• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hugh Fitzgerald: Who is the Host, and Who the Guest?

May 1, 2016 12:01 am By Hugh Fitzgerald

Adel Smith

#1. FRANCE

In France, the Muslim owner of a Bordeaux grocery store has just been given a fine and a two-month jail sentence for having posted a notice on his shop window assigning different shopping days for men and women. How terrible it would be, many devout Muslims apparently feel, if a man and a woman, not married to each other, were to be alone together, even in a store. The grocery owner’s act was perfectly understandable in Muslim terms. And perfectly unacceptable in Western, French, laic terms. For now, the right side has won.

Should we feel satisfied with this outcome? A sense of relief? Are you sure that that is the end of the matter? Perhaps not, because even for this issue to have been raised, even for a Muslim to feel emboldened enough to ignore the settled laws of laic France, is worrisome in itself. But most disturbing of all in this affair is that the Muslim grocery store owner and his wife are both converts to Islam. What was it they knew, or thought they knew, about Islam when they converted? What led Jean-Baptiste Michalon to become Yahya Michalon, and his wife Jessica to transform herself into submissive Soumaya? What made them feel that in order to follow this new faith they had to subvert the most mundane rules ordering everyday life, even including food shopping?

Whatever it is that attracts the lost souls of the Western world to Islam – and we all know there is profound anomie and despair in a West that has lost its way – it is important that those who, in the political and media elites, make claim to instruct and protect us not be afraid to do what they can to openly discuss what the texts and teachings of Islam contain, undeterred by the ever-ready preposterous charge of “Islamophobia.” Adopting an attitude of laissez-faire may be tempting (e.g.,“What people believe is their own business”) to Western liberals, but given the threat of demographic conquest, it won’t do. Preventive measures need to be taken against adult-onset Islam. What other immigrant group in France has tried to ignore French laws and impose its own view of how daily life, in ways little and big, is to be regulated? Every such challenge chips away, slowly, at a country’s self-assurance, as what before the Muslim invasion had been settled law, and which the French had the right to assume could be taken for granted, has to be re-litigated. Think of the money and time spent by the French state in defending from attack the simple proposition that men and women should be allowed to buy their milk and baguettes at the same grocery store, and on the same day.

#2. ITALY

In Italy, more than a decade ago, a Muslim, Adel Smith, founder of the Union of the Muslims of Italy, sued to have the crucifix removed from his children’s school. The crucifix in Italy is not only a religious but a cultural symbol; forcing its removal, as Italian Labor Minister Maroni said at the time, “is outrageous. It is unacceptable that one judge should cancel out millennia of history.” But the Muslim petitioner, who referred to the crucifix dismissively as “a small body on two wooden sticks” won his case. Not content with that victory, Adel Smith—and other Muslims — wanted more.

He wanted verses from the Qur’an displayed in schools. He, and other Muslims, wanted to protect Muslim sensibilities by having the Catholic Church demolish an “offensive” 15th century fresco by Giovanni da Modena in the San Petronio Cathedral in Bologna. (Muslims connected to Al Qaeda have plotted to blow up the fresco, so for other Muslims to demand its nonviolent removal may in this demented world be considered a victory). He claimed that the fresco showed Muhammad – his prophet Muhammad – cast into hell. Fortunately the Church stood firm, and the fresco remains; unfortunately, the fresco, in a dark side-altar, can now be viewed only from a distance, and behind a grate, for you can no longer enter the side-altar space, so that it is impossible to see it clearly. In a sense, the Muslims have won; the hated fresco is no longer really visible. Part of Italy’s art heritage can no longer be seen and admired because it has to be protected from Muslims.

