The Washington Post has been biased in its coverage of the Trump campaign, to say the least, and was banned from a Trump-Pence rally, after which a follow-up article declared: “that should scare the hell out of you”. Well, it sure angered the hell out of the Washington Post.
A follow-up attack took aim for Trump’s “jugular” and shoved the raw emotions of a grieving Muslim couple into its headlines — the same couple who took the stage at the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia, as Jihad Watch noted here.
The couple spoke of their son, Captain Humayun Khan of the US Army, who was stationed in Iraq and killed by jihadists 12 years ago in an attack explosion. Parents do not get over the death of their children, and the Washington Post in a feature report — with full video included, and a link to the Arlington Cemetery where the young captain was buried as a hero — elected this couple to do their dirty work in a low attempt to besmirch Trump, as seen in the article below.
Agreed with Humayun’s father, Khizr Khan, about his statement: “Go look at the graves of the brave patriots who died defending America — you will see all faiths, genders, and ethnicities”, and indeed, that must never be forgotten. But the Post and the DNC presented this in service of a truly ominous agenda.
The implication presented by the Washington Post and the DNC as they featured Khizr Khan and the story of his son is that Trump — and by extension all those who aim to protect the American public by targeting jihadists with zero tolerance — are not just opposed to jihad terror, but anti-Muslim, and only appreciative of contributions to America based on faith and ethnicity.
Shame on the Washington Post and the Democratic National Convention for fanning the flames of the us-versus-them mentality in the course of their attack on Trump, and preying on the grieving family of Captain Humayun Khan to fuel their agenda.
More on this story. “The father of Muslim soldier killed in action just delivered a brutal repudiation of Donald Trump”, by Philip Bump, The Washington Post, June 28, 2016:
Donald Trump was speaking at an event in Iowa, complaining that America was not allowed to waterboard terrorists, when Khizr Khan and his wife walked up to the microphone at the Democratic convention in Philadelphia.
Khan’s son, Humayun, was a captain in the U.S. Army. When a vehicle packed with explosives approached his compound in Iraq in 2004, he instructed his men to seek cover as he ran toward it. The car exploded, killing Khan instantly. He was awarded the Bronze Star posthumously.
In 2005, The Washington Post interviewed Khizr Khan. “They did not call him Captain Khan,” he said of the men his son led. “They called him ‘our captain.’ ”
“We are honored to stand here as the parents of Captain Humayun Khan,” the elder Khan said at the Democratic convention, “and as patriotic American Muslims with undivided loyalty to our country.” He spoke of his son’s dreams of becoming a military lawyer and how Hillary Clinton had referred to his son as “the best of America.”
Then he focused his attention on Trump.
“If it was up to Donald Trump, [Humayun] never would have been in America,” Khan said. “Donald Trump consistently smears the character of Muslims. He disrespects other minorities, women, judges, even his own party leadership. He vows to build walls and ban us from this country.
“Donald Trump,” he said, “you are asking Americans to trust you with our future. Let me ask you: Have you even read the U.S. Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy.” He pulled a copy of the Constitution from his pocket. “In this document, look for the words ‘liberty’ and ‘equal protection of law.’ ” Earlier this month, Trump promised congressional Republicans that he would defend “Article XII” of the Constitution, which doesn’t exist.
“Have you ever been to Arlington Cemetery?” Khan asked. “Go look at the graves of the brave patriots who died defending America — you will see all faiths, genders, and ethnicities.
“You have sacrificed nothing. And no one.”…..

vcragain says
” not just opposed to jihad terror, but anti-Muslim” – yes we are ALL opposed to Jihad Terror, but we cannot fight that same Jihad terror without fighting the cult of Islam itself. The problem then arises how to do THAT without blaming all Muslim people. I can see the difference quite clearly, but apparently not too many others can and comments get quite hysterical on the subject. We really need to make VERY clear that hating Islam’s teachings & ‘book’ is not hating those who follow it’s early ‘peaceful’ mode – which is MOST of them. Is it possible that we could make them sign a declaration that they disavow the later teachings in the Koran ? This idea would create one big stink, BUT it would cause them all to know what those later writings actually say, and force a real discussion on the subject, and MAYBE cause some to rethink what their faith actually stands for (and possibly give it up? we can but hope) – I am just trying to find a resolution to our problem ! I just think education of all the population is sorely needed, what shall I put on my new tees ? Is a new movement of ‘Koran 01 to 06’ needed so they can follow only those writings & forget the rest – where do the violent teachings start ? Create Islam-Vers2 as a new religion ? Maybe I need to rewrite the Koran myself just getting rid of all the violent & hateful passages and distribute it ? If all these people have a love of their ‘God’ (Allah) then we cannot expect them to just give THAT up – they FEEL it every day, and place their hopes in that – we need to substitute the problems with solutions – If I were Dictator tomorrow I would just create a new ‘Koran’, and get rid of the old one – simple !
Maybe we should make the original Koran illegal, but allow only the early writings ?
Confiscate them at the airport – replace with Vers2 ?
It’s all doable, but not without creating a furious backlash about religious freedom !.
How do we teach the world how bad the later Koran writings are without also giving the ‘nuts’ in our midst ideas ?
Real solution ideas requested !!!
linnte says
There IS NOT ANY solution! That’s the problem! And that’s the problem for “peaceful” Muslims too, but they can’t say that because to deny ANY of Muhammad’s Qur’an is apostacy. So here the whole world is held captive by a dead man who plagiarised the Torah and Gospel, who’s whole life is focused on power OVER people and sex. Is the world SAD that Hitler is dead? Is the world sad in the movie “War of the World’s” when the aliens die out because of indigenous bacteria? No! We rejoiced! Islam must be eradicated.
