That means that speaking out against jihad violence, or the Sharia oppression of women, non-Muslims, and gays, or the anti-Semitism that is so deeply ingrained in the Qur’an and Sunnah, is not, in Umer Khan’s view, speech that should be accorded protection, but should, rather, be forcibly silenced. Welcome to the New Britain, where people like Umer Khan are in the ascendancy, and soon the freedom of speech will be a dimly-remembered relic of a past despised as jahiliyya.
“Muslim Police Chief Says ‘Offending Culture, Religion And Tradition’ Not Protected As Free Speech,” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, May 9, 2016:
A Muslim Police Chief Inspector for Greater Manchester has indicated that, according to his understanding, “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”.
Chief Inspector Umer Khan made the statement on social media this weekend, and was immediately questioned by alarmed free speech campaigners.
He then apologised to those defending the right to be offensive for any “offence cause”, and argued that, “free speech should be used to promote tolerance & respect all.”
“[The statement regarding free speech] was a thought after a moving visit to Auschwitz”, he added.
When asked if Mr. Khan and the police force generally support the right to offend religious beliefs, the Greater Manchester Police press office told Breitbart London: “I don’t think we support anyone who would want to say anything offence[sic]”.
“It’s a storm in a tea cup… It’s about promoting tolerance, freedom of speech, that’s all he meant with it. He didn’t mean for it to be taken in an offensive way at all… it’s ironic, freedom of speech is what he’s now getting in trouble for”, the press office added.
A Greater Manchester Police Spokesperson added in an official statement: “A GMP Chief Inspector made a post on a personal Twitter account which has been taken out of context.
“He has apologised for any concern caused, which wasn’t the intention and has deleted the post.”
Speaking at the Jewish representative council of Greater Manchester last year, the senior Muslim police officer warned that religious tension was increasing in the city, and said police would tackle perceived “hate speech”.
“I am proud to be a police officer working in Greater Manchester and proud to be a Muslim. We all need to respect each other’s religions”, he said.
Continuing: “Sadly, what is happening in other parts of the world is now coming to impact on the streets of our local communities where we like to think there is supposed to be peace, harmony, respect and tolerance.
“Over the last few years I have seen an increase in tensions between different communities and there have been massive increases in hate crime [against both Muslims and Jews]”, he said.
To tackle the perceived “hate speech”, Mr. Khan explained how Greater Manchester Police have launch a ‘We Stand Together’ campaign, which has been promoted alongside a phone app to make reporting perceived “hate crimes” easier.
However, a writer at the Godless Spell Checker blog, which first reported Mr. Khan’s tweet, gave a well rehearsed argument for why “offending’” religion is important, and not always a “hate crime”.
“Of course, any thinking person knows that [offending dogma is] exactly what freedom of speech means. Speech can never truly be ‘free’ unless it includes the right to say things some people may not enjoy hearing.
“Indeed, the right to ‘blaspheme’, mock sacred cows and challenge taboos is what has led to progress in any civil society. The price for this has always been ‘offense’. And the great thing about ‘offense’ is that it’s cheap.
“By Umer Khan’s understanding, we are not free to offend people who endorse FGM, denigrate gay people as ‘sinners’ or think the appropriate punishment for adultery is death by stoning. It’s their ‘culture’, ‘tradition’ and ‘religion’ after all.”
Mr. Khan has been a police officer for more than twenty years, yet this re-interpretation of free speech comes at a time when British police are increasing their efforts to prosecute any “offensive” posts made on social media….


Joseph says
Hi Robert Spencer,
Would you post every attack by Islam worldwide, especially, during Ramadan. This way people can see the pattern on a global scale.
I know it is obvious, however, many people (if not most) cannot connect the dots.
Thanking you in advance.
Joseph
Robert Spencer says
See thereligionofpeace.com
overman says
Thanks Robert. Only day 11 and already 713 dead.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Robert. And these are just the ones that make the news.
