Trump is right: “The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed” Khizr Khan’s son, but Khizr seems much more worked up about Trump than about jihad terror.
And jihad terror has nothing to do with Islam? Really? We constantly are told this, but the repetition doesn’t make it true.
In the first place, jihadis repeatedly make clear that they think what they’re doing has everything to do with Islam:
“Jihad was a way of life for the Pious Predecessors (Salaf-us-Salih), and the Prophet (SAWS) was a master of the Mujahideen and a model for fortunate inexperienced people. The total number of military excursions which he (SAWS) accompanied was 27. He himself fought in nine of these; namely Badr; Uhud, Al-Muraysi, The Trench, Qurayzah, Khaybar, The Conquest of Makkah, Hunayn and Taif . . . This means that the Messenger of Allah (SAWS) used to go out on military expeditions or send out an army at least every two months.” — Abdullah Azzam, co-founder of al-Qaeda, Join the Caravan, p. 30
“If we follow the rules of interpretation developed from the classical science of Koranic interpretation, it is not possible to condemn terrorism in religious terms. It remains completely true to the classical rules in its evolution of sanctity for its own justification. This is where the secret of its theological strength lies.” — Egyptian scholar Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd
“Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims. Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.” — Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow 9/11 defendants
“Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad. We only fulfil God’s orders. Only jihad can bring peace to the world.” — Taliban terrorist Baitullah Mehsud
“Jihad, holy fighting in Allah’s course, with full force of numbers and weaponry, is given the utmost importance in Islam….By jihad, Islam is established….By abandoning jihad, may Allah protect us from that, Islam is destroyed, and Muslims go into inferior position, their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligation and duty in Islam on every Muslim.” — Times Square car bomb terrorist Faisal Shahzad
“So step by step I became a religiously devout Muslim, Mujahid — meaning one who participates in jihad.” — Little Rock, Arkansas terrorist murderer Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad
“And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives, and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for Jihad.” — Texas terrorist bomber Khalid Aldawsari
All of these, of course, may be dismissed as “extremists,” although they were also all devout Muslims who were determined to follow their religion properly. One finds the same thing, however, when one turns to the authoritative sources in Sunni Islam, the schools of Sunni jurisprudence (madhahib):
Shafi’i school: A Shafi’i manual of Islamic law that was certified in 1991 by the clerics at Al-Azhar University, one of the leading authorities in the Islamic world, as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy, stipulates about jihad that “the caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax.” It adds a comment by Sheikh Nuh “˜Ali Salman, a Jordanian expert on Islamic jurisprudence: the caliph wages this war only “provided that he has first invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)…while remaining in their ancestral religions.” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o9.8).
Of course, there is no caliph today, and hence the oft-repeated claim that Osama et al are waging jihad illegitimately, as no state authority has authorized their jihad. But they explain their actions in terms of defensive jihad, which needs no state authority to call it, and becomes “obligatory for everyone” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o9.3) if a Muslim land is attacked. The end of the defensive jihad, however, is not peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims as equals: ‘Umdat al-Salik specifies that the warfare against non-Muslims must continue until “the final descent of Jesus.” After that, “nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent” (o9.8).
Hanafi school: A Hanafi manual of Islamic law repeats the same injunctions. It insists that people must be called to embrace Islam before being fought, “because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith.” It emphasizes that jihad must not be waged for economic gain, but solely for religious reasons: from the call to Islam “the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war.”
However, “if the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax [jizya], it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do.” (Al-Hidayah, II.140)
Maliki school: Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a Maliki legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation to gain power over other nations.”
Hanbali school: The great medieval theorist of what is commonly known today as radical or fundamentalist Islam, Ibn Taymiyya (Taqi al-Din Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, 1263-1328), was a Hanbali jurist. He directed that “since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought.”
This is also taught by modern-day scholars of Islam. Majid Khadduri was an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown. In his book War and Peace in the Law of Islam, which was published in 1955 and remains one of the most lucid and illuminating works on the subject, Khadduri says this about jihad:
The state which is regarded as the instrument for universalizing a certain religion must perforce be an ever expanding state. The Islamic state, whose principal function was to put God’s law into practice, sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world….The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state. (P. 51)
Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Assistant Professor on the Faculty of Shari’ah and Law of the International Islamic University in Islamabad. In his 1994 book The Methodology of Ijtihad, he quotes the twelfth century Maliki jurist Ibn Rushd: “Muslim jurists agreed that the purpose of fighting with the People of the Book…is one of two things: it is either their conversion to Islam or the payment of jizyah.” Nyazee concludes: “This leaves no doubt that the primary goal of the Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of Allah through jihad, and the option of poll-tax [jizya] is to be exercised only after subjugation” of non-Muslims.
All this doesn’t sound like a religion that has nothing to do with terrorism. And then there are the many passages of the Qur’an exhorting Muslims to commit acts of violence:
2:191-193: “And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they expelled you; persecution is more grievous than slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight you there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such is the recompense of unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no enmity save for evildoers.”
4:89: “They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of Allah; then, if they turn their backs, take them, and slay them wherever you find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper.”
5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement.”
5:38: “And the thief, male and female: cut off the hands of both, as a recompense for what they have earned, and a punishment exemplary from Allah; Allah is All-mighty, All-wise.”
8:12: “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!”
8:39: “Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things they do.”
8:60: “Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to terrify thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged.”
9:5: “Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.”
9:29: “Fight those who believe not in Allah and the Last Day and do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled.”
9:111: “Allah has bought from the believers their selves and their possessions against the gift of Paradise; they fight in the way of Allah; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise binding upon Allah in the Torah, and the Gospel, and the Koran; and who fulfils his covenant truer than Allah? So rejoice in the bargain you have made with Him; that is the mighty triumph.”
9:123: “O believers, fight the unbelievers who are near to you; and let them find in you a harshness; and know that Allah is with the godfearing.”
47:4: “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then, when you have made wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds; then set them free, either by grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads. So it shall be; and if Allah had willed, He would have avenged Himself upon them; but that He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will not send their works astray.”
To be sure, there are some tolerant verses in the Qur’an as well — see, for example, sura 109. But then in Islamic tradition there are authorities who say that violent passages take precedence over these verses. Muhammad’s earliest biographer, an eighth-century Muslim named Ibn Ishaq, explains the progression of Qur’anic revelation about warfare. First, he explains, Allah allowed Muslims to wage defensive warfare. But that was not Allah’s last word on the circumstances in which Muslims should fight. Ibn Ishaq explains offensive jihad by invoking a Qur’anic verse: “Then God sent down to him: ‘Fight them so that there be no more seduction,’ i.e. until no believer is seduced from his religion. ‘And the religion is God’s’, i.e. Until God alone is worshipped.”
The Qur’an verse Ibn Ishaq quotes here (2:193) commands much more than defensive warfare: Muslims must fight until “the religion is God’s” — that is, until Allah alone is worshipped. Ibn Ishaq gives no hint that that command died with the seventh century.
The great medieval scholar Ibn Qayyim (1292-1350) also outlines the stages of the Muhammad’s prophetic career: “For thirteen years after the beginning of his Messengership, he called people to God through preaching, without fighting or Jizyah, and was commanded to restrain himself and to practice patience and forbearance. Then he was commanded to migrate, and later permission was given to fight. Then he was commanded to fight those who fought him, and to restrain himself from those who did not make war with him. Later he was commanded to fight the polytheists until God’s religion was fully established.”
In other words, he initially could fight only defensively — only “those who fought him” — but later he could fight the polytheists until Islam was “fully established.” He could fight them even if they didn’t fight him first, and solely because they were not Muslim.
Nor do all contemporary Islamic thinkers believe that that command is a relic of history. According to a 20th century Chief Justice of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh ‘Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid, “at first ‘the fighting’ was forbidden, then it was permitted and after that it was made obligatory.” He also distinguishes two groups Muslims must fight: “(1) against them who start ‘the fighting’ against you (Muslims) . . . (2) and against all those who worship others along with Allah . . . as mentioned in Surat Al-Baqarah (II), Al-Imran (III) and At-Taubah (IX) . . . and other Surahs (Chapters of the Qur’an).” (The Roman numerals after the names of the chapters of the Qur’an are the numbers of the suras: Sheikh ‘Abdullah is referring to Qur’anic verses such as 2:216, 3:157-158, 9:5, and 9:29.)
How does Khizr Khan explain all that? He doesn’t — and he knows that no one in the mainstream media will ask him to.
