• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Sharia London: Muslim mayor bans “body shaming” advertisements

Jun 15, 2016 9:26 am By Robert Spencer

People often puzzle about how the hard Left and Islamic supremacists can make common cause, when they have such differing ideas of morality. Here is how: the Left’s concern with “body-shaming” and not putting people “under pressure over body image” coincides perfectly with the Sharia imperative to force women to cover themselves in order to remove occasions of temptation for men. What next? Will London women be forced to cover everything except their face and hands (as per Muhammad’s command) so as not to put others “under pressure over body image”?

tubead

“Sadiq Khan: There will be no more ‘body shaming’ adverts on the Tube,” by Pippa Crerar, London Evening Standard, June 13, 2016:

Adverts which put Londoners under pressure over body image are to be banned from the Tube and bus network.

Sadiq Khan announced that Transport for London would no longer run ads which could cause body confidence issues, particularly among young people.

The Mayor, a father of two teenage daughters, warned the ads could “demean” women and encourage them to conform to unrealistic or unhealthy body shapes.

TfL’s new advertising policy, which does not include all images of people in their underwear or swimming gear, is only expected to affect a handful of the 12,000 adverts a year which run across the network, including at bus shelters and on-street sites.

It means controversial adverts like Protein World’s “Are you beach body ready?” poster, which provoked a huge backlash when it appeared last year, would no longer be allowed.

The weight-loss ad, which featured a bikini-clad model, sparked a protest in Hyde Park as well as a petition on Change.org with more than 70,000 signatures, although it was not banned by the Advertising Standards Authority.

Mr Khan said: “As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies.

“Nobody should feel pressurised, while they travel on the Tube or bus, into unrealistic expectations surrounding their bodies and I want to send a clear message to the advertising industry about this.”

The Mayor claimed there would be no impact on TfL’s income as a result of the move, with the body still expected to generate more than £1.5 billion from advertising over the next eight years. Last year it made £170 million, up from £152 million in 2014….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Sharia, United Kingdom, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Sadiq Khan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. john spielman says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:30 am

    so forcing women to wear black garbage bags over their head is NOT public shaming?

    • vivienne Leijonhufvu (@goldaleijonhufv) says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:37 am

      As I said John Khan has used a clever trick to impose Islamic ideology. As a woman I object to the fact that we are constantly expected to look like fertile 25 year old women eternally. And forcing the burqa is unBritish and un European – Islam cannot be allowed to force its ideology on the rest of us.

      • Donna says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 11:44 am

        I couldn’t agree more with this comment vivienne “I object to the fact that we are constantly expected to look like fertile 25 year old women eternally”, unfortunately here in the USA our media hype that ideal also. Saudi Arabia seems to have come up with a horrific “solution” 70% of their population are 30 and under, I can’t helo but wonder what happens to their older women. 🙁

      • Vlad says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 4:43 am

        Won’t be long, but only after prayer meetings on Friday

      • Jay Boo says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 11:02 am

        “non muzlums” are shaming Muslim hijab and burqa tent wearing women with that billboard.

        If blondie was wearing a matching hijab, no Muslim would even notice all that exposed skin.

      • MaryC says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 8:46 pm

        As a woman I do not object in the slightest to the fact that we are constantly expected to look like fertile 25 year old women eternally. I’m way past 25; nevertheless I have striven tirelessly ever since toward that slender perfection, which has helped immensely to keep me healthier and younger. Nowadays I work out with weights to avoid the muscle loss that needs to be fought tooth and nail as we age. I am quite aware how much skin it is appropriate for a woman in my shape and my (apparent) age to reveal; revealing just that much and no more is an art-form I very much enjoy practicing. My only regret is that I was swayed by the whole ‘tanned is beautiful’ BS that until fairly recently prevailed as the cultural norm and now my skin is showing it, although there are some fabulous skin crèmes that can repair a fair amount of damage.

        I have seen photos of Muslim women covered head to foot on a beach alongside gorgeous Western women wearing bikinis. The faces of the Muslim women show excruciatingly who are the ones feeling shamed! It’s not the shame of Western women that London’s mayor is concerned about, I declare. Not only does he not want Muslim women feeling shamed, he doesn’t want any light bulbs coming on in Muslim women’s heads either.

        • linnte says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 12:30 am

          Exactly Mary C. He is concerned for his people, and his people only. His daughters especially. Heaven forbid that a Burqua covered woman would get the idea that she shouldn’t HAVE to be roasted alive. Oh, but that’s right Mr.Khan, 70% of women will end up in hell anyway right?

        • Donna says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 9:18 am

          @ MaryC I liked a lot of what you had to say, but have to disagree with this – re “As a woman I do not object in the slightest to the fact that we are constantly expected to look like fertile 25 year old women eternally. I’m way past 25; nevertheless I have striven tirelessly ever since toward that slender perfection,” – I say instead learn to appreciate and enjoy the age you are at NOW. If you always wish to look like a 25 yr old and live to 75, you’ve wasted 50 yrs of your life wishing you were something you weren’t. …and that’s a damn shame.

    • Ilob says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02 am

      What ever the media and the government does to please or impress Muslims or psychologically calm them down by these actions will not work out. Muslims are not stupid they will still do what they want as they are fully aware what people are like in the west whether obvious or hidden.

    • Jay Boo says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:12 am

      What about MUSLIM rape gangs mayor?
      ———————————————————-

      “Mr Khan said: “As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people”

      • DFD says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:04 pm

        Hi Jay Boo,

        Your question could get one into very, nay, extremely hot water. The press hardly ever mentions Islam in this context at all. But it speaks/writes about a minority of ‘Asians’ – occasionally, rarely.

        I lost the link to a drawing, it shows on one side a picture of a celeb, (I think it was Jim Saville) and on the other side pictures of 9 Pakistani Muslims. The caption read: “This man, and others like him, get headline after headline, issue after issue.” Under the pictures of the nine, it read: “These men were shown once or twice, do you know any of their names?”

        Tells the tale, doesn’t it?

    • Georg says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 1:30 pm

      “so forcing women to wear black garbage bags over their head is NOT public shaming?”

      No, that’s just swell.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:07 pm

      Good point, John–the idea that Islam does not shame women could not be more grotesque. Islam is all about shaming women.

    • Cy Halothrin says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:17 pm

      Stoning women to death, raping them, chopping off their clitoris and sewing up the vagina…are not demeaning to women. It would be Islamophobic and thus racist to suggest otherwise.

      • Lalo Rivero says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 8:00 am

        Cy,

        For what it’s worth – female mutilation is not really a ‘muslim’ custom. It’s done only in East Africa and Egypt… and I think, not sure, it’s done by some Christians in Ethiopia and South Sudan. I’ve worked many years in Gulf countries – Saudi, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Dubai.. Never heard of it done here except a few cases when it was done by East Africans, Egyptians residing in Gulf countries. The Dubai government will not tolerate it. .

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 10:14 am

          Lalo Rivero wrote:

          Cy,

          For what it’s worth – female mutilation is not really a ‘muslim’ custom. It’s done only in East Africa and Egypt…
          ………………………………

          Entirely untrue. This atrocity *originated* in Africa, but has long since spread to other Muslim nations. It is practiced in places like Iraq and in Indonesia–as well as in Muslim enclaves in the West:

          “New study shows that female genital mutilation is common in Iraq”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/04/new-study-shows-that-female-genital-mutilation-is-common-in-iraq

          “Female genital mutilation persists in Indonesia”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-persists-in-indonesia

          FGM is often defended and urged by Muslim clerics–on Islamic grounds.

          Saying FGM has nothing to so with Islam is mistaken at best.

        • linnte says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 6:07 pm

          FGM is commanded by the Hadiths.

        • Demsci says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 1:43 pm

          Given what you say is true, Lalo Rivero, Then still, what is the most effective policy agains FGM? Because That is the concern, for the well-being of countless girls and women, in the future,

          and NOT sparing the feelings of Muslims by “Declaring Islam not sole cause, therefore not a factor at all! Thereby jumping to a conclusion that might make us forgo finding truly effective measures against FGM.

          Reasoning that FGM is “not Islamic” for political correct reasons, and not holding Muslims accountable for their interpretations of Islam, which very probably for huge numbers lead to FGM is disastrous for (future) victims.

          The question should not be: Do other religions besides Islam, also promote and practice FGM?

          But: Does the religion Islam excacerbate or ameliorate or perhaps hardly influence the problem of FGM?

          And the evidence suggests that it does have the exacerbating effect!

        • Falsafa says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 2:27 pm

          Gravenimage true to form continues to spew hatred through his fictitious stories and myths about all things muslim. How else could he justify his hatred to himself? All these things including violence towards women in whathever shape or form he attributes to Islam have nothing to do with Islam! These horror stories are as alien to us – yep you guessed it…muslims – as anyone else. But bigots like gravenimage – the spin doctor that he is just like Mr Spence – will continue to spew his nonsense to feed his agenda. Keep at it gravenimage – you are very good(!) at what you do,

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 6:41 pm

          The foul “Falsafa” wrote:

          Gravenimage true to form continues to spew hatred through his (sic) fictitious stories and myths about all things muslim. How else could he (sic) justify his (sic) hatred to himself (sic)?
          ………………………………..

          These are not “fictitious stories”–the study in Iraq was done by the women’s group PANA, and the story from Indonesia comes from the Global Post.

          There’s much from other respected sources.

          Yes, I hate Muslims mutilating little girls–but Muslims certainly do not:

          “Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) (by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the bazr ‘clitoris’ [this is called khufaadh ‘female circumcision’]).” — ‘Umdat al-Salik e4.3

          Moreover, as I noted, Muslim clerics regularly urge the mutilation of girls on Islamic grounds:

          “Muslim cleric urges female genital mutilation”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/muslim-cleric-urges-female-genital-mutilation

          This cleric is in India, but there are thousands more all over the world.

          And yet his claims that Muslim FGM is “fictitious” could not be more grimly laughable–there are thousands of such cases, including that of Anti-Jihadist Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

          In other words, “Falsafa” does not object to the terrible abuse of little girls; he just objects to anyone *criticizing* it.

          Notice that he considers opposing the violent abuse of women to be “hatred”–but has no such animus towards the actual violence at all.

          If I were a Muslim lauding FGM for enforcing “chastity”, he would, no doubt, be fine with it.

          More:

          All these things including violence towards women in whathever (sic) shape or form he (sic) attributes to Islam have nothing to do with Islam! These horror stories are as alien to us – yep you guessed it…muslims – as anyone else. But bigots like gravenimage – the spin doctor that he (sic) is just like Mr Spence (sic) – will continue to spew his (sic) nonsense to feed his (sic) agenda.
          ………………………………..

          Certainly, not all violence towards women comes from Muslim sources–but then, this is a straw man, since no one here has ever claimed that it did.

          But his claim that violence against women is *alien* to Muslims could not be more grotesquely false.

          The thing is that the abuse of women is *sacralized* in Islam:

          Quran (4:34) – “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.”

          Quran (38:44) – “And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath…” Allah telling Job to beat his wife

          The “Prophet’s” child bride Aisha herself lamented Islamic violence against women:

          Bukhari (72:715) – “Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women'”

          Moreover, Muhammed struck her, as well.

          Muslim (4:2127) – Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates, “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”

          Muhammed’s other wives suffered violence, as well:

          Muslim (9:3506) – Muhammad’s fathers-in-law (Abu Bakr and Umar) amused him by slapping his wives (Aisha and Hafsa) for annoying him. According to the Hadith, the prophet of Islam laughed upon hearing this.

          And lest anyone think that Muslims do not eagerly embrace this savagery today, we have endless stories like this one, from just a couple of weeks ago:

          “Toronto: Muslim group gives out book saying ‘women may enjoy being beaten’”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/toronto-muslim-group-gives-out-book-saying-women-may-enjoy-being-beaten

          There are many, many more.

          And while I doubt I merit being compared to the courageous Robert Spencer, I take it as a badge of honor nonetheless.

          More:

          Keep at it gravenimage – you are very good(!) at what you do,
          ………………………………..

          This is, no doubt, intended to be sarcastic–but with all modesty I *do* think I’m rather good at exposing Muslim savagery.

          This is something we should *all* be proud of–except, of course, for Muslim apologists for barbarism like the appalling “Falsafa”.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 5:08 am

          Are the Muslim apologists intentionally or unintentionally distorting the facts? I consider Janakir Raj to be a scholar using my simplistic definition “A scholar is someone who knows a lot of stuff”. I know that many of his (her?) statements are completely wrong and other statements are internally inconsistent; but the writing tone suggests that he might actually believe what he is saying. A person’s reasoning might be correct, but if that reasoning is based on faulty assumptions, then the conclusions drawn are invalid.

