Over at Epic Times, I discuss the worst Prime Minister Great Britain could possibly have: its next one.
OPINION – The worst outcome of Britain’s unexpected vote to leave the European Union was the resignation of David Cameron as Prime Minister – not because he was a great leader (he wasn’t), but because his successor is Theresa May, who promises to surpass even her feckless predecessor and become the weakest, most appeasement-minded Prime Minister since Neville Chamberlain.
As I was banned by Theresa May from entering Britain for the crime of correctly noting that Islam has doctrines involving violence against unbelievers, I know firsthand her anxiousness to please forces that do not regard free speech and open debate as positives for society. But there is more. As head of the UK Home Office, May announced a review of Britain’s Sharia courts – then appointed Muslims to oversee it, drawing protests from human rights activists concerned that her review board would be too biased to note the courts’ violations of women’s rights.
Theresa May Has A History Of Oppression
May also disregarded warnings about security risks and scrapped an aerial surveillance program that had been designed to stop migrants from sneaking into Britain. With May heading the Home Office, the British government helped illegal immigrants quash convictions for fraud and other crimes, so that they could stay in the country.
May has claimed counterfactually that the Islamic State’s “actions have absolutely no basis in anything written in the Quran.” She asserted, in the teeth of abundant evidence (including a statement from ISIS saying that jihad attacks would continue in France “as long as they boast about their war against Islam”), that the November 2015 jihad massacre in Paris had “nothing to do with Islam.” This willful ignorance hamstrings intelligence and law enforcement officials’ ability to fight the jihadis: one cannot defeat an enemy while refusing to name or understand it.
But May is on the case. With the jihad threat higher than ever, May vowed to fight all forms of extremism, from “Islamist” to “neo-Nazi.” Does Britain have a big neo-Nazi problem? Did neo-Nazis set off bombs on a London bus and behead a British soldier in the street? Are goosesteppers strutting around in Trafalgar Square? No. By “neo-Nazis,” May means those people who dare to speak out against the immigration and national security policies she has pursued that have brought Britain to the brink of catastrophe.
As Prime Minister, she may get the chance to push Britain off the edge.
Richard says
They will lose many votes in the next general election, as some would say …
ed says
4 million ukip voters at the last election , 18 million cross party brexit voters ,do the maths , the elite are now hog-tied [ed uk ]
Mirren10 says
”4 million ukip voters at the last election , 18 million cross party brexit voters … ”
Yes. The next General Election is supposed to be in 2020, but if there’s a vote of no confidence against May, it could be sooner. Let’s hope for sooner.
warren raymond says
UKIP is going nowhere without Farage.
Mirren10 says
I like Farage, but no-one is irreplaceable. Why assume UKIP is nowhere without him ?
Jay Boo says
Relax
She has all the Islamo-Rats under control.
She has contracted with pied pipers and will pay for their services with empty promises what could possibly go wrong?
DFD says
Jay Boo, Charli, Angemon, and and and…
===============================.
Less than a minute, but you have to see this!
———————————————————–.
I was browsing, went from here to there, politics, cars, you name it, movies, history, then I cam across a listing titled “National Action”, a UK website, you can also call it NASDAP for short. Right, there are many like these, probably more than us anti-jihadis… So a brief snooping, and I hit **IT** ! I couldn’t believe my eyes, but they are serious, at least, it appears that way.
What am I talking about – between laugh cramps?
The winning Ms. Adolf Hitler contest! What else?!
—————————————————————-.
And here she is: https://youtu.be/27PrUdU4dbE
Hot tip, get a girdle to keep your abs under control…. Although, laughter is supposed to be good.
LR says
DFD..
Just what we need…something a bit goofy once in awhile.
DFD says
LR
Well, if you like a laugh may want to try this, the new & improved La Marseillaise
with English subtitles…
https://youtu.be/M4Ho9zSAK-s
Begins after about 1:48 mins.
