While the Obama administration continues to allow the Muslim Brotherhood to direct American foreign policy and, therefore, to implement “strategies” that render America defenseless in the face of Jihad and stealth Jihad, there are some alternative strategies that have the potential to turn this catastrophic situation around completely in America’s favor.
Below are 9 concrete steps that, if implemented by a future American administration, would make a big difference in preserving our civilization and in defending Americans from terrorism:
1. Label the Enemy and Make a Threat Assessment.
The Obama administration continues to refuse to label our enemy and, therefore, it continues to enable our defeat in the terror war. It is urgent that we name our enemy (i.e. Islamic Jihad) and definitively identify what ideology inspires our enemy (i.e. Islamic law).
2. Scrap “Countering Violent Extremism.”
“Countering Violent Extremism” is the pathetic and destructive focus of the Obama administration in allegedly fighting the terror war. On the one hand, this “focus” is vague to the point of being meaningless and completely incapacitates us. On the other hand, this focus allows the administration to perpetuate the destructive fantasy that there are other types of “extremists” — who just happen to be the Left’s political opponents — that pose a great threat to the country.
For example, as Stephen Coughlin has revealed, the “violent extremists” the administration is clearly worried about are the “right-wing Islamophobes” whom the administration obviously considers to be the real threat to American security.
The “Countering Violent Extremism” is trash and needs to be thrown in the garbage.
3. Stop “Partnering” With Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups.
The government needs to stop cooperating with, and listening to, Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as CAIR and ISNA immediately. The Muslim Brotherhood document, the Explanatory Memorandum, has made it clear that the Brotherhood’s objective is to destroy our civilization from within by our own hands with the influence of these groups. Moreover, as Robert Spencer advises, there needs to be legislation that will bar all such groups and affiliated individuals from advising the government or receiving any grants from it.
4. Implement a Concrete “Countering-Jihad” Strategy.
After discarding the “Countering Violent Extremism” absurdity, a concrete Counter-Jihad strategy must become an official policy. It must specifically register that Jihadists are the enemies and that Islamic law (Sharia) is what specifically motivates them.
Most importantly, as Sebastian Gorka urges in Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, the government needs to lay down a vision, an actual “threat doctrine analysis” in a thorough document, just like George Kennan’s Long Telegram and NSC-68 did in laying out the strategic foundation to fighting communism in the Cold War. It is absolutely mind-boggling that nothing of this sort exists today in our terror war — and it is a reflection of the Left being in charge and of the destructive defeat that it is sowing.
4. Launch Our Own Counter-propaganda Campaign.
The Left and Islamists engage in propaganda 24/7. What does our propaganda war entail? Zilch.
Sebastian Gorka is crucially correct, therefore, when he recommends a national counter-propaganda campaign that involves a two-part approach: the first being the bolstering of efforts to define our enemy (Steps #1 and #4 above) and, second, the strengthening of our allies and partners in their own counter-propaganda efforts – which must include our empowering of Muslims who are trying to form an anti-Jihadist version of Islam.
Consequently, educational programs have to be set up everywhere, from public schools to universities to workplaces, in businesses and numerous other institutions. These programs must crystallize what exactly Islamic Law is and how it inspires and sanctions violence against unbelievers. This has to also involve, as Gorka urges, “a nationwide program of education that includes the armed services as well as federal, state, and local police forces and the intelligence community.”
The education campaign must also focus on the second part of Gorka’s counter-propaganda campaign, which is to help strengthen Muslims who seek to seize Islam from the jihadists’ hands.
6. Affirm Sharia’s Assault on the U.S. Constitution as Seditious.
Once the truth is accepted that jihadis are inspired and sanctioned by their Islamic texts, it must logically become required that mosques, Islamic schools and groups have to immediately curtail any teaching that motivates sedition, violence, and hatred of unbelievers (i.e. remember how CAIR advised Muslims not to talk to the FBI). Indeed, once the government discerns and labels the elements of Islamic law that threaten the American Constitution, any preaching and spreading of those elements in America must be labelled as seditious.