          There are other Muslim apologists who make a few good points –easily countered – but none are as pathetic as Falsafa who wrote:

          “Gravenimage – true to form – continues to spew hatred through his fictitious stories and myths about all things Muslim. How else could he justify his hatred to himself? All these things including violence towards women in whatever shape or form he attributes to Islam have nothing to do with Islam!”

          That statement marks Falsafa as either:
          1. A Fool
          2. A person challenged by reality
          3. A small child
          4. An intelligent, well-trained, Muslim Apologist Troll.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 2:06 pm

          Ted, “Falsafa”–his perverse username means “Philosophy”, which has been crushed in Islam–is a long time troll here. He doesn’t post very often, but when he does it is always just this sort of apologia for Muslim barbarism. You are spot on with #4.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 10:24 am

        Why nobody is talking about aborted fetuses being added to pepsi & coke ? What about planned parenthood killings ?? It is the developppped christian west that came up with surrogate mothers & has exported it to India. Indian allopaths are no less avaricious & unethical. Having sperm banks & freezing of eggs so that INDEPENDENT women after making money through careers etc while hitting middle ages would fertilize those frozen eggs with sperms of some stranger in a petri dish making designer babies thus …what a developppppment……how very modern…advanced ….I am impressed. I read LGBT also want children . So this is how future babies are going to be manufactured in addition to abduction of babies from underdevelopppppped third world thirteenth world countries calling them ‘orphans’ adopted by commmmmpassionate LGBT elton johns & martina navaratilovas.

        Hindu God MaHaVishnu says ” Over actions alone you have choices. NOT over their Consequences “.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 11:01 am

        Do you know psychiatrists very successfully KILL people with their lithiums , tegretols , haloperidol etc. Recently one Mahadevan father of two daughters & husband of a celeb called Nithyashree a Carnatic cum playback singer died owing to psychiatry drugs. Others conveniently called it “suicide”. Often we hear of random shootings in schools , varsities in your developppppped sooooperpower america. All of them are made thus by psychiatrists. Suicides too are induced by the same mind altering drugs. Instead of blaming Mexico how about pillorying psychiatrists the most dangerous drug pushers ? You will not. As all think tank & elites of america KNOWINGLY do so. Another alarming trend in India is engineering accidents killing healthy people . declaring them brain dead & harvesting each & every organ including skin. What Robin Cook foresaw was just the tip of the iceberg. The relatives have no choice but to agree getting some free cash & faux glory as they face tv cameras boasting ” we are so happy my dead son/ daughter /. husband / wife is going to see , breathe , walk and talk through various other bodies….”.Many hospitals have invested heavily. How do they recover the costs plus justify their existence if not by organs harvesting. Hearts being harvested is the latest fad. During the much publicized rape in Delhi , the unperturbed doctors assured ” do not worry..we have just harvested uterus , genitals etc from certain other females who were all declared brain dead…we can easily implant them & give her a new life”. Do we need a rape hospital too whereby the victims are fitted with fresh organs harvested from hapless others ?

        Very IMPORTANT- Hindus’ Vedas FORBID such organs harvesting exported by developpped countries. But it is Hindus who are DENIED their rights. We Hindus do not bury but cremate dead bodies. A Hindu woman a Brahmin btw who has been working in a crematorium said bodies that have undergone postmortem and / or have had organs harvested pose lot of problems while being cremated. I am not writing the problems in detail as they are but bodies of Hindus. It is christian bodies that you people woRRRRRY about.
        You are free to follow your customs in your christian countries. Why impose such hideous monstrosities on us Hindus too ?? What kind of freedom democracy is this so warped so biased against Vedic Hindus ??

        In India lot of young children who were reported missing were found to have been killed to cater to demands from fashion industry , medical fraternity with weird demands.
        The culprits did not receive death sentence. Lots of americans , british etc flew to India to hush up during that time.

        Vaccine pushers like genetically modified terminator seeds pushers would always come up with wild statistics to carry out their agenda. How much of havoc has been caused by doctors ? You must be aware of thalidomide & what deformities it caused. Instead of owning up , allopaths have a clever way of playing around with words claiming “we need to do more research”. Doctors themselves succumb to various illnesses & die.
        Whatever happened to freedom of choice ?
        The arrogant surgeons & allopaths insisted on amputating the very arm of Sri.Ramana Bhagavan. He told them categorically :-

        ” Do NOT invade MY boundaries”.

        That is precisely the message I want to emphasize. Do NOT invade the boundaries of Muslims , CHINA & Hindus.

        Feel free to have the entire flock of converted christians in India deported to your beloved america , Italy , Portugal , australia & uk. Harvest their organs & experiment on their bodies. SMOTHER them for Christ’s sake with your commpppppassion . Make them wear bikinis , g-strings whatever . They WILL oblige willingly. Almost all bollywood & kollywood bimbos also would oblige. PLEASE take them all from my Bharath.

        And leave us endangered Hindus & Muslims to sort out our differences & live in Peace under the leadership of CHINA.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 7:40 pm

          More unhinged ranting from “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi”:

          Why nobody is talking about aborted fetuses being added to pepsi & coke ?
          ……………………………………

          Perhaps because this does not happen? What fringe conspiracy site did this troll pull that one from?

          Ah–found it!

          http://www.naturalnews.com/049367_aborted_babies_flavor_chemicals_food_corporations.html

          Interesting–or perhaps not–that the source “Natural News” cites for this story is “Natural News”.

          Gee–I remember the “good old days”, where Muslims just claimed that Pepsi was an acronym for “Pay Every Penny to Save Israel”.

          More:

          Hindu God MaHaVishnu says ” Over actions alone you have choices. NOT over their Consequences “.
          ……………………………………

          An example of this in action is that “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” can post such tripe here, but has no control over our considering her deranged as a result.

          More:

          Do you know psychiatrists very successfully KILL people with their lithiums , tegretols , haloperidol etc.
          ……………………………………

          Perhaps this explains “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi’s” aversion to getting the psychiatric help she so desperately needs? Maybe, maybe not…

          Apparently this irrational poster hates the idea that lives can be saved through organ donation–but has no trouble with Muslims mass murdering people. Priorities…

          By the way, organ donation in the West is entirely voluntary, and it is up to the individual or the family if the individual’s wishes are not known. For myself, I have an organ donor sticker on my state I.D.–but no one is forced to donate organs.

          More:

          In India lot of young children who were reported missing were found to have been killed to cater to demands from fashion industry , medical fraternity with weird demands.
          The culprits did not receive death sentence. Lots of americans , british etc flew to India to hush up during that time.
          ……………………………………

          I’m not even sure what is implied here–that Americans enjoy somehow wearing children as a ‘fashion statement’? Who knows?

          More:

          Vaccine pushers like genetically modified terminator seeds pushers would always come up with wild statistics to carry out their agenda. How much of havoc has been caused by doctors ?
          ……………………………………

          How *dare* doctors and scientists save lives? Jihadis are fine, though…

          More:

          Whatever happened to freedom of choice ?

          ” Do NOT invade MY boundaries”.

          That is precisely the message I want to emphasize. Do NOT invade the boundaries of Muslims , CHINA & Hindus.
          ……………………………………

          So Muslims, Chinese, and Hindus all reject medical treatment and modern agriculture?

          More:

          Feel free to have the entire flock of converted christians in India deported to your beloved america , Italy , Portugal , australia & uk. Harvest their organs & experiment on their bodies. SMOTHER them for Christ’s sake with your commpppppassion . Make them wear bikinis , g-strings whatever .
          ……………………………………

          Like so many Muslim apologists, “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” appears to be unclear on the difference between having the right to wear–or read, or eat, or to study–something, and being forced to do so. This should not surprise.

          More:

          They WILL oblige willingly. Almost all bollywood & kollywood bimbos also would oblige. PLEASE take them all from my Bharath.
          ……………………………………

          Actually, most staff in Bollywood are Hindus–along with some Muslims–not Christians. This is *hardly* the most outlandish claim being made here, though…

          More:

          And leave us endangered Hindus & Muslims to sort out our differences & live in Peace under the leadership of CHINA.
          ……………………………………

          Here’s more on how Hindus live in peace with ravening Muslims:

          “Islamic State to India: ‘Either accept Islam, pay jizya or prepare to be slaughtered’”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/islamic-state-to-india-either-accept-islam-pay-jizya-or-prepare-to-be-slaughtered

          “India: Muslims torch cars and loot police station over Hindu ‘hate speech’”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/india-muslims-torch-cars-and-loot-police-station-over-hindu-hate-speech

          Best of luck with that…

    • Lalo Rivero says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 5:54 am

      John,

      I’ve lived and worked in Saudi – i can tell you from personal experience that there is a good reason for most Saudi women to cover their faces. Most of them are inbred – their parents, grandparents, great grandparents all first cousins. A typical Saudi has less than 50% the number of ancestors compared to Westerners… horrible birth defects, pinched narrow faces, bulging eyes, huge noses – 75% of all Saudis have inherited diabetes.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 10:21 am

        Lalo Rivero wrote:

        John,

        I’ve lived and worked in Saudi – i can tell you from personal experience that there is a good reason for most Saudi women to cover their faces. Most of them are inbred – their parents, grandparents, great grandparents all first cousins. A typical Saudi has less than 50% the number of ancestors compared to Westerners… horrible birth defects, pinched narrow faces, bulging eyes, huge noses – 75% of all Saudis have inherited diabetes.
        ……………………….

        Good God. Were it true that Saudi women cover their faces because they are inbred and (one presumes) ugly, then why wouldn’t the *men* cover their faces, as well?

        The fact is that Muslim women cover their faces so they won’t tempt out-of-control Muslim men–not because they are too hideous to be seen. Besides, looks are always relative–in a society where everyone is unattractive, some will always nonetheless be considered beauties.

        And here’s one of the Saudi Princesses–is *she* too hideous to be seen in public?

        https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tB8vP3XW_oM/hqdefault.jpg

        Besides, are we to believe that every Afghan woman immured in a Burqa is also too disfigured to be seen in polite company? This is obviously bullsh*t.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 10:26 am

          One more thing–are we to believe that a woman does not deserve to feel sunlight and air on her face if she isn’t pretty enough? Despite the absurd accusations of “body shaming”, the free West would never do that.

  2. vivienne Leijonhufvu (@goldaleijonhufv) says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:35 am

    A clever way to observe Islamic law. I do feel however there is too much pressure on women to look like under weight models nevertheless there is a severe over weight problem in the UK and in particular ROI. These over weights cost the NHS and other health services a great deal of money. This was never a problem up until the advent of fast food chains which includes Islamic take away food shops.

    • WVinMN says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 10:01 am

      Too bad! Let people make their own damn decisions concerning how they wish to live! And the best fix for the NHS is to ditch the NHS! The program’s financial problems have far more to do with an aging population, along with a growing number of bums who pay next to no taxes, than a “fat epidemic”.

      • vivienne Leijonhufvu (@goldaleijonhufv) says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 10:13 am

        Can’t disagree other than the last budget has increased taxes on high sugar products to reduce the number of unhealthily overweight British kids. You forget the high level of moslem immigrants coming into the UK and bringing with them contagious diseases both from North Africa and the rest of the middle east. The Brits should never have let Khan become mayor – this was achieved by an 80% vote of moslems and the rest Brits. This is why Europe needs to come out of Europe too many moslems are draining Europe of resources and services. Example 1 man x 4 wives = 20 kids. And if you saw the news last night the only man interviewed from Southampton Hospital who recently used the NHS one of his wives has just given birth to the 7th child. Back in the early ’70’s women with more than 3 kids at most were advised to go on the contraceptive pill in the maternity ward. I know I was there!

        • Demsci says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 1:54 pm

          “Example 1 man x 4 wives = 20 kids.”

          First my disclaimers: 1. I agree with your post on principle. 2. I abhor polygamy very much. 3. more kids per women by Muslima’s then kids per infidel women is regrettable.

          But we should focus on the number of kids PER WOMAN, not on the fathership of those kids. Polygamy does not increase the number of children per woman I think. For numerical outcomes it makes no difference if the 4 women were impregnated by 1, 2, 3 or 4 men.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 7:44 pm

          Demsci wrote:

          But we should focus on the number of kids PER WOMAN, not on the fathership of those kids. Polygamy does not increase the number of children per woman I think. For numerical outcomes it makes no difference if the 4 women were impregnated by 1, 2, 3 or 4 men.
          …………………………

          This would certainly be true, Demsci, but for one thing–the children of Muslim *fathers* are always considered Muslim, even if the mother is not.

          Hence, polygamy does specifically increase the Muslim population in those cases.

  3. Jura says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:37 am

    As far as I know marxists were allies of mullahs in the times of islamic revolution in Iran. For few weeks till their execution.

    • mortimer says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:18 am

      Soviets made an alliance with the Muslims until the Muslims began marrying 4 women each and creating an exponential birth rate. Then, the Soviets exiled all the Muslims to Siberia.