Jerry says
Every once and a while they slip up and reveal their true colors, they go too far with their sharia aggression. He says that “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”. But you notice they never apply that vague and unfixed maxim to themselves, only the infidel. He says that “free speech should be used to promote tolerance & respect all.” Well first off, if you think it’s your job to determine what constitutes “free speech” then it’s not free speech, you dumb c*nt. And then “I don’t think we support anyone who would want to say anything offence[sic]”. Does that include “Slay the infidel”? Probably not.
They’re getting cocky, they are getting stronger in numbers, their giant enclaves are giving them courage to assert their sharia bigotry like we knew they would. It’s only going to get worse. And I hate to say it, but I do think we’ve lost Britain.
Hindu American says
The islamic infiltration is almost complete. Chief Inspector Clouseau…er..Khan said this, and I quote:
“I am proud to be a police officer working in Greater Manchester and proud to be a Muslim. We all need to respect each other’s religions”
No mention of being a proud British or English or “happy to be part of a western society where freedom is valued above all”. Instead, “proud to be a muslim”. It won’t be long before he uses his position to promote islamic justice and jurisprudence.
England, thy days are truly numbered. The sun is about to set. These are self-inflicted wounds and no one cares.
Jerry says
So true. Spencer, Geller, Wilders, they’ve all been warning about this eventuality. And now it’s come true. We can still save America, Trump does offer some hope. But frankly, even he scares me a bit. He’s a loose cannon, but at least he’s aiming in the right direction.
Georg says
The CJ community has unfortunately been proven right. Muslims are assiduously remaking our society into the kind they’ve fled. What a horrific and retarded culture.
BC says
Bear in mind the Trump you think you know is the one filtered through the media. showing him as loud mouthed and a loose cannon is the way they want you to see him
IQ al Rassooli says
This Muslim speaks like ALL Muslims with utter CONTEMPT to the intellect and sensibilities of ALL none Muslims and with obscene degrees of mendacity, hypocrisy and duplicity!
He said: “I am proud to be a police officer working in Greater Manchester and proud to be a Muslim. We all need to respect each other’s religions”
BUT he conveniently (like ALL Muslims) overlooks the FACT that there is NOT a SINGLE verse in Muhammad’s Quran that shows ANY Respect for any belief system outside Islam BUT on the contrary shows only hate and contempt!
No Muslim can ever be LOYAL to the British or American people who are NOT Muslims since they are considered Kuffar/ Infidels (enemies of Muhammad & Allah) to be either Subjugated or Slaughtered
The only reason he is in this extremely important position is because of our leasers’ contemptous Political Correctness that ‘We the People’ should overthrow by ANY means
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
Michael Copeland says
“We all need to respect each other’s religions”, says Umer Khan. Here is the “excellent pattern” for muslims praised in Koran 60:4 (part of Islamic law):
“Between us and you animosity and hatred forever….”.
That is the level of “respect” recommended by Islam.
SBJ says
That’s why the UK needs to get out of the clutches of the EU. The EU member states have become vassals of US foreign policy. They are having a referendum June 23. I so hope the LEAVE campaign wins. It will see the crumbling of the EU as states regain their own sovereign rights and are once again in control of their immigration policies.
Blackrod says
What makes you think he has not already used his position against non Muslims?
Michael Copeland says
From the UK’s Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006
29J
Protection of freedom of expression
“Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.”
Under Cameron the law is not being upheld.
Jerry says
And such a law should be all encompassing to include the beliefs of humanists, New Agers, and atheists, too, to name a few who might be offended by islam’s attack on them. As an atheist I finds islam to be deeply “restrictive” and “insulting” and “abusive.” It proffers murder for god and is causing it. It proffers abuse of women and does it. It condones rape of children in marriage and they do it. And the list goes on. I’m not offering here some highly convolute theory to slander their faith, they f*cking tell us this shit! they preach it! they threaten it! It’s written in their religious books as the highest truth to guide their people. Yes, I am offended, my beliefs are insulted every f*cking day. The difference is, their people are the ones doing all the raping and killing, torturing and persecuting, of innocents for religion. So ya know what you leftist c*nts, I somehow feel like I have a better case.
