He apologizes now. Before too long, however, all major politicians in the UK will repudiate “Uncle Tom” Muslim groups, and demand that the majority be given what it wants: Sharia.
“Sadiq Khan issues grovelling apology after video shows him using ‘Uncle Toms’ slur against moderate Muslims,” by James Tapsfield, Mailonline, May 4, 2016:
Labour’s candidate for London Mayor has issued a grovelling apology after it emerged that he had described moderate Muslim groups as ‘Uncle Toms’.
Sadiq Khan said he regretted using the term, which is notorious racial slur used against black people to suggest that they are subservient to whites.
But he also insisted he would ‘respect’ everyone in the capital if he was elected, and lashed out at tactics employed by Tory rival Zac Goldsmith during the battle.
The incendiary claim surfaced in an interview with Iranian-backed Press TV from 2009, when Mr Khan was ‘minister for community cohesion’, in charge of Government efforts to stamp out extremism.
The revelation is a major blow for Mr Khan, who has faced a string of claims about his past dealings with Muslim extremists during the bitter campaign to succeed Boris Johnson.
Mr Khan has dismissed Tory attacks as baseless ‘smears’, and insisted that he was a moderate Muslim.
The Tooting MP himself condemned the use of the Uncle Tom term in recent days while attacking former London Mayor Ken Livingstone for his offensive claim that Hitler was a Zionist.
Asked on LBC Radio at the weekend whether he considered terms such as ‘Zio and Uncle Tom’ to be racist, he replied: ‘They are racist, they should not be used. The harsh truth is this – the comments from Ken Livingstone were appalling and disgusting and should have no place in our party.’
Challenged about 2009 the comments in interviews today, Mr Khan said: ‘It is (a racial slur) and I regret using that phrase.
‘The context was me trying to encourage everyone to get involved in government consultations.’
He told ITV News London. ‘I was a minister at the time. It was wrong and I regret it.’
Speaking on LBC he said: ‘I regret using the phrase and I am sorry.
‘The point I was trying to make was that I wanted to talk to anyone.’
Mr Khan suggested he himself would have been a target for the slur, pointing out that there were protests outside his local mosque when he first stood for parliament.
He said he had been ‘disappointed’ by Mr Goldsmith’s tactics during the battle, which have included repeated claims about his links to extremists. ‘I thought he was his own man,’ Mr Khan said….
In the 2009 interview with Press TV Mr Khan was asked why the Government’s counter-extremism strategy focused on working with moderate Muslim groups like the respect Quilliam Foundation.
He responded: ‘I wish we only spoke to people who agree with us. I can tell you that I’ve spent the last months in this job speaking to all sorts of people. Not just leaders, not just organisations but ordinary rank and file citizens of Muslim faith and that’s what good government is about, it’s about engaging with all stakeholders. You can talk about articles in the newspapers about what an organisation might get but the point is you can’t just pick and choose who you speak to, you can’t just speak to Uncle Toms.’

Don McKellar says
Wow! This is a watershed moment here. Absolute insanity as his mask slips off and shows the agenda to come. What a nightmare awaits London.
Charli Main says
Dick Whittington must be spinning in his grave.
mortimer says
He promised to freeze transit fares for 4 years. A lot of people were naïve enough to believe him. He will raise tax in other ways they won’t like. They will sneak taxes in little by little.
Londoners obviously were duped to think there is a free lunch.
خَليفة says
Bet he’ll Slip in some new jizya tax … Muslims, of course will be exempt
Shane says
The UK is well on its way to being a dhimmi state to Islam, and will become an Islamic republic before the end of this century. When the infidels start fleeing the UK, we should not take in large numbers of them, as they deserve their fate.
John R Marks says
It is Cat-astrophic.
Jay Boo says
Sadiq Khan … AKA
Suh Deek —- The Sneek
Polk1970 says
How STUPID can the British voters be,or are they already CONQUERED mentally?
Surely VOTE FRAUD occurred ,or the English have completely LOST their minds.
Likely,BOTH!
Don McKellar says
It’s a combination of four things that let this moslem creep slip in:
1) Only a 45% voter turnout. Pathetic! You can be certain that every damn moslem and every damn left-fascist idiot in London voted.