“Muslim Dad Khizr Khan Tells CNN Terror ‘Has Nothing to Do with Islam,’” by Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart, July 31, 2016:
Khizr Khan, the bereaved father of fallen soldier Capt. Humayun Khan who attacked Donald Trump last week in a speech at the Democratic National Convention, told CNN’s Jim Acosta Sunday morning that terror has “nothing to do with Islam.”
Here is Khan’s full quote (emphasis added):
In addition to this, there was in the speech that my good wife asked me to refrain from saying, I wanted to say we reject all violence. We are faithful, patriotic, undivided loyalty to this country. We reject all terrorism. She asked me not to say that because that was not the occasion for such a statement. We say to his ignorance, I address his ignorance, that the dirt effect, the most effect of the menace of terrorism have been Muslims in the world, Muslims hate this menace of terrorism as much as any other place. It is our duty to keep this country, our country, beautiful country, safe. We have always thought of [it] that way, we will continue to do our part to keep it safe and beautiful. What he cites in the name of Islam, and all that — that is not Islam at all! I wish he would have, somebody would have put something in his head that these are terrorists, these are criminals, these folks have nothing to do with Islam.
Khan also asked Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan to “repudiate” Trump, calling it a “moral obligation” and warning that failing to do so would be a “burden on their souls” that history would not forgive.
In previous remarks, Trump had acknowledged the positive contributions of most Muslims, while focusing on the need to fight radical Islamic terror. In his speech after the Islamic terror attack on a gay nightclub last month in Orlando, for example, Trump said: “We have Muslim communities in this country that are great, and we have to form that partnership.”
Last Thursday, Khan caused a sensation at the convention when he spoke alongside his wife, challenging Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration, saying: “Have you even read the U.S. Constitution? … You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”
Khan made no mention of radical Islam, or terror. His claim that the Constitution bars Trump’s ban on Muslim immigration has also been disputed.
The media — which ignored, or disputed, a similar speech at the Republican National Convention, by Patricia Smith, who lost her son at Benghazi, followed up on Khan’s speech by challenging Trump to respond. Trump answered by questioning why Khan’s wife had not said anything — an apparent reference to the subordinate status of women in Islam — and reiterated: “We’ve had a lot of problems with radical Islamic terrorism, that’s what I’d say.”
Trump’s responses only fueled further media outrage. In a clarifying statement Sunday, Trump said that “Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country,” adding: “The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him.” He said Khizr Khan “has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution (which is false).”…
Thought_Weaver says
Have a look: https://youtu.be/dzy94uWyMfk
Mak says
TheMaskedArab on YouTube just did a wonderful 3 part series on this. His videos are well worth watching. He validates everything with proper quotes from the Hadiths that basically disprove everything this Islamic shill is saying about Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9JU55HpvRvCSb1TO2w_eDA
Islamophobia would imply an irrational fear of Islam. I think all of us fear it for pretty solid reasons!
Carmel says
I agree with this comment .
gravenimage says
Thanks for the link, Mak. First I’ve seen of these videos–excellent stuff!
Mak says
We need to be there on every front: For the people who can live with rational thought we need to provide rational arguments. Getting Muslims who don’t know Islam to see what it really holds is important.
Remember: In many Muslim lands they read the Quran in Arabic, even if they don’t know Arabic and hence what it says!
For those who are going to try to prevent counter arguments the fact that the Masked Arab has Arabic versions of all his videos can squash the notion that translation is twisting the meaning.
Finally for the Jihadi’s just hell bent on our destruction this information helps us outsmart the enemy.
خَليفة says
You can try these on google translate: you can select the Arabic text and paste
https://translate.google.com/m/translate?hl=en
الخوف من الإسلام
خوف غير عقلاني من الإسلام
If you switch language English to Arabic and translate “fear of Islam” you get the first Arabic line above. Wonder why translating from Arabic to English gives you something else?
Thought_Weaver says
Do you want to insinuate that,
1. Quran translations are not accurate?
2. The Quran can only be understood in Arabic?
I would argue,
1. Tell me if there is any single translation that you might suggest not just to us but to all those suicide bombers and would be jihadists so that they do not misunderstand Islam?
If translations are not possible and cannot be comprehended properly than why even read one? Reading without understanding is the most idiotic thing to do. And most muslims do that on a daily basis. You can stop it though. Give us the proper translation.
2. Now if you say that Quran can only be understood in Arabic than more than one thirds of the muslims would be hypocrites.
So much for the Quran being a clear message with clear signs. It is probably by your standards the most confusing book ever on the face of the earth.
jihad3tracker says
THANKS TO THOUGHT_ WEAVER & MAK — Hot linked relevant resources are always welcome! As we close the weekend, here is a relatively recent video by the brilliant counter-jihad expert David Wood, titled “Three Questions For Moderate Muslims” —
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2016/06/three-questions-for-moderate-muslims.html
I have mentioned that on JW several times. Please watch when you are not distracted or multitasking. Another concise video which David put up long ago is “The Jihad Triangle’ — explaining “radicalization” by FULLY-DEVOUT MUSLIMS who obey the violent commands of Allah..
David is an intensely committed Christian who blogs on faith and scripture, including many debates with Muslims. The blog is http://www.answeringmuslims.com, and, of course, he often gets death threats for telling truths about the Religion Of Ending Up In Fragmented Pieces.
If you have a few spare minutes, consider leaving a comment of gratitude at that website — the time and energy used to create all of those resources about real Islam do not just fall out of the sky into his lap.
rubiconcrest says
What the father says is about as reasonable as saying hydrogen has nothing to do with water. The more he talks the better for Trump.
jihad3tracker says
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA — BOTH TV AND NEWSPAPERS — ARE DELIRIOUSLY HAPPY THAT TRUMP PUSHED BACK AGAINST THIS FATHER OF A FALLEN SOLDIER. CHUCK TODD HERE ON “MEET THE PRESS” GIVES, OF COURSE, NOT ONE OUNCE OF TRUTH ABOUT JIHAD.
So, let me make a suggestion to all of you readers and commenters here, while we still have some time left in the weekend: go to the webpage of one of the leftist multicultural newspapers in a major city (Washington, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Miami, and so on), and see if one of their EMINENT ELITE OPINION COLUMNISTS is having a big weeping session about — how cruel Trump was blah blah blah.
THEN EMAIL THAT WRITER THE LINK TO ROBERT’S POST ABOVE. But be sure to make the subject line of your email something like “About the parents of that fallen soldier — in context” — GENTLE, NOT HOSTILE. Include your own journey from cluelessness to knowledge, and you could even close by saying “If you find even one inaccuracy in Mr. Spencer’s long dose of reality about Islam, get back to me right away.”
Christianblood says
Talking about the global islamic jihadists, the Paki Taqqiyah artis said:
“that is not Islam at all! I wish he would have, somebody would have put something in his head that these are terrorists, these are criminals, these folks have nothing to do with Islam”.
Tell this to the relatives of this young, poor Pakistani couple who had their legs broken before they were publicly burned alive:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2828845/Relatives-Christian-couple-beaten-Pakistani-mob-burned-death-say-d-legs-broken-stop-fleeing-wife-wrapped-cotton-d-burn-faster.html
Jaladhi says
All lying Muslims say that terrorism has no relation to Islam!! Maybe they didn’t read their Quran or it is obvious what they are!
jewdog says
Great, so now we can look forward to another four years or more of an Islam-means-peace-you-racist-pig President, assuming Hillary gets the job. I think she will because Trump’s foot-in-mouth disease may be politically terminal..
45charlie says
I’m sick of Muslim BS!
JawsV says
I can’t stand this Muslim and his fricking son.
3,000 Americans died on 9/11 due to Islam. Put that in your hookah and smoke it, Muslim. And STFU.
Christianblood says
Exactly!
The traitorous DNC, CAIR and the MSM are presenting this Paki muslim father, his wife and all muslims as victims of “islamophobia” while demonizing Donald Trump. It will be a very good time for Donald Trump’s campaign to hit back with a powerful anti-jihad add on the Forthood jihad attack which was carried out by another US muslim soldier named major Nidal Hasan and other similar cases. Someone, please advise Donald Trump’s campaign to do this now!
Nijam says
If Trump has nothing to do with racism, how Islam has anything to do with terrorism. Trump behaves like a foolish. He never win this election. America is not only for white Americans, it is for all. We Muslims, Blacks, Mexicans all untie and defeat trump. Trump need to learn a lesson from this, how a stupid will become president when he even don’t know the difference between Muslim and a terrorist. I hope Trump will never dare to talk a word about Muslims, We will finish your political career fascist trump. people who voting for Trump were Nazis, they want white America. Hillary is going to win, We Muslims live happily here without Trump. Get lost Trump we hate you.
