The Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, the Hamas-linked Muslim organization which in 2007 was “named as one of the unindicted co-conspirators in a case against the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation,” describes itself as a civil rights organization: “CAIR is America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.” Sounds good. But CAIR does not “enhance the understanding of Islam” when it claims that “Jihad” means “struggle, struggle for a good cause,” and when Nihad Awad, the National Political Director of CAIR, further misinforms: “[Jihad] is a concept, a noble concept, within Islam that emphasizes a personal struggle within yourself to be a better person, a better husband, better wife, better worker, better neighbor.” In 2013, CAIR took this one step further, with its comical “My Jihad” campaign, consisting of bus ads where a fetching young Muslimah declares what her Jihad is about:
“My jihad is to stay fit despite my busy schedule,” says a woman in a headscarf lifting weights. “What’s yours?”
Your very own Jihad could be anything at all in the personal self-improvement line, from vowing to use the elliptical machine more often, to cutting down your binge-watching of Seinfeld, or even to laying off the Cherry Garcia. All of these jihads turn out to be preposterously peaceful, and none of them has anything to do with the authentic Jihad of the Qur’an, which – as CAIR would prefer that Infidels not comprehend – has to do with a very different “struggle” against the enemy, involving lots of striking at Infidel throats and removal of Infidel heads, with no self-improvement needed and nothing personal about it.
As for encouraging “dialogue,” CAIR is happy to participate in those treacly interfaith gatherings where non-Muslims are given a chance to apologize for the mistreatment of Muslims by “islamophobes,” and CAIR gets a chance to generously accept the apology on behalf of Islam. CAIR also offers, in the same dialoguing spirit, “diversity and sensitivity training” to non-Muslims who, for a price, can learn what they have been doing wrong in interacting with Muslims and are instructed in how to set things right.
CAIR’s “advocacy” for Muslims includes strenuous efforts to silence, through vilification and intimidation, the most prominent critics of Islam. CAIR’s targets have included individuals, such as talk show hosts (Bill Maher), radio commentators (Michael Savage), writer/bloggers (Robert Spencer), columnists (Cal Thomas), apostates (Nonie Darwish), and groups such as Anti-CAIR, the Thomas More Law Center, and the Clarion Project. CAIR also monitors, and complains about, television and movie depictions of Muslims, especially those that might for some bizarre reason suggest a connection between Muslims and terrorism. One example of CAIR’s success in this line was the on-air disclaimer it managed to extract from the star of “24,” a fictional drama about terrorists:
“Hi. My name is Kiefer Sutherland. And I play counter-terrorist agent Jack Bauer on Fox’s 24. I would like to take a moment to talk to you about something that I think is very important. Now while terrorism is obviously one of the most critical challenges facing our nation and the world, it is important to recognize that the American Muslim community stands firmly beside their fellow Americans in denouncing and resisting all forms of terrorism. So in watching 24, please, bear that in mind.”
Instead of encouraging Muslims in America to “stand firmly beside their fellow Americans” in “denouncing and resisting all forms of terrorism,” CAIR tries to persuade American Muslims not to collaborate with the security services. On the website of its California chapter, for example, CAIR posted a picture of “a sinister-looking FBI agent” under the headline “Don’t Talk To The FBI” and “Build A Wall of Resistance.” It has distributed pamphlets in Florida entitled “What to do if the FBI comes for you.” And CAIR’s head in San Francisco advised Muslims that they had no obligation to talk to the F.B.I. CAIR wants to be the intermediary between Muslims and the F.B.I., advising American Muslims on when to talk, and when to remain silent, and what to say to whom and how to phrase or feign things for maximum impact and innocence. It views its relationship with the F.B.I. not as cooperative but as adversarial, and depicts American Muslims as “innocent victims” of an endless “islamophobic” campaign. For CAIR, the F.B.I. – which has gone out of its way to treat CAIR with kid gloves – should be seen by Muslims as an organization to be regarded with deep suspicion, rather than to be enthusiastically aided in its inquiries.