2) Massive voter fraud. See point one.
3) A conquered mentality.
4) The madness of political correctness which is killing Europe.
mortimer says
One more thing I would add: there’s the ‘underdog’ angle that British people love. Zack Goldsmith is a multimillionaire and the busman’s son an irresistible catch for some people who can’t understand English. Khan is a con and will soon be seen as one…a confidence artist and trickster.
Bait and switch…normative Islamic taqiyya.
John Swallow says
They are stupid or are they now outnumbered since the fools have allowed so many of these Stone Age bastards into the U K? What ever, they had best get use to being a minority in the country they mistakenly thought was theirs.
Quinncy says
Hope electing him doesn’t bite you in the ass like what happened to USA
sam says
UK deserves Islam. A muslim mayor? What do you expect?
We have Obama here (twice) and unfortunately I will say the same thing for us.
Ralph Statum says
One would imagine that most Americans are totally confused and perplexed as to why “Shariah Law” or for that matter “any foreign law” would be “constitutionally legal”, in this or within any civil society, that have fundamental humanitarian issues with a society that engages in human rights violations.
Moreover our laws have been derived from a “Judeo/Christian” precept, and as such written within our founding documents, and cannot be altered and simply changed to suit the whim of whatever loon lurks to undermine our country without a “Constitutional Amendment.”
In short “Shariah Law” is fundamentally incompatible with American’s basic principles of individual rights, however even if this barbaric doctrine were compatible, it still would simply be “unconstitutional!”
Nevertheless individual states knowing full well of Obama’s propensity for lawlessness, have decided to “legislatively” ban any kind of Islamic Law…PERIOD!
Those states that have signed legislation are: Alabama (two bills), Arkansas, Florida (two bills), Indiana (two bills), Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi (four bills), Missouri, (two bills), North Carolina, Oklahoma (seven bills), South Carolina (two bills), Texas (six bills), Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming (two bills).
Of course front groups for radical extremism like CAIR, attempt to spin a different narrative suggesting that this type of legislation is “virulently racist” and “outright hostility towards Muslims.”
However the real danger for America is apathy, in that people need to be vigilant and hold their elected officials accountable, and a prime example of that was in Florida where a judge allowed “Muslim Law” to supersede American Law over funding of a Mosque.
HEY OBAMA FORGOT ABOUT THIS LAW……Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration!
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.
U.S. Code § 1182 – Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Mark Swan says
Ralph Statum…These laws do exist, and are ignored, because, We have had no national
conversation on this subject.
Even our constitutional law has been twisted.
We need to get on tract now.
Myxlplik says
Very sober analysis Mark, true words.
Mark Swan says
These laws do exist, and are ignored, because, We have had no national
conversation on this subject.
Even our constitutional law has been twisted.
We need to get on tract now.
mortimer says
A new political movement is born: The Immigration and Nationality Act 1952 Movement.
Trump will only need to make a presidential decree …
“… Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation…”
mortimer says
What a tangled web Muslims weave when they actually practice taqiyya. This man is a fifth columnist who considers anti-radicalization people to be disloyal Muslims who have abandoned jihad. That is the deeper meaning of his words.
Khan is a defender of jihad when speaking to Muslims, but an opponent of jihad when that’s his job in a Labour government.
If he opposes jihad, Khan is saying he has left Islam and should be executed. If Khan agrees with jihad (as a non-Uncle Tom), Khan is a fifth columnist at war with England.
So will the real Sadiq Kham please stand up? Who are you?
Mark Swan says
Islam’s political philosophy advocates the rule of nations (and eventually the whole world…through conversion or conquest) by the many centuries of Sharia law built on the foundation of the Muslim book…the Qu’ran.
This Man knows this full well, all the accolades known, won’t turn His heart away from it.
Polk1970 says
Don’t be in doubt
The REAL Kahn is an Extremist STEALTH Jihadist
That should be obvious.
Demsci says
Mortimer, after Rotterdam, a 10 times or more bigger city now has a Muslim Mayor!
Yes, your formulation of the stark choice Sadiq Khan has, I agree with. I suppose that in his own mind he is not per se against England, as he believes in a de facto “totalitarian political system” that is better for England. And of course in the past England did have a “totalitarian political system” with it’s kings.