Angemon says
I, for one, am disappointed at the lack of moustache. I guess they don’t make Hitlers as they used to…
Unless, of course, the tiny rectangular strip of hair is located further down…
>_>
<_<
-_-
Charli Main says
Theresa May, like her ex boss, is rabidly pro European Union. Now that the door to the Brussels retirement home, for pensioned off British MPs, has been shut in her face, it will be interesting to see how she wears the brexit coat. Then again, she always has been a two faced, arse kisser, so being a turn coat should come easily to her.
overman says
Exactly – a two-faced coward.
Bonnie Prince Charlie says
Believe me, Robert. Theresa May inadvertently did you and Pamela a big favour by stopping you coming to Britain to speak at a meeting of Neo-Nazis. You obviously didn’t check out who these people were before you accepted their invitation. You would have lost respect and credibility amongst your supporters if you’d spoken. Next time you get an invitation, I’d be only too pleased to check the inviters out on your behalf before you accept or reject.
gravenimage says
Yes, banning the peaceful Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from Britain was just a big win/win for freedom all around…sarc/off.
Robert Spencer says
You’re lying. We were not going to address any gathering of neo-Nazis.
gravenimage says
Of course he is lying. He is just attempting to undermine the Anti-Jihad movement. Scum.
Mirren10 says
”Believe me, Robert. Theresa May inadvertently did you and Pamela a big favour by stopping you coming to Britain to speak at a meeting of Neo-Nazis.”
What rubbish. The EDL are *not* neo-Nazis.
They are quite simply a grassroots movement of **working-class* British people, who want their country back.
How dare the chavs have any opinions, eh ?
Michael Copeland says
Theresa May mis-stated the law when excluding Robert Spencer.
English law penalises speech “which fosters hatred”.
She excluded Spencer for speech “which MAY foster hatred”.
She invented a whole new everlastingly extendable category, which is not in the Statute.
Mirren10 says
”She excluded Spencer for speech “which MAY foster hatred”.
She excluded Mr. Spencer because she’s a rat coward and was terrified the mohammedans would ‘damage community cohesion’. (aka riot). Vomit.
”She invented a whole new everlastingly extendable category, which is not in the Statute.”
Indeed. Except, of course, mohammedan jihadist hate preachers, who can come and go with impunity. How I *loathe* this two-faced cow, and **all** the bloody Tories, Labour, lib/demos.
Vote UKIP, and LibertyGB.
EYESOPEN says
Bravo Mirren10! Spot-on. I thought I was going to puke when I heard that the jihadis’ best friend, Theresa May was to become the U.K.’s new prime minister. Even before that, I was incensed when people were comparing this bimbo to Margaret Thatcher!
gravenimage says
She is, perhaps, the anti-Margaret Thatcher.
overman says
“As Prime Minister, she may get the chance to push Britain off the edge.”
Yes, she’s too soft on lslam. Together with Mayor Khan, London is fast on the way to becoming Londonistan in a few years.
Evangeline Golding says
It’s already Londonistan. And under these two clowns, it won’t get any better.
gravenimage says
She isn’t just soft on Islam–she is doing everything she can to shut down those opposing the Jihad threat. Look at her illegal and undemocratic ban of the peaceful Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
Kepha says
What say any British readers here?
DFD says
Kepha says: “What say any British readers here?”
OK, I am Anglo-German, but in live in Britain.
As a Brit I say this: “God help us!” That’s as a Brit re T. May…
As a German I say this: “Gott hilf uns!” That’s as a German re A. Merkel…
There you are, you getting your money’s worth, two answers for one question. OK, bonus round: If I WERE an American, I’d say this: “God help us!” re Obama/Clinton…
I am spoiling you, am I not?
LR says
DFD
Like your sense of humour…If I ever make it to Britain can I come visit you?
I promise, I am not an ax murderer, or any other kind of criminal.
High Hopes says
It is the strangest experience watching the city you grew up in, London, change beyond recognition. The market my mum would take me to on a Saturday was filled with cockney traders, they are all gone. My heart most goes out to the bewildered elderly who must be completely at a loss to understand what has happened. Diversity is exalted above everything, above the rich culture and history of the UK, utterly heart breaking, I feel blessed I had my twenties and thirties before this wretched state of affairs.
DFD says
I escaped from London about 30 years ago. It’s no longer one of my two home towns. When I have to go to London, it’s a strange city in which I feel as a stranger, and not wellcomed.