Reading Robert Spencers book “Infidels Guide to Iran” made me think about how Americans and Europeans view Muslims from our own cultural standpoint, when the REAL Islam is not here or in Europe, but in the Middle East. And as the so called refugees pour into our country, the Middle East is coming to us!
KnowThyEnemy says
“How do we teach the world how bad the later Koran writings are without also giving the ‘nuts’ in our midst ideas ?”
We need to lay the blame where it actually belongs. If the nuts get any ideas it would not be our fault; it would be Quran’s (Islam’s) fault. If you are saying that the ‘nuts’ will start killing and murdering, I say let’s do it (tell the world about later Quran) now when they can be defeated with little loss, than later when it might become impossible to defeat them.
————-
There is only one ‘real’ solution that I can think of- To declare Islam to be a subversive political ideology (which is what it actually is), as has been done to Nazism and Communism. Their adherents have been refused immigration to the US, and those already here have been blacklisted (no positions of power and influence for them). In addition, the dangerous nature of those ideologies is taught in schools and colleges. The same needs to be done with Islam. That’s the solution that will work!
Daniel Triplett says
“Abrogation.”
Muslims don’t get to choose to follow the earlier peaceful parts of the Quran, instead of the later violent passages. The peaceful parts are obsolete, no longer exist, and are superceded by the later directives.
This is non-negotiable. Any Muslim telling you otherwise is lying to you.
witness00 says
very true and any muslim who would sign such a declaration would be killed by the “devout” muslims as an apostate.
Daniel Triplett says
Yes.
ISIS are perfect Muslims in every way. Role models for all to follow. They’re just doing exactly what their source texts tell them to do, word for word.
And when the rest of us aren’t willing to get-on-board with the program, they do to us… exactly what their source texts tell them to do to us.
witness00 says
Keep dreaming LOL no muslims are going to go for that and anyways there is taqiyya, islam sanctioned lying to non-believers, how can you trust them when there is THAT? You sound like a liberal, those that believe in unicorn fantasy world. I hope you educate yourself about islam, and prepare yourself.
Amy Soldier says
Khan’s identity as a Muslim is always the most important definition of himself to the world. The proud Muslim Khan will neither allow himself the dignity of character to criticize the devout Muslims of Islamist nations who created the environment that brought his son to Iraq, nor will he publicly criticize any prominent Muslim and any aspect of Islamist thought that that is the root cause of all the many incidents of strife and mayhem everywhere the religion of Islam exists. But Khan is quick to tell the world he knows Donald Trump is a real problem. What is the one word I’m searching for to best sum up what people like Khan are? Why, they’re “Muslims,” and they just want to be “Muslims,”
Khan is only another pathetic little stooge enlisted by the many rats-assed corporations of the West all playing their parts towards furthering the imbecilic Socialist mentality that permeates and drives the thoughts and intentions of the elite headquartered in Brussels.
Kev says
HERE IS ANOTHER U.S. MUSLIM SERVICEMAN – Nidal Malik Hasan (born September 8, 1970) is an American convicted of fatally shooting 13 people and injuring more than 30 others in the Fort Hood mass shooting on November 5, 2009.[3] Hasan was a United States Army Medical Corps psychiatrist who admitted to the shootings at his court-martial in August 2013.[3][4][5] A jury panel of 13 officers convicted him of 13 counts of premeditated murder, 32 counts of attempted murder, and unanimously recommended he be dismissed from the service and sentenced to death.[3][6][7] Hasan is incarcerated at the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas awaiting execution while his case is reviewed by appellate courts – MAYBE ALL THE RELATIVES OF THE DEAD CAN SHARE THE STAGE AT THE DNC
DP111 says
What is worrying the Islamic world is that there is a momentum to close the gates of West to Muslim immigration. To Islam this is worse then slaughter. These gates should never have been opened in the first place, as the goal of every Muslim, whether the above grieving or not, is to bring the West under sharia. This tenet our forefathers knew every well. If they had been as negligent or ill educated as our current leaders, there would be no Western civilisation.
So if this couple’s son died as a soldier in the US armed forces, is neither here not there.
Jack Diamond says
Major Hasan made it clear in his PowerPoint presentation and then proved it with bullets, that Muslims should not be in the U.S. military when we are fighting Muslims and in Muslim countries. It is an unacceptable risk. Just like having the likes of Fr. Hamel’s murderer working as a baggage handler at an airport. Muslims should not be allowed to work in our airports. It is an unacceptable risk.
The same risk applies to Muslim immigration, of course, as it does to tolerance of a seditious culture of hate that accompanies the presence of the umma in the midst of infidels. Unacceptable.
Daniel Triplett says
Damn right Jack. Trusting ANY Muslim is to trust a rattlesnake.
Remember, 1 out of 7 US KIAs in Afghanistan are “Green-on-Blue;” US trained Afghan troops turning their guns on us.
DP111 says
Israel does not like the idea of RoP members in IDF. Wonder why? They must be “racist” or even worse, “Islamophobes”.
WhatsUpDoc says
I do have respect for parents. Most Muslims are good people but there is absolutely no good in Islam.