The other day I ran across a “six-months-after-San Bernardino” article about CAIR and the shootings in December 2015. You may remember that as soon as it was known who the Muslim killers were, the head of CAIR’s Los Angeles chapter, Hussam Ayloush, held a news conference saying CAIR would “advise” the family of the suspected killer and terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook. In other words, CAIR would act as intermediary between the family and the world, preparing family members for the questions they would likely be asked, counselling the relatives on when, and what, to respond. Anyone who hoped CAIR would say forthrightly “Tell the F.B.I. everything you know. They’re not out to get you,” was disappointed. CAIR did receive criticism for its behavior at the time; nearly six months later, CAIR’s Ayloush was still unrepentant:
“It is not about what is popular or convenient. We wanted to make sure that no one is punished for the sins of others.”
Thus does CAIR’s attempt to inject itself into a terrorism investigation, but not for the purposes of furthering that investigation, become a ludicrous example of Standing Up For What’s Right, Whatever The Cost: “It is not about what is popular or convenient.” Precisely what noble principle is being upheld by getting in the way of the F.B.I. is entirely unclear. But we are expected to believe that precisely because it is “not about what is popular or convenient,” it must therefore be admirable. And there is more from this theatre of the absurd: “We wanted to make sure that no one is punished for the sins of others.” This is CAIR’s way of saying: “We wanted to make sure that no Muslims are punished for the acts of other Muslims.” It would be especially horrific to “punish” the Muslim community by tarring it with the brush of suspected ties to terrorism, since we know – because CAIR keeps telling us — that such attacks as those at San Bernardino and Fort Hood, like all attacks by Muslim terrorists, “have nothing to do with Islam,” but are the result of “a twisted mind-set” (repeat both ad libitum).
One wonders if Hussam Ayloush can adduce a single example of the F.B.I. or any other government agency attempting to punish a Muslim “for the sins of others.” The egregious Mark Juergensmeyer, “an expert in religious studies at the University of California” and a defender of CAIR, claims that CAIR is criticized because there is “strong public perception that being Muslim leads to terrorism.” Really? Only in CAIR’s grotesque caricature of an “islamophobe.” Surely CAIR’s many links to Hamas, CAIR’s involvement with the Holy Land Foundation, CAIR’s campaign to misinform the public about the nature of Jihad, CAIR’s attempt to keep Muslims from cooperating with the FBI, CAIR’s efforts to intimidate and silence those who know too much about Islam and share that knowledge, are sufficient to explain criticism of CAIR, and not that putative, or rather non-existent, “public perception that being Muslim leads to terrorism.” And channeling Ayloush, Juergensmeyer maintains that it’s “CAIR [that has] a concern that the family [of Farook] not be tarred with public perception, that innocent victims not be deprived of their liberties because of the acts of a few.” But no “innocent victims” have been, or could be, deprived of “their liberties” – all the F.B.I. wanted to do was to talk to family members to find out as much as they could about the killers, both of whom were dead and thus unavailable for questioning. It is no different from the procedure they follow with relatives when non-Muslim killers are unavailable for questioning.
Hussam Ayloush asked Farook’s brother-in-law a series of questions: “Was there anything unusual about Farook’s life? Did he have a gun? Was he a member of the Islamic State?” The answers are not given in the article, but Ayloush does report, in friendly-colloquial-innocuous fashion, that he learned from Farook’s brother-in-law Farhan Khan that Farook had made the hajj and that his wife was born in Pakistan. (Ayloush: “His wife was born in Pakistan? Great, that’s going to be mentioned” [so be ready to talk about that].) Why would he be asking these questions, if not to help prepare Khan and his wife for their meeting with the F.B.I.? “I was looking at what to expect,” said Ayloush, meaning by this: “I was preparing them [Farook’s relatives] for what they should expect.” But why should CAIR feel the need to “prepare” them at all?
The “innocent victim” theme is played for all it is worth. All through December, Ayloush says he would frequently call or stop at Khan’s house “to make sure the family wasn’t being harassed.” But there are no reports of the family being harassed, or threatened with harassment, by anyone. Ayloush’s expressed fears usefully contribute, however, to CAIR’s “victimization” script. If you need to “make sure the family wasn’t being harassed,” this implies the existence of that worrisome possibility; it creates a phantasmagoric fear that can only be assuaged by Ayloush’s solicitous “checking up on” the family.
