Trademarks for Nickname’s of the boss of all terrorists. LOL. Allah is no god but a troublemaker.
Angemonsays
Muhammad was a very peaceful fellow – for the most part he didn’t kill people, he had others kill them for him…
Marcel Berubesays
Not even true . He kill with his own hands and was very proud of it .
To be a real dictator , one needs certain characteristics: have low empathy for others whoever they are, brother, sister, mother, father, uncle , niece , nephew, best friend , wife , son , daughter etc… Then , be very narcissic : me, myself and I and never others first . Third , have a very high score relatively to sadism i.e.having pleasure with others suffering .
Empathy , narcissism and sadism are part of every personnality as masochism. it can be measured by tests made by a psychiatrist . Your results will rank from 1 to 100. As long as you rank from 1 to 50 , it is not problematic for you and your entourage . BUT as you go from 51 to 100 , the more this will cause you anf others around you problems.
Dictators score very high on narcissism, lack of empathy and sadism. Cruelty bring them a lot of satisfaction and pleasure and very less shame, Not anyone can became a dictator , or jihadist . I guess that is why ISIS recrute in prison where some men have made their proof on such matters as sadism, cruelty, lack of empathy and narcissism.
Question: to your opinion where did Mohammed rank on these items? Where jihadists do rank, nowadays ? Is there anyone around you that have great pleasure killing cats and rejoice when they see bad things happening around them? Do they rejoice and laugh when they see someone breaking anything around?
vlparkersays
The perfect man. Yeah, right.
Darryl Kerneysays
hello fellow JW readers, i have a question for you quran experts,
is it true the jihadists are afraid to be killed by a woman because it will deny them entry into “paradise” ?
and if so, what are the quran and/or hadith statements that say so ?
Darryl Kerneysays
oh and also, what about the claims of exposure to pig’s blood etc ?
is there text concerning that ?
I know of no scriptural references on the matter, I have heard weird stories of them wrapping their members in metal so that they will have intact equipment to service their 72 virgin goats, so they are sensitive about that.
And I know IDF have recently covered their jihadi bodies in bacon, and the British have successfully used this tactic in previous wars and the muslims go mad at this, so maybe no hadiths, but they really don’t like this. As for being killed by a female infidel sniper, ouch, that’s going to be bad for moral amongst them.
I have heard of imams spouting the pork and being killed by a women being bad, but I understand all sins are forgiven if they die doing their jihad stuff.
So there is no harm in women killing jihadis, making sure to remove their members and wrapping them in bacon, the more the better.
Wasn’t their prophet killed by an infidel women?
there is no argument about the scriptural backup of the 72 virgins promise by allah to the jihadis, only silly talk of raisins.
Sonjasays
To Mark,
The story about the reward of the 72 virgins is not in the Qu’ran, but it is in the Hadith.The Qu’r an doesn’t give an exact numer of houri’s (Quran 56:35-37).
It is not about raisins, because it says that the virgins will have big boobies and beautiful eyes. They will not have hair (apart from eyebrows and their head) and they will not menstruate or urinate. Last time I checked that didn’t count for raisins.
Not alone do they get (in Jinnah) the virgins, there will also cerculate young boys for them (!). To be able to have sex 24/7 allah will give them the strength for this. The 72 virgins are btw for the muslims that have not been very good, the better muslim gets more virgins.
Koran 76:19 (also in 52:24)
“There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them (as beautiful as) scattered pearls.”
There are many Hadiths saying that there will be houri’s and young boys. Some say that the young boys will be for the female muslims, but I don’t think that is true.
mortimersays
“Mohammed’s success depended on politics, not religion. The Sira, Mohammed’s biography, gives a highly detailed accounting of his rise to power. He preached the religion of Islam for 13 years in Mecca and garnered 150 followers. He was forced to move to Medina and became a politician and warrior. During the last 9 years of his life, he was involved in an event of violence every 6 weeks. When he died every Arab was a Muslim. Mohammed succeeded through politics, not religion.” – Bill Warner
Mohammed’s political movement succeeded by violence, threats and bribery.
Interesting. In opposition to this violence. I think Christianity spread in the Roman Empire and early medieval period through the comfort and confidence in the truth which one can find in the Catholic Faith and tradition.
Enricosays
The false prophet Muhammed from pagan Arabia had probably a handicapped brain. The rush of violence against other men was probably something they just could not miss without they would commit suicide. That is why he rejected God and the Catholic Faith and made up a violent antichrist ideology.
They are just the worst savage, cruel people one can find.
That is why they are imported into the West to combine their madness with certain mentally handicapped folks in Europe to kill or kick out Europeans out of their own countries. It is really a battle of the Catholic Church against rebels against God.
For more on this one could check out vaticancatholic.com
“Extreme Islam”, forgive me if I’m mistaken but doesn’t that mean “extremely Islamic”? Surely one doesn’t need to be an English scholar to see that. If Islam is this supposed “religion of peace ” then wouldn’t Islamic extremists be extremely peaceful?