Peggy says
I like that “I escaped from London. Makes you feel like a refugee.
gravenimage says
I *do* understand the urge to simply lament, but now is the time to *fight* for your civilized culture.
My mother and aunt both served with the British army during WWII as young women; my mother was a teletype operator and survived the London Blitz, and my aunt drove huge supply trucks in blackout conditions between London and the mouth of the Thames.
Brave Britons have fought for England before, and *have won*. We have a great heritage to live up to.
jamesmi says
She said “Brexit is Brexit”, and I for one am not going to criticise her for not getting the UK out of the EUSSR until she fails to do so. She is not even PM yet. And it is at least possible that she will stop being a Remainer – the recent behaviour of the EUSSR hardly inspires confidence in it. I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt, until it becomes impossible to do so. She will, after all, have those who vote to leave keeping their on eyes on her to see what she does. She is hardly in a position to renege – even if she should be tempted to do so.
Mirren10 says
King Tut says:
” … women have no loyalty to their country and people, only the most alpha cock.”
I expect that lets you out then. 🙂
King Tut says
this is why women have no place in politics. the whole world is laughing at us, as we elect these morons who destroy our nations. women have no loyalty to their country and people, only the most alpha cock
ECAW says
Jesus, you’re one sick bunny aren’t you?
King Tut says
it’s called reality. try living in it sometimes.
JawsV says
Can someone get misogynist “Tut” off this site, which is for civilized people. “Tut” has a little weenie! You’re a Muslim a-hole, “Tut.”
King Tut says
nothing ‘misogynistic’ about it. women aren’t meant to be leaders of nations or people. women were made by nature to be nurturers, and raise their offsprings, take care of their family and their tribe. if you don’t know this, you’re just a brainwashed idiot. but many of you are. all you know is spew your horseshit when you don’t agree with something. dumb cunts.
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“women aren’t meant to be leaders of nations or people. ”
Sahih Bukhari:
Narrated Abu Bakra:
During the battle of Al-Jamal, Allah benefited me with a Word (I heard from the Prophet). When the Prophet heard the news that the people of the Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their Queen (ruler), he said, “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.”
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/92/50
Wellington says
“It’s called reality……”
No, it’s called bigotry and stupidity. I watched the entire eighteen some minutes and while it presented little bits and pieces of the truth at times this video is rank in the extreme. It also misses the real reason why the West is in trouble——–Leftism.
Conservative women and conservative men know how to think and act properly and leftist women and leftist men often do not. Old fashion liberals, who are indeed a dying breed, are also not a problem to civilizational decline as modern liberalism, call it Leftism if you like, is.
Yes indeed, Leftthink is the culprit here, King Tut, and you’ve overlooked this. The pioneering of women’s rights by the West, which you and your ilk look so down upon, is not the problem. Rather, those that reside on the left side of the political, social, cultural and economic figurative semi-circle are. I suggest strongly that you reconsider (but you won’t).
King Tut says
lol “Leftism”. the Jews have completely destroyed America with their open borders, and they use leftist like a bunch of puppets. but I don’t expect any of you to know this on a site like this…
Angemon says
Don’t forget: they also steal shoes when they’re not busy puppeteering the downfall of countries for no apparent reason:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/06/uk-muslim-leader-asghar-bukhari-zionists-stole-my-shoe
King Tut says
Angemon: the truth hurts, doesn’t it? every time I show you facts about Jews, you link me the same article of that muslim nutbag. you must be Jewish, hence why it’s so hard for you to accept facts about Jews. just like muslims have a hard time staring the ugly truth in the face about Islamic Jihad, Islamic Slavery, and Islamic imperialism. that’s not including all the insanity in Islamic doctrine. they call you ‘islamaphobe’, like you cal me ‘anti-semite’. same shit; different toilet.
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“Angemon: the truth hurts, doesn’t it? every time I show you facts about Jews, you link me the same article of that muslim nutbag.”
That “muslim nutbag” is someone you’d probably get very well along with, on grounds of seeing Jewish conspiracies everywhere. Do you have any good reason for me to believe your conspiracy theories over his?
