• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Muslim who beheaded priest to France: “We are going to destroy your country”

Jul 29, 2016 9:40 am By Robert Spencer

“Brothers go out with a knife, whatever is needed, attack them, kill them en masse.” This is already happening. And it’s going to get much, much worse.

In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler told the world what he was going to do. No one took him seriously. The same thing is happening today.

Abdelmalik Petitjean2

“ISIS church-attacker worked at a French airport as a baggage handler three months before priest murder and got through police checks ‘easily’ to secure the job,” by Peter Allen, MailOnline, July 29, 2016:

…Abdelmalik Petitjean and Adel Kermiche, both 19, were both on terrorist watchlists when they slit Father Jacques Hamel’s throat in Normandy on Tuesday….

It comes as ISIS released a new video of the teenager calling on fellow extremists to ‘destroy’ France and launch attacks on its allies.

Dressed in a striped t-shirt, Petitjean speaks mostly in French but uses some Arabic phrases, and appears to be filming in a home.

Addressing President Francois Hollande and Prime Minister Manuel Valls directly, he says: ‘You will suffer what our brothers and sisters are suffering. We are going to destroy your country.’

‘Brothers go out with a knife, whatever is needed, attack them, kill them en masse.’…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, France, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh) Tagged With: Abdelmalik Petitjean


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. duh swami says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 10:09 am

    ‘Brothers go out with a knife, whatever is needed, attack them, kill them en masse.’…

    What Mahoundians lack is the knowledge and understanding of what it takes to be a man…

  2. John Marst says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 10:10 am

    He was correct. They will destroy France and any other country that fails to eradicate the menace. The Delusion of Inclusion is strong, so the outlook is poor.

  3. Michael Copeland says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 10:21 am

    Abdelmalik Petitjean has not misunderstood, warped, twisted, or perverted anything.
    He was doing “exactly what this book says”.

  4. overman says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 10:24 am

    “In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler told the world what he was going to do. No one took him seriously.”

    Wrong. Winston Churchill took him seriously. And l think Trump takes them seriously. But, throughout europe and UK, he’s right [not sure about May yet] – most european Leaders have a ‘Chamberlain Mentality’, and that’s why they need replacing immediately.

    • Jane Curtin says

      Jul 29, 2016 at 4:28 pm

      Exactly. Who says history doesn’t repeat it self .We had in last century Stalin, Hitler, Mao Khymer rouge. And today we have ISIS. And the world leaders are like ostrichs. The way Europe was prior to WW I…you know the war to end all all wars!

    • Mike says

      Jul 29, 2016 at 4:30 pm

      This is why for all his faults, I would vote for Trump, if I were American.

      Whatever other damage he might do can be fixed later. This can’t be fixed so easily.

      So Trump is the best candidate, on account of these problems. So is Marine Le Pen.

    • Unknown says

      Jul 29, 2016 at 7:14 pm

      overman,
      Do you think is Trump wins they will be a chance for West so we can fight and actually beat them? Do you think that a victory of Trump would mean the same as happened with Churchill and Hitler? I mean, a chance to fight for our civilization and our survive. We are basically are getting one attack per day on Western societies, we must admit we are at war.

  5. G P says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 10:48 am

    When someone is that upfront with you, believe them.

  6. Angemon says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 11:06 am

    In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler told the world what he was going to do. No one took him seriously. The same thing is happening today.

    Right, the “I know better than them” brigade. How I despise them.

  7. Jay Boo says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 11:29 am

    If we were to behead every bearded Muslim, I estimate up to 90 % of terror attacks would be prevented.

    Hillary Clinton would never allow this to happen however, because beheading of any Muslim by an infidel is not allowed in SHARIA law.

  8. Walter Sieruk says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 1:27 pm

    An ISIS audio recording had declared in September 2014 which was before those brutal and murderous jihad attacks in Paris ,Nice and the latest murder of the priest in France , That recording stated “If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French…kill him in any manner or way however it may be.” [1] The ruthless and deadly intentions of the jihadist of ISIS were known from this as well as other sources well before those ISIS jihad attack in Paris in November 13 2015 and Nice July 14 2016 . Furthermore, the jihadists of ISIS have terrible gall in that audio recording. Furthermore, the jihadists who make up ISIS have some gall calling the French “spiteful” since this the ISIS thugs who have ,time and time again, in many cruel, callous viciously brutal way murdered many people have in different countries. Likewise , the jihadist who compose ISIS also have much gall calling the French “filthy” since it’s the ISIS savages who are so very vile and heinous to kidnap and then raped both girls and women.

    [1] THE ISIS CRISIS by Charles Dyer page 44

  9. David says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    French political correctness will destroy their freedom . Islam has said on numerous occasions that they will destroy your country using your own rules, laws etc.
    Believe them !

  10. Peter Ahlskog says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 4:34 pm

    I wonder what he says about ISIS soldiers holding thousands of Muslim women as sex slaves. Are these women not his sisters?

    In what way did France start the Syrian civil war? Bush in USA and Blair in UK took away Saddam, and the hope in MENA countries that people actually can get rid of their dictators, life-time presidents and tyrants started the Arab spring. The Arab spring started civil wars or similar situations in many MENA countries. France didn’t start it. Germany didn’t start it. Sweden didn’t start it. Austria didn’t start it. The MENA muslims are a tribe people with a long, pre-muhammedan history of blaming made up enemies somewhere outside clan, tribe or the big tribe of Islam and fabrication of lies and conspiracy theories.
    about the West.

    For the security of people of all other faiths on this planet and world peace, these islaughters must be kept behind big walls and electric fences inside their own area in Middle East, Africa, the Turkistan countries, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The rest of the world should leave this area and let the Muslim islaughters alone to take care of themselves. Strip them of all weapons and Western technology and give them tools for farming and leave them alone for at least 1000 years.

    This is the way to global world peace, harmony, freedom, respect, gender equality, teaching of all children and advancement for the 5 billion humans who are not Muslims and tribal robbers of more advanced civilizations. This is the only way for the Muslims inside the walls to prove that they have a religion of peace. If they still are there, after 1000 years behind walls without any contact at all with Europe, America, Australia and East Asia, then maybe we can believe them. Maybe

  11. Norwegian says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 7:13 pm

    I have a growing feeling the muslims have a storm comming their way they could not even dream abaout….

    So…we wil see about that little pigf***er…

  12. Christopher471 says

    Jul 29, 2016 at 9:18 pm

    It must not be forgotten that the geo-political makeup of the Middle East is basically a British invention. T.E. Lawrence, who was there in 1916 organized the Arabs as a fighting force to fight the Ottoman empire who were allied with the Germans. Later the Americans began to force out the British in order to maintain control over the Middle Eastern oil. Unfortunately they’ve had to live with the unpleasant regime in Saudi Arabia and lost their influence in Tehran with the fall of the Shah of Iran.
    To organize a political force to control the Middle East, economically or politically, will be difficult since many of the world’s industrial leaders, banks and oil companies will defend Middle Eastern countries from any western incursion. After all they control the money which pays for western armies and, more importantly, western politicians. Were it not for the oil companies the electric car would be common on the world’s highways.
    Western countries, particularly the USA and the British, have made many mistakes in the last 50 years, in dealing with the Middle East. One example was the invasion of the Suez area in 1956 by the French and the British (with the collusion of Israel). President Eisenhower, and others, called for the invasion to be halted and for the Allied forces to be recalled. Presumably he wanted to gain influence with Nasser and other leaders in the Middle East by being their ‘defender’- as well as maintaining US influence. Had the British and French stayed as ‘peace keepers’ they could have influenced the development of the area along more western lines and probably halted the subsequent Israeli-Arab wars? A strong western military presence might have altered Middle Eastern history entirely. Who knows? ‘What if?’… is always a wonderful game.

  13. sham says

    Jul 30, 2016 at 1:00 am

    The Right to Life

    The first and the foremost basic right is the right to live and respect human life. The Holy Quran lays down:

    Whosoever kills a human being without (any reason like) man slaughter, or corruption on earth, it is as though he had killed all mankind … (5:32)

    As far as the question of taking life in retaliation for murder or the question of punishment for spreading corruption on this earth is concerned, it can be decided only by a proper and competent court of law. If there is any war with any nation or country, it can be decided only by a properly established government. In any case, no human being has any right by himself to take human life in retaliation or for causing mischief on this earth. Therefore it is incumbent on every human being that under no circumstances should he be guilty of taking a human life. If anyone has murdered a human being, it is as if he has slain the entire human race. These instructions have been repeated in the Holy Quran in another place saying:

    Do not kill a soul which Allah has made sacred except through the due process of law �Quran (6:151)

    Here also homicide has been distinguished from destruction of life carried out in pursuit of justice. Only a proper and competent court will be able to decide whether or not an individual has forfeited his right to life by disregarding the right to life and peace of other

    human beings. The Prophet, may God’s blessings be on him, has declared homicide as the greatest sin only next to polytheism.

    The Tradition of the Prophet reads: “The greatest sins are to associate

    something with God and to kill human beings.”

    In all these verses of the Quran and the Traditions of the Prophet the word ‘soul’ (nafs) has been used in general terms without any distinction or particularization which might have lent itself to the elucidation that the persons belonging to one’s nation, the citizens of one’s country, the people of a particular race or religion should not be killed. The injunction applies to all human beings and the destruction of human life in itself has been prohibited.

    ‘The Right to Life’ has been given to man only by Islam. You will observe that the people who talk about human rights if they have ever mentioned them in their Constitutions or Declarations, then it is clearly implied in them that these rights are applicable only to their citizens or they have been framed for the white race alone. This can clearly be gleaned by the fact that human beings were hunted down like animals in Australia and the land was cleared of the aborigines for the white man. Similarly the aboriginal population of America was systematically destroyed and the Red Indians who somehow survived this genocide were confined to specified areas called Reservations. They also penetrated into Africa and hunted down human beings like wild animals. All these instances go to prove that they have no respect for human life as such and if they have, it is only on the basis of their nationality, color or race. Contrary to this, Islam recognizes this right for all human beings. If a man belongs to a primitive or savage tribe, even then Islam regards him as a human being.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 30, 2016 at 2:36 am

      The meretricious sham wrote:

      The Right to Life

      The first and the foremost basic right is the right to live and respect human life.
      ………………………………..

      If sham *really* believed this why wouldn’t he take it up with his foul coreligionists, rather than lying to the good Infidels here at Jihad Watch?

      More:

      The Holy Quran lays down:

      Whosoever kills a human being without (any reason like) man slaughter, or corruption on earth, it is as though he had killed all mankind … (5:32)
      ………………………………..

      Anyone who reads the Qur’an knows that this passage is chiding Jews for (supposedly) not living up to their own values–it is not about Muslims being told not to murder people.

      More:

      As far as the question of taking life in retaliation for murder or the question of punishment for spreading corruption on this earth is concerned…
      ………………………………..

      “Spreading corruption in the earth” is a reference to *anything* that presents an obstacle to the spread of Islam–and that includes the existence of Christian priests and nuns.

      More:

      …it can be decided only by a proper and competent court of law.
      ………………………………..

      This is only true where Muslims have imposed Shari’ah law. Since France is an Infidel nation not under Shari’ah, it is up to individual Muslims to enforce Islamic law–that is *exactly* what these pious Jihadists did when they beheaded this poor priest.

      More:

      If there is any war with any nation or country, it can be decided only by a properly established government.
      ………………………………..

      Many Muslims believe that that is the Islamic State–and these Jihadists openly claimed they acted in ISIS’s name.

      More:

      In any case, no human being has any right by himself to take human life in retaliation or for causing mischief on this earth. Therefore it is incumbent on every human being that under no circumstances should he be guilty of taking a human life. If anyone has murdered a human being, it is as if he has slain the entire human race.
      ………………………………..

      Why is sham quoting Qur’an 5:32 again? This only applies to civilized Jews–Muslims may slaughter Infidels in Dar-al-Harb with impunity.

      More:

      These instructions have been repeated in the Holy Quran in another place saying:

      Do not kill a soul which Allah has made sacred except through the due process of law �Quran (6:151)
      ………………………………..

      Not quite. It says “do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden”–it also says not to “associate anything with Allah”. Since Muslims believe that Christians “associate partners with Allah”, this Ayat, far from forbidding Muslims to murder Christian clerics, confirms that it is Halal.

      More:

      human beings. The Prophet, may God’s blessings be on him, has declared homicide as the greatest sin only next to polytheism.
      ………………………………..

      Well, *that* is telling. Since they are held to “associate partners with Allah”, Christians are regarded as polytheists, and so allowing them to live is worse than homicide..

      More:

      The Tradition of the Prophet reads: “The greatest sins are to associate

      something with God and to kill human beings.”
      ………………………………..

      More of the same.

      More:

      ‘The Right to Life’ has been given to man only by Islam.
      ………………………………..

      Just grimly laughable. Islam is the bloodiest creed in existence. If Infidels had a right to life under Islam, why are so many Muslims slaughtering them all over the world?

      More:

      You will observe that the people who talk about human rights if they have ever mentioned them in their Constitutions or Declarations, then it is clearly implied in them that these rights are applicable only to their citizens or they have been framed for the white race alone.
      ………………………………..

      What claptrap. The Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights do not mention race at all. They apply to all mankind.

      Slavery in Africa was most widely perpetrated *by Islam*.

      In fact, slavery was abolished in the free West–but it not only continues to exist in Islam, it is undergoing a hideous *revival* along with Islam right now. One in five people in Muslim Mauritania is a slave, and the Islamic State is openly holding slave markets for sex slaves.

      Pretty much everything sham has said in his Taqiyya is a lie.

      • Angemon says

        Jul 30, 2016 at 7:06 pm

        +1

    • Angemon says

      Jul 30, 2016 at 7:06 pm

      The sham posted:

      “The Right to Life

      The first and the foremost basic right is the right to live and respect human life. The Holy Quran lays down:

      Whosoever kills a human being without (any reason like) man slaughter, or corruption on earth, it is as though he had killed all mankind … (5:32)”

      We know your little book, you moron. 5:32:

      Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.

      Whom was that referring to? The “Children of Israel” – i.e., the Jews. What’s applicable to muslims comes after, in 5:33:

      Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment

  14. sham says

    Jul 30, 2016 at 1:03 am

    The Right to the Safety of Life

    Immediately after the verse of the Holy Quran which has been mentioned in connection with the right to life,
    God has said in the Holy Quran: “And whoever saves a life it is as though he had saved the lives of all mankind” (5:32).

    There can be several forms of saving man from death. A man may be ill or wounded, irrespective of his nationality, race or colour. If you know that he is in need of your help, then it is your duty that you should arrange for his treatment for disease or wound. If he is dying of starvation, then it is your duty to feed him so that he can ward off death. If he is drowning or his life is at stake, then it is your duty to save him. You will be surprised to hear that the Talmud, the religious book of the Jews, contains a verse of similar nature, but records it in altogether different form. It says: “Whoever destroyed a life of the Israelite, in the eyes of the Scripture, it is as if he destroyed the whole world. And whoever protected and saved one life of the Israelite, in the light of the Scripture, it is as if he saved the whole world.” Talmud also contains the view that if a non-Israelite is

    drowning and you tried to save him then you are a sinner. Can it be given a name other than racialism? We regard it as our duty to save every human life, because it is thus that we have been enjoined in the Holy Quran. On the other hand, if they regard it necessary to save the life of a human being at all, it should be the life of an Israelite. As far as other people are concerned, according to this view, they do not seem to be human enough to deserve protection of their persons. In their literature the concept of ‘Goyim’ for which the English word ‘Gentile’ and the Arabic word ummi (illiterate) is used, is that they enjoy no human rights; human rights are reserved only for the children of Israel. The Quran has mentioned this belief of the Israelites and quotes the Jews saying: “There is no blame on us (for anything we may do) with regard to the unlettered folk (i.e. the ummi)” (3:75).
    Equality of Human Beings

    Islam not only recognizes absolute equality between men irrespective of any distinction of colour, race or nationality, but makes it an important and significant principle, a reality.

    The Almighty God has laid down in the Holy Quran: O mankind! We created you from a single soul, male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, so that you may come to know one another. Truly, the most honored of you in Allah�s sight is the greatest of you in piety. Allah is All-Knowing,All-Aware. (49:13)

    This means that the division of human beings into nations, races, groups and tribes is for the sake of distinction, so that people of one race or tribe may meet and be acquainted with the people belonging to another race or tribe and cooperate with one another. This division of the human race is neither meant for one nation to take pride in its superiority over others nor is it meant for one nation to treat another with contempt or disgrace, or

    regard them as a mean and degraded race and usurp their rights.
    “Indeed, the noblest among you before God are the most heedful of you” (49:13).

    In other words the superiority of one man over another is only on the basis of God-consciousness, purity of character and high morals, and not on the basis of colour, race, language or nationality, and even this superiority based on piety and pure conduct does not justify that such people should play lord or assume airs of superiority over other human beings. Assuming airs of superiority is in itself a reprehensible vice which no God-fearing and pious man can ever dream of perpetrating. Nor does the righteous have more privileged rights over others, because this runs counter to human equality, which has been laid down in the beginning of this verse as a general principle. From the moral point of view, goodness and virtue is in all cases better than vice and evil.

    This has been exemplified by the Prophet(pbuh) in one of his sayings thus:

    “No Arab has any superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab. Nor does a white man have any superiority over a black man, or the black man any superiority over the white man. You are all the children of Adam, and Adam was created from clay” (al-Bayhaqi and al-Bazzaz).

    In this manner Islam established equality for the entire human race and struck at the very root of all distinctions based on colour, race, language or nationality. According to Islam,God has given man this right of equality as a birthright. Therefore no man should be discriminated against on the ground of the colour of his skin, his place of birth, the race or the nation in which he was born. Malcolm X, the famous leader of African Negroes in America, who had launched a bitter struggle against the white people of America in order to win civil rights for his black compatriots, when he went to perform

    the pilgrimage, and saw how the Muslims of Asia, Africa, Europe, America and those of different races, languages and colours of skin, were wearing one dress and were hurrying towards God’s House-the Ka’bah and offering prayers standing in one row and there was no distinction of any kind between them, then he realized that this was the solution to the problem of colour and race, and not what he had been trying to seek or achieve in America so far. Today, a number of non- Muslim thinkers, who are free from blind prejudice, openly admit that no other religion or way of life has solved this problem with the same degree of success with which Islam has done so.

    The Right to Co-operate and Not to Co-operate

    Islam has prescribed a general principle of paramount importance and universal application saying:
    “Co-operate with one another for virtue and heedfulness and do not co-operate with one another for the purpose of vice and aggression” (5:2).

    This means that the man who undertakes a noble and righteous work, irrespective of the fact whether he is living at the North Pole or the South Pole, has the right to expect support and active co-operation from the Muslims. On the contrary he who perpetrates deeds of vice and aggression, even if he is our closest relation or neighbour, does not have the right to win our support and help in the name of race, country, language or nationality, nor should he have the expectation that Muslims will co-operate with him or

    support him. Nor is it permissible for Muslims to co-operate with him. The wicked and vicious person may be our own brother, but he is not of us, and he can have no help or support from us as long as he does not repent and reform his ways. On the other hand the man who is doing deeds of virtue and righteousness may have no kinship with Muslims,but Muslims will be his companions and supporters or at least his well-wishers.

    We have discussed the human rights in general. Now we would like to take up the question of rights of the citizens in an Islamic State. As these rights are more extensive than the general human rights which have been described earlier, they need separate treatment.

    • LR says

      Jul 30, 2016 at 4:05 pm

      …”We have discussed the human rights in general. Now we would like to take up the question of rights of the citizens in an Islamic State. As these rights are more extensive than the general human rights which have been described earlier, they need separate treatment.”

      The western world already sees what happens in ‘Islamic states’. No ‘free speech’ rights, freedom of association, etc. Brutal beheadings, rape, stonings , honor killings, etc.

      Go preach to ISIL. Go preach to the Saudis, Pakistan, Al-Queda etc., and see how far you get.

      • JaneCurtin says

        Jul 30, 2016 at 9:42 pm

        I think Angela Merkel
        suffers from ” peace in our time” She thinks if she can provide shelter food etc. migrants/reflugees won’t bother to harm germans. Well she is drastically wrong. And dug herself and the rest of Europeans in quite a big ditch . And she is dragging America in also to her huge folly.

    • Angemon says

      Jul 30, 2016 at 7:07 pm

      The sham posted:

      “Immediately after the verse of the Holy Quran which has been mentioned in connection with the right to life,”

      You mean, the one straight out of the Torah that was meant as a reminder to Jews? The one you (well, whoever wrote the garbage you’re copy/pasting) edited to leave out that was not the marching orders given to muslims? 5:32? Yes, after 5:32 muslims got their marching orders – kill those who oppose muhammad or islam.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.