Christianblood says
Nijam
If I were you, I would be totally ashamed for calling myself a muslim (a follower of islam) because islam is an evil cult of death, hate, suicide-bombing, stoning, beheading, discrimination, barbarity, cruelty, inhumanity, darkness, ignorance, savagery, wickedness, badness and genocidal criminality. How can you follow such an evil cult of hate and death (islam) and still call yourself a muslim without feeling any shame? What are you? You are a savage beast who has NO trace of conscience or humanity! Islam doesn’t belong to America or to the civilized world or even to China! Islam belongs to such hellholes as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia etc and it would be a great favor to rest of the humanity if you move back to those islamic hellholes and practice your evil religious barbarism like beheadings, stonings, crucifixions, honor-killings and suicide bombings and other acts of islamic savagery there in your demonic corners of the Earth. Shame on you!
Nijam says
Leave peaceful Muslims alone, if you really care about your nation go and fight with ISIS.
linnte says
Nijam, we will leave “peaceful Muslims” alone when peaceful Muslims recognize the Medinan phase of the Qur’an and remove all the ayat that are hateful to Jews, Christians and other non believers. REMOVE the hate and keep the good. REMOVE from Hadith’s all women hating inequalities! And stop trying to make all human beings worshipers of allah. We want our freedom not your horrible Shari’a laws!
Until Islam is eradicated from our country or Islam CHANGES we will fight you as our enemy!
linnte says
And it should be MUSLIMS who fight against ISIS not the USA or Europe. Muslims could stop ISIS if they fought them in the Middle East instead of running like cowards to Europe and America.
Keys says
How do you tell the peaceful ones apart from the violent ones?
Do you expect non-muslims to assume you all are all non-violent?
Those murdered in San Bernardino were friends and co-workers.
Islam is based on deceit from the self proclaimed greatest deceiver of all. Allah tells you to subdue the infidels.
Islam has no credibilty. I agree with what linnte said – fight your own non-peaceful Muslims until they are subdued and you have century of non-jihad muslims. You know that will never happen because of what Allah and Mohammad require of you.
Christianblood says
Nijam
Islam=ISIS
ISIS=Islam
eagle says
The so called peaceful Muslim is still lives by the Quran to be a good Muslim. The peaceful Muslim is simply a time bomb waiting for their Iman at some Mosque to tell him when to jihad. Anything a Muslim says to an infidel.is Taqiyya.Muslims are mentally ill. Muslims desire Sharia Law which is totally against all American values and the constitution. Muslims will not assimilate, they only infiltrate. They are the enemy of the American people and should be prevented by law from all government positions. Speaking the truth about Muslims is Islamophobic according to CAIR. Know your neighbors, you may have a Muslim in the hood. You may have to do more than lock your doors at night to keep your wife and children from the Muslims looking to rape infidel women and children. The Muslims and their followers are mentally sick. Check out your neighbors, lock your doors, get a good dog and lock and load before you go to bed.
eagle says
Nijam, there is no such thing as a Peaceful Muslim, it is like to say you have an M80 up your ass and you are perfectly comfortable with this and hope a Christian is holding the match. If a Muslim was to have the match you will be talking to Allah about your virgin blow up dolls. The Muslims and their followers are mentally sick. If Hillary gets the election it will be only through voter fraud, you will have your Sharia Law. You will loose all your freedoms you have now as a false American. Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate and destroy America from within. Check out your neighbors, lock your doors, get a good dog and lock and load before you go to bed.
Champ says
Nijam says
August 1, 2016 at 11:21 am
Leave peaceful Muslims alone, if you really care about your nation go and fight with ISIS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“nijam” is a *traitor* to ANY nation willing to fight “with ISIS”, and he’s a traitor to humanity on the whole.
Get lost lover of evil. You’re a lost cause serving an evil cause: islam.
JawsV says
Warning: Pay no attention to this Muslim’s (“Nijam”) drivel! Your IQ will be in danger of descending a few points! Warning! Warning! Danger Will Robinson! Avoid the simple-minded Mohammedan at all costs!
Angemon says
Nijam posted:
“If Trump has nothing to do with racism, how Islam has anything to do with terrorism.”
What? Please, take remedial english classes and learn how to express yourself in at least a barely intelligible way.
“America is not only for white Americans, it is for all.”
Who said it was?
“We Muslims, Blacks, Mexicans all untie and defeat trump.”
Ah, so America is for all, but not for Trump. Got it.
“Trump need to learn a lesson from this, how a stupid will become president when he even don’t know the difference between Muslim and a terrorist.”
Please explain the difference.
“I hope Trump will never dare to talk a word about Muslims,”
Too bad – freedom of speech, jackass. I guess you’re against Trump denouncing the barbarities done by your ISIS coreligionists. Tsk tsk – you tacit supporter of terrorism.
“We will finish your political career fascist trump. people who voting for Trump were Nazis, they want white America.”
Are the blacks and Hispanics who support Trump also nazis?
“We Muslims live happily here without Trump.”
Huh, you know that Trump is an *American* citizen, right?
“Get lost Trump we hate you”
How about *you* get lost to whatever hellhole you slithered out from and take your hatred with you?
eagle says
To dear Nijam. We know you hate us, what’s new. It’s been this way for century’s.. Really one good thing to mention among many, Trump is not a Muslim and doesn’t want to destroy America from within by infiltrating thousands of Muslims into America through executive order, jamming Muslim refugees into America with Democrat voting rights as soon as their feet touch the ground. Encouraging, no voter IDs. Making and breaking laws by executive order. Obama deliberately breaks the immigration laws on the books for his gain. Hillary will be another Obama, she is owned by foreign governments and the Muslim Brotherhood through her Hillary fund deposits. Hillary and Obama is all Taqiyya. Trump has a heart and a soul. Something Muslims and their followers do not have, nor do they want one. Muslims pray to Satan (Allah) five times a day. Obama says it is the sweetest sound he has ever heard. No mention about the sound his daughter made when she was born. The American people will redefine the Muslim culture so the American people can be protected. The Muslim culture is akin to a nomad group that has put together Sharia Law with some Satan rule book called the Quran as a religion. This gives the Muslim culture the right to infiltrate into a sovereign country that has religious protection and take over its government, schools, politics and culture without assimilating. This will end with Trump for president. The American people want the 10 commandments back in government. The Satan Muslim movement wants the 10 commandments removed, it happens to be offensive to them, along with the constitution and the complete American culture. I wonder why? The Muslims are here to infiltrate not assimilate. The Muslim culture is here to destroy the American culture from within. My advice to the Muslim culture will be to learn how to assimilate into the American culture by burning your Quran, give up the desire for Sharia Law and put a crucifix on the top of every mosque in America. Take catechism classes and learn the Christian way to live and God will forgive you. That means no more treating women and children like cattle and no more raping infidel women and little children, you will then become a proud infidel. Oh this too, no 71 virgins when you die. You won’t need them in heaven. This is no Taqiyya.
John Marst says
Oh, good Lord, more of this nonsense. Islamic State, at least, tells their truth, plainly and loudly. They want to be, and in many ways are, the true face of Islam. And the Islam doctrine backs them up, not the “nothing to do with Islam” folks. The jihadists won’t go to the toilet without a fatwa from some bearded buffoon.
How can an honest conversation even begin without at least acknowledging that Islam really is all about Islam? I am sorry for the parents’ loss, but can we please stop with the delusions already? I knew a fine Marine who died in Iraq and it’s a disservice to his memory.
Mark Swan says
Good Point John Marst.
Mr. Khan needs to be honest or He will never heal—His Son died because of Islam.
Mr. Khan should be ashamed of exploiting His Son’s sacrifice for the Democratic Party’s Campaign.
Mr. Trump should take His challenge, and show the irreconcilable differences between
Islam and Constitutional intent—in a brief but accurate National add.
This Mr. Khan says He can read, and if this is true and He has read the Quran, and still says He is
a Muslim—then there may be no hope for Him to heal.
Christianblood says
Mr. Khan is being pushed by CAIR and the DNC traitors to say what he has to say. This is treason. The democrats are siding with the enemy.
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“Mr. Khan is being pushed by CAIR and the DNC traitors to say what he has to say.”
Citation needed.
linnte says
Mr. Khan is a Lawyer. He reads very well. No doubt in my mind he is a member and supporter of CAIR.
Mathews V. George says
To Khizr Khan and Mrs Khan with love from a world citizen.
Mr. Khizr khan, by using your tiny ugly mind, did you ever thought how your son died ?
Using the same tiny and narrow mind did you ever thought, who killed your son ?
The Hillary Clinton who supported the Iraqi invasion killed your son. The Bushs are the one who standing against Mr. Donald J. Trump killed your son.
Not the Donald j. Trump who firmly stood against Iraqi occupation.
Your son was a part of invading thugs who murdered, butchered, Plundered, Looted and Raped a nation, its wealth and women. That too millions. By using simple sane mind anybody can come to a conclusion that your son is a killer, murderer, plunderer, looter and rapist.
Mr. Khizr Khan and Mrs Khan you are in the camp of your son`s killers.
Tony Blair, the co-producer of the Iraqi illegal invasion agreed that it was a mistake.
If you were a good father, you wouldn`t have justified the killings of millions of innocent Women, Children and elderly killed in Illegal Iraqi Invasion by siding with those killed. You would have stood with Mr. Donald J. Trump who opposed Illegal Iraqi invasion by Bushs, Clintons and Tony Blair.
You are standing with a war criminal called Hillary Clinton who as a Secretary of state invaded and destructed two nations called Libya and Syria where millions were died so far.
Remember Mr. Trump oppose every war on soil without the approval of United Nations.
Think Mr. & Mrs Khizr Khan, think. Have you ever tried to assess the damage these interventionist Clintons and Bushs did ? Millions are crying because of Clintons and Bushs.
By
Mathews V. George.
gravenimage says
The meretricious Mathews V. George wrote:
If you were a good father, you wouldn`t have justified the killings of millions of innocent Women, Children and elderly killed in Illegal Iraqi Invasion by siding with those killed.
………………………..
There is *no* doubt that that the Iraq war was handled badly–the US foolishly assumed that the Muslims of Iraq were just regular “moms and dads” who wanted democracy like civilized people.
But to pretend that the US and coalition forces there were targeting millions of women, children, and elderly people in Iraq is just grotesque calumny. We do not target noncombatants–that is what *Muslims* do.
Most of the noncombatants in Iraq have been killed by *other Muslims*.
davej says
“Nothing to do with Islam”
He must know this is untrue. So – pure deceit.
Christianblood says
Islam and those who seriously follow it are nothing but PURE EVIL and it is very sad to see how Western MSM intentionally ignores the countless barbarous atrocities being committed by muslims DAILY all around the globe while at the same time they are given voice to islamic apologists and islamic stealthy jihadists and islamic taqiyya artists like the Paki father whose only dishonest and deceptive agenda is to further the cause of islamic death cult.
Diane Harvey says
I believe that all presidential candidates, regardless of party, have read the Constitution. At 4000 words, that’s no big deal. It’s their not obeying or disregarding it that concerns me.
Michael Johnson says
There may be some peaceful Muslims but there is no peaceful Islam Islam is not a religion of peace but war and terrorism
Richard Paulsen says
Why did not TV allow the wife to say anything? He talks for his wife. She is not allowed to say anything. That is how it uses to be with muslims in the west as in their countries.
If most muslims are against islamic terror, why then have they not build an army worthy the name to fight terror and forming peaceful nations?
Just demanding from others.
Even small countries as Sweden and other small countries in Scandinavia having to send help as soldiers, money, technical help, medical help all the time and without any change, things just growing worse.
The worse for those countries helping or trying to, islam being spread into their countries as well. Muslims claiming it is peaceful.
Muslim men in other countries should train and go to fight against terror in their countries instead of others should.
The best for women and peace is no islam at all in a country. Everyone ought to be glad someone understands and want a change,
gravenimage says
It wasn’t American television that prevented the wife from speaking–most likely, it was her Muslim husband himself.
Jay Boo says
Agreed ” –most likely, it was her Muslim husband himself.”
Although we can assume that may well be true, it was foolish of Trump to actually say it and allow the option the mother to claim she was too upset to speak which is (plausible) and the father to claim that his wife had helped make many decisions on what he would say.
Mubarak says
Generally speaking it is the mother in Muslim families who has the power. She occupies and maintains this position through witchcraft and sorcery. Islam is a cloak for occultism and that is what Muslims really submit to.
Islam is poisonous and deadly and the metaphor comparing Muslims in the grip this ideology with scorpions (https://youtu.be/dzy94uWyMfk) is indeed fitting – and it is put forth by a Muslim.
Christianblood says
Mubarak posted
(..Islam is poisonous and deadly and the metaphor comparing Muslims in the grip this ideology with scorpions..)
Indeed! islam is PURE EVIL. Period.
overman says
Here he is on CNN saying [as they do ad nauseum] that terrorisim has nothing to do with lslam.
Richard Paulsen says
Caliphate News Network. = CNN
overman says
LOL, l like it.
Richard Paulsen says
Thank you. You are welcome.
tjhawk says
Khizr Khan and his wife should never be challenged on the sacrifice of their son. If he says he loves living in the USA, I’ll still allow him that. When he starts down the “nothing to do with Islam” pathway, he then moves out of the zone of sympathetic protection. He should be made to account for the specific differences between his views and those of another famous Muslim soldier, Nidal Hassan. How is Khan’s Islam any more valid than Major Hassan’s? Which one lines up more accurately with the example of Mohammed? Ask him how he accounts for this dualism in Islam.
The “nothing to do with Islam” people never get asked questions.
Johan Elzinga says
I saw his interview and Trump’s reaction. I believe that mr Khan genuinely believes that his faith has nothing to do with terrorism. From his perspective this is absolutely right. He and his son should receive all respect and all credit possible for defending his country against terrorism. However, his story is now being abused by the democratic campaign to make people think that islam has nothing to do with terrorism (“look at this poor muslim who lost his son in fighting terrorism. We are not against people like HIM”). Trump added more injury to step in this well prepared trap and started to attack this man and his wife. It is not about this man or his wife, it is about the violent islam and it’s million of seriously misled followers.
Johan Elzinga says
Oh and I forgot to mention that to my humble opinion, there is no such thing as a moderate islam. There are only moderate followers of islam, who ignore the violent parts of the Koran and the Hadith.
Max Publius says
What mosque does this sinister posturing false Great Muslim Hope go to? I’ve never seen a mosque that isn’t connected to the Islamist political wing of some genuine terrorist group. ISNA, MSA, CAIR, etc are all what I’m talking about. They are all products of Islamic fundamentalist groups deeply connected to terrorism, e.g., Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, etc.
Champ says
Wellington says
Is it really 480 times in the Koran that Mo’s hand puppet, Allah, calls upon Mohammedans to wage jihad? I thought it was a “mere” hundred or so. Anyone care to comment here because I don’t want to be guilty of underestimating Islam.
ECAW says
There are 170 or so jihad verses in the Koran, all marked in mauve here:
http://www.koran-at-a-glance.com
ECAW says
Make that 160 or so:
http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Themes/jihad_passages.html
Wellington says
Thanks, ECAW. That’s about what I thought it was, so where does the 480 come from? Overman mentioned the link that I already went to but that just repeats the 480 number with no citing by the Taliban terrorist, Beitullah Mehsud.
overman says
Robert gives a link for that quote – to another post.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/01/allah-on-480-occasions-in-the-holy-koran-extols-muslims-to-wage-jihad-we-only-fulfil-gods-orders.html
ECAW says
Madrassahs aren’t big on basic arithmetic.
Wellington says
Ah, perhaps that’s the problem, ECAW. Muslimthink, you know, does terrible things to the mind.
overman says
l looked around but there doesn’t appear to be a source. Perhaps he’s including the Hadith’s as well – even though he only mentions the koran. Mostly it will be based on the Taliban’s interpretation, l think – you could see ‘Jihad’ everywhere in that book.
Robert even has it in his book ‘The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran’, so he must believe it.
Wellington says
Thanks, overman. I would just like to be exact here. Perhaps Robert Spencer himself could weigh in on this since he’s rarely busy trying to enlighten the West about what Islam has in store for all of us. Fifteen books, speaking engagements aplenty and countless numbers of articles testify to the enormous amount of extra time he has on his hands. Who could doubt it?
gravenimage says
Wellington, here are pious Muslims making the 480 claim:
“Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad. We only fulfil God’s orders”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/01/allah-on-480-occasions-in-the-holy-koran-extols-muslims-to-wage-jihad-we-only-fulfil-gods-orders
I haven’t counted, but my guess is that the 160 number counts Ayats, and the 480 number counts individual words mentioning Jihad.
Appalling, either way.
Wellington says
I’ve already gone to that January 29th, 2007 article several times now, gravenimage, and it, as I have mentioned before on this thread, doesn’t cite any reference for this number. It’s like it’s made up out of thin air, but then Islam was made up out of thin air and so perhaps things are quite fitting here.
Wellington says
Upon second deliberation, you could very well be correct, gravenimage, that it’s ayats versus individual mention of jihad. My God, you’d think Islamic barbarians (excuse the redundancy) could at least get their hate crap down right. But they don’t even get this. But then they don’t really get anything.
Crusades Were Right! says
Watching the “Muslim Dad” talk about Trump on CNN gave me shivers down my spine. The way he clenched his fist and shook it was clearly a symbolic beating. And his words suggested to me that he was placing a curse on Trump.
It reminded me of those Muslim “clerics” I see on MEMRI TV who curse the “infidels” (Christians, Jews and other non-Muslims), the Great Satan (USA), Israel and the West in general during those lovely “peaceful” sermons they give!
Don’t be dhimmi dummies, Yanks!
Michael Copeland says
“Every Muslim is a potential terrorist.”
Former hard line muslim Nassim ben Iman.
http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/islamic-sleeping-pill
Jaladhi says
Islam is terror and terrorism come directly out of Islam and Muslims.
Champ says
Liars like Hillary and this clown “Khan” stick together, and now he thinks that he’s a big shot since he appeared at the DNC, but he’s nothing more than another lying lost cause serving an evil cause: islam.
And …
“Trump is right: ‘The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed’ Khizr Khan’s son, but Khizr seems much more worked up about Trump than about jihad terror.”
Exactly!
gravenimage says
True, Champ–he wasn’t nearly as angry about the death of his son as he is about Trump’s talking about keeping Jihadists out of the US. Very telling…
Mark Swan says
Yes a purposeful ploy, by the Democrats linked to their theme, is laced obviously in His words.
Johan Elzinga says
Saying here that mr Khan is a clown doesn’t convince anybody. In fact, you just get the opposite. Mr Khan deserves our sympathy at the very least. That is not the same as saying he is right when he argues that Islam has nothing to do with violence, though.
Rob says
He know that the violence and murder being perpetrated has EVERYTHING to do with Islam – it’s entranced in the Hadith and he’s well aware of this, yet he’s prepared to stand up for the DEM liars, despite his son’s death.
His son deserves sympathy – he doesn’t.
No-one who’s prepared to lie as he has. is deserving of sympathy or credibility. He defames his own family for the disgusting Clintons, who otherwise wouldn’t give him a second glance, if they met him in the street…
BringBackTheCrusades says
Trump’s words were perfectly fine in a sane world. The talking heads response on CNN were so hysterical it reminded me of Nazi theater. The key take away is the pro Islamic/Nazi press core is terrified of a Trump presidency as they plainly stated let’s hope Hillary’s poll numbers improve so we never have to hear from this hateful man. Go Trump!! Make e America Safe Again!!
Aron says
Martyr Khan had nothing to do with Islam or even a Muslim !
Muslims doing terror attacks and Treason ‘have nothing to do with either they being Muslims or Islam.
Then why should Martyrdom and Sacrifice by muslims for their country alone be ?
Shouldnt they say- ‘ Muslim Soldier’s Sacrifice has nothing to do with his being Muslim or Islam?
R Cole says
I don’t really get this – he seem to want to confuse Trump’s effort to secure America – with the service and death of his son.
The latter of which of course Trump had nothing to do with.
When he asked what has Trump sacrificed – it seemed to have been with some malice – that he was wishing bad on Trump.
And this is where I don’t think he should in anyway be rewarded – as he is actually using his own pain – in a form of political expression – to belittle [or condemn] Trump.
He seems to imply that Trump should feel the same pain that he feels.
This is where I think his speech at the Dems Convention crossed the line – and it is at this macabre point – it is being used to get votes — to turn people to the Democrats.
The did the dirty on Bernie – all under the pretense of holding the higher moral ground!
::
Hillary Clinton is no example of high moral ethical values.
Look at the Clinton Cash – Bill’s gone to the dark side! Listen to his opening statement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td2pyyCau30
::
The fact is this man is hurting – but what he’s likely struggling with most – is that it is a Muslim who killed his son. His attack on Trump could be a reflection of his inner struggle over who really is a Muslim. His son or his son’s terrorist killer.
What Trump wants to do – in his own way – is to keep the American homeland safe from these terrorist killers.
The Constitution says there should be no laws in regarding religion [and no religious test…] – but then there is also the safeguard that the right to life and liberty should not infringed upon.
Trump is not an experienced politician and he has walked back his ban all Muslims statement – but still maintains that those from countries which pose a threat to the US will not be able to immigrate easily to the United States.
Mr Khan should accept that if someone is allowed in and carry out a jihadist attack on US soil – taking someone else’s family member. Like Mr Khan their families will be in pain and – look to blame Trump if he is President.
Greyhound Fancier says
The Constitution prohibits religious tests for only 1) political office, and 2) governmental positions of trust. That means that anyone can run for public office, and their religion is not disqualifying.
There is no prohibition on restricting persons from Islamic countries from coming to the US as immigrants, visitors, or refugees. The Congress sets rules for who can immigrate.
Keys says
R Cole: “The fact is this man is hurting – but what he’s likely struggling with most – is that it is a Muslim who killed his son. His attack on Trump could be a reflection of his inner struggle over who really is a Muslim. His son or his son’s terrorist killer.”
Thank you, RC, for this well-stated insight. Mr. Khan knows at some level that Muslim soldiers who die, even by suicide, fighting an infidel army go directly to paradise and the 72? virgins stuff.
On the other hand, a Muslim like his son, who fights against other Muslims for the infidels, surely must go to hell and be tormented forever. A unbearably painful realiztion for the father of a beloved son. This could be part of the reason he insists these terrorists are not true Muslims thereby believing his son is spared eternal damnation.
I am sure one of the JW scholars can back that up with Islamic texts.
R Cole, you’ve got to be a student of the psyche.
linnte says
Wow! An aspect I never thought about. For sure this dad is thinking his son is in hell! Wow! That is a very painful thought. 🙁
Debi Brand says
It is all, according to Islamic doctrine, a matter of intent.
In other words, if tossing aside Qur’an and Sunnah guidance is to serve the round-about way of advancing Islam, then doing so is permissible.
However, if Khan’s said son was willingly rejecting the doctrines and teachings of “Qur’an,” and thus rejecting not only that in Qur’an but also all in hadith as well as all in regard-worthy Tafsir, then he was clearly no Muslim but an apostate.
Conversely, if Khan’s son, Humayun, was being true to the tenets of Islam, and thus, fighting only for the cause of Allah—which is fighting to make the word of Allah supreme—which is what “Allah’s” word commands all Muslims to do, then we have a “different” story here.
It then would be the narrative in the making of an Islamic soldier fighting in the way of Allah, thus, devoting himself to learn the ropes of the U.S. Military, to thus be ready, and in position, to serve as a necessary leader once we bend, in short, sufficiently, to become a nation guided solely by Islam.
Whatever the case is concerning, Humayun, one thing is certain concerning his daddy: Muslims, followers of the way of Muhammad, noting their moment of strength and opportunity, thus, step to the forefront in U.S. election 2016, set down terms on what our “leaders” should do, state, and stand for or stand against.
Curiously, speaking repeated times to Donald Trump’s “ignorance,” with respect to Islam, Mr. Khan begs all his audience likewise share in “Trump’s” alleged ignorance.
Therefore, “folks,” take Mr. Khan’s words for it, these terrorist, “these folks have nothing to do with Islam.”
http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/
Keys says
Thanks for your comments, Debi Brand. I read your comments on the link you provided in response to Glazov’s plan.
All this (an American Muslim killed in combat, etc.) points to a deadly problem for non-muslim Americans. How many Muslims are in our military; what percentage; what do they have access to, etc.
How many Muslim pilots are there? Think what damage one pilot could do to an aircraft carrier, to a ground force with a daisy cutter, etc.
The Muslim enemy knows that whoever controls the military can control the nation. Doesn’t matter how many automatic weapons the public has.
There is no doubt in my mind that, just like there is a plan to build 100s of mosques in the USA and bring in 1,000,000s (Merkel wants a mil) of muslim immigrants to fill them, there is also a plan to infiltrate the military.
These are indeed existential threats for the USA.
Debi Brand says
Thank you, Keys. for reading and for your comments.
With respect to the Muslims we take into our ranks, that in the post at the link provided below speaks in part to what “Allah” has to say of “Muslims” fighting for other than the cause of “Allah.”
In brief, I assure you, that which I provide in the post at the link below was, given Mr. Khan’s recent ubiquitousness and statements therein, a shot from the hip.
In other words, much more one could add to it forging that spoken to in the post:
Shamelessly, shamelessly shamelessly, Khirz Khan uses his deceased son as a vehicle to advance deception on the din Islam.
gravenimage says
R Cole wrote:
His attack on Trump could be a reflection of his inner struggle over who really is a Muslim.
……………….