I think now Clintons are going to try finding a Muslim who love gays and make him his campaign advertising.
duh swami says
Most Muslims are good people…
Do ‘good’ people worship ‘bad’ gods? Do they believe gays, apostates and blasphemers should be killed as per sharia? If so, I question that goodness…
Kay says
There are some who don’t follow Islam; they were just born in Muslim majority countries. Some others escaped Islamist terror and live here in Muslim families; again, they hadn’t chosen Islam nor were political but simply were born into a culture in a Muslim majority country.
Nimrod says
Yea, but the vast majority won’t renounce Islam or criticize it. They end up being passive supporters of the devout violent and civilizational jihadists.
Daniel Triplett says
I don’t believe that Kay.
Otherwise, why don’t Muslim immigrants ditch Islam the moment they set foot in Dar-al-Harb, where they’re protected by our Western laws?
Why don’t Western Muslimas look at our Western women with envy, and divorce their husbands (owners)?
Why are there THOUSANDS of mosques in Europe and North America?
Most all Muslims truly buy into that evil. They don’t believe Islam is evil.
Muslims believe WE are evil.
duh swami says
If they don’t follow Islam/sharia then they are not Muslims…
DP111 says
I have no doubt that Muslims have the potential to be good people. And mostly they are. But the problem arises when they have to give to the pay Mohammad as well as pay Caeser. They always pay Mohammad, or else they become apostates.
Thats when Major Hasan payed Mohammad rather then the USA and the constitution.
duh swami says
The pious do not join the military of kuffar…The pious do not fight kuffar battles for them…The pious do not wave the US Constitution…unless it’s taqiyya, it’s apostasy…
Papa Whiskey says
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.
— Winston Churchill
If the missus is elected, she will strive to criminalize criticism of this retrograde force, in line with UN/OIC Resolution 16/18.
duh swami says
As SOS she signed on to the Muslim supported UN resolution 161d, which is a slap in the face of free speech..Her boss at the time agrees, he said, ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam….more treason they got away with…
Keys says
The future must not belong to those who do not tell the truth including those who do not tell the truth about Mohammad.
Sam says
Enemy number one is liberals, their powerful media and uninformed youth and Islam are tools they use to destroy America.
Informational war we are in like my hero Spencer is engaged in this site is unfortunately not enough to win a war against this poweful liberalism and the stupid Islam.
Evil has to be fought by brutal force.
Jay Boo says
“The first victim in war is the truth”
Daniel Triplett says
Agreed. It’s a two-pronged strategy.
We must show them overwhelming, brutal force to earn their respect…such as an Allied nuke strike on the N Korean nuke arsenal, the Pakistani nuke arsenal, the Iranian nuke production facilities, and Raqqa all in one day.
This will open their ears to experts like Robert, who can explain the fraud and evil of Islam, and offer them a righteous alternative.
But if they think they’re winning, they’ll have no respect for Robert’s words, or any other Kaffir.
lanja says
Have some respect on constitution Mr Trump, what a shame you are for America. You ban Muslims, Mexicans, Asians, Blacks what the he’ll hell you are going to make America. Your head is down with shame, a Muslim came and teach you about constitution, shame on you. You and your party will never gain power up to next 20 years. Nothing difference between Trump and Osama bin Laden. one is Christian and other one is Muslim.
KnowThyEnemy says
lanja, watch this video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0taTSaUO2hM
Angemon says
lanja posted:
“You ban Muslims, Mexicans, Asians, Blacks what the he’ll hell you are going to make America. ”
First of all, Trump doesn’t “ban” anyone because he doesn’t have the power to do so. Second, where are you getting the idea he’s banning muslims, Mexicans, Asians or Blacks?
“Nothing difference between Trump and Osama bin Laden.”
I can think of many, many differences. For example, one says he wants to make America great again, the other said he wanted to bring America down. One is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans, the other isn’t. One is alive, the other one is dead like the filthy rat he was, complete with rat-nest beard.
witness00 says
dumb foreigner who watches too much BBC and CNN
Eric Novak says
Trump as President has Constitutional authority to ban anyone he wants to and he, along with Congress and the American people, can end immigration entirely. We do not owe you or anyone else anything. We can also remove you from the United States.
Wendy says
I’d love to know if there are any connections between Khizr Khan and HAMAS? In other words – CAIR, ISNA, Muslim Brotherhood, and all the other splintered organizations masquerading as a social justice group.
Elizabeth says
All muslims should be exported. Call it bigotry,I could care less! Muslim history is nothing but monstrous violence to all the cultures they’ve invaded and destroyed. http://linkis.com/wordpress.com/LwmBFThey create nothing but steal and destroy everything they inhabit including their own ugly countries. Who in their right minds would invite locusts into their homes?
Sajid says
How you read American history? How many countries have you invaded how many wars have you been involved in? If you want s blood fest history look at your own before pointing your nasty fingers about
bytheway says
Sajid…more from the “religion of peace:”
“Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.”
Sheikh Huwayni
“Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam.”
Mufti in Mecca consulted by Kuwaiti activist and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi.
“Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them yours. Why don’t you enslave their women?”
Sheikh Saad al-Buraik.
“It is permissible to take concubines and to have intercourse with one’s slave woman.”
Shaykh Muhammad Al Munajjid.
Just look at all the rape in Sweden.
“In Islam, it is allowed to take infidel women as slaves and in due course we will start taking women away and sell in the market.”
Abubakar Shekau, leader of the Congregation of the People of Tradition for Proselytism.
Nigeria today.