Thanks Michael Copeland for giving me the chance to sound off.
Neville J. Angove says
The changes in the UK I have read off the the UK press make me feel certain that the UK has turned the corner towards becoming an Islamic state, and there is no real hope for it. The politicians supporting the EU and Islam is one thing, but the police now forced to support it defines the change. It is almost certain that the vote on June 23 for leaving the EU will fail, partly due to the large Muslim voting bloc, and partly due to entrenched financial interests seeing a good gain from the chaos of staying. Goodbye, a civilised UK.
gravenimage says
Don’t give up yet. *Fight*!
Jerry says
And that’s why muslims are offended when we talk about it. Hearing the truth about themselves can’t help but be offensive.
mortimer says
Sharia law’s wording is significant: O11.10 (The Dhimmi agreement is violated…blasphemy of a kafir…mentions something impermissible…life and property are unprotected)
-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
Note: Sharia law applies TO NON-MUSLIMS who must submit to Sharia law against their will or be executed!
eagle says
The United States has the right to protect itself from any and all threats by any means necessary. It has the right to profile, discriminate and destroy any threat presented to the American People with Gods Help..You cannot defeat the enemy by allowing the Muslim culture to cut your head off. We need to get Congress to push through a bill removing all Muslims from government and remove CAIR and the Brotherhood along with the Muslim president from this country. This Muslim culture is the enemy of the American People and the constitution of the United States. They are a sick culture that wants to bring down every decent thing created by God. God Bless Trump for at least telling the truth about Obama, please continue.
Jerry says
That’s true. Let’s be honest, it’s a gangster mentality. Allah and muhammad were thugs that murdered and it brought them success. Allah’s apostle said,
“…I have been made victorious with terror…”
Now for a people more known for their inbreeding and low IQ’s that offers a kind of hope, that through violence they can achieve some kind of prominence in the world. I think it’s our duty as humanists, Christians, Jews, atheists, and practically everyone else with a greater moral understanding to show them why they’re wrong.
And lest anyone think I’m talking hateful trash about “inbreeding,” please see this:
http://www.barnhardt.biz/the-one-about/the-one-about-muslims-being-inbred/
http://www.trueorthodoxy.org/non_christian_islam_inbreeding.shtml
http://10news.dk/?p=526
mortimer says
When Muslims have important jobs you get supremacists in important jobs.
Question: Are all Muslims supremacists?
Answer: Yes.
Question: How do you know that?
Answer: Islam is a supremacist ideology. If a Muslim does not believe in supremacism, he has left Islam.
Chief Inspector Umer Khan is a supremacists who will betray the UK because his religion requires it.
Michael Copeland says
“I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be.”
Samir Khan, late of New York.
GrahamTurner says
it is interesting that we preface, everything with “not all Muslims are terrorists.” But never say “not all critics of Islam are bigots, racists or islamophobes
Dan says
What a moron.
Last I heard, killing those who offend you is the epitome of offending someone.
When it comes to investigating Muslim crimes of hate, he’s just like French police inspector Andre in the movie Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. “Do not worry. As police inspector I give you my word, the case will be investigated in a very slipshod manner.”
Ellen says
Well all we hear from moslims is that we are the infidels even while we are christians, and the jews have to take more awful talk, woman have more worse to digest than we like So the religion of peace isn’t very peaceful at all, no right to lection us at all. So do your things ,leave us in peace, let us do our things and do you yours. i am not interested at all in other things than good behavior, and even that is not always a normal question.
Jay Boo says
UK Muslim child rape gangs are offensive.