Then there is this maudlin masterpiece: on one of Ayloush’s visits (to check on the “innocent victims”), he noticed Khan’s “children on the floor eating candy.” Why? he wondered. Their mother told him “that they had run out of food because they didn’t feel comfortable leaving the home to shop for groceries.” The clear implication is that they lived in such fear of islamophobes that they dared not leave the house, not even to shop for milk and eggs. The story sounds doubtful. But suppose it were true. Was such a worry reasonable? Has there been a single case in the U.S. of attacks by maddened Infidels on relatives of Muslim terrorists? The touching aspect of the tale, the one that is supposed to tug at your heartstrings, is that suffer-the-little-children theme, with the Khan children reduced to sitting “on the floor eating candy.” Ayloush exclaims: “Oh, my God, at the end of the day, this is a family. This is not a media center; this is a family that actually has been unable to conduct their normal life.” But there was no “media center” disruption: during the first week after the killing (let’s not forget about those killings, in all of our concern for the Khan family), a few “reporters stood watch outside” – no frenzied paparazzi mob — and after that week, they apparently left. The family, Ayloush says, “has been unable to conduct their normal life.” Why? No threats of any kind were made against the family (how do we know? we know because had there been any such threats, CAIR would certainly have proclaimed them urbi et orbi). If the parents were too fearful to go grocery shopping, despite the absence of any threats, that is their problem. Or more exactly, that is the problem they have with CAIR itself, which for its own purposes stokes the very fears it claims to want to quell. CAIR, after all, exploits the victimisation narrative it has created to make non-Muslims feel ashamed of their “suspicion” of “innocent Muslims” and, as always, to divert attention from Islam itself.
Meanwhile, somewhere in this land of ours, sinister F.B.I. agents are hovering, frightened Muslim children are enduring having to eat candy on the floor, and CAIR is girding its loins for battle — once more unto the breach! — against the security services and islamophobes on behalf of innocent Muslim victims, having long ago adopted as its theme song Duke Ellington’s “Do nothing till you hear from me.”

jihad3tracker says
There are FBI and NSA employees who are NOT fooled by CAIR — and they track every single thing which that nest of human slime does, 24/7, all locations..
Patience may be required by us, yes, but eventually there will be charges brought, and convictions — especially after Trump is elected and get high-level briefings.
Chris says
I think they are just waiting for O bumble butt to be out of office, and get him along with the rest..
Chris says
Maybe, maybe not.. everything is a jumble these days… so confusing!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Do the vigilant special agents at the FBI to whom you refer include the thousand or so Moslem hires the agency made during its Moslem outreach program under Affirmative Action law just after 9/11?
gravenimage says
Yes, APF–the barbarians are not merely withing the gates, but have infiltrated the night watch, as well..
Custos Custodum says
Nicely put! Sadly, 90% of the population has no conception of the extent of the institutional rot at the highest reaches of government (which goes back at least to Bush Sr. and got worse under each administration, but was taken to a “new level” by Barry’s gang).
Custos Custodum says
Any Americans left in our secret services and law enforcement agencies, they should work quickly and effectively to exfiltrate all relevant information for use outside the purview of government. The other side is working hard to destroy, corrupt or suppress all data deemed unhelpful to its cause.
As we all know, under the current regime and its “independent” helpmates, senior (and not so senior) officials suspected of pro-American sympathies are liable to be purged at any time, often under some defamatory pretext.
Jay Boo says
How dare they say “Don’t talk to the FBI”
Have they no shame at all?
Pat Condel on CAIR and I-phobia
Mubarak says
I politely disagree with Pat Condell:
Islamophobia exists as a psychological projection and for a very valid reason: if a Muslim decides to abandon his religion, he or she can – with the approval and recommendation of Islamic tradition – be killed. This potential threat generates understandably a latent islamophobia in all Muslims, and that is how we should understand and explain the inception and conception of the term.
gravenimage says
Except, of course, that this is bs. “Islamophobia” is not about how Muslims or Muslim apostates feel about Islam at all.