I believe that, prior to this alleged Mohammad character naming his violent and oppressive form of fascisim that was based purely on his own macabre personal desires, the Arabic word “islam” did not actually mean “peace” as we are deceived into believing. The actual translation was “to surrender if you want peace”, ie if you wish to live then surrender is the only alternative.
Mohammed personally participated in at least one-third of the 60+ jihad campaigns waged during his lifetime keeping 20% of the booty for himself. He even named his swords with the favorite being the
“Zulfiqar”. How many swords did Jesus have and what was his favorite sword?
MOE STARTED IT! He definitely uttered the first death-threats!
Re:”Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.”
The “funny” bit about this passage, is that NOBODY TURNED THE MUSLIMS OUT of their homes! This is only another example of Moe’s preposterous rationalizations and victim-blaming slanderous LIES which he put directly into the mouth of his lying sock-puppet, “allah,” right into his Qur’an!
What really happened, is that Moe had threatened the Meccans with violence, (as in: “I will bring you slaughter!”) simply for verbally contending with his claims, and so they had put him and his followers under house arrest, in Mecca! No out-turnings!
Then, Moe and his men snuck out their back doors and scampered off to Yathrib (“Medina”) where they raided innocent pilgrims’ Mecca-bound caravans for booty, and to later ransom the kidnapped hostages!
Ishaq [183] Guillaume P. 130-131:
Yahya b. ‘Urwa b. al-Zubayr on the authority of his father from’ Abdullah b. ‘Amr b. al-‘As told me that the latter was asked what was the worst way in which Quraysh showed their enmity to the apostle.
He replied: ‘I was with them one day when the notables had gathered in the Hijr and the apostle was mentioned. They said that they had never known anything like the trouble they had endured from this fellow; he had declared their mode of life foolish, insulted their forefathers, reviled their religion, divided the community, and cursed their gods. What they had borne was past all bearing, or words, to that effect.’
While they were thus discussing him the apostle came towards them and kissed the black stone, then he passed them as he walked round the temple.
MORE PROOF MOE KISSED THE BLACK STONE! IDOLATER!
😉
As he passed they said some injurious things about him. This I could see from his expression. He went on and as he passed them the second time they attacked him similarly. This I could see from his expression. Then he passed the third time, and they did the same. He stopped and said, ‘Will you listen to me O Quraysh? By him who holds my life in His hand, I will bring you slaughter.’
THIS IS THE PROOF THAT MOE STARTED IT! HE INITIATED THE VIOLENCE!
Nobody simply came along and “drove the muslims out of their homes” ‘for no reason what so ever!’
Kees says
Trademarks for Nickname’s of the boss of all terrorists. LOL. Allah is no god but a troublemaker.
Angemon says
Muhammad was a very peaceful fellow – for the most part he didn’t kill people, he had others kill them for him…
Marcel Berube says
Not even true . He kill with his own hands and was very proud of it .
To be a real dictator , one needs certain characteristics: have low empathy for others whoever they are, brother, sister, mother, father, uncle , niece , nephew, best friend , wife , son , daughter etc… Then , be very narcissic : me, myself and I and never others first . Third , have a very high score relatively to sadism i.e.having pleasure with others suffering .
Empathy , narcissism and sadism are part of every personnality as masochism. it can be measured by tests made by a psychiatrist . Your results will rank from 1 to 100. As long as you rank from 1 to 50 , it is not problematic for you and your entourage . BUT as you go from 51 to 100 , the more this will cause you anf others around you problems.
Dictators score very high on narcissism, lack of empathy and sadism. Cruelty bring them a lot of satisfaction and pleasure and very less shame, Not anyone can became a dictator , or jihadist . I guess that is why ISIS recrute in prison where some men have made their proof on such matters as sadism, cruelty, lack of empathy and narcissism.
Question: to your opinion where did Mohammed rank on these items? Where jihadists do rank, nowadays ? Is there anyone around you that have great pleasure killing cats and rejoice when they see bad things happening around them? Do they rejoice and laugh when they see someone breaking anything around?
vlparker says
The perfect man. Yeah, right.
Darryl Kerney says
hello fellow JW readers, i have a question for you quran experts,
is it true the jihadists are afraid to be killed by a woman because it will deny them entry into “paradise” ?
and if so, what are the quran and/or hadith statements that say so ?
Darryl Kerney says
oh and also, what about the claims of exposure to pig’s blood etc ?
is there text concerning that ?
marc says
I know of no scriptural references on the matter, I have heard weird stories of them wrapping their members in metal so that they will have intact equipment to service their 72 virgin goats, so they are sensitive about that.
And I know IDF have recently covered their jihadi bodies in bacon, and the British have successfully used this tactic in previous wars and the muslims go mad at this, so maybe no hadiths, but they really don’t like this. As for being killed by a female infidel sniper, ouch, that’s going to be bad for moral amongst them.
I have heard of imams spouting the pork and being killed by a women being bad, but I understand all sins are forgiven if they die doing their jihad stuff.
So there is no harm in women killing jihadis, making sure to remove their members and wrapping them in bacon, the more the better.
Wasn’t their prophet killed by an infidel women?
Darryl Kerney says
i found this,
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/72_Virgins
marc says
there is no argument about the scriptural backup of the 72 virgins promise by allah to the jihadis, only silly talk of raisins.