Hindu American says
Not to the muslims in the UK. It is part of their culture and dictate from above, and therefore, normal and acceptable for them.
mortimer says
In Umer Khan’s home country of Pakistan, when a filthy kafir says something ‘impermissible’ about Islam, the local mullah calls a mob, the non-Muslim blasphemer is dragged out into the street and savagely murdered (no one saw anything…no witnesses remember anything), then the blasphemer’s family is savagely beaten, then their homes are robbed, then their homes are burned down, then the whole neighborhood where the non-Muslims live is looted and burned down and non-Muslims raped and beaten.
That is what Umer Khan wants to see in UK…Islamic vigilantism! He should be kicked out of the police. I would not trust him to apply the law fairly.
Fred M says
A Chief Inspector is not a police chief, he’s quite low down the totem pole. But I dare say his superiors would echo all that crap. ‘Freedom is speech is okay as long as I agree with it, but if not I can ban it.’
mortimer says
Not all, but SOME police seem to think, ‘Oh…free speech…as long as it doesn’t make the job of the police harder!’
Some politicians seem to feel the same. The police were hired to DEFEND FREE SPEECH FROM HOODLUMS WHO WANT TO REMOVE IT!
We must insist that the police NOT SUPPORT THE HECKLER’S VETO!
Baucent says
“We all need to respect each other’s religions” Do we? I would have thought respecting others right to a religious belief or not was the key point. But having the right to disagree and broadcast that disagreement is a pillar of Western culture. Muslim Police officers clearly don’t share that understanding.
mortimer says
Two-thirds of the Koran is hate speech.
mortimer says
Umer Khan is 100% wrong: Freedom of speech DOES IN FACT MEAN the freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition.
-US Justice Clark in 1952 wrote: “[I]t is enough to point out that the state has no legitimate interest in protecting any or all religions from views distasteful to them. … It is not the business of government in our nation to suppress real or imagined attacks upon a particular religious doctrine.”
-US Justice Frankfurter noted that beliefs “ … dear to one may seem the rankest ‘sacrilege’ to another,” and added concerning “sacrilegious” speech: “[H]istory does not encourage reliance on the wisdom and moderation of the censor.”
-The Supreme Court of India on Monday 3 March 2014, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) by Advocate M L Sharma seeking intervention by the court in directing the Election Commission to curb hate speeches. Dismissing the plea, the Apex court said that it could not curb the fundamental right of the people to express themselves.
“We cannot curtail fundamental rights of people. It is a precious right guaranteed by Constitution,” a bench headed by Justice RM Lodha said, adding “we are a mature democracy and it is for the public to decide. We are 1280 million people and there would be 1280 million views. One is free not to accept the view of others”. Also the court said that it is a matter of perception, and a statement objectionable to a person might be normal to another person.
-The Irish Law Reform Commission’s 1991 Report opined that “there is no place for the offence of blasphemous libel in a society which respects freedom of speech.”
It refused to allow the prosecution, stating “in the absence of any legislative definition of the constitutional offence of blasphemy, it is impossible to say of what the offence of blasphemy consists … In the absence of legislation and in the present uncertain state of the law the Court could not see its way to authorising the institution of a criminal prosecution”.
-The right to blaspheme religion is one of the most elemental exercises of political liberalism. One cannot defend the right without defending the practice.
Jonathan Chait, Daily Intelligencer, January 7, 2015
-“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” – George Washington
-“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” – Harry S. Truman
-If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” – George Orwell
-“The principle of free thought is not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought we hate.” -Oliver Wendell Holmes, US Supreme Court Justice, in United States v. Schwimmer (1929).
-“Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.” -Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media (1992).
-“The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish.” – Justice Robert H. Jackson, prosecutor at the Nuremburg Trials
-“…if any opinion is compelled to silence, that opinion may, for aught we can certainly know, be true. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility.”
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859).
St. Croix says
Great post, Mortimer. Lots of gems for use on social media to counter some of the idiocy getting shared around.
Hindu American says
Mortimer,
Freedom of speech is one half of the liberty we, in America, (yet) enjoy – take for granted. It is freedom from retribution after freedom of speech that is valuable to all of us. What happens afterwards is critical.