Instead, it was a phrase ginned up by the Muslim Brotherhood to imply that Infidels who are concerned about the violence of Islam are irrationally phobic and ‘racist’ about this creed:
“How the term ‘Islamophobia’ got shoved down your throat”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/11/how-the-term-islamophobia-got-shoved-down-your-throat
But what else would we expect but obfuscation from Mubarak–an apologist for Muslim rape?
Jay Boo says
Oh my goodness. Mubarak. We have it all wrong.
Muslims are victims because they are afraid of Islam.
These poor Muslims are slaves to Allah’s will.
It is Allah’s fault.
Who else but a MUSLIM would come up with an pathetic excuse like:
“He said that raping me is his prayer to God (Allah)”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/he-said-that-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god
hmmm says
Mr. Condell is correct, clearly the term is manufactured and aimed at Westerners by islamic supremacists to silence, shame critics of oppressive islamic theocracy, violently enforced with sharia law, into giving up first amendment rights. the rest of sharia law to follow, one step at a time.
gravenimage says
More good stuff from Pat Condell. Thanks for posting this, Jay Boo.
Mubarak says
Islam is the religion par excellence that employs fear in its service. What could be more obvious than to suggest, that islamophobia is a projection of that fear?
gravenimage says
Except it is not. “Islamophobia” was a term ginned up by Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups to imply that concerns over Islamic violence and oppression are nothing but irrational bigotry.
Mubarak knows this–but hopes we do not.
Joel Shapiro says
Ironic that the word chosen by Muslim apologists to translate Jihad is “struggle.” How could they not know that this is exact same word used to translate the German term “Kampf” — most famously used in Hitler’s Mein Kampf (“My Struggle”)? Hmmm.
Guest says
Jihad only means one thing now: war crime.
JawsV says
“Hi. My name is Kiefer Sutherland. And I play counter-terrorist agent Jack Bauer on Fox’s 24. I would like to take a moment to talk to you about something that I think is very important. Now while terrorism is obviously one of the most critical challenges facing our nation and the world, it is important to recognize that the American Muslim community stands firmly beside their fellow Americans in denouncing and resisting all forms of terrorism. So in watching 24, please, bear that in mind.”
No wonder I was never interested in watching “24.” I did once and I saw it was Islam-groveling so that was the end.
gravenimage says
From what I have heard, the show started out well, and then was more and more compromised.
Hope says
CAIR is a nest of vipers. Hey,CAIR, your boy Obama bin Lyin’ will be out of office in 239 days, which means you a**holes should start packing too.
My jihad is preventing the islamization of America so that my descendents can live their lives in freedom and peace. What’s yours?
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
“[Jihad] is a concept, a noble concept, within Islam that emphasizes a personal struggle within yourself …”
If that’s true, then why is there a chapter in the Holy Ko-Ran with Allah detailing exemptions from Jihad for the elderly, the handicapped, the very ill and others? If what CAIR says is true, and Jihad is a noble internal struggle to be a better person, then is it that Allah is saying that the internal struggle is too much of a strain for old folks, handicapped people and the very ill?
Or is CAIR lying? Could be. Or, it could just be that Allah is a mentally incompetent God, mentally retarded maybe, and that CAIR and those two Infidel professors from the War College are right and Allah has it all wrong.
Jaladhi says
No mystery here – Muslims are confirmed liars!!
marble says
Just a remark regarding the fable of Muslim children dining on candy from the floor of their home for fear of Islamophobes, that would be the common condition of Christian and Jewish families daily existence in Muslim countries. Coming to a neighbourhood near you if sharia becomes your law.
somehistory says
Where I come from, having candy is a treat. We might even sit on the floor to eat it if we had company taking up all of the chairs and sofa seats.
And isn’t there the practice among those approving of terror of passing out candy to everyone when terrorists act? Like right after 9/11 and when Jews are murdered in Israel.
somehistory says
One thing I didn’t see mentioned in the article is the lawsuit thingy cair does.