But he definitely is either at war with Islam OR with the full democratic system. Although both Aboutaleb and he try to maintain that being Muslim AND in favor of the full Democratic system IS possible, but I don’t believe that anymore. In theory perhaps, as in resorting back to Islam’s first period in which the religion had not yet set. But the vast majority of Muslims seems not inclined, or interested to such an approach.
Bitterly comforting though is the thought that, hey, how many non-Muslim western citizens really seem to care one way or the other for the full democratic system? Only a minority I suppose, like here on Jihad Watch, and those pro-democratic citizens people like me cherish as positive exception. The rest of all those disinterested, political correct, neutral, ignorant or even downright “totalitarian” citizens are more like the NORM. No longer, it seems to me, are Muslims (in Western nations) negative deviations from this norm. It is just that they are the most determined, most dangerous group.
Jay Boo says
Isn’t he one of the characters on the British TV show the Middle EastEnders?
mortimer says
“Uncle Tom”, Khan’s definition: a Muslim who helps kafirs not to get blown up, stabbed, raped, robbed, enslaved, or persecuted.
Conclusion: Khan believes, when the jihadists come to town, ‘good’ Muslims pretend they know nothing, maintain secrecy and do nothing to alert the authorities.
Therefore, Khan is a fifth columnist.
Polk1970 says
MI-5 must stop him from taking office based on National Security
The Metropolitan Police/ Scotland Yard CANNOT be under his Office
Look for vote fraud in East London
There must be a way to nullify Khan’s election
Demsci says
Yes, but I am not at all sure about the 4 columns of society! You sketch, it seems to me, 4 good columns as the norm, and one traitorous bad column as the negative deviation, notably the Muslims.
I on the other hand would have us try to assess how much bonafide real pro-democratic people form the other 4 columns, and how many not?
I venture that perhaps “2 columns”, perhaps 40 % of all citizens, at most, are truly pro-democracy, knowledgeable about it and willing ot defend and promote it. The positive exception to a lower norm for true Loyalty to true Democracy.
That means that “3 columns”, not just one, are low-democratic, un-democratic or anti-democratic. Or so I interpret the constant data, with all those leftists and political correct people in our Western populations expressing their opinions or showing lack thereof or lack of interest therein.
mortimer says
Londoners were tricked.
Angemon says
Really, what else needs saying? When he was in charge of “community cohesion” and “stamping out extremism” he considered “moderate” muslims to be “Uncle Toms”.
45% voter turnout – let that sink in…
Walter Sieruk says
What Sadig Khan is doing is the Muslim activity of engaging in what is called “Islamic Gradualism.” Otherwise known as “stealth jihad.” This Stealth jihad has the same end goal as the violent an deadly militant jihad. also termed as “jihad of the sword.” This same end goal is achieving much power for Islam but by a much more subtle ,sly and insidious way then militant jihad. The stealth jihad for the advancement of power for Islam is also performed in many other Western nations. This method of jihad had many Muslim who engage in it speak disingenuous and outright lying words to Westerners in the hope of deceiving them for their Islamic agenda. So that Muslim mayor calling moderate [or non-jihad minded] Muslims “Uncle Toms” was letting his real feeling and intentions slip out. Furthermore, this subtle scheme of a strategy of stealth jihad implements the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya. Which if the Islamic teaching that deception and lying are good things to do we long as such things are done for the good of Islam. An strange observation is that,in some ways, this technique stealth jihad is similar to the teaching of Sun Tzu in THE ART OF WAR. Which teaches “At first,then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening;afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to oppose you.”
Donna says
This saddens me. Clear evidence the 2nd branch of Islam is now an established presence there, even tho media denies it.
Charli Main says
The Conservative Party are guilty of ignorance and stupidity bordering on certifiable insanity.
It does not get more stupid than putting up a ” Jewish posh boy ” ( used as an expression in common usage not as a racial slur ) as a candidate for mayor in Muslim and anti- semitic, infested Londonistan.
As stupid as putting up a Jewish banker for mayor of Berlin in 1938 Germany.