7. Put Pressure on Mosques, Islamic Groups and Schools.
Authorities have to start subjecting mosques and other Islamic institutions to surveillance — and discard the suicidal leftist notion that it is “racist” and Islamophobic to do so. Islamic institutions have to be made to buffer their lip-service against terror with actually doing something about it. As Robert Spencer counsels, this has to involve introducing programs that teach against jihadists’ understanding of Islam — and these programs have to be regularly monitored by the government. (This will be a part of Gorka’s suggested counter-propaganda campaign discussed in Step #5).
Spencer rightly stresses that the paradigm has to become that Muslim communities have to win the “trust” of intelligence and law enforcement agents, rather than the other way around, which is, absurdly and tragically, the case right now.
8. Bring Counter-Jihadists into the Government.
Instead of having Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers like Mohamed Elibiary serving on the U.S. Homeland Security Advisory Council (he “resigned” in Sept. 2014 under mysterious circumstances), and Muslim Brotherhood-linked individuals like Huma Abedin serving as the right-hand woman of Hillary Clinton, we need to bring in people who actually love America and want to protect it. We all know who these noble and courageous individuals are – and some of them are referenced in this article. The government must also bring in brave Muslim individuals who genuinely reject Jihad and empower them in propagating their anti-jihadist vision for Islam.
(P.S. Yes, there is an argument to be made that Islam cannot be Islam without Jihad. But the debate over this belongs in another forum. And whatever the answer, it does not mean that the effort to empower Muslims who want to make the anti-jihadist Islamic vision possible should not be made.)
9. Ridicule the Enemy.
Ridicule is a vicious and potent weapon. There is a baffling and shameful silence in our culture’s sphere of comedy, especially in Hollywood and our media, with regard to the myriad ingredients of Sharia and Jihad that merit at least a million hilarious satirical sketches.
Bill Maher, for whatever unappealing drawbacks he has in conservatives’ eyes, has set a bold standard in this respect in his Burka Fashion Show skit. American comedians need to start writing scripts that follow in Maher’s footsteps and Americans need to encourage and equip them to do so – and to also vigorously defend them from the attacks and slanders they will inevitably receive from totalitarian leftist and Islamic forces.
We must never underestimate the crippling effect of comedy on the totalitarian Mullahs of the world. Indeed, the contemptuous, snickering and roaring laughter of people, as they gaze at the pathetic rules and lives of Sharia’s gatekeepers, poses a danger to tyrants like no other.
Jamie Glazov is the editor of Frontpagemag.com. He holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the author of United in Hate, the host of the web-TV show, The Glazov Gang, and he can be reached at jamieglazov11@gmail.com.
Reprinted from Breitbart.com.

John A. Marre says
The current occupant of the oval office doesn’t want to do any of those things. I can only conclude that he is working for the other side.
Jaladhi says
A good first step to counter jihad in our country would be to get rid of all Muslims in high positions in the government as they are doing a lot to enable jihad/jihadis in the country!! The rest will follow later.
David A says
That was covered in the post. The article is brilliant and I 100 percent support every proposition in it.
There are some moderate followers of Islam. Most have had death fatwas issued aginst them. They primarily interpret the Koran as as an internal spiritual battle and death to the unbeliever as ignorance of God within the context of an internal battle, much as Hindus interpret the battle in the Bgavagita.
This view is a small minority yet strongly supporting this view In conjunction with the other strong actions and closing radical Mosqes for sedetion, would rapidly, with international cooperation, make fundamental Islam wither.
Other semi real moderates are like the current leader of Egypt, crushing the M.B. that obumer supports, and protecting Coptic Christians, unlike obumer. Essentially they are culturally Muslim, but educated beyond the barbaric ideolgy of the last empire religion of antquity. They would, with whole heart support such an Islamic reformation, as would many women within foreign nations.
Thank you for a brilliant article.
al says
Read the Qur’an and learn who these people are… and exactly what their plans are for us…
Then read our Immigration Laws…
Then see if you can find any loophole which allows any Muslim to immigrate to this Nation….