Anytime any moslim has a job somewhere, cair is at the ready to encourage work disruption in order for the moslim to be *written up* or *fired for not doing the job* or *not allowed to wear sandals or scarf* of choice to work, and then suing to make money and get their way.
Or even play, as in race cars where long scarves may get entangled in wheels and axles and carry out a *race car wheel **struggle** against the moslim wearing said scarf, nicely providing the woman to really struggle. And if she lives, sue.
They have been all over the map with the law suits and threats of law suits…clock boy, Disney ‘scarf, ‘I don’t want to work behind the scenes’ girl’, …and on and on.
Is there a cair *hotline* number posted in every barracks so any moslim can quickly contact them? Kind of like the infidel’s 911 for emergencies.
billybob says
USA SOCIETY
First Look
Are employers required to grant Muslim employees prayer breaks?
A dispute between Somali Muslim workers and a Wisconsin manufacturing plant has centered around prayer breaks, as CAIR has filed a religious discrimination complaint on the workers’ behalf.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/0525/Are-employers-required-to-grant-Muslim-employees-prayer-breaks
somehistory says
I was thinking about that very issue when writing my comment, but couldn’t recall the name of the tractor/lawn mower company.
cair says because they had been giving prayer breaks, they have to continue to give them, although the company says it costs too much money to have so many taking that many breaks at the same time for that long.
The rule is that it has to be *reasonable accommodation* not that the company has to go broke to provide their employees with a place to *prey.*
Trico says
. “My jihad is to figure out how I can make my new Bacon Product Halal Certified.
Mubarak says
Maybe this guy could help you?
https://youtu.be/yJgTIg21riA
Angemon says
I don’t know – something about celebrating “palestinians” killing Israelis?
Well, what were the parents eating? Were they going out to work?
Dennis says
The men of CAIR should have gone shopping for the family. Except that shopping is womans work in their religion.
gravenimage says
Not everywhere. In the most Islamic places Purdah is so extreme that women are rarely allowed to leave the house, even to shop.
Trico says
“”Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”
− Ohmar Ahmad, co-founder of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations)
–
Ayaan Hirsi Ali on her book Nomad: From Islam to America: A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations.
-“While a handful of state legislators and city officials have been receptive and sympathetic to residents’ concerns, the reaction is often hostile from the community organizers, she said. “They call us all kinds of names, like Islamophobes, and I think CAIR is behind it,” she said, referring to the Council on American-Islamic Relations”.
“’I think political correctness will destroy us. The Muslim Brotherhood, they said it in their Explanatory Memorandum (seized by the FBI as evidence in 2004 from a house in Virginia), that they will destroy us from within using immigration and political correctness as a weapon, and they are using it very aggressively at this time.'”
jewdog says
The UAE lists CAIR as a terrorist organization, probably because of its ties to the MB and Hamas.
CAIR’s emphasis is on Muslim victimhood after terrorist attacks. That fits the pattern of insouciance for infidel victims seen in Muslim countries. For example, the killer of Taylor Force, the American tourist, has been glorified as a martyr by the PA. And that’s typical.
Mach1Duck says
Write your Congressmen or Senators to pass HR.3892 and S.2230 which declares the Muslim Brother Hood and all its subsidiaries terrorist organizations (this includes CAIR). Then give all those members 24 hours to leave the country or be prosecuted as terrorist.
livingengine says
gravenimage says
Yes–a great Infidel lady!
citycat says
Council of American Islamic Relations
why not Christian Islamic, or Jewish Islamic, or west east. I assumed CAIR to be in the east, but it’s on Capitol Hill.
Have the Buddhists got a place there too?
The cancer has taken root.
Next is Ameristan.
CAIR is treachery to infidels, i guess.
CAIR holds no logical water with regard to Humanity evolving into Human.
Islamic means being kept stuck below sex level, with a brain on top.
Mubarak says
It takes an incredible amount of self deception to persuade oneself and others that anything good can come from a religion who’s founder was a war criminal, a murderer, a pedophile, a polygamist, an anti-Semite, a plagiarist and a mountebank. It is in the cards that mischief in the land is bound to follow in the wake of such a beginning. The insane circulations around a black stone in Mecca illustrates that this evil supported by nonsense has a powerful hypnotic effect on ordinary people and the ability to mislead the crowds of millions – and House of Saud exploits the nonsense to the fullest.
