Last night I appeared on Fox News’ Sean Hannity Show discussing the Orlando jihad massacre and the politically correct willful ignorance that led to it happening.
It’s good to see Spencer on a show that reaches millions, to get the word out. Like all of you, I’m in here because I care. But we are an echo chamber preaching to our own good choir. It’s critical to get the truth out to the masses. As each new Moslem is imported, we have that much less time to save ourselves.
Myrtle Lindersays
Well, the WORD OF THE LORD ells us conditions will get worse and worse and it is the people do desire evil and those who don’t care who are making it so.
Indeed we are preaching to the choir. We need to reach the 90+ % of the electorate that is undecided on the issue of Islam. Unfortunately the media, as well as the social media, seem to work in such a way everybody gets locked up into ones own choir. We need to find new ways to break out of this circle.
Recently I discovered a website named http://www.bookcrossing.com/ . I am preparing a sticker that will also promote my website. (click my name)
If you have ideas on how to reach the electorate & want to share them, please let me know on my forum or email.
BCsays
The question Muslims need to ask themselves is “Am I a human being, do I behave as human beings are suppose to behave?” Most Muslims consider themselves Muslim first and then human beings second.
They support inhuman actions so they cannot be human beings.
Solon the lawgiver, gave democracy to the Ancient Greeks. Government of the people by the people, for the people. This was 2000 years before Mohammad had his ‘messages from god’
jayellsays
I thought the problem was the muslims consider themselves ‘super-human beings’, Allah’s chosen ones, i.e., a cut above the rest of us inferior kuffar. That would explain why they see fit to treat all unbelievers with less respect than their own kind, and since unbelievers’ lives are comparatively worthless, it’s theoretically OK to behave dishonestly and dishonourably to wards them. And despite that much-misquoted phrase from the Qu’ran, where we are led to believe that muslims apparently believe that the killing of absolutely anyone is anathema to them (wonderful thought, but the quote actually goes on to heavily qualify muslims’ responsibilities towards non-muslims, thus negating the whole idea), muslims are actually encouraged to murder unbelievers (“kill the unbeliever wherever you see them”, “strike them on the neck”, etc. etc.).
So, sadly, it’s not a case of trying to appeal to muslims’ higher sense of humanity – by OUR definition, that is. They believe that, through their ‘faith’, they already represent the higher humanity, and the rest of us just aren’t in their league. No point in arguing with them, because you’d need a battering ram to get through the cast-iron bloated ego that their wonderful religion gives them. The nearest equivalent to them would have been the dyed-in-the-wool Nazis of the Third Reich, and we all know how we had to deal with them in the end. Islam is effectively the progenitor of Naziism, and they’re playing the same game.
Berengariasays
I was very impressed with you on the Hannity Show & hope to see you in the future. Hannity should have you on often, because of your knowledge of the Cult of Murder, Islam. We are hostages of PC & you are a source of the Truth. Thank you very much.
Alarmed Pig Farmersays
Actually, he should be a paid Fox News Correspondent like Amb. Bolton, Gen. Kean and all the others. They have maybe a few dozen such talking heads, so why not Spencer? Nah, Rupert & Roger would never do that, too big of a chance of a bomb going off in the FNC lobby or a news entertainer being stabbed to death on his way home from the studio.
Jeremiahsays
How is it possible that Obama’s approval rating is still at 50%? If this continues, America is in deep trouble. If the voters think that elections are a popularity contest at which the most generous socialist can win, then we are finished. We have been running these blogs for many years and nothing changes.
We need a new approach. We need to involve people. Perhaps we need to involve people the way that the Constitution intended. There are two ways:
Voting. A rigged system gives people the gutted feeling that their vote doesn’t matter. That needs to be changed and perhaps Donald Trump will do that.
Referendum. Lawyers are inclined to make changes, even constitutional changes, through legislation. That cannot happen. Our constitution requires referendums. Referendums involve the people. Referendums educate the people. That is how it should be. We need informed voters or people will become lazy and look for handouts. For example, people need a referendum on banning Sharia. The Founding Fathers didn’t think this was necessary because nobody asked for it. Now the situation has changed and it needs to be incorporated, not in law but, in the Constitution, where it is engraved in stone.
Referendums may be run by our Veterans in a non-partisan way. This way our Veterans can continue to serve the nation after active duty. See the Benghazi committee or Special Operations Speaks PAC. Many veterans could be permanently employed in this activity, others part time.
