• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Jihadists are “weaponizing political correctness” and tricking us, former Defense Dept official warns

Jul 4, 2016 10:53 am By Christine Douglass-Williams

Despite the devastation being wrought throughout the globe by Islamic jihadists, and the accelerated threat to the West since the emergence of the Islamic State, Western leaders continue to minimize this threat, believe jihadist propaganda, and adhere to political correctness.

Jihadists were slaughtering long before the Islamic State appeared, but the Islamic State’s zeal for conquest and destruction have taken the savagery to new levels, particularly with the persuasiveness of its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who is well-grounded in Islamic theology and law, and wields them to stir fanaticism and militancy among his following.

Baghdadi — who has a Ph.D. in Islamic studies — is all the more dangerous particularly given the traditional rigidity of Islam, as Muslim scholars, leaders, mullahs and clerics are the only respected sources to interpret the immutable decrees of Islamic texts. Baghdadi is also well versed in the strategies of the more stealthy Muslim Brotherhood.

Leftist Westerners remain clueless as to the nature of this jihadist war against us. Former Department of Defense official Rich Higgins said in an interview that he knew that America was losing the war on terror when Omar Mateen pledged his allegiance to the Islamic State and went on his rampage at the Pulse nightclub. Higgins stated that jihadists are “‘weaponizing political correctness’ and using narratives to collapse our understanding of the enemy and how to battle them.”

Rich Higgins

“Former DOD Official Warns America Is On The Wrong Track To Fighting War On Terror [VIDEO],” by Ginni Thomas, Daily Caller, July 2, 2016:

Former Department of Defense official Rich Higgins knew America was losing the war on terror when a terrorist attacked the Pulse bar in Orlando, killing 49 people and injuring over 50.

Higgins’ sister-in-law asked him if he was doing all he could to fight this enemy after seeing the carnage of innocent life. Now, Higgins is taking considerable risk to speak truthfully about the lack of strategic policy in our government’s war on terror.

In this exclusive video interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation, the former Department of Defense official explains how Islamists are “weaponizing political correctness” and using narratives to collapse our understanding of the enemy and how to battle them.

His expertise is political warfare and developing strategies to battle against the ideologies and tactics used to carry out terror attacks.

Political warfare includes both non-violent and violent actions working in synthesis, Higgins says. The left, with enemy-friendly Muslim Brotherhood allies, is able to control the dominant cultural narrative with the media and the government, blinding us in the war on terror and impacting how Americans think, he argues.

Higgins calls for a “strategic and operational pause” in America’s misguided battle to stop the terror. He would, instead, ask new leadership to develop a comprehensive political warfare plan, while removing the subversive policies and personnel causing America to lose this paramount battle.

He cites the “purges” carried out by law enforcement and intelligence officials throughout government, which Phil Haney…and Steve Coughlin have made public….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Jihad in the West Tagged With: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Department of Defense, Omar Mateen, Pulse, Rich Higgins, War on terror


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jerry says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 11:23 am

    Every once in a while a new voice of reason emerges, and isn’t it encouraging? Thankfully I think we’re going to be seeing more of this, as people are realizing our side has the better argument. And they also see all the dead bodies piling up and are looking for answers. And of course the answer is all too clear, islamic doctrine teaches this violence to a billion+ muslims. Everyone knows the power of religion to influence minds and behavior. So naturally the reason becomes obvious, especially when one considers there has never, NEVER, been any rational alternative explanation as to why muslims are killing in the name allah. There’s not a lot of wriggle room to squeeze in another reason when the violent acts are so in tune with what their doctrine teaches. There’s a reason Nazism was outlawed after the last big war. The allies knew the power of persuasion it had and did not want a resurgence of that evil. Please tell me, why in the hell should we see islam as any different?

    • Jerry says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 11:40 am

      I should have said “outlawed Nazism in GERMANY,” but you all knew what I meant.

      Article II of the Potsdam agreement makes it clear, not that it has any relevance to this topic.

      https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Potsdam_Agreement

    • Budvarakbar says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 12:28 pm

      Islam is even worse than Nazi-ism — at least Hitler was honest enough not to claim divine inspiration

      • Jerry says

        Jul 4, 2016 at 1:03 pm

        And not only that, Hitler didn’t have political correctness and the myth of multiculturalism to grease his path to world domination as does islam. Muslims are accomplishing under the guise of religion as much as Hitler did with massive armies and superb weaponry, and we’re helping them do it. We really have become sheep to slaughter for these muslims. We’re weak, and we all know how the weak end up in this Darwinian world of ours.

      • Jan Aage Jeppesen says

        Jul 4, 2016 at 2:14 pm

        “at least Hitler was honest enough not to claim divine inspiration.”

        Actually Hitler did invoke divine inspiration to justify persecution of Jews. Apart from praising Martin Luthers Jew hatred he also wrote the following in Mein Kampf:

        “Hence today I believe I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord,” (p. 65).

        • Mirren10 says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 5:04 pm

          “Hence today I believe I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord,” (p. 65).”

          That was simply a sop to the German Catholic Church; a rationale. In his Table Talk, and private conversations, Hitler despised Christianity and spoke of how superior islam was to ‘flabby Christianity’.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 7:27 pm

          Mirren, Budvarakbar, Jerry, Jan Aage Jeppesen and anyone who is interested in
          the connection between Fascism and Islamism—here is a concise article.

          The impact of the Muslim Brotherhood

          A MUST READ for anyone who wants to understand the Muslim Brotherhood.

          http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/hitlers-legacy-islamic-antisemitism-and-the-impact-of-the-muslim-brotherhood

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 8:09 pm

          Thanks Mark Swan, This Matthias Kuntzel guy looks to be a great source of information.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 5, 2016 at 12:52 am

          You are welcome Ted Tyler—yes He is a good Writer.