Wake up fools – if they wear the rags and follow the doctrine they are our enemy and there is no other way to say this…. Ship each and every one of them back where they came from, Period!!
Islam is our sworn enemy and can never be anything else….
sam says
Good plan! The only person who “may” do that is Trump. His winning the election is very doubtful as we are a liberal nation as of today. Unfortunately!
What a crazy world we live in. I still ca not grasp the stupidity we have when it comes to Islam.
Angemon says
That was what was said before the “Brexit” referendum. The elections are months away, but I wouldn’t trust the poll numbers. A while back someone told me that Putin had impressive high approval numbers (over 85%, IIRC). I replied that in current Putin’s Russia, it takes a lot of courage to state publicly and openly one isn’t supportive of Putin – after all, being one of Putin’s political adversaries can be hazardous to one’s health. I believe the same logic applies here with Trump supporters. In an environment where people can get insulted and physically attacked for stating they support Trump, I suspect people may find it easier to say “yes, yes, I’ll vote for Hillary”. There’s a term defining such a phenomenon: preference falsification – individuals publicly state preferences that differ from what they really want to avoid repercussions.
eduardo odraude says
I saw a report that investigated that question, and came to the conclusion that when it comes to telephone pollsters, people are not hiding their preferences to any significant degree. As I recall, part of the proof was that anonymity made almost no difference to the outcome of polling. But even if people are honest with telephone pollsters, there is no doubt that some Trump supporters in blue states are hiding a preference for Trump when it comes to what they say to friends and co-workers.
Most recent polling shows Trump up by a hair in Florida. He is well ahead in Georgia. But in all the other battleground states, polling shows him behind, from 1% to 5%, depending on the state. At the moment, things look bad for Trump. But it’s still too early.
terry says
I strongly disagree! Many of these polls are very slanted- set up that way on purpose! Think about it, if you want a pipe-dream to be the music you hear- that is what the pipe plays. This has been ongoing since DT announced his run. I do not know if he will change much or not if elected; I am voting for him because I have always, and even more so now, detested the so-called globalist ruling elites embodied in the Bushes, Clinton’s, and Obama’s. DT has done one thing no matter what, he has brought out a strong revolt against these liars, thieves, and con-artist who have been selling us out since the eighties. I for one, will never again vote for any of those who have been in office and supportive of all these false fronts. And further, I will do as much as possible allow my dollars to vote against their designs. But no matter what happens, three things I know, God the Father is on His throne; God, my Lord Jesus Christ is King, and the King will win! Period.
Jack Diamond says
some good ideas. calling the teachings of Shari’a sedition btw is essentially making Islam sedition.
—-“counter-propaganda efforts – which must include our empowering of Muslims who are trying to form an anti-Jihadist version of Islam.”
waste of time and energy. Forget reforming Islam, tell them what is expected of them. There is no anti-Jihadist Islam.
—-“The government must also bring in brave Muslim individuals who genuinely reject Jihad and empower them in propagating their anti-jihadist vision for Islam.”
Why? To influence other Muslims? They probably won’t have influence. How would you know they were “genuine” either? Not needed.
—“There is a baffling and shameful silence in our culture’s sphere of comedy, especially in Hollywood and our media, with regard to the myriad ingredients of Sharia and Jihad that merit at least a million hilarious satirical sketches.”
Not so baffling when you combine Theo Van Gogh and Charlie Hebdo with the victimology of Muslims that permeates cloud cuckoo land. Fear disguised as respect. Shameful yes, baffling no.
Jack Diamond says
not to mention the experience of South Park or Molly Norris. Result–silence.
eduardo odraude says
Fear disguised as respect, and sometimes rationalized as respect.
The problem is that PC “respect” in a sense combines with jihad terror. By itself, terror would not win for Islam, nor would PC “respect” by itself help Islam. But put PC conformism and Islamic terror together, and you have a formidable combo, which might win Europe for Islam within two generations.