But during the centuries accumulated cultural investments in this hoax has generated an equally accumulated dread of what a realization of this fact would instigate. To pull the rug from under the feet of millions of violent disposed Muslims would create an identity crisis that the world would not be able to cope with, so the political leaders of the world walk on eggshells in order not to offend Muslims and especially Muslim leaders in the grip of this delusion.
But the farce can’t go on forever. Tension has built. The mr. Hyde face of Islam has become too frequent to be explained away, and it will continue to surface – until CAIR & Company hear from us.
gravenimage says
Says the Mohammedan who has lauded his fellow Muslims raping us, beginning on New Year’s Eve. He is trying to appear more plausible here, but we have no reason to trust him.
Here’s one of his earliest posts, where Mubarak is blaming Western women for being raped by Muslims:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853
Here’s some ugliness from a couple of months ago:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/hugh-fitzgerald-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god-its-allowed-its-halal#comment-1398831
He has also said that if we are true Christians, then we will let in floods more Muslims who can rape us so we will “atone” for our sins.
Lots more ugliness from him in the JW archives.
Custos Custodum says
Thanks, GI, for your persistent and unflagging vigilance!
gravenimage says
Thank you, Custos!
Jay Boo says
Thanks GI
Sneaky Mubarak begins off topic with:
“It takes an incredible amount of self deception”
Self deception ???
This article of course is about — (CAIR deception).
Mubarak says
Gi reacts as an enraged dog defending its home range, when someone transcends his predictable and automated comments and infringe upon his diocese.
Angemon says
I don’t expect you, being a muslim, to know anything about dogs, Mubarak, but enraged dogs make poor watchdogs. Anyway, do explain us how kowtowing to muslim violence is the way to end muslim violence.
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
Gi reacts as an enraged dog defending its home range, when someone transcends his predictable and automated comments and infringe upon his diocese.
……………………………..
This is not specifically my “home range”–this is the “home range” of any good people who stand against the depredations of Jihad. Nor is it my “diocese”–interesting that he would choose to use a Christian reference here.
Mubarak pretends that counseling us to roll over for Islam is–somehow–just ‘thinking outside the box’–but it is not.
It is urging us to surrender to Islam–and that is what is *really* predictable coming from a Mohammedan.
Notice that he cannot really counter anything I have to say about him and his appalling posting history here–so he has to resort to calling me an “enraged dog”. Ad hominem attacks are always the last resort of those who have no other argument.
But this is not the insult Mubarak believes it to be. There is the analogy of the wolf, the sheep, and the sheep dog who acts to protect the sheep against the ravening wolves.
I proudly accept that role, and will execute it to the best of my abilities.
One small point: I have several times pointed out to Mubarak that I am not a he, but a she. I suppose he is too humiliated to think that it is a woman who dares call him on his bs.
gravenimage says
Excellent post, Angemon.
gravenimage says
Here’s some more, where Mubarak is upset that we are on to him:
Mubarak says
March 16, 2016 at 5:35 pm
Europe, and especially Eastern Europe, excel in the production of cheap young women. In every big city they populate the sidewalks mirroring themselves in the windows of commercial centers and the eyes of passers-by.
What does it take to break the curse and dehumanization of these young women, if not another race of cursed young men of Muslim origin, who cannot understand that these half naked or sausages clothed gargoyles – many of them pierced and tattooed with green or purple hair or no hair at all – are not up for grabs?
Any suggestions “grievousimage”?
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/hugh-fitzgerald-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god-its-allowed-its-halal#comment-1397950
Lots more from him on that thread, where the mask slips quite badly.
Nasty, nasty stuff. Mubarak is no Anti-Jihadist.
Mubarak says
What a naive understanding that jihadists can be overcome by the decadence of the West in alliance with and lead by feminists and progressives! Get rid of that and Islam will retreat proportionally. The fight is twofold!
gravenimage says
The meretricious Mubarak wrote:
Get rid of that and Islam will retreat proportionally. The fight is twofold!
