The problem with both Jourova’s and White’s statements below, and with this whole initiative, is that they assume that “hate speech” is an entity that can be identified objectively, when actually it is a subjective judgment based on one’s own political preconceptions. And given the years-long insistence from Leftists and Islamic supremacists that any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism constitutes “hate speech,” these new rules could mean the end of opposition to jihad terror on the Internet.
My guess is that “Robert Spencer should be lynched…” will not be considered hate speech, since Twitter just told me yesterday that it wasn’t, but that a factual statement such as this will be: “Violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history and a central element of Islamic theology. Many passages of the Qur’an and sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad are used by jihad warriors today to justify their actions and gain new recruits.”
This could be the end, folks. Opponents of jihad terror could be gone from the Internet within days.
“EU links up with Twitter, tech firms to combat hate speech,” AP, May 31, 2016:
BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union reached an agreement Tuesday with some of the world’s biggest social media firms, including Facebook and Twitter, on ways to combat the spread of hate speech online.
Under the terms of a code of conduct, the firms, which also include YouTube and Microsoft, have committed to “quickly and efficiently” tackle illegal hate speech directed against anyone over issues of race, color, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin. The sites have often been used by terrorist organizations to relay messages and entice hatred against certain individuals or groups.
Among the measures agreed with the EU’s executive arm, the firms have said they will establish internal procedures and staff training to guarantee that a majority of illegal content is assessed and, where necessary, removed within 24 hours. They have also agreed to strengthen their partnerships with civil society organizations who often flag content that promotes incitement to violence and hateful conduct. The European Commission and the firms have also agreed to support civil society organizations to deliver “anti-hate campaigns.”
“The internet is a place for free speech, not hate speech,” said Vera Jourova, the EU commissioner responsible for justice, consumers and gender equality. She added that the code of conduct, which will be regularly reviewed in terms of its scope and its impact, will ensure that public incitement to violence to hatred has “no place online.”
The firms themselves say there’s no conflict between their mission statements to promote the freedom of expression and clamping down on hate speech.
Twitter, which has been at the center of much of the hate speech that’s spread online over the past few years, says it will continue to tackle the issue “head-on” along with partners in industry and civil society.
“We remain committed to letting the Tweets flow,” said Twitter’s European head of public policy Karen White. “However, there is a clear distinction between freedom of expression and conduct that incites violence and hate.”…

Jay Boo says
Ah — but, Lo and Behold.
They can’t stop anti-jihad.
Don’t they know that this will “only embolden” the anti-Jidadists and “Play into the hands” of those who oppose Islamic supremacists.
pdxnag says
I needed a good laugh. Fantastic.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Notice too, that anti-Christian speech including threats of violence, and anti-Semitic hate speech, will will not be censured or censored either one; those are, in the view of these haters, “not hate”, much like during the Spanish Inquisition or Nazi German regime.
Idania says
Two days ago Muslims were chanting, DEATH TO AMERICA. Is that love speech? Definitively liberals have to combat the truth, even at the cost of suppressing freedom of speech. Really, really despicable.
Shane says
All hate speech is free speech. Speech should not be censored unless it calls for violence against an individual or group. I guess many quotes from the Koran will now be censored as they are anti-Semitic and call for violence against infidels; on second thought, no the liberal fascists running the EU will never censor Islamic hate speech.
Imnokuffar says
On it goes until multiple and very serious jihad occurs.
More likely during the european cup.
A cup full of horrors and fears.
The French have mobilised their army, navy, air force, police and special forces this is to no avail.
Also most European governments have launched similar precautions.
The USA has told its citizens to be cautious.
You cannot defeat this you must annihilate it.
Margaret says
The people will never be silenced. Never. Truth wins.
Peggy says
It can be done. Let enough Muslims in and it’s done.
Sandra Lee Smith says
They’realready trying to get truth declared “hate speech” with criminal penalties attached , globally, via the UN, and here , through Congress both. Canada has already done so.
gravenimage says
Unfortunately, Islam has already won in too many places–all of the Muslim world used to be Infidel. Truth can be crushed if there is enough fear.
I am actually optimistic about our fighting Islam successfully; but it is no wise for us to automatically assume we will prevail.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Not “us” as in America, no; that would be a foolish assumption today. But Jesus is THE Truth, and He WILL prevail, even over Islam. He’s not coming alone, but with the heavenly hosts. Just 1of those dudes took out an army 185,000 strong overnight; imagine what 12 legions can do.
Jura says
Is the Quran to be banned by EU?
Imnokuffar says
Yes.
