“Newcastle magistrates heard he called David Robinson-Young in April last year after receiving a UKIP leaflet at home. But a Newcastle Crown Court judge allowed the appeal, saying the comments had not been definitely intended.” What does that mean? That Aftab Ahmed did not definitely intend to behead David Robinson-Young, and therefore need be given no penalty for the threat? What it really means is that Muslims are now the masters of Britain, and must be accommodated at all costs.
“Aftab Ahmed sentence for UKIP beheading threat quashed,” BBC, May 9, 2016 (thanks to Susan):
A businessman sentenced for threatening to behead a UKIP election candidate in Newcastle has won his appeal.
Aftab Ahmed, 45, was found guilty of making threats to kill and given a community order, but his conviction and sentence have now been quashed.
Newcastle magistrates heard he called David Robinson-Young in April last year after receiving a UKIP leaflet at home.
But a Newcastle Crown Court judge allowed the appeal, saying the comments had not been definitely intended.
Mr Ahmed, of Winchcombe Place, Newcastle, had been handed a 12 month community order and ordered to carry out 100 hours unpaid work….

Jay Boo says
That ugly Frankenstein-face head should be beheaded and stitched back in place after suitable (Mortimer ‘deprogramming’) and reprogramming.
Angemon says
I wonder if the judge will play Professor Xavier, a mutant that can read minds, in the next X-Men flick…
Incidentally, does this judge has a name? I’m just curious whether it’s a dhimmi or a fully-fledged muslim.
Mirren10 says
”At Newcastle Crown Court on Friday Judge Edward Bindloss, sitting with two magistrates, said the panel accepted Mr Robinson-Young’s account of what happened during the heated conversation in its entirety.” (from the Chronicle).
A dhimmi.
Ciudadano says
This is a license for more beheading threats
David says
Can Great Britain get any more bizzar? ??
It’s absolutely incredible. And I just can not understand it. The British people used to be as SANE as the rest of us. WHAT WENT WRONG?
No go zones. Muslim gangs allowed to rape thousands of children! Whole sections of once proud London now OFF LIMITS to anyone with a white face? Traffic halted by streets blocked for muslim prayer time?
It will forever remain, utterly INCOMPREHENSIBLE to me.
Keys says
Tourism will nose-dive, if it already hasn’t. On second thought, maybe not. The OIC could send plenty of “tourists”.
Victoria says
Maybe the judge is a Muslim, too.
Michael says
“This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,–
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.”
William Shakespeare
Goodbye my love…
mortimer says
Judges should stop giving Muslims a free ride.
Western Canadian says
Pictures of this prostitute on the bench, the mockery of police who enforce sharia, bribe taking and/or cowardly council members, media whores… And the worst of all the whores in national government, should all have their photos and contact information posted on the internet, so we can all know who to haul into the trials that will (MUST) result when the fight to regain the west is seriously under way.
RM says
United Kingdomistan
Marty says
“Muslims are now the masters of Britain, and must be accommodated at all costs.”
Exactly.
To the Tories, mohammedans are sly, ruthless, dishonest money mad scum who will buy
arms for their own filthy states & property in London to launder their crooked business deals.
Ideal Tory clients
To Labour, they are victims of white oppression & Israeli brutality, their religion is 100% against
Christianity & Judaism & they thrive on government benefits. Ideal victims.
Our Westminster Abbey flew the Saudi flag at half mast when the last king died.
In Saudi, they confiscate & burn Bibles.
The UK is now beholden to Germany & the Arab muslims.
What was WW2 for ?
RICHTHOFEN says
David Robinson-Young and the CPS should launch an immediate counter appeal against this perverse judgement. A death threat is a death threat. Of course all defence counsels in such cases claim that the defendant ‘didn’t really mean it’ – ‘mens rea’ has to be proven – to prove or disprove ‘intent’ is like pushing fog through a keyhole with a knitting needle. The fact that this threat was issued and the recipient was in fear…is quite enough for a conviction and a severe sentence – this case, on the face of it, brings the British judiciary into disrepute. All this, of course, without being in possession of the relevant facts but, as it reads here, this is unacceptable!
Mirren10 says
”David Robinson-Young and the CPS should launch an immediate counter appeal against this perverse judgement. A death threat is a death threat.”
I agree. Outrageous double standards here. If a Christian, Jew, or any other religious denomination were to phone up *Khan*, and threaten to behead him, what would the Court judgement be ? I think we can all surmise what it would be.
”Of course all defence counsels in such cases claim that the defendant ‘didn’t really mean it’ – ‘mens rea’ has to be proven … ”
I’m beginning to think we need to rewrite mens rea. If we look at the full definition, “the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty”, what mohammedan could not claim it as a defence ?
In fact, didn’t the scumbag barrister for Abdelajo try to claim that very thing, in Court ? Abdelejo hadn’t committed murder, because he saw himself as a soldier killing the enemy. Luckily, the jury refused to buy it, but unless we change the definition, it’s exactly the sort of slimy defence weaselling barristers will use. We should knock it on the head.
Angemon says
Mirren10 posted:
“I agree. Outrageous double standards here. If a Christian, Jew, or any other religious denomination were to phone up *Khan*, and threaten to behead him, what would the Court judgement be ? I think we can all surmise what it would be.”
Indeed. They wouldn’t walk away from a “racially and religiously aggravated hate crime”, or something along those lines.
Annak says
Tony Blair admitted he ‘ made deals’ for oil. I think those deals included Sharia running GB because it is for sure. Special rights and privileges for Muslims, and not for infidels !