Even in muslim and other “secular” middle eastern dictatorships, there is an imagery of “freedom of speech”. People complain and criticize in those countries all the time. What happens after one has exercised that right to freedom of speech, is important. In muslim nations you are automatically declared wajib-ul-qatl (fit for death or murder).
mortimer says
Ruling of Justice Easterbrook in Hedges:
-“The police are supposed to preserve order, which UNPOPULAR SPEECH may endanger. Does it follow that the police MAY SILENCE the rabble-rousing speaker? NOT AT ALL. The police MUST PERMIT the speech and CONTROL THE CROWD. THERE IS NO HECKLER’S VETO. Just as bellicose bystanders cannot authorize the government to silence a speaker, so ignorant bystanders CANNOT make censorship legitimate.”
kilfincelt says
As soon as Muslims rule the UK, all that religious tolerance would fly out the window along with much of English law. Anything that would remind the British of their heritage would also be destroyed. That is what happened in much of medieval Spain under Islamic rule. The paradise and tolerance found in al-Andalus was a complete myth although any number of “useful idiots” like Karen Armstrong and others of her ilk argue otherwise.
Unfortunately, I see the beginnings of a civil war in Europe as more and more people begin to see the true face of Islam.
Carolyne says
I see no civil war in Europe. The English, like sheep to the slaughter, say nothing when their government has usurped their rights. The Germans didn’t rise up against Hitler. No, they joined him. And they elect and re-elect Merkel. I believe the English will vote to stay in the EU, the organization responsible for the no borders policy which has allowed barbarians to colonize their country.
In the US we have a President who has issued many illegal mandates and our Congress does nothing to stop him and our people will probably elect a woman who will continue the usurping the power of the people, flooding our country with Syrian terrorists because she has been handsomely paid off by Saudi Arabia. She has already mentioned that that the Constitution can be changed, specifically referring to the Second Amendment. She has attended a meeting of a UN agency in Istanbul, convened to discuss the outlawing of criticism of Islam. Her close aide (!) is a Saudi Arabian.
Maybe I am just depressed today, but I see no way out of this mess our leaders have made.
linnte says
Oh Carolyne, I know the feeling! I think half the reason I read JW constantly is because it keeps my mind off dwelling on what COULD be. We CAN beat this! I don’t know HOW but I know we will. Hoping to God that Britain leaves the EU, and that Trump wins. Both those things will be a scathing blow to Islam.
Peace to you!
Manual Paleologos says
That’s the UK. They don’t have freedom, there.
We at least still have a little.
biff says
Apparently women and men are “equal” wink wink.
http://www.iranpoliticsclub.net/library/english-library/obama-benghazi/images/Hillary%20Clinton%20&%20Obama%20Muslim%20Hijab%20laughing.jpg
Equal until they show up in the middle east and try to shake the hand of a muslim.
biff says
Trying the link again
Georg says
“Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”
Yes it does, you Muslim troglodyte. Get a clue.
Ciudadano says
First, it is not the job of the police to define what free speech is or is not.
Second, the police chief is absolutely wrong. Freedom of speech is all about been able to express one’s opinions against the authority and against the establishment, including religion, without fear of retaliation.
gravenimage says
So true. Good post.
Marty says
He said “I don’t think we support anyone who would want to say anything offence[sic]”.
This is a great relief to mainstream Brits.
It means that he will not support muslims, the most offensive group of immigrants
that the UK has yet suffered.
They are overpromoted in all aspects of politics, & our ghastly Mayor of London
recently held a meeting, (naturally pro EU), where the men sat at the front
& the women sat at the back.
The sort of apartheid “progressives” support, because it is anti Western & anti Christian.
linnte says
Seriously? A meeting of Muslims and NON MUSLIMS and people tolerated that? Insane!
Charli Main says
” We all need to respect each other’s religions”
Lying piece of Muslim pig shyte. Since when have Muslims EVER respected other religions ???
One of the fundamental tenets of Islam is to destroy every other religion, not respect it.