Angemon says
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: social media is compromised. You don’t have to get ALL websites on the internet to agree with you on something, you just need to get the bigger websites on your side. Yo know what’s going to happen? People are going to leave Twitter and FB and join some other site where they can express themselves.
I’m guessing that by “terrorist organizations” they don’t mean “islamic terror groups” but “people who point out that islamic terror groups are acting according to what their religion teaches them”.
“Hate speech” is in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder. There’s no free speech without “hate speech”. There are already laws in place governing speech. Dishing out penalties because someone got their feelings hurt is a terrible idea.
Those firms should get their names added to the dictionary entry of “cognitive dissonance”.
Sandra Lee Smith says
To say the least!
Ciudadano says
Who decides what is hate speech? The Ministry Of Truth, of course.
Lucretius says
Why the “civil society organizations who often flag content.” Aka, the SJWs, the likes of CAIR, ‘intersectional feminists’, the SPLC, everyone who thinks shouting down, shutting down and deplatforming prevents hate with their message of love.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Except their collective message IS HATE, not love, to anyone!
Peggy says
And who gave the the right to be ultimate arbitrator?
You can’t just take power. If they can, then so can we.
robert says
I assure you that the same folks who are able to hack national governments will establish alternate sites where speech will remain free. All but the idiots will move to the new sites and the fight will start over. As for the “war” against Islamic terror, the “conversation” will soon move from talk to action. That move is inevitable whether the ragheads bring it to us or we take it to them. What we need now is a president equal to the challenge.
Nigel GFF says
‘Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.’
Unless you’re a … (insert as required).
Miao Zedong says
The EU will be stomped out within two decades by its own citizens.
Jura says
Well, question is if it will be the “New Europeans” or the old ones.
Miao Zedong says
Indeed.
Steve K says
Call it the EU, Big Brother is Watching, Agreement
Going after “terrorism” is the pretext, but of course the real goal, as usual, is for the left to stamp out all dissent. This new “cooperative effort” is being brought to us by the same mindset of those who brought us fascist speech codes on American college campuses, who are raiding the homes of German citizens who don’t like Chancellor Merkel’s policies, and the Obama administrations suing of global warming skeptics. What could possibly go wrong?
Tina says
Free speech is in danger in EU since anything you say against this muslim invasion is considered hate speech.EU will do anything to silence people who try to talk against it or try to tell about the crimes muslims do in our countries.
Luke Andrews says
This will make it MORE difficult for law enforcement to listen in on jihadi conversations.
mortimer says
The Cultural Marxist speech code: Thou shalt not criticize the officially-protected victims that we have certified. White Christian males may be criticized as much as anyone likes, for they are official-certified by cultural Marxists as ‘the problem’, colonialists, racists, etc. Any hate speech against them is not considered hate speech but the OFFICIAL, HOLY DOCTRINE OF CULTURAL MARXISM which will be modified or suddenly changed next week. In the meantime, WE THE CULTURAL MARXISTS ARE IN CHARGE. DON’T FORGET IT.
mortimer says
Unelected bodies are deciding subjectively what ‘hate speech’ is, and no one can disagree with them.
Rev g says
There is no such thing as hate speech. What some may see as hateful, others may delight in hearing.
Ralph Statum says
The Bible tells us that every human has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God which is is a heart-penetrating truth. He has provided a way to cleanse us of our sins since we can never be “good enough” to cleanse ourselves. That avenue to God’s grace, mercy and forgiveness (the cleansing of our sins) is through His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ of Nazareth Who is equally God.
Not one of us are guaranteed a “tomorrow”. Has your time run out? Will you continue to ignore the promptings of God the Holy Spirit or have you awakened to the essential need for God, risking eternal damnation?
God the Holy Father, God the Holy Son and God the Holy Spirit are One God, the true, living, uncreated God Who is ever-present, all knowing, all powerful and all loving. He desires that every single person be forgiven, saved and to live eternally with Him. He is our only real protection and His love for you is unchanging. Accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, the true Messiah, today.
Carolyne says
I do not believe that one religion will demolish another religion. In the case of Islam, only physical, not mythological, force will demolish it. If there were a loving and merciful God, This situation would not exist and the Christian God, if He/She existed, would not allow it. I understand that many believe in the supernatural , I do not.
Dean says
The separation of church and state was and is an indispensable part of the historical American success. There is the rational and the irrational and everything about Islam can be challenged with rational arguments and a holy war against it only validates it claim of being a religion. Our own history is a long list of religious oppression, frequently bloody, overcome by rational and enlightened opposition. Even for the enlightened Christian, God gave man reason so he can manage his own affairs.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Uh, no, there is NO Constitutional “separation” of Church and State! That’s a lib myth that only cropped up in the last century! Oh , and the perpetrators of that myth are THE MOST unenlightened among us!
