Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
This special edition of The Glazov Gang presents The Daniel Greenfield Moment with Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center who writes the blog The Point at Frontpagemag.com.
Daniel discussed Facebook’s War on Free Speech, unveiling how Mao’s Red Guard rule social media — and the dark totalitarian future it entails.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Daniel discuss Sex in the Islamic City, explaining why the key sexual appeal of the virgins in Muslim paradise is the marrow of their bones. To watch, CLICK HERE.
IMPORTANT: Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Also contact us about sponsoring a show and having your name/group promoted on an episode: jamieglazov11@gmail.com.
Jerry says
These censorship acts by Facebook and Twitter are no less evil than what Goebbels and Hitler did in whipping up hatred for the Jews. By stifling our views they promote sharia over our free speech and empower islamic hate by removing our moral opposition, which can hardly be good. It’s sort of a “kristallnacht” against free speech in my opinion, but it’s our computer screens that get smashed to hide the ugly truth. This censorship does nothing to stem islamic terror or cultural jihad. They do, however, aid islam’s evil agenda by removing our voice for human rights and good morals. People who speak against murder and religious bigotry, even in the most vile terms, aren’t the danger It’s islam and the muslims that live it’s violent agenda that are murdering, raping, and pillaging. But it’s all part of the false narrative, that a big part of the problem is that we “islamophobes” won’t lay down and die peacefully for sharia and islamic jihad. I wasn’t joking about Goebbels, I do believe he would be proud of Facebook’s efforts to hurt us. He was a master at control of the press, media, and public opinion. Apparently Facebook sees that as something worth emulating. Disgraceful.
Thanks Glazov Gang, I always enjoy watching your work. If I can help financially I will.
Jerry says
CORRECTION: “that live ITS violent agenda.”
I hate that mistake!
Nigel GFF says
Yes, a good, if disturbing image. This smashing of ‘screens’ is, in essence, being told to ‘shut-up’, be cowed. Compliance or submission doesn’t help – only the chambers and ovens will truly shut you up.
Today our screens, tomorrow……..
Today Poland, tomorrow the world.
Jerry says
“Where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”
Make no mistake, Facebook, Twitter, Merkel, they’re all in effect burning books. They are feeding the flames of hate that could very well be the end of western civilization and the start of a new age of terror. The burning has already begun. This is what Facebook wants to protect from criticism and rebuke:
Jerry says
People who aid evil with censorship bear a large measure of guilt and responsibility for that evil. The only thing for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing, to paraphrase a well-known quote. I mean, if these web sites wanted to error on the side of safety, one would think it would be on the side of free speech in opposition to islam’s murder, bigotry, and hate. Instead the people who speak against these immoralities and crimes are deemed the “bad guys,” while the true villains are literally dancing and cheering over our dead bodies.
This censorship is rarely fair to begin with, it typically favors islam’s right to be evil in the name of religion, but crushes any reasoned objections to it. Censorship is always a slippery slope, it vectors in one direction only, toward absolute control over dissenting views. And when that censorship protects crime and immoralities then that censorship is also a crime and immoral, even if it isn’t prosecutable. It’s just my opinion, but I believe it’s based on reasoned thinking. What these web sites are doing is sending a message to the world that they care more about islam’s right to be hateful and violent than our right to object to it and discuss it. But I say, there can be no “hate speech” against something that is so deserving of hate. You can only describe an ugly thing with ugly terms. Islam will always be ugly and hateful, even if Facebook prevents us from saying it.
Victoria says
You’re right that Facebook has moved into a different category when it engages in government sanctioned propaganda. But just its sheer presence on the internet, with no real alternatives, moves speech on Facebook into the public sphere. Censorship of speech in this case (if it does not incite violence) should be illegal, private company or no.
Jerry says
Yes, “government based propaganda,” that’s what it is. They are aiding a political agenda that threatens us all. It starts to seem awfully criminal when so many are terrorized and dying for the ideology they are protecting.
common sense says
I’m with you 100 percent Jerry. On all of this.
I’ve been posting the unspeakable burning of the Yazzidi girls on my FB page and everything else that I can about the dangers of Islam and censorship. I have to my surprise not been shut down yet.
Jerry says
…yet
Mubarak says
These restrictions on free speech are polarizing and counterproductive. Users of the social media will realize the censorship for what it is and flee to to websites like JW and the like. And in whose favor is that?
PS: a pity DG reads so fast from his manuscript.
underbed cat says
Great content at any speed. Quick mind quick speech.
Dealing with the silence of facts is like walking into a spider web…very sticky, hard to remove..when the power to suppress gets corporations to fearful of terrorism and is seen as a defensive move.
common sense says
America still has greatness but this whole situation and the people who ignore it and/or foster and protect this evil calamity of Islam are FUBAR. I have no idea what the hell is in their brains besides nothing.
I think we are all deeply hurt everyday with some kind of offense from none other than Islam itself and those who think they need to protect it. It just can’t be allowed to stand or be tolerated any longer.
underbed cat says
Maybe the restrictions is protecting the lives of the users. Will they also silence communication of plots or motivations.
somehistory says
If speech can be silenced, the truth will never get out, and that is the goal…to silence truth.
Watching the video about the women in hell with their bone marrow exposed is like hearing about serial killers who so enjoy the pain they cause that they lust for it.
People…generally…are fearful of serial killers and have hatred for them on the whole. Do we know anyone who *liked* or *admired* Jeffery Dahmer or John Wayne Gacy or Ted Bundy, once their crimes were revealed? Do people admire the serial killers portrayed in movies?
But, those same people are admiring the thought processes of moslims and the teaching of islam.
moslims are taught that death is to be sought and desired and admired…to the point of seeing bone marrow through the eyes of their lust.
And these same people who would show horror over Dahmer’s crimes, want the rest of mankind, the whole of society, to shut up and be quiet regarding the truth about islam.
islam is not to be admired or respected or protected. islam is the wild beast, the bloodthirsty beast, the never satisfied bloodthirsty beast, from satan the devil. Death is its method, death is its goal, death is its only future.
Jerry says
Good one.
Norwegian says
Well, if it forces many people out of social media and make them re-organize in a true social way it might be good.
I think it is to late for those magots anyway. Far to many people out there know now.
They can’t use umbrella when it is raining coffinnails in the horizon…
I want the elites to be put to rial for this and (i hope) hanged.
siesmann says
Disconcerting thing is that Trump also want to suppress free speech
solange silverman says
Just like private venues like sports arenas, etc, have the right to search people and forbid outside refreshments, Facebook and other social media are privately owned, and, so, can do as they please as far as censorship goes. Okay, but, if they are going to do it, their “community standards” should not be double standards. And, the truth, which has now been deemed “hate speech” should not qualify for censorship. That is the stupidity, ignorance and arrogance of the matter.
UNCLE VLADDI says
“Progressive” criminals pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).
So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!
Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?
NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.
Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.
Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!
Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats… and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!
Stopthatshit says
FLEE SHITBOOK IN MASS
That is so simple, everything work on economics and shitbook is no exception.