“you must be Jewish, hence why it’s so hard for you to accept facts about Jews.”
“Facts”? You keep using that word – I don’t think it means what you think it does… Anyway, I distinctly remember another user here claiming I was Jewish – and meaning it as an insult. Surprise, surprise, it was a muslim apologist. Are you sure you wouldn’t be better off converting to islam? Under strict islamic law, no women would be in power – look at the hadith I gave you. And certainly no Jews – just look at what happened in Granada, 1066, when a muslim ruler promoted a Jew to vizir.
“just like muslims have a hard time staring the ugly truth in the face about Islamic Jihad, Islamic Slavery, and Islamic imperialism. that’s not including all the insanity in Islamic doctrine.”
Huh, what? Are you f***ing kidding me? Are you aware of the number of muslims worldwide that are unapologetic about the supremacist elements of islam? Who revel in it? Hello? The islamic state? Ring any bells? Asia Bibi? Death penalty for apostates?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg
Anyway, why are you assuming that muslims who refuse to acknowledge the truth about islam do so because they have a hard time facing the truth and not because they’re deliberately lying to advance the cause of islam? Am I really supposed to believe that the local imam that goes “islam is peace” is simply afraid to learn the truth about islam? A f***ing imam? Oh, for f***’s sake.
“they call you ‘islamaphobe’, like you cal me ‘anti-semite’. same shit; different toilet.”
Oh, great, the false equivalence. Did I ever call you anti-semite? And you know I can point out to islamic scripture, commentary, historical precedent and influential muslim leaders, both dead and living, to make and defend my point, right? Can you do the same – point out to Jewish scripture, commentary, historical precedent and influential Jewish leaders, both dead and living,how to defend your insane ramblings?
Seriously, you’re like the stereotype of people who complain about stereotypes. “Women destroy nations, they belong, barefoot and pregnant, in the kitchen, not in leadership roles. Feminism is bringing the West down. The Leftists are to blame for everything. Except it’s the Jews that are behind it all.”
Wellington says
Oh, you’ve moved now to rank anti-Semitism——–“the Jews have completely destroyed America…….”
You know, it’s not smart to fight more than one battle at a time. Why not just stick for the time being to your anti-female rot and wait for another day to spew your anti-Semitic nonsense. Just trying to help you out here.
gravenimage says
Well, it figures that “King Tut” is not just a vicious misogynist, but also a virulent antisemite.
One of the most inadvertently hilarious things about that video is that among a series of pictures of Jews supposedly controlling America on Israel’s behalf is a photo of a man holding a “No More Wars for Israel” sign. Really, these morons can’t even keep their bs straight.
Here’s the creep behind this video–“Real Jew News”:
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=128
By the way, this loon does not believe that 9/11 was Jihad. Instead, he claims it was perpetrated by WTC owner Larry Silverstein.
In another piece, he claims that the 9/11 hijackers were actually “Zionists”..
In other words, “King Tut” is the follower of an idiot who does not believe that Jihad terror exists, but is just a plot by Jews to make Muslims look bad.
Champ says
Graven wrote:
In other words, “King Tut” is the follower of an idiot who does not believe that Jihad terror exists, but is just a plot by Jews to make Muslims look bad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That says a lot …
And thank you, Graven, for pointing this out!
“King Tut”, and his ilk, are enablers of evil and lies. Shame on them.
Champ says
Wow “King Tut” is clearly a “misogynist” and “anti-semetic” perp!
And I think that we are only scratching the surface on all of those whom “King Tut” hates.
Must be a long list …
King Tut says
so first, I was a muslim. then, I was a misogenyst. later, I became a Russian nationalist. and now, I am a follower of Brother Nathanial. typical Jews. spread their lies and propaganda, until everyone in the world believes their shit. you all may wanna go work in Hollywood or NYT. you’ll fit right in, where they pull ‘facts’ straight outta their asses.
I’m done here.
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“so first, I was a muslim. then, I was a misogenyst. later, I became a Russian nationalist. and now, I am a follower of Brother Nathanial.”
Citations needed. Unless, of course, you’re telling us your life story. Oh, and my money is still on stormfag. BTW, are you familiar with the Eyferth study?