Dean says
For Sandra Lee, the conversation was about making this a religious war and I won’t hold my breath while you expect God to intervene. The establishment clause does separate church and state but you are confusing progressives redefining it to mean denying our Christians heritage or are you confusing it to establish a church. Church is not synonymous with religion and the separation was discussed, argued and accepted begrudgingly by the founders while a prohibition against references to God and a religion wasn’t even contemplated.
Sandra Lee Smith says
ALL that refers to is establishing 1denomination over others as the “State” Church. The rest of it is a flat out lie.
Dean says
No state church means no church, not a Christian one in general but no church. In response to the redefining by progressives of the original intent by the founders, a counter argument by conservatives was developed to suggest no church doesn’t really mean no church. Being wrongly attacked for your religious references doesn’t justify wrongly redefining the original intent that was thoroughly argued by many who had to set aside their own church doctrines to avoid being overtaken by another church. Religion was not in issue but calling me a liar may play to your religious supporters but it is nonetheless absolutely incorrect.
Rev g says
Odd, the man who penned the words about separation of church and state supported and allowed church services to be held in the Capitol building.
I would imagine that he knew what he said better than you do
Dean says
The common practice of letting church activities overlap into government functions was acceptable despite the intended separation and that is not the only example of not honoring the Constitution from the very start does not change the original intent. The overlap between the shared religious heritage and specific church activities makes it difficult to understand the distinction. While in law school more than four decades ago and after personal research I had to inform my libertarian friends that freedom of religion did not mean freedom from religion, and that to even the serious Christian libertarians, since religion has been an accepted part of the heritage. But the intent to separate church and state was being implemented through the process of striking down blue laws, restrictions against birth control and others one by one since our beginning. The 10 commandments on the capital building or a prayer is not an infringement but interfering with one’s property and life is.
Rev g says
Of course! When the actual founders found that such activities DID NOT violate their words OR intentions, they were wrong.
You know better, centuries after the fact.
HILARIOUS!!!
Dean says
Even the exceptional have faults especially when it comes from deeply felt feelings. The anti-slavery founders compromised their moral principles to form the new nation so continuing with traditional religious activities and laws was relatively minor, and i accept them for both since i don’t substitute my personal views for those living the life. I think the more important division would have been between state and education but considering their historical knowledge of that problem also explains what now looks like a huge mistake. To respect someone do you have to worship them?
Rev g says
It is a shame. Had you been born earlier, you could have straightened those brain dead founders out!
At least the collegiate experience made you an educated ass.
Dean says
You obviously want to establish a national church and want to pretend that the Constitution doesn’t prevent it. I wonder if you can even understand half of what i explained. Goodbye idiot.
Rev g says
I see you are inept at reading minds, and also inept at realizing that others are much more intelligent than “Your Pompous Self”
You should try stand up.
Sandra Lee Smith says
I don’t believe Dean wants to be bothered by the facts, Rev G. I told him the same thing and he rejected it then too. Sad, but people really have no more idea what our Founding documents say and mean, than they do the Word of God.
Rev g says
When a person tries to make a case that they know what someone was thinking better than the thinker themself, that is silly. When they assert the same thing regarding a group, that is lunacy.
When they then use such lunacy to try and reinterpret documents written by that group, contrary to the easily understood words as written, that is absurdity.
Conclusion….we have a silly, absurd, lunatic on our hands.
Sandra Lee Smith says
I concur; excellent diagnosis.
Rev g says
Please explain, how does allowing religious services to occur in a federal building violate the Constitution?
I would imagine that similarly, the armed forces should not be allowed to teach Judo, as it is creating a national martial art?
I bet you have plenty of ex-friends, Mr. Think You Know It All.
Emphasis on think, which you obviously do poorly.
Gary says
The Lord Jesus told His disciples in John 16:2, “an hour is coming for everyone who kills you to think that he is offering service to God.” That hour has now come.
Cleartext: Don’t tell the truth – Jesus IS Lord. allah IS a lie from the pit of hell.
Gary says
……tell the truth, at risk of persecution!!
Nonetheless….
The Truth IS the truth. Not a lie from the pit of hell.
Champ says
“Not a lie from the pit of hell.”
That certainly describes islam! …P U what’s that foul smell from the pit of hell? ..it’s islam!