Fessitude says
“Before too long, however, all major politicians in the UK will repudiate “Uncle Tom” Muslim groups…”
Yes, and meanwhile the glacially growing Counter-Jihad will continue, more and more, to turn toward the warm and oily embrace of those pseudo-reformist Muslims who, by being branded “Uncle Toms” by the likes of Bad Cops like Sadiq Khan (much less more obviously Islamic Muslims) — e.g., Maajid Nawaz, Zuhdi Jasser, Asra Nomani, Hala Arafa, Salim Mansur (whom Counter-Jihad interviewer Gad Saad in the context of anxiously assuring his audience that not all Muslims are extremists, hastens to call a “friend”), Tarek Fatah, a Muslima named Elinyah (who wrote an open letter upbraiding Ben Affleck), Hamel Abdel-Samad, Muslim professor Reza Varjavand; et al. (qaeda)… The list, unfortunately, seems endless.
Indeed, that seems to be one effective function of this “Uncle Tom” branding – aimed not at the Western Mainstream, but specifically targeting the Counter-Jihad Mainstream, manipulating them in their anxious search for the Good Muslim to feel more warmly disposed to the wiles of the wilier “Better Cops” like those in my list above.
Angemon says
Fessitude posted:
“…Counter-Jihad interviewer Gad Saad…”
Hi Fessitude.
You said you called Gad Saad “the Jewish Cenk Uygur”. Does that mean Cenk Uygur is a Counter-Jihad interviewer?
Thanks.
Demsci says
I see what you mean, and Westerners should not believe in their version of Islam, I agree.
But the great Prof. Mordechai Kedar in Israel National News, really wrote that: “Islam as a smorgasbrod-buffet” for all to take from it what they want and what they are prejudiced too.
This is not necessarily true either, but it would be much better if Westerners took it as a lead.
For many to say: Do not believe those “moderate Muslims”, not just because the Radical Muslims practice the real Islam and say something totally contradicting them,
but more because those moderates do show that Westerners can dismiss all naive belief in the possibility of one clear Islam-that-is-beneficial;
instead they can think; We know what the radicals AND the Moderates say and what Muslims say, just is so variable, and contradicting, it just isn’t reliable, to be taken seriously, therefore we must prepare for the worst-case.
In other words, the danger is primarily in Westerners naively believing in “one-true-Islam-that-is-beneficial”, but not in “Islam is explained in very contradicted ways’-and they can’t both be true-therefore we don’t believe the reassuring version just like that.
Fessitude says
Well, that’s an interesting approach; however, I don’t think it would work as you theorize. The main problem is that PC MCs tend to use the “diversity” meme (aka “Islam is not monolithic”) as a way to give Muslims an escape hatch from the responsibility their allegiance to Islam would logically entail. So while you may be right, what’s more important, unfortunately, is how the dominant and mainstream PC MC proceeds, irrespective of our theories.
Demsci says
aint’that the truth. We are nowhere yet. Let us hope that the rise of the anti-Islam-parties on these PC MC’s works, Fessitude.
Demsci says
I mean the pressure that exerts
Myxlplik says
Well, at least the Brits haven’t elected a person who went to a Madrassa as a kid to lead their entire country like we did. It’s bad all over, ignorance = ruin.
Now we get to see how he behaves.
Angemon says
Not yet at least…
Mak says
I was disappointed for Londonistan until I read your comment; it re-enforced the notion of exactly who is running the US (into the ground): Barak Hussein. Our Muslim in Chief.
jewdog says
I can’t wait until TIME magazine runs a clever, defensive, feel-good cover story on how multiculturalism is finally becoming a reality with this, the accession of a humble, John Kasich-like Muslim as London’s mayor, despite determined opposition from the “far right” and the Zionists. Where’s my barf bag?
Mark Swan says
It Will probably happen.
Judi says
MP – Obviously the voters were the muzzrats (of which there is no shortage in London), loony left Corbyn supporters, throw in voter fraud, and there you have the answer.
Mirren10 says
Also include in the list the disinterest, apathy, and sheer mental laziness of the majority. A 45% turnout ? Says it all. My countrymen are sleepwalking to their deaths.
