You would think that university professors would avoid what Western non-Muslim authorities would have us believe is a misunderstanding of Islam. Yet they do not. Now, why is that?
“Scores of educators held for inciting terrorism in Bangladesh,” by Sumon Corraya, Asia News, July 15, 2016:
Dhaka (AsiaNews) – Bangladeshi police have discovered that dozens of university professors and high school teachers have been inciting their students to engage in Islamic terrorism.
One English teacher is quoted by a school caretaker as saying that ““Muslims are being persecuted around the world, so let us attack non-Muslims”.
“When attacks against religious minorities occur, many Muslims are happy to know that Christians or Hindus are killed by the militants. Teachers are making a big mistake,” the school caretaker, anonymous for security reasons, told AsiaNews.
After the tragic terror attack against the Holey Artisan Bakery Café in Dhaka that killed 20 people, mostly foreigners, the police have increased checks.
In recent weeks, the authorities have received dozens of complaints about missing young people, who, in all probability, have run off to join Islamic militants.
At present, law enforcement is focusing on those who might have inspired such behaviour and other violent actions, preachers and teachers, like Hasnat Karim, a former professor at Dhaka’s North South University (NSU) in Dhaka….
The NSU is one of the foremost private colleges in the capital and experts believe that its administrators have never paid much attention to terror activities on the campus.
A few days ago, the commission of inquiry set up by the government seized several books praising jihad in the NSU library.
The authorities also traced several professors who have taught that it was OK to fight against the infidels. Four are working at private universities and four at English-language high schools in the capital and a public university in Chittagong.
The source reports that a professor from Gulshan (the diplomatic district where the recent attack occurred) encouraged his students to attack non-Muslims.
Even a high school teacher, the mother of a young man who joined the ranks of the illegal Islamic group Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), was found to have encouraged such violence.

Hindu American says
Surely there must be a mistake. “Educated” muslims do not incite hatred.
Biff says
It’s not hatred. They are saving us by killing us.
They love us that much.
If they did not love you they would let you live as an infidel.
Biff says
Ban guns
Need to ban the Koran.
The power and use of both can be so easily misunderstood.
LR says
Biff,
I hope you have a really good job where your co-workers appreciate your most ‘delicate’ humour. I’m sure this is not the only place you display it so well. : )
harpertwo says
You’re correct they most likely belong to some other religion, Baptists or Quakers. Etc. Besides Islam is the religion of peace just ask any Muslim or Imam or Liberal.
biff says
Harper, you my man.
José Cícero Honorato says
Perece com o que ocorre no comunismo
Angemon says
Translation: It seems what happens with communism.
Ian H says
Left wing academics – Bangladesh style.
gravenimage says
Bangladesh: University profs inciting students to “attack non-Muslims”
………………….
This should surprise no one.
God, I hate Islam.
harpertwo says
I’m positive the true God hates Islam as well, Muhammad’s anti-Christ religion is one hundred eighty degrees from what Jesus taught. Muhammad taught Hate and War Jesus taught Love and Peace.
LR says
Good on that caretaker ‘squealing’…Bangladesh is having such a hard time trying to stay politically secular. I can only wish them well.
In the news today…Imam so and so, stating Islam is a religion of peace and…
These Bangladeshi Profs. didn’t get the memo.
A lot of people are not getting the memo it seems.
citycat says
Not just here and there but in each country the Muslims are more aware of the war than are the infidels.
Maybe it could be balanced, countered, if infidels were a community of independent individuals, each with their own awareness and kung fu and other skills, each member being free to act as necessary for self defence, and assist others when necessary. Like the EU could transform into such a thing, and each country can be individually free to act, instead of having fixéd fluffy cloudy phobia restraints that are nice for Islam.
some hope, the pestilence creeps anyway it can.
The world has to wise up in all areas of trickery.
Communication is compromized.
The BBC seems to be putting out some tortured truth propaganda that is against individualism, but without individualism their mushy universalism will become as slime absorbed by Earth.
People have to become communally aware, and wise up, 24/7, like Islam.
sham says
Prohibit killing non Muslim with peace agreement:
8: 72. Verily, those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard and fought with their property and their lives in the Cause of Allah as well as those who gave (them) asylum and help, – these are (all) allies to one another. And as to those who believed but did not emigrate (to you O Muhammad SAW), you owe no duty of protection to them until they emigrate, but if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them except against a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance, and Allah is the All-Seer of what you do.
9: 4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term. Surely Allah loves Al- Mattaqûn
4: 90. Except those who join a group, between you and whom there is a treaty (of peace), or those who approach you with their breasts restraining from fighting you as well as fighting their own people. Had Allah willed, indeed He would have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they withdraw from you, and fight not against you, and offer you peace, then Allah has opened no way for you against them.
91. You will find others that wish to have security from you and security from their people. Every time they are sent back to temptation, they yield thereto. If they withdraw not from you, nor offer you peace, nor restrain their hands, take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them. In their case, We have provided you with a clear warrant against them.
Killing non Muslim /injuring non Muslim must pay blood money:
Malik :: Book 43 : Hadith 43.15.8
ahya related to me from Malik that he heard that Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz gave a decision that when a jew or christian was killed, his blood-money was half the blood-money of a free muslim.
Malik said, “What is done in our community, is that a muslim is not killed for a kafir unless the muslim kills him by deceit. Then he is killed for it.”
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said that Sulayman ibn Yasar said, “The blood-money of a magian is eight hundred dirhams.”
Malik said, “This is what is done in our community.”
Malik said, “The blood-monies of the jew, christian, and magian in their injuries, is according to the injury of the muslims in their blood-moneys. The head wound is a twentieth of his full blood-money. The wound that opens the head is a third of his blood-money. The belly-wound is a third of his blood-money. All their injuries are according to this calculation.”
Malik :: Book 43 : Hadith 43.16.8
gravenimage says
More spam from sham:
Prohibit killing non Muslim with peace agreement:
8: 72. Verily, those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard and fought with their property and their lives in the Cause of Allah as well as those who gave (them) asylum and help, – these are (all) allies to one another. And as to those who believed but did not emigrate (to you O Muhammad SAW), you owe no duty of protection to them until they emigrate, but if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them except against a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance, and Allah is the All-Seer of what you do.
……………………………
Actually, this is not about protecting Infidels at all–instead, it is syaing that even Muslims who are not Jihadists are fair game for violence.
More:
9: 4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
……………………………
This is not about Infidels who have a treaty with a Muslim state–this is about Infidels living in dhimmitude in a Muslim state.
More:
Killing non Muslim /injuring non Muslim must pay blood money:
Malik :: Book 43 : Hadith 43.15.8
ahya related to me from Malik that he heard that Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz gave a decision that when a jew or christian was killed, his blood-money was half the blood-money of a free muslim.
Malik said, “What is done in our community, is that a muslim is not killed for a kafir unless the muslim kills him by deceit. Then he is killed for it.”
……………………………
And here the vile sham shows that the second-class status of Infidels is *codified* under Islam. *Ugh*.
sidney penny says
“You would think that university professors would avoid what Western non-Muslim authorities would have us believe is a misunderstanding of Islam. Yet they do not. Now, why is that?”
“You would think that university professors ( who are Muslims themselves) would avoid what Western non-Muslim authorities would have us believe is a misunderstanding of Islam. ( the religion of peace) Yet they do not. Now, why is that?”
gravenimage says
Is this sarcasm, Jay Boo?
Angemon says
GI, that is not Jay Boo, it’s someone posing as him. And I narrowed it down to 2 possible perps. Jay Boo should contact JW and let them know someone is impersonating him.
Mirren10 says
How is it possible to impersonate someone else, using the same user name ? Even if someone has a different email address, attempting to use a user name already in existence, it comes up as “this user name already exists”.
I had to stop using “Jan” when I changed my email address, because I was told “this username already exists”. Hence “Mirren10”.
On the other hand, I’m not at all computer savvy, so there are probably ways aroind it.
Angemon says
I can think of three possible ways, although I never tried any of them so I won’t vouch for any. I won’t state them here as not to give ideas to other people. This is not the first time we had an impersonation of a regular, though. If you subscribed to this thread:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/obama-watched-the-nfl-playoffs-instead-of-attending-the-paris-march-for-victims-of-jihad
and still have the notification emails, you’ll notice that someone impersonated Robert Spencer in the comment section. For now, I’ll just say: hover over the fake Jay Boo username on this page and you’ll see there’s a link in it. Go back to something Jay Boo posted and do the same. No link:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/07/machete-attack-foiled-at-nice-vigil-where-mourners-were-praying-for-dead#comment-1480848
Mirren10 says
Angemon here – testing. If this works and I’m posting as “Mirren10”, please don’t ban me, marc/Robert – it’s a proof of concept only and not a genuine attempt to pass as someone else.
Mirren10 says
A proof of concept, I’ll add, replying to Mirren10’s July 19, 2016 at 7:41 am post, where she asks “How is it possible to impersonate someone else, using the same user name ?”.
P.S.: Still Angemon here, not trying to impersonate Mirren10 – please don’t ban me 🙂
Jay Boo says
Yes Angemon is correct
I also notice that link and advise no one to click on it
I have no website so anything with a link is automatically a fraud.
I just changed my password
I hope that is enough to hold off Islam’s slivering Serpent of Satan minions.
Angemon says
A good precaution, changing your password every so often, although I doubt the perp got access to your account. Like I said, contact the staff and let them know someone is trying to pass as you – freedom of speech does NOT cover impersonation.
Mirren10 says
I’m not going to ask how you did it, me. 🙂
Angemon says
Ha ha, rest assured, Mirren, it required no access to your JW account or email – although, like I told Jay Boo, changing your password every so often is a sound security precaution.
Klaas de Bakker says
You are making a crucial mistake and you are walking straight into their trap. “We” are not killing muslims for being muslims. I am not denying that “we” have done many terrible things sometimes out of self-interest, and sometimes out of naive and misguided understanding of the region. The Irak war is the most despicable recent example. But even in that war killing muslims was not the objective, not officially and not even unofficially. In a war in Iraq it is inevitable that muslims are killed, but that was never the goal. Indeed, most muslims in Iraq were killed by muslim-against-muslim violence.
But “they” want to kill non-muslims JUST for being non-muslims. They divide the world into muslim land and the rest, and if any muslim dies anywhere for any reason this is considered sufficient reason to kill any non-muslim, anywhere. Even if a muslim is killed by Isis they fabricate the lie that Isis is a US/Zionist invention.
Even without any western interference the islamic world would have been the same bloody mess it is today. There is plenty of evidence for that. Iran destroyed itself after kicking out that Shah (who was indeed an American puppet). Afghanistan, Libya and Iraq had their opportunities to build stable states, even with Sharia law in their constitution, but they screwed up. On the other hand, Americans also bombed Europe in 1945, but Europeans managed to build a stable region after that, with democracy and human rights. Europeans are still grateful to the Americans for their intervention.
Although the islamic caliphate had a head start on Europe during the so-called golden age, and despite the oil revenue, the muslims managed to turn all the land they have conquered into the bleeding ulcer of the world. It is a pity that colonialism and western interference have tainted the evidence, so now they can try to blame their misery on us. But even in the absence of interference they would have invented a western complot to explain their own failure. They are incapable of self-criticism, because all they actions are based on Islam and Islam cannot be wrong. That is why it always has to be someone else’s fault.
Never walk into this trap. It is not our fault, it is theirs. As long as they do not see that, they will never fix it.
bernie says
A quote:
“Yes, our drone strikes do sometimes accidentally kill innocent people, and yes, this does undoubtedly create new enemies for the West and general and for the United States in particular. However, we would not need to drop a single bomb on Afghanistan or anywhere else, if there were not a death cult of devout, extremist Muslims who are making life miserable for millions of innocent people, and posing an unacceptable threat of violence against open societies.”
bernie says
Another quote:
“Regardless of what you think about George W. Bush or his policies or Bill Clinton and his own policies, there is no reason to believe that either man would have killed or injured a single innocent person in Iraq or Somalia if they had had ‘perfect weapons’ which could limit collateral damage to specific objectives. On the other hand, what would Osama bin Laden have done with ‘perfect weapons’? What would Saddam Hussein have done? What would Hitler have done? They would have used them rather differently.”
Angemon says
B-b-b-but, most muslims in the aren’t killing non-muslims, therefore they don’t actually support such ideas! Moderates! Tiny Minority of Extremists! /sarc. off
Jay Boo says
Now you are being too obvious troll imposter of Jay Boo