Finally, we need separate branches of government. Not in words only but truly separate. Not all branches should be run by lawyers. Lawyers serve the law. That is what they are taught to do in law school. We need two branches of government to serve the people to balance this out. A lawyer cannot serve in the Legislature nor in the Executive. There must be a separation of thinking between the branches of government. We cannot have all three branches of government have a focus on serving the law. The law is meant to serve the people but lawyers do not understand this distinction. It is unavoidable to have lawyers serve in the Judiciary. That is an acceptable weakness if we limit the input of lawyers to the Judiciary. So we need a constitutional change to limit the administration by lawyers to the Judiciary.
billybobsays
I think the biggest need of all to to find a creative way to separate State and Corporation. What I am saying is, a way to reduce corporate influence to the point it is below the level of influence that the constituents have on government policy. That would be a whole new ballgame! Imagine every single one of those folks in Congress and in the Senate focussed on the needs of the electorate, rather than the dictates of their corporate sponsors!
Jeremiahsays
How is it possible that Obama’s approval rating is still at 50%? If this continues, America is in deep trouble. If the voters think that elections are a popularity contest at which the most generous socialist can win, then we are finished. We have been running these blogs for many years and nothing changes.
We need a new approach. We need to involve people. Perhaps we need to involve people the way that the Constitution intended. There are two ways:
Voting. A rigged system gives people the gutted feeling that their vote doesn’t matter. That needs to be changed and perhaps Donald Trump will hand voting back to the people.
Referendum. Lawyers are inclined to make changes, even constitutional changes, through legislation. That cannot happen. Our constitution requires referendums. Referendums involve the people. Referendums educate the people. That is how it should be. We need informed voters or people will look for handouts. For example, people need a referendum on banning Sharia. The Founding Fathers didn’t think this was necessary because nobody asked for it. Now the situation has changed and it needs to be incorporated, not in law but, in the Constitution, where it is engraved in stone.
Referendums may be run by our Veterans in a non-partisan way. This way our Veterans can continue to serve the nation after active duty. See the Benghazi committee or Special Operations Speaks PAC. Many veterans could be permanently employed in this activity, others part time.
Separation of Powers of the Branches of Government
We need separate branches of government. Not in words only but truly separate. Not all branches should be run by lawyers. Lawyers serve the law. That is what they are taught to do in law school. It is impractical to re-educate lawyers. It is a mindset. The law is meant to serve the people but lawyers do not understand this distinction. We need two branches of government to serve the people to balance this out.
Therefore, a lawyer should not serve in the Legislature nor in the Executive. There must be a separation of thinking between the branches of government. We cannot have all three branches of government have a focus on serving the law. It is unavoidable to have lawyers serve in the Judiciary. That is an acceptable weakness if we limit the input of lawyers to the Judiciary. So we need a constitutional change to limit the administration by lawyers to the Judiciary.
Chris Rardinsays
Robert are you anticipating being reached out to at any time by the Trump campaign and if that happens will you be willing to advise them.
cssays
Robert, you could write something about Amos Yee.
The boy went to prison because of this video.
Epidermoidsays
Gosh I enjoyed that, profanities and all. Who is this brave young man?
cssays
Amos Yee, from Singapore, he is in jail right now. 17 years old.
billybobsays
My name is Jafar
I came from afar
I have a bomb in my car
Allahu Akbar!
This funny little guy is really talented!
cssays
I watched this video at least 10 times. And what he got to endure from Muslims on his channel….
salimsays
I would like to highlight two points:
First: Our governments in the West currently practice similar kind of self humiliation on the Western people. Take the example of the DHS, which I just read, about the instructions of the DHS to its employees not to use certain words like jihad, takfir or sharia (which Muslims use freely) in order not to offend Muslims. It looks to me Caliph Omar was behind those instructions.
Second: I was taught at school that Omar’s pact was an example of civilised treatment to conquered people. I looked again today (on Arabic websites) and read a very civilised version of the pact. I kept searching, because I know Robert Spencer doesn’t lie, and I found the true full version of the pact published (albeit somewhat camouflaged ) in several sites.
This is how Islam spreads and this is how Islam continues to hold its followers – LIES !!
salimsays
Oops!! This comment belongs to Umar’s pact. Sorry, clicked the wrong button!
Georgsays
What the heck does a mosque have to be involved with to be closed? The Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge, MA attended by dumb and dumber, and a slew of other Islamic lunatics, just keeps right on operating. Aside from being dangerous and stupid, it’s just damned insulting.