Alas, I don’t think so. He was just asserting that Muslims are real Americans, and that anyone concerned about Jihadists wanting to kill us is not.
Joe says
It’s a common tactic of Muslims lying: First they present them as victims of others to make it emotional and then they come with the used to be lie that Islam would be peace.
Trump is right! ALL Muslims need to be vetted and like de-Nazifying the wheat needs to be separated from the chaff!
Islam needs to be condemned for what it really is: A 1400 year old ideological fascist society like communism and Nazism. Unlike the latter it has an religious receptor to sail free under the freedoms of religion in human societies to undermine them from within and implement sharia law.
linnte says
This man Khan clearly knows nothing about Hillary. And his skewed version of Liberty by looking at Hillary as the example shows he really doesn’t understand Liberty at all. But I betcha he knows his Qur’an!
JD says
FOURTEEN American Muslims killed since 9-11, and the DNC picks the father of one of these men to speak, rather than any of the parents, wives, brothers or sisters of the more than 6,000 plus American soldiers who have died since that horrific day?
Does anyone know anything about Khizr Khan?
I’ve been trying to research his background, and all I can come up with is that he (and perhaps his wife) came to the US in 1980 from Pakistan. Khizr Khan then attended HARVARD LAW SCHOOL?
Is he a member of CAIR, or any other Islamic organization?
Obama allegedly attended Harvard Law School, and exactly how did Obama travel to Pakistan in 1981 on an American passport, when travel to Pakistan at that time was almost impossible for any US citizen?
Nothing is as it seems…
Keys says
Here, here !
linnte says
Intrigue and deception is what we live with today. Makes the past seem so much safer!
Mark Swan says
JD—Thank You for some good points here.
Troybeam says
Being a Muslim he’s dictated by the Koran on what he can say. If a Muslim say’s anything thing against Islam than its simply an instant self imposed death treat.
dumbledoresarmy says
There *must* be people reading here who have contacts amongst those campaigning with and for Mr Trump.
I suggest that Mr Spencer’s introductory remarks, from above, be copied and sent direct to Mr Trump with a brief covering note.
Give him some ammo! (I am sure Walid Phares has given him relevant info, but nevertheless, reinforcements can’t hurt). And, to be frank, you should also suggest that Mr Trump should discreetly *make contact* with a/ Mr Trump b/ Andrew Bostom and c/ Australia’s Mark Durie, to back up what he’s already been learnng from Mr Phares.
dumbledoresarmy says
Oop.s
Major major slip.
For Give him some ammo! (I am sure Walid Phares has given him relevant info, but nevertheless, reinforcements can’t hurt). And, to be frank, you should also suggest that Mr Trump should discreetly *make contact* with a/ Mr Trump b/ Andrew Bostom and c/ Australia’s Mark Durie, to back up what he’s already been learnng from Mr Phares.
read
Give him some ammo! (I am sure Walid Phares has given him relevant info, but nevertheless, reinforcements can’t hurt). And, to be frank, you should also suggest that Mr Trump should discreetly *make contact* with a/ Mr ROBERT SPENCER b/ MR Andrew Bostom and c/ Australia’s Mark Durie, to back up what he’s already been learnng from Mr Phares.
linnte says
Agree! He needs info. Desperately!
Angemon says
So, this Khan guy is the next mainstream token “moderate” muslim? How long until he’s thrown in jail for supporting terrorism?
Edward says
Another muslim in need of a DNA repair…..here’s an islamic with an extra molecule…an innate delusional and a very destructive one! Doesn’t this father know that that A jihadist ultimate goal is to be martyred? This sole death wish purpose is to copulate with the 72 virgins in paradise.
Question: If a musilima is martyred who does she copulate with?
gravenimage says
Father of slain Muslim soldier says that terrorists “have nothing to do with Islam”
……………………
Islam killed this Muslim’s son, but his is still all too happy to whitewash it for the “filthy Kuffar”. This is hardly uncommon–Mohammedans do it all the time.
warren raymond says
Muslims and Moonbats have been milking the death of this Muslim soldier from day one, ignoring the multiple incidents of Muslim infil-traitors in the U.S. army solely to murder their fellow soldiers.
Where’s the list? It needs posting again.
underbed cat says
Mr. Khan can say what he said, that terrorist have nothing to to with Islam…but he can’t say that Islam has nothing to do with martyrs or jihad…that he wouldn’t be able to speak, for fear of reprisals.As many experts point out it has a lot to do with the words and audience.
John Billings says
Let me say this briefly. Any Muslim who fights for the kafir is not a real Muslim. Any Muslim who says that “terrorism has nothing to do with Islam” is either not a real Muslim, or he is a liar like Barack Obama.
underbed cat says
John Billings says:.” Any Muslim who fights for the kafir is not a real Muslim.”, which leads to the problem of green on blue shootings….after fighting alongside a kafir against the competition for the caliphate, at any time they can then “slay the infidel”. No reason for muslims in American militiary when they follow sharia and that is the opposite of the Constitution.
Kay says
My guess is that DNC found him with an intention to use him and wrote his speech for him so as to sway voters.
But bereaved father, I am sad with you for the death of your son.
Bezelel says
I was still typing when your comment was posted, and I agree about the speech writing.
Jay Boo says
Let us not forget what Hillary said to the grieving relatives of the victims of the terrorist attack at the US Embassy in Benghazi.
All the MSM gave her a free pass.
Bezelel says
If I could get a nickel for every time someone say’s, “nothing to do with islam,” I could retire wealthy. It’s becoming so predictable that you can set your watch by it. The grieving dad, in his righteous indignity, finds a softer target by attacking Trump than to admit that islam is the culprit. Besides that maybe obola will invite him to the Whitehouse. I do not doubt that khzir’s speech was written for him, perhaps by huma. And someone needs to point out to him what Jimmy Carter did to iranians.
TJFreedomjihad says
As I’ve seen this situation, (I am an unmitigated Trump supporter) Donald clearly has a way advanced (over most in DC and the general public) understanding (which is vital, and the opponent is in the tank for our enemy, understanding or not!) of many aspects of satan’s cult gang, and got himself caught through taqiyya and kitman, WAY OUT BEYOND THE IGNORANT little vicious naïve 5th column baby media and their sneaky older peer media, and the public, (also clueless), and Trump could even have used this as an educational moment of challenging the public to learn and catch up with both he, and others. It is similar to a general who takes dangerous actions with his own soldiers way out beyond, way ahead of his support base, of logistic and troop support.
Donald, the ‘general’, outstripped his main body of troop support (the general public), being far too out of touch with their understanding of the danger of the truths he placed himself in, acting a bit too aggressively, (energetic aggressiveness the mark of Patten’s and MacArthur’s and other greats), with his squad deeply in enemy territory, including specifically the DNC. And they pulled the trap, at the DNC (just as in ACAH with the infamous Gruber and Rhodes working over the unknowing gullible public), knowing how uneducated the public is, and how in the tank their media troops are, for them alone.
This is the danger that lies in wait for a charger of inherent newness in the new arena, which danger must be learned quickly. Like taking off in an airplane without finishing the whole bloody checklist, memorized or written, even if interrupted during the process. No one else can do as well, as Donald, either. The opponent is or is in the tank completely for the enemy, and no other competitor is as strong. We need his strength and brights, but he is not God, just closer than others.
As for our sadly vermin-jihadi murdered ‘muslim’ soldier, our soldier clearly is a hero, but did not apparently have his latest full briefing on how a sunnah pious muslim should behave (hassan). So in spite of his father’s loss, which said father probably DID HAVE the ‘briefing’ of pious sunnah muslims, (based upon his videoed clear lies of kitman-taqiyya, he wasn’t thank God for at least his son, and us, quite a ‘real’ full muslim. Consequences could have been worse, for the son and others. If the father does not understand the core of muslims yet, then there is a potential danger there, unless he can grip onto some reality deep in his mind’s innermost recesses or soul if or when extant, of the brainwashing of the cult-gang of satan’s deep sickness and void!
The sunnah jihadi murderers of our troop(s), on the other hand, would feel quite happy, that they murdered a ‘hypocrite’ as they, brainwashed by satanic doctrine, are ordained to do. Thus a symptom of countless ones, of the deep sickness that is satan’s gang of suckers.