Angemon says
Indeed, I pointed that out on a couple of topics. 45% turnout? They got what they voted for – or at least didn’t bother to vote against.
Charli Main says
@ M10
Even more frightening, I have absolutely no doubt, that the same apathy and disinterest will be evident on the EU referendum.
Most Brits don´t care whether Britain leaves the EU or stays in. To busy watching Eastenders or blathering on facebook with their mates to find the time to vote.
Most, probably don´t even understand the REAL issues involved and think Brexit is the latest snack offering in McDonalds.
Mirren10 says
All too true, Charli.
somehistory says
He’s *moderate* and *moderates* are slurred by him…not being truly moslim, because as we all know, moslims aren’t subservient to anyone…they are forcing subservience on everyone else.
So, if he no longer deserves the *slur*…that must mean he considers himself a true moslim…and will force the population of non-moslims to become subservient to his moslim brothers.
The wild beast is said to receive its power, throne and authority from satan. satan the devil has placed one of his own on the seat of governance in London.
It will be a happy day world-wide when islam is no more.
Guest says
There are two types of Muslims. The moderate Muslims, who don’t believe non-Muslims are less than human and deserve to be raped and die, and actually believe in peace and equality and try to be friends.
The other type are the radicals, everything the moderates are, they are not.
If the new mayor insults moderates, what type of Muslim did London vote for?
Polk1970 says
You already know that answer
Khan,whose Office oversees the Metropolitan Police/Scotland Yard is a threat to British National Security
Singh the Sikh says
Muhammed’s hoy shit allah boo hoo Akbar inshallah London has a Muslim mayor! Who would have thought? Silly question. It should have been seen from a mile off. Cameron and previous governments’ immigration policies have come home to roost. Major victory for Muslims. Muslims homes throughout the world are celebrating. Muslims see it as major conquest and the sign of things to come in their quest to dominate the world by takeover of Europe through political jihad, which is tied to migration jihad, accelerated by recent migration crisis. The London victory will inspire, embolden and encourge Muslims. Reinforce their belief that nothing is impossible in Islam. One positive from this outcome is that the mayor’s mask will soon slip and Muslims who are beside themselves with glee wili not be able to contain themselves for long or hold back their true feeling and demonstrate their arrogance and gloating nature and true intentions. Hopefully there will be an awakening and backlash from the greater population. All we can do is hope.
linnte says
I think you’re right, and now also, we get to see what happens with Anjem Choudary and if the new mayor of London intervenes on the part of Anjem to get him freed. If that happens, (Choudary found not guilty) then the Muslims of London will start strutting their stuff. All hell will break loose.
Mark Swan says
Yep
Polk1970 says
Choudry and Kahn= Sharpton and DiBlasio
Polk1970 says
ONLY,MUCH WORSE
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
We’ve just crossed a bridge, and are in new territory now. The greatest city in the West, London, has been taken over by a Moslem at the request of the voters. It’s one thing for Pope Frank to laud Islam as an ROP as they slaughter and enslave Christians in the Levant, it’s another to force the blondes in Stockholm to dye their hair black to make themselves less likely to suffer rape at the hands of a Moslem who won’t be prosecuted, and another to not look at an immigrants Facebook declaration of alignment with ISIS out of respect for her privacy, or the ruling English elites to set up 84 Sharia courts… but it’s quite another for the voters themselves to elect a Moslem who makes no secret of his support for Jihad mass murder as commanded in the Holy Ko-Ran.
abad says
So, is Londonstan officially under Sharia law now with this Ishnaq?
Wellington says
An enemy of the best that England has produced and bestowed upon the world, and it is both a great production and a great bestowal, is now the mayor of its largest city. If one does not detect a myriad of ominous elements in this “development” then such a person is quite simply a fool——or even worse.
mortimer says
Agree.
Let us imagine that in the year 1938, London had elected a German mayor who said that Germans who opposed Hitler were ‘Uncle Toms’. Such a German mayor would be implying that England should not resist Hitler’s attacks but surrender to Hitler.
Presumably, the ‘Uncle Toms’ Khan mentioned are all people who want to defend Britain from deadly jihad attacks and Khan has implied that they are wrong to work with the police to stop jihad…that they are wrong to communicate jihad threats to the authorities.