The Manual of Islamic Law can be downloaded at
http://www.shafiifiqh.com/maktabah/relianceoftraveller.pdf
Read it and weep. How can you possibly defend this? Seriously…
Angemon says
Sajid posted:
“How you read American history? How many countries have you invaded how many wars have you been involved in?”
Have you? Here, let me pick a random war – WWII. US troops were involved in operations in, among others, France, Germany and Italy.
Would you have preferred if the US took no part in WWII? Hitler would have had your devout muslim grandparents keeping the Jews company in the ovens. Or maybe Stalin would have sent your devout muslim grandparents to a “re-education” camp in Siberia where they would ended up buried under the permafrost.
I swear, muslim rhetoric gets stupider by the day. You want to talk about wars and invasions? Fine – start by explaining the muslim invasion of Europe on the 8th century. Then explain the Armenian Genocide and the deaths of Hindus after the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan.
Elizabeth says
http://linkis.com/wordpress.com/LwmBF
linnte says
In his DNC speech, papa Khan tells us exactly what his son did to become a hero. He said, (paraphrase) ” he told the ten soldiers to get away, then he walked toward the vehicle. I don’t know why he walked toward the vehicle”. If the other soldiers could get away, why didn’t son Khan get away too? Did he attempt to save a vehicle? I don’t think so. Did he become a martyr? I do think so!
linnte says
And I think papa Khan thinks so too.
Mirren10 says
I think you’re most probably correct, linnte.
I can’t think of any other reason why a trained soldier would do such an idiotic thing, against all military training. I think you’re probably right about the parents, also.
linnte says
Thanks Mirren. I learned a long time ago, people will tell you, inadvertently, what is really on their hearts if we just listen between the lines.
Also something I find strange is how many common people the DNC had up to speak; mother’s of slain blacks, and the Khan’s, who were not fearful at all about being in stage in front of the whole world. If that were you or I, wouldn’t there be some outward sign of stage fright? To me this proves they are well practiced and coached. Being a parent, the ultimate horror is losing a child, yet these people seem calm and calculated in their speech delivery.
DFD says
linnte says: “….. yet these people seem calm and calculated in their speech delivery.”
Are you surprisded? Their ‘faith’ is more important to them than their children.
linnte says
Not surprised at all! It seems that the speakers have been set up by the DNC is my point. Even the black mother’s of dead sons had smiles. It is disgusting.
utis says
I see no evidence that Hillary will fight this plague. Remember that the fist attack on the World Trade Center, the Beltway Sniper, and the attack near CIA headquarters (1993) all took place in the Clinton reign. If the Clintons gave a damn, I didn’t hear about it.
She also refused to broach the “religion” topic recently. No religion should be above criticism or questioning. That principle is also implied in the Constitution her stooge is waving around. At least Trump uses the “M” word. We’re closer to an honest investigation under him than under Hillary.
Jay Boo says
Listen for the Hillary Thump!
I am developing a high powered laser that can set Hillary’s super-sonic broomstick ablaze sending her tumbling back to planet earth at terminal velocity.
Annie Oakley says
I spent decades in the US military and had many excellent, well-liked commanders. The father’s claim that the soldiers in that unit consistently referred to CPT Kahn as “our captain” is out of step with American military culture (in which our loyalty is to the nation, not individual military leaders). We would call an officer by his/her rank and last name or “sir/ma’am”. We would refer to him (in conversations where he wasn’t present) by his rank and last name, “the Company Commander ” (if that’s what his job was), or other references that would’ve reflected his job and left no doubt in the listener’s mind about who was being discussed, “the CO”, “the 6”, etc. There are exceptions but they typically only involve high-level commanders, not small unit commanders. Stonewall Jackson, Blood & Guts Patton, the Swamp Fox, Mad Dog Mattis, are some examples.
If I’d ever found myself in a unit with the sort of “cult worship” that Mr. Kahn seems to believe existed, I would’ve been very alarmed indeed! These are usually associated with foreign armies that prop up regimes that oppose liberty.
Perhaps Mr. Kahn’s claim is simply a grieving father trying to find solace in terms he’s culturally comfortable with. I hope this is the explanation. The teams that notify the next of kin when soldiers are wounded or killed are very thoroughly trained and would be unlikely to have said it. Perhaps soldiers who served under CPT Kahn have spoken with Mr. Kahn and in a wayward effort to ease his grief, said it.
I’d be interested in knowing more about the Bronze Star, specifically whether it had a “V” device indicating it was awarded for valor in combat or if it was awarded for administrative excellence.
Lesley says
While tragic, these parents losing their child only affirms the badness of Islam. Islam is bad for Muslims as well as non-Muslims.
Oskar Schindler was a Nazi whose humanity transcended his bad ideology– and Naziism was no less evil on account of his good deeds; it is the same was Islam.
There isn’t any ‘good’ Islam, and the decent people who call themselves Muslim out of tradition or sentimentality while not obeying the basic principles of their chosen religion are a moot point until they reform the barbaric tenets in the Koran and Hadith and force the ummah to follow their reformations.
Jay Boo says
Wait just a minute!
WHO was Khan (TRULY) trying to protect here?
“(HOLD YOUR FIRE I’VE GOT THIS) I’m a Muslim I know Muslims”
When a vehicle packed with explosives approached his compound in Iraq in 2004, he instructed his men to seek cover as he ran toward it.
Thomas says
With all respect, who killed your son?
Should we let those people into our country to kill more of our sons?