      • DFD says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:32 pm

        That’s a bit of an error, though, partially correct. However, the *caliphat* of Chechnia, governed by sharia, is located in the northern Caucasus, between the black sea and the Caspian sea. That is south eastern Europe, north of Georgia.

        It is a Russian Republic (?), at least officially, it’s president is also referred to as a caliph.

        Boy, wont ‘Christianblood’ be4 cheesed off about this.

        • DFD says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 1:35 pm

          PS: Sorry, forgot this link:

          http://www.themoscowtimes.com/upload/iblock/a9c/5571-08-pu_chechen13.jpg

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 9:18 pm

          Actually, “Christianblood” has defended Russia’s allowing Chechnya to become a Shari’ah state.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:16 pm

      True, Jura–the Communist Tudeh Party supported the “revolution” that ousted the Shah, then were shocked when the Mullahs turned on them as soon as they had consolidated their power.

      They savagely liquidated their former allies in the early ’80s. The book “Letters to My Torturer” by Houshang Asadi covers this. It is quite horrific.

      Houshang Asadi is in many ways an intelligent man–but he never really grasped how vicious Islam is, and remains clueless to this day. He only survived due to luck and because his wife tirelessly worked every personal contact she had–it was ultimately a random personal connection that saved him when so many others were murdered.

      They now live–where else?–here in the non-Communist, (largely) non-Muslim West.

  4. linnte says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:39 am

    It isn’t the JOB of a Mayor to decide body shaming is happening to women and girls. It is the job of the parent! Welcome Shari’a to London as predicted. Sadiq Khan just doesn’t want MUSLIM women who wear a Burqua knowing any freedom from summer heat exists. He does not want HIS children influenced. He wants CONTROL over women’s bodies and this is the start.

    • Nigel GFF says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 4:02 pm

      His job is now be to the ‘Arbiter of Decency’ is it? The ‘thin end of the wedge’ springs to mind.
      As you have correctly pointed out, it has nothing to do with ‘demeaning’ women but all to do with ‘stealth’ incursion of Sharia Law. I’m tempted to say, ‘how dare he’, but I won’t!
      Others have pointed out how demeaning it is women (young girls 4+) to be FORCED to don that garb.
      No choice is no choice at all.
      What a cheap creep he is. It’s “unrealistic” for me to run a 4 minute mile, but I still jog. Put simply, life is about ‘pressure’, self imposed goals are not a bad thing and pressure from life and others is unavoidable. All this half-baked, pseudo life-coaching, moral-philosophising is complete bul*shit. The goal is to establish a new town – ‘Londistan’.

    • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 11:36 am

      //job of the parent//

      Where are the parents ?? May I remind you presumptuous folks your think tank consisting of alan greenspans , max webers & various such blah blahs decreed there is nothing called society …all contractual relationships. Only individualism . That the state will take care of everything including parenting , social security health care education etc etc. That is how one american boy in Philadelphia “divorced” his own father & the court approved of such a decision.

      If responsible Parents are there their young daughters would not have ended up in orgy island of jeffrey epsteins servincing prince andrew of uk’s royal family , many DAVOS blokes & alleged elites. All MINOR Girls btw. This is allegedly illegal in your developpped america. So clever jeffrey epstein set up this orgy island elsewhere & his private jet is known as lolita express. So everything becomes LEGAL??
      Those minor girls were given 200 american dollars. And paedophile billionaire was made to enter something called “plea bargain”. That was ll. No punishment AT ALL.

      In India souls before being harvested are pampered so luxuriously. Unlike your own American young girls & boys with no parents but rotten state looking after them. In return evangelical MAFIA get entire State – Kerala , Tamil Nadu , Goa , entire North East,
      Karnataka , Andhra Pradesh all territories have been taken over by evangelical mafia.

      And america by heavy clapping & standing ovations have almost convinced Indian PM Modi to take up arms against CHINA. You cannot fool all the people all the time.

      I PRAY for CHINA’s VICTORY. Slaves of america-uk axis do not command my respect.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 17, 2016 at 8:02 pm

        More from “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi”:

        //job of the parent//

        Where are the parents ?? May I remind you presumptuous folks your think tank consisting of alan greenspans , max webers & various such blah blahs decreed there is nothing called society …all contractual relationships. Only individualism . That the state will take care of everything including parenting , social security health care education etc etc. That is how one american boy in Philadelphia “divorced” his own father & the court approved of such a decision.
        ………………………………

        This is a case from a little over a decade ago. Patrick Holland’s father murdered his mother, and is serving a lengthy sentence for his crime. The boy, 14 at the time, did not want to be compelled to see his mother’s killer and call him “father”.

        *This* wife-killer is what this troll considers a model parent. But, really, should that surprise coming from a Muslim apologist? “Honor Killing” of women is rife among Muslims.

        More:

        If responsible Parents are there their young daughters would not have ended up in orgy island of jeffrey epsteins servincing prince andrew of uk’s royal family , many DAVOS blokes & alleged elites. All MINOR Girls btw. This is allegedly illegal in your developpped america. So clever jeffrey epstein set up this orgy island elsewhere & his private jet is known as lolita express. So everything becomes LEGAL??
        ………………………………

        “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” appears not to have noticed that Jeffrey Epstein was arrested and convicted for his crime, and served his sentence, and is now a registered sex offender.

        In other words, sex with under-aged girls is *not* legal in the civilized West.

        Would that the same were true under Islam:

        “Pakistan: Bill banning child marriage fails after it’s deemed un-Islamic”

        https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/pakistan-bill-banning-child-marriage-fails-after-its-deemed-un-islamic

        In India souls before being harvested are pampered so luxuriously. Unlike your own American young girls & boys with no parents but rotten state looking after them. In return evangelical MAFIA get entire State – Kerala , Tamil Nadu , Goa , entire North East,
        Karnataka , Andhra Pradesh all territories have been taken over by evangelical mafia.
        ………………………………

        Christians are only 18% of the population in Kerala. The idea that this India state is Christian simply is not accurate at all.

        More:

        And america by heavy clapping & standing ovations have almost convinced Indian PM Modi to take up arms against CHINA. You cannot fool all the people all the time.

        I PRAY for CHINA’s VICTORY. Slaves of america-uk axis do not command my respect.
        ………………………………

        How bizarre. This unhinged poster appears to believe that China–of all places!–offers greater religious freedom than does India or the free West.

        But then, she also believes that those running Christian charities for children are a greater threat than homicidal Jihadists, so there you go…

  5. Islamorefugee says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:46 am

    This may be the beginning of what to expect .

    • Jay Boo says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:09 am

      On the plus side this will free up some space for Anti-jihad ads.

      • DFD says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 pm

        Only if you want to go to prison. Two years for just quoting Churchill on Islam…

        You know, that reminds me on a saying by Hegel, German philosopher, between 1770 and 1831, about. He said:

        “If you want to speak the truth, make sure you have a fast horse.”
        ==================================================

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 10:25 pm

        Brilliant, Jay Boo!

  6. Lawrence says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:48 am

    It’s more fundamental than that. What Liberalism and Islam have in common I mean. That is a shared hatred of the West and the Jews. It’s enough to override any differences. Clearly though the Left hates women, feminists themselves must hate women and everything associated with the feminine. That is a whole other thing, and I think quite complicated. Phyllis Chesler has written the definitive work on feminists’ selling their own gender under the bus, in the formers’ love affair with Islam.

    • vivienne Leijonhufvu (@goldaleijonhufv) says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:58 am

      We could take Paul Weston’s advice and initiate civil war sooner rather then later. But I have to say the bloody left wing Brits voted this creep in and now they have to deal with it.

      • mortimer says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 11:21 am

        No civil war, please. More free speech is required.

        Muslims should be encouraged to examine the veracity and morality of what they are told to believe.

        Islam is opportunistic and so is at odds with modernity, with objectivity, with transparency and with equality.

        If Islam cannot be reformed, Muslims should leave it.

        Reform Islam or leave it! That should be our slogan.

        • john spielman says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 1:17 pm

          I cannot imagine muslims reforming islam, as to do so would be to validate the point made by infidels – that ole muhammed WAS a demon possessed mass murderer thief liar misogynist and pedophile FALSE prophet!

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 10:28 am

          That could be *our* slogan, sure–but Muslims would not pay any attention to it.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 10:32 pm

      This is not Liberalism–it is the far Left, which is quite a different thing.

  7. Islamorefugee says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 10:01 am

    Britain to start with boycotting everyything islamic as protest, including their junk take away food to start with. Britain was healthy and creative enough without those and was able to build a world wide empire and give shape to the great Industrial Revolution that changed this world .

    • Lynette says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 3:50 am

      People remember for muslims the toilet paper is forbidden, So people who eat food prepared by muslims should remember their toilet hygiene! Hands and plain tap water only are used, so goodness knows what contaminations you are eating in the food you may eat. 200 odd people just recently eating in a restaurant got food poisoning and were in hospital. At least the cook was taken to court and was not allowed to carry on. Also think he had his restaurant closed down as well.

      • Bee says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 5:00 am

        Thank you for that. Most Brits don’t know that a vast number of so-called Indian restaurants are in fact run by Bangladeshis and Pakistanis, thereby muslimes are preparing that food. Always ask where someone is from when you enter such an establishment to avoid getting sick.

  8. Richard says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 10:26 am

    One certainty, is that we’ll never see the ‘sixties again … in addition the ruling is blatantly discriminatory, as some would say.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:02 am

      When British legislators strictly follow Islamic Shariat, that’s not discriminatory and that’s not discrimination.

  9. WorkingClassPost says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 10:27 am

    I’m prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on this, given that many people are unhappy with the amount of gratuitous skin used in advertising.

    But this could already be his second strike.

    Of more concern to me is the removal of CCTV from London’s West End.

    http://primaryaccount.blogspot.co.uk/

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:01 am

      London’s first Muslim Mayor Sadiq Aman Khan’s biggest problem is his manhood is intensely aroused just by the photos and advertisements of non-Muslim females!

      So, when British females will cover themselves according to Islamic Shariat, London’s first Muslim mayor believes his manhood will not be aroused anymore.

      • WorkingClassPost says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 11:33 am

        Possibly arousal, too.

        But the he word he used was ‘shame’, though he should understand that shame, like beauty, resides in the eye of the beholder.

        • mortimer says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 11:41 am

          Benny Hill’s character on TV was attracted to the plumper girls!

    • Ted Tyler says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 5:08 am

      Note to All: The blog of WorkingClassPost has a huge amount of important information in a very small space. Check it out.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 12:28 pm

        You want me to provide links & references. Edward Snowden told the truth how everything happening around is KNOWN to powers that be also called deep state.

        Your request is odd as I am not the one sowing terrorism but christian mafia. Dollars are being printed in ABUNDANCE in your america & sent to indian agents ( most of them are hindus like sagarika ghose , rajdeep sardesai the media scum & many NGOs are there funded by rockefeller , ford foundation etc etc.

        If you are that serious why not ask your own government folks who are the perpetrators?

        When you say without links & references what I write is of no value to you , that is PERFECTLY alright with me. That does not perturb me at all.

        Your own alan greenspan has failed you miserably & is continuing to exist & nobody is bothered. I know MONEY is GOD for americans , uk , australians & your CEOs. This bankruptcy should unnerve you. Not lack of references from me. your beloved america is heavily HEAVILY in DEBT.

        Watch Hollywood movie ‘Inside Job’ . Full of interviews with real CULPABLE guilty CEOs & wall street bankers . None of your presidents be it republican or democrat can do anything. They are the ones under the total control of THIEVES in the guise of CEOs. Your presidents suited & booted can do nothing but “recapitalize” . I do not know what these empty VAIN words mean. Ask your presidents.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 2:49 pm

          Let me give you an example. Recently, Bishop Lynch in Florida USA made some statements that on the surface seemed ludicrous. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/florida-bishop-blames-orlando-jihadist-massacre-on-catholic-contempt-for-homosexuality
          Many people on Jihad Watch commented on this post by Christine Williams. But did he really say what they said he said? Well, one could search around through the post and find a link to see exactly what he did say. Then you could determine – first hand – that the Bishop was indeed seriously challenged by reality.
          Speaking for myself now I will say that I will not consider your posts seriously unless you couple them with some credible references. I cannot accept what you say on face value – although what you say may be true to some degree. With the huge amount of information coming in every day I don’t have the time for that. My time could better be spent with books by Robert Spencer, Bill Warner or Christopher Hitchens.

  10. Been There Got the Tee Shirt says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 10:50 am

    Who does this mayor guy think he is? I guess he must have a pen and a phone too, that qualifies him to be a little mini-dictator/despot. I would be inclined to find a large van with a pretty graphic to park in front of his house, and to cruise the streets of London.

    Next will be a ban on pork in London because the smell disturbs the sensitivities of various groups. Then a ban on church bells that disturb the peace. Then working on Fridays, shifting to a Sunday-through-Thursday work week by closing all the buildings that are owned by sharia banks, like the government office buildings.

    Hey, you will no longer have to travel to the middle east to experience the middle eastern culture. A trip to London will do nicely.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:09 am

      No, London’s first Muslim mayor’s most potent weapon is his Islamic ideology that attracts British people the most.

      From the colonial time to this day, British govt. shows a strong preference — above others — for the ideology of Islam in general and faithful Muslims in particular.

      • WorkingClassPost says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 11:36 am

        They like islam because within it they see a compliant and submissive population.

        Also a stupid one that asks no questions.

  11. Tommy says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 10:51 am

    Moochelle Otrauma is doing sharia diets, and b Insane Otrauma is doing sharia sex….batroom-school-bill and he wants sex-ed in kindergarden-as the “right thing to do”

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:04 am

      Our current Muslim president will probably divorce Mee-Shaal after leaving the White House!

  12. mortimer says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:15 am

    Sharia law imposed under another name.

    The thin edge of the wedge.

    Britons will rebel!

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:17 am

      Mortimer says: Britons will rebel!

      That’s no gonna happen; Britons love Islam.

  13. Jay Boo says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:16 am

    Rape infidel girls — its Islamic

    The mayor has no problem with Muslim rape gangs demeaning little infidel girls.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:27 am

      Absolutely true and absolutely correct.

      London’s first Muslim mayor doesn’t complain about or doesn’t want to change the Iranian Islamic custom of savagely stoning Muslim females — with broken pieces of bricks — to death, which is also occurring in London’s first Muslim mayor’s home-country Pakistan.

      But, London’s first Muslim mayor wants to change the Western Christian females!

      London’s first Muslim mayor wants Western Christian females to believe in the ideology of Islam.

      London’s first Muslim mayor wants Western Christian females to practice soon’Nah.

      London’s first Muslim mayor doesn’t complain about female sex-slaves kept by pious Muslim men in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:15 pm

        Trust the vested interests to distort facts where Muslims are concerned.

        Recall the case of an Iranian woman who was given the death sentence ? It is anti ISLAM media that eclipsed all relevant facts & started feeding canards on how (sic) “barbaric” Iran is.
        It so happened I came to know she a married woman had plotted with her paramour & killed her husband in the most gruesome way. By tying him up & electrocuting him to death. The death sentence was commensurate with her crime. Yet , the western anti MUSLIM world screamed so much & manipulated Justice that Iran commuted that sentence. I do not know what happened afterwards.

        This unwarranted tinkering in every sovereign nation around by developppped christian countries like America , UK , Australia is the root cause of a lot of problems America faces today.

        Similar were the high decibel noises made over one rape that happened in India recently. A movie was made by bbc team without taking the permission of BJP Government. And Hollywood’s Mery Streep wailed she “could not sleep the whole night”. Hillary Clintons also made a lot of anti Hindu noises. Only ONE English reporter wrote about Steubenville dehumanizing gang RAPE of a young sixteen year old girl in America by a gang of high school football team boys. The Police refused to register the case. This RAPE in America had taken place before the rape in India. Meryl Streep did not get insomnia.

        Muslims are NOT as bad as portrayed by many. I know in some core issues Hindus have some difficulties with them. However the menacing threats posed by evangelical mafia worldwide particularly in India is the most formidable of all. Muslims are HONOURABLE. They retain their Muslim names. However christians are given free white goods , money , admission in colleges , schools etc ( all educational institutions in India are under the brutal monopoly of christians…as the british colonizers decreed so & it is the british dictated constitution that is being followed till date in India ) to convert & many retain original Hindu names who are all crypto christians or a bizarre combination like say solomon paappaiya , daniel prakash , samuel rajasekara reddy , jennifer arul , sanjay pinto & the TERRORISM unleashed by them cannot be captured in words by ANYONE.

        Vast areas WITHIN India have long come under the stranglehold of christian mafia. Idiotic India to appease anti CHINA america & uk makes needless noises about Chinese “incursions”. India is greedy for weapons from America as it is salivating for sooooperpower status in Asia. Hence does not challenge the lies being spread about China & ISLAM by developppped anglo saxon countries like america & uk.

        It so happened only this morning I happened to read about one american paedophile billionaire called jeffrey epstein notorious for EGREGIOUS CRIMES but enjoying the protection from authorities including FBI. Pitted against him Afghani Omar Mateen emerges NOBLE & GOOD.

        Why do you have such gross double standards ? Those who have watched ‘Leaving Las Vegas ‘ movie know how kind & commmmmmppassionate americans are towards women. When you point your index finger at Muslims with such a holier than thou attitude do not forget rest of your fingers are pointed towards you.

        In India almost all christian criminals receive no punishment whatsoever. So many converted christians who are employed as teachers , principals in convents are mostly serial rapists. But enjoy protection from evangelical mafia. With such a track record periodically america pontificates to Hindus in India to “ensure religious freedom for christians”.

        Only Muslims like Afzal Guru & Kasab have been UNJUSTLY hanged. Christians are beyond punishment & beyond scrutiny in pusillanimous india.

        • Face_The_Truth says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 1:37 pm

          Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says:
          “Only Muslims like Afzal Guru & Kasab have been UNJUSTLY hanged.”

          Are you out of mind or mind of out???

        • WorkingClassPost says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 2:13 pm

          If what you say is only half true, then Christians are treated better in India than in ‘Christian’ countries.

          So please excuse my scepticism.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 11:38 pm

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

          Trust the vested interests to distort facts where Muslims are concerned.

          Recall the case of an Iranian woman who was given the death sentence ? It is anti ISLAM media that eclipsed all relevant facts
          ……………………………..

          Iran regularly hangs gay people and stones women to death. How *dare* Infidels consider this barbaric?

          “Iran’s human rights chief: We are proud of stoning”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/irans-human-rights-chief-we-are-proud-of-stoning

          More:

          This unwarranted tinkering in every sovereign nation around by developppped (sic) christian countries like America , UK , Australia is the root cause of a lot of problems America faces today.
          ……………………………..

          Well, of course! How dare we consider Muslims mass-murdering their victims at Christmas parties and nightclubs to be bad things?

          More:

          Similar were the high decibel noises made over one rape that happened in India recently.
          ……………………………..

          Of course “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” is upset about this–in Islam rape is Halal.

          More:

          Only ONE English reporter wrote about Steubenville dehumanizing gang RAPE of a young sixteen year old girl in America by a gang of high school football team boys. The Police refused to register the case…
          ……………………………..

          What *absolute rot*. Not only was this case investigated by the police, but there were numerous convictions. This case was widely reported.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steubenville_High_School_rape_case

          How can “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” pretend this is not the case? Moreover, this incident was widely condemned. Rape is not condemned in Islam.

          More:

          Muslims are NOT as bad as portrayed by many. I know in some core issues Hindus have some difficulties with them.
          ……………………………..

          Might that be because Muslims are always murdering them?

          More:

          However the menacing threats posed by evangelical mafia worldwide particularly in India is the most formidable of all…
          ……………………………..

          Uh huh. Muslims regularly mass murder people–what violence has been committed by the “evangelical mafia”? What crap.

          More:

          Muslims are HONOURABLE. They retain their Muslim names.
          ……………………………..

          What could possibly be more “HONORABLE” than mass murder? But this is not an issue, apparently, compared to the “honor” of their retaining Muslim names.

          More:

          However christians are given free white goods , money , admission in colleges , schools etc ( all educational institutions in India are under the brutal monopoly of christians…
          ……………………………..

          What claptrap. Firstly, non-Christians attend Christian-run schools in India all the time. Then, the idea that non-Christians are somehow prevented from founding schools in India is simply laughable.

          More:

          as the british colonizers decreed so & it is the british dictated constitution that is being followed till date in India ) to convert & many retain original Hindu names who are all crypto christians or a bizarre combination like say solomon paappaiya , daniel prakash , samuel rajasekara reddy , jennifer arul , sanjay pinto & the TERRORISM unleashed by them cannot be captured in words by ANYONE.
          ……………………………..

          So adopting a name that is partially Hindu and partially Christian is now “terrorism”? But the Mumbai attacks, I suppose, were not…

          More:

          Vast areas WITHIN India have long come under the stranglehold of christian mafia. Idiotic India to appease anti CHINA america & uk makes needless noises about Chinese “incursions”. India is greedy for weapons from America as it is salivating for sooooperpower status in Asia. Hence does not challenge the lies being spread about China & ISLAM by developppped (sic) anglo saxon countries like america & uk.
          ……………………………..

          Isn’t is odd how much this “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” hates India? You might almost suppose she is Muslim? Nah–couldn’t be…sarc/off

          More:

          It so happened only this morning I happened to read about one american paedophile billionaire called jeffrey epstein notorious for EGREGIOUS CRIMES but enjoying the protection from authorities including FBI. Pitted against him Afghani Omar Mateen emerges NOBLE & GOOD.
          ……………………………..

          Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of having had sex with a teen-aged girl.
          He was convicted for it, served time, and is now a registered sex offender.

          Ugly stuff, no doubt–but worse than massacring 49 people and wounding as many more? *This* is what this poster deems “NOBLE & GOOD”.

          Moreover, you might get the idea from this that Islam condemns sex with under-aged girls–in fact, *nothing* could be further from the truth.

          In fact, forced child marriage is *rife* in Islam, on the model of the “Prophet’s” rape of little nine-year-old Aisha.

          More:

          Why do you have such gross double standards ? Those who have watched ‘Leaving Las Vegas ‘ movie know how kind & commmmmmppassionate americans are towards women. When you point your index finger at Muslims with such a holier than thou attitude do not forget rest of your fingers are pointed towards you.
          ……………………………..

          Is this poster unaware that “Leaving Las Vegas” is a movie, and that moreover the behavior of the abusive characters is presented as *anything* but ideal?

          This must be too subtle for “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” to grasp…

          More:

          In India almost all christian criminals receive no punishment whatsoever. So many converted christians who are employed as teachers , principals in convents are mostly serial rapists.
          ……………………………..

          What absolute crap.

          More:

          But enjoy protection from evangelical mafia. With such a track record periodically america pontificates to Hindus in India to “ensure religious freedom for christians”.
          ……………………………..

          There certainly is no religious freedom under Islam–for Christians or Hindus or any other “filthy Infidels”.

          More:

          Only Muslims like Afzal Guru & Kasab have been UNJUSTLY hanged. Christians are beyond punishment & beyond scrutiny in pusillanimous india.
          ……………………………..

          So–conviction for Jihad terror is “unjust”? Apparently trying to murder Indian Ministers and MPs and is just fine.

          Also fine are the Mumbai terror attacks, where Jihadists slaughtered 164 victims.

          Really, given this post, what are the chances that “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” is Hindu–and not a Mohammedan?

        • linnte says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 9:06 am

          Graven, the Stubenville rape case has a Ma’lik Henderson as one of the rapists. Isn’t Ma’lik a Muslim name? I wonder if it is possible that that could have something to do with his eagerness to rape that girl? A deeper look into that case may reveal more Islamic influence from his family or Mosque? Just a thought. Four years ago this happened. Way before the public has become conscious of the rape culture Islam creates.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 7:33 am

          Janikir,

          We all have “confirmation bias” whereby we accept as true the data that is in conformity to what we already believe and reject data that contradicts our beliefs. When we were young, we would accept the ideas that were given to us by our parents – so our beliefs are mainly determined by the beliefs of our parents and our culture. So what is really true? Perhaps what is really true is that truth itself is elusive and hard to find.

          When I first looked at Jihad watch articles I thought that some of the ideas presented could not possibly be true – so I checked out various references to find that the articles were confirmed by the various references. This does not prove truth – but it does provide a degree in internal consistency – which is a good thing.

          There are a few people of this site who would censor any posts that say anything bad about Christianity. To do that they use the catchy phrase “This is Jihad Watch – not Christianity Watch”. However, Robert Spencer has assured me that Jihad Watch is NOT a Christian Website and therefore anti-Christian posts will not be censored or deleted. You will always get flak from Christian fundamentalists whose thinking is based mainly on emotion and these posts are best ignored. They provide no information.

          Your post is interesting and thought provoking; however, it its present form, it is of no value to us. This is because you have not provided any references to back up what you say. You should go back to your post, and take, say, 1/4 of the ideas you have submitted, provide them with credible references, and re-submit the post.

          Be aware that at this point I agree with the question posed by Face_the_Truth – namely “Are you out of your mind?” and the dissection of your post by Gravenimage. So prove me wrong.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:53 pm

          linnte wrote:

          Graven, the Stubenville rape case has a Ma’lik Henderson as one of the rapists. Isn’t Ma’lik a Muslim name?
          …………………………….

          Good point, Linnte–and one I had not thought of.

          I had thought of his name being “black”– but clearly its roots are Muslim. I have been unable to find any information as to whether he is Muslim, or whether his family is.

          Still, it *does* seem quite possible.

          (One very small point–his name is Ma’lik Richmond; he attended East Henderson High School).

  14. Jay Boo says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:23 am

    The young white British girls screamed out in agony.

    Cameron and the Left shouted back,
    “SHUT UP,— you girls are embarrassing us in front of Muslims”

  15. mortimer says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:40 am

    London voters have badly miscalculated this evil opportunist.

    • Pong says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 5:07 am

      No, they didn’t. He is an anti-semite, so they have something in common.
      To be against islam is to take sides with Israel and the jews. For majority of brits it is better to be in alliance with a pakistany moslem, then with the jews.

      • DFD says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 8:07 am

        Have you ever been near Britain? I doubt it…

  16. Troybeam says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:47 am

    So it begins the full implementing of sharia law on non Muslims, goodbye England.

  17. Mubarak says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:51 am

    One wonders why the commercializers and the young women in the commercial are so prudish? We could comfortably be without the small pieces of cloth on the body exposed here, and it might even persuade some potential customers to buy what the girl has lost, if she has not already sold it i.e.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 12:12 pm

      You must be a follower of the world’s most peaceful ideology of Islam.

    • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 2:40 pm

      Good one !

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 11:42 pm

        Of course “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi”–who above condones the Mumbai terror attacks–considers this a “good one”. *Ugh*.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 7:45 am

          Btw , you need not scream so loud to prove you are holier than the pope & more loyal than the ruler . Save your christian concern for your own fellow americans.

          You know nothing at all about what has been happening in India but have the audacious temerity to type “what crap”. If you are that lachrymose what prevents you folks from whisking all converted christians , crypto christians , stealth christians from India to your own america , uk , australia ?? Lots of churches are lying desolate I hear in christian countries & you need not cause global warming by buying so much of aviation fuel from ARABS extorting everything from them at cheaper rates ( in petrodollars when the whole world knows developpppped sooooper power america is ssso heavily in debt…recklessly stealing all the SAVINGS of Indians , Japanese , Chinese , Germans , Arabs calling it ‘borrowing , investments in treasury bonds of america ‘ & is such a pauper CANNOT repay anything ) to carry cartons of bibles , NGOs of rockefeller foundation , ford foundation to evangelize erect churches thus GOBBLING up LAND with its resources therein. All those converted christians in Pakistan , India etc can be comfortably accommodated in churches in america , uk , australia etc . Educate , uplift & empower them. In YOUR america.

          Hindus’ burden would get lightened considerably.

          I am not surprised you folks are arguing with Mubarak justifying debauchery calling it individual freedom yada yada. christian papacy is so notorious for worldwide RAPES & SODOMIES. No punishment for them. All that the pope says ” Jesus is weeping for you up above “. Highly advanced scientific technologically sooooooperior america & uk accept this answer HAPPILY.

          If you christians are allegedly facing problems why bother ? When Jesus Christ is weeping for you up above you should sleep peacefully. Not wage wars & impose sanctions.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 11:54 am

          I am APPALLED at your abysmal ignorance. I know ‘Leaving Las Vegas’ is a movie. BUT it is based entirely on a true story. You sit in your developppppped sooooperpower country pounding away as though you have travelled all over Egypt , Iraq, Iran , Morocco , Saudi Arabia , India , Pakistan & even time travel talking & talking about Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) & what all happened.

          Highly odious. Someone else here asks me to give links & references. I am no think tank mercifully. karl marx NEVER ever visited MY country Bharath but wrote lot of CRAP calling us (sic) “barbarians”. Max Weber the protestant christian who shaped america wrote he made intense studies of religions of India & China calling them (sic) “inferior…not conducive to progress …growth”.

          By default such writers have relieved me of the compulsion to provide references , links blah blah. Do remember Bharath EXISTED much before your americaAAAA came into being.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 1:28 pm

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

          Btw , you need not scream so loud to prove you are holier than the pope & more loyal than the ruler .
          ……………………………………

          Opposing bloody Jihad terror in India does not make me “holy”–it just makes me a compassionate human being.

          More:

          All those converted christians in Pakistan , India etc can be comfortably accommodated in churches in america , uk , australia etc . Educate , uplift & empower them. In YOUR america.
          ……………………………………

          Christians *are* at threat in Pakistan from violent, supremacist Muslims–as are Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and any other non-Muslims.

          Why would you gloat over that?

          More:

          Hindus’ burden would get lightened considerably.
          ……………………………………

          If they could flee Pakistan and Bangladesh, this would be true. The presence of Christians in India, though, does not present a violent threat–despite your claims to the contrary.

          More:

          I am not surprised you folks are arguing with Mubarak justifying debauchery calling it individual freedom yada yada. christian papacy is so notorious for worldwide RAPES & SODOMIES. No punishment for them.
          ……………………………………

          Mubarak has many times justified Muslim rape of Infidels in the West due to our (supposed) debauchery, which to his mind include allowing women to attend public New Year’s Eve celebrations.

          Appalling–but scarcely surprising–that you would defend that.

          You appear to be unaware that rape is *illegal* in the West–not so in Dar-al-Islam if the victims are Infidels.

          More:

          If you christians are allegedly facing problems why bother ? When Jesus Christ is weeping for you up above you should sleep peacefully. Not wage wars & impose sanctions.
          ……………………………………

          Where to start? Firstly, this is the usual–the claim that if Christians are real Christians that they should not be allowed to defend against violent Jihad at all, but should just roll over for any Muslim savagery.

          Secondly, your idea that everyone at Jihad Watch is Christian is simply bizarre. There are Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, neo-Pagans, Wiccans, Agnostics, and Atheists here, who all oppose violent Jihad.

          More:

          I am APPALLED at your abysmal ignorance. I know ‘Leaving Las Vegas’ is a movie. BUT it is based entirely on a true story.
          ……………………………………

          No, it’s not. Author John O’Brien wrote “Leaving Las Vegas” as a novel. He did not drink himself to death in Las Vegas, and the prostitute character Sera and the violence against her are all fictional.

          O’Brien based the story on some of his own demons–he did later commit suicide himself–but the idea that “Leaving Las Vegas” is “based entirely on a true story” is, like so many of your assertions, quite false.

          More:

          . You sit in your developppppped sooooperpower country pounding away as though you have travelled all over Egypt , Iraq, Iran , Morocco , Saudi Arabia , India , Pakistan & even time travel talking & talking about Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) & what all happened.
          ……………………………………

          Not at all. Certainly, the “Prophet” Muhammed may not have even existed historically. But speaking about Muhammed based on his portrayal in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira is based entirely on *Muslim* sources–and they present a grim picture of a warlord, caravan-raider, rapist, slaver, and mass murderer.

          Of course, Muslims do not believe that any “filthy Kuffar” has the right to speak critically of this baleful figure. As a proud Infidel, though, I reject these Muslim strictures.

          And what have I said regarding Dar-al-Islam that is incorrect? I notice you cannot name an actual point.

          More:

          Highly odious. Someone else here asks me to give links & references. I am no think tank mercifully.
          ……………………………………

          In other words, like most Mohammedans, you do not want to reason or provide proof for any of your assertions. Duly noted.

          And saying you are “no think tank” is, of course, something on which we can finally agree.

          More:

          karl marx NEVER ever visited MY country Bharath but wrote lot of CRAP calling us (sic) “barbarians”. Max Weber the protestant christian who shaped america wrote he made intense studies of religions of India & China calling them (sic) “inferior…not conducive to progress …growth”.

          By default such writers have relieved me of the compulsion to provide references , links blah blah. Do remember Bharath EXISTED much before your americaAAAA came into being.
          ……………………………………

          The existence of other writers means that you do not have to back up any of your assertions with facts? That India existed before the United States (somehow) does the same?

          Muslims really do reject rationality.

        • Champ says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 3:08 pm

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

          karl marx NEVER ever visited MY country Bharath but wrote lot of CRAP calling us (sic) “barbarians”.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          “Barbarians”? Unimaginable!

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:41 pm

      The vile Mubarak wrote:

      One wonders why the commercializers and the young women in the commercial are so prudish? We could comfortably be without the small pieces of cloth on the body exposed here, and it might even persuade some potential customers to buy what the girl has lost, if she has not already sold it i.e.
      ……………………………

      The vicious Mubarak has pushed this before–that women in the West deserve to be raped by Muslims because of Victoria Secret ads.

      And note the idea that if a woman chooses to pose in a bikini that she must be a “prostitute”.

      • Marty says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 5:23 am

        The most shameful event in recent UK political history was the election of
        a mohammedan to one of the handful of genuinely powerful political posts
        left in the UK.
        Islam is the sworn enemy of all that is decent & humane, & thanks to
        their incontinent breeding habits (including government recognised polygamy),
        these third worlders are taking over.
        The wretched London Mayor addressed a meeting yesterday where the men sat
        at the front & the women sat at the back.
        The US, like France, is a secular state, which sounds fine.
        But it is not fine if politicians think islam is “just another religion”.
        In the UK, I guarantee, if any US group of white religious cultists with views
        lidentical to islam tried to set up shop, they’d be banned & deported.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 2:15 pm

          Yes, Marty–that Britons elected a Muslim mayor of their greatest city is utter madness.

  18. Angemon says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:02 pm

    I can’t chalk this one to sharia. The push to remove ads with fit females was in the making long before Khan was elected. It’s all about pleasing rabid land-whales who are enraged over female beauty – why, why can’t other women be disgusting slobs as well? Unfair! UNFAIR!!!!!

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      That’s a very arousing photo!!!

      Jihad Watch website owners must start censorship now.

      • PRCS says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 4:31 pm

        Wait, wait!

        Not just yet, please.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:08 am

          LMAO, PRCS! ?

    • Donna says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 12:28 pm

      Really? That’s sad if true, I would think these ads would HELP them to face that about themselves then. I’m a fit woman in my 50s and have no problem at all with this ad. What REALLY disturbs me is once a woman is no longer of “child bearing” age Islam seems to think she no longer has value – now THAT I have experienced. From what I’ve observed, Islam calls their own women “dogs” after a certain age, and they are considered disposable. To go to the extreme, I’m implying eldercide is being committed by Islam, on top of their other atrocities. Correct me if my assumptions are wrong.

      • Face_The_Truth says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:16 pm

        Well…if you’re in your 50’s, but still appear like you’re in your 30’s and you do not cover your body fully from the lustful eyes of men, Muslim men might be aroused by your uncovered skin…

        Just think about Pamela Geller who doesn’t cover her skin and Muslim men find that quite offensive to Islam.

        • Donna says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 1:27 pm

          I dress for the weather Face_the_Truth, not to comply with any religion, and yes that includes the beach.
          btw – how did you see my image, I’ve never posted it, but thanks for the compliment 🙂

      • c matt says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 4:31 pm

        Shaming has a purpose, and everyone uses it to different ends. The Muslim Mayor himself is using shaming by criticizing the advertiser for using attractive models. “Body shaming” just might make a lard-butt lose a few pounds, improving her health. If seeing attractive women makes you feel bad about yourself, then the problem is with you, not them. Lose a few pounds or accept where you are and moveon.org.

        • Donna says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 4:44 pm

          @c matt : You ever hear the saying “give them an inch they’ll take a mile”? I’ve observed one of Islam’s most popular forms of “entertainment” is slut-shaming, and they take it to an extreme. Just the fact this woman is not covered makes her a “slut” in their eyes, as we’ve seen evidenced here by comments from other posters mentioning she must be a prostitute, which is pretty ridiculous to jump to that conclusion IMO.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:01 pm

          Tsk , tsk , tak……I have heard such asinine arguments many times.

          Slim & trim bodies have their own limitations. Do you know atkins who boasted to all about his cholesterol , triglycerides , BP , creatinine & various blahs blahs being absolutely PERFECT & vainly sporting a slim body died while skiing breaking his skull ? Slim & trim bodies often encase brainless numb & dumb skulls.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 1:35 pm

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi wrote:

          Do you know atkins who boasted to all about his cholesterol , triglycerides , BP , creatinine & various blahs blahs being absolutely PERFECT & vainly sporting a slim body died while skiing breaking his skull ?
          …………………………

          Actually, no. Dr. Atkins died after a fall outside his New York clinic on a slippery walk.

          This is wildly off-topic, in any case, but just shows once again how fact-challenged this poster is.

    • Ted Tyler says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 1:23 pm

      My wife is 68, has a few wrinkles, but has a figure close to that of the Protein world model. As a child, she was fat and “was the last one chosen at playground”. She went on a fitness kick and now we both do an average of one 5K road race per week. We cut down on sugar, salt and fat and minimize animal products in favor of plant products. Only a few of us are screwed by our genes. Most fat people and people with Type II Diabetes can benefit from a healthy diet and exercise.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 1:36 pm

        Good for you guys, Ted!

        Not everyone is “shamed” by such pictures as the one in the ad–some are inspired by them.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 11:44 pm

      Angemon, Muslims are happy to pretend to adopt poses in the West if it further enables Shari’ah law.

      • Angemon says

        Jun 20, 2016 at 10:49 am

        I’m aware of that, GI. But I suspect that this ban would have been placed regardless of who was ellected in the last ellections. Page 3 girls were dropped because sexism. The Athena tennis girl poster same thing. It was only a matter of time.

  19. mortimer says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:15 pm

    STEALTH JIHAD.

  20. Max Publius says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:19 pm

    How does this square with the “Free the Nipple” hard left feminists? Is there going to be a burka with two holes cut out in the chest area?

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 12:22 pm

      Feminists believe that Islam — from the beginning — has protected women and girls from the lustful eyes of men.

  21. Face_The_Truth says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:27 pm

    Muslim mayor of London will probably murder his daughters and his wife as an honor to his Islamic family tradition.

  22. Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:34 pm

    Let us not find a ghost behind every post. Whatever Sadiq Khan says has long been the demand by lots of womenfolk in India also. I am sure many women Hindus included would welcome this. The obsession with size zero , barbie doll figures made many become anorexic. This was termed eating disorder & psychiatrists the most avaricious drug pushers benefitted immensely.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 1:03 pm

      Well…London’s mayor is not actually objecting over the ugliness or unhealthiness of anorexic girls.

      Pakistanian Muslim mayor of London wants “Parda” of Islam to be institutionalized in London.

      No doubt, there are millions of Indian females who become very fat and their husbands still love them and adore them in spite of their becoming fat by eating more and working-out less.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 1:38 pm

        There are many reasons for one getting fat.

        Since you presumptuously mention ” eating more & working out less” may I remind you that in India toooooooooo many churches have proliferated in every nook , every corner , every crevice that fat people have no place to walk.

        • Donna says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 pm

          So I guess when they sit around the church they really are “sitting around the church” hahahahaha
          🙂

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 pm

          Christianophobe “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

          may I remind you that in India toooooooooo many churches have proliferated in every nook , every corner , every crevice that fat people have no place to walk.
          …………………..

          Does “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” realize how stupid this is?

  23. Max Publius says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 12:36 pm

    A mendacious religious bigot following a system that inherently hates the Other is the last person native ethnic Brits need reforming their morals. This is the patronizing colonial pattern repeated in reverse and with far less grounds. He’s promoting the retrograde sharia-compliant morals of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, not liberal principles of human rights.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 1:05 pm

      You’re absolutely correct.

      Disclaimer: No sarcasm in this post.

  24. Georg says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    Baha. Islamists paint themselves as progressive feminists as neolibs concur without missing a beat. It all goes straight to hell before our eyes. Right up there with killing gays out of sympathy for them. What a farce. How long can a society which criminalizes logic remain?

  25. Westman says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 3:01 pm

    The Imam will tend his sheep,
    The valley will BOOM again,
    And Jimmy will go for prayer,
    To recite his Shahada there.

  26. Champ says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    The incremental steps have begun …from bikinis to burqas ain’t it grand!

  27. Hope says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 3:17 pm

    Crafty. Sneaky. Mr. Kahn is already on his way to establishing sharia law after only a short time in office. Disguising censorship and restriction of expression as something beneficial to women. How stupid can Londoners be? Muslims must simply marvel at how easy this takeover of the West has been. Like taking candy from a baby.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 3:27 pm

      Not only that.

      Mr. Khan has the burning ambition to become Prime Minister of Great Britain…

    • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 6:10 pm

      Overwrought imaginations betraying your needless animosity towards Islam.

      What about britain’s track record ? They colonized the entire world . Inquisition by Portugese christian missionaries etc cannot be obliterated by denials. Even today lots of countries are referred to as commonwealth countries expected to pay obeisance to britain’s royal family. Mr.Khan is a citizen of UK. God willing , if becomes Prime Minister of Britain what is there to complain ? It would be a victory for democracy. Have you people not been busy exporting democracy , democracy all over the world undergoing undue exertions in upliftment & upliftments of all non christians of this world ? Did you not bring lots of vaccines & aid agencies preceded by manufacturing many non existent diseases surreptitiously depopulating many , planting the cross & harvesting souls ?? The junk exported by you like burgers , kentucky fried chicken , pizzas , carbonated pepsi & coca cola have become the staple of many guileless people including ARABS. Not to forget genetically modified seeds & crops. India is also a heavy casualty. alan greenspan , max weber , karl marx have succeeded in uprooting the very FAMILY in your countries promoting mindless individualism , reckless economy , irresponsible consumerism & credit card mania . Not just that. This chaos manufactured by alan greenspans & max webers got GLOBALIZED infecting rest of the countries.

      If some SANE people want to crack the whip on debauchery SANE people would be welcoming such moves. I have been living in an Islamic country for some years . Their governance is EXCELLENT. Women are quite safe . Not what you people exaggerate. And there are PLENTY of Hindu expats living in many Islamic countries & they are NOT complaining. Hindus also have an extensive Dharmic code of conduct. Whatever they prescribe for womenfolk including dress code is almost similar to what Islam decrees. Why whip up so much of hatred towards Muslims ?

      I get it. You want only christians to lord over others. Many of us do NOT want that.

      • No Fear says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 6:36 pm

        So, your solution to all these problems is to follow the demented rantings of a man who killed Jews, Christians and Pagans, a man who showed his absolute contempt for those who refused to submit to him. Many of your points are valid but your solution is appalling. Mohammed was a vile personality as attested by the Hadith and the Quran.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 7:31 pm

          You admit many of my points are valid. Let us stop there. Why do you presume I want to discuss Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) ? In India it is overwhelmingly hindus calling themselves seculars , marxists – there are too many political factions dmk of Tamil Nadu being one of them a staunch ally of congress party who are all evangelicals’ footsoldiers furthering christian agenda of usurping Temples by planting cross (plural crosses) overnight & hurriedly converting them into churches . They have been coming up with unprintable blasphemous material on Hindu Gods & Goddesses distributing to the masses & unleashing lots of riots including rapes & LOOT. Media calls them “caste wars”. That is an outrageous lie. It is the christian mafia that instigates maximum terrorism in India. You must be aware of lots of Consecrated Icons from Hindus’ Temples stolen by certain hindus that landed up in America , Germany , Australia , uk . Not a Single Icon was stolen so unscrupulously by MUSLIMS & China.

          Hence most Hindus fear christians. Not Muslims. Our elected representatives dance to the tune of christian mafia. Whatever we are taught in our schools & colleges are all unduly biased against Hindus portraying christians as angels. Christian Inquisitions & large scale SLAUGHTER of Hindus is never taught. In America itself Hindus are fighting for their rights as your schools ALSO malign Hindus & Hinduism. britain with its romuila thapar like indologists have been spreading mendacity called aryan versus dravidian blah blah.

          Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is not guilty of whatever christians are doing in India.

          Why are bible thumpers such LIARS ? There are so many issues like monsanto bulldozing its way into India with its gmo seeds ; surrogate mothers , wombs on rent , organs harvesting etc that are totally INIMICAL to what Hindus’ Vedas advocate. It is christians in the guise of allopaths & pharmaceutical industry that are denying Hindus like me our FREEDOM. Most politicians are for SALE in India. They are least bothered about Hindus’ Vedas. Hindu God Sri Ramar built what is called in Tamil Ramar Paalam. Even that gets referred to as “adam’s bridge” by converted christians & anti Hindu communists (dmk , congress & various flotsam jetsam of India.
          Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) did not come up with such a name ‘adam’s bridge’.

          God WILLING should China or some Muslim Ruler can ensure fair treatment of Hindus I am not averse to that. As hindus are powerless & unwilling to do away with the rotten constitution dictated by the british to a dictaphone called ambedkar. Long DEAD dictaphone.

        • linnte says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 7:59 pm

          If you are here to debate the “diabolically evil” doctrine of CHRISTIANITY, I suggest you read the New Testament first before you juxtapose Jesus with Muhammad, or more correctly according to Christian doctrine, juxtapose Jesus with Allah. And I will await the day when we can say “I told you so”, about Islam, but you will probably be gone by then. Go away if you plan on trolling people who don’t live in India, and people who recognise it is the responsibility of India to eradicate the evil from her continent. It’s YOUR job Mr Rajalakshmi. Not ours. We have enough work ahead of us. And if you don’t LIVE in India, maybe it’s time you went back to support your people.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 7:40 pm

          America is very particular about copyright violations etc etc. However it is the christians who have STOLEN most of Hindu Spiritual Texts calling them theirs. Hindus have Srimad Bhagavatham . christians have plagiarized calling it jesus bhagavatham. The list goes on & on.

          You must have heard of inculturation tactics of christians. Muslims do not do that.

        • Champ says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 9:39 pm

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi”, this is Jihad Watch, not Christian Watch. You are in the wrong place if you’re only here to demonize Christianity and defend the indefensible islam.

          I suggest that you educate yourself on the key differences between Christianity and islam–before posting comments here. And a good place to start would be with one of Robert Spencer’s books:

          “Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t”

          Please read it and stat! Thank you.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:39 am

          Good posts from linnte< Champ, and Hope.

      • Hope says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 10:56 pm

        Janakiraman Rajalakshmi, obviously you are the one plagued by your own “overwrought imaginations” and outrageous paranoia. Also, your claim that “women are quite safe” in islamic countries would be laughable if it weren’t so sick and twisted. Nobody here needs to “whip up so much of hatred toward muslims.” Muslims engender that hatred all by themselves by committing never-ending acts of violence and supremacy.

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 5:28 am

          Carry on with your hopeless mendacity. What I have written are based on my own experiences. Not on books written by x y z . That way I recall how we were all bludgeoned on our heads about (sic) “weapons of mass destruction” every nano second by bbc , cnn etc. After destabilizing Middle East triggering chaos among Mulsims blair etc confess today they told all LIES about “weapons of mass destruction” as their only objective was to kill Saddam Hussein , create chaos . This has always been your modus operandi. In Africa you divide people as Hutsis & Tutus & make them slaughter one another. Then rush in with aid agencies , some food & self congratulatorily proclaim to all about your christian commmmmpassion , expertise in nationa building democracyEEEEEE , human rights -the same deja vu charade.

          There are no different Gods. Whatever alleged pain you undergo purportedly is but just desserts served by the SAME Maker. You play around with words to justify your unethical acts. When you INVADE you call it democracyeee. When certain others refuse to genuflect before you you scream ” these people do not integrate….ban entry ..impose sanctions ” & thus perennially wage wars. Sale & manufacture of weapons is big business for you anglo saxons.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 12:38 am

        Importing vaccines and improved-yield agriculture, bad–violent Jihad, not a problem.

        “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

        You admit many of my points are valid. Let us stop there. Why do you presume I want to discuss Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) ?
        ………………………….

        What non-Muslim says “PBUH”? OI wonder what “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi’s” Muslim name is?

        More:

        Hence most Hindus fear christians. Not Muslims.
        ………………………….

        What absolute claptrap. Christians are not murdering Hindus; Muslims are.

        More:

        Our elected representatives dance to the tune of christian mafia. Whatever we are taught in our schools & colleges are all unduly biased against Hindus portraying christians as angels. Christian Inquisitions & large scale SLAUGHTER of Hindus is never taught.
        ………………………….

        Actually, the only large-scale slaughter of Hindus was by Muslims. In fact, the Muslim conquest of India was the bloodiest in history, with up to *80 million* murdered.

        More:

        In America itself Hindus are fighting for their rights as your schools ALSO malign Hindus & Hinduism.
        ………………………….

        This is, of course, not true at all.

        More:

        Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is not guilty of whatever christians are doing in India.
        ………………………….

        Well, that’s true–no one would ever accuse Muslims of running schools, clinics, and charities.

        More:

        It is christians in the guise of allopaths & pharmaceutical industry that are denying Hindus like me our FREEDOM.
        ………………………….

        The idea that providing medication is denying anyone freedom is ludicrous.

        And what does she mean “Hindus like me”? What Hindu lauds Muslim terrorism against India and says “PBUH” when speaking of the foul “Prophet” of Islam?

        More:

        Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) did not come up with such a name ‘adam’s bridge’.
        ………………………….

        Of course not. “Convert or die” is more their speed…

        More:

        God WILLING should China or some Muslim Ruler can ensure fair treatment of Hindus I am not averse to that.
        ………………………….

        We see what “fair treatment of Hindus” we find under the Muslim rulers of Pakistan:

        “Pakistan: Muslims waving pistols storm Hindu temple, desecrate idol of Hindu deity”

        https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/pakistan-muslims-waving-pistols-storm-hindu-temple-desecrate-idol-of-hindu-deity

        Is this what “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” has in mind?

        More:

        You must have heard of inculturation tactics of christians. Muslims do not do that.
        ………………………….

        Muslims are more apt to kidnap and rape their victims, then threaten to murder their families if they do not convert. So civilized…sarc/off

        • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 5:12 am

          There is no need for me to resort to LIES like crypto christians who retain Hindu names , everything Hindu including food eaten , dress worn , bindi etc on forehead , Mangalsutra included BUT are stealth christians. This is how christians whip up murderous hatred in the same people hitherto Hindus by converting them to christianity. And these terrorists unleash all kinds of terrorism blaming Muslims & Hindus instead.

          It is you obdurate folks who KNOW yet pretend , argue & delete my comments. I am not a new entrant here. Earlier when I pointed out just a few instances of christians’ TERRORISM I was at once ex-communicated from this site. I recall the same gravenimage & one marisol too was there. Most of my earlier comments were all deleted. So much for your freedom of speech:-(( It was indeed a BLESSING in disguise for me to get a clearer insight into christians’ CHICANERY.

          Why I write PBUH ? It is MY HINDU CULTURE. My HINDU Ramana Bhagavan & Kaanchi MaHaPeriyavar have made me what I am. NOWHERE have my Hindu Vedic SAGES / Gurus have badmouthed / maligned Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). It is certain others the uber arrogant who don the atheist / agnostic / rational / anti Hindu hats maligning Hindu Gods WITHIN India itself with the wholehearted approbation of most people who are but beholden to christian missionaries. It is an open secret.

          Hindus’ Lord Ssiva was described by christians of India as (sic) “penis / phallus” & this printed blasphemous crap along with lot more crap ( what else can one expect from knavish christians) was circulated all over in Karnataka . benny hinns booted out of america landed in Karnataka with the active assistance of catholic sonia gandi of congress party. When a few Hindus protested verbally as establishment NEVER protects Hindus , at once they were lathicharged ( baton blows) branded Hindu fascists by all media including new york times , washington post , bbc , cnn all blah blahs.

          Do not ask me to read up that testament & this testament. My Holy Book Vedas are comprehensive enough. That way I know Jesus Christ warns you folks not to LIE. You FAIL in this fundamental first step.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 2:06 pm

          Wading into this morass is quite unpleasant. Here we go:

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” wrote:

          There is no need for me to resort to LIES like crypto christians who retain Hindu names , everything Hindu including food eaten , dress worn , bindi etc on forehead , Mangalsutra included BUT are stealth christians.
          ………………………………………

          There is no “Christian” dress. Christians can wear Saris and have traditional Indian names and wear Bindis. Nothing “stealthy” about this.

          More:

          This is how christians whip up murderous hatred in the same people hitherto Hindus by converting them to christianity. And these terrorists unleash all kinds of terrorism blaming Muslims & Hindus instead.
          ………………………………………

          How does converting to Christianity “whip up hatred”, again? How does objecting to Muslim terrorism make one a “terrorist”?

          More:

          It is you obdurate folks who KNOW yet pretend , argue & delete my comments. I am not a new entrant here.
          ………………………………………

          Is “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi”, perhaps, perverse poster “Crows and Cows”, who–if I recall correctly, it was quite a number of years ago–claimed that India deserved Muslim violence because of the shortcomings of her political leaders?

          More:

          Earlier when I pointed out just a few instances of christians’ TERRORISM I was at once ex-communicated from this site. I recall the same gravenimage & one marisol too was there. Most of my earlier comments were all deleted. So much for your freedom of speech:-(( It was indeed a BLESSING in disguise for me to get a clearer insight into christians’ CHICANERY.
          ………………………………………

          Jihad Watch is not obliged to provide *anyone* with a platform–not myself, and not anyone else, either.

          As for having been here a long time, I do not apologize for being a long-time poster at Jihad Watch. I first discovered this critically informative site back in 2006. Thank you, Robert Spencer..

          More:

          Why I write PBUH ? It is MY HINDU CULTURE.
          ………………………………………

          Nope; sorry. Hinduism does not mandate that Hindus show Muslim respect to their murderers.

          More:

          My HINDU Ramana Bhagavan & Kaanchi MaHaPeriyavar have made me what I am. NOWHERE have my Hindu Vedic SAGES / Gurus have badmouthed / maligned Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). It is certain others the uber arrogant who don the atheist / agnostic / rational / anti Hindu hats maligning Hindu Gods WITHIN India itself with the wholehearted approbation of most people who are but beholden to christian missionaries. It is an open secret.
          ………………………………………

          Well, this screed is just bizarre. Orthodox Muslims *despise* Hindus and Hinduism.

          “India: Muslim mob attacks Hindu procession with stones, burns shops and vehicles, three dead”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/india-muslim-mob-attacks-hindu-procession-with-stones-burns-shops-and-vehicles-three-dead

          “Bangladesh: Muslims with pistols and meat cleavers behead leading Hindu priest inside Hindu temple”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/bangladesh-muslims-with-pistols-and-meat-cleavers-behead-leading-hindu-priest-inside-hindu-temple

          More:

          Hindus’ Lord Ssiva was described by christians of India as (sic) “penis / phallus” & this printed blasphemous crap along with lot more crap ( what else can one expect from knavish christians) was circulated all over in Karnataka . benny hinns booted out of america landed in Karnataka with the active assistance of catholic sonia gandi of congress party. . When a few Hindus protested verbally as establishment NEVER protects Hindus , at once they were lathicharged ( baton blows) branded Hindu fascists by all media including new york times , washington post , bbc , cnn all blah blahs.
          ………………………………………

          Um…what? Pastor Benny Hinn was never “booted out” of America–he lives here in California. Not a personal fan–he is too much of a showman for my taste–but Hinn is *not* violent, and has never assaulted anyone. He held a few prayer services in India back in the 2000s–but he is not based in India, nor does he live there.

          “Janakiraman Rajalakshmi” is ranting about Christian “lies”, but seems to be rather fact challenged herself…

        • Donna says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 2:37 pm

          Graven how do you have this patience? I’ve been following the comment strings on this article and admire how calm you seem to be – taking the time to dissect and answer each and every point made by certain ragers. So different from my own approach (I watch population #s & $$$ movements, there’s enough of you who can counter with religious texts, so I wouldn’t be much of a “value add” there)

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 4:59 pm

          I see that Janakir Raj has come up with a large number of points – some of which merit consideration; however, many are unjustly critical of the West and Christianity and have been effectively countered by Graven. In addition, Graven has provided credible references to back up what he says and Janakir has not. I suspect that Janakir is a Muslim apologist who has been educated in an environment that is anti-Christian and anti-West so his picture of reality is quite limited – thus the “blind men and the elephant effect”. We all suffer from this effect to some degree – but the bulk of the evidence favors Graven.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 5:21 pm

          Thank you, Donna and Ted.

  28. Mubarak says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 3:53 pm

    Correct me if I am wrong: The young woman in the commercial prostitutes herself?
    And the context here suggests that, among other things, that is what we need in order to defeat Islam?

    • Champ says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 4:10 pm

      A “prostitute”? The only thing disgusting and lewd on this thread are your inane offerings. She’s dressed for the beach, but your mind is clearly in the gutter, you pervert. Only a sexual deviant, like yourself, could miss the main point of this headline. Jeez get lost and go take a cold shower.

    • Face_The_Truth says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 4:10 pm

      No, the young woman in the commercial is not prostituting herself since she is not asking you to do sexual activities with her in exchange of money (or anything).

      There’s no quid pro quo involved.

      • Mubarak says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 4:23 pm

        Merriam-Webster:
        Simple Definition of prostitute: to use (something valuable, such as talent) in a way that is not appropriate or respectable and especially to earn money.
        PS: Where is the beach?

        • linnte says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 8:07 pm

          I think it is perfectly appropriate to advertise a bikini. You are a twisted pervert! Out of control in your sexual urges, you make it someone else’s responsibility to control YOU! How spiritually dead you are! Herein lies the basis for Islamic “spiritualism” empty, void of contact with a living God who has RISEN FROM THE DEAD! Jesus teaches us to clean the INSIDE of ourselves not the OUTSIDE. All Islam sees is pride, honor and control. Screw your Allah and the donkey he rides!

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:41 am

          The vicious Mubarak has done this before–implied that Western women are “prostitutes”, and hence deserve to be raped by Muslims.

        • Face_The_Truth says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:36 pm

          This message is for screen-name “moo’Baraq”

          Listen Motherf**ker:

          When you cite Merriam-Webster, make sure to include the full definition, not just what supports your perverted Islamic mind to serve your Islamic cause.

          http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prostitute

          Full Definition of prostitute

          1: to offer indiscriminately for sexual intercourse especially for money

          2: to devote to corrupt or unworthy purposes : debase

          Muslim motherf**kers like you have been engaged in female sex-slave markets throughout world to this day!!!

          So, do not try to teach me basic human modesty; because, I do not need that lesson from a Muslim motherf**ker like you.

  29. Douglas Gray says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 4:32 pm

    It would be interesting to talk to the Mayor’s two teenage daughters, candidly, without any fear of censure or punishment from their Dad. How do they react to these poster ads? Is it with “feeling body shamed” or perhaps it stimulates a desire to become more fit, watch one’s diet, and live a healthier lifestyle? If a certain number of people respond to the advertisement in this way, it could possibly result in a net savings for the overburdened British Health Care System, due to at least some people adopting a healthier lifestyle.

    • Mubarak says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 5:05 pm

      Yes, and how they would react to posters of naked young men demonstrating how to put on condoms. Yes, I mean, why not? In the interest of public health.

      • Mubarak says

        Jun 15, 2016 at 5:13 pm

        PS: Not 6-inchers of cause. That would be offensive.

        • linnte says

          Jun 15, 2016 at 8:10 pm

          You have never used a condom in your life. A condom is put on an erect penis, not a flaccid one. And there is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with teaching teenagers how to use a condom, be they male or female. Condoms could have prevented millions of Africans from contracting HIV. What a sorry, controlled being you are.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 12:46 am

        Mubarak finds pictures of young women offensive, but Muslims raping them in public is edifying.

        • Mubarak says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 4:00 am

          I just find them offensive when they wear clothes, GI, that’s all

        • Face_The_Truth says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 12:48 pm

          This message is for screen-name “moo’Baraq”

          Muslim motherf**kers like you have raped millions of non-Muslim females in order to create a generational bastard like yourself.

          Your Islamic religion’s history is replete with mass rape and slave-markets for non-Muslim captured females.

          And, from those generational rape of captured females a Muslim bastard like yourself was born.

  30. No Fear says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 6:45 pm

    Keep showing the pictures of the girls, just cover them with black bags with eye slits.

  31. gravenimage says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    Sharia London: Muslim mayor bans “body shaming” advertisements
    ………………………

    “Body shaming”–uh huh. Muslims have no problems co opting Western rhetoric in order to impose Islamic norms.

    This is really about the Muslim mayor removing images of a girl in a bikini from public sight.

    Fox News had it right about this story:

    “London’s new Muslim mayor takes aim at sexy subway ads”

    “The newly elected mayor of London’s call for a ban on public ads that show scantily clad women has critics complaining the move has more to do with his Muslim roots than his concerns about “body-shaming.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/06/14/london-mayor-bans-tube-ads-that-promote-unhealthy-body-image.html

    And here’s some open dhimmitude in Germany:

    “Germany bans sexy women in ads after Cologne Muslim sex assaults”

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/germany-bans-sexy-women-in-ads-after-cologne-muslim-sex-assaults

    • Mubarak says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 7:35 pm

      Forget sexy women. What is in now is sexy men. And only an army of sexy men on posters in our big cities can convert Muslims out of their religion.
      But as always GI: an insightful and illuminating comment.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 12:47 am

        More claptrap from the foul Mubarak.

  32. Ciudadano says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 7:38 pm

    People are entitled to think and say whatever they want about this ad, but there is no valid reason to censor it. Essentially this is a small, albeit successful, attack on free speech. In this case it seems trivial and irrelevant because it is just about a silly ad, but probably the same tactics will be used in the future for more serious matters. And that’s what is worse in this case, the tactic used to ban it: victimization.

    Instead of judging the merits or wrongs of the ad they assume the role of victims of the ad. Once they are the victims you can not challenge or refute their opinions, because everything is about their hurt feelings and self-image. And other people’s feelings are none of your business.

    The precedent is, if you want your government to ban something you don’t like don’t waste your time providing solid, rational, foundations for your request, just play the victim role, collect 70,000 “signatures” in a web site and get your way.

    Just fill in the blanks: “________ makes me ashamed of my _________” , ” _______ could cause ______ confidence issues”, or make up your own psychobabble, That’s all you need in our new Orwellian world to have your government censoring something you don’t like. Imagine the possibilities.