David A says
See my post above, and you are not correct. You are mostly correct, but there are adequet and real chances to reform Islam and Muslims.
aaron morand says
sorry david a. no such thing…once a muzzie always a muzzie IF ever a muzzie….
Jerry says
I like this list, it’s good to focus on practical solutions to the islamic threat. Spencer and Geller, Brigitte, Wilders, and other rare souls have been doing this for years, but it seems the response has been lackadaisical where it counts most. Instead of acting on their good advice our lame politicians and media have been protecting islam with lies and excuses. Political correctness has become a religion for these traitors, they are destroying our nation(s) and heritage. We the people have a right to determine our own future, they work for us not the other way around.
I do like #6 especially. There’s a reason we have an oath of duty, for the president, the military, judges, civil servants, Congress, the police…they all take an oath to protect our constitution, it defines us as a nation and if we lose that we lose our glory. But what good is an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. if some are providing material support for advancing sharia in contradistinction to our Constitution? This isn’t just about handling pork at Target or extra long lunch breaks to pray to some demon, it’s far more deadly and inhumane than that, and of course unconstitutional too:
https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/upload/wysiwyg/article%20pdfs/Shariah_VS_Constitution.pdf
Ya know, the left is quick to condemn the 2nd amendment for gun violence. But you’ll never catch them condemning islam’s highest laws that provoke violence and death on a daily basis. Nowhere does the 2nd amendment tell people to commit violence with guns, but islam’s “constitution” commands it. This hypocrisy and moral weakness is what’s destroying the west. I got my own #10, and that’s to ensure that those who have taken that oath actually uphold it.
Jerry says
And in honor of #9 I’d like to post this hilarious Steve Crowder video even though someone already posted it in JW a few weeks ago. It’s worth watching more than once.
PRCS says
Seen this before.
Funny every time.
gravenimage says
Yes–this is brilliant!
DFD says
In his fashion show Bill Maher spoke of the woman walking 5 paces behind the man, that reminded me of a Vietnam area joke, and I have to share this with you:
A US military adviser meets a Vietnamese farmer, his wife walking 10 paces behind. The adviser strikes up a conversation, enquiring why. The Vietnamese replies that it is their sacred, ancient tradition. Which is what the adviser expected.
The adviser says: “We are here to help you into the modern age, bl bla bla, and part of this is that your wife is your equal and walks right besides you, etc.” They part with smiles and assurances.
Ten years later they meet again, this time the wife is walking 10 paces ahead. The adviser smiles and says he is glad to see that his Vietnamese friend has learned. But why is he exaggerating? She should walk at his side.
“No, no!” Says the Vietnamese, it’s alright like that, change in tradition. The adviser is perplexed, and asks what made his so very sacred tradition change into the exact opposite. “Road mines.”
Angemon says
Ha ha, I remember the first time I heard that joke. It was shortly after the second Gulf war – I’ll let you figure out the differences 😉
Johan Elzinga says
I agree with all those strategies but I’ m afraid none of this is going to happen, at least not in the Netherlands, where I live. All those strategies suppose one important precondition, namely AWARENESS. If only my countrymen could read 10 percent of what is published on this website every month… I would therefore urge everyone reading this comment to reblog links to the jihadwatch website to any friend, familymember and coworker!
David A says
I agree. However one very strong leader could adopt this platform and make it work.
Gatlinburg says
#10 Nuke Mecca
Carl says
I have to disagree strongly with this: “Sebastian Gorka is crucially correct, therefore, when he recommends a national counter-propaganda campaign that involves a two-part approach: the first being the bolstering of efforts to define our enemy (Steps #1 and #4 above) and, second, the strengthening of our allies and partners in their own counter-propaganda efforts – which must include our empowering of Muslims who are trying to form an anti-Jihadist version of Islam.”
First of all, there is no such thing as “an anti-Jihadist version of Islam. Islam is the Koran + Muhammad, and they do not come in different versions. Because they are considered sacred by all Moslems, even the “moderate ” ones, they cannot be changed. Second, there is nothing that we non-Moslems can do to “empower ” moderate Moslems against their own religious authorities.