There are none so blind as those who will not see!
mike ryan says
I am voting Republican for the first time since I began voting in 1978. That’s how sick I am of the sleaze tactics, lies, and manipulation of the Democratic Party. I will be voting against Hillary more than I am voting for Trump.
KnowThyEnemy says
Wise move!
Daniel Triplett says
Welcome to the Light Mike.
Not once in 30 years of voting have I pulled the lever for a Democrat.
jewdog says
Holding up one good person in an effort to generalize in a positive way about a large group of people is just as inaccurate as holding up one bad person.The attempt to imply that there’s nothing at all to fear from Muslims because there are some good Muslims is just as ridiculous as saying that all Muslims are evil because some Muslims are evill. I found this gesture condescending and an insult to my intelligence. Trump may err on the side of pessimism about Islam, but that’s a safer bet. I like safe.
Hector Archytas says
His son was maybe in the army because he converted secretely to deism, the religion of the farher of the amefrican constitution against the will of his father.
Why should Khan try to use politically the death of his own son ?
خَليفة says
For money, or to try and show/convince his fellow Muslims his son was really a Muslim and died in the cause of Allah.
Muslims are shameless sociopaths
KnowThyEnemy says
To make Islam (and Muslims) look good. Nothing is more important to Muslims than these three things-
1) Protecting Islam (and Muslims, if possible) if it is under some threat,
2) To make Islam’s image look good (and Muslims’ image, if possible), and
3) To advance Islam (by advancing Muslims, if needed).
There are other things too that are important to Muslims, but NOTHING is more important than above three things. Remember these, and you will always be able to tell why a Muslim does what s/he does.
خَليفة says
DNC = Dhimmi National Convention
Black votes matter.
Muslim votes matter more.
Hilary is such a vote-whore.
JIMJFOX says
Black votes matter.
Muslim votes matter more.
White votes MUST be racist
خَليفة says
Funny….
Daniel Triplett says
@sajid
Do you think we’re stupid? We can read the Quran and Sunnah too.
We know about Abrogation, Taqiyya, Kitman, and Muruna.
That’s why we don’t trust a word you say, and we never will.
linnte says
Daniel, they hate it when we KNOW their own texts. I myself, LOVE it! ?
davej says
Deceit begets Submission.
By their acts you must judge them.
Guest says
The democrats are twisting up words as usual. Trump didn’t say anything about deporting Muslims born in America. He’s trying to keep the Muslim migrants out.
Stephanie says
Good for him, seems he overcame your backwards, violent, totaliatrian religion. And so? Back to the point…..
Champ says
A muslim *lying* about something someone else said? …yep they’re a dime a dozen!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
I wonder if there will be any exit polling to measure the importance of Moslems in the Hillary vs Donald race. My guess is no, because both the MSM and RINO wings of the media don’t want to know the answer, that’d be racist and religious bigotry. But it’s important. Very important.
It’s possible that even if voters have wised up to Moslems, they’ll still vote for Hillary because that’s a vote for money if you’re a public sector union member (e.g., a school teacher), or a crony capitalist, or a welfare recipient.
JIMJFOX says
29,000 recorded Islamic atrocities since 911? Tragic for this particular family
but the term ‘exception that proves the rule’ comes to mind…
BARBARA BROOKS says
There are many Muslims who are loyal citizens. Some have been allowed to emigrate because of their service to the U.S. military. However, I find it alarming that even Muslims loyal to the U.S. rarely organize events to stop extremists. They seem to think that because their family and friends are loyal to the U.S., so are nearly all Muslims.
We need to honor Muslims who have served without neglecting to prosecute and/or deport violent extremists.
duh swami says
There are many Muslims who are loyal citizens.
The pious can only be loyal to Allah…didn’t you read his book?
Daniel Triplett says
“We need to honor Muslims who have served”
No we don’t.
I don’t care whether or not a Muslim has served.
Why must we honor ANY adherent to an ideology which seeks our extermination?
Kev says
I WANT TO WARN EVERYBODY. The comments section has a ‘Sajid’ posting. I have received word from my friends, around the place, that Muslim Countries, especially Saudi Arabia, are now paying people to comment on these threads. ‘Sajid’ appears to be exactly one of these. BEWARE MY NON-MUSLIM FELLOW HUMANS – islam is conniving, deceitful and oppressive. These paid trolls seem to make a good argument.
More Ham Ed says
The DNC “victimhood” PR stunt was designed to accomplish 3 things:
1 – Perpetuate a victimhood machine that keeps cash flowing in.
2 – Make it sound like all muslims are good and innocent when in fact, according to either left-leaning or secular polls, at least 20% of muslims worldwide, probably more, follow the unholy ko ‘ran very closely, i.e. are violence-ready (300 million or more) and/oor support and sympathize with what ISIS is doing.
3 – Make it sound like those who are opposed to jihad terror are anti-Muslim, in other words paint the whole situation with a broad brush.
Muslims are more concerned with islam’s “image” than islam’s behavior around the world.
28916 deadly documented ISLAMIC terror attacks since 9/11.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
Jay Boo says
In line with the DNC victimhood theme Obama offered up fellow defender of Islam Hillary as a “victim”
On Hillary’s …. PERSISTENCE
Obama said. “And no matter how much people try to (knock her down), she never, ever quits. That is the Hillary I know.” Obama shows Hillary as VICTIM not villain for failure to learn from her mistakes and admit her error.
But notice in contrast, when Obama was running for office he used Albert Einstein’s famous quote — “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
Daniel Triplett says
Yes.