Manuelesays
I SAY THAT FACEBOOK SHOULD ALSO BE INVESTIGATED AND PUNISH FOR KNOWING THAT THIS SHITHEAD SEND A HATE EMAIL AND THEY HAVE NOT INFORM AUTHORITY ABOUT IT. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
It’s good to see Spencer on a show that reaches millions, to get the word out. Like all of you, I’m in here because I care. But we are an echo chamber preaching to our own good choir. It’s critical to get the truth out to the masses. As each new Moslem is imported, we have that much less time to save ourselves.
Myrtle Linder says
Well, the WORD OF THE LORD ells us conditions will get worse and worse and it is the people do desire evil and those who don’t care who are making it so.
Red Bee says
@ Alarmed Pig Farmer.
Indeed we are preaching to the choir. We need to reach the 90+ % of the electorate that is undecided on the issue of Islam. Unfortunately the media, as well as the social media, seem to work in such a way everybody gets locked up into ones own choir. We need to find new ways to break out of this circle.
Recently I discovered a website named http://www.bookcrossing.com/ . I am preparing a sticker that will also promote my website. (click my name)
If you have ideas on how to reach the electorate & want to share them, please let me know on my forum or email.
BC says
The question Muslims need to ask themselves is “Am I a human being, do I behave as human beings are suppose to behave?” Most Muslims consider themselves Muslim first and then human beings second.
They support inhuman actions so they cannot be human beings.
Solon the lawgiver, gave democracy to the Ancient Greeks. Government of the people by the people, for the people. This was 2000 years before Mohammad had his ‘messages from god’
jayell says
I thought the problem was the muslims consider themselves ‘super-human beings’, Allah’s chosen ones, i.e., a cut above the rest of us inferior kuffar. That would explain why they see fit to treat all unbelievers with less respect than their own kind, and since unbelievers’ lives are comparatively worthless, it’s theoretically OK to behave dishonestly and dishonourably to wards them. And despite that much-misquoted phrase from the Qu’ran, where we are led to believe that muslims apparently believe that the killing of absolutely anyone is anathema to them (wonderful thought, but the quote actually goes on to heavily qualify muslims’ responsibilities towards non-muslims, thus negating the whole idea), muslims are actually encouraged to murder unbelievers (“kill the unbeliever wherever you see them”, “strike them on the neck”, etc. etc.).
So, sadly, it’s not a case of trying to appeal to muslims’ higher sense of humanity – by OUR definition, that is. They believe that, through their ‘faith’, they already represent the higher humanity, and the rest of us just aren’t in their league. No point in arguing with them, because you’d need a battering ram to get through the cast-iron bloated ego that their wonderful religion gives them. The nearest equivalent to them would have been the dyed-in-the-wool Nazis of the Third Reich, and we all know how we had to deal with them in the end. Islam is effectively the progenitor of Naziism, and they’re playing the same game.
Berengaria says
I was very impressed with you on the Hannity Show & hope to see you in the future. Hannity should have you on often, because of your knowledge of the Cult of Murder, Islam. We are hostages of PC & you are a source of the Truth. Thank you very much.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Actually, he should be a paid Fox News Correspondent like Amb. Bolton, Gen. Kean and all the others. They have maybe a few dozen such talking heads, so why not Spencer? Nah, Rupert & Roger would never do that, too big of a chance of a bomb going off in the FNC lobby or a news entertainer being stabbed to death on his way home from the studio.
Jeremiah says
How is it possible that Obama’s approval rating is still at 50%? If this continues, America is in deep trouble. If the voters think that elections are a popularity contest at which the most generous socialist can win, then we are finished. We have been running these blogs for many years and nothing changes.
We need a new approach. We need to involve people. Perhaps we need to involve people the way that the Constitution intended. There are two ways:
Voting. A rigged system gives people the gutted feeling that their vote doesn’t matter. That needs to be changed and perhaps Donald Trump will do that.
Referendum. Lawyers are inclined to make changes, even constitutional changes, through legislation. That cannot happen. Our constitution requires referendums. Referendums involve the people. Referendums educate the people. That is how it should be. We need informed voters or people will become lazy and look for handouts. For example, people need a referendum on banning Sharia. The Founding Fathers didn’t think this was necessary because nobody asked for it. Now the situation has changed and it needs to be incorporated, not in law but, in the Constitution, where it is engraved in stone.
Referendums may be run by our Veterans in a non-partisan way. This way our Veterans can continue to serve the nation after active duty. See the Benghazi committee or Special Operations Speaks PAC. Many veterans could be permanently employed in this activity, others part time.