And some Italian Muslims had yet another demand: that Dante’s Divine Comedy be banned from Italian schools because Dante puts Muhammad in Hell (Inferno, Canto 28). Dante regarded Islam as a heretical offshoot of Christianity and Muhammad as a sower of discord; thus Dante depicts him as tearing himself apart, with his entrails hanging out. Dante is Italy’s national poet, central to its cultural identity, as much as Shakespeare is to England. That this attempt to force Italians to submit to the dictates of Muslims, and ban Dante from the schools, is even dared, horrifies. It would be as if Muslims in England demanded the removal of Shakespeare from the schools because of the anti-Islamic aspect of Othello: Othello, a Christianized Moor, in the employ of Christian Venice against the Muslim Ottomans, describes how he handled a “malignant and a turbaned Turk”: “I took by the throat the circumcised dog/And smote him – thus.” Come to think of it, that Muslim demand to censor Shakespeare may be coming down the pike any day now; it might just wake some of the somnambulists in the British government.

Adel Smith – his father was Scots, his mother Egyptian – converted to Islam when he moved to Italy, and like many who succumb to adult-onset Islam, was more extreme and aggressive in promoting his faith (he died in 2014 while imprisoned for fraud and forgery) even than many of those born into it. But he was not alone in making these demands. It’s a fantastic situation, when in Italy three quintessential expressions of its faith (the crucifix), its art (the Bologna fresco), and its literature (Dante) could be threatened with removal, or destruction, or banishment, if Adel Smith and his fellows had had their Muslim way.

#3. GREAT BRITAIN

In the city of Bristol, England, the city council recently refused to observe St. George’s Day. St. George, many know, is the patron saint of England; the feast day dedicated to him has been observed since 1222. But something has apparently changed. Local officials claim that the city is now “too multicultural” to recognize someone who for nearly 800 years has symbolized the Englishness of England.

Even more preposterous is the objection raised by city council members in Bristol, who said that “91 different languages are spoken in the town and it would be ‘difficult to commemorate them all.’” How do you “commemorate” a language? And why can’t people who may not be native speakers of English nonetheless want to participate in the ceremonies of the very country they have been fortunate enough to be allowed to settle in, and that has generously welcomed them? Shouldn’t such an observance be viewed as part of the acclimation and assimilation process, much like those “I Am An American Day” mass gatherings during World War II, where new immigrants had a chance to pledge their loyalty and hear speeches about what Being An American Means. This business about “91 languages” was raised to deflect attention from the real source of opposition to St. George’s Day, consisting of those Muslims who do not want to assimilate into, but want rather to transform, the non-Muslim countries that have (so generously, so foolishly) let them in.

“Some in the area” feel that the English symbol “has been hijacked by far right groups and are concerned about being branded “racist.” This reveals how successful the Muslim campaign has been, both in labeling those concerned about Islam as “far right groups” and in frightening non-Muslim officials who, out of fear of “being branded ‘racist,’” submit to Muslim desires and demands.

One local man noted that “Bristol city council refused to acknowledge St George’s day for fear of upsetting other faiths. They don’t mind upsetting us.” “Fear of upsetting other faiths”? So it wasn’t about being “too multicultural” nor about those “91 languages” after all? Which faiths, exactly, might be upset? Do you think Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists would have any problem with St. George’s Day? Everyone in Bristol knows perfectly well what faith is being proleptically placated. So from now on, you can keep trying to put things shipshape all you want, but after this triumph of the will of the local boys with the beards, please don’t do it in Bristol fashion.

CODA:

Oriana Fallaci said in a 2003 interview with the New York Observer, “[Islam] is not even a religion, in my opinion. It is a tyranny, a dictatorship — the only religion on earth that has never committed a work of self-criticism….It becomes worse and worse…and now they want to come impose it on me, on us.”

Don’t you miss Oriana?

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Eurabia, Featured, Hugh Fitzgerald Tagged With: Adel Smith, Oriana Fallaci


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Trico says

    May 1, 2016 at 12:25 am

    “different shopping days for men and women. ”
    What days can Transsexuals shop?
    What about Gender Fluid people?
    And no, I am NOT asking for myself. 🙂

    • Jay Boo says

      May 1, 2016 at 12:43 am

      Wrong article Trico
      different shopping days is the other article.