Guest says
Twitter and Facebook wouldn’t know hate speech if it slapped the in the face.
Jerry says
Please advise, is this hate speech?
~Please don’t rape our women and children, muslim men.
~Please don’t blow us up or shoot us, muslim terrorists.
~Please don’t preach your antisemitism and jihad, imams.
~Please don’t persecute religious minorities, muslim bigots.
~Please don’t beat or deny women equal rights, muslim bullies
~Please don’t murder homosexuals, muslim haters.
~Please don’t try & impose barbaric sharia on our democratic, free lives, muslim tyrants.
~Please don’t murder apostates, throw acid in women’s faces, sexually mutilate girls, honor kill your family, or conduct riots while threatening to conquer us for sharia.
I just need to know if politely requesting that muslims not murder, rape, and torture us for their religion is too insensitive to post online. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
gravenimage says
Good post, Jerry.
TJFreedomjihad says
There are special times in which Robert rises to a level of plain truths that exemplify the lessons of the three most historic Greek philosophers, one special one being this, Socrates, with a quick summary here:
Socrates believed that we are born with an innate understanding in TRUTH, BEAUTY, JUSTICE.
“Socrates remained an outspoken critic of the new government.” ….”He was charged with corrupting the youth of Athens and with IMPIETY. Despite his eloquent defense, Socrates was found guilty and sentenced to death.”…
“SOCRATES REMAINED STAUNCHLY TRUE TO HIS BELIEFS, REFUSED TO RECANT ANY OF HIS STATEMENTS, AND ALSO REFUSED TO ACCEPT EXILE OVER DEATH. HE TOOK A CUP OF HEMLOCK SURROUNDED BY HIS FRIENDS, AND, COMFORTING THEM, DRANK THE POISON THAT WOULD END HIS LIFE.”
Socrates is considered to be among the most influential Western philosophers. ALTHOUGH HE NEVER WROTE A WORD HIMSELF, THE MANY WORKS OF HIS STUDENT, PLATO, PROVIDES A WINDOW INTO SOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY. His major contribution to the study of philosophy was to redirect inquiries away from the natural sciences and TOWARD THE CONTEMPLATION OF SYSTEMS OF ETHICS AND QUESTIONS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT.
http://www.watson.org/~leigh/philo.html#socrates
Pilot didn’t like TRUTH challenging his order of the ‘Holy Roman Empire’, and ultimately had the Christ, Jesus, put to excruciating death, as the satanic devils of islam, the greatest bigot hate gangland empire in all history of man, are notorious for.
Our youth and too many of adults are already corrupted, and already impious. Thus are the sadness of the ages. FAITH, SPIRIT, TRUTH BEAUTY JUSTICE? Democrats and others daily show their lack of these ennobling values, and even show a love of criminality and criminals.
It is my learned opinion, that Robert as today, often rises to the lofty examples of our incredible Western Greek Greats forebears, and it is clear he hates evil as we all do, and that is among Christ’s lessons, from the Bible!!! We all share in earning the enmity of our mutual self-declared enemy-the satanic cult gang, by telling the purest truths of their bigots and fools, true hate manuals of mankind’s destruction…..All who have truly studied them, know this as well, as we exist.
It comes down to either you love satan and its products, or you love TRUTH through knowledge, and it’s LIBERTY, JUSTICE, AND BEAUTY.
Jerry says
Why is so much of the world embracing evil over good? tyranny over truthful expression? My comments were banned from Google+ for simply posting jihad versus without commentary. Not because of the inherent violence in those verses, but because I used them to rebut some muslim’s claim that islam didn’t teach violence. Simply using their own faith’s teachings against them is deemed hateful and insensitive. A collective madness has seized a large portion of the human population. It’s like the human race has given birth to a Rosemary’s Baby destined to wreak havoc on us all. But instead of impregnating a woman Allah has miraculously impregnated the minds of leftist fools with the myth of multiculturalism and moral equivalence.
Morality is getting perverted. Western women get raped by muslim men and they’re told to stay home as if it’s their fault for living. Kids get mass raped by muslim men and it’s practically hate speech to talk about it. Christians and other “infidels” are murdered and persecuted on a mass scale, yet the muslims are portrayed as the victims! And let me interject here at this point, isn’t that f*cking amazing? Kill kill kill, rape rape rape, torture torture torture, these muslims are so against us. But the only thing the leftist world can talk about is all that naughty hate speech against the poor and suffering muslims. But it’s not hate speech, it’s the truth. And even if it were hate speech I believe it to be well deserved.
