• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hugh Fitzgerald: “Convenience Conversions” and an Inconvenient Truth

May 22, 2016 11:05 am By Hugh Fitzgerald

Lithgow Prison

Prisoners at Kariong Prison in New South Wales (Australia) have recently complained that they have been threatened by Muslim inmates with violence unless they convert to Islam. The same threats have been reported from at least two other prisons in Australia, and from Great Britain, France, and other European countries with Muslim populations greater than 2-3%. Muslims now constitute a significant percentage of the prison population in Europe, much higher than their percentage in the general population (and both percentages are growing rapidly). For example, Muslims are at present 5% of the British population, 15% of the prison population, and 44% of those in maximum security prisons. In France, they are 8% of the population, and 70% of the prison population. In Germany, they are 6.5% of the population and over 30% of the prison population.

Muslims may be outnumbered by the non-Muslim prisoners, but they constitute a determined and violent bloc; some would call them a “gang.” The non-Muslims they target are literally a captive audience. Muslim prisoners are able to threaten with impunity the non-Muslim prisoners who, far from being protected by the prison authorities, are left to shift for themselves. And it looks like the threats are working. As one report put it, “The demands for halal food and Korans and prayer mats by non-Arab inmates are increasing.” This kind of conversion, to ensure better treatment and above all, protection from violence, including that from Muslims, has even been given a name: “convenience conversion.”

“Steve McMahon, chairman of Public Service Association Corrections branch [in Sydney], said the forced conversions are likely ‘extremist-related’ [but] ‘these people are clearly doing it for some reasons other than their devotion to the faith and it is concerning in light of how dangerous some of these individuals have become,’ he told The Daily Telegraph, adding that Muslims in prison are ‘not upstanding citizens’ who don’t believe in violence”.

So, on the one hand, according to this official, these “forced conversions” are said to be “[Muslim] extremist-related.” But at the same time, he insists that “they are clearly doing it for some reasons other than their devotion to the faith.” Is he quite sure? Hasn’t the history of Islam been that of non-Muslims converting initially for reasons “other than devotion to the faith” but, over time, reconciling themselves to what had been imposed upon them and becoming in the end true believers? What has Islam been, over the past 1300 years, for the non-Muslims whose lands were conquered and who were then subjugated, and either killed or converted or had the Jizyah exacted from them by their conquerors, if not both an extortion racket and a faith?

Of course, some of the Australian prison authorities might be laboring under the impression that the prisoners who are converting are doing so of their own free will, and that they have no business interfering in an inmate’s choice of religion. Their reluctance to act decisively could also be a defeatist admission of fear: we don’t dare antagonize Muslim prisoners — who “are not upstanding citizens who don’t believe in violence” — by attempting to prevent their campaigns of conversion. Besides, the most immediate worry for the West in prisons is not that of forced conversion to Islam, but the “radicalization of those who are already Muslims,” especially effective in prisons, where young inmates are ‘in awe of convicted terrorists’” (from the 2012 report on Islamisation in prisons by the Cambridge criminologist Alison Liebling).

The same problem of “convenience conversions” has long plagued prisons in Britain.

Here is the story of one holdout:

One young woman whose brother is serving a lengthy sentence in a top security prison in England told how he was being bullied by members of a Muslim gang who were trying to force him to convert to Islam.

“He just looks like a broken man,” she said, again asking not to be identified. “He’s tearful on visits, and I’m just really scared for him. He’s been physically assaulted. He’s had black eyes. In the showers, he got threatened with a knife.

“He’s not going to back down. He’s not going to convert for anyone. He just spends his time hiding in his cell. He’s got at least another five years to serve. I don’t know how much longer he can hold out.”

And another describes the protection offered, against both Muslims and non-Muslims:

Another serving prisoner told the Mail: “Some people really struggle when they come in to prison. They will try to find some support — and the Muslim groups offer that. A lot of black men in their early 20s who are in on violence or drug charges are targeted.

“They would maybe have been part of gangs for a long time. But in prison, they’re on their own. I’ve seen guys who’ve been beaten up or bullied, had their fags nicked and their cells turned over, that sort of thing, and then they’ll be befriended by some of the Muslims.

“Then the guy will put in a formal request saying that he wants to change his religion. He might have a meeting with the governor and he goes through the process of becoming a Muslim. Everyone knows why they are doing it — it’s not as if they have suddenly found God.”