“typical Jews. spread their lies and propaganda, until everyone in the world believes their shit.”
Ah, so it wasn’t your life story, you were listing what you were allegedly called. In that case, citations needed.
“you all may wanna go work in Hollywood or NYT. you’ll fit right in, where they pull ‘facts’ straight outta their asses.”
As opposed to you, for example, saying I called you “anti-semite” or claiming someone called you a “russian nationalist”, right? Because those are things that, like, REALLY happened, and it’s not, like, you’re making s*** up and building s*** strawmen because you can’t rebut criticism and stuff.
“I’m done here.”
Awwwww, now who’s going to tell us how women and Jews are behind everything? Why, we just might end up holding muslims responsible for their actions when it turns out they dindu nuffin and it’s all the fault of those wimmin and *argh* juice *ptui* *hack* *coff*
gravenimage says
Thanks, Champ!
gravenimage says
More from “King Tut”:
so first, I was a muslim. then, I was a misogenyst (sic).
……………………………
I don’t think anyone said “King Tut” was Muslim. The idea that being Muslim and “misogenyst” are somehow contradictory is quite bizarre, however–as though Muslims were egalitarians!
More”
later, I became a Russian nationalist. and now, I am a follower of Brother Nathanial.
……………………………
This is where the content from that antisemitic video “King Tut” linked to came from. Check the images–they are the same.
More:
typical Jews. spread their lies and propaganda, until everyone in the world believes their shit.
……………………………
The usual–that anyone who objects to virulent antisemitism must ergo be Jewish themselves. I am a Gentile; I just don’t hold with the crazed hatred of Jews and conspiracy theories about their running the world.
I suppose this helps those like “King Tut” feel better, though–after all, no one listens to him and it is all the fault of the perfidious Joooooooooos…
More:
I’m done here.
……………………………
Is that a promise?
Angemon says
gravenimage posted:
“I don’t think anyone said “King Tut” was Muslim.”
I believe that’s the case. It’s just sand-throwing – a red-herring, a distraction. Poor KT, in ordinary troll fashion, is simply trying to raise a smokescreen – focus on what the big, meanie users here are allegedly telling to and about him and not on what he’s telling to and about others.
Like I said, my money is not on muslim but on stormfag.
“Is that a promise?”
I wouldn’t count on that. Trolls always come back, no matter how many times they claim they are ignoring you, not responding to you or done with you.
gravenimage says
Angemon, you are probably right that “King Tut” will be back. My saying “is that a promise” was very much tongue-in-cheek”. These trolls pop up again and again.
And you may be right about his having links to Stormfront. The loons over there have been ranting about King Tut and “race mixing” for some time now.
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“this is why women have no place in politics. ”
Indeed. Why, just look at vibrant, strong and stable countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran – no women in power as far as the eye can see, right? Well, maybe just Iran – last year, Saudi Arabia allowed some of its women to vote. Why, the knaves even let some women run for office – what were they thinking?
Cool Penguin says
Men in Saudi Arabia have a completely different values system to men in the West.
DFD says
Values ????
Angemon says
P.S.: whom would you prefer to have as the next British PM: Neville Chamberlain, Margaret Tatcher, Tony Blair or Donald Trump?
The Satanic Verses says
Here in Australia the most prominent politicians that speak out against islam (Pauline Hanson and kirralie Smith) are both women. Right now they are doing a much better job than the men at saving our society.
Peggy says
Spot on.
Vickie Janson is also committed to stopping Islamization of Australia. She doesn’t get a platform but she has formed a party called Australian Christians. She was involved with The Q Society of Australia previously.
I have spoken to her a few times and she is passionate and fully committed to stop Islam from taking over.
Pauline Hanson is constantly attacked and even put in prison but nothing has stopped her. I respect her honesty and courage to keep going while being called names and disrespected. We need more people like these great women.
In the election just gone I looked for candidates from these parties to give me vote and preferences to on the green ballot. I was careful where I directed my vote for the senate as well.