What we have is a new phenomenon of the demonic kind where educated and otherwise normal people have decided that protecting a fascist religion causing mass murder and mayhem is the right thing to do. We have about fifteen heroic intellects on all of planet Earth leading the battle against millions of psychopaths for allah. And I find that to be a very precarious condition under which to live.
Jerry says
Correction: “Jihad verses,” not versus. My bird brain always falls for that one. lol
Jerry says
And one more thing, I swear I’m going to throw up real blood if I have to hear how not all muslims are bad. Well guess what? those of us who speak out against islam and muslims are not all bad either. Some of us actually do care more about crime and religious bigotry than dark skin and curly hair. shocker! But we’re expected to bear all the casualties in this war, we’re the ones that have to take all the blame. Which is quite bizarre when you think about it. Who’s getting terrorized here? Threatened with sharia and violence? over run with dangerous enclaves? Why us of course! But if you watch the news or listen to a politician you’d swear we were the perps in all this. Practically never is the media fair in its reporting, we’re always the bad guys picking on those nice muslims. And that propaganda is always presented with some video of muslims quietly praying or walking down the street like actual normal people, when some clips of them murdering, persecuting, or raping would be just as accurate.
I knew after the Westergaard cartoon debacle of 2005 that violence and ignorance in islam was not an aberration. If the 9/11 mass murder of our people left any doubts that surely did it for me, I knew that islam was an evil paradigm no better than Nazism. The response to that cartoon satire was an international furor for muslims, with riots and murder, threats and recriminations on a mass scale. This was a shocking revelation for me. For analogy, it was like finding out that Christian snake handlers weren’t an extreme minority but were in fact numbered in the millions. Cartoons! It’s almost too retarded to believe. A frightening revelation that changed me forever.
No, there’s no room in the west for these people or their hateful, murderous ideology. And it may be true many of them are good people. But I don’t care, we’re good people too. And I’m willing to love us just a little bit more, our nation and future happiness depend on it.
TJFreedomjihad says
Jerry, excellently put, keep on keeping on!!!!
Rufolino says
Brilliant, Jerry. I too think it must be a kind of ‘collective madness gripping mankind’. It defies reason.
Constance says
It was prophesied as diabolical disorientation at Fatima, Portugal in 1917.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Reason, yes; prophecy, no. Yhwh warned that in the last days men would be lovers of themselves, calling evil good and good evil, and given over to their reprobate minds: well, take a look around! It’s not just here; truth is being rejected on a global scale as never before in history.
Champ says
I’m all for stamping out “hate speech”, but not for stamping out the TRUTH!
How far have we fallen to prefer evil or good? …to defend a lie over the truth? Snap out of it!
We must continue to speak the unpopular and unvarnished Truth about islam & company by exposing the evil within–and boy there’s a lot to expose!
TJFreedomjihad says
For America and the rest, both the uneducated, and the undereducated, and the evil ones, reality, In the Great Greek’s manner, is this, put another way:
tumblr_n6e87iwJ5l1ssryifo1_400-001
“A LIE DOESN’T BECOME TRUTH, WRONG DOESN’T BECOME RIGHT, AND EVIL DOESN’T BECOME GOOD JUST BECAUSE IT’S ACCEPTED BY A MAJORITY!!!!” [ nor even one person ]
That is also the example of a corrupted democracy (“by the (misled lo info) majority”), also, which is why a Republic is the better choice of government style, if education is rigorous, among most, and not necessarily only of a college type education, but including especially so that type.
If education is not rigorous, the road to serfdom is then well paved……into central planning and central power concentration, as now in America, and subsequent death to the masses, in countless millions, by the socialist or totalitarian leaders- ‘totalitarians’ – always so in history, NEVER excepted.
See South America, and Venezuela currently. Their ‘dictator’ has actually constructed the straw man enemy distraction, that America is soon going “to invade” them!!!!
They wish!!!!
Constance says
Abortion, the great lie against women, has already claimed approx. 60 million Americans since Roe v. Wade. It is also noteworthy that the plaintiff seeking abortion rights in that case never had an abortion and is now a pro-life advocate. Her case was fake and propaganda by the lying fascist pro-death cult modernist fake feminists. The same group who cosy up to is-slam.
Larry A. Singleton says
I have personally written Jihad Watch and many of the main web sites on the Internet regarding Fakebook and its fascist “Community Standards” policy. Once you’re arbitrarily blocked on Fakebook most of the other features are blocked as well. Including comments on websites totally unrelated to Fakebook but who use their comment function. You can’t Share. You can’t use Notes. You can’t Like. And as most of the blocks are at the behest of Mark Zuckerberg’s Muslim and liberal buddies “offended” by your comments, 99.9% of those people who are blocked are conservatives.