Finally, we need separate branches of government. Not in words only but truly separate. Not all branches should be run by lawyers. Lawyers serve the law. That is what they are taught to do in law school. We need two branches of government to serve the people to balance this out. A lawyer cannot serve in the Legislature nor in the Executive. There must be a separation of thinking between the branches of government. We cannot have all three branches of government have a focus on serving the law. The law is meant to serve the people but lawyers do not understand this distinction. It is unavoidable to have lawyers serve in the Judiciary. That is an acceptable weakness if we limit the input of lawyers to the Judiciary. So we need a constitutional change to limit the administration by lawyers to the Judiciary.
billybob says
I think the biggest need of all to to find a creative way to separate State and Corporation. What I am saying is, a way to reduce corporate influence to the point it is below the level of influence that the constituents have on government policy. That would be a whole new ballgame! Imagine every single one of those folks in Congress and in the Senate focussed on the needs of the electorate, rather than the dictates of their corporate sponsors!
Jeremiah says
How is it possible that Obama’s approval rating is still at 50%? If this continues, America is in deep trouble. If the voters think that elections are a popularity contest at which the most generous socialist can win, then we are finished. We have been running these blogs for many years and nothing changes.
We need a new approach. We need to involve people. Perhaps we need to involve people the way that the Constitution intended. There are two ways:
Voting. A rigged system gives people the gutted feeling that their vote doesn’t matter. That needs to be changed and perhaps Donald Trump will hand voting back to the people.
Referendum. Lawyers are inclined to make changes, even constitutional changes, through legislation. That cannot happen. Our constitution requires referendums. Referendums involve the people. Referendums educate the people. That is how it should be. We need informed voters or people will look for handouts. For example, people need a referendum on banning Sharia. The Founding Fathers didn’t think this was necessary because nobody asked for it. Now the situation has changed and it needs to be incorporated, not in law but, in the Constitution, where it is engraved in stone.
Referendums may be run by our Veterans in a non-partisan way. This way our Veterans can continue to serve the nation after active duty. See the Benghazi committee or Special Operations Speaks PAC. Many veterans could be permanently employed in this activity, others part time.
Separation of Powers of the Branches of Government
We need separate branches of government. Not in words only but truly separate. Not all branches should be run by lawyers. Lawyers serve the law. That is what they are taught to do in law school. It is impractical to re-educate lawyers. It is a mindset. The law is meant to serve the people but lawyers do not understand this distinction. We need two branches of government to serve the people to balance this out.
Therefore, a lawyer should not serve in the Legislature nor in the Executive. There must be a separation of thinking between the branches of government. We cannot have all three branches of government have a focus on serving the law. It is unavoidable to have lawyers serve in the Judiciary. That is an acceptable weakness if we limit the input of lawyers to the Judiciary. So we need a constitutional change to limit the administration by lawyers to the Judiciary.
Chris Rardin says
Robert are you anticipating being reached out to at any time by the Trump campaign and if that happens will you be willing to advise them.
cs says
Robert, you could write something about Amos Yee.
The boy went to prison because of this video.
Epidermoid says
Gosh I enjoyed that, profanities and all. Who is this brave young man?
cs says
Amos Yee, from Singapore, he is in jail right now. 17 years old.
billybob says
My name is Jafar
I came from afar
I have a bomb in my car
Allahu Akbar!
This funny little guy is really talented!
cs says
I watched this video at least 10 times. And what he got to endure from Muslims on his channel….
salim says
I would like to highlight two points:
First: Our governments in the West currently practice similar kind of self humiliation on the Western people. Take the example of the DHS, which I just read, about the instructions of the DHS to its employees not to use certain words like jihad, takfir or sharia (which Muslims use freely) in order not to offend Muslims. It looks to me Caliph Omar was behind those instructions.
Second: I was taught at school that Omar’s pact was an example of civilised treatment to conquered people. I looked again today (on Arabic websites) and read a very civilised version of the pact. I kept searching, because I know Robert Spencer doesn’t lie, and I found the true full version of the pact published (albeit somewhat camouflaged ) in several sites.
This is how Islam spreads and this is how Islam continues to hold its followers – LIES !!
salim says
Oops!! This comment belongs to Umar’s pact. Sorry, clicked the wrong button!
Georg says
What the heck does a mosque have to be involved with to be closed? The Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge, MA attended by dumb and dumber, and a slew of other Islamic lunatics, just keeps right on operating. Aside from being dangerous and stupid, it’s just damned insulting.
Manuele says
I SAY THAT FACEBOOK SHOULD ALSO BE INVESTIGATED AND PUNISH FOR KNOWING THAT THIS SHITHEAD SEND A HATE EMAIL AND THEY HAVE NOT INFORM AUTHORITY ABOUT IT. WHAT DO YOU THINK?