We need to focus all our energy and resources fighting against our Islamic enemies who are inspired by the Koran and Muhammad, that is, by Islam, itself.
Jack Diamond says
Muslims are not going to pay attention to whoever we choose to promote as Anti-Jihad Muslims, in any case, we do not need to rely on this as a strategy. Effectively outlawing Jihad, including stealth jihad, and Shari’a sedition, and ENFORCING IT, (attached to our foreign policies and alliances) is to….reform Islam. Boom, we’ve reformed it. Take it or leave it. “Inshallah” they will take it (judging by their past docility when we, Infidels, have the upper hand and use it). Granted it may be too late for that, at least not before a lot more terrible bloodshed, but that is the end game of Islamic “containment.”
Jack Diamond says
As for we mustn’t do anything to alienate our Muslim allies argument, countries like Jordan and Egypt et al have their own good reasons to cooperate with us. We don’t have to curry favor with them.
David A says
The two stragedys are entirely orthogonal, and carrots and sticks are effective.
PRCS says
Unfortunately, Gorka believes we need to encourage the “good” Muslims to engage in this magical, mystical “anti-Jihadist version of Islam”. When I mentioned to him that our Saudi allies “are very good Salafist, Wahabbist Muslims”, he said we have a different definition of “good”.
About that, he is correct.
gravenimage says
Yes–there is no real “Anti-Jihad version of Islam”.
King Tut says
much better strategy. deport all muslims.
Champ says
“deport all muslims”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a meaningless idea, and the same strategy that another person (now banned) suggested, and he rode that hobby-horse for years. Yet said person *never* outlined a clear-cut plan on how to lawfully accomplish his idea to, “deport all muslims”, so I seriously doubt that “King Tut” will be able to offer a solid plan either.
King Tut says
well, we could start by deporting every last muslim ‘refugee’ who breaks the law. under Obama, we got ex terrorists working at airports. deporting every criminal will send a clear message. but i dont see that happening under this administration.
Champ says
“well, we could start by deporting every last muslim ‘refugee’ who breaks the law.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ok, but this is an entirely different idea than your initial plan to “deport all muslims.”
Champ says
“much better strategy. deport all muslims.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I disagree. Jamie Glazon has offered a solid plan that could be *lawfully* implemented.
Champ says
Glazov, not “Glazon”
Champ says
Good work, Jamie. You’ve given each of the 9 Steps a lot of thought, and it shows.
Regarding Step # 8: Bring Counter-Jihadists into the Government …I immediately thought of Robert Spencer!
billybob says
Yea – Robert Spencer for Vice President – running mate for Trump! Trump would have the very best possible advisor at his side.
Champ says
Indeed, Billybob, I like your idea! 😉
PRCS says
” It is urgent that we name our enemy (i.e. Islamic Jihad) and definitively identify what ideology inspires our enemy (i.e. Islamic law).”
Yes, Islamic law IS the ideology.
But, “Islamic” jihad?
Is there any other kind?
Why not just call it jihad and let whiney Muslims whine about it.
dumbledoresarmy says
First step is to work – more haste less speed – toward getting a ‘critical mass’ of Islamoaware and Islamoresistant citizens, so that sensible *politicians* can get elected.
Once you’ve got *that*: the next step is to STOP all further entry of identifiable Mohammedans into majority non-Muslim countries. Because… got Muslims, got jihad, and it’s *impossible* to tell the difference between the disaffected mohammedan who may well apostasise given the chance, and the mohammedan who is either already Going Jihad or *will*… or their offspring… Go Jihad in the future even if they aren’t actually doing it now.
There are countries – Turk, Somalia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, all ‘Arab’ North African countries, *all* the Gulf States, Afghanistan, – where so many of the population are Muslim that one can pretty much assume that any random passport-holder from such countries is a Muslim. Certain Christian NGOs such as Barnabas Fund can, in the case of persons from Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq or Iran, and also Pakistan, discreetly advise on the cases of persons identifying as members of the Christian (or other non-Muslim) minorities from such countries who may present as seekers of asylum or simply as immigrants.
if one were really smart one wouldn’t spell out the changed policy – that one was excluding Muslims whilst admitting, judiciously, on a case by case basis, members of persecuted infidel minorities from certain Muslim countries. It would just happen and only those doing the actual processing of applicants would know what they were looking for.