Aside from all that this is a free speech issue and the censorship of maybe millions of conservatives who use the comment functions on websites across the Internet. Unfortunately, most people have ignored my complaints and continue to use Fakebook. I’ve spent the better part of my almost sixty years going to local city and county meetings. Raising hell and “fighting city hall”. It galls me to no end when people bend over when it comes to Fakebook never saying a word in protest.
Here’s part of one of my “Letters” I’ve tried to spread far and wide:
Facebook Nazis and their fascist “Community Standards” policy 12-26-15 (Community Standards: See below)
How Many People is Facebook Silencing???
What Obama Just Did To Fence At White House Has Trump Smiling: President Barack Obama’s Secret Service unintentionally handed some golden ammo to GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump this week when it announced plans to raise the White House security fence by five feet.
http://conservativetribune.com/fence-at-white-house-trump-smiling/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=PostSideSharingButtons&utm_content=2016-04-29&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons
Incidentally, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, a avid open-borders fanatic, understands the same principle as well: According to the U.K. Daily Mail, the hypocritical schmuck has spent more than $16 million of his company’s earnings in the past five years to protect both himself and his family via bodyguards and other protective services — like, say, a fence. Isn’t it funny how far liberals are willing to go to protect their own homes, all while they demand that the rest of the country allow illegal immigrants to flood their neighborhoods? It’s more than just hypocrisy at play here. It’s an insidious selfishness that leads elites into believing that their interests trump the concerns of everybody else.
Maybe you weren’t aware of the fact that if you’re blocked on Facebook you’re also blocked from using the comment function on websites totally unrelated to Facebook. Even when you leave the “Post to Facebook” box unchecked. This is pure and unadulterated CENSORSHIP!
Facebook is not only notoriously anti-Israel, they routinely and arbitrarily block comments for “offensive” content without even checking the context. They also block you on behalf of those who have been “offended” by your comments. You aren’t even allowed to see exactly what “offensive” comments you’ve made or even “face your accusers”. Facebook’s “Community Standards” policy is just another form of Thought Control. If you want a glimpse of what Big Brother’s big brother looks like……think about how you are now almost paranoid about what words you use on Facebook.
Facebook Censoring Conservative Stories
https://www.facebook.com/UncleSamsChildren/videos/498506073678730/
“Liberals want to perpetuate the delusion so they can add one more victim group to the list of people they protect against Liberty loving conservative Americans who the left demonizes every minute of every day. Their insidious plan to divide Americans and shred the constitution must be stopped”.
The Facebook Wrath Of Khan by Danusha V. Goska
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262808/facebook-wrath-khan-danusha-v-goska
Trying to discuss Sadiq Khan’s victory within 1984 conversational guidelines.
The Facebook experiment: Do all lives matter?
https://www.facebook.com/theisraelproject/videos/10154696521302316/?fref=nf
The Israel Project recently posted a video experiment to test Facebook political bias, produced by an NGO called the Shurat HaDin – Israel Law Center. On December 28, 2015, two Facebook pages inciting violence were created with exactly the same content except that one was anti-Palestinian and the other anti-Jewish. Watch the video to see how Facebook, run by leftist Mark Zuckerberg (who recently vowed to make Facebook a “safe space” for Muslims), responded.
GOP Senators File Inquiry Into Alleged Facebook Censorship by Scott Mason. “… inconsistent with the values of an open Internet.”
http://www.westernjournalism.com/gop-senators-file-inquiry-into-alleged-facebook-censorship/
Prissy Holly: Exposing (Facebook Fascist) Mark Zuckerberg and a direct Message for the Rape-ugees in Europe. Apparently Facebook Fascist Zuckerberg has got this “Initiative for Civil Courage” and working directly with Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel to silence Europeans who speak out about the rape epidemic perpetrated by Muslim Rape-ugees.
https://www.facebook.com/PrissyHolly/videos/1724158677806864/
My friend was banned and his post removed for this “Inappropriate Content”. He describes the horror of the Holocaust. And what it means to be a Jew “We Removed Content You Posted”.
https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13151535_1004374592992941_1246946917806011541_n.jpg?oh=956bb9df5ced9b97856bf0e6a14b4943&oe=57DA947F
Our dear friend and brother, our defender, Ran Shirdan is banned from Facebook because of the following post. What do you think?
What you can do to stop the blocking of jihad news on Facebook
FEB. 7, 2016 BY MARC
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/what-you-can-do-to-stop-the-blocking-of-jihad-news-on-facebook
REVEALED: Facebook’s new plan to CENSOR “right wing hate speech” — but not ISIS recruiters by Ezra Levant 1-22-16
http://www.therebel.media/facebook_s_new_plan_to_censor_right_wing_hate_speechutm_campaign=rr_01_22_16&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
Are you worried about more Muslim rape sprees taking place? From now on, when you try to type about it, Facebook will block you.
Facebook Censors Michael Savage Post of Muslims Protesting (WND)
http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/facebook-censors-michael-savage-post-of-muslims-protesting/
Facebook has not explained why it deleted the post, but it provided a link to its “Community Standards” page, which lists “hate speech” as one of its prohibitions, along with “violence and graphic content,” and nudity.
IT’S OFFICIAL- Zuckerberg Goes Full STASI Against Facebook Users That Criticize Islam by Andrew Bieszad 12-18-15
http://shoebat.com/2015/12/18/its-official-zuckerberg-goes-full-stasi-against-facebook-users-that-criticise-islam/
Sound familiar? The “Ask us why?” “link” and “Community (Communist) Standards” page.
Islam Uncovered: An Open Letter from a Former Muslim To Mr Mark Zuckerberg From Brother Rachid
https://www.facebook.com/UncoveredTheRealIslam/videos/1143254769027021/?fref=nf
Mr Mark Zuckerberg said that he welcomes Muslims to Facebook, and that he will defend their rights, but he ignored the problematic doctrines in Islam; like hatred toward Jews and Christians. Welcoming Muslims does not mean we should not discuss their religion. This letter is to challenge Mr Zuckerberg to show both sides of the coin. Quran 5:51, 9:30, 5:82, 2:65, and 2:61, 3:112 & 5:82 the basis for Jew Hatred—Sahih Bukhair Book 26 No. 5389, Sahih Muslim Book 4 No. 1081
Facebook Is Blocking an Upstart Social Network. Should We Be Worried? By Klint Finley 11-12-15
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/11/12/facebook_blocks_upstart_rival_tsu_and_even_retroactively_removes_posts_should.html
New Facebook Dislike Button Will Delete Posts With 10 Dislikes by Bryan Gogol Sept. 2015
http://nationalreport.net/new-facebook-dislike-button-will-delete-posts-10-dislikes/comment-page-1/#comment-723517
Pro-Israel Article by French Philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy Returns to Facebook After Disappearing (UPDATE)
http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/10/25/pro-israel-article-by-french-philosopher-bernard-henri-levy-disappears-from-facebook/
This video is on Facebook. Look at the bottom left-hand corner.
Young Arab men asked what they would do to Jews
https://www.facebook.com/israelunseen/videos/815322685247229/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCbTRUryDjU
The Social Media Intifada: Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Used Extensively for Promoting Violence Against Israelis by Ruthie Blum.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/10/08/the-social-media-intifada-facebook-twitter-and-youtube-used-extensively-for-promoting-violence-against-israelis/
ARFA: Why Facebook Banned Satire of Palestinian Propaganda
http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/arfa-why-facebook-banned-satire-palestinian-propaganda
Facebook and Blog.com in Bed with Genocidal Jew-Haters? By Steve Bronfman
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/06/24/judeophobia-gone-mainstream-on-the-net/
Facebook Blocks, Censors Schlussel @ Request of Polish, Muslim Jew-Haters; HOW YOU CAN HELP By Debbie Schlussel
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/50764/facebook-blocks-censors-schlussel-removes-articles-polish-muslim-jew-haters-win-how-you-can-help/
Davegreybeard says
@Jerry
“What we have is a new phenomenon of the demonic kind where educated and otherwise normal people have decided that protecting a fascist religion causing mass murder and mayhem is the right thing to do. We have about fifteen heroic intellects on all of planet Earth leading the battle against millions of psychopaths for allah. And I find that to be a very precarious condition under which to live.”
Aye Jerry, I am with you Brother.
We do indeed live in “interesting” times.
Jerry says
I accept that compliment with humility. Not really, I’m not humble. lol
billybob says
Not only that, but it appears that we are going to get bombarded by propaganda…
From: https://edri.org/files/12152015_TaskForceErgebnispapier_eng.pdf
“Fostering a culture of communication; strengthening counter speech Combating racist and xenophobic ideologies disseminated on the internet as hate speech, and fostering an open culture of communication that is characterised by respect is a task for society as a whole. All stakeholders must face this task and accept responsibility – policymakers, members of business and industry, civil society organisations, the general public, and every individual user.