And remember, just 7% of Germans were Nazi. We all know how that turned out. The 93% may have had a totally different belief and value system, but they succumbed to the devout, and joined the program.
A minority with power, attitude, and guns can influence and control the majority quite easily.
And it’s even worse with the Muslims, because instead of 7%, the number is more like 25%. Moreover, the other 75% subscribe to the same ideology anyway, so all that’s needed is a little “persuading” from the 25% to make the other 75% live up to the obligations of their faith.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Hey Sajid: Your co-religionists have done more than enough, over the last 1400 years, to make ANYONE with a single brain cell hate and despise ALL OF YOU. Lucky for YOU we’re Westerners, because when WE hate and despise something, WE DON’T THEN KILL IT. So do us all a favor ,OK? Go beat your wife, rape your 8 yr. old sex-slave, then get a good night’s rest because tomorrow, isn’t it time for you and your wife to genitally mutilate your 10 year old daughter?
You’ll need to be rested for that.
Oh, and Sajid? If this ‘grieving father’ was really an American patriot, he wouldn’t be caught DEAD at the DNC. No: He’d be risking his life, like his hero son did, to appear at the RNC, laud Trump, and call for EXACTLY what Mr. Trump is calling for: NO MORE MUSLIM IMMIGRATION.
And oh, God give me patience: For the millionth time, religious tests for IMMIGRATION purposes are 100% lawful. Newsflash all who criticize Trump’s position: The purpose of ANY nation’s decision to allow, or disallow, immigration, is to BENEFIT THE HOST COUNTRY. MUSLIMS BENEFIT NO ONE IN WESTERN CIVILIZATION. If we’re lucky, they’re bad muslims who don’t want to kill us. However they’re still a liability, because then they become targets for the MAJORITY of muslims who support Sharia, think women are chattel, and detest all things Western. Oh-and they 100% support killing ‘bad muslims’. Following me Sajid?
This ‘grieving father’ is a fake and a liar. Anyone notice his headbagged wife, who said not one word, and looked terrified out of her mind? Hello?
linnte says
Looking at the Middle East, how can any Western Muslim think they are good. Excellent points Kathy! And hello! How are you?
dodo says
Muslims killed their son, along with thousands of others. He should blame muslims
Daniel Triplett says
Exactly. Were it not for their vile, evil, putrid faith, their son would be alive, along with thousands of other Americans.
Blaming DJT is misplaced and offensive.
JS says
Many muslims are good people because by nature they are good people, not because of their faith. When good muslims truly learn and understand Islam, that’s when things turn ugly.
desidude2 says
These parents lost their son in a war, perhaps the Republican party needs to bring forth the thousands of families in the USA who, lost family members to these muslim jihadists. Each would have a story to tell how their innocent family members were killed by allah akbaring members of the religion of peace.
Islamisevil says
Meagan Kelly in an interview with Huckabee honors and defends the lying jihadi. Several at Fix News are drinking the camel pee.
Jimdandi says
I sympathize with Mr. and Mrs. Kahn in the loss of their son. I think they are now being used by the Dumbocrats to further their desire to allow more Muslim refugees into our country even though they cannot be properly vetted. I think Donald could have been a little more careful and truthful in his response. He could have said, “I have read the constitution and it is antithetical to Muslim Sharia law. I applaud your coming to our country and evidently repudiating Sharia and embracing our Constitutional form of government. We don’t want to ban people from coming to the U.S. because of their religion, but because they come with intent to subvert our government and our way of life”. Most of our political leaders are either ignorant of this or willfully blind to it.
Rachel Cohen says
These two godless hateful fools–are so unappreciative of American liberty–they are supporting Hillary C. They never should have been allowed into America. Those who do not support American liberty–do not belong here!
sham says
MY ADVICE TO AMERICAN PEOPLE : DON’T FOLLOW /SUPPORT RACIST CRIMINALS TERRORIST DONALD TRUMP , U’R VOTE FOR HIM ,JUST LIKE A ” SWITCH ON WW3 ”
RACIST QUAT’S
Keeping all this in mind, here are the most disgustingly outrageous things Donald Trump has ever said:
1. “An ‘extremely credible source’ has called my office and told me that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud”
Trump was determined to “expose” President Obama’s birthplace back in 2012, and even claimed to have sent investigators to Hawaii in the hopes of proving Obama wasn’t born in the United States.
2. “Robert Pattinson should not take back Kristen Stewart. She cheated on him like a dog & will do it again – just watch. He can do much better!”
Clearly Donald is a Team Edward kind of guy…
3. “Ariana Huffington is unattractive, both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man – he made a good decision.”
Trump always has charming things to say about successful, prominent women – but he stooped particularly low with this comment about Huffington Post founder.
4. “You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as you’ve got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.”
Trump proves (again) that he views a woman’s looks over anything else…
6. “I will build a great wall – and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me – and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.”
Oh for goodness sake.
7. “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists… And some, I assume, are good people.”
Just another casually racial slur, then…
8. “Our great African-American President hasn’t exactly had a positive impact on the thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore.”
Don’t worry, his racist outbursts aren’t just directed at Mexico.
9. “If I were running ‘The View’, I’d fire Rosie O’Donnell. I mean, I’d look at her right in that fat, ugly face of hers, I’d say ‘Rosie, you’re fired.’”
Trump has infamously hated on Rosie O’Donnell, making crude, sexist and misogynistic remarks about her on multiple occasions.