In general, one would not admit persons from OIC countries unless such persons were demonstrably members of the non-Muslim minoritiees in those countries. Identify the damn OIC as a hostile entity – precisely on a par with, say, the Third Reich during WWII, or Communist China or the USSR during the Cold War – and then consistently treat it as such. During a war you *don’t* allow the enemy’s citizens to freely enter your country en masse and settle there! You *may* choose to accept defectors but you will treat them with caution, knowing they could be ‘double agents’.
dumbledoresarmy says
The proposals made in the posted article make sense only if ‘sharia’ is being used as a synecdoche for Islam.
According to Nonie Darwish, ex-Muslim, in her book on sharia, entitled ‘Cruel and Usual Punishment’, Islam and sharia are basically inseparable.
You can’t and don’t have one without the other.
Nonie says, “to live under sharia law is to live in the world’s largest maximum-security prison” . Bear in mind she wasn’t raised in, say, Khomeini’s Iran or in Somalia or Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia; she was raised in supposedly-‘moderate’ Egypt where, *officially*, sharia was not the sole source of legislation. Nevertheless, the family and community and the whole damn *country* was suffused with Sharia; huge chunks of the way people behaved toward each other, at every level, was explicable only with reference to the Sharia.
On page xvii of her introductory section, she writes “the ultimate goal of Jihad is not to Islamize per se but rather to enforce Sharia”. And on page 23 of her first chapter she writes – “Islam now has become sharia and Sharia has become Islam”.
Jack Diamond says
Which is why calling the teachings of Shari’a sedition is making Islam sedition. That is also the quickest way to “reform Islam.” Tell them what is expected of them, or else.
Of course, one would have to be smart about framing such a policy, like one would have to be smart about framing the new immigration policy.
David A says
There is a way to radical reinterpret the Koran and entirely reject the Hadith. It has been tried by Muslims. Currently they all have death Fatwas issued against them.
Angemon says
By virtue of its many contradictions (and I’m just talking about verses contradicting one another, not logic or scientific erros), the quran by itself is useless. I mean, kudos to genuine quran-only reformers, but they picked a battle they could never win.
Jack Diamond says
It’s not our business to reinterpret the Qur’an or reform Islam or otherwise try to save it from itself. It has never reformed itself, it has only dominated or been dominated/fragmented. Rejecting the Hadith, the Sunnah, to save the reputation of Islam is going to take hold where? Radically reinterpreting the perfect, immutable Qur’an and the consensus of Islamic scholars over the centuries, is going to take hold where? C’mon.
“There are some moderate followers of Islam. Most have had death fatwas issued aginst them.” Yes, because they are considered apostates by orthodox Muslims and the consensus of scholars regarding the Qur’an and Sunnah.
“They primarily interpret the Koran as as an internal spiritual battle and death to the unbeliever as ignorance of God within the context of an internal battle.” That’s very nice but most Muslims, with good reason, do not. Jihad and especially qital, killing and slaughter, are interpreted quite literally, just as Muhammad quite literally launched warfare, raids, conquered, looted, enslaved, killed, beheaded, ordered open-ended war against unbelievers to kill, convert, or subjugate them. And founded a militant state, not a house of meditation.
You know, if Muslims want to interpret Islam the way you think they should, that’s fine. There is zero evidence our supporting this view is going to make Islam “wither.” It’s like thinking the Muslim world pays attention to Obama or Cameron’s opinion on what Jihad is or who is a legitimate jihadist or what true Islam is. Yes, there may be a lot of Muslims who barely practice Islam. So what? That’s quite different from there existing a Moderate Islam.