When a prisoner converts to Islam, it’s like joining a gang — you have ready-made Muslim “brothers” who will stick by you and protect you, including offering protection from themselves. This kind of protection from physical or other harm resembles Mafia tactics, where they extort protection money against damage that they themselves could inflict on the victim; the Mafia originates in Sicily, which for several centuries was under Muslim domination and influence.

But one British prison official said: “These gangs use their faith as a cover for violence and intimidation, threatening non-Muslims and pressuring them to convert to Islam.”

Again, here we have officials refusing to take Islam seriously as the explanation for Muslim behavior: “These gangs use their faith as a cover for violence and intimidation.” Rather, it’s the opposite: their faith is not a mere “cover,” i.e., excuse, but the reason for the violence and intimidation [of non-Muslims]. The refusal to recognize the nature of Islam keeps getting in the way of satisfactory analysis.

The most optimistic view of these prison conversions is that they are not sincere. The very word “convenience” suggests that this conversion is ephemeral, a temporary accommodation with a difficult reality from which there is at present no escape, and implicitly, as soon as the prisoner-converts are freed, they will slough off their “conversions” at the prison gates. They are, our security services must hopefully assume, feigning belief, asking for those Korans and prayer mats and halal food only as props for their act, and not because they are true enthusiasts. And, especially in the case of the great increase in halal food requests, those authorities may have a point. Such diet requests do not necessarily bespeak an equal rise in real conversions. Whenever there are alternatives to a standard menu, those choices are often rumored to be better fare. Think of how the special menus on airplanes — kosher, halal, vegetarian – are widely assumed to be prepared with more culinary flair than whatever is on the standard menu. Inmates make the same assumption about their prison food; halal meals are reputed to be better than the regular fare; professing Islam may only be the justification for demanding them. This is the least dangerous kind of “convenience conversion,” and as long as it is insincere, need not be cause for alarm.

If most of these “convenience conversions” are in fact temporary, of going along to get along while in prison, that would be some relief. I have been unable to find any statistics on how long these prison conversions last once the “believer” is out of prison. This is understandable. If Western governments are able to collect such information, they obviously would not want it known; just imagine the howls of outrage from CAIR and its camp-followers if they did. But I find plausible the suggestion that some of those prisoners who converted in prison originally out of fear of Muslim threats, subsequently try to justify their own behavior — to themselves — by finding things about Islam that will make them think better of the faith, and therefore, of themselves; they manage to convince themselves that their original “conversion” was genuine. First feigning to be converts, they then become converts in truth, and even, in some cases, enthusiastic promoters of the faith which has provided them with an Instant Brotherhood, a Complete Regulation of Daily Life, and a Total Explanation of the Universe, all of great psychic comfort for people in (and out of) prison. These prison converts in the West who do not slough off Islam once they are out of prison, but become true believers, swelling the ranks of the faithful, are a worry.

But aren’t Muslims embarrassed by this use of threats to gain prison converts? Not at all. No prominent Muslims have spoken out against this. From their point of view, since it is only through Islam that men learn and practice righteousness, bringing them to Islam is the greatest benefit that can be lavished upon them. Why should they care what instrument is employed to attain that worthy end? These prison conversions are now a permanent problem for the West’s security services, with no solution or amelioration in sight. And since most of these prisoners are already schooled in violence, they are likely to be more susceptible to recruitment as future Jihadis. And the matter gets nothing like the attention it deserves from the security services.

Just imagine, by contrast, what the reaction of practically all right-thinking people would be to reports that Christian prisoners were making systematic attempts to convert Muslim prisoners through the threat of violence. From sea to shining sea there would be a storm of nonstop outrage on the airwaves and the Internet that nothing could assuage, with Christian clergymen in the lead. But that hypothetical, of course, is absurd. There have been no reports, in or out of prison, of Christians threatening Muslims with violence unless they convert to Christianity.

What if the authorities in the United States were to establish all-Muslim prisons, or Muslim-only areas within prisons, in order to protect the non-Muslim prisoners from the threat of conversion by force? If they did so, a constitutional challenge brought under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, claiming a violation of the Equal Protection Clause (which applies to the Federal government through the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment), would likely succeed, given that the highest level of review, Strict Scrutiny, would be triggered by the putative “religious” discrimination, and the government would have to meet the requirement of a “compelling state interest” that would justify such segregation. It’s doubtful that such segregation, in order to prevent “forcible” conversions to Islam in prisons for security reasons, would constitute for this Court a “compelling state interest.” For the government would have to explain those “security reasons,” meaning it would have to admit what sensible people recognize to be true but are not allowed in this political climate to publicly state: the more prison conversions, the more Muslims in our society; the more Muslims in our society, the more physically insecure life becomes for non-Muslims.

This leaves prison authorities in the U.S., as elsewhere in the West, with an ever-growing security threat of converts to Islam from among the most dangerous segments of society, and with the only measure likely to be effective in preventing convenience conversions — that is, segregation according to faith — impossible to undertake. That’s the inconvenient truth. And Muslims, who watch as their numbers increase from yet one more variety of “adult-onset Islam,” will have had the last laugh, the one provided them by Qur’an 2:256: “There shall be no compulsion in religion.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Australia, converts to Islam, Featured, Hugh Fitzgerald, Jihad in prisons, United Kingdom Tagged With: halal, Kariong Prison


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. wtd says

    May 22, 2016 at 11:30 am

    wiki: Loss of rights due to conviction for criminal offense
    If a confined criminal can be legally disenfranchised from voting in elections, they also should be disenfranchised from any form of outside influence, including religious. Any form of non-state-disciplinary propaganda should be eliminated from prisons. Any indication of gang alliance should be immediately broken and put into isolation, permanently if and as necessary.

    • Shane says

      May 23, 2016 at 10:45 am

      Islam is a curse on all humanity, even for guys in prison!

  2. Angemon says

    May 22, 2016 at 11:31 am

    had their fags nicked

    For those not familiar with British slang, this means they had their cigarettes stolen.

  3. Tim says

    May 22, 2016 at 11:31 am

    Alarming just like the mafia in Southern Italy who have morals and values like Muslims but being only clean shaven and wearing expensive cloths. The Sicilians are very similar to Muslims even there family and marriage traditions is like Muslims.

    • WorkingClassPost says

      May 22, 2016 at 1:06 pm

      Perhaps Sicily needed to have an inquisition when the Arabs were driven out.

      Spain might be a very different place today if they had not done so.

  4. William says

    May 22, 2016 at 1:06 pm

    The outcome may be the same, but aren’t we seeing, historically, a new set of potential converts to Mohammedanism? In the past, the Mohammedans conquered and caused to become Mohammedans people who held to particular religious beliefs. In the Levant and North Africa, the new converts were previously Christians. In other lands, they held to their native beliefs such as Hinduism,, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, etc. Even in sub-Saharan Africa, the natives held certain beliefs in nature. Today in the West, there is a new phenomenon. It is large populations without any belief in a supernatural being or force, whether they be agnostics, atheists, or those who have never given belief in such things any consideration. The westerners are like blank slates. If this is correct, aren’t the Mohammedans having an easier time successfully proselytizing westerners?

    • Bob says

      May 23, 2016 at 10:17 am

      Of course, William, Islam is able to fill the anti-Christian secularist vacuum, & nothing is being done to prevent the move. Western politicos’re afraid of muslim riots in the streets.

  5. Guest says

    May 22, 2016 at 1:31 pm

    Beating prisoners for misbehaving is what wardens and prison guards are for.

  6. Tom_S says

    May 22, 2016 at 2:13 pm

    another aspect is the future utility of a “convenience convert”. While someone who converts for “whatever” may not practice, or consider themselves part of the Ummah the True Believers that they associated with will remember. One, five, ten years a Mujahedeen shows up and needs to borrow a car, requires, a Trac-phone bought at Walmart, a place to stay hidden for a couple of days. The “whatever” is part of the Ummah and, no matter how much a back slider they may be, know that they are obligated to comply: they also remember that there are no idle threats from this group, that to fail to aid is apostasy and what the penalty for that is. Even more so than “moderate” Mohammedans they become an under-the-radar resource for later operations.
    The major difference between the Sicilian Mafia and the New World variant is that the original requires, and enforces, loyalty and obedience for their own sake while in America profit is the cement that holds things together.

  7. mortimer says

    May 22, 2016 at 3:57 pm

    Tut, tut, Mickey. Human rights are for all.

    • Jay Boo says

      May 22, 2016 at 4:12 pm

      @Mickey

      Mortimer loves to get on his high horse and scold.

  8. livingengine says

    May 22, 2016 at 3:57 pm

    From the Best of Hugh Fitzgerald
    ” During the Biafra War of 1967-1969, which was triggered by a massacre by Muslims of Christians, the entire Western world stood by and allowed the Muslims of the North to slaughter the Christian, mainly Ibo, south. These Muslims were aided by outside Muslims, including Egyptian pilots who strafed and bombed Ibo villages, killing tens of thousands — without any opposition, anti-aircraft fire, anything.

    The war was brought on by the Jihad against the Christian Ibo and other Christian peoples of southern Nigeria by the Hausa and Fulani Muslims of the north (Islam itself was spread most recently in the 1804 Jihad declared by Othman Dan Fodio), and by the desperate attempt of the Ibo (Igbo) people to free themselves from Muslim aggression. Tens of thousands of civilians were murdered — by the Egyptian pilots who repeatedly bombed and strafed them.

    Great Britain, France, the United States, all of Europe, did nothing to help the Christians. Col. Ojukwu, in his Ahiara Declaration (for the full text, google “Jihad Watch” and “Posted by Hugh” and “Ahiara Declaration”), said that the Biafrans were fighting off a “Jihad” that was being waged against them — and the word was not being used figuratively. ”

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2005/12/fitzgerald-remember-biafra

  9. linnte says

    May 22, 2016 at 4:50 pm

    Like I said, give me 11million illegal Mexicans over ONE Muslim immigrant any day. It is astounding that the prison population is a barometer for how Islamised a country has become! Will the Australian and other Western Governments help the non-Muslim population held hostage in this situation? No. Islam is the religion of peace so what better way to cause these criminals to change? How horrible!

  10. Baucent says

    May 22, 2016 at 11:00 pm

    It’s clear that Prisons are the new training camps for jihadists, and play a major role in the recruitment of new converts. The mistake is that the authorities have retreated and like a criminal gang the muslims they take over from the inside. The only way to counter the subversive threat of Islam is segregated prisons.

  11. Christian says

    May 23, 2016 at 2:48 am

    black inmates might be especially susceptible, even without any threats but through simple persuasion. not hard to imagine the muslims telling them about how Christianity is “white man’s religion”, how islam means “equality” or “peace”.
    its a disgrace; you go to jail for a few months or years, you end up being ruined forever. for he who does not have the Son, does not have the Father.
    the “secularists” who rule over the west do not give a damn…

  12. vcragain says

    May 23, 2016 at 4:43 am

    I really do not understand how prisoners are able to ‘communicate’ except by shouting thru their cell walls – are they not in cells – is the problem that most cells are multi-person ? Obviously they need to be in single cells – unable to touch each other, and never be alone with any other prisoner – how else will you stop any ‘baddie’ from becoming the top dog in any 2-person encounter?. It sounds as tho there is just too much prisoner-level social mixing. We need to make sure we ONLY send people to jail when their crimes warrant it – they have created the huge population we have with the stupid drug penalties. Once people are inmates their social lives should not be a priority, safety of other inmates & staff is #1, and we obviously need to prioritize mental safety FROM Muslims – it seems the problems of this cult of Islam are now getting everywhere and nobody wants to admit there IS a problem !!!

  13. Mubarak says

    May 23, 2016 at 5:18 am

    Islam is invented by resentment and envy. It’s true nature is triumphant in imposition.
    Islam is the ultimate catalyst for the promotion of man as “flesh”, the terse and incisive expression of the apostle Paul.

  14. WorkingClassPost says

    May 23, 2016 at 7:49 am

    If we can’t send felons back to islamic states because they may be persecuted, there must be a human rights defence against incarcerating Christian offenders in with muslims.

    Again, it’s our own legal practitioners that are afraid to stand up for us.

    I have spoken to several legal people here in the UK about the shariaization of our system, and their nonchalant indifference is astounding.

    It’s as if they are civil servants who see it as no more than a change of government that might follow a general election.

    This should not be such a surprise, because they are trained, not to seek justice, but to uphold the law, which law though, does not appear to bother them.

  15. Dacritic says

    May 23, 2016 at 12:25 pm

    What do we expect. Muhammad was the greatest gangster who ever lived.

  16. dumbledoresarmy says

    May 25, 2016 at 9:17 am

    Perhaps this article should be circulated to every *non-Islamic* prison chaplain. Most would be Christians, of various stripes; there would be a few Jewish, Hindu and Buddhist chaplains also.

    If you know such persons, send them a copy of Hugh’s article.

    They need to know what might well be happening to the members of their flock, if said flock (prisoners who have chosen to identify themselves as members of this or that non-Islamic faith) is in a prison where there is a significant number of Muslims.

    Men like the guy in the article Hugh quoted – a non-Muslim criminal who was being bullied mercilessly by the Muslims to force him to convert to Islam, but who had, up to the time of publishing of that article, somehow mustered the strength to say no despite everything he was enduring – *need* advocates. Imagine if that bloke was able to have contact with a Christian chaplain who – besides giving him spiritual comfort – would ‘fight his corner’ for him with the prison authorities, and *demand* that he be protected.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.