Translated from the French, an editorial of Alexis Brézet, Editor of Le Figaro:
Merah, Charlie, Bataclan, Magnanville, and now Nice…How many more times until we recognize what is staring us in the face? How many more savage attacks, how many more maddened massacres, before our leaders become willing to admit that Islamic fanaticism is waging a war to the death against our country and our civilization? How many innocent victims – men, women, children – before our rulers finally decide to take the ruthless measures necessary that the barbarism of Allah’s madmen demands?
Merah, Charlie, Bataclan, Magnanville, and now Nice….More than two hundred names etched into the memory of our country, and still we have the same granitic chins, the same solemn declarations, the same tremolos in the voices. And then what? A few more soldiers in the streets, a few touch-ups to the laws, a few bombings in far-away lands, and then…nothing.
“We are at war.” There, it’s said. After so much procrastination, the phrase is now on everyone’s lips. But does anyone really believe it? “Aux armes, citoyens” [from la Marseillaise], we exclaim full-throatedly, but our arms are those of peace, of candles and hashtags and funeral processions and the procedural subtleties of our criminal code.
In truth, a phony war! We leave our borders (what soldiers call our lines) wide open to our enemies. The recruiting agents for the jihad preach their doctrine of hate with impunity, in the very mosques financed by the enemy. Those we call “traitors” who went off to fight in Syria [for the Islamic State] upon returning undergo nothing more than a simple course of “deradicalization.” As for those flagged as a “threat to national security,” who might constitute a fifth column, they roam freely because “they haven’t yet committed any crime.”
War? What war? We live as if we are at peace! The state of emergency doesn’t prevent the unions from demonstrating, nor the festive gatherings that some claim – and they are not joking – “are the best response to the Islamic State.” The president of the Republic himself appeared not to believe that there’s a war on: he calmly announced, on the fourteenth of July, the end of the state of emergency and the lifting of some security measures, before having to backtrack throughout the night, when the tragic reality brought him back to his senses…
These soldiers of the caliphate don’t wage war by halves. They come right up to us to “slit the throats of our sons and our women” [from La Marseillaise: “egorger nos fils et nos compagnes”], and in return we offer them the protection of our laws — to the very people who want to destroy us! Never before in history has an enemy benefited so much from the willingness of those he fights to accommodate him.
This willful blindness has lasted far too long. To win the war, it has to be conducted without half-measures and pusillanimity. And to give those who are fighting a chance to win, we must rearm in every sense. Rearmament for our soldiers and police, of course. Rearmament, by strengthening our laws, everywhere it proves necessary. Rearmament, by strengthening our conviction that we are in the right, to overcome collectively the perverse logic clothed in the mental rags of “living together,” which in France is used to block any serious measures being taken against the root of radical Islam, with the refrain that “that would be playing into the hands of the terrorists.” As if to say that we would fight more effectively if we presented our necks to their knives. As if the surest path to communal violence was not precisely the failure to act of the State, the only legitimate holder of power, the only real guarantor of civil peace…
Obviously, there is no miracle weapon that will do away with the hydra-headed Islamic beast. We should not minimize the risk of attacks. But is that a reason to avoid attempting anything? Certainly this war that has been declared on us will be long and difficult. We will undoubtedly suffer further defeats, which is one more reason not to lose still more time. Merah, Charlie, Bataclan, Magnanville, Nice… Now is the time to act if we want to someday bring that sinister litany to an end.

Mark says
As our friend Cato would’ve said “Ceterum censorship islamum esse delendam”
Peter Buckley says
It’s Le Pen or civil war, or both, in France within a few years:
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8489/france-the-coming-civil-war
France is most likely to follow UK out of EU:
http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/06/07/euroskepticism-beyond-brexit/pm_2016-06-07_brexit-01/
Angemon says
Good for France.
Kepha says
Allons, enfant de le patrie, le jour de gloire est arrive!
L’etandard sanglant est levee!
Salome says
As I have been saying, it is time they stopped singing La Ma swill aisle and started doing it.
abad says
Good.
Once upon a time, the French were very protective of French culture.
And it looks to me like they need to be protective – and proud – to be French.
Vive la France!
DP111 says
The Trump is right.
Newt Gingrich suggests we deport all sharia supporters from America.
Demsci says
Faced with the question; but how can we deport if no other nation wants to receive the deported? Gingrich said that we better “rethink the rules”. Or something along those lines.
And yes, we can speculate about subsidized and enforced acceptance by Muslim countries of deportees. But at the end of the day, the deportees and the possibility of deportation will have benefits.
The deportees according to Gingrich first get questioned and a choice. And of course they may lie, but this is a beginning.
The deportees leave room for other more loyal immigrants. The possibility of deportation will possibly make immigrants pause or behave better. And it can all be done with respect; when we say: Democratic citizens to Democratic Nations, and Totalitarian Muslims (because Shariah seems totalitarian to me, in a way) to Totalitarian Islamic Countries. Let people choose the one or the other and live under their preferred ideology or system.
Are human rights then so violated with such a policy??? Aren’t the human rights of ordinary democratic citizens not violated right now?
And Obama can say; “This is not who we are”, but we are not suicidal either!
Jay Boo says
But, are all Muslims our enemies?
We must be careful about saying in public that all Muslims are our enemies.
Of course, they are; that is undeniable.
Still, we must be — very careful.
JIMJFOX says
WHY??
Demsci says
I agree with Jay Boo.
Yes, we better be careful, because … Look, we are democratic or bust, we ourselves are not or should not be totalitarians. That means we depend on a 51 % majority, of voters at least, every election and formation of government, and for every major decision in parliament.
Hard core policors (political corrects) are incorrigable. But there are many people, who are determined to treat all others, including all Muslims, fairly. Who have as premise; every one (Muslim) is innocent until proven guilty.
The policors have persuaded these fairminded people to reject any and all “Sweeping statements”, “generalizations”, “stereotyping”, “painting all with one brush” of Muslims.
Many Muslims and Policors even call that racism, though it isn’t, and bigotry. And the vast majority of people does not seem to comprehend that one can distinguish between the religion and it’s followers.
So, if some of us openly declare; the whole of Islam is anti-democratic and at war with us or something like that, and since it is obvious that ALL Muslims adhere to Islam,
that will be seen by all too many non-Muslims as the same as saying “ALL Muslims are against us”, and that will be dismissed out of hand, and regarded as bigotry by a majority.
To get our workable majority we must be more subtle than just saying what we think, I suppose.
Anyway, I am for iterative thinking, or taking small steps, and do immediate evaluation, and ditch that which fails, and adopt that which works.
Jay Boo says
Thanks Demsci for that excellent follow-up.
You did a much better job than I would have done.
Demsci says
Thanks Jay Boo, that means a lot to me, coming from you.
DP111 says
France has the West’s largest Muslim population, so it can expect more and more of this. Germany will catch up soon, due to Merkel’s insanity.
There is no realistic option but to separate from Muslims. The Muslim population is growing rapidly even without the actions of Merkel.
The late Laurence Auster advocated this
· Islam is a mortal threat to our civilization.
· · But we cannot destroy Islam.
· · Nor can we democratize Islam.
· · Nor can we assimilate Islam.
· · Therefore the only way to make ourselves safe from Islam is to separate ourselves from Islam.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006854.html
Exchange Christians in Islamic countries, before they are all killed, for Muslims over here, and stop this nonsense belief that all cultures are the same. Else we are looking forward to a civil war that will make Bosnia look like a garden party. And in the end, as in every civil war, winner will take all. It will not be pretty.
duh swani says
That’s nearly all of them…But there are Quran only Muslims who reject sharia, hadith and even Mohammad…There’s not as many of them, but they are obligated to jihad like the rest of them…
Dov Berrol says
Let’s at the very least protect the Western Hemisphere. From Chile to Canada we must protect this part of the world from the dangerous word’s of Mohammed’s “Mein Kampf” – the evil Koran. From Chile to Canada: prohibit Islamic institutions and organizations just luke Saudi Arabia prohibits non-Islamic institutions. And treat the dangerous ideology of Islam as we treat Nazism. At the same time, support and protect those Muslims who have the courage to renounce this ideology and help non-Muslims fight against it.
Thunderstorm says
Unfortunately, with Justin Trudeau, our Canadian Muslim-Lover Prime Minister it will not happen.
I fear that Canada will get islamized rapidly.
Also, if Donald Trump is elected, I fear that the islamization of Canada will be even faster, because many muslims will migrate to Canada. American muslims all know that Prince Justin Trudeau and his muslims advisers, sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood, infiltrated in the government will welcome them arms wide open.
JIMJFOX says
Then why did Canadians vote for him?
Idania says
That is the main issue. We need to take all liberals out of office. Vote Conservative, every time in the end it will be better than being submitted to Islam.
Lady Janice says
Older people party because they were voting against Stephen Harper and the younger people treating Trudeau as a celebrity. without finding out what Trudeau was really like.
Although I would have supported the NDP, I voted Harper as he said 10,000 Syrians as against Trudeau with 25,000 then another 25,000. I do not know how many ahve arrived after the first 25,000 who are already hear, but the MSM no longer tell us how many have arrived.
I also fear that if Trump gets in Canada will take the surplus muslims.
Lioness says
That’s all true, Thunderstorm. Canada, like the rest of the world, will become islamic eventually, with Trudeau accelerating this process rapidly.
JIMFOX, you ask WHY Canadian voted for Trudeau? For the same reason people voted for Obama or Merkel. Stupidity and cluelessness abound. Besides, Trudeau promised to legalize marijuana, so that alone got him elected. The stupid, leftist and stoned, all love Trudeau.
Tim says
Dov Berrl, you may be interested in a book I found on Amazon called “Satan’s Trinity: Hitler, Stalin, Muhammad”. Less than 200 pages but packed with some good info and worth a look
Dov Berrol says
*just like Saudi Arabia….
Bob says
Yes, treat the muslims as they treat non-muslims..ie, civilised people …in arab/muslim countries. Tit for tat!!!
Mirren10 says
Brilliant article from Mr. Fitzgerald, as always.
One caveat; can we *please* stop referring to ‘radical islam’ ? It is * islam* pure and simple. By referring to ‘radical islam’ we are foolishly buying into the meme of the ‘moderate muslim’, a manifestly *false* phenomena.
Ala says
hi , i am from middle east , you are the only one who get it , its Islam its Mohammad its Quran ,to be safe we have to say loudly NO mosque NO islamic school NO veil or face vover (hujab) , you come her you obay and respect the law and the way we live
Sam Hawkins says
It’s a translation, author is Alexis Brézet.
Jon Sobieski says
Yeah, that ‘radical’ modifier is a real cop out. Trump uses that too. It’s politically correct, but I hope Trump understands Islam itself is the problem and all Muslims are the problem.
Scott says
+100
Charli Main says
@ M10
Yes, indeed. One of the reason we are currently losing the war against the Muslim invaders of Europe is the bullshit we are constantly fed about the ” peaceful” ” moderate” ” tolerant ” Muslim and that Islam is the religion of peace.
Islam is a virulent disease that continues to thrive BECAUSE MUSLIMS CONTINUE TO BELIEVE IN AND PRACTICE THE INSANE FILTH ADVOCATED IN THE KORAN.
Marty says
100% correct.
Devout mohammedans are the most dangerous people on Earth.
Parents who inculcate islam into the minds of innocent children
should be prosecuted for child cruelty.
Eg” A British teenager who tried to flee to Syria after being radicalised in a family home ‘saturated’ with Islamic State propaganda is set to return to her parents – despite a judge saying she is a ‘significant risk’.”
The parents are the risk.
In the UK most mohammedans live on benefits & have plenty of time to
create Communities of Terror.
The cops know where & who they are (eg Rotherham) but do nothing for assorted reasons, none of which reflect well on the UK.
Bob says
The cops do nothing out of fear of being accused of islamophobia and racism. In other words, political correctness wins and the citizens of the UK’re the losers!
jOE says
I AGREE: DROP THE ‘RADICAL’! IT IS: {ORTHODOX ISLAMIC JIHAD}! IF YOU HAVEN’T VISITED: http://www.politicalislam.com I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT!
Demsci says
Mirren10, I have no objection to your view, but it still seems necessary to distinguish between radical Islam and Islam. And Eduard Odraude brilliantly said, that one of the ways to interpret “radical Islam” is actually, the most radical true and best practiced Islam. As opposed to some kind of fringe of Islam, which is usually meant, which you rightly object to.
I wholeheartedly agree with you that the term “moderate Muslim” is worthless, however.
And to my surprise; I found agreement by a Muslim colleague, who likened the term with “A moderate supporter of Feijenoord (local soccer club).” We both see that this term only describes something that is diminished in a person.
But can’t we substitute that term with a better one? I don’t know. I thought of Combi-Muslims.
Because while some Muslims are indeed devout, following the 5 pillars of Islam, incl. ramadan, the hajj, they still seem to combine their Islam with typical Democratic notions, values, behaviors, choices.
The Muslima’s more so than the Muslim men, in that they clearly choose their partners and often behave in a very autonomous way.
David A says
I think you are essentially correct. In any mass movement the vast majority of the followers are just that, followers. They will float with the crowd. Take Nazi Germany for instance. The majority of the people would not have supported Hitler’s madness, if they had been asked.
So we cannot ask individual Muslims if they are radicalized. No, we must support the few Muslims that want to radically reinterpret Islam, reject the Hadith entirely, interpret the Kill or submit Koran into a description of an internal spiritual battle of submit to divine will, or be spiritually dead, bereft of awareness of the Devine. And we must force Mosques and Imam’s to accept this, publicly and privately, or be closed down with the Imams deported. (Sharia is sedition against the US) This would be perfectly legal. Millions of Muslim women would welcome this reformation. The leaders of Egypt, the Muslims that overthrew Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood, may well welcome this reformation.
The submit or die, the practice of FGM, the designation of second class citizenship to women and non-Muslims, the insistence on a religious state, all must be expunged from rational society. The last Empire religion of antiquity must die as taught and practiced today. Millions of Muslims would support this. Those that will not accept the carrot of true reformation, they get the stick as they are treasonous to the foundational principles of freedom the US was founded on. Millions of Muslim followers would then follow this, many enthusiastically.
eduardo odraude says
Thanks Demsci, I am rarely called that, in fact I’m not sure it’s ever happened before.
To expand the point about the expression “radical Islam”: Some politicians are using it a bit the same way as Lincoln used the word “Union.” To win the Civil War, Lincoln had to keep the North unified, but there were many in the North who did not want to fight if they were fighting to free slaves. They would however fight to save “the Union.” But to Lincoln, the true “Union” — based on the spirit of consensual, constitutional government — required the eventual death of slavery. So when Lincoln used the expression “Union,” it was that Union, the one in which slavery was on the road to its death, that he meant — yet he knew that many of his audience in the North would interpret his talk about fighting to restore the “Union” as meaning nothing more than forcing the South back into unity with the Northern government, regardless of slavery’s continuance or end. Thus Lincoln could say publicly what he thought in a way that his adversaries would misunderstand him and support him, yet he could say it in a way where he was not actually lying.
The same is true with the expression “radical Islam.” It is a convenient phrase for alert politicians, including those on our side, because it can have two meanings. The word “radical” can mean “extreme,” but it can also mean “of the root” — going to the core or essence of something. Thus when someone like Gingrich uses the expression “radical Islam,” he probably is doing this well aware of the double meaning, which allows him, without actually lying, to mask his outlook to the politically correct observer. Gingrich knows that “radical Islam” can mean Islam at the root, essential, true Islam, but he knows that to the confused, to the PC, to Muslims, it looks as if he may be saying “extreme” Islam, not the root of Islam. This kind of political word game is an inevitable part of an effective politics (as often shown by Lincoln’s career), and the only question to ask is whether the politician is using the game in an ethical way for ethical purposes, or an unethical, destructive way for unethical or destructive purposes. Lincoln was a master of using the game for high and noble purposes.
Tim says
correct Mirren10 but I would only use “Islam” instead of radical Islam every once in a while, not all the time, not yet anyway. One step at a time. Don’t forget the bullshit Islamaphobia grenade will be tossed anyone who uses just “Islam”. So use “Islam” in conjunction with “radical Islam” That way the Islamaphobia rant will be muted……………………………..btw, here’s the e-ddress for the Twin Falls prosecutor who is protecting the Mooslim mini-rapists. PamGeller is on the case. Everyone needs to drop the prosetor a line: jkroeger@co.twin-falls.id.us
Mirren10 says
Thanks for the email address, Tim. I shall certainly be dropping Mr/Mrs/Miss Kroeger a line.
Actually, I disagree with your argument. ‘islamophobia’ , racist/bigot, blah blah blah is already thrown at anyone who criticises islam, mohammedans, however mildly. So I think the time has come to tell the truth, and the devil take the consequences.
I counter the ‘radical islam’ crap by quoting Erdogan on islam. 🙂
Jane Curtin says
we watch as the open borders in Europe has now struck the Europeans who so bravely fought Hitler /Nazis.? This isn’t to say America leadind….NO by a long shot. Where is Someone with Ike’s caliber Swarthkoff and even Churchill. Here the president Obama says we build houses for jihadis. Did FDR say we will built houses for japs after they bombed Pearl Harbor? Or did FDR say houses instead of Normandy.We are at war and our president is welcoming ” refugees ” with open arms …meanwhile jihads slip in.
will Rodgers says
The brain dead liberals believe that if they placate the muslims they will avert a war with 1.3 billion people. Why are they so stupid. The 1.3 billion muslims are at war with us and have been for 1400 years.
Islam is more dangerous than Nazism. Communism, or Socialism. It is dangerous because it masks itself as a religion, but it is no more of a religion than Hitlers Nazi fanaticism and fascism. Technically islam is a Theocracy with three legs 1. Barbaric, tribal and brutal 7th Century Sharia Law; 2. Jihad warriors intent on the destruction of all peoples on earth who will not Submit to the words of muhammad [many parts of which he took out of context from other true religions, and threw them in with his bloodthursty orders to kill, maim, rape and enslave anyone who opposes islam, 3. the formation of a Cali fate or political system where everyone is subjugated to the will of muhammad, Sharia Law and the whims of the Imams who hold supreme political and military power. Since we are already at war, all we have to do is to recognize it, and get in the fight politically, ideologically and militrrily.
Dum Spiro says
In this video, TheRebel Media addresses the very point of this Jihad Watch article brilliantly.
I like his “Je suis FED UP” comment as he calls out the CBC. All should agree in his conclusion that a willful ignorance and a willful rejection of the truth in these matters is detrimental and dangerous to Western society…
— Spero
steve brown says
People of France– Your leaders are your enemies. Like Benjamin Netanyahu said, ” The friend of my enemy is my enemy and the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. The leaders of the French government have allowed France to have the highest percentage of shari alas devotees of any European nation. The result is that France is being attacked more than any other European nation by Jihad. People of France, it is your own friends and family and you that support political candidates that foster the immigration of pro sharia law devotees that have led France into the slaughterhouse of sharia law…. France’s own leaders are saying , ”Learn to live with jihad attacks” because more and more are coming….
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Here’s what is required to end the willful blindness and survive in the face of the Moslem onslaught:
1) Civilized populations must recognize the truth. This is unlikely because the truth is so awful (Mohammed was a pedophile, a sex-slaver, Islam intends to take over the world and end freedom, is inherently misogynistic, is anti-science, etc.
2) In the extremely unlikely event that the truth about Islam is broadly recognized, how to act upon it and save ourselves? There are only two possible ways, one is to deprogram Islam from every Moslem in the world, the other is to expel all Moslems back into Dar al-Islam and build massive defenses to keep them at bay.
There is a third alternative. Let the Moslems stay and tolerate the gradual takeover by them and the final end of freedom.
Debi Brand says
Accurately stated, APF.
Moa says
More important than de-programming Muslims is to de-program Westerners We are told to ‘respect’ Islam. Yet when one understands that Islam is FICTION and we have the archeological evidence to prove this then we can deprogram many Westerners and even some Middle Easterners. When the whole world understands the irrefutable archeological evidence against Islam then it will die like any other debunked fiction.
“An Historical Critique of Islam’s Beginnings”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd9lIuUjPs0
Or read Robert Spencer’s excellent book “Did Mohammed Exist?”
Islam is the Scientology of the Dark Ages. A fiction created by evil men to enslaved the bodies and minds of men and (especially) women.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
I think that the de-programming of Westerners must go beyond disseminating accurate information about Islam to its control. If they can’t be forcibly thrown out, then Islam must be declared to be toxic and controlled by law with attendant punishment. Possession of a copy of the Holy Ko-Ran must be made illegal as an anti-American hate speech murder manual that calls for overthrow of the nation, same for the hadiths. Moslems must be registered with the feds and carry an “I’m a Moslem” national ID card. Mosques must be openly monitored with soldiers in attendance every Friday to make sure no calls for violence are made. There’s no way to pussyfoot around with this; it’s time to be open and severe with the problem.
eduardo odraude says
It is important to use historical research to reveal all the holes in the traditional account of Islam, but it’s also true that producing counter-evidence to a faith, rather than undermining that faith, in many cases strengthens it.
Georg says
“France will have to live with terrorism.”
– Manuel Valls, French PM in wake of Nice massacre
Ian H says
So this is his policy is it? Just learn to live with terrorism. I really can’t see him winning reelection on that policy.
Georg says
It’s one of the more despicable and cowardly statements I’ve ever seen from a politician.
“We must accept migrants are more criminal”
-Angela Merkel
“The idea of a clash between Islam and “the West” – a word in which everything is put together and confused – has misled our policies and our narratives. Islam holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe’s history, in our culture, in our food and – what matters most – in Europe’s present and future.”
“The so-called Islamic State is putting forward an unprecedented attempt to pervert Islam for justifying a wicked political and strategic project. … Daʼesh is Islam’s worst enemy in today’s world. Its victims are first and foremost Muslim people. Islam is a victim itself.”
“I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture. Religion plays a role in politics – not always for good, not always for bad. Religion can be part of the process. What makes the difference is whether the process is democratic or not.”
– Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.
-David Cameron
“I didn’t particularly care whether the baseball card said Islamic extremist or violent extremist… it makes no difference to me in terms of who we need to go after…”
-Jeh Johnson, United States Secretary of Homeland Security on terrorism and baseball cards
“I offer condolences to the families and friends of the victims of the attack that hit Nice. My support also goes to those, especially children, who, injured or spared, have been through horror and will be lastingly marked. The 14th of July — the day we celebrate our homeland, its freedom, a holiday — has been turned for the French into a day of terror, of harrowing suffering. We must not see terror attacks come after another and count more deaths without taking action. The war against the scourge of Islamist fundamentalism has not begun; it’s now urgent to declare it. We will truly engage in it by implementing a set of measures I have already detailed and which I’ll have the occasion to come back to, which will aim at tackling the roots of the phenomenon. To our shock and compassion, we must now add action, the necessary measures of prevention and control, and the most absolute determination to eradicate the scourge of Islamist fundamentalism. On this day, I will put all of my energy toward the profound desires of the bruised people of France, so that they are heard and that the battles are waged.”
– Marine Le Pen, leader of Front National (FN)
Moa says
When the Collectivists have enough Muslims backing them they will not need elections to retain power. This is the plan.
Bezelel says
Alexis Brézet said,” Rearmament, by strengthening our conviction that we are in the right, to overcome collectively the perverse logic clothed in the mental rags of “living together,
I’m not a big fan of multi-culturism. The concept short wires assimilation and I suspect that is somewhat by design, or should I say that “multi-culturism is a product of short wiring assimilation from immigration. Never before has it been such a problem with any other group except for muslims. There is no other religion that adheres to the sociopathic doctrine and rituals that islam does. The behavior would not be tolerated if practiced by any other religion. Where O where is that backlash?
Richard says
“Merah, Charlie, Bataclan and now Nice: How many more times until we recognize what is staring us in the face?”
Answer from the regressive left – Unfortunately many, many more times and perhaps never.
They will probably be beheaded and go to their death blaming Israel, the crusades, the bombing of ISIS and their colonial ancestors.
Now they will call for greater truck control and defend Islam the perfect religion. They will warn against the most terrible racist thing you can do – condemn Islam for these atrocities and thus commit the unforgivable sin of Islamophobia.
Richard says
Here is an example of the deluded left.- The Suicidal Jews of Sweden.
Attacks on Jews are escalating in Malmo and other places in Sweden, to the extent they no longer feel safe there and are fleeing Sweden, which gave them refuge from Nazi Germany. But the leftist Jewish council is working with the Swedish government to bring in more “refugees” into the country even as their own community become refugees from these Muslim refugees.
They have not learnt from their history from the time of Muhammad.
When Muhammad fled to Medina as a refugee, the Jewish tribes welcomed him with open arms. Only to have Muhammad expel two Jewish tribes shortly afterwards. The Banu Qaynuqa in AD 624 and the Nadir in AD 625.
During the Battle of the Trench, the Meccans besieged the Muhammad and his Muslim followers and called on the only Jewish tribe left in Medina, the Banu Qurayza to help them. The Banu Qurayza refused and remained neutral, enabling Muhammad to escape annihilation (what a tragedy of history).
For their neutrality however, Muhammad rewarded them by beheading all the male members of their tribe. raping and enslaving their women and enslaving their children.
He divided and conquered the Jews of Medina and other Arabs and Christians and declared “War is deceit” and I have been made victorious through terror”.
Moa says
Russians went to their deaths by the tens of millions crying “Long Live Stalin!”. They believed that if Stalin knew about their execution he would stop it – but the reality was it was the socialist collectivists who were initiating the mass murder, all led with the full blessing of Stalin.
To the Left, their emotional sentiment about what is ‘just’ comes from their ideology and is never referenced with facts. Hence, the Left will keep importing Muslims no matter how many people are sacrificed at the altar of Collectivism.
The question is then open, will the non-Collectivists allow this to happen? will they vote out the lying scumbags that are instigating this invasion in the quest for permanent demographic change and a permanent Left-voting voter base ?
Britain showed how the trend can be reversed peacefully and democratically. Everyone else must also vote to retain sovereignty and to fire all politicians who are enabling this demographic transformation in their quest for power. Vote ’em all out !
eduardo odraude says
It will be up to the independents to some extent — in other words the people whose views are not fixed.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Islam is a corrective belief system with its central predicate the destruction of all other belief systems. After the Jews declined to follow the Holy Prophet Mohammed, he started in on them. The Jews were the first target and he mass murdered and enslaved Jews for not converting to Islam. Now all types of Infidels are threatened, which makes it the ultimate irony that the Jews in the ruined city of Malmo are working to take in more Moslems. The only ray of hope is Modi, the Hindus are the only resistors, although they won’t speak openly about it.
jewdog says
To add insult to injury, one should note that France has voluntarily allowed Muslim immigration to the tune of about 12 percent of her population. It started, at least in part, as a way to get cheap labor, but it’s been said that there is nothing so expensive as cheap labor (the US Civil War is one case in point). What started with pragmatism, though, has devolved into a major challenge to the civil order, to France’s entire social fabric. It’s hard not to be somewhat contemptuous.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
I think it was more about plummeting birth rates than cheap labor. I remember driving along the autoroutes in France about 20 yrs ago and seeing federally funded billboards imploring *French* women to have babies. Birth rates are the biggest factor behind the fast rise of Moslems in the world pecking order. Pill + abortion = Moslem primacy.
eduardo odraude says
To the commenter who calls himself “jewdog,”
Your comment shows that you are trying to avoid contempt, and that effort is a good thing. Because “there but for the grace of God” we will all end up — or if you prefer the secular version, there is Paul Simon, “There but for the grace of you, go I…”
So though it may be hard to avoid contempt sometimes, I remember that what is happening in Europe could happen, indeed is happening, to us too. Maybe the only people entitled to feel some contempt toward the ignorant and the cowardly are those who criticize Islam publicly, with name and face visible.
mortimer says
Alexis Brézet is echoing what John Bolton said, ‘This is war, not law enforcement.’
Lawrence says
Yes but nothing will change short of popular uprisings. This willful blindness is inseparable from general stupidity and escapism in the West, and they are as rampant and pervasive as ever. More so. Facebook piffle, sports as the meaning of life, Reality TV, stupid movies about nothing etc. translates to a brain-dead public. The media continue to lie and cover for the Jihad, so nothing will change.
It’s so bad that people think Trump is the answer even as he is himself too PC, although nobody – that is on the anti-dhimmi front – appears to be pointing this out. He calls for a temporary ban on Muslims entering America, rather than a permanent one and clearly doesn’t know why Muslims are so prone to terrorism and bigotry. After all he says “until we can figure out what’s going on”. A tacit admission he doesn’t know what’s going on. That he doesn’t know why Muslims are the way they are, well many of them. He is thus no Geert Wilders, no Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff etc. And yet all the Trumpers go giddy over somebody who admits he doesn’t know the first thing – that he is totally ignorant – about Islam.
Same in Europe. The institutions are not going to change, they are traitorous and in bed with Islam. Only revolutions will change anything, and I fear revolutions for they will be mindless and bloody. Either way, the West is basically doomed to horrific horrors and self-inflicted tragedies on this front. No end in sight. And what is happening in France, it’s going to happen in Germany, America, Canada, Britain, Australia. Their time will come. And no they are learning nothing, the general public in all these places is largely clueless and INSIST on remaining clueless. Even if it means living with jihadist terror. Generation after generation. That at least is how it is for now.
eduardo odraude says
The trend of elections suggests elections may change things in Europe soon. No need for mob uprisings for a good while yet.
Indeed, lawless action should be avoided as long as democracy is going to hold. Only under a dictatorship does lawless action sometimes become justified. But in a democracy, if one acts against the law (except for civil disobedience), one makes oneself into a little dictator.
Andy says
People keep forgetting the 3 guys (2 American, 1 Brit) who stopped the Train massacre last August. Absent their quick thinking and action, there would have been 100-200 more victims of these thugs.
Baucent says
“Never before in history has an enemy benefited so much from the willingness of those he fights to accommodate him.”
A very good editorial from a major French newspaper.
Mockingjay says
Yes, I was thinking the same.
And what a very powerful sentence.
Leonidas says
TO DEFEAT ISLAM:
1-Ban muslim immigration and deport muslims that accept Sharia Law.
2-Demand equal rights to women in all muslim lands
3-Punish by death those that kill apostates from Islam,blasphemers , adulterers or Hypocrites
4- Declare the Medina part of the Koran a hate book and ban it world wide from the Mosques ,as it forbids muslims to be friends with Jews Christians and Infidels who might lead them astray of the right path and commands the muslims to kill them if they refuse to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax and declares the women are inferior to men, wives must be beaten for disobedience , they all will go to hell unless their husbands say they were pleased with them and must wear Burkas ,as not to excite men
5- Denounce the pseudoprophet Muhammad as a criminal ,since according to witnesses in Sira and Hadith he was a pedophile,rapist,murderer, torturer,bandit and slave trader and shame the muslims who revere such acriminal
6-Buy no muslim oil or products to defund global jihad
Islam is a political ideology(> 80% -islamofascism)disguised as a religion( < 20% ) and must be defeated the way totalitarian Communism in USSR was defeated.Islam promotes Jihad ,as in Hadith it says Jihadists ,when killed ,go to sex paradise , where they enjoy 70 virgins, and 70 of their relatives will also go to paradise and thats why the relatives are grateful for their sacrifice and rejoice for their death!
Moa says
Also educate every single person in the West that Islam is FICTION and does not match the archeological evidence. This is important as it immunizes nearly all of the population from falling for Islam’s lies.
“An Historical Critique of Islam’s Beginnings”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd9lIuUjPs0
Every Westerner should know the irrefutable archeological evidence that shows Islam is FALSE and FICTION.
Redmond says
You claim to be more educated than these world leaders? They have a throng of advisers from military intelligence telling them what to say and do. Here’s the unanimous findings across all Western countries:
1. The rapid birthrates of Muslim communities against the negative birthrates of non-Muslims will inevitably result into Muslim majority in 2 decades.
2. Trying to postpone this inevitable outcome will actually cause a significant increase in non-Muslim casualties due to protracted persecution and terrorism.
3. The only way to minimize such casualties is to hasten the Muslim majority outcome through massive immigration.
Governments have vast resources to predict socio-political and economic conditions of the country. They are even using powerful computers to crunch demographic , financial, and climatic data in order to yield accurate predictions not only for the next several years but decades. No matter how painful their decisions are, they’re actually the most favorable direction.
You have no choice my friend, either migrate to South America and Indochina or grin and bear it.
Jay Boo says
However, the rapid birthrates of Muslim communities is partially offset by Muslims killing each other for Allah’s sake.
Muslims also routinely butcher their own daughters for their Pig Bath Puppet dictator Allah.
Muslims are truly PERVERSE.
eduardo odraude says
Would add two items to your list:
1) the non-Muslim world should start sending agents to the Islamic world to kidnap or kill some some significant number of those public figures or notable imams who publicly call for the death of apostates from Islam, or who call for the death of “blaspheming” artists, journalists, professors, comedians, etc.
2) the policy on Muslim immigration should be: discontinue until a majority of Muslim-majority nations permits real freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
Redmond says
It’s called “stooping down to their level”. No leader of the Western world will ever agree to that. You cannot defeat terrorism by being a terrorist yourself.
Debi Brand says
Excellent. On point to the word.
Matthieu Baudin says
“…These soldiers of the caliphate don’t wage war by halves. They come right up to us to “slit the throats of our sons and our women” [from La Marseillaise: “egorger nos fils et nos compagnes”], and in return we offer them the protection of our laws — to the very people who want to destroy us! Never before in history has an enemy benefited so much from the willingness of those he fights to accommodate him…”
As I said yesterday, anyone who takes up arms in the name of Islam is a ‘Soldier Of Islam’ and ought to be dealt with outside of civilian law and institutions; it should be military courts and military prisons and military firing squads for those who plan and carry out civilian slaughter. Anyone aiding or abetting these war crimes should also be dealt with by the same military courts, investigated and processed through the same military channels as those delivering the blows. This is what a galvanised nation at war will look like when the citizenry revolts against this self effacing phoney war.
dumbledoresarmy says
And the military bases, the fortresses, the arsenals and magazines and bombs/ weapons factories, the recruitment-and-incitement centres, the ‘safe houses’ – that is, to cut a long story short, the MOSQUES – need to be taken out, fast and hard.
The rule should be: something like the Bataclan or Brussels or Nice attacks takes place (or is attempted, but thwarted, or else is plotted, but detected and nipped in the bud in time); then … BOOM, all mosques in the affected city or town or region are instantly surprise-searched by the *army* and turned upside down and given a jolly good shake to see what falls out. *Any* evidence of *anything* the least bit, er, ‘dodgy’ going on or having gone on? – the mosque, or mosques, gets demolished, right down to the ground.
Because that’s what you do with enemy bases. You find them, search them, and *destroy* them.
David M says
France is 10% Muslim, thanks to traitor politicians. Once you get to 10% Muslim population you are stuffed, I sure won’t be visiting France any time soon.
These are just lone wolf attacks at the moment, wait till we get 10 or 20 jihadists in a co-ordinated city wide attack at the same time. There will be utter chaos, all thanks to traitors like Merkel & all the other politicians letting Muslims into Europe.
Jay Boo says
What is wrong with these Islamophobia causing TRUCKS?
We must not fail to examine this thoroughly. Could it be a failure in the braking system?
Every year someone is killed by an out of control truck. If the driver happens to be a Muslim, then lookout for Islamophobia.
— sarc
duh swani says
‘Monsters from the Id…Not yours, not mine…They are the army of the demo
sometimes known as Allah…He is also Sin,Baal, Satan and Moloch all rolled into one evil entity…but they only have one book, the Quran, and all the monsters obey the commands in it…I don’t believe in demons, but there are forces that act like demons are supposed to act…and there is that evil book…
eduardo odraude says
Hugh Fitzgerald, thank you very much for translating and giving a window into France. Would like to see more such translations when you find worthwhile things.
Savvy Kafir says
World War III is raging, but most “leaders” and “journalists” on our side doggedly refuse to admit that obvious fact.
eduardo odraude says
Is there a single policy that could simultaneously create pressure in Muslim-majority nations to stop the heavy discrimination against non-Muslims in those nations, and also stop the influx of Muslims into non-Muslim nations?
Yes. If non-Muslim nations began to announce that Muslim immigration would be halted until a majority of Muslim-majority nations permitted real freedom of speech and freedom of religion, such a policy would kill the two named birds with one stone.
Kaz says
There is a way to actually defeat Islam. Most Muslims are not even aware of the truth about Muhammad. The Muslims who still have their conscience intact, only reject the more violent texts within the Koran because they don’t agree with them. It is a sin that warrants the death penalty for questioning the commands of Muhammad, or revealing the truth about Islam to the unbeliever. This is a Catch22 for Muslims. Even if they don’t agree with Islam, they are now Muslims and if they say anything truthful about Islam, they face the death sentence of apostasy. If they don’t practice Islam “properly” they face being labelled as an opposite.
The truth is they don’t really know the truth about Muhammad. Even if they do, they cannot say anything because they are surrounded by those who would kill them without question.
As long as we perceive the answer is to declare all Muslims are evil, we also throw in the vast majority of “non true” Muslims who are ignorant of their own religion, or are afraid of their lives, and family if they even suggest that they are trapped within a death cult which is Islam. True Islam.
So, the true extremists within Islam, are those who we consider are moderates. How do we tell the difference between the moderate and the jihadist? You can’t. Through lies and false humility, they disappear within the midst of those who don’t agree.
Who do we trust? How about the trying to believe those who successfully escaped Islam and truly reveal Islam for what it is?
Ali Sina, from faithfreedom “an opostate” painstakingly wrote a book that is free on his site that has delivered tens of thousands of Muslims out of Islam by revealing the truth about Muhammad.
If everyone in Parliament and all civilians read this book, the answer to defeat Islam would present itself. You will understand the mind of Muslims and the evil the Koran contains, and defeat Islam by revealing truth to the world. Reveal the truth, and and the mystery of Islam is defeated. Kill Islam with the pen. Or videos.
Its up to everyone who loves freedom and wishes to remain free to read this extremely important book!
Nothing else will truly work.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/?s=Understanding+&submit=Search
will Rodgers says
Truth eventually wins. Shine light on the darkness of Evil and it scatters. Jehova God is in control of all things