Our business is protecting ourselves from jihad (and shari’a) and containing and defanging the Muslim world from doing us harm. We don’t need to lead an Islamic Reformation (which they’ve arguably already had with the return to “fundamentalism”). There are many, many things we should do but this is not one of them.
gravenimage says
Also, the Qur’an itself is hideously violent. It is not just the Hadith and Sirs that is the problem.
Bob says
It’s not propaganda if it’s the truth. The word “propaganda” should be replaced with the truth about Islam. Expose Muhammad for the mad man he really was.
Johan Elzinga says
Jack Diamond and others make valid points here. My point is that this discussion should not remain on this website. Odds are that the readers of this forum are amongst the very few even discussing these pressing issues. Please let us all start to post our comments on online newspaper response sections!
UNCLE VLADDI says
Combatting islam requires fighting fire with fire:
Islam says:
1) Extort infidels into “reverting” to islam.
2) Enslave infidels who refuse to revert.
3) Murder those who resist the slavery.
…. SO, obviously, we must:
1). Educate liberals about islam.
2) Arrest liberals who refuse to learn.
3) Execute liberals who resist arrest.
Because without their libertine “liberal” criminal enablers, backwards,
savage islam could have no hold on any part of Western civilization.
LB says
Hmm… Although I’m not against “reforming islam”, at the same time I’m not sure how it is doable. I’m no expert on the matter like Robert Spencer is, but I’m pretty sure that Islam is based on Muhammad’s conquest through sectarian mentality of a religion in order to conquer the world through war, by twisting and perverting the two already existing religions — Judaism and Christianity. Qu’ran is basically a war manual.
So in order to “reform islam”, you’d have to almost completely REWRITE IT, which to me seems like wasted effort. Besides, even if someone eventually did it, there’s no way to rewrite the 1400 years of stagnation, inbreeding and brainwashing of (most of) muslim societies.
But as I said, I’m not against it. Wasted effort though it may be, if it helps combat the conventional, fanatical islam of today even just a little bit, I’m all for it!
Dacritic says
I don’t think Islam can be reformed. If it is, it is not Islam, the religion that Muhammad founded. It could be some other religion, given some other name, but NOT Islam. Islam calls for the violent subjugation of non Muslims where and when it is in power, an example set by the prophet himself. Period.
Islamorefugee says
Reforming islam can and should never be a business for a non-muslim.The non-muslim is only concerned about it since islam is out to enslave and kill him ,if he doesn’t allow it to enslave him. So it is a war,and nothing less than a worldwide war of supremacy for islam against the so called ‘non-believer'(please note the negative nomenclature for a person who doesn’t care for it. Islam has the most notorious ways of giving its adversaries bad names. It comes from the Arab desert culture,and is embedded in islam like so many other despicable principles and practices of islam ).The non- muslim world is, in fact, ‘Dar-ul-Harb’ ie. the land of war, and it is a sin for a mohamadan to live there.So their ‘prophet’ forces them ever to be in war with that people ,in any and every way the muslims have command over, with deception as the first weapon ( ‘war is deception : mohamad ).They are to make the whole world what islamist call ‘Dar-ul-Islam’,ie. the world of islam.
So we are at war ,whether we like it or know it . Muslims have been all commanded by their god ,allah, via mohamad, to wage it as their very first ‘religious’ duty. The way they do it is :’ jihad in the way of allah’ ,as they put it ‘religiouly’.
So ,no act of appeasement or coaxing will do. We have to get into it ,today or tomorrow. It is just a matter of time, if islam has come to our lands.
And we have the “left liberals” to make the matter worse ,because cancer is the deadliest of all deseases as it comes from within .
We have to be doubly strong because the defeat in this civilisational war has only one outcome : EXTINCTION !!! Either islam has to go, or the free people ,whom islam calls ‘kafir’,the despicable.
ISLAM IS VIRULENT !!!!!!!!!
And we are now left with no option . WE MUST WIN AGAINST ISLAM .
gravenimage says
9 Steps to Successfully Counter Jihad
…………………….
All good stuff. Thank you, Jamie Glazov