Unfortunately, there will be no shortage of Muslim arse kissing and foot washing Brits that will be howling with delight and praising this liar´s Taqqiya.
Michael Copeland says
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam, never will it be accepted of him;”
Koran 3:85, part of Islamic law.
Michael Copeland says
“It is unbelief (kufr) to hold that the remnant cults now bearing the names of formerly valid religions such as Christianity and Judaism are acceptable…”
Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, w4.
linnte says
British folks need to make their freedom based beliefs(as beliefs they ARE) a religion. The Religion of Freedom. That would help to put the screws to his claim and force his true feelings out into the open.
Jay Boo says
OFF TOPIC
Obama to is within minutes to speak.
Watch in disgust or at least for comic relief.
The search for —– A MOTIVE continues ………………………………..
Demsci says
Umer KHan:“Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”.
Sure enough he is bound to argue that the will also protect OTHER THAN Islamic cultures, religions or traditions from “offendng”. But he just doesn’t understand or acknowledges the most Important Western tradition about freedom of speech.
Also he myopucally does not see the greater contextdimensions, or treachderously hypocritically ignores it.
– He is in UK, He cannot control the whole world. which resembles a huge global interconnected village by now. So, In a world with competitive curltures, religions, traditions he should not even want to try to curtail those under UK’s laws/ control, while leaving free all outside incoming propaganda.
– AND we are now qute sure that “the other side”, “enemy” or (friendlier); the competing culture, from Iran, Islamic world in general is also very much offending our culture, religion or tradition.
– So, conceivably intentionally, he seeks to disempower the one side (anti-Islam, pro-Democracy) while leaving unhindered the other side (totalitarian theocracy). A big mistake or treacherous goal of him.
Second; the answer to perceived or real “bad speech” is more “good speech”. And that hugely happens too but he ignores that as well, because if he takes into account
the huge amounts of support and praise!
for specific cultures, religions and traditions”, including very much Islam,
Coming out from outsiders, in general, media and government, Up to and including the praise and support for Islam coming from the president of the USA and the Prime Minister of the UK,
he would see that he only was trying to stop the negative, which, if successful, would only leave the positive narrative about cultures, religions, traditions, which would distort reality and diminish (freedom of forming) informed choice so disastrously
If a person wants to curtail the negative judgement of cultures, religions, traditions, why don’t they then also support the curtailment of excessive praise and support for them?!
awake says
UK Muslim police chief…full stop. No need to read any further.
Guest says
There’s no such thing as hate speech. If you don’t like what someone is saying don’t listen to them.
Mubarak says
If a religion and a culture is nothing but one big mockery and a Stockholm syndrome as large as a continent, it might be appropriate to mock its adherents out of their socks. Islam, if any religion, turns its practitioners into reciting parrots and mechanical puppets in a tour de force never seen in history. That’s why Muslims are so sensitive to caricatures of their prophet: the honesty is too much, the picture presents truth and reality, and that is not tolerated but resisted with fury and terror.
But it is necessary that offense comes also to Muslims, if their mind-numbing propaganda and superstition is to be challenged.
Charlie in NY says
If he really believes what he says, then he will be rounding up all the imams who quote the Christian and Jew hating or demeaning passages in the Qur’an and hadiths during their sermons. Perhaps he may go so far as to round up those who carry signs about Islam being destined to rule.
A main part of the criminal law revolves around the concept of notice, so perhaps this gentleman can create a hate and offense-free version of Muslim scriptures or at least identify all the passages that are out of bounds. While he’s at it, he could have a go at Hamas’ Charter as well.
He could try to do the same with Jewish and Christian scriptures, but since neither singles out any currently existing groups for slaughter, tax, humiliation, oppression or second-class citizenship, reviewing those books should be rather quick work.
Terry Gain says
Okay. Arrest those who blaspheme Christ by denying his divinity or outrageously claiming he is a prophet of Islam.
Champ says
Even the Truth about islam offends muslims. Too bad.