It is significant that Khan, upon election, did not say he would try to stop radicalization. He said he would try to improve emergency response to a jihad attack! This is very disturbing.
He mentioned NO MEASURE to prevent jihad.
Wellington says
I regularly find that comparisons between Islam and Nazism are eminently defensible. Your comparison of such, mortimer, certainly serves as no exception to this rule.
Just to move to the “sartorial angle” alone, a woman wearing an hijab, never mind the black cloth garbage bag that many Muslimas wear, represents to me nothing better than one wearing a swastika. Yes, Muslim attire, be it those stupid skull caps worn by men, or an hijab or burqa by women, are the Islamic sartorial equivalent of the swastika. No one could ever, will ever, persuade me otherwise.
And the “Uncle Tom” comment by the new mayor of Londonistan is so revealing. It in microcosm conveys, unwittingly of course, just how futile it is to count on just about the most clueless, gutless and worthless group of people on the planet, i.e., so-called moderate Muslims. As with the Anglo-Irish in the Dublin Pale, who were too Irish for the English and too English for the Irish, so is it the case that so-called moderate Muslims have no real base, though I want to make it crystal clear that this comparison of mine is only meant to impugn moderate Muslims and certainly not the Anglo-Irish who had much in their favor, contra that “other group” I already mentioned and respecting whom I find very little to nothing in their favor.
mortimer says
A woman who wears full Islamic dress is declaring that she has submitted to her alpha male as his personal property and that she accepts her eternal role as second class.
The Islamic dress also infers that the woman accepts Islam’s odious doctrines and that she hates kafirs for the sake of Allah, and that she must maintain a distance from them, and never befriend them and accepts that jihad is the right way to ‘deal with’ kafirs. Islamic dress is the uniform of a theocratic supremacist…a theocratic fascist.
Western people misunderstand that the female Islamic dress is not primarily about modesty or piety, but is all about ownership and the kinship of ownership…a Muslim woman is promised to her first cousin before she may marry someone else (i.e. the right of first refusal).
Demsci says
I so agree with both Wellington and Mortimer. Like the Muslima’s wearing the hijab like Nazi’s a Swastika etc.
Now In Rotterdam, we see those hijabs everywhere every day. For instance, sometimes all the young females cashiers of the supermarket Albert Hein, can be all (10 or so) hijabbed women. Cheerfully and impeccably helping us customers.
The point I like to make is that persons like us almost revere “the full democratic system”. But can still see that others revere “other political systems”, however mistaken. And respect that as in “who knows, there maybe something good in totalitarianism for a part of humanity” although I don’t see it”.
While we definitely not are respecting Muslim’s tactics, like lying, censoring, intimidating and their great lack of rational, logical, reasonable arguments. And so we are not liking their moral behavior.
But all the same it seems to me that those Muslima’s know what they are FOR, and committed too, and that they are proud of that.
While the Western people around them, at first glance AND at further consideration, still, come across as in majority only knowing what they are AGAINST, as everyone knows that, but not as well as Muslims know what they are for and committed to defend and promote.
For example; what peace of cloth is it that a truly proud democratic woman could wear in positive identifyable opposition to these damned hijabs, worn by all these Muslima’s?
And some say that most committed win, and that the people who know what they are for are more successful on average than those who only know what they are against.
If this is true, it is fortunately for us, the Muslims themselves are more like a negative and confused bunch than a determined united foe.
mortimer says
Exactly…’moderate’ Muslims must go along with the jihad or be run over by it.
Khan has declared the ‘moderate’ Muslims to be sell-outs who are helping the enemies of Islam. He has implied he wishes the Islamization of England.
Mark Swan says
Yep
Demsci says
On principle I can relate to that. The other possibility is that large numbers of Muslims are at least confused, ignorant about their own religion. And don’t forget, Muslims in Democratic Nations are heavy stakeholders in the current democratic system.
Because so many Muslims are so heavily dependent on social welfare, and medical care; it is stupefying, and THAT, they may well be loath to give up. Examples; when marriages between Muslims from different countres take place, invariably their choice of residence is the Democratic country, not the Islamic one.
