“Briton Mohammed Ali Ahmed, 26, and Belgian citizen Zakaria Boufassil, 26, both from Birmingham in central England, are charged with giving £3,000 ($4,400, 3,800 euros) to Abrini.” Why did this “Briton” and this “Belgian” do this? Because they hate Britain, and Belgium, and non-Muslims, and believe they have a divine responsibility to wage war against them. Their citizenship is for them a matter of convenience, not loyalty. But Western authorities resolutely ignore this fact.
“Two UK arrests over funding for Paris attacks,” RFI, April 29, 2016 (thanks to Lookmann):
Two people appeared in court in London on Friday accused of giving thousands of pounds to Brussels and Paris attacks suspect Mohamed Abrini when he was in Britain last summer.
Briton Mohammed Ali Ahmed, 26, and Belgian citizen Zakaria Boufassil, 26, both from Birmingham in central England, are charged with giving £3,000 ($4,400, 3,800 euros) to Abrini.
Abrini has confessed to being “the man in the hat” caught on video with suicide bombers at Brussels airport on March 22, before coordinated attacks that left 32 people dead.
He has also been charged in relation to the November attacks in Paris, that left 130 people dead.
Ahmed and Boufassil are accused of meeting with Abrini in Birmingham in July 2015 and giving him the money.
The formal charge is that they made available funds that they had reasonable cause to suspect would or may be used for the purposes of terrorism….

Angemon says
They should either be charged with treason in their own countries or as enemy combatants in France.
jayell says
Can we please stop calling these people ‘Britons’? They may have been given UK passports for whatever reason, but that’s about as near they get to being properly ‘British’. They don’t in any way resemble the genuine domestic product, nor do they in any way intend to try conform to the standards of the genuine product. They may perhaps be correctly labelled ‘British Asians’ or whatever other epithet might satisfy the UK Trades Descriptions laws. But ‘Britons’ they ain’t.
Marken says
Robert writes the term ‘Briton’ in quotation marks as a sort of ribbing as it is typically used in the media as cover. I rather enjoy it when ‘Briton’ is used by Robert. It means ‘covenant people’ from the Hebrew root. B’RIT Bet-Resh-Yod-Tau which means covenant. And if Mohammadans wish to call themselves Brits, know they are labeling themselves with a Hebrew term. The Jewish Messianics call the New Testament the B’rit Chadashah, the New Covenant.
Lawrence says
Not true and I say that as a Hebrew speaker. That idea comes from a British Christian sect from a long while back. It really is just a coincidence, nothing more.
common sense says
I prefer the hands behind back, prone on the ground, knee on the back of the head while getting cuffed picture.
Is this an actual pic of the arrest? He gets a blanket, phone call and a bro hug escort? Really?
He has admitted to helping kill people and is collusion with the most terrible faction of our enemy. Ridiculous! Shame on the Brits for being so soft and overly concerned about islamaphobia. Elevator ride for sure……
Anne Smith says
To common sense: The True Brits are not soft but our politicians are. Why? They are all infected with political correctness which came from America and is now rife in our country, ruining what used to be a land where common sense ruled and law and order were respected.
Now ethnicity is seen as having to be privileged and promoted above the native Brits and all the rubbish you see here is flowing from that.
There was a recent gang rape in a Kent car park and the police have refused to disclose the ethnicity of the perpetrators. Wonder why?
Champ says
Their ultimate loyalty is to an evil cause: islam!
DFD says
Hi All,
I am off topic, again, but I honestly think you need a break from all these dreadful, depressing news!
So, here’s a place with Muslim jokes, goats, camels, everything. “Planck’s Constant”, laughter guaranteed. Not only jokes, but the cartoons/caricatures and *road signs* are also worthy of attention. This guy was really putting something together, I thought I’d share this find with you –
that means you’d better appreciate it!
============================
Here’s the link : http://plancksconstant.org/archs.html
And again, a bit of cross posting will, hopefully, be excused. It’s worth it I believe
below a few morsels…
Enjoy
Q: What do you call a Muslim who owns a camel and a goat?
A: Bisexual.
Q: How do Muslims practice safe sex?
A: They mark the camels that kick.
Q: What do Tehran and Hiroshima have in common?
A: Nothing, yet.
Q: What do you call a Muslim who owns 6 goats?
A: A pimp.
DFD says
Sorry, you have to key in “goats” under the search tab
Sh. N. says
As long as a Muslim really believes in Islam even if he or she doesn’t look as an extremist, they are potential terrorists.
And that’s because of te tachings of Islam.
DP111 says
No point in executing a couple of Jihadis . The real problem is the mass of moderate Muslims. Once they are a majority, Europe will become Islamic.
We are looking at a civil war, brought to you by the stunning stupidity of our politicians.