– All stakeholders recognise the value of counter speech against hateful rhetoric and therefore identify and promote effective counter-narratives, and support educational programs that encourage critical thinking.
Get that – “identify and promote effective counter-narratives”! OMG – I suppose they mean to amplify messages such as those produced by CAIR.
– Social media platforms can be a powerful force for raising social awareness and
promoting positive change. New ideas and initiatives to promote a safe and civil online environment are to be welcomed.
We must all “recognize the value of counter speech against hateful rhetoric”. I suppose they mean to end Islamophobia. We all have to start saying nice things about Islam.
TJFreedomjihad says
Well, there is always the reverse Golden Rule: do unto them as they do unto you! Is that hate speech? It’s more or less right out of the one true Bible, eh? Specifically, here in the picture of the pretty German girl with her picket sign- http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/05/turnabout-is-fair-play/
Says “I AM ALL FOR MUSLIMS TO RECEIVE THE SAME RIGHTS AND PRIVILAGES THEY GRANT CHRISTIANS IN THE COUNTRIES THEY COME FROM!” Is that hate speech, naw, no chance of that. It sounds so damn nice.
Certainly there are some ramifications there, as they, the muslims victims, might have to study up on the trilogy, etc. to get it all right in detail……’to do unto them’.
As one commenter states from Canada:
“They are moslems; the enemy, FGS! Have been for over 1400 years, still are, and always will be, yet our ‘leaders’ have invited the enemy into our countries!
The most INSANE event in human history is happening right before our unbelieving eyes…”.
Florida Jim says
Hate speech to Hitler, Mao and Stalin was anything they didn’t agree with that is also what democrats and the social media Nazis want as well. they must say what is acceptable.
Richie says
Does this mean that comments by Muslims calling for the murder of all Jews will be banned?
Len Vaness says
Canada’s Supreme Court has already ruled that even the truth may be considered ‘hate speech’…although I’d like to see examples of this, and truth that may not be considered ‘hate speech’.
Dean says
All of this has nothing to do with speech, including political correctness. Simply put, anything coming out of the mouth of someone they disagree with is branded hate as a way to oppress the freedom to think. Originally censorship was intended to prevent others from hearing disapproved ideas, but the progressives have gone way beyond that and their goal is to control what people think and banish those that don’t think as required. Speech merely reveals what one thinks. They are waging war on free will and free minds. Subject to political limitations and social acceptance, some are just a little ahead of others.
UNCLE VLADDI says
So: WHAT’S WRONG WITH “HATE-SPEECH,” ANYWAY?
These “Progressive” criminals pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).
So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!
Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?
NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.
Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed, that’s just the packaging, but because it’s fraudulent slander.
Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!
Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats… and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!
UNCLE VLADDI says
THE IMPLICIT CONCOMITANT COROLLARY TO THIS “HATE-SPEECH” QUESTION IS, (as Sheik Yer’Mami dealt with it today)
“DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT THE RELIGIOUS DUTY OF JIHAD?”
http://sheikyermami.com/2016/05/does-the-first-amendment-protect-the-religious-duty-of-jihad/#comment-118503
VICTIMOLOGY101!
Is inciting violence and endorsing any and all crimes (as the Qur’an clearly does in Sura 9:120) against ‘the other’ not because of any specific crime they’ve committed, but only because you must hate them because you have been told that your god does, “Constitutionally protected free religious speech!”?
I’m pretty sure it isn’t … unless as an immoral relativist libertine “liberal” criminal, you like to pretend the rule of law set down in the Constitution is a fluid and changeable “living document.”
After all, liberal criminals like to pretend that since life if too complex for anyone to ever be able to understand cause and effect, and so all facts are really only opinions anyway, that their entirely fact-free subjective opinions (like, that your stuff was really already their stuff anyway) are the diversely opposite equals to your silly objective facts!
Therefore, there are no real crimes nor criminals, because we’re all really only ever helpless victims of mysterious inevitable outside forces of predetermined predestination.
And since we’re all non-compus-mentis victims, the only real crime should be to accuse any other victims of having free will choices and of objectifying them as a “criminal!”
And so now, the American DOJ itself officially heartily agrees! See:
http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/2016/05/its-official-doj-says-there-are-no.html
sidney penny says
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/cal-poly-free-speech-under-attack-in-academia
Watch the last 10 minutes especially the girl who says hate speech is not free speech.
Watch how Robert Spencer demolishes her very calmly and logically.
No one should miss this Q and A