Sonja says
To Mark,
The story about the reward of the 72 virgins is not in the Qu’ran, but it is in the Hadith.The Qu’r an doesn’t give an exact numer of houri’s (Quran 56:35-37).
It is not about raisins, because it says that the virgins will have big boobies and beautiful eyes. They will not have hair (apart from eyebrows and their head) and they will not menstruate or urinate. Last time I checked that didn’t count for raisins.
Not alone do they get (in Jinnah) the virgins, there will also cerculate young boys for them (!). To be able to have sex 24/7 allah will give them the strength for this. The 72 virgins are btw for the muslims that have not been very good, the better muslim gets more virgins.
Koran 76:19 (also in 52:24)
“There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them (as beautiful as) scattered pearls.”
There are many Hadiths saying that there will be houri’s and young boys. Some say that the young boys will be for the female muslims, but I don’t think that is true.
mortimer says
“Mohammed’s success depended on politics, not religion. The Sira, Mohammed’s biography, gives a highly detailed accounting of his rise to power. He preached the religion of Islam for 13 years in Mecca and garnered 150 followers. He was forced to move to Medina and became a politician and warrior. During the last 9 years of his life, he was involved in an event of violence every 6 weeks. When he died every Arab was a Muslim. Mohammed succeeded through politics, not religion.” – Bill Warner
Mohammed’s political movement succeeded by violence, threats and bribery.
Enrico says
Interesting. In opposition to this violence. I think Christianity spread in the Roman Empire and early medieval period through the comfort and confidence in the truth which one can find in the Catholic Faith and tradition.
Enrico says
The false prophet Muhammed from pagan Arabia had probably a handicapped brain. The rush of violence against other men was probably something they just could not miss without they would commit suicide. That is why he rejected God and the Catholic Faith and made up a violent antichrist ideology.
They are just the worst savage, cruel people one can find.
That is why they are imported into the West to combine their madness with certain mentally handicapped folks in Europe to kill or kick out Europeans out of their own countries. It is really a battle of the Catholic Church against rebels against God.
For more on this one could check out vaticancatholic.com
David says
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/04/26/05/31/accused-sydney-terror-teen-was-part-of-deradicalisation-program
Tim says
“Extreme Islam”, forgive me if I’m mistaken but doesn’t that mean “extremely Islamic”? Surely one doesn’t need to be an English scholar to see that. If Islam is this supposed “religion of peace ” then wouldn’t Islamic extremists be extremely peaceful?
I believe that, prior to this alleged Mohammad character naming his violent and oppressive form of fascisim that was based purely on his own macabre personal desires, the Arabic word “islam” did not actually mean “peace” as we are deceived into believing. The actual translation was “to surrender if you want peace”, ie if you wish to live then surrender is the only alternative.
Charles Martel says
Mohammed personally participated in at least one-third of the 60+ jihad campaigns waged during his lifetime keeping 20% of the booty for himself. He even named his swords with the favorite being the
“Zulfiqar”. How many swords did Jesus have and what was his favorite sword?
UNCLE VLADDI says
MOE STARTED IT! He definitely uttered the first death-threats!
Re:”Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.”
The “funny” bit about this passage, is that NOBODY TURNED THE MUSLIMS OUT of their homes! This is only another example of Moe’s preposterous rationalizations and victim-blaming slanderous LIES which he put directly into the mouth of his lying sock-puppet, “allah,” right into his Qur’an!
What really happened, is that Moe had threatened the Meccans with violence, (as in: “I will bring you slaughter!”) simply for verbally contending with his claims, and so they had put him and his followers under house arrest, in Mecca! No out-turnings!
Then, Moe and his men snuck out their back doors and scampered off to Yathrib (“Medina”) where they raided innocent pilgrims’ Mecca-bound caravans for booty, and to later ransom the kidnapped hostages!
Ishaq [183] Guillaume P. 130-131:
Yahya b. ‘Urwa b. al-Zubayr on the authority of his father from’ Abdullah b. ‘Amr b. al-‘As told me that the latter was asked what was the worst way in which Quraysh showed their enmity to the apostle.
He replied: ‘I was with them one day when the notables had gathered in the Hijr and the apostle was mentioned. They said that they had never known anything like the trouble they had endured from this fellow; he had declared their mode of life foolish, insulted their forefathers, reviled their religion, divided the community, and cursed their gods. What they had borne was past all bearing, or words, to that effect.’
While they were thus discussing him the apostle came towards them and kissed the black stone, then he passed them as he walked round the temple.
MORE PROOF MOE KISSED THE BLACK STONE! IDOLATER!
😉
As he passed they said some injurious things about him. This I could see from his expression. He went on and as he passed them the second time they attacked him similarly. This I could see from his expression. Then he passed the third time, and they did the same. He stopped and said, ‘Will you listen to me O Quraysh? By him who holds my life in His hand, I will bring you slaughter.’
THIS IS THE PROOF THAT MOE STARTED IT! HE INITIATED THE VIOLENCE!
Nobody simply came along and “drove the muslims out of their homes” ‘for no reason what so ever!’