10. “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”
Because of course, no woman can resist Trump’s charms. [Throws up on keyboard]
11. “One of they key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace. Good people don’t go into government.”
Well at least he’s showing some self awareness.
12. “The beauty of me is that I’m very rich.”
And not that fabulous barnet of yours?
13. “It’s freezing and snowing in New York – we need global warming!”
Definitely not missing the point…
14. “I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”
Possibly (/definitely) one of the creepiest things we’ve ever heard…
15. “My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body.”
Ew.
16. “I have never seen a thin person drinking Diet Coke.”
We’re glad he’s so concerned about the obesity crisis.
17. “I think the only difference between me and the other candidates is that I’m more honest and my women are more beautiful.”
Women aren’t possessions, Donald. They can’t belong to you.
18. “You’re disgusting.”
To put this into context, Donald Trump said this to the opposing lawyer during a court case when she asked for a medical break to pump breast milk for her three-month-old daughter.
19. “The point is, you can never be too greedy.”
Campaign slogan = sorted.
20. “Sorry, there is no STAR on the stage tonight!”
In his Twitter liveblogging of the Democratic debate, Trump seemed to think he was watching a talent show rather than looking for the next POTUS.
21. “My Twitter has become so powerful that I can actually make my enemies tell the truth.”
We think Donald may be overestimating the power of Twitter.
22. “My IQ is one of the highest — and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure; it’s not your fault.”
Don’t worry, we won’t.
23. “I have so many fabulous friends who happen to be gay, but I am a traditionalist.”
What does that even mean?
24. “The other candidates — they went in, they didn’t know the air conditioning didn’t work. They sweated like dogs…How are they gonna beat ISIS? I don’t think it’s gonna happen.”
Because sweating = the inability to solve a political crisis. Gotcha.
25. “Look at those hands, are they small hands? And, [Republican rival Marco Rubio] referred to my hands: ‘If they’re small, something else must be small.’ I guarantee you there’s no problem. I guarantee.”
Along with the petition to keep him out of the UK, can we also campaign for Trump to stop talking about his penis?
26. “Thanks sweetie. That’s nice”
Said Donald in typically patronising style to a female 9/11 survivor. Inappropriate – and quite creepy.
27. “Lyin’ Ted Cruz just used a picture of Melania from a shoot in his ad. Be careful, Lyin’ Ted, or I will spill the beans on your wife!”
Threatening your opponent’s wife on Twitter? Stay classy, Don…
28. “I was down there, and I watched our police and our firemen, down on 7-Eleven, down at the World Trade Center, right after it came down”
Ah 7-Eleven, great convenience store, and def not to be confused with a national tragedy and symbol of global terrorism, eh Trump?
29. “The only card [Hillary Clinton] has is the woman’s card. She’s got nothing else to offer and frankly, if Hillary Clinton were a man, I don’t think she’d get 5 percent of the vote. The only thing she’s got going is the woman’s card, and the beautiful thing is, women don’t like her.”
Angemon says
sham posted:
“MY ADVICE TO AMERICAN PEOPLE : DON’T FOLLOW /SUPPORT RACIST CRIMINALS TERRORIST DONALD TRUMP”
Please stick to the truth and demonstrable facts, sham – I don’t like to defend Donald Trump. You called him a “racist criminals terrorist” – please back all those accusations.
“U’R VOTE FOR HIM ,JUST LIKE A ” SWITCH ON WW3 ””
Oh, for f***’s sake. This has got to be on purpose. It’s not bad enough that you’re a moron who can’t tell the difference between “your” and “you’re”, you had to take that to the next level and actually f*** up the illiterate version (where you replace “you” with “U” and “are” with “R”) wrong as well. All you had to do was to write two letters – UR or UR – and you managed to screw even that up by adding the apostrophe. “R” stands for “are” – do you write “you’are”? No, you f***ing don’t. In the immortal words of Charlie Brwown: AAUGH!!!
Oh, who am I trying to teach here? You probably think an “apostrophe” was one of the followers of Jesus Christ…
“Trump was determined to “expose” President Obama’s birthplace back in 2012”
Obama could have easily ended all speculation regarding this issue. He didn’t.
“Clearly Donald is a Team Edward kind of guy”
Do you even know what this means? If so, please explain.
“Trump always has charming things to say about successful, prominent women”
Citation needed. Are you talking about people like Rosie O’Donnell, who went out of their way to start feuds with him? Are you complaining that Trump is not pulling any punches because the people who went after him were women? That, you moron, is textbook sexism – you think that women are not as tough as men and need to be coddled and protected as if they’re children.
“but he stooped particularly low with this comment about Huffington Post founder.”
You mean that ugly woman with ugly views that managed to turn her husband away from women?
“Trump proves (again) that he views a woman’s looks over anything else”
How? How does he prove that? Please explain.
“Oh for goodness sake.”
Indeed – that’s my reaction to your nonsense.
“Just another casually racial slur, then… ”
“Racial slur”, eh? What race is “Mexican” again?
“Don’t worry, his racist outbursts aren’t just directed at Mexico.”
What “racist outbursts”? Oh, and “Mexico” is not a race you ignorant buffoon.
“Trump has infamously hated on Rosie O’Donnell, making crude, sexist and misogynistic remarks about her on multiple occasions.”