Comforting thing is that more and more people are voting this way.
gravenimage says
Here’s some interesting stuff from Vickie Janson:
http://www.vickiejanson.com.au/islam-the-honest-debate-has-been-called
Angry Aussie says
Pauline Hanson is a fantastic voice for the masses. Unfortunately now we have the jihad embracer, Anee Aly, who has command of the seat of Cowan in WA.
I think we can all agree that King Tut is a troll and should be ignored.
Peggy says
Who the Hell voted for her?
Is there a large Muslim population there or just idiots?
gravenimage says
The foul misogynist “King Tut” wrote:
this is why women have no place in politics. the whole world is laughing at us, as we elect these morons who destroy our nations. women have no loyalty to their country and people, only the most alpha cock
……………………………
More vicious bs from “King Tut”. He not only believes that women should not be allowed to enter politics, but that they be barred from *voting*, as well.
Twits like the egregious Theresa May are dangerous–but so are male politicians like Barack Hussein Obama and Justin Trudeau.
“King Tut” is unable to explain strong leaders like Gold Meir and Britain’s own Margaret Thatcher. And then there are figures like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a politician who specifically stands against Jihad.
And there are other staunch Anti-Jihadists who happen to be female–Robert Spencer’s colleague Pamela Geller, Debbie Schlussel, and take-no-prisoners figures like Ann Barnhardt.
And then there are all the Anti-Jihad women here at Jihad Watch.
Really, with “King Tut’s” hatred of women, you’d think he’d be right at home with Islam.
Cool Penguin says
I’m not sure about it being vicious bs. After all, American’s founders barred women from voting and for good reason. Women (at least those under 40) overwhelming vote for leftist, socialist, open-borders governments thus contributing towards the downfall of the West. They also are the most sympathetic towards Muslim “refugees”. The women leaders you cite like Thatcher and anti-Jihad women like Geller are the exception, not the rule.
BTW, I’m not against women voting but I do think the minimum age for women should be raised from what it is now.
Angemon says
Cool Penguin posted:
“After all, American’s founders barred women from voting and for good reason. ”
Most people during history, both men and women, weren’t allowed to vote. Zooming in and focusing on one arbitrary subset and trying to build a narrative around it is the MO of feminists, civil rights “activists”, gay rights “activists”, etc.
Eva says
Cool Penguin, are you joking? Being a woman, I really have to object. So you think that the voting age for women should be raised? What kind of sexist, discriminatory bullcrap are you spouting?
I personally have never voted for a ‘leftist, socialist, open borders government’ in my life and I never will. And I have never had any sympathy for Muslim ‘refugees’ either, and I don’t see that changing. BTW, neither have any of my female friends, or relatives.
Don’t assume that all women, whatever their age, will automatically vote with the crowd. And have you seen any of the demonstrations, rallies and others ‘events’ organised the the supporters of the kind of governments you speak of? Plenty of men there, under and over the age of 40.
gravenimage says
“Cool Penguin” probably also believes that the testimony of a woman is worth half that of a man’s…
King Tut says
lolol having an opinion, does not make you a good leader. who is leading the workforce? MEN! women aren’t build for this. nature made them this way. has nothing to do with ‘hating’ women. wake the hell up!! lol still laughing at your reply… feminism was one of the tools created to destroy the foundation of a healthy family, and western civilization in the process.
Angemon says
King Tut posted;
“lolol having an opinion, does not make you a good leader.”
But having a penis does, apparently. Anyway:
Sahih Bukhari:
Narrated Abu Bakra:
During the battle of Al-Jamal, Allah benefited me with a Word (I heard from the Prophet). When the Prophet heard the news that the people of the Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their Queen (ruler), he said, “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.”
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/92/50
King Tut says
Angemon. I am not a muslim you dumb shit. lmfao!!!
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“Angemon. I am not a muslim you dumb shit. lmfao!!!”
Huh, did I claim you were? I mean, now that you mention it I guess a case can be made that you sound and act like one, but did I ever claim you were? It seems you have a severe comprehension problem, and/or that you’re reading things that aren’t even there to begin with…
For the moment, my money is on “stormfag”, not “muslim. What do you think about May Britt marrying Sammy Davis Jr.? No, wait, I have something a little more recent: Cuba Gooding