…………………..
What absolute crap. This is just more of the same–that Muslims are attacking us because we have Victoria’s Secret ads and because we allow women to go to New Year’s Eve celebrations (both things Mubarak has specifically cited), and that if only we began to impose Muslim morality that Islam will “retreat proportionally”.
But Islam has targeted Infidels for 1400 years now–and holds devout Christians and Jews and Hindus in just as much contempt as it does agnostic party girls.
If Muslims are attacking us because we are (supposedly) so decadent, then why are Muslims enslaving culturally conservative Yezidi girls in the Islamic State? Why are they breaking into convents and raping elderly nuns in India? Why are they blowing up churches in Nigeria?
I’ve asked Mubarak these questions many times before–and he always chooses to ignore them.
And why not? He has no answers for them.
His whole purpose here is to try to convince Anti-Jihadists that if only we adopt Shari’ah strictures, that Muslims will leave us alone.
A particularly ugly form of stealth Jihad–but one we have seen practiced many times before. *Ugh*.
And one more thing: the West, with all her shortcomings, is *far* more moral than is Islam.
The idea that Islam is “moral” is false and sickening. Islam allows child marriage and the rape of small boys–this last he also grotesquely blamed on the West, here:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/germany-muslim-migrant-sexually-assaults-6-year-old-boy-in-changing-room#comment-1433792
Islam allows polygamy and summary divorce for men. It allows wife beating and “Honor Killing”.
Islam allows the wholesale rape of Infidels. It allows sex slavery. It sacralizes nonbelievers being raped, robbed, and murdered.
There is *nothing* like this in the West. The idea that there is anything “modest” or “moral” about this is perverse beyond belief–but this is what the vile Mubarak wants us to swallow.
Jay Boo says
No Mubarak
The real decadence is within Islam.
It is rotting from within and (No god but Allah) Islam’s fungus green veil can no longer hide Islam’s stench that rests on the putrid foundation of Muhammad as its example.
Muslims always blame others in a desperate attempt to prop up a vile ideology with hate to avoid admitting that Islam has no base.
It is like shoveling Islamic sh-tholes against the rising tide of truth.
gravenimage says
Hear hear, Jay Boo!
Jay Boo says
Good morning interfaith class.
For today’s myjihad kindergarten Show & Tell we have a very special guest dug up from the past to tell us about his book of revelation, the Qur’an. Who wants to be first to sit on the Prophet’s lap to help him get one of his revelations? Doesn’t anyone wish to sit on his lap for a madrassa lesson?
Don’t be so Islamophobic children. This is so embarrassing.
They are just bashful.
Trico says
Can I ask the Prophet, peace be upon him a question?
Muhammad, peace be upon you, how is it you were able to fit into 6 year old Aisha’s clothing?
Jay Boo says
Aisha was reportedly about 18 or 19 years old at Muhammad’s death.
Trico says
“Aisha was reportedly about 18 or 19 years old at Muhammad’s death.
Presumably , as Aisha’s husband. Muhammad inherited Aisha’s wardrobe.
Hope says
OMG, this one made me laugh, Jay Boo.
BBistawros says
CAIR is trying to sell you a product that does not exist.
Islam has been and always will be a religion of WAR and NEVER a religion of PEACE. That is the teaching of the Koran. What CAIR says mean nothing. Deception and manipulation and lies are the name of the game and they know it too well.
We need more Americans to learn about the danger of Islam to America.
The only solution is to stop the immigration of Muslims and start the deportation of most Muslims out of the U.S.
Americans don’t have to see the shedding of Innocent blood to get it. Look out the window, do you see what ISIS is doing in the Middle East? That is ISLAM. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and deceiver.
Mach1Duck says
The four schools of Islamic law (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi, and Hanabli) all agree that laws drawing their authority from the Qur’an or hadith are part of a fixed body of law that remains eternal and not subject to change. The primary goal of the Muslim community…is to spread the word of Allah through jihad, and the option of the poll tax (jizyah) is to be exercised only after subjugation.
Proud Islamophobe says
Islamophobia is the thinking person’s reaction to Infidelophobia