Mark Brunner says
Typical muslim, shouldn’t be allowed in the Police.
Laughing at idiots says
He says that “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition” He is WRONG!!! Freedom of speech means that I CAN offend culture, religion or tradition. He is saying that he wants to restrict OUR freedom of speech to insult anything he holds dear.
Janeatte says
Sometimes I thought the Muslims they live in the west will learn some of their culture, and behave like one of them. This guy said the freedom of speech will offend Muslims, first why the Muslims comes to the country wilh freedom of speech,better to stay in their country than hurt their feelings. The Muslims get offended from the speech but the screaming happily Allah w Akbar for killing someone doesn’t bother their feeling, the west has to accept it.If the deaths are their pleasure, it’s easy solution keep killing each other in their countries then all of them will be happily in their adulterous Jana with their Virgins. Muslims Don’t come to west.
gravenimage says
UK Muslim police chief: “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”
“It’s a storm in a tea cup… It’s about promoting tolerance, freedom of speech, that’s all he meant with it.
…………………………………..
So–voicing the desire to crush freedom of speech is freedom of speech?
More:
He didn’t mean for it to be taken in an offensive way at all… it’s ironic, freedom of speech is what he’s now getting in trouble for”, the press office added.
…………………………………..
Well, yes–in that case, Hitler’s rants were “freedom of speech” in just the same sense…
Angemon says
Meaning that you should be able to play the “it’s our culture/religion/tradition” card to get away with murder, and no one can criticize you for it.
Right, limiting what people can criticize is “promoting freedom of speech”…
Mark says
Muslim police chief – the ultimate in stupidity.
GIGA – garbage in garbage out
EIEO – evil in evil out
CICO – corruption in corruption out.
MARSHALL says
Keep putting these people in power, mayors, judges, police chiefs and then what do you think will happen next. A great and bloody war is coming folks…
Carolyne says
Welcome to the USA. Loretta Lynch the Attorney General of the US said, after the San Bernadino massacre that she would prosecute anyone who criticized Islam and that her worst fear was that there would be a Muslim backlash. She changed her story a couple of days later, apparently after having been made aware that this would be illegal. However, if she could, she would be exactly like the Mayor of London.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Having a “MUSLIM” police chief is the exact same as having a MAFIOSO police chief, or an open member of the KU KLUX KLAN as a police chief, or a TONG & TRIAD police chief, or even a HELL’S ANGELS police chief.
IT IS TO HAVE A PROUD CRIMINAL GANGSTER AS A POLICE CHIEF.
linnte says
Gimmee a Hell’s Angel in charge any day. I have seen those guys beat the living hell out of “brothers” who lie or go back on their word. They may be loose cannons and scary, but most bikers have a sense of honor and loyalty. I know these things ?
Jerry Howell says
If you spit at a prostitute, she is going to call it rain. You can’t offend pedophiles, rapists, thieves, & murderers, because they are programmed to shrug it off and keep doing the crap they are doing.
Mark A says
Very alarming that senior police officers are openly making these statements in public.
Freedom of speech is in great danger in the U.K.
Charli Main says
@ Mark
You are free to say just about anything you Like in the UK EXCEPT about Muslims, Islam and Mad Mohammed of Mecca.
Regardless of how true your comment about Muslims, Islam and Mad Mohammed of Mecca is ( backed by the verses from the Koran, Hadiths and Suras ) you will get arrested by the British police ( AKA enforces of Sharia on non Muslims) for ” upsetting ” the Muslims.
Pandering to Muslims and Islam is now the top priority of the British police.
linnte says
They are trying to prevent the inevitable civil war.
Jon Rosen says
he is absolutely correct.
a mature, sensible adult would recognise that freedom of speech to not be a licence to attack, mock, ridicule or criticise ANYONE ANYWHERE on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, gender, age, weight, height, sexual orientation!
ps…..remember in the Middle East, Sectarian Muslims are killing other Muslims
Stopthatshit says
YES Freedom of speech MEANS freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition