“Muslim woman’s cheeky selfie with anti-Islam group goes viral,” crowed the BBC. “Muslim Woman Takes ‘Peace Selfie’ In Front Of Anti-Muslim Protesters,” chirped the Huffington Post. “This young Muslim woman brilliantly countered an anti-Muslim protest — with selfies,” Vox exulted. “Defiant teen stands up to anti-Muslim protesters with amazing selfies,” cheered the Telegraph.
Just one catch, fellows.
“Media-Darling Muslim Selfie Girl: ‘Hitler Left Some Jews So We’d Know Why He Killed Them,’” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, May 21, 2016:
A Muslim girl who took a “defiant” selfie at an anti-Islam protest in Belgium allegedly posted anti-Semitic comments on her Twitter, Facebook, and Ask.fm accounts, according to a Belgian former soldier and a leading Dutch website.
Zakia Belkhiri, 22, was lauded as an “inspiration” by the media as her picture next to Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) protesters went viral.
But web sleuths have now claimed that Ms. Belkhiri’s “peace sign” in the picture is perhaps out of character for her. They claim she tweeted in 2012: “Hitler didnt kill all the jews, he left some. So we [would] know why he was killing them”.
#ZakiaBelkhiri deletes @rabiosaaloca over 2012 anti-Semitic remarks after her résistance selfie in anti-Islam rally pic.twitter.com/EI3AGu7M7u
— SaadAbedine (@SaadAbedine) May 20, 2016
The tweet, seen in these screengrabs, appears to have been sent on the 29th December 2012, is now circulating social media as people attempt to draw attention to Ms. Belkhiri’s alleged racist views. As Ms. Belkhiri has now deleted her account it is not possible to verify these tweets.
Shortly before she deleted her accounts, Ms. Belkhiri tweeted: “I DON’T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST JEWS THOSE TWEETS ARE FAKE THEY ARE PHOTOSHOPPED BUT if you don’t believe me that’s your choice people”.
But social media users are also claiming her Ask.fm account allegedly read: “fuck that Jewish language” when she was asked if she wanted to learn Hebrew while critics claim her Facebook account expressed her hatred for Jews.
Immediately after the incident, Ms. Belkhiri deleted her Twitter account and told BBC Trending that “didn’t want to look like a girl who seeks attention”. It is unclear as to whether she told the same thing to the cameramen when she posed for pictures at the protest.
The initial story was lauded by Buzzfeed, whose writers called Ms. Belkhiri an “inspiration”, and by the BBC, the Telegraph, the Huffington Post, Vox, Mashable, Mic, and hundreds of other websites around the world.
NBC’s Jake Heller was shocked to hear of these past alleged postings by Ms. Belkhiri.
@AndieARBEIT @rabiosaaloca wow–didn’t know about this, obviously. thanks for letting me know.
— Jake Heller (@HellerJake) May 19, 2016
But the Dutch website Geenstijl, which delivered a Dutch referendum on the European Union earlier this year, was less shocked: “Do you remember? The Muslim girl… what a mischievous opposition, when this innocent girl clearly demonstrated of all that white fascism.
“Unfortunately, she proved no exception, she proved the rule. She is the rule. The rabidly hating Jews rule where the average Muslim is concerned… The Internet does not forget. And screenshots are eternal. Oh yeah Zakia, you want fame? Enjoy it girl. We’ll keep an eye on you.”
And while Ms. Belkhiri claims that she wanted to avoid fame, it does not explain her tweet as she was first going viral, which read: “I ain’t a diva but don’t push me fame is like the sweetest joy next to getting money”.
Ms. Belkhiri’s social media accounts were first subject to mass deletions and now have been deactivated in their entirety.



janeatte says
THIS WOMAN give the message that we are here , and we have the victory on you If you like it or not .
jayell says
Er, not really. We see this sort of thing all the time with brainless soccer supporters when they’ve had too much of the amber nectar before a football match. At least they might claim that the alcohol had caused them to lose their civilised faculties. I suppose you might excuse this ‘person’ on the grounds that islam had caused loss of its civilised faculties. The trouble is that whilst the football supporters will sober up, maybe with the help of the police, this organism has a more permanent problem. Or maybe she’s just doing a very good imitation of a pathetically intellectually-challenged bigotted idiot.
Shanti says
Evil is always destroyed in the end – as her friend and role model Herr Hitler was not so long ago.
Shane says
The problem is the traitorous left, including most of the media is on the side of the West’s main enemy – Islam. We must view the left as an enemy to be defeated and humbled.
bytheway says
Janeatte all I can say is that freedom has prevailed all through history…it has cost countless lives, but has always prevailed. Autocratic and despotic belief systems like islam and sharia law, with it’s hatred for Jews, women, dogs, infidels etc, will seem like it is winning the small battles for a while. I can assure you though, that it will not win the war. Freedom will prevail – so many people are reading and understanding islam more than ever. The truth about islam will ensure its downfall.
mortimer says
There is no good news in Islam.
Hindu American says
This self-serving muslima is just trying to project the image of a “see, I am so cool, liberal, emancipated, fully-empowered muslim woman”. She is obviously taking advantage of her western setting, with the two fingered victory sign of “poked you in your eye”. By the way, the protesting Belgians are all smiles and accommodating, a fact that just clearly whizzed above her shrink-wrapped head.
Perhaps she should try doing this in front of a raging, raving, co-religion mob, during the stoning a half-buried woman in Pakistan or Iraq, and then see how her coreligionist react to her dumb antics. See how long she will last there.
I also read somewhere that she spent the rest of the day deleting her tweets and posts that truly showed what she is really is, a bigot and supremacist. Good thing about the Internet.. one’s past is for all to see and read. Apparently she is now hiding somewhere in Morocco for things to cool down.
She is a role model alright, for all those twenty-something impressionable idealistic men and women.
Nick says
Hindu American knows what’s up
DJM says
“Peace selfie”? Obviously the BBC doesn’t know – or doesn’t care – that isn’t a peace sign, that’s a “V” for victory.
gravenimage says
Yup.
خَليفة says
Peace when palm is facing away from you ( the signer ).
And in UK, with palm facing the signer it means something else, like if the index finger were down.
Who is she signing towards? Which way is her palm facing? Looks to me like she’s giving “the forks” / “two finger salute” to the crowd.
Hindu American says
Peace sign to the camera but a sign of victory (of islam) to the Belgians.
mortimer says
Sign of victory referring to the Belgian massacres a few weeks earlier.
“Only eight weeks after her co-religionists massacred dozens of commuters with nail-packed bombs, a young Muslim woman mocks a group of [remarkably tolerant] protesters in Belgium.
With Islam, the normal rules of introspection, human compassion and humility do not apply.”
– (quoted from Religionofpeace website)
Hope says
Leave it to the liberal MSM to fall down and wet their pants over all things muslim, assuming it’s all good without bothering to check the facts and the details. This girl sounds like an absolute pig.
mortimer says
The Leftists are praising THEOCRATIC FASCISM.
Lee says
“assuming it’s all good” – Big Media journalists don’t assume it’s all good. This is why they won’t backtrack now this Muslim is exposed as yet another Muslim neo-Nazi. Big Media journalists *love* Islamic terrorism, they *love* Islamic mass-murders, head-choppings, burnings, crucifixions, slave-trading, gang-rapes, etc. Crimes against humanity turn them on, and especially if those crimes against humanity target Western civilization.
Journalists across the Western world continue to run a protection-racket for Islamic State, the Taliban, Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, al-Qaeda, Hamas, etc, and to protect all the Muslim clerics who publicly praise these groups. Journalists also run a protection-racket for all Muslim paedophile and rape-gangs across Europe. This is why they also declined to publicize the mass organized sex-assaults of non-Muslim white girls on NY Eve across Europe, where literally thousands of bigoted, racist, misogynist Muslims conspired to launch a mass-attack.
Here in Australia mainstream journalists brazenly write articles and make public comments supportive of the Islamic State. And*all* of our TV networks have run the same protection racket mentioned above, meanwhile stoking jihadi fervor with false “Islamophobia” stories. Journalists are resolute supporters of the worst crimes against humanity, and this despite the fact they are not Muslim, and so don’t have the excuse for their savagery that they were raised to copy Muhammad. Big Media journalists as a whole are the worst group of psychopaths the world has ever known, and from my own experience working in the media, are by far the worst, most chillingly repulsive, people I’ve ever met.
DFD says
*Absolutely true!*
Without media support the Ms wouldn’t have come near the positions they hold now. Whenever the Ms felt offended, the media was there to support, whenever they made a demand, the media…
For well over 50 years by now, the media pushes for more private debt, is jubilant that in the brave new world (order?) there will be no requirement for cash, etc. First homosexuality, now multigender… (about 6 months ago in a readers letter one guy said: “Thank goodness I will be dead before homosexuality becomes compulsory.”) Rain-bow-colored, multiculti, ad naseum. And more and more, by now the media is practically in a frenzy.
And of course, Christians are always bad, stupid, backward and even ‘socially awkward’. The latter, if I recall correctly, was in The Guardian UK, about a year ago.
Well, who owns the media? Who are the editors? Who are the advertisers? Just read it up.
On a personal note, I find it difficult to decide which definition oft the media is more apt, Pamela Geller: ‘Enemedia’, Germans: Lügenpresse.
Incidentally, in the run up to the 30 year war, with all the propaganda broadsheets running off the presses, the Germans coined an expression, they still use it today: Paper is patient.
davej says
She also looks like an absolute pig. Got that mean, militant sneer common to all Muslimas.
R Cole says
Just more of the Nazi-praising ‘inspirations’ ~ from out of the Left’s Islamic quarter!!
They all want to get in the mud and roll around with Islam – and believe if they believed in make-believe – they wouldn’t get dirty.
Though on Islam – the BBC, Huffpo, et al. should know better than to believe their own press!!
mortimer says
The Leftarded media know Islam as well as Neville Chamberlain knew and understood Hitlerism.
Murray says
Nah, they both knew all right, they just didn’t care.
gravenimage says
I don’t think the MSM knew about this Muslimah’s pro-Nazi comments. But they also did nothing to even passingly investigate Zakia Belkhiri before fawning over her–*that* is the problem.
Mark Swan says
Yes It Is
mortimer says
What is it that a supremacist wants?
Keys says
Generally, everything; including complete control, power, and dovish submission. They want to be the measure of all things and to be adored for it.
gravenimage says
Very true, Mickey–Muslims want to oppress and control the behavior of Infidels and of each other, including violently.
Quite the opposite of civilized people, who so long as other people are not harming others, are content to leave them alone.
They may seek to persuade on this or that issue, but have no desire to violently control others.
DFD says
mortimer says; “What is it that a supremacist wants?”
Errr…, Aggghhh… Humility? Tolerance? Friendship? Good question
mortimer says
Thanks, DFD. When I put that question to Leftards, they are often unable to answer, even though the answer is in the question.
I believe it is THE question regarding Islam that we need to repeat and repeat until the Leftards get it.
Zakia Belkhiri is a supremacist and a self-hating woman…but she is saying ‘I may be a repressed, beaten Muslim female but I’m still better than you najis kufaar!’
gravenimage says
Yes, Mortimer–Muslimahs are systematically oppressed and humiliated by Muslim men, but still consider themselves superior to us “filthy Infidels”.
Keys says
The look on her face is one of confident defiance, because she knows she will not be harmed for her “bravery” by a Christian cultured European crowd.
If she were a defiant non-Muslim defying a Muslim crowd, she’d be dead, and brutally so. Try holding up a cross or Bible while taunting a crowd in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, …
Jay Boo says
She looks lesbian.
It does not really matter to a Muslim husband though.
Muslim men do not reproduce offspring through intercourse.
They have solo sex using their ‘property’.
DFD says
Not too sure about that. Think: She could put on goats head, Muslim men would go bonkers and que…
Don McKellar says
Has CLOCK BOY friended her yet on social media? Shitbag scum moslem dogs flock together, and they’ve got a lot in common…
Keys says
Nothing will get better in Europe until there is “push back” and a price to pay. No pain, no gain. No sacrifice, no peace.
gravenimage says
Media darling Muslim selfie girl loves Hitler, hates Jews
………………………………..
And the search more “moderate” Muslims goes on….
Really, what could be “cheekier” than genocidal Jew hatred? sarc/off
Here’s a follow-up to this story, as this Muslimah tries to cover her *ss:
“Muslim Selfie Girl Returns To Twitter After Breitbart Expose: ‘I Meant Zionists, Not Jews!’”
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/21/muslim-selfie-girl-returns-twitter-breitbart-expose-meant-zionists-not-jews/
So–Hitler mass-murdering “Zionists” was OK? Last I checked, he didn’t really make those sorts of distinctions…
elizabeth says
Very important article by Andrew Bostom is relevant here: http://nydn.us/1TsZbes – “Stop Ignoring Islam’s Antisemitic Doctrine” –
Guest says
Hitler hated Muslims too!
DFD says
Guest says: “Hitler hated Muslims too!”
Indeed, he hatred everybody who did not follow or obey him.
==============================================
That includes Germans, he killed about 2-3 million Germans for being Christian and sticking to it, or atheists and not approving of him, etc. Apart from about 2-3 million Germans for the simple reason that they were Jews. Plus of course in foreign countries, the Poles and French, were extremely enthusiastic supporters
And here it gets interesting, there were plenty of Jews, who looked absolutely like his Aryan ideal – centuries of living together, or ‘inbreeding’ if you so wish. They were being offered to disavow Judaism and the Hebrew race. Some stood their ground, admirable, whilst others accepted the ‘offer’. Can’t blame them, can you?
So, why’s that interesting? Because it shows what a lot of bullocks that talk about Hitler and Islam is, he admired the ideological penetration, the spiritual stranglehold of Islam, that’s all. He was simply racist and supremacist. The Arabs would have been high on his list, since they are Semites.
That *bs* about Hitler and Islam, insinuating he was a secret Muslim, or at least sympathizer, or that the Germans are in love with Islam, is just that,*BS!*
Merely an attempt to combine anti German hatred with being anti Muslim, and so getting anti Muslims “into the fold…”
The idiocy of that can be gauged from the recent occurrences of proclaiming that Mein Kampf was inspired by his meeting with some Mullah in The ME. Pathetic propaganda crap, the purpose of which is unbeknown to me. Mein Kampf was *produced* whilst he was incarcerated, years away from taking power. Incidentally, I used the term ‘produced’ since it is assumed by some historians, and quite possible, that he wrote only part of it, the rest written by others and compilations. Here indeed he resembles Mohamed with his quran. But that’s where the similarity ends.
If you really want to know about the man, then read his second book, which he himself dictated fully – and get ready for something.
DFD says
Sorry, TYPO:
‘inbreeding’ should be ‘interbreeding’
Angemon says
DFD posted:
“So, why’s that interesting? Because it shows what a lot of bullocks that talk about Hitler and Islam is, he admired the ideological penetration, the spiritual stranglehold of Islam, that’s all.”
Indeed. I believe Hitler’s stance on islam is perfectly encapsulated in the following quote:
DFD says
Yup! His grip on reality wasn’t particularly impressive – to be charitable.
Jay Boo says
Order — a Ham Sandwich
Get — a Damn Sand Bitch.
mortimer says
Hitlerites like you are unteachable. I assume it is a personality disorder.
mortimer says
Hitlerites like you are unteachable.
Jay Boo says
Behold
The Defender of Muslims who refers to us as dirty kafirs SPEAKS.
A cheap ad hominem as an attempt to discredit without substance.
Your recently mocked Robert Spencer but when called on it you did not own up to your mistake but duplicitously changed your tune on the same article as if to suggest that was your stance all along.
HAVE YOU NO SHAME AT ALL?
You are by far the most insidious troll at JW.
You are ungrateful.
You sneaked in an attack on gravenimage who has generously defended you in the past and rarely criticized you when you ranted about me claimed that I always say “I hate Islam”
I am not the least bit intimidated by your claim of being an expert of Islam imam Mortimer.
Jay Boo says
PS you love to use the Hitler metaphor
Yet, upon close examination many of your comments contain jack boot reverence to Islamic think as if speaking in a 1st person anti-kafir voice.
P.S.
Muslims like her don’t just love Hitler, they adore goat sex.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, I do personally think Jay Boo is a often bit harsh with his disagreements with you–and I do not agree with him at all that you are a troll.
But the idea that Jay Boo–who is a staunch Anti-Jihadist and a decent person–is a “Hitlerite” is just calumny.
citycat says
Attention stealing, Islam likes glamour.
Glamour is magic like something for nothing.
A manifestation of the same old story.
Take take take take,
take take take.
If the infidels have it then take take take it.
No matter what, Islam won’t stop of its own accord.
It is impossible for an infidel to live with Islam.
East is east, and west is west and on and on the war goes on.
sham says
WHY MOST OF THE PEOPLES ARE ANTI JEWISH?
1) THEIR RELIGION BASEMENT OF RACISM AND HATE NON JEW:
HERE THE EVIDENCE:
Zohar, Vayshlah 177b
That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.
A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured.
Sanhedrin 59a
To communicate anything to a Goy(NON JEW) about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.
Libbre David 37
A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156
If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.
Sanhedrin 58b
[In other words, if a non-Jew kills a Jew, the non-Jew can be killed. Punching an Israelite is akin to assaulting God. (But killing a non-Jew is NOT like assaulting God.]
If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible.
Mas. Yevamoth 61b
[Again non-Jews are referred to as “cattle.”]
Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39
A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.
Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.
Gad. Shas. 2:2
A boy-goy after nine years and one day old, and a girl after three years and one day old, are considered filthy.
A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO TEACH/BELIEVE/SPREAD THE ABOVE LAW AS THEIR RELIGIOUS /CULTURE ,CAN WE EXPECT ANY PEACEFUL,ANTI RACIST,HUMANIST AND AN IDEAL PEOPLE FROM THEM?. .JEW NEVER/EVER LOVE NON JEW ,THEY NOT ASHAMED OF KILLING/CHEATING/LYING/STEALING NON JEW,THEY ALWAYS THINKING/PLANING HOW TO DESTROY NON JEW ………..
MY QUESTION TO SPENCER GANGS ARE U HUMAN BEING OR NOT?
ARE U EATING FRESH FOOD/WATER OR ANIMAL DUNG AND URINE ?
BEC’S A GROUP OF PPL PUBLIC ALLY ORDERED RACISM/TERRORISM ,U SUPPORT THEM,U DO ONE THINGS,GO TO NEAREST HOSPITALS AND CLEAN U’R BRAIN WITH CONCENTRATED ACIDIC SOLUTION ,BEC’S SATAN ATE MOST OF IT………..
WHAT ABOUT THE PRACTICAL SIDE?
2,089 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis since September 2000(ACTUAL REPORT MORE THAN IT,EVEN WESTERN SOURCE SAYS(ifamericansknew.org) )
9,271 Palestinians have been killed since September 29, 2000.
86,974 Palestinians have been injured since September 29, 2000.
at least 28,000 Palestinian homes have been demolished by Israel since 1967.
ETC
vicki says
sham man
http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/lie.html
“The Accusation
“To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if they knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.” – Libbre David 37.
“If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.” Libbre David 37.
While it is possible that the book Libbre David existed I have not been able to find it, even with the help of a librarian from Yeshiva University’s Gottesman Library. It was certainly never a mainstream book. In fact, it is strictly prohibited to lie about the contents of the Talmud.
Let us take an extreme example and see the conclusions of some legal authorities. What should a rabbi do if a disgruntled pig farmer came to his house, aimed a gun at the rabbi, and said “I want pigs to be kosher. Tell me, rabbi, are pigs kosher?”
R. Yishayahu HaLevy Horowitz, Shnei Luchot Habrit, Masechet Shevuot p. 33b (Jerusalem:1975)
It is forbidden to change the words of Torah even in times of danger; one must give one’s life over it.
R. Shlomo Luria, Yam Shel Shlomo, Bava Kamma 4:9
Rather we see from here that we are obligated to give ourselves over and sanctify G-d’s name and if one, G-d forbid, changes one law it is as if he denied the Torah of Moses… To [lie and] say that one who is innocent is guilty or vice versa is like denying the Torah of Moses. What is the difference between denying one word and denying the entire Torah?
According to Rabbis Horowitz and Luria it is FORBIDDEN to lie about the Torah or Talmud even if it means losing one’s life. A proof is frequently brought from the Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 2:1 (9b), Horiot 3:1 (11b). Another proof is brought from Talmud Bava Kamma 38a where the story is told of two Roman soldiers who were taught by rabbis the entire Written and Oral Law and found only one point to be offensive. Evidently the rabbis taught the truth about the laws to occupying soldiers even though the soldiers might find them offensive.
There is a dissenting view, however. The Yad Eliyahu (responsa 48) suggests that even though it is forbidden to lie about the Torah or Talmud, when there is a clear and present threat to human life it is better to lie than to have blood shed. According to the Yad Eliyahu, the rabbi would lie to the disgruntled pig farmer until he is calm and disarmed.
However, all agree that barring such extreme circumstances it is forbidden to lie about the contents of the Torah or Talmud.”
DFD says
To Vicki:
May should post that as reply to ‘cham’, but yours seems nicer.
Sounds right to me what you say. I am not Jewish, but I met and had friends among the Jews. I’d say that most of them/or you are rather decent and helpful people. And by that I also mean trustworthy, reliable; that refers to Hebrews on general, Jewish or atheist.
Though, one caveat, I don’t know about the Kasakhs or Ashkenazies, or whatever they are called. I am referring to the ones in the funny dresses. What I heard about them is not too good.
I gather many of these aren’t even Hebrews, and the Hebrews even in Israel have problems with those peoples, they are being called names, insulted, spat at even. Hebrew women are told to walk on the other side of the street, etc. Of course, I have no experience with those people and have never been to Israel, what I say is hearsay from Jewish/Hebrew friends.
As far as that constant moaning about the Palestinians is concerned, my reaction to them wouldn’t be nearly as patient and tolerant as that of the Hebrews, Israelis or whatever one wants to call them.
To those who wonder, I am Christian and proud of it. Born a Protestant but given up on denominations, Anglo-German by origin.
vicki says
A comment from another webpage http://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm concerning the untruths you spout.
“When I stumbled upon your webpage with what you claimed where quotes from the Talmud, I thought I would assist you in correcting your mistakes so that you may have an accurate understanding of what you clearly did not. However, after scrolling down I noticed that many of these books, “tractates”, whatever you want to call them don’t even exist. You even use the name of a 10th century commentator as a book. Here are accurate answers:
The lulav is not a trophy, it is a symbolism of uniting the Jews and hoping us all to possess good deeds and torah. Goy doesn’t equate heathen, impious, etc. Goy translates to any gentile nation. There is nothing more to that. If the Talmud ever refers to idolators, heathens, impious people it is referring to anyone, including Jews, that encapsulates these qualities. The Mount Sinai story recounts the receiving of the ten commandments and also of Jews who became idolators.. Its a well known story of the torah so I don’t understand how you can get that one wrong. There are 3 things, according to Talmudic Law, a Jew must never do, even if threatened by death. The three things are idolatry, sexual crimes and murder. These apply to all people. This sacred law alone discounts over half of your claims. Lastly, Kol Nidre isn’t a prayer and it only applies to specific vows made between 2 Jews. Any other vow that exists outside the jewish judicial system must still be upheld. Its difficult to give you the benefit of the doubt, attributed by ignorance, when outright lies are printed to be true. All I can hope is that you can accept that you were wrong, if you were simply making ignorant mistakes, and update your website to a truthful standing. If you are a self-titled truth teller, you should tell the truth. “
gravenimage says
The repulsive sham wrote:
WHY MOST OF THE PEOPLES ARE ANTI JEWISH?
1) THEIR RELIGION BASEMENT OF RACISM AND HATE NON JEW:
HERE THE EVIDENCE:
To communicate anything to a Goy(NON JEW) about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.
Libbre David 37
………………………….
Yup–sham has to cite false quotes from the Talmud to flog his vicious antisemitism. Even the Nazi Jew-haters at Stormfront question the veracity of this tripe–but it’s fine with sham. *Ugh*.
Notice the projection here in general. Muslims accuse Jewish people of regarding Gentiles as they regard Infidels.
But this is nowhere born out by actual Jewish treatment of non-Jews, either in Israel or outside it. In fact, most Jewish people are very egalitarian and treat non-Jews like everyone else.
Would that this were true of supremacist Muslims. Islam, in fact, sacralizes treating Infidels as second class citizens and worse.
More:
MY QUESTION TO SPENCER GANGS ARE U HUMAN BEING OR NOT?
ARE U EATING FRESH FOOD/WATER OR ANIMAL DUNG AND URINE ?
BEC’S A GROUP OF PPL PUBLIC ALLY ORDERED RACISM/TERRORISM ,U SUPPORT THEM,U DO ONE THINGS,GO TO NEAREST HOSPITALS AND CLEAN U’R BRAIN WITH CONCENTRATED ACIDIC SOLUTION ,BEC’S SATAN ATE MOST OF IT………..
………………………….
And now he is hysterically accusing civilized Anti-Jihadists of consuming dung and urine–how bizarre. It is, in fact, pious Muslims who consider the consumption of camel urine to be a cure all.
But this is absurd, in any case–this has nothing to do with treating other people well. Not surprising that a pious Mohammedan like sham would not be able to grasp this.
WHAT ABOUT THE PRACTICAL SIDE?
………………………….
As sham would have it, no Israeli–no Jews, really–should be able to resist the Jihad against them in any way. Certainly, Muslims would prefer it if they just laid down and died.
So very sorry to disappoint him…sarc/off
sham says
MUSLIM SAYS ” HITLER A MASS MURDERS,KILLER,HELL FIRE WAITING FOR HIM ,NOT ONLY HITLER ,THE EUROPEANS AND US(BOTH SIDE) KILLED 100 MILLIONS OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE FOR SHARING THIRD WORLD COUNTRY AND PRIDE,CHURCH CAN’T DID ANYTHING AGAINST IT,THEY ALSO SUPPORT THE KILLING /MASS MURDERS,THE WHOLE WORLD ASHAMED OF IT,NON ISLAMIC PEOPLE BLINDLY KILLED BILLIONS OF PEOPLE PAST CENTURY.NO MERCY AT ALL ,NO RULE ,BLINDLY KILLING CHILDREN,WOMEN,INNOCENT PEOPLE ,BURNING HOMES,POISING DRINKING WATER RESOURCES, I THINK ALL THE COUNTRIES MUST BE ADOPTED ISLAMIC IDEAL WAR RULE :
PROHIBIT KILLING WITH UNJUST:
5: 32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing the major sins) in the land!.
KILLING CHILDREN,WOMEN,ANIMALS,DESTROYING HOMES……
Malik :: Book 21 : Hadith 21.3.10
Do not kill women or children or an aged, weak person,Do not cut down fruit-bearing trees.Do not destroy an inhabited place. Do not slaughter sheep or camels except for food. Do not burn bees and do not scatter them. Do not steal from the booty,
Muslim :: Book 30 : Hadith 5756
‘A’isha reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) never beat anyone with his hand, neither a woman nor a servant, but only, in the case when he had been fighting in the cause of Allah and he never took revenge for anything unless the things made inviolable by Allah were made violable; he then took revenge for Allah, the Exalted and Glorious.
NO REVENGE:
Bukhari :: Book 8 :: Volume 82 :: Hadith 836
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s Apostle never took revenge for his own self in any matter presented to him till Allah’s limits were exceeded, in which case he would take revenge for Allah’s sake.
PUBLIC PEOPLE HAVE NO RIGHT TO PUNISH THE PEOPLE:
Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 173
It is narrated on the authority of Miqdad b. Aswad that he said. Messenger of Allah, you just see (here is a point): If I encountered a person amongst the infidels (in the battlefield) and he attacked me and struck me and cut off one of my hands with the sword. Then he (in order to protect himself from me) took shelter of a tree and said: I become Muslim for Allah’s sake. Messenger of Allah, can I kill him after he had uttered this? The Messenger of Allah (May peace be upon him) said: Do not kill him. I (the narrator) said: Messenger of Allah, he cut off my hand and uttered this after amputating it; should I then kill him? The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Don’t kill him, for I you kill him, verily he would be in a position where you had been before killing him and verily you would be in a position where he had been before uttering (kalima).
Do not mutilate dead bodies:
Dawud :: Book 14 : Hadith 2661
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to exhort us to give alms (sadaqah) and forbid us to mutilate (a slain). I then came to Imran ibn Husayn and asked him. He said: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to exhort us to give alms (sadaqah) and forbid us to mutilate (a slain).
no fight with surrender:
Dawud :: Book 14 : Hadith 2639
Narrated Jarir ibn Abdullah:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) sent an expedition to Khath’am. Some people sought protection by having recourse to prostration, and were hastily killed. When the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) heard that, he ordered half the blood-wit to be paid for them, saying: I am not responsible for any Muslim who stays among polytheists.
Fighting for physical earning prohibited:
4:94. O you who believe! When you go (to fight) in the Cause of Allâh, verify (the truth), and say not to anyone who greets you (by embracing Islâm): “You are not a believer”; seeking the perishable goods of the worldly life. There are much more profits and booties with Allâh. Even as he is now, so were you yourselves before till Allâh conferred on you His Favors (i.e. guided you to Islâm), therefore, be cautious in discrimination. Allâh is Ever Well Aware of what you do.
49: 6. O you who believe! If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful to what you have done.
duh swami says
You really think anyone will read all that crap?
gravenimage says
Yet more from the appalling sham:
MUSLIM SAYS ” HITLER A MASS MURDERS,KILLER,HELL FIRE WAITING FOR HIM
………………………….
What Muslim says this? Certainly not the one above, or any of the other Hitler-loving Mohammedans.
More:
,NOT ONLY HITLER ,THE EUROPEANS AND US(BOTH SIDE)
………………………….
So–the vile sham (or whoever he cribbed this from) considers opposing Fascism and ending the Holocaust as bad as conquest and genocide?
More:
KILLED 100 MILLIONS OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE FOR SHARING THIRD WORLD COUNTRY
………………………….
Clearly sham understands nothing about WWII. This does not surprise.
More:
I THINK ALL THE COUNTRIES MUST BE ADOPTED ISLAMIC IDEAL WAR RULE :
PROHIBIT KILLING WITH UNJUST:
5: 32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind…
………………………….
Qur’an 5:32 of course, has nothing to do with an “Islamic war ideal”–instead, it is condemning Jews for (supposedly) falling short of upholding their *own* ideals. It has nothing to do with how Muslims are supposed to behave, as Qur’an 5:33 makes clear.
More:
‘A’isha reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) never beat anyone with his hand, neither a woman nor a servant…
………………………….
This, of course, contradicts this Hadith:
Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates, “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”
Muslim (4:2127)
Here is the “Prophet” himself beating his child bride.
How can sham think we don’t know this?
More:
NO REVENGE:
Bukhari :: Book 8 :: Volume 82 :: Hadith 836
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s Apostle never took revenge for his own self in any matter presented to him till Allah’s limits were exceeded, in which case he would take revenge for Allah’s sake.
………………………….
Muhammed wiped out entire tribes. It seems that “Allah’s limits” were conveniently exceeded on a regular basis. He also had his critics assassinated–same deal. *Ugh*.
More:
Fighting for physical earning prohibited:
4:94. O you who believe! When you go (to fight) in the Cause of Allâh, verify (the truth), and say not to anyone who greets you (by embracing Islâm): “You are not a believer”; seeking the perishable goods of the worldly life. There are much more profits and booties with Allâh…
………………………….
Once more, the vile sham is confirming that his barbaric coreligionists can pillage the Infidels. And he brags about this. *Ugh*.
God Almighty says
BBC = British Bullshit Corruption. They need disbanding permanently, as Muslims need expunging permanently!
Lizzy says
Lefty media whore.
Richard Paulsen says
It´s sad this has come to Europe. WW2, arabinvasions of other countries since 600, Tours, Spain, Reconquista, Vienna, Balkan 1913-14.
Islam never giving up, Europe giving in.
Like being betrayed.
Vivarto says
Time to stop pretending that Islam can be reformed. Muslims don’t fit in civilized societies.
Give them a choice:
Leave Islam
or
Leave our country.
Angemon says
The usual patsies (MSM, virtue signallers, etc) aside, who’s surprised by this “shocking” twist? No one? You’d be surprised if she hadn’t said something along those lines? Thought so 🙂
Oh, and can you imagine what the end results would be if a non-hijabed girl were to go in front of a “sharia4netherlands” rally and pulled such a similar stunt? I bet she’d be attacked, her and her family would receive death threats, and the same people that were quick to exult this average muslima bint would look away, whistle and say something like “well, she provoked them”.
It’s not out-of-character because that’s NOT a peace sign, it’s a “Victory” sign – just another manifestation of islamic supremacism.
And that’s why you shouldn’t jump into bandwagons, viral as they may be.
Susan says
“LOOK AT ME! I’M A PEACEFUL MUSLIM!”
Bullish@t. Pure TAQUIYA!
Kurt says
Someone photoshopped posts from the accounts that were deleted.
OK.
undrbed cat says
May I be the first to say, she might get a invite to the Pennsylvania Ave in Washington and get a selfie with Ob….and then we can watch a speech on diversity, tolerance, peaceful muslims, and shades of white hate….a lecture on arrogance, the gift of Islam. With all the incredible marketing of pretty woman in political hijab which has shades of habits of the non believers,( but believers in Christianity. )Although Christians nor Jews are really not tolerated by the muslims, and the propaganda has nearly convinced the unknowing public we are people of the bad, since we showed up in the middle east, not to save the Christians or Jews. but to help spread sharia….maybe unknowingly at first..Misdirection by the finest.
Information on deception of doctrine counts and it is very much needed in a peaceful way.
Florida Jim says
She doesn’t know a single Jew she has been brainwashed into hating Jews,, Americans and Infidels the sorry education of muslims.
Kepha says
Of course the MSM will cover for a “minority” seemingly standing up to a well-disciplined, mannerly crowd of people who are worried about islamic aggression; and the MSM will never investigate its hero/ine of the moment.
Danusha Goska says
Someone good at photoshop please extract the image of the girl taking the selfie and superimpose it on a picture of a woman being stoned, a woman being beaten by the virtue police, and of homosexuals being thrown off of a roof. And share the resultant images on Facebook.
The point is that her taking a selfie in front of a group of polite and peaceful demonstrators in a Western nation is not courage and is not making any point.
If she wants to be brave, and if she wants to make a point, let her make it about gender apartheid.
Mohammed Khan says
Blinds will be blinds! She gave a wonderful message but you losers will always bark. Pity on you 😉
BlueRaven says
She gave the same message as ISIS and your LORD – mo. He smiled to the face and cursed in his heart. Your Imams tell you to practice his style. We are not blind. We know your game really well. You aint gonne win anymore. We know Muslims are deceivers.
gravenimage says
Mohammed Khan wrote:
Blinds will be blinds! She gave a wonderful message but you losers will always bark. Pity on you ?
……………………….
What “wonderful message” is this? That the Anti-Jihad protesters are quite right, that Islam is vicious, dangerous, and virulently antisemitic?
If so, you are quite right…
Walter Sieruk says
Of course she would hate Jews and love Hitler. That a typical Islamic mindset. For more about this kind of thing there is the site http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com
Mohammed Khan says
Do you dare to publish this: https://scontent-hkg3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13239089_607609072724821_7446290981529417065_n.jpg?oh=e1061fdb111c866f1ebedb79eef04f4c&oe=57E2E782 ? xD
gravenimage says
Uh huh–first Zakia Belkhiri claims that her Tweets were “photoshopped”, because she (supposedly) could not remember having posted them–even though this was just back in 2012–not all that long ago.
She then claims that everything is allright because she later realized that it is OK that she loves Hitler, because she was only applauding his murdering “Zionists” during the Holocaust.
How can Muslims like Mohammed Khan live with themselves? *Ugh*.
Angemon says
gravenimage posted:
“Uh huh–first Zakia Belkhiri claims that her Tweets were “photoshopped”, because she (supposedly) could not remember having posted them–even though this was just back in 2012–not all that long ago.”
Which is, by itself, very telling. Let’s say you had a twitter account and someone accused you of tweeting something similar to what this sow did. Would your reaction be “I don’t remember posting that” or “that’s absurd, I’d never, ever post something of that nature”?
BlueRaven says
Never hire this bitch if she ever look for a job. Keep a good tab on her.
George Poll says
And she took those selfies while publicly masturbating! What a woman!
Geppetto says
Given Ben Rhodes openly proclaimed assertion that the media is intellectually lazy, politically ignorant and ripe as targets for misdirection and propaganda purposes, it should be no surprise that “Buzzfeed, whose writers called Ms. Belkhiri an ‘inspiration’ ” and other mainstream media like the “BBC, the Telegraph, the Huffington Post, Vox, Mashable and Mic”, slavishly follow their long preferred narrative; Islam is a religion of peace and those who think otherwise are psychotic “Islamophobes” whose views and opinions are deserving of no consideration whatsoever.
It is also worth noting, as a historical indicator of human indifference when faced with unbelievable atrocities, how the west reacted, with heads buried in the sand, while Hitler exterminated 6,000,000 Jews. The west is oblivious to the fact that history is in the process of repeating itself, reacting once again with naive incredulity to the unbelievable brutalities and atrocities now being committed by a large segment of the Muslim population dedicated to the annihilation of the Jews and the conversion or annihilation of all other non-Muslims or Muslims who are unorthodox and not dedicated to the Jihad.
mortimer says
Quote: “Ben Rhodes … proclaimed … that the media is intellectually lazy, politically ignorant and ripe as targets for misdirection and propaganda purposes”
Brilliant.
Gepetto continued: “…when faced with unbelievable atrocities, how the west reacted, with heads buried in the sand, while Hitler exterminated 6,000,000 Jews. The west is oblivious to the fact that history is in the process of repeating itself”
That’s well said.
Would you agree that, besides stupidity and laziness, the explanation is that SOME of Western media, academics and politicians have been bribed by wealthy Gulf countries to whitewash Islam? Personally, I can’t find another explanation for the persistent lack of interest in learning Islamic doctrine in the face of ongoing atrocities by Muslims on every continent! The bold denials of the inherent violence within Islam can only be explained by bribery, imho. I assume that journalists (however biased) have SOME intelligence and SOME curiosity.
Jay Boo says
The old worn — Bribery Meme
Mortimer (trying to shift course) said,
“Personally, I can’t find another explanation for the persistent lack of interest in learning Islamic doctrine in the face of ongoing atrocities by Muslims on every continent! ”
——————————————–
Despite his qualifier of (SOME), if Mortimer can find no other reason it is only because he avoids looking.
The old white-wash accusation of bribery feeds into Islam’s false meme that people in the West are nothing but hopelessly MATERIALISTIC which implies that no one in the West has any moral high ground to stand upon.
Jay Boo says
@Geppetto
Bystander Syndrome
The Bystander Effect:The Death of Kitty Genovese
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdpdUbW8vbw
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/03/11/50-years-later-kitty-genovese-murder-still-grips-nyc-nation/
somehistory says
This is an *in your face* taunt. The pokey lips are a hallmark of the young who are imagining all of the people who will be looking at them in an admiring way.
She will be followed up by others who wish to have the same notoriety she has achieved.
And is anyone else tired…really, really tired, of the idiot moslim who was on “Dr. Drew” and began her little speech with, “Myself and others in the.moslim community…:?
Anytime the show is advertised, my head does a strong, stomach intoning cringe. Wearing out my mute button. And it isn’t just the very poor grammar that I can’t stand.
underbed cat says
The background is the point of her peace or victory sign selfie…….a covered muslim woman protesting the presence of those ( racist, bigots. islamaphobes) who might expose the forbidden doctrine of terror….and show the connective entangles it might have with what she will defend so it is a charitable contribution to her cause and marketing.
Classified says
Quran is full of satanic verses. It should be amended to suite the modern civilized societies. How can it claim that it is a religion of peace? How can it say that it respects women. Women are taken as secondary human beings. Read Sura An Nisa. It give’s the husband the right to assault wife when she does anything wrong. When a Muslim changes his/her religion what fate does her/her have: easy! they would be killed. Quaran and its followers are cultists. Muslims should not kill the people who accepted them in open arms when in trouble. Terrorism should always must be removed with whatever the resources available as soon as possible. The more you take time more the suffering to the decent civilized people continue.
daniel sebold says
Wow, she was a nobody and now she is as famous as Mel Gibson. Doesn’t take much
Stephen Triesch says
The media are always eager to publish feel-good stories of innocent Muslims who endure some sort of hardship, and to elevate to the status of celebrity any Muslim – particularly attractive, female Muslims – who stand up to the “irrationality” of Western “Islamophobia.”
They are much less likely to highlight the almost daily crimes of Muslims – in or out of the Muslim world – against non-believers or moderate Muslims. Those crimes – especially if they occur in Europe – are typically deemed not to be newsworthy.
daniel sebold says
Sorry. I misunderstood the context: they were praising her for her peace symbol not knowing she was tweeting hatred of Jews. This would make an excellent example of dramatic irony to be taught in an English class.
siesmann says
Taqiyya;she is being a true Muslim!!!