        • Jerry says

          Jul 5, 2016 at 9:46 am

          Yeah thanks for that link Mark, I’ll read it after I mow the lawn. Or maybe I won’t mow the lawn and I’ll just read it, I haven’t decided yet.;)

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 5, 2016 at 10:29 pm

          Youre welcome Jerry—Take Care

        • Jay Boo says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 11:08 am

          You fanatical atheists will latch onto anything to suggest that Christianity is no better than Islam.

          What amazes me is how so many atheists flaunt their supposed objectivity and reason then run foaming at the mouth like a bloodthirsty mob at such Christian conspiracy gibberish.
          Remember that the vast majority of Atheist websites are profoundly anti-Christian and kiss Muzzie butts.

          I am surprised that you did not bring up the Nazi “God is with us” belt buckles. Hitler probably was inspired by a Muslim cell mate hollering Allahu Akbar

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 10:19 am

          True, MIrren. Hitler despised Christianity. The only faith he *admired* was Islam, because it is a conqueror’s creed.

          Mark, thank you for that excellent article by Matthias Küntzel. One small disagreement–he says:

          “This is also not the kind of hostility to Jews found in the Koran. We are dealing here with a hardcore antisemitism which dehumanises and demonises Jews and which has a great deal in common with Nazi ideology.”

          Actually, this is *exactly* the antisemitism one finds in the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the actions of the brutal “Prophet”, who at one point beheaded up to 900 unarmed Jews, then enslaved their wives and children.

          It is not that Muslims are made more hateful by exposure to the horrific legacy of the Nazis; just that they are given a ‘modern’ model for genocidal antisemitism.

          As we have seen in umpteen articles here at Jihad Watch, Muslims despise Infidels, but so often make an exception for Adolf Hitler, whom they praise and respect.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 8, 2016 at 3:08 am

          gravenimage I simply took it for what He said—

          “This is not merely the ‘normal’ anti-Semitism of racial prejudice or religious and social discrimination. This is also not the kind of hostility to Jews found in the Koran. We are dealing here with a hardcore antisemitism which dehumanises and demonises Jews and which has a great deal in common with Nazi ideology.”

          He is saying through this period of involvement with Fascism that is has taken on an
          intensity and made a driver for hate—not that the Quran does not have dark anti-Jew views already there, the theme is diabolical obsession with the Jews.

          That is only my take on it.

          This article for me ilustrates a real and clear connection with Islam and Fascism in the Muslim brotherhood—the modern Islamic threat.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 6:40 pm

      There’s another link between Fascism and Islam, as well–the West was mired in denial about the threat of both for far too long. It is largely forgotten today, but many leaders and media outlets actually whitewashed and even lauded Fascism and the Nazis, and slandered those warning against the threat as “hysterics” and even–ludicrously–“warmongers”. Shades of today…

      • Mark Swan says

        Jul 5, 2016 at 10:32 pm

        Yes History can be repeated

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 5, 2016 at 10:46 pm

          And sadly so often is, Mark.

      • Mirren10 says

        Jul 6, 2016 at 10:43 am

        ”It is largely forgotten today, but many leaders and media outlets actually whitewashed and even lauded Fascism and the Nazis, and slandered those warning against the threat as “hysterics” and even–ludicrously–“warmongers”. Shades of today.”

        Exactly, graven. It’s that which gives me hope eventually we **will** get off our arses, get some fire in the belly, and **fight back**. Against **islam**, not just it’s hideous manifestations such as the Islamic state, boko haram et al.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm

          Exactly, Mirren. While it is grim proof that we continue to make the same mistakes historically in underestimating and even refusing to recognize threats against us, the good side of this is that those warning about Fascism *did* eventually win through.

          There are differences, of course–history never repeats *exactly*–but it is close enough that I actually do believe we will finally be able to wake people up to the threat of Islam.

  2. Angemon says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 11:24 am

    In this exclusive video interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation, the former Department of Defense official explains how Islamists are “weaponizing political correctness” and using narratives to collapse our understanding of the enemy and how to battle them.

    He’s right, of course, and “political correctness” is being used here in the same sense it had on the Communist Russia from where it originated and was exported to Western nations through decades of Russian infiltration and propaganda – people who don’t have the “correct” “political” ideas will face repercussions. You criticize islam? Well, you’re a bigot. Oh, and muslims will f***ing kill you. But you deserved it, you bigot. Much easier – not to mention safer – to nod one’s head and go with the flow. Kudos to Rich Higgins for not being afraid to speak the truth to the powers that be.

  3. Jaladhi says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 11:29 am

    Its Muslims who are weaponizing political correctness and not the jihadis. Jihadis who are Muslims are taking full advantage of it! Muslims are the back room planners and jihadis are the warriors

    • Budvarakbar says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 12:33 pm

      You have fallen for the OC crap — they are one and the same — your ‘back room guys’ are participating in jihad such as much – maybe more so tha the dufuses that go on the suicide missions!

      And remember they ALL read the same Koran – from Gibraltar to the P.I.

    • Eur says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 12:45 pm

      while ago I saw a video on youtube , was about the “myths and lies there on Islam ” , was a local television station that is in Cordoba ( Spain ) .Iman confirmed everything , about the dhimmis ( he traslated the word as the protected ones and said it as according to the good thing ) , the universal caliphate … everything. basically said the same thing rato isis only with good words. All imans explain the same , Islam is unique and is contrary to democracy. Its clear . You can see the vídeo on YouTube… Is in spanish.

      • rabrooks says

        Jul 7, 2016 at 10:11 am

        Ange, I’ve never seen it put so simply. And it’s that simplicity that all the anger vitriol is being aimed at. Simply being able to explain the ‘ism. makes you a racist? We need help…

  4. abad says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 11:31 am

    The solution is VERY simple.

    STOP allowing people (Muslims) who want to kill us (Muslims) into the United States.

    They hate us.

    They come here for ONE reason ONLY.

    To kill us.

    As for that Orlando Jihadi – his family was no “Syrian refugee” they were from Afghanistan.

    Deport the lot of them now.

    • Donna says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 3:35 pm

      Agreed.
      The “PC Witch Hunt” around here is so bad you’d be shocked, Muslimes and Hillary are giving it every $$$ they’ve got to “keep everyone in line” :-/

    • Carmel says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 9:50 pm

      And even second generation if needed.

  5. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 12:39 pm

    The term political correctness is self defeating. Not only because it imbues its practitioners with the possibility of being correct, but because it offers no negative analysis. If you’re politically correct, you’re by implication not right, but not necessarily that wrong, maybe just inarticulate. Worst, no subterfuge is attributed to one who practices political correctness; they’re wrong, but don’t necessarily believe what they claim to for deceptive purposes. They’re naive and maybe a little bit stupid is all.

    Me, I substitute the term fictive reality, where the political correctness practitioner really *does* believe the basis of what he’s saying; he really believes in moderate Islam and moderate Moslems. And this works because most of the “facts” underlying his premise are undisputed as if they were true. This is how you have unanimity on the two Fox RINO TV channels about the basic goodness of Islam, as if it were true. To make a fictive reality work, one must studiously avoid checking the facts. Global warming is another example of this. So it is not feasible for the news entertainers on Fox RINO to even attempt to resolve the fictive reality of Islam by, say, quoting the world takeover mass murder commands in the Holy Ko-Ran or the examples Moslems are commanded by Allah to emulate in the Hah-Deaths.

    So Islam is ok. Not because it’s politically correct, but because of the fictive reality that it is good, it has good facts. It doesn’t, but who’s gonna read the Holy Ko-Ran with an open mind?

    • Mirren10 says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 5:08 pm

      Me, I think ‘political correctness’ and ‘ fictive reality’ are both crap. What we’re dealing with is **lies**.

      • Mark Swan says

        Jul 4, 2016 at 7:28 pm

        Absolutely I Agree

      • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

        Jul 5, 2016 at 2:01 pm

        I don’t think the *concept* of fictive reality is crap. For example, thousands of school districts have instructed grade school students on anthropogenic global warming, and without a shred of proof, or even a mention that the globe has been cooling. Many students were reported distressed and even depressed.

        The key point is that a falsehood becomes so widely accepted as true it may as well be, even if it isn’t. At least with fake climate science there is still some small room for public argument. Not so with Islam.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 10:54 am

          ”I don’t think the *concept* of fictive reality is crap.”

          What I meant, APF, is that it is a lie, as you’ve noted.

          ”At least with fake climate science there is still some small room for public argument. Not so with Islam.”

          Don’t you think there are some signs of cracks in the façade ? I do.

          The other day, Channel 4 in the UK interviewed **Geert Wilders**. Whilst they tried to present him as a ‘racist’, they didn’t cut his reply, which was that *islam* is racist, not he, and that islam is incompatible with democracy.

          They also noted he must travel everywhere with bodyguards, as he is under threat from ‘islamists’. Now, *muslims* would have been a better word choice, and they are still beating the ‘racist’ horse, nevertheless, I consider it a hopeful sign, since up till now, Mr Wilders was persona non grata on UK media.

          Always good to read your caustic and often amusing comments, APF.

  6. R Cole says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    Listen to the author of “See Something, Say Nothing” Philip Haney’s account of how bad it really is. [Must See Video]

    The removal of Islam and jihad terms is not just semantics folks!!

    According to Haney and others all the surveillance work on radical mosques and their breadcrumb trail of connections have been purged – as well as Islamist anti-American types have been placed in advisory positions for the very government departments meant to protect the people from terrorism.

    Not only do you need to remove these hostiles or Muslim Brotherhood-types – it might also be a good idea to bring back some of those who were let go – to act as advisers in order to fill in some of the blanks left and possibly to restore some of the intelligence purged under the Obama administration.

    DHS Whistleblower Exposes Government’s Submission To Jihad (FULL Press Conference)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBxvSB0jdw0

    Shorter version covering only Philip Haney

    • Jerry says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 1:30 pm

      Wow, that was powerful. He’s doing a good job sharing his testimony. He describes himself as a nerdy entomologist. I gotta say, I wish we had more nerds like this. I’m grateful for his efforts, he’s got guts and he cares about the truth.

    • Carmel says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 9:56 pm

      Once you have watch this video , watch all others attached to it and suggested by YT .

  7. Ex-muslim says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    If Americans want to elect people who can defend them from Islamic fascists they should elect people like the man in the video, the (Former DOD). I only disagree when he said at (mark 1:24) that “one thousand and two hundred” people have been killed by muslim jihadists out side Iraq and Syria! Actually within, this month of Ramadan, according to (thereligionofpeace.com) website over 1600 are killed and Ramadan is not even over yet! He is probably talking the number of Westerners murdered by muslim jihadists but when you add up the number of innocent people murdered by muslim jihadists around the globe in this year alone, it is in the Tens of Thousands or even more!

  8. mortimer says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 1:24 pm

    A brilliant, insightful phrase: Jihadists are “weaponizing political correctness”.

    In a war against totalitarians, their ideology is a weapon.

    Without fighting the DOCTRINE OF JIHAD, the DOCTRINE OF THE KAFIR, and the DOCTRINE OF ISLAMIC APARTHEID (al Walaa wal Baraa), we cannot win the fight against Islamic terrorism.

    To all Leftards I repeat: IT’S THE IDEOLOGY, STUPID.

  9. Wellington says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    What is really needed is a full awareness that Islam is required to wage war on all humanity “until all religion is with Allah.” {Sura 8:39}

    So, when a fool like Obama says that America will never wage a war against Islam, there resides in such a statement a capitulation from the outset which goes way beyond just mere political correctness. Islam is indeed waging war against America and the West (and everywhere else as well to the extent it can) and the proper response MUST be to wage war against it. Yes, in the final analysis, war must be waged against Islam—–and all of Islam, not just so-called radical Islam or (how I detest this term) Islamism. This war can be cold often times and not hot and thus can also be waged by way of covert intelligence operations and a policy of containment.

    The whole religion is waging war against us and thus we must wage war against the whole religion. Not there yet. Damn shame since Islam is the oldest and best disguised form of evil of all time——–all of it.

    • Debi Brand says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 2:30 am

      “The whole religion is waging war against us and thus we must wage war against the whole religion.”

      Excellent post there, Well. Across the board.

      Absent your stated need action, aimlessly, at great cost, we spar with the wind.

  10. Ted Tyler says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    The “Great Courses” is currently offering a course by Eamonn Gearon entitled: “Turning Points in Middle Eastern History”.

    In Lecture 2, “Muhammad and the Dawn of Islam”, Gearon tells us: “Islam’s prophet, Muhammad, preached a message of social justice from the earliest stage of his mission.
    Consider the following words from Muhammad’s sermon – two months before his death:

    “All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white person has no superiority over a black person, nor a black any superiority over white except by piety and good action.””
    “Even as the fingers of the two hands are equal, so are human beings equal to one another. No one has any right, nor any preference to claim over another. You are brothers.”

    Gearon continues: “Perhaps such empowering lessons and the positive social changes that rose from them during Muhammad’s lifetime are unknown or are overlooked in the West today…..”

    Here, Gearon is painting a very dangerous and erroneous picture of Muhammad by omitting the bad and simply focusing on the good. If a person saves a child from being run over by a car and then goes about murdering 10 people, this does not make the person a hero. Yet, this is exactly what Gearon is doing. By starting off the course by creating an image of Muhammad as a good guy, a reformer, and a person dedicated to social justice, Gearon prejudices his students to view Muhammad as a “Man of Peace”.

    Now that Gearon has done his damage to the minds of his students, he can simply sit back, relax, and wait for “confirmation bias” to set in. Now any information that the students get will be filtered. That is, information that suggests that Muhammad is bad – will be rejected and quickly forgotten. But information that suggests that Muhammad is good – will be accepted and retained.

    Eamonn Gearon is a professorial lecturer in African Studies, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. So here we have a respected professor – from a respected University – who is clearly an authority figure. The students would expect that he would give them “The Truth, The Whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth”. How could they possibly know that he is giving them only half of the Apple – and that the other half is rotten?

    Eamonn Gearon probably doesn’t even know that he is a tool of the Stealth Jihadists. Yet it seem inconceivable to me that he would be unaware of the atrocities committed in the name of Islam and the psychological tricks that Islam uses to advance its religious and political agenda. Perhaps he is aware of the real Muhammad, but does not want to say anything bad about Islam so that he won’t get fired.

    Note: I am currently in lecture 2 of 36. I expect to finish this course in late August 2016.

    • Wellington says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 2:12 pm

      Re Gearon I am reminded here of what I posted yesterday on another thread at JW about academics and that is La Rochefoucauld’s astute observation that “The most trying fools are the bright ones.” And good luck with the rest of the lectures. I’m not so sure I could stand them.

    • Greyhound Fancier says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 4:54 pm

      Thanks for taking the course. Please keep reporting back. If I were watching it, I’d probably want to throw something at the screen.

    • Mirren10 says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 5:12 pm

      ”Eamonn Gearon is a professorial lecturer in African Studies, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.”

      ”African studies.”

      Rolling on the floor, laughing my arse off, whilst puking on the carpet. What a pathetic joke.

      • Wellington says

        Jul 4, 2016 at 7:04 pm

        All “Studies” programs are a joke, Mirren, though I strongly suspect you already know this. Whether African Studies, Latin American Studies, Women Studies, Gay Studies, et al., they all come with an agenda, with a victim-oriented, self-pitying mindset, often times a damn outright mendacious “zeitgeist” as well. They are evidence of the corruption of the pursuit of truth at institutions of higher learning which have become, in effect, institutions of lower learning.

        I hope you don’t think me too American for wishing you a Happy Fourth of July. But damn, the birth of an independent America is one of the greatest events in history even though it came at the expense of one of the greatest nations in history—–Britain.

        Hope you and yours are doing well. BTW, loved the Brexit vote though I see many sore losers on the Left are trying to overturn it. Ah, so typical since the Left is all for diversity and freedom as long as you agree with it. What hypocrites. Take care, my friend.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 7:25 pm

          Dear Wellington, a very Happy Fourth of July, to you !.

          Yes, aren’t all these ‘Studies’ programs nauseating, and so pompously nonsensical. As you have said so often, we live in an Age of Nonsense.

          As for Brexit, and the vicious, traitorous idiots trying to overturn it, it was only to be expected; hypocrites all, as you say. Poor old Boris has been shafted by Gove, and the vile May has thrown her hat in the ring. Blech. Ah well, we live in interesting times, don’t we ?

          You take care too, Wellington. I hope you had a fine Independence Day, seasoned with judicial amounts of Yuengling ! 🙂

        • Mirren10 says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 7:28 pm

          That should have been ‘judicious’, *not* ‘judicial’. 🙂

        • Wellington says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 8:16 pm

          So impressed, Mirren, that you remembered and mentioned Yuengling, which brewery is THE oldest in America and located in my home state of Pennsylvania——–1829, though such a date, while the Middle Ages for an American, is, understandably, just yesterday for a Brit. I remember quite well being with my wife in a 15th-century inn in Eton and just reveling, as my better half did, in being in such an old establishment while enjoying a fine repast. Ditto for sundry century-old eateries in Devon and Cornwall, which historic counties both I and my wife found treasurable beyond words.

          I esteem Britannia even though I have no British blood in me. It is where the Mother of Parliaments exists. It is where democracy was reborn (with fits and starts to be sure) after its demise in ancient Greece. My great dream, which I will never allow to die, is a coalition of the five major Anglo-Saxon powers—–Britain, America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand——in an economic, cultural, military, et al. alliance. We’d be a match for any other alliance, easily so———-and we would be the most decent and productive alliance ever formed, emphasizing ideas and character above all, with race, ethnicity and gender being of only some insignificant biological characteristic. As an example, for true conservatives, for those who think correctly and can appreciate the enormous contribution to civilization which Britain has made through the centuries, it would be infinitely preferable to have nine black conservative women on the Supreme Court of the United States than to have nine white liberal men on said court. Modern leftists will never understand this. Never.

          Again, my best to you and those you hold most dear. Always look forward to your comments here at JW. Only a fool would not. Take good care, my British friend.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 4, 2016 at 8:23 pm

          Happy Independence Day to You Two, and everyone else here as well.

      • gravenimage says

        Jul 5, 2016 at 7:45 pm

        Good stuff from Mirren, Wellington, and Mark.

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 1:44 am

      Consider what Gearon conveniently left out from Muhammad’s Last Sermon, something even more memorable:

      Tabari IX:113 “You have a right over your wives and they have a right over you. You have the right that they should not cause anyone of whom you dislike to tread your beds; and that they should not commit any open indecency. If they do, then Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from (evil), they have the right to food and clothing. Treat women well for they are like domestic animals with you and they do not possess anything themselves. Allah has made the enjoyment of their bodies lawful in his Qur’an.”

      Another empowering lesson from Muhammad overlooked in the West today, even by “Great Courses”.

      • Ted Tyler says

        Jul 5, 2016 at 3:02 am

        Jack, Yes, Clearly a case of altering reality by showing only one side of the apple. I particularly like:

        “Treat women well for they are like domestic animals with you and they do not possess anything themselves. Allah has made the enjoyment of their bodies lawful in his Qur’an.”

        I wonder how the Social Justice Warriors would react to that one.

      • gravenimage says

        Jul 5, 2016 at 7:47 pm

        True, Jack and Ted. Hardly the equality and women’s rights apologists like to pretend is part of Islam.

    • jamesmi says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 1:35 pm

      Mohammed is routinely – not always, indeed, but routinely – referred to as a prophet by kaffir Western commentators, with no qualifiers or disclaimers to suggest he is being so described simply because Muslims so regard him.

      As a Catholic, maybe I’m biassed, but I find the contrast to how Jesus Christ is commonly spoken of quite amazing. Is His status among those of us who believe in Him treated with the same respect ? Do the media rebuke and denounce Christianophobia ?

      There is a danger here of Christian self-pity and over-sensitiveness, no doubt of that; it is not as though Christianity in general ot Catholicism in particular had a flawless historical record, or were or should be immune to criticism. But Islam and Mohammed seem to be treated with a mildness that, compared with how Christ and Christianity are treated, seems inexplicable.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 7:43 pm

      Ted, thank you for having the patience to sit through that ugly claptrap from Eamonn Gearon’s course. It is even worse, though–Muhammed never preached racial equality (he referred to Ethiopians as “raisin heads”), and the idea that he ever enjoined “social justice” is a ludicrous rewriting of history.

      Whitewash of evil, from beginning to end.

      He is a textbook useful idiot–he cheerfully writes about Muslim invasions here:

      “Arab Invasions: The First Islamic Empire”

      http://www.historytoday.com/eamonn-gearon/arab-invasions-first-islamic-empire

  11. Cthulhu says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 2:28 pm

    Muslims are allowed to openly hate gays, Jews, Christians, atheists, apostates and even dogs in our countries, but we are not allowed to criticise them because it’s not political correct. Bullsh.t!!!

    Muslim taxi driver refuses to take disabled passenger with a guide dog:

    • Carmel says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 10:06 pm

      That taxi driver is a real bigot . Muhammad said « working dogs » were allowed.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 7:52 pm

      There have been many stories covered here at Jihad Watch about Muslims refusing guide dogs–in one case they even attacked the service dog.

  12. rubiconcrest says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 3:19 pm

    Good to know that there are many whistle blowers waiting in the wings to come forward if they get the protection they need. Sadly, they have to be protected by from their own government.

    • Mark Swan says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 10:51 pm

      Hopefully that will change soon, and all those aching to tell it all can.

  13. DHazard says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 4:57 pm

    There are a whole lot of groups that are “off limits” when it comes to voicing factual observations. Basically anybody who isn’t a Christian white heterosexual male (except for the ones who blame themselves for everything wrong with the world.)

  14. Guest says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 8:39 pm

    How about you tell us something we don’t know?

    • Mark Swan says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 11:22 pm

      Have You heard any of The presidents praise for Mrs. Clinton on the campaign trail—that is
      steeling tax payer money right there in the open for all to see—we pay him to be the President
      and it cost a fortune for Him to go anywhere in public—nice guy this one.

      Mr. Higgins advice to “develop a comprehensive political warfare plan, while removing the subversive policies and personnel causing America to lose this paramount battle.”

      He cites the “purges” carried out by law enforcement and intelligence officials throughout government.”

      Shows good reason for this subversive, divisive, anti American President to be on the campaign trail
      for a surrogate who will not hesitate to keep up the good work—and keep it in the family.

  15. killerjools says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    “Baghdadi — who has a Ph.D. in Islamic studies”

    Is that even a real degree?

    • Carmel says

      Jul 4, 2016 at 10:07 pm

      Yes . Like Reza Aslan degree. HA ! Ha! Ha!

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 1:49 am

      Well, his degree allows him to issue fatwas and sanction jihad murder. What does your degree
      allow you to do?

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 7:55 pm

      He got it from the Islamic University of Baghdad. That’s about as real as things get for Mohammedans. BS by actual academic standards, but he does know his Islam.

      • Mark Swan says

        Jul 6, 2016 at 5:49 am

        Islamic Studies—Simon says this is in the Quran, Simon say this not in the Quran,
        this is in the Quran—hey, not that, Simon did not say. You bet.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 4:40 pm

          I always find the idea of “Islamic scholars” pretty ludicrous.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 5:40 pm

          I guess I am missing the point here, but to me, an Islamic Scholar is simply someone who knows a lot about Islam. So would not Robert Spencer be an Islamic Scholar?

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 5:44 pm

          Guessing: “I always find the idea of “Islamic scholars” pretty ludicrous” — because many people to claim to be Islamic Scholars are not scholars. They are simply Islamic apologists.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 6:32 pm

          Hi, Ted. I see I was not very clear here–thanks for pointing that out. I do always aim for clarity, but sometimes miss my mark.

          Of course, I have *enormous* respect for Robert Spencer and others such as David Wood, who have studied the foul tenets of Islam in-depth and use that knowledge to counter Taqiyya and the whitewash of Islam.

          What I meant is that Islam itself is such a grim and ultimately banal subject. Except for those defending against it–and I include myself here, albeit in a minor way–who but an ignorant bully would *want* to study Islam? It is arid, irrational, and grotesquely ugly.

          Considering all the richness of the world–science, history, the arts–Islam is a sick and hideous subject. Someone like al-Baghdadi must be acknowledged for his Islamic knowledge–but I have no respect for him as a real scholar, any more than all the rest of the pious thugs.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 5:36 am

          Mr. Spencer is an expert on Islam—his field of study includes reality, honesty, decency,
          integrity, common sense, and a love and respect for personal freedom—these are virtues
          you will not find these Islamic practitioners understanding, there field of study does not
          include these subjects.

  16. Jay Boo says

    Jul 4, 2016 at 10:09 pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp891YJw_VY

    The View’s Islamic ‘scholars’ Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg fail to put words into Bill O’Reilly’s mouth (despite Bill being surrounded by libtards) on “The View” and walk of their own stage in a hissy fit unable to defend their delusions about Islam.

    • Ted Tyler says

      Jul 6, 2016 at 5:58 pm

      The View is not a good forum for exchanging ideas. I see people screaming and yelling at each other and I could only hear a fraction of what was said. I would like to see Joy plus Whoopi versus Bill O’Reilly in a standard debate format. Each side has exactly 5 minutes to speak. Then the other side takes over.

  17. Mubarak says

    Jul 5, 2016 at 1:24 am

    “Former Department of Defense official Rich Higgins said in an interview that he knew that America was losing the war on terror when Omar Mateen pledged his allegiance to the Islamic State and went on his rampage at the Pulse nightclub.” —

    It was strategic blunder of Omar Mateen to kill gays. If anything symbolizes the barrenness of the West – in stark contrast to Muslim fecundity – it is the two complementary phenomena feminism with free abortions and the gay movement with gay marriage as the crown jewel in the hands of Muslims. Muslims should be in the forefront fighting for these movements, but they seem to be too stupid to understand the implications. The West will inevitably fall as a ripe fruit in the turban of Islam when these suicidal aspirations of the West gains further momentum and reach their climax.

    Let Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton with their staff of eunuchs rule the world, and Muslims can with a smirk put down their weapons, loosen their suicide belts and wait for a peaceful takeover.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 8:15 pm

      The repulsive Mubarak wrote:

      It was strategic blunder of Omar Mateen to kill gays. If anything symbolizes the barrenness of the West – in stark contrast to Muslim fecundity – it is the two complementary phenomena feminism with free abortions and the gay movement with gay marriage as the crown jewel in the hands of Muslims.
      ………………………………………..

      A “strategic blunder”–note that the vile Mubarak has no *moral* problem with his foul coreligionists slaughtering gay people–he just supposedly considers it a tactical error.

      The repellent Mubarak has already justified the Muslim rape of little boys in the West because we are so (supposedly) decadent. Here’s what he had to say after a Muslim raped a little six-year-old boy in Germany:

      “If the West was more careful with its own moral hygiene and e.g. stopped the war on boys and masculinity (Christina Hoff Sommers), it wouldn’t be so susceptible to these opportunistic Islamic infections.
      The wrestling event in Munich was probably an American and feminist inspired, inter-gender wrestling event, where no distinction is made between boys and girls, so how could the refugee from Afghanistan tell the difference?
      Not that an “interference” with a girl would be that much better, but it would assert
      some higher degree of normality although misdirected and criminal. –
      Why did the father leave his son alone in the cabin, by the way —? A symbolic picture of the incident and of father-son relations these days.”

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/germany-muslim-migrant-sexually-assaults-6-year-old-boy-in-changing-room#comment-1433792

      He goes on to say this:

      I am suggesting to the readers, that the relentless efforts to extinguish sex differences in the West is an invitation to Islam. Feminism and homosexuality are complimentary phenomena well suitable to veil and obscure the difference between men and women…”

      Lots more ugliness from him on that thread–all to the idea that Muslim savagery is *our fault*. he does not, of course, ever address why Muslims are also waging violent Jihad in parts of the world not encouraging of gay rights.

      More:

      Muslims should be in the forefront fighting for these movements, but they seem to be too stupid to understand the implications. The West will inevitably fall as a ripe fruit in the turban of Islam when these suicidal aspirations of the West gains further momentum and reach their climax.
      ………………………………………..

      He has stated this before–that any equality invites Muslim invasion–which is, of course, absolute crap. It is this sort of “political correctness” that blinds us to the danger Islam represents–it is not that the West deserves to fall to the horror of Islam.

      More:

      Let Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton with their staff of eunuchs rule the world, and Muslims can with a smirk put down their weapons, loosen their suicide belts and wait for a peaceful takeover.
      ………………………………………..

      These women are fools–but it is not their gender that makes them so. There are many men just as clueless as they are.

      I’d like to see Mubarak try to pull this crap with someone like Golda Meir or Margaret Thatcher–they would not put up with this bs.

      • Mubarak says

        Jul 6, 2016 at 4:00 am

        GI seems to be so complacent about the West.
        Here are some quotations from AMERICA ALONE, worth reflecting on.
        Mark Steyn:
        “The Muslim critique of the West–that we’re decadent vulgar narcissist fornicating sodomites–is not without more than a grain of truth.” —
        “In their bizarre prioritization of “a woman’s right to choose,” feminists have helped ensure that European women will end their days in a culture that doesn’t accord women the right to choose anything.” —
        “And yet even those who understand very clearly the nature of Islam are complacent about Europe’s own structural defects.” —

        • Mark Swan says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 5:53 am

          You speak for Yourself Mubarak—and it is not a pretty picture.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 5:52 pm

          The sickening Mubarak wrote:

          GI seems to be so complacent about the West.
          …………………………..

          Actually, I am often quite critical of the West–including on this very thread.

          The prevalence of “political correctness”–especially vis-a-vis the threat of Islam–is suicidal.

          More:

          Here are some quotations from AMERICA ALONE, worth reflecting on.
          Mark Steyn:
          “The Muslim critique of the West–that we’re decadent vulgar narcissist fornicating sodomites–is not without more than a grain of truth.” —
          …………………………..

          I own and have read “America Alone”–a fine book.

          The idea that the stalwart Mark Steyn is hence suggesting–as the vile Mubarak is–that the West as a result of its shortcomings deserves to have its citizens raped by ravening Mohammedans is grotesque.

          More:

          “In their bizarre prioritization of “a woman’s right to choose,” feminists have helped ensure that European women will end their days in a culture that doesn’t accord women the right to choose anything.” —
          “And yet even those who understand very clearly the nature of Islam are complacent about Europe’s own structural defects.” —
          …………………………..

          What Mark Steyn is pointing out is that aspects of current Western culture make it less likely that we will be able to successfully fight back against Jihad–this is something I and others here have noted *many times*.

          But this is quite different from what the foul Mubarak is positing–that we need to be raped, enslaved, and slaughtered for our shortcomings, real and imagined.

          I have always held that the free West–*even with all of our current flaws*–is so far morally superior to the horror of Islam that this *should* go without saying.

          The same is true of America and the rest of the West of the 1940s–for all of its racial and gender inequality and sometimes nasty antisemitism, it was so obviously morally superior to the horrors of Nazi Fascism that any decent person would have wanted us to prevail, as we did.

          That Mubarak does *not* want the West to prevail against a takeover by Muslim rapist thugs shows that he *has no morals*–or, rather, that he adopts the foul morals of Islam.

          Note, moreover, that what he condemns in the West are not just such matters as abortion, but our allowing gay people to live unmolested and even our allowing women to attend public New Year’s Eve celebrations.

          In other words, he believes that the West deserves to fall to Islam–unless we *adopt Shari’ah strictures ourselves*.

          That is, he wants us to submit to Islam one way or another.

          And once again, he dodges one central question: if Muslims are only targeting the West because of our decadence, then why is it that they are burning down churches in sub-Saharan Africa, beheading Christian schoolgirls in Indonesia, and raping nuns in India and Yezidi girls in the Islamic State? All of these victims are culturally conservative–they are not Western decadents–but they are being raped, enslaved, and murdered by pious Muslims nonetheless.

          Also, note what he wants to replace the ‘decadence’ of the West *with*–Muslims robbing, raping, and enslaving women and little boys.

          Does any decent person consider this morally superior to even the greatest excesses of the West? No, but devout Muslims *do*.

        • Angemon says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 7:50 pm

          gravenimage posted:

          “I have always held that the free West–*even with all of our current flaws*–is so far morally superior to the horror of Islam that this *should* go without saying.”

          Damn straight – greatest civilization in the history of Mankind.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 6, 2016 at 6:33 pm

          True, Mark.

        • Baruch says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 1:13 am

          Please explain the moral superiority of more than one million babies killed a year in the USA and the horror-regime of Planned Parenthood!

        • Mubarak says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 1:36 am

          PS: “A falling camel attracts a lot of knives.” – Arab saying Mark Steyn quotes in AMERICA ALONE.
          Apparently living babies do too.

        • Mubarak says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 11:39 am

          Ted Tyler: What you are after with your evil, catching and entangling questions is to find an entrance and a moral standpoint from where to justify abortions no matter the motivation. No answer shall be given you.

        • Angemon says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 4:21 pm

          Mubarak posted:

          “Ted Tyler: What you are after with your evil, catching and entangling questions is to find an entrance and a moral standpoint from where to justify abortions no matter the motivation. No answer shall be given you.”

          Morality can never be enforced top-down. You think abortion is immoral and people shouldn’t do it? Fine. You want to enforce your morality on others and prevent them from legally and safely doing something that they’ll probably do anyway, although in an unsafe fashion and risking being jailed for it? Not cool. You’re not the final judge, are you? Feminists want to abort a foetus after discovering it’s a male? It’s their problem. A religious person wants to have an abortion for whatever reason? That’s between them and their conscience – and their God, if there is an afterlife.

          You want to talk morality? Fine. How do you justify, morally speaking, forcing women to undergo potentially lethal ordeals?

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 5:51 pm

          Angemon wrote, re the West:

          Damn straight – greatest civilization in the history of Mankind.
          …………………………..

          Absolutely, Angemon! We have a lot to be proud of–and a great deal we need to *protect*.

      • Mubarak says

        Jul 7, 2016 at 1:27 am

        Please explain where the moral superiority of killing more than one million babies a year in the USA is and the terror regime of Planned Parenthood!

        • Champ says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 1:41 am

          “…terror regime of Planned Parenthood!”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Preposterous! And I am *completely* against abortion, but Planned Parenthood is not out “terrorizing” women and dragging them into abortion clinics and forcing them to get an abortion. Your comment is beyond absurd.

        • Mubarak says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 3:49 am

          No, they are dragging the babies out of consenting women – preferably without harming the body parts of the babies.
          Treating human beings in their fragile inception as disposable garbage or material for research is beyond terror; it is industrial production of murder.

        • Angemon says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 4:12 am

          “Terror regime”? Do you know what that means?

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 4:37 am

          Mubarak, I think that all of us will agree that abortion is a bad thing and that some of us believe that under certain circumstances abortion is the lesser of two evils. What is your view on this?:
          1. The mother has been exposed to Zika Virus. Now, the child, if born, will be without a brain.
          2. The child must be aborted to save the life of the mother.

        • Mubarak says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 9:20 am

          “Terror regime” are the words I put in the mouth of the unborn babies. What kind of words would you put in their mouth, Angemon – if you had their choice?
          And Ted Tyler: who would despise the mother, who, at the risk of her own life, decided to give life to her baby?

        • Angemon says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 9:38 am

          I asked you if you know what “terror regime” means.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 9:45 am

          A baby without a brain ?

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 9:52 am

          Mubarak,
          I see that you did not answer my questions. I know that they were very complicated questions and I know that you would have trouble dealing with them. So I will re-phrase the questions and hopefully make it simpler for you:

          1. If a baby is to be born without a brain, would it be better to abort the baby or not.

          2. If the choice for life is to be between the baby or the mother, should one save the mother or should one save the baby.

          If you have trouble with that one, perhaps we could go to multiple choice format.

        • Mubarak says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 10:52 am

          Ted Tyler: What you are after with your evil, catching and entangling questions is to find an entrance and a moral standpoint from where to justify abortions no matter the motivation. No answer shall be given you.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 11:10 am

          Sorry Mubarak, but you have already given me the answer that I was seeking.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 7, 2016 at 1:59 pm

          Mubarak wrote:

          PS: “A falling camel attracts a lot of knives.” – Arab saying Mark Steyn quotes in AMERICA ALONE.
          …………………………………..

          Again, the foul Mubarak is pretending that the stalwart Mark Steyn–of all people!–is asserting that the West deserves Muslims attacking us because they believe us to be weak.

          This vicious saying, in fact, perfectly shows the Muslim mindset.

          I do animal rescue. When I see a creature fall, my first instinct is *not* to murder it. But this is what Islam does to people’s moral sense.

          More:

          Please explain where the moral superiority of killing more than one million babies a year in the USA is and the terror regime of Planned Parenthood!
          …………………………………..

          I said that even with all our flaws that the West is far superior to the horrors of Islam. I stand by that. Never mind that his numbers are also inflated.

          Here is Mubarak–who has, just on this thread, winked at or actually lauded the massacre of dozens of peaceful people at a club, the rape of nuns and small boys, and using little girls as sex slaves.

          Are we now supposed to believe that he is presenting himself as a champion of unborn children?

          The fact is that I have *never* heard Jihadists cite abortion as their reason for attacking the West.

          It does not, in this context, matter whether one regards abortion as ‘choice’ or as the murder of babies–it is simply *not* a motive for Muslims raping, enslaving, and butchering us.

          Moreover, the idea that Islam prohibits abortion is not correct. The Maliki school of jurisprudence forbids abortion, but the Hanafi school–which the majority of Sunni Muslims follow–allows it. You find difference of opinion among the Shia, as well. Tunisia and Turkey have legalized abortions; some countries in Dar-al-Islam do not.

          But what is important is the reality on the ground. Egypt and Turkey have rates of abortion of 15 per 1,000 pregnancies–this is higher than the rate as in the United States. In Indonesia, the rate is a shocking *37* per 1,000–over two and a half times greater than rates in the US. Why isn’t Mubarak disturbed by *this*?

          He has been posting here since the beginning of the year, when he started out by lauding Muslim rapists in Cologne and other European cities. The reasons he gave for this included the West allowing women to attend public New Year’s Eve celebrations, the existence of Victoria’s Secret ads, a nude woman protester in Germany, and allowing women to take part in wrestling matches. He *never once* mentioned abortion.

          And that is because he does not care about this at all. Instead, he is just flailing around hoping to find something to justify the Jihad against the West.

          Here is the Islamic State, in fact, forcing their sex slaves to get abortions so that Muslims can continue to rape them:

          “To Maintain Supply of Sex Slaves, ISIS Pushes Birth Control”

          http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/world/middleeast/to-maintain-supply-of-sex-slaves-isis-pushes-birth-control.html

          “In at least one case, a woman was forced to have an abortion in order to make her available for sex, and others were pressured to do so…”

          “Abdal Ali said his sister, 20, was in her second trimester at the time of her capture in 2014. Still, one commander so urgently wanted her as his slave that he tried to end the pregnancy by giving her pills that would cause her to miscarry…”

          The idea that Mubarak’s coreligionists are raping and murdering us in protest of legal abortion could not be more ludicrous.

  18. Dustin Koellhoffer says

    Jul 5, 2016 at 4:34 am

    Excellent timing of this article. I’ve been working on this subject for an article on my blog at liberalsbackwardsthink.com

    • Ted Tyler says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 6:03 am

      Dustin, I checked out your blog to find that we disagree on Global Warming. to me, it seems that sea levels are rising and that the polar ice caps are melting. Check out http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3609686

      • Western Canadian says

        Jul 9, 2016 at 5:44 pm

        Sea levels have been rising since the last ice age….. Big deal,. The arctic ice levels were lower in the 1930’s…. and the antarctic are increasing.

        • Ted Tyler says

          Jul 9, 2016 at 7:25 pm

          Western, Yes, sea levels have been rising for a while now.. The original site of the Battle of Thermopylae is now under water. But this does not mean that we should be unconcerned about global warming.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 5, 2016 at 8:35 pm

      I haven’t had a chance to check out your entire site, Dustin, but your “The Refugee Jihad – the insanity of the Left’s ‘build bridges not walls’ philosophy” article is very good. Thanks.

  19. Mr. Maky Lemur says

    Jul 5, 2016 at 9:59 am

    ISLAM DELENDA EST.

  20. gravenimage says

    Jul 5, 2016 at 6:29 pm

    Jihadists are “weaponizing political correctness” and tricking us, former Defense Dept official warns
    ……………………

    Kudos to Rich Higgins for speaking the truth.

  21. Peggy says

    Jul 6, 2016 at 10:46 pm

    It’s time to kick out current officials and bring back the former ones. Maybe Trump will do exactly that.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.