You mean that mocking a person who actively started a feud with him and just happens to be a woman is “misogyny” – i.e., hatred of women? Under what f***ing collectivist logic? This is how desperate Trump-haters are: he insults someone who went out of her way to start a feud with him and therefore he is “misogynist” and “sexist”. Funny how you don’t call him a misandrist even though he also mocked and insulted men. Because f*** men – they deserve it, right?
“Because of course, no woman can resist Trump’s charms. [Throws up on keyboard]”
Being confident in himself – OMG, what a terrible sin…
“Well at least he’s showing some self awareness.”
Unlike you. Oh, BTW – Trump’s not in government. You know who is? Hillary. Obama. Biden. All people you implicitly acknowledge as bad people due to your haste to slander Trump.
“And not that fabulous barnet of yours? ”
Uh-oh – what is it that you said about Trump’s remarks on Rosie O’Donnell and Ariana Huffington? Do you acknowledge you are swooping particularly low or that your remark is crude, sexist and misandrist? Of course not – for you, Trump is a “bad person” so it’s OK for you to do to him what you rail against he doing to people you consider as “good people”. You, sir/mam, are a HYPOCRITE.
“Women aren’t possessions, Donald. They can’t belong to you. ”
No, you moron. *PEOPLE* in general aren’t possessions. Not women, PEOPLE. But, of course, f*** men, right? Have you ever presented someone to someone else as being *your* husband, *your* wife, *your* parents, *your* children, etc.? Are you aware they can’t belong to you because PEOPLE aren’t possessions? OH? What’s that? “It’s just a form of speech indicating a relationship”? No, I’m going to hold you to the same standards you’re holding Trump to – you clearly think your parents, spouse, kids, friends, etc., are you possessions. But they’re not. Capisce?
“To put this into context, Donald Trump said this to the opposing lawyer during a court case when she asked for a medical break to pump breast milk for her three-month-old daughter. ”
First of all, citation needed. Second, is Trump never allowed to opinion on anything according to you?
“Campaign slogan = sorted.”
No, his campaign slogan is “Let’s make America great again”. F*** me, you have no idea of what Trump says, do you?
“In his Twitter liveblogging of the Democratic debate, Trump seemed to think he was watching a talent show rather than looking for the next POTUS.”
Or maybe – and try to keep up because this next bit can be hard to understand – he was being sarcastic. You know what sarcasm is, right? Well, I’m sure a genius like you would know what sarcasm is…
“We think Donald may be overestimating the power of Twitter. ”
Can he provide an example of what he said?
“Said Donald in typically patronising style to a female 9/11 survivor. Inappropriate – and quite creepy. ”
Ah, so you’re the arbiter of what’s “patronising” and “creepy”. Please provide full context. You had no problem to do so on #18, so why are you not doing it here?
“Threatening your opponent’s wife on Twitter?”
Threatening Cruz’s wife? What? You know what a threat is, right? How does saying “Be careful, Lyin’ Ted, or I will spill the beans on your wife!” qualifies as “threatening” someone else other than Cruz?
Fraser says
With all due respect to his sacrifice, he & his son must be part of the yet even tinier “tiny minority” at the other end of the spectrum.
patriotliz says
Muslims like Khan are the very reason we will NEVER win the war on Islamic terror.
There are Muslims who pretend to be “moderate” allies or even US patriots but would prefer that our country commit national suicide at the hands of their coreligionists acting out the commands of Mohammed and his Quran via worldwide supremacist warfare. First they must deceive (taqiyya), take advantage of our naive good will and tolerance of all religions (w/o exceptions unfortunately), infiltrate the country including the military (hegira) and then slit our throats.
Me thinks Mr. Khan protests too much against Trump who wants to protect Americans and not at all against the evil Muslim monsters that killed his son. Very strange indeed.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says we HAVE to admit ANY foreigner in order to prove that we are TOLERANT of an ideology incompatible with Western values that just happens to cloak itself as a “religion.” Why doesn’t anyone ask why the UAE and other rich Muslim countries don’t take in Muslim migrants BUT, BUT…if WE don’t accept any and all Muslims, then WE are somehow branded as the evil and intolerant ones. Give me a break! This is HEGIRA to take over Western Civilization.
Mr. Khan found refuge for his ire against Trump, who only wants to protect Americans from wild-eyed Muslim crazies, within the welcoming arms of the Progressive Communist Party (aka, Democrat party). An Islamic-Marxist alliance is what is absolutely needed to bring down America and destroy any remnant of common sense survival instinct. It’s happening all over Europe.
Blangwort says
My only response to those who imply resistance to Islam is bigotry is to READ HISTORY. Read the Quran. If you’re really curious, read the Hadith.
Next, read the Pact of Omar. Now compare it to the Bill of Rights.
Ask yourself: Is this a culture that anyone can expect to deal with honestly?
gravenimage says
In featuring grieving Muslim parents, WaPo, DNC imply all resistance to jihad is bigotry
…………………………..
Yes–and all too many are swallowing this–the Dems found the perfect attack dog here against anyone who would dare stand against Jihad.
Notable that the non-Muslim victims of Jihad terror are never considered “teflon” in this way…
The Voice crying the the wilderness says
Sneaky MSM frames this as Donald Trump issue.
When are the MSM going to ask Hillary what sacrifices she has made? *Never*
Would she have voted for war, if she knew his son would be killed? *Of course*
Will she grant herself extra-constitutional powers as POTUS, like Obama? *Obviously*
Is he trying to save his lucrative job getting Muslims immigrated in the US? *Bingo!*
How many voters bought his hyperbole? *Bunches!*