TJFreedomjihad says
For those wishing to dive deeply into this Khaaaaaaaaaaaan situation, I just noticed a well citationed article in Walid Shoebat’s site, on this matter. It is no surprise, I hadn’t mentioned my suspicions of a larger possible picture than so far known, and Robert Spencer has done a typical great job of bringing critical perspective in deep detail to this important affair. But Walid appears to have some additional parts of the puzzle, to which I had referred circumspectly to in my piece preceding,.although I hadn’t known of Walid’s article, yet. See the article here: http://shoebat.com/2016/07/31/what-the-media-is-not-telling-you-about-the-muslim-who-attacked-donald-trump-he-is-a-muslim-brotherhood-agent-who-wants-to-advance-sharia-law-and-bring-muslims-into-the-united-states/
The article unfolds with copious evidence, and implies a long history by Khan with MB people and nefarious muslim organizations, and a guess who- connection to killary’s foundation! This guy is a plant, just as I thought, a trap. And things could have been worse. It is also supported as clear, that Khaaaaaaaan is a long term in the tank islamic lawyer, from Punjab, well loving sharia.
Say I, Those who won’t learn, are doomed to repeat history, over again…….!
As said at the article’s end:
…….Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject. And it has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well………
There is much more of big, big weight. This may be a very big thing the DNC played their hand on……
What part of “they will be in the House of Islam by force in the near future” don’t these democrats understand? More dead Americans?………
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBE-ywVNy_U
………But soon everything we need to know will be uncovered. As we say in the Middle East: the snow always melts and the sh*t under it will soon be revealed.
Yeah, Khaaaaaaaaaan overplayed, overexposed, his hand, with the public I spoke of in preceding posting, I too believe more will be exposed.
Many facts in this article like all of islam are damning, it needs to see the light of the public!
Jude says
I’m so glad to read your post. While I was cleaning I thought the same thing. This was a setup! I was thinking of the PEACEFUL Muslims that we now have working in the White House with the ever trustworthy Obama and Killary and Huma Abedin (ties to the Muslim Brotherhood) along with their close relationship with CAIR and MAS. This family used the death of their son to advance their Islamic family. The father is an attorney (I’m sure very tight with his mosque and brothers in Islam) and probably connected to the above mentioned why else would he come forward? Even Killary’s pick for VP has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood,
Gates of Vienna reports that Kaine “stressed the need for people of all faith traditions to work together to overcome intolerance and bigotry[,]” a key message of the ‘interfaith dialogue’ movement – a movement which Islamists generally promote to conceal their true intentions of furthering Islam. Also in 2007, Kaine regrettably appointed MAS President Dr. Esam Omeish to Virginia’s Commission on Immigration (Omeish resigned shortly after). The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) reveals some of Omeish’s radical proclivities:
We are being led like sheep!!
gravenimage says
When Trump replied that “the real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm”, Khan sneered that this was “fake empathy”.
In other words, he considers Trump the “real” problem for wanting to keep Jihadists out of the US, rather than the Jihadists who killed his son.
Just more proof that the most important thing for most Muslims is ensuring the spread of Islam at all costs.
Bezelel says
In his speech Mr. khan implied that he came to the US with practically nothing then I read this;
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/07/31/media-rush-to-use-khizr-kahn-as-leverage-to-aid-candidate-hillary-clinton/#more-119570
Nothing is as it seems.
Jay Boo says
Some good info there.
Mark Swan says
Yes this Mr. Khan seems to be just another myriad faced, Muslim, after all.
Peter says
Islamic terrorism has everything to do with Islam. Muhammad was himself a terrorist (“I have been made victorious with terror”).
So, another “kahn job.”
David Kolbinsky says
We feel sorry for them, and appreciate the families loss, but he is not a very likable guy. He can’t really be as obtuse as he comes across. If the son did not appreciate the threat of Islamic terrorism, why was he fighting in where, Iraq? Why was he fighting other Muslims. That won’t gain him the virgins in the afterlife.
I’ve seen this narrative played out before; first they are the victims, and then they let loose with their criticism of anyone who appears to resist the propaganda concerning their righteous devotion to upholding the honor of their “faith”. All under the watchful, approving eye of the Democrat Party.The guy got nasty quick, didn’t he? All that was missing was the shouting of the phrase, “rAllahu Akbar”
Wendy says
Does anyone know why his son ran toward the truck while telling the others to take cover?
linnte says
Wendy, I asked this same question. Why stick around when safety was available? What would approaching the vehicle accomplish? And how did he know it had a bomb in the first place?
For what we know about Muslims and martyrdom, it seems to me this soldier knew his only chance for Paradise was martyrdom. These are questions we will never get the answer to.
underbed cat says
Wendy and linnte…I have wondered also…how did this he know the approaching truck had a bomb? I too know loss of any human life is sad, he is viewed as a hero…what happened to truck he ran towards and the men in the truck he left…These are all difficult questions and we may never know as you stated. The only thing I could think is he knew who was coming.
Michael McDermott says
I am a regular listener to an UK Radio station LBC: thtis a.m. they quoted the Trump comment only in part, which produces an unbalanced impression – on purpose of course. Of late LBC appear to have moved their editorial approach to matters Muslim/Islam.
Rachel Cohen says
This godless Sharia Muslim–is himself a terrorist–using taqiyya to promote Islamic terrorism.
Rachel Cohen says
There should be NO Sharia Muslims in the US military–they more than once, have committed mass murder upon American soldiers. Being a Sharia Muslim and being a genuine American–is antithetical.
God Almighty says
I will stick with reading the Beano and Dandy..They make more sense.
ECAW says
The Beano has at least inspired great art:
Baucent says
Mr Khan of all people should know there is a problem with Islam. It’s simply not credible to keep saying terror attacks are nothing to do with Islam. Maybe not with his brand of Islam. Maybe not in his interpretation of the Islamic texts. But it IS for many other muslims who find plenty of justification for terror attacks and supremacist views of non muslims. Maybe Mr Khan should explain why Islam is a religion of peace?
patriotliz says
Muslims like Kahn are the very reason we will NEVER win the war against Islamic terror.
There are Muslims who pretend to be “moderate” allies or even US patriots but would prefer that our country commit national suicide at the hands of their co-religionists acting out the commands of Mohammed and his Quran via worldwide supremacist warfare. First they must deceive (taqiyya), take advantage of our naïve good will and tolerance of all religions (w/o exceptions unfortunately), infiltrate the country including the military (hegira) and then slit our throats.
Me thinks Mr. Kahn protests too much against Trump who wants to protect Americans and not at all against the evil Muslim monsters that killed his son. Very strange indeed.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says we HAVE to admit ANY foreigner in order to prove that we are TOLERANT of an ideology incompatible with Western values that just happens to cloak itself as a “religion.” Why doesn’t anyone ask why the UAE and other rich Muslim countries don’t take in Muslim migrants BUT, BUT…if WE don’t accept any and all Muslims, then WE are somehow branded as the evil and intolerant ones. Give me a break! This is HEGIRA to take over Western Civilization.
Mr. Kahn found refuge for his ire against Trump, who only wants to protect Americans from wild-eyed Muslim crazies who HATE, within the welcoming arms of the Progressive Communist Party (aka, Democrat party). An Islamic-Marxist alliance is what is absolutely needed to bring down America and destroy any remnant of common sense survival instinct. It’s happening all over Europe.
DP111 says
I dont know the exact numbers, but I think that more American soldiers have been killed by Muslim American soldiers in America, then Muslim American soldiers who died fighting for America.
sham says
terrorist are the productions of jews/christian :their intention to destroy Islam & making the resources of anti Islamic psych sites & stop mass islamisation through the world:
THAT NEVER HAPPENS ,BEST EXAMPLE 9/11 PPL CONVERTING AFTER 9/11 THREE TIME MORE THAN BEFORE………
3:19. Truly, the religion with Allâh is Islâm. Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to account.
DESTINY OF LAYERS/HATERS/TERRORIST/CRIMINALS
22: 51. But those who strive against Our Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.), to frustrate and obstruct them, they will be dwellers of the Hell-fire.
11: 18. And who does more wrong than he who invents a lie against Allâh. Such wi,l be brought before their Lord, and the witnesses will say, “These are the ones who lied against their Lord!” No doubt! the curse of Allâh is on the Zâlimûn (polytheists, wrong-doers, oppressors, etc.).
19. Those who hinder (others) from the Path of Allâh (Islâmic Monotheism), and seek a crookedness therein, while they are disbelievers in the Hereafter.
20. By no means will they escape (from Allâh’s Torment) on earth, nor have they protectors besides Allâh! Their torment will be doubled! They could not bear to hear (the preachers of the truth) and they used not to see (the truth because of their severe aversin, inspite of the fact that they had the sense of hearing and sight).
21. They are those who have lost their ownselves, and their invented false deities will vanish from them.
22. Certainly, they are those who will be the greatest losers in the Hereafter.
23. Verily, those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) and do righteous good deeds, and humble themselves (in repentance and obedience) before their Lord, – they will be dwellers of Paradise to dwell therein forever.
21: 3. And among mankind is he who disputes concerning Allâh, without knowledge, and follows every rebellious (disobedient to Allâh) Shaitân (devil) (devoid of each and every kind of good).
4. For him (the devil) it is decreed that whosoever follows him, he will mislead him, and will drive him to the torment of the Fire. [Tafsir At-Tabarî]
13: 42. And verily, those before them did devise plots, but all planning is Allâh’s. He knows what every person earns, and the disbelievers will know who gets the good end (final destination).
14: 3. Those who prefer the life of this world instead of the Hereafter, and hinder (men) from the Path of Allâh (i.e.Islâm) and seek crookedness therein – They are far astray.
16: 61. And if Allâh were to seize mankind for their wrong-doing, He would not leave on it (the earth) a single moving (living) creature, but He postpones them for an appointed term and when their term comes, neither can they delay nor can they advance it an hour (or a moment).
16: 88. Those who disbelieved and hinder (men) from the Path of Allâh, for them We will add torment over the torment; because they used to spread corruption [by disobeying Allâh themselves, as well as ordering others (mankind) to do so].
16: 104. Verily! Those who believe not in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, Allâh will not guide them and theirs will be a painful torment.
105. It is only those who believe not in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, who fabricate falsehood, and it is they who are liars.
34: 20. And indeed Iblîs (Satan) did prove true his thought about them, and they followed him, all except a group of true believers (in the Oneness of Allâh).
40: 25 the plots of disbelievers are nothing but errors!
40:56. Verily, those who dispute about the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, without any authority having come to them, there is nothing else in their breasts except pride [to accept you (Muhammad SAW) as a Messenger of Allâh and to obey you]. They will never have it (i.e. Prophethood which Allâh has bestowed upon you). So seek refuge in Allâh (O Muhammad SAW from the arrogants). Verily, it is He Who is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer.
49: 16. Say: “Will you inform Allâh about your religion? While Allâh knows all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth, and Allâh is All-Aware of everything.
53: 28. While they have no knowledge thereof. They follow but a guess, and verily, guess is no substitute for the truth.
29. Therefore withdraw (O Muhammad SAW) from him who turns away from Our Reminder (this Qur’ân) and desires nothing but the life of this world.
54: 2. And if they see a sign, they turn away, and say: “This is continuous magic.”
3. They belied (the Verses of Allâh, this Qur’ân), and followed their own lusts. And every matter will be settled [according to the kind of deeds (for the doer of good deeds, his deeds will take him to Paradise, and similarly evil deeds will take their doers to Hell)].
4. And indeed there has come to them news (in this Qur’ân) wherein there is (enough warning) to check (them from evil),
5. Perfect wisdom (this Qur’ân), but (the preaching of) warners benefit them not,
6. So (O Muhammad SAW) withdraw from them. The Day that the caller will call (them) to a terrible thing.
56: 46. And were persisting in great sin (joining partners in worship along with Allâh, committing murders and other crimes, etc.)
56: 83. Then why do you not (intervene) when (the soul of a dying person) reaches the throat?
84. And you at the moment are looking on,
85. But We (i.e. Our angels who take the soul) are nearer to him than you, but you see not,
86. Then why do you not, if you are exempt from the reckoning and recompense (punishment, etc.)
87. Bring back the soul (to its body), if you are truthful?
58: 16. They have made their oaths a screen (for their evil actions). Thus they hinder (men) from the Path of Allâh, so they shall have a humiliating torment.
17. Their children and their wealth will avail them nothing against Allâh. They will be (the) dwellers of the Fire, to dwell therein forever.
18. On the Day when Allâh will resurrect them all together (for their account), then they will swear to Him as they swear to you (O Muslims). And they think that they have something (to stand upon). Verily, they are liars!
19. Shaitân (Satan) has overtaken them. So he has made them forget the remembrance of Allâh. They are the party of Shaitân (Satan). Verily, it is the party of Shaitân (Satan) that will be the losers!
20. Those who oppose Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW), they will be among the lowest (most humiliated).
21. Allâh has decreed: “Verily! It is I and My Messengers who shall be the victorious.” Verily, Allâh is All-Powerful, All-Mighty.
61: 8. They intend to put out the Light of Allâh (i.e. the religion of Islâm, this Qur’ân, and Prophet Muhammad SAW) with their mouths. But Allâh will complete His Light even though the disbelievers hate (it).
67: 19. Do they not see the birds above them, spreading out their wings and folding them in? None upholds them except the Most Beneficent (Allâh). Verily, He is the All-Seer of everything.
20. Who is he besides the Most Beneficent that can be an army to you to help you? The disbelievers are in nothing but delusion.
21. Who is he that can provide for you if He should withhold His provision? Nay, but they continue to be in pride, and (they) flee (from the truth).
22. Is he who walks without seeing on his face, more rightly guided, or he who (sees and) walks on a Straight Way (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism).
23. Say it is He Who has created you, and endowed you with hearing (ears), seeing (eyes), and hearts. Little thanks you give.
24. Say: “It is He Who has created you from the earth, and to Him shall you be gathered (in the Hereafter).”
25. They say: “When will this promise (i.e. the Day of Resurrection) come to pass? if you are telling the truth.”
26. Say (O Muhammad SAW): “The knowledge (of its exact time) is with Allâh only, and I am only a plain warner.”
27. But when they will see it (the torment on the Day of Resurrection) approaching, the faces of those who disbelieve will be different (black, sad, and in grieve), and it will be said (to them): “This is (the promise) which you were calling for!”
28. Say (O Muhammad SAW): “Tell me! If Allâh destroys me, and those with me, or He bestows His Mercy on us, – who can save the disbelievers from a painful torment?”
29. Say: “He is the Most Beneficent (Allâh), in Him we believe, and in Him we put our trust. So you will come to know who is it that is in manifest error.”
30. Say (O Muhammad SAW): “Tell me! If (all) your water were to be sunk away, who then can supply you with flowing (spring) water?”
68: 51. And verily, those who disbelieve would almost make you slip with their eyes through hatredness when they hear the Reminder (the Qur’ân), and they say: “Verily, he (Muhammad SAW) is a madman!”
52. But it is nothing else than a Reminder to all the ‘Alamîn (mankind, jinns and all that exists).
7: 33. Say, “My Lord has only forbidden immoralities – what is apparent
of them and what is concealed – and sin, and oppression
Without right, and that you associate with Allah that for which
He has not sent down authority, and that you say about Allah that which you do not know.”
Keys says
sham, would you please send some more Islamic quotations.
Thanks.
ECAW says
Yes we need some more. I can feel an urge to convert coming on.
eagle says
It is best to be sitting on the commode when that urge is coming on. Khizr Khan is a Muslim lawyer and is well versed in Taqiyya. By Obama’s executive order, Muslims of America do not have to pledge allegiance to America. It is my belief he was not in combat with his Muslim Brothers. Khizr Khan and CAIR with Obama’s support will bilk the American people of taxpayers money. Khizr Khan’s family will be well compensated and move back to Pakistan. It is sad to think our own American wounded solder will not receive the compensation this Muslim family will get. We have an ISIS supporter in the oval office and congress is totally blind to this. Let the excrement flow out to sea.
More Ham Ed says
Yer’ wearin’ out my mouse middle wheel.
DP111 says
ALLEN WEST Released A BLISTERING PERSONAL MASSAGE For The MUSLIM FATHER Who ATTACKED TRUMP At DNC … THIS is a MUST READ
http://topsecretinfodump.com/allen-west-released-blistering-personal-massage-muslim-father-went-trump-dnc-must-read/
Keys says
Right, well worth reading, DP111. I hope Trump and his writers read it and use it.
Yorkshire Kufir says
Sorry mr. Khan, your son was murderd by islamists and they viewed him as an apostate. Are you going to argue that islamists are not muslims?
Mahendra Singh says
Mr Khan
Read your Koran first, this time mor e carefully. IT WILL BE AN EYE OPENER.
Jay Boo says
His Koran is incompatible with the US Constitution.
Norwegian says
Not to do with islam?
Ok, must be the weather then….???
Fan says
Dear Robert Spencer;
This was a great article. Thank-you. I have read that Mr. Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood Agent. Are you able to verify if this is true? Most legitimate media is not covering this part of the story. I came here for insight. Thanks for your meaningful contribution to society through your research.
A fan.
Dustin Koellhoffer says
How does he feel about his son being an apostate assisting Christians in killing his fellow Moslems?
How does he feel about imposing Sharia on the rest of the world?
epistemology says
His son is an exception not the rule like Major Nidal. Remember Fort Hood.
More Ham Ed says
Religion of Pieces Update:
28935 deadly ISLAMIC terror attacks since 9/11.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com