      This is about France, Italy and Britain making special accommodations to remove all traces of (Christianity) to appease Muslims and their filthy supremacist ideology.

      • Trico says

        May 1, 2016 at 1:13 pm

        thanks for the heads up. I clicked Reply in my email. I don’t know what went wrong.

    • Susan B says

      May 1, 2016 at 2:41 am

      Very funny can’t stop laughing. LOL

    • Merdilli says

      May 1, 2016 at 7:17 am

      The shop must have a door for “others” separate from men and women, this door must lead to the top of the highest building in town…

    • DFD says

      May 1, 2016 at 11:37 am

      Trico says: ““different shopping days for men and women…What days can Transsexuals shop?…What about Gender Fluid people?…”

      And the Borg, don’t forget the Borg! And the Klingons, and the….

      • Trico says

        May 1, 2016 at 1:32 pm

        What about Metrosexuals? Do we still have those or have they morphed into something else?

        • DFD says

          May 1, 2016 at 2:18 pm

          No idea, sounds like something from the Paris underground.

          Could of course be a new species, the pace of evolution…

      • Kepha says

        May 1, 2016 at 2:21 pm

        They can go whine to the courts over discrimination.

  2. linnte says

    May 1, 2016 at 12:27 am

    I miss Oriana!

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      May 1, 2016 at 10:15 am

      God showed mercy by taking her before she could be put through a show trial and then put into the slammer for her free speech. May she rest in peace.

  3. mortimer says

    May 1, 2016 at 12:29 am

    The topic in this post is the creeping Sharia demands of SUPREMACISTS.

    Muslims don’t wish equality, because there is no equality in Islam which means submission of one to another.

    Mohammedans want all dirty kafirs to submit to discriminatory rule of Muslims under draconian Sharia law.

    No way. Muslim supremacists will have to be expelled from Western countries or they will all lose their freedoms and human rights.

    • Trico says

      May 1, 2016 at 12:34 am

      “,,,hey will all lose their freedoms and human rights.”

      Actually, most of the men would be killed, the women taken as sex slaves, the children taken and indoctrinated into Islam.

      • Jay Boo says

        May 1, 2016 at 1:03 am

        Misery loves company.
        Muslims have (a Duty) to be miserable.
        Rather than escape their Islamic hell holes, Muslims wish others to endure in their daily misery and bitter emptiness that comes from followers of an ideology that is so vacuous and jealously insecure that it actually promises 72 virgins and threatens to kill anyone who leaves it.
        All Muslims are miserable.

        • DFD says

          May 1, 2016 at 7:04 am

          Hi Jay Boo, and all,

          I keep on reading about hose mysterious ’72 virgins’. Obviously I lack some knowledge here and therewith understanding about Islam, so:

          Can anybody tell me please

          A) What is a ‘virgin’
          B) Why are they so desirable

        • Shalom says

          May 1, 2016 at 9:45 am

          I was watching a t.v. programme called The Big Questions this morning on BBC and one of the subjects being discussed was Humour- Does Religion need more laughs.
          There was a female Muslim comedian and she said she has to hide the fact from her community.
          Says it all doesn’t it.

        • DFD says

          May 1, 2016 at 10:46 am

          Shalom says: “…There was a female Muslim comedian and she said she has to hide the fact from her community…”

          Which fact? That she is female or that she is making ‘fun of things’?

    • Jay Boo says

      May 1, 2016 at 12:53 am

      Very good reminder Mortimer
      “The topic in this post is the creeping Sharia demands of SUPREMACISTS. ”
      ———————————————-

      Almost correct
      You left off the specifics in relation to appeasement of Muslims by those who would willingly deny the cultural significance to Christianity.

      And while I am at it, I might mention that those who willingly aid and abet such appeasement to Muslims are not just the interfaith Chris – Lam idiots but a large number of (Atheist in name only) Christianity hating Muslim appeasers.

      • Jay Boo says

        May 1, 2016 at 1:04 am

        the cultural significance (of) Christianity.

    • linnte says

      May 3, 2016 at 9:45 am

      Wow. How did I not “hear” this before? Muslims don’t want equality because…..It’s a concept that just now hit home Mortimer. If they were raised in Islam they really don’t know what equality is. Wow. Even Western Muslims would not have a clear idea of equality.

  4. Saleem Smith says

    May 1, 2016 at 12:36 am

    No worries France and the rest of the Western world!

    Soon the entire Muslim Ummah will disregard what the majority of Muslims’ consider to be the immutable words of God they find located in the Quran and Muhammad’s Sunnah and the horrors of Mohammedan misogyny and law will cease to exist!!! Or maybe not…

    We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Islamic theology is a horrible lie that one cannot easily leave.

    >>>>>

    Should Women Respect Muhammad and His Islam?

    Muslims love to claim that Islam has granted women equal rights. Sadly, this is not true. The Qur’an states several times that women are to be granted less rights then those enjoyed by men.

    This article will examine the status of women and their rights according to Islam, as well as some of the many disgusting things that Muhammad said regarding women.

    The inherent oppression and degradation of women in Islam is abhorrent. For every good thing Muhammad’s Islam says about women, one can easily find a passage referring to women in the most unkindly of lights. Such is the reality of the fundamentally contradictory religion of Islam. One minute Islam is the perfect religion of peace and justice – the next it commands Muslims to maim, murder and subjugate others. Muslim women should learn the truth about Islam, and fast, if they truly care about their daughters and the future of women in general.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    In controversial verse 4:34 of the Qur’an, men are told to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This horrendous verse approves of and even sanctions, domestic abuse. As we shall see momentarily, Islamic theology also permits slavery and rape. No person of sound mind and good heart could believe that this is the wish of god. Islam is nothing more than the cult of a long dead, selfish little mad man named Muhammad ibn Abdullah.

    Qur’an, 4:34

    Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.

    Here is an examination of how other translators render this controversial passage:

    Pickthall: “and scourge them”
    Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
    Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
    Shakir: “and beat them”
    Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
    Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
    Arberry: “and beat them”
    Rodwell: “and scourge them”
    Sale: “and chastise them”
    Asad: “then beat them”

    Hadith, Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Number 2142:

    Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.

    The Qur’an compares women to a field (tilth) that a man is free to use when, and as he chooses:

    002.223
    Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; but do some good act for your souls beforehand; and fear Allah. And know that ye are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give (these) good tidings to those who believe.

    According to Muhammad and his Islam, a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s:

    Quran: 002:282 “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her”

    The Quran permits men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls if they want to do so:

    004:003 “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice”

    Mohammed the prophet of Islam said that women are deficient in intelligence, deficient in religion, and the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire:

    Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 1, Book 6, No. 301:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.”

    The Qur’an allows men to marry pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated.

    065.004
    YUSUFALI: Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.

    PICKTHAL: And for such of your women as despair of menstruation, if ye doubt, their period (of waiting) shall be three months, along with those who have it not. And for those with child, their period shall be till they bring forth their burden. And whosoever keepeth his duty to Allah, He maketh his course easy for him.

    SHAKIR: And (as for) those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, if you have a doubt, their prescribed time shall be three months, and of those too who have not had their courses; and (as for) the pregnant women, their prescribed time is that they lay down their burden; and whoever is careful of (his duty to) Allah He will make easy for him his affair.

    Muhammad was apparently a deranged con man who has betrayed women. Muhammad has betrayed all of mankind, in fact. Here is some more of what Muhammad said and did:

    Hadith, Sahil Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460:

    Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”

    Hadith, Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371:

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

    “By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle.” — Ibn Majah 1854

    • Mark Swan says

      May 1, 2016 at 6:57 am

      Saleem Smith…That is a good Heads-Up, for anyone thinking they can just placate Islam.

      I am happy for You that You managed to shake it off…I wish You all the best.

    • DFD says

      May 1, 2016 at 10:50 am

      Saleem Smith says: “….Should Women Respect Muhammad and His Islam?…”

      Only brainless ones

  5. TH says

    May 1, 2016 at 4:09 am

    I lived for 7 years in Italy and realized that almost any Italian kid can recite many verses of the Divine Commedy. In Italy Dante is IL POETA, THE POET, even more so than Shakespeare in England. What needs to be done is to make Europe inhospitable for muslims. Curcifixes everywhere, investigation of mosques declaring most of them illegal for promoting terrorism, delcare the Qur’an a book which promotes terroristm. Make financing of mosques by foreign States, illegal. Apply the law exactly to the muslims and deport all of the illegal ones. Offer money to those who are citizens to leave. Make them feel that they are in the wrong place. Of course, get rid of the no gones, even if it is necessary to send in the army with tanks and armored cars. Make sure no musllims get jobs in sensitive areas etc. The present crop of traitors who rule the European countries are hell bent on destroying their countried. If the likes of this is not done, there will be urban warfare like there was in Northern Ireland and more likely like Lebanon in the 70s and 80s.

    • Fessitude says

      May 1, 2016 at 4:52 pm

      Treating a resident population like that in ways tantamount to treating them like a hostile entity under a police state — a population allowed inside that Western society whom that Western society is otherwise continuing to abide in their society — seems no less of a violation of “constitutionality” and Western laws than rounding them all up and deporting them. So why not do the latter, which will minimize the problem considerably more?

      • Angemon says

        May 1, 2016 at 9:49 pm

        Fessitude posted:

        “Treating a resident population like that in ways tantamount to treating them like a hostile entity under a police state — a population allowed inside that Western society whom that Western society is otherwise continuing to abide in their society — seems no less of a violation of “constitutionality” and Western laws than rounding them all up and deporting them. ”

        This coming from the person who tried to justify a police state and never explained how “total deportation” was constitutional…

  6. Bob says

    May 1, 2016 at 5:26 am

    Lipstick on a pig. A totalitarian ideology dressed as a “religion” is still a totalitarian ideology.

  7. Vivarto says

    May 1, 2016 at 6:11 am

    It’s all good, but I think that anyone should have the right to run his store in any way he chooses.
    I am OK with Muslims making a store open for men some days, women some other days.
    I am also OK with stores putting a sign NO MUSLIMS AND DOGS ALLOWED INSIDE.
    I am even OK with stores not allowing Jews, Blacks, Whites, anyone. It is their damn store, why should they not be allowed to run it whichever way they want?
    Don’t like it? Go to another store.

    • linnte says

      May 1, 2016 at 7:02 am

      Viva, there is truth in what you say, yet something wrong also. Your idea is kind of like freedom of speech, which means people have to put up with whatever someone else says and not get violent about their words. The store problem though, is different. What if that’s the only store around close, causing me to have to drive forty miles to the one that will let me in? Aren’t we all supposed to get along? Live in peace together, be tolerant of our differences? Islam doesn’t tolerate differences, which is why they put the signs up. Here in the USA, we had a circumstance where some gay people went to a bakery to order a wedding cake and the store refused them service because they were gay. In that case, I say just go to another cake store. But what if it’s the only cake store in a hundred miles? I am not sure how I would have handled that situation. Who would be mean enough to refuse to make a wedding cake for anyone? Stuff to think about eh?

      • DFD says

        May 1, 2016 at 11:03 am

        Hi Linnte,

        Not here in the UK. Since 2014 there’s a case running against a Christian couple owning and operating a bakery. They refused to bake a wedding cake for two homosexuals, resulting in court action. Apparently it still continues, and continues to frequently making headlines. They are being assisted by the Christian Institute and its affiliated Christian Solicitors (Lawyers in US-speak), otherwise they’d gone bankrupt. See:

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12138075/Gay-marriage-cake-appeal-by-Christian-bakery-is-halted.html

        Hard to believe, but true.

        • Fessitude says

          May 1, 2016 at 5:08 pm

          “I believe the police should consider the store owner mentioned in the article as a VIP – Very Interesting Person. Because if he believes and cares enough to try to segregate between men and women, I believe that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Investigate him.”

          Good thing there’s no such thing as a cultural inculcation of deception in Islamic culture in order to pursue a stealthy war against us that (being stealthy) appears on the surface to be innocent and unsuspicious (including such behaviors as, oh, not segregating males and females, not wearing Islamic garb, not growing a big beard, etc.). Hang on, let me crank this rusty Sarc faucet off… CRONK! There!

        • Angemon says

          May 1, 2016 at 9:53 pm

          Fessitude posted:

          “Good thing there’s no such thing as a cultural inculcation of deception in Islamic culture in order to pursue a stealthy war against us that (being stealthy) appears on the surface to be innocent and unsuspicious (including such behaviors as, oh, not segregating males and females, not wearing Islamic garb, not growing a big beard, etc.). Hang on, let me crank this rusty Sarc faucet off… CRONK! There!”

          While that does not detract anything from what I said, it reminds me of something. I’ve asked you, several times: how exactly, under your “total deportation” scenario, do you propose to identify who’s a muslim? You know, seeing how they can “pursue a stealthy war against us that (being stealthy) appears on the surface to be innocent and unsuspicious (including such behaviors as, oh, not segregating males and females, not wearing Islamic garb, not growing a big beard, etc.“…

        • Angemon says

          May 2, 2016 at 6:47 am

          For the record, voeg, do you agree with that or not? Should the police be investigating this store owner, his family, friends an fellow mosque-goers, as well as what’s being taught there? Yes or no?

    • Angemon says

      May 1, 2016 at 7:22 am

      I agree, Vivarto. As far as PRIVATE businesses are concerned, they should be allowed to refuse service to whoever they want. If a store owner only wants to hire dwarf African albinos that’s his business. If a store owner wants to admit men one day and women the next, that’s his business as well. I, for one, wouldn’t spend a cent on his store. And if most people did that, he’d soon have to change his admittance policy or go out of business.

      With that said, I believe the police should consider the store owner mentioned in the article as a VIP – Very Interesting Person. Because if he believes and cares enough to try to segregate between men and women, I believe that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Investigate him. Investigate his family and friends. Investigate the mosque he goes to.

  8. jewdog says

    May 1, 2016 at 7:24 am

    Nobody forced the Eurofools to let in all those Muslims, or to give in to the demands of Muslims when it comes to questions of cultural identity. Tolerance should not mean weakness and surrender.

    • Bob says

      May 1, 2016 at 9:15 am

      What a meaningful example of hindsight!!

    • DFD says

      May 1, 2016 at 11:22 am

      To Jewdog:

      You re so right about those USA-fools letting them into the US, nobody forced them.

      Errrrr —- I think I have to read your post again, may be I am getting something wrong.

      BTW, here’s something in Hebrew, with English subtitles about letting Muslim migrants into the country of – Israel! The poor Jewish chap who sings the refugee song, (that’s the actual title: “The Singing Refugee”) hopes to become a refugee himself, and to escape from Muslim southern to northern Tel Aviv.. Two minutes of lead in, then the song.

      https://youtu.be/SiaH2MVaE7M

      Well, if anything, that will tell you something about Israel. Oh, and that’s from 2011…..

  9. duh_swami says

    May 1, 2016 at 9:39 am

    If Islam is so great, why are so many Mahoundians running away from Islamic countries?

    • DFD says

      May 1, 2016 at 11:28 am

      Because of their humble, non-complaining and undemanding spirits. So they look for some non-Islamic hell holes to settle in. Then they feel sorry for us and want us to lead into the same greatness they have escaped….

      Sorry, hang on, I’ll wake up in a moment.

    • Trico says

      May 1, 2016 at 1:26 pm

      “why are so many Mahoundians running away from Islamic countries?”
      “Infidels. We wrecked our country, now we’re coming to wreck yours, Allah willing. Alahu Akbar”.

    • Fessitude says

      May 1, 2016 at 5:12 pm

      They’re not running from Muslim countries — they’re running towards and into our countries, in order to pave the way, through a strategy of multifarious jihad (some of the forms of jihad under the radar of the Western Mainstream (and even of some in the Counter-Jihad) who are only on the lookout for Muslims with a ticking bomb like something out of a Road Runner cartoon).

  10. citycat says

    May 1, 2016 at 10:19 am

    A convert has been more suckered than one who’s a Muslim from birth, and i’ve noticed that voluntary converts are more devout and rigid in following the rules of the religion, and will volunteer engagement with infidels to try to convert, whereas a human born into Islaam probably won’t mention Islaam at all in everyday interaction, as all he has to do is breed. Converts try to prove themselves to their peers, and may be attracted to the narcissistic quality of Islaam.
    91 languages but not 91 religions.
    Take away only one of those religions, ykw, and all will be much better.

  11. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    May 1, 2016 at 10:23 am

    If it were so good that the only way for Infidels to succumb to Islam was by the sword, then we could take a stand and fight. And win. But things aren’t so rosy. Looking at the examples set forth by Fitzgerald here, all of them previously reported, we see the pattern in which it doesn’t matter whether takeover is done by voluntary conversion or by political intimidation, they are just two different ways of giving up.

    But never forget that both modes of defeat are always driven by, given their power and impetus, by the threat of personal ruination, injury or murder. This is the engine that impels Islam: Jihad. By no mistake the name of this blog is watching Jihad. Look out!

    Reading this essay I thought that Oriana Fallaci wouldn’t roll in her grave. She’d just give a perfunctory nod of her head, as if these things were inevitable all along, so obvious. What is to come is just as inevitable. We need a change, a curve ball or a change up, a delivery to stop the pattern of where the bad guys, the fat slow unhappy DHs who can’t field are always hitting dingers against us.

    • Fessitude says

      May 1, 2016 at 5:23 pm

      Muslims won’t be able to take over the West without massive and rampant acts of violence. Anyone who thinks otherwise, apparently hasn’t thought through how radically, monstrously different the Muslim society is from Western society (we’re talking the true Muslim society, not the traveling Potemkin Circus the pseudo-Reformer Muslims try to sell the West). Only a tiny fraction of Westerners are so far gone they would actually prefer, or allow, such a takeover without being violently compelled to submit.

      What’s going on with “Sharia Creep” that Hugh and others document is an artificial phenomenon, generated by the stealth jihad that has to operate that way because Muslims aren’t capable of just taking over with might. The transition from the elaborate subterfuge and deception going on in this phase to a “takeover” logically can’t happen by more of the same — more subterfuge and deception — because that is not the real Sharia nor is it the real Islam. And the reason why, obviously, is because Westerners wouldn’t put up with hand-chopping for theft, head-chopping for witchcraft, stoning adulterers, and flogging for casual sex acts (let alone for mere mingling of men and women in public), and hanging gays from cranes — so Muslims have to sell the idea of a “Sharia Lite” (which is a taqiyya fiction) in order to get a toe-wedge in for the beginning of Sharia Creep.

      But again, there is no smooth, gradual transition from the Sharia Lite to head-chopping. At a certain point, the vast majjority of Westerners — including even the dunderheaded PC MCs — will be forced awake, and at that point Muslims will have to pull off the mask and draw out the sword to attack us. They can’t do that yet, because they have more infiltrating to do. And the West continues to enable that continued infiltration (and many in the Counter-Jihad do their part in this Useful Idiocy, by refusing to push the meme of rational prejudice against all Muslims).

  12. duh_swami says

    May 1, 2016 at 10:57 am

    If you are holding a cross that big when Drac’ullah appearsup, don’t just show it to him, hit him with it…

  13. Reni Jollant says

    May 1, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    Muslim men seem unable to control themselves when they see women or children. They just rape women and children whenever they see them. They have to be prevented from any association with women and with children.

    • Trico says

      May 1, 2016 at 12:56 pm

      “Muslim men seem unable to control themselves when they see women or children.” That’s why everyone has to wear a beekeeper’s outfit. Hide the Evil Flesh.

    • Trico says

      May 1, 2016 at 1:03 pm

      “Muslim men seem unable to control themselves when they see women or children. ” They rape men too. Save those wine corks.

      • ploome says

        May 1, 2016 at 1:49 pm

        Muslim men are taught that whatever arouses them is guilty of fitna.. creating c

        and they are not responsible for the rape..or whatever

    • Custos Custodum says

      May 1, 2016 at 4:57 pm

      Muslim men are quite able to control their urges, provided that ISLAMIC-style penalties are in place.

      This includes murder of the offender’s family members by the clan of the injured woman.

  14. Trico says

    May 1, 2016 at 1:35 pm

    “Dante puts Muhammad in Hell”
    It was wrong of Dante to openly publish Muhammad’s (peace be upon him) home address. Privacy rights were violated.

  15. bridgette says

    May 1, 2016 at 2:37 pm

    When can I pass out bibles in Saudi Arabia?

  16. Guest says

    May 1, 2016 at 6:07 pm

    The rule of guest says so long as a guest does no harm to you or yours, you must welcome them into your home. (Translation: if refugees misbehave we have to deport them)

  17. Mubarak says

    May 2, 2016 at 3:37 am

    Could this act of a Muslim owner of a Bordeaux grocery store in France be seen as an ironic response to the obliteration of sex differences and gender politics and feminism gone mad here in the West? Don’t we call for this? Is it not an appropriate reaction? Don’t we deserve it?

    • Angemon says

      May 2, 2016 at 6:47 am

      Are you mad?

    • linnte says

      May 2, 2016 at 11:17 am

      MUbarak, women and men live in harmony together in my country. I go to the store all by myself and shop where others shop, men and women together. No one offends anyone. The only offense would be if am man said to me, “you can’t shop today because it is man’s day”.

      God created men and women. How can Gods creation be any less than any other of God’s creation? Is the horse less beautiful and nessessary than a man? All of God’s creation are perfect. How can you possibly think separating men and women glorifies God?

    • gravenimage says

      May 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm

      The vile Mubarak wrote:

      Could this act of a Muslim owner of a Bordeaux grocery store in France be seen as an ironic response to the obliteration of sex differences and gender politics and feminism gone mad here in the West? Don’t we call for this? Is it not an appropriate reaction? Don’t we deserve it?
      ……………………………..

      The idea that Mohammedans–who have *always* practiced Purdah for women–are reacting to any trends in the West is simply ludicrous.

      Muslims have behaved like this everywhere they have gone.

      But this falls right in with Mubarak’s disgusting claims that Westerners deserve to be raped and murdered by his foul coreligionists due to our (supposed) shortcomings.

      This attitude is, in fact, mainstream Islam.

      • linnte says

        May 16, 2016 at 7:28 pm

        I love it when Muslims post. It always proves us right! Hahahaha!

  18. Florida Jim says

    May 2, 2016 at 9:32 am

    Islam requires all muslims to follow Sharia, Jihad and “taqiyya”, which is lying as needed to anyone Obama practices this but Iran does also in dealings with everyone look at the Iran nuclear deal and the Iran $150,000,000,000 rape of Obama , Kerry and America where we pay them to screw us for $150 billion dollars to fund terror everywhere. Obama’s legacy is a horror show.

  19. Steve says

    May 3, 2016 at 9:18 am

    https://youtu.be/6CsU3D59XC4

    • linnte says

      May 3, 2016 at 10:25 am

      I wish it had subtitles, but the gist of what he is saying comes through loud and clear. It almost makes me feel sorry for the Burqua clad woman.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.