rapist pedophiles. The crusades and the creation of the USA are probably the 2 biggest reasons why the world is not a muslim cesspool altogether.
This tool got in trouble for openly and widely celebrating people who were already killed in a known criminal act. Total dumbsh*t move he could have texted his friends and no one would have been the wiser. UK law on hate speech is for some stupid reason more strict when speaking against Islam.
gravenimage says
UK: Islamic State security guard wished friends “Happy 911”
………………………….
Aw–who says Islam isn’t friendly? sarc/off
More:
An image was posted of a statement which read: ‘When we descend on the streets of London, Paris and Washington the taste will be far bitterer, because not only will we spill your blood, but we will also demolish your statues, erase your history and, most painfully, convert your children who will go on to champion our name and curse their forefathers.’
………………………….
Then again, maybe not…
Really, this sums up Islam’s approach to multiculturalism in a nutshell–find Infidel society, murder Kuffur, convert any survivors not enslaved, and destroy the society’s history so that the new Muslims will not remember where they came from.
*Ugh*.
gravenimage says
No mention of where this Jihadist was providing security for.
There are, of course, lots of decent security guards–but how many are like Mohammed Ameen? Most security companies do little to vet their employees.
This does not inspire confidence…
More Ham Ed says
Dirty beards.
More ham.