And; I have directly and indirectly heard that Muslims even import their ailing parents to Democratic Nations to prophit from the much better, much less corrupt health care system here. Even without imports, the number of ailing elderly Muslims, dependent on “Infidel health care” is huge and their childeren are very loyal on average. And look at all those children for whom Muslims are heavily dependent on education, health care, safety, money, food, holidays even.
So many Muslims are very much stakeholders in the current democratic system, their goose with the golden eggs, and though it costs us dearly, it may explain why most Muslims “stay their hand” and refrain from Jihad.
mike ryan says
Labour is becoming Ingsoc. It is getting harder and harder to respect the run-of-the-mill Britain who passively turns over the house keys to the Sons of Yishmael.
Mirren10 says
”It is getting harder and harder to respect the run-of-the-mill Britain who passively turns over the house keys to the Sons of Yishmael.”
Yes. I hate to say it, but I agree.
Fessitude says
Rare to see a JIhad Watcher direct his critical eye at ordinary people, rather than the Dastardly Elites with twirling moustaches in smoke-filled rooms.
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
Mister Khan is droppin taqqiya like it’s hot!
linnte says
I sit back amazed at the incredibly smart people who are writing here. You guys are awesome. What a great conversation!
Mark Swan says
You’re not too shaby Yourself when the mood hits You linnte .
SHANE BRANDON says
THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE NOW BUT CIVIL WAR IN BRITAIN//EUROPE AND THE REST OF THE WORLD.
THIS WILL BE THE STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL.SHARIA WITH ALL IT’S EVIL,OR CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY THAT WAS FOUGHT FOR AND WON IN 1914–1918 1939–1945.
ONCE AND FOR ALL ISLAM HAS TO BE BURIED. LONDON’s APPEASERS HAVE MADE THIS QUITE CLEAR.
Lizzy says
Elections in the UK are given a hand to the benefit of islamics from the town of Mirpur, Pakistan. The link below was published in 2010 and there is no indication it doesn’t still apply.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8655697.stm
Mirren10 says
From the link Lizzy posted:
”Sitting in the garden of a large villa in Mirpur, a British citizen who has been a taxi driver in Halifax in Yorkshire for more than 20 years, talks of a practice which has become widespread here.
For obvious reasons the man, in his fifties, does not want us to publish his name. He describes how people are going door to door asking Britons to blindly sign proxy forms for the upcoming elections, allowing someone else in the UK to vote on their behalf.
“They said I didn’t have to fill in any details, just to sign my name at the bottom of the form,” he says, smiling. “So I signed two.”
He laughed as he told me he had no idea who was going to vote on his behalf, and whom they were going to vote for.
“I personally know 25 other people who did the same thing, lots of people just on this street, but everybody does it.”
Dear God. We are so fucked.
The Vilest of Creatures says
The whole of Londonstan will be a No-Go Zone now.
Michael Copeland says
The leopard cannot change his spots.
Dave says
This Islamic thug was voted in by-the-people – this is the law of sowing and reaping.
denis says
London is so full of Muslims that Khan won on the Islamic vote alone. No true Londoner would vote for a an Islamic mayor who will bring his hard Islamic thinking and biases to council. He will give Muslims favourite people status and with it will come the uber promotion of Islamophobia which he helped to coin.
London is in Muslim trouble and so is all of England with this Islamic cult.
RICHTHOFEN says
Wake up, sheeple!
Loudiman says
We are the sheeple we were the Europe!
Christiana Coltrane says
The Queen is the defender of ”The Faith” so we should all write to her and tell her we don’t want ‘illegal’ sharia law in the UK.
Osama bin Laden paid Bosnian women 300 D Marks per month to wear headscarves, around the time he was telling muslims in the Balkans to kill Christian Serbs. He was helped by Bill Clinton who bombed Serbia to bits. They’d done nothing wrong, just defended themselves.
The migrants are coming here to kill us and was planned by Obama, Merkel and all the other commies.
We have to stand up to them. At least in America they have guns for self-defence, tho’ Barry is doing his best to get them back before declaring martial law.
Pick up your pens and write to Buckingham Palace – that will be a start – remember the Queen got rid of Abu Hamza.