    As expected, the major promptly took advantage of the opportunity to apply sharia like restrictions, disguised as an imaginary public health issue.

    • Infidela says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 9:28 pm

      I agree with you. Banning this ad is so wrong. It’s the thin edge of the wedge. It will only get worse from here.

  33. Wellington says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 8:49 pm

    Demonstrating once again that there is a true nexus between those who 1) hate freedom from the get-go as Muzzies do; and those who 2) abuse freedom by not realizing that with freedom must come common sense, moral intelligence and a sense of decorum..

    Mark Twain put it best (so often he did) when he said that Americans have the right to do and say almost anything but the good sense not to exercise such right on many occasions. Well, since Twain’s time, many in America and all the West have lost this good sense and thus this EXACTLY plays into the hands of the Islamic world’s never allowing freedom in the first place since Islam confuses responsible freedom with inexcusable license. Fitting though since the Islamic world confuses a veritable plethora of matters, just one of its many deficiencies.

    Freedom is great. The death of freedom is not. Also a negative is freedom abused. Herein lies in summary form what I have contended here.

  34. Champ says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:13 pm

    IRONY ALERT!

    islam >> the religion of misogyny and shaming women

    • linnte says

      Jun 15, 2016 at 10:50 pm

      So correct ! Just by making this an issue is exactly SHAMING women. Sadiq Khan the master of Taqyyia.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 12:48 am

      So true–that idea that Muslims oppressing and murdering women is less “shaming” is just grotesque.

  35. Infidela says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 9:24 pm

    I love underwear and bikini ads. For a start I wear underwear, and I think that underwear and bikini ads are sexy. To prevent these ads from being shown are demeaning to women, because it says that women ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE SEXY. What’s wrong with being sexy?

  36. bdhbdh says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:24 pm

    sorry england…we need some body shaming…though i suppose burying our heads in the sand is a better way. thank god for the social warriors of the left. my daughters were probably going to become suicidal maniacs after seeing a fit girl in a poster if not for this intervention.

    http://www.theweek.co.uk/56831/britains-obesity-crisis-why-is-the-uk-so-fat

  37. citycat says

    Jun 15, 2016 at 11:30 pm

    He’s lying to advance Islam. A pig is a pig and cannot be reformed.
    If you want to manifest the truth then make sure you are invisible.

  38. Mubarak says

    Jun 16, 2016 at 3:53 am

    We use a lot of energy defending free speech, and who can deny that it is essential to our societies.
    I just want to introduce a couple of phenomena, that by the way is demonstratively well known here on JW in the comment section and also an honored praxis in the Muslim camp, but seldom considered: COMPULSIVE SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR. Why don’t we spend some time and space discussing that?
    Personally I want to confess that I am against it.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 16, 2016 at 2:10 pm

      By which Mubarak means he does not believe anyone should be allowed to call him on his vicious bs.

      • Champ says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 2:40 pm

        Precisely, Graven! This creep “mubarak” wants to reserve the right of free speech only for himself–to call women pictured in bikinis “prostitutes” and that’s that. No one DARE challenge this pious mohammedan and his twisted and perverted way of thinking.

        Get over yourself moo-barak. You thinking stinks like wet skunk. Only much worse.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 3:12 pm

          Champ, please don’t offend wet skunks . . .

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 16, 2016 at 5:58 pm

          Hi Champ and Cecilia!

        • Champ says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 11:46 pm

          LOL, Cecilia!! 😀

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Jun 16, 2016 at 6:12 pm

        Graven, your comments are superb! Though seldom said, they are a vast reference source for those who read them. Well done, my friend!

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 12:41 am

          🙂

        • Mubarak says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 5:02 pm

          Yes, it is really sad that GI couldn’t make it to the article section! –
          Anyhow, the articles here on JW rings the bells for Pavlov’s dogs, so I am sure GI feels more at home in the comment section, where he can feed his stomach.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 5:58 pm

          Mubarak, your comment says more about you than it does about other JW readers. Indicative of the First Amendment, you have the right to speak, as does any other individual who visits this website. The internet is replete with articles that report on atrocities attributed to those who adhere to the Islamic ideology, but which manage somehow to be devoid of any reference to that ideology as a prime motivator. This website serves as a current repository for many of those articles, enabling those who so desire to review news reports at one location.

          The JW audience is comprised of professionals who represent academic, judicial, scientific, military, religious, journalistic, philosophical or political arenas, to name but a few. At this website, each person has the freedom to comment on the material at hand, that they do is not a rote response.

          Gravenimage is highly intelligent, extremely well-versed in Islamic hegemony, and, as I said — and I now repeat — one from whom I have learned much.

        • Champ says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 7:11 pm

          Cecilia, I second your comment concerning Graven! Yes, *she* is a tremendous treasure to Jihad Watch! …as are you! 🙂

          (“mubarak” is clueless and referred to Graven as a “he”)

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 10:02 pm

          Mubarak wrote:

          Anyhow, the articles here on JW rings the bells for Pavlov’s dogs…
          …………………

          In other words, we are upset over Jihad savagery and the imposition of Shari’ah law–which makes us “dogs” as Mubarak sees it.

          Not the first time he has characterized Anti-Jihadists as dogs–he referred to me as an “enraged dog” for opposing Muslim rape on another thread.

          And thanks again, Cecilia and Champ! I always look for your posts, as well!

  39. Krag says

    Jun 16, 2016 at 6:06 am

    If it looks like a pig, smells like a pig
    Tastes like a pig, then it probably is a
    Pig.
    My own two cents pence here.
    Sad tragic and pathetic as it is, some
    of our citizens in the Western world yearn for the moral certainties of a previous era.
    They identify with the new mayor of London as a man who they think atm
    shares theirs. They are truely horrified a near naked woman can appear on a billboard in the public gaze. Shock horror.
    Wait until they are invited to public executions. I believe these were banned not because it demeaned the executed but because the public enjoyed it so much.
    islam of course welcomes such intercourse. It means to them that now they control the public space they can now intrude on our private space as well.
    Keep your powder dry for the next round.

    • Donna says

      Jun 18, 2016 at 1:04 pm

      Krag = Taquiyya? So you found another one of my ids? so what…. it’s not like you can do anything with it. Your attempts at subtlety are lame, obviously a coward who has to use double speak because he doesn’t have the balls to come right out and say it.
      ~Signed DONNA (because I don’t hide behind fake names)

      • Donna says

        Jun 18, 2016 at 4:15 pm

        Jihad Watch – It would prob be a good time to explain the above comment. There’s a particularly vile group that follows me from site to site, they think they are being subtle, but I can pick them out pretty quickly these days. These vermin are cowards, and do not have the courage to speak directly, either online or in person. If I’m wrong and this person is one of your regulars then I apologize.

  40. Twerzig says

    Jun 16, 2016 at 6:45 am

    What a beautiful young woman. I bet she worked really hard to look so fantastic. She will be proud and doubtless a very fine athlete.
    Are these people afraid of a vital female, a strong woman.
    This is body shapeism, she represents a particular body type that tends to be slender and tall. That might be 30 percent of the population. Is it misogyny to denigrate her physical beauty, yes.

  41. duh_swami says

    Jun 16, 2016 at 8:53 am

    You can’t force modesty and morals on the liberal left…

    I used to go to the nudist beaches on the South Yuba Rivers set up an alter to Geo Bush on a rock with his photo and flowers,,,Some nudists were curious and asked who the man was…So I told them about family values and the virtue of modesty…some of them took notes but no one got dressed…

  42. gravenimage says

    Jun 17, 2016 at 12:52 am

    I just received a round-up of features on uber-liberal Care2–these are usually feel-good pieces about animal rescues and female empowerment and that sort of thing. Well, this batch had *this* clueless story:

    “London Mayor’s Ad Ban is a Huge Step for Body Positivity”

    “London’s new mayor, Sadiq Khan, may have secured his position as a feminist hero by eliminating advertisements from the city’s public transportation that ‘conform to unhealthy or unrealistic body images….’”

    Talk about unclear on the concept!

    Luckily, even here a handful of the commenters seem to have a clue. Although there is one very approving comment from–you guessed it–a Muslimah in a Hijab.

    (You can Google “Care2” and the title if you want to find the story)

  43. BC says

    Jun 17, 2016 at 9:23 am

    , “I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies”.
    Is he not aware that the Quran demeans women from the very start when it declares that ‘allah’ has declared that women are under the control of men as they are only worth half a man?

  44. Mubarak says

    Jun 17, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    Will anybody deny that the young woman in the commercial is selling her body?

    • Champ says

      Jun 17, 2016 at 7:13 pm

      Will anybody deny that “mubarak” is stuck on stupid?

      • Mubarak says

        Jun 17, 2016 at 7:48 pm

        —- and that Muslim women in the West by their traditional clothing presents a devastating ironic nemesis over the celebration of public nudity in our culture?
        It is so stuck on funny that Monty Python’s Flying Circus could have written the script – and the feminists are totally helpless and speechless.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 17, 2016 at 11:18 pm

          Mubarak wrote:

          —- and that Muslim women in the West by their traditional clothing presents a devastating ironic nemesis over the celebration of public nudity in our culture?
          …………………….

          Mubarak first brought up nudity when he said that since a woman had protested the New Year’s Eve rapes in the nude that this proved that Western women deserved to be raped:

          Mubarak says
          February 16, 2016 at 4:27 am

          I know it is not political correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.

          Is this offense of public nudity informed by a morality that is loftier than the one that is protested against —? And the West is filled with vulgar, public commercials and public exposures of women narcissistically prostituting themselves and their bodies to the effect…

          And shouldn’t women in the West be happy anyway, that they can attract the attention of newcomers, and that these take trouble to bother them?…

          So thank God for Muslims who migrate or immigrate to the west. If we can persuade them to absorb what is their and our Judeo-Christian inheritance – blood and public nudity – and exhale what they falsely and deceivingly believe to be theirs, the world could be a beautiful place. But to that end we need the prophet Isaiah – not a hysterical performance artist.

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853

          As for his referring to “traditional clothing”, he means the Hijab, the Niqab, and the Burqa. What sort of “devastating ironic nemesis” does it present?

          A pious Imam, Mohammad Al-Jibaly. He said, “A girl should start hijab from the age of seven. By the age of ten, it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear Hijab, and if she doesn’t wear Hijab, we hit her”.

          And where does this lead? Why, to *this*:

          “Islamic State stones five women to death for not wearing the veil”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/islamic-state-stones-five-women-to-death-for-not-wearing-the-veil

          Muslim rape, Muslim child beatings, forced Islamic veiling, and Muslim stoning us to death.

          *This* is what Mubarak has in mind for all of us.

        • Mubarak says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 3:53 am

          All I am saying is: if we won’t heed a morality informed by Christianity, Islam will take its place, and our house will be left to us desolate. Not a new or original perception.

        • linnte says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 4:15 am

          Mu, it is not Governments responsibility to promote/legislate morality. A multicultural nation like America would come apart at the seams if Gov did that. To me, Islam is immoral. To some, Christianity is horrible! And honestly, if all the “bad, unethical, violent, self supporting sura in the Qur’an were removed so no other non muslims rights were infringed on, most if not all people wouldn’t give a rat’s tail about what Islam does or thinks. Ah h irony. Islam could enjoy all the West has to offer, worship their Allah and revere their Muhammad as the perfect man……but he isn’t and that’s the problem. My dog has more integrity than your Allah/Muhammad ever dreamed of.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 18, 2016 at 4:40 pm

          Mubarak wrote:

          All I am saying is: if we won’t heed a morality informed by Christianity, Islam will take its place, and our house will be left to us desolate. Not a new or original perception.
          …………………………….

          The idea that Mubarak is championing Christian modesty here is quite false.

          What he is doing is insisting that we adopt Shari’ah strictures on our freedoms, or else suffer more Muslim violence.

          He has also flogged this idea many times before–that Islam attacks the West because of our (supposed) decadence.

          But he never says, if this is the case, why Muslims also burn down Christian churches in Nigeria, and rape Catholic nuns in India, and hack Buddhist priests to death in Thailand, and take culturally conservative Yezidi girls as sex slaves in the Islamic State.

          The idea that we would not be targets of Muslim violence if only we banned ads like the one above is absolute claptrap.

          And–a minor point in all this but still of interest–the idea that Christianity necessarily condemns the wearing of bikinis is also incorrect. While some might opt for a one-piece instead, many devout Christian women are fine with bikinis.

          Whereas, this is what Muslims have in store for beach-goers:

          “Ivory Coast: Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” open fire at beach resort, murdering at least 12”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/ivory-coast-muslims-screaming-allahu-akbar-open-fire-at-beach-resort-murdering-at-least-12

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Mojdeh on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Henry Mansfield on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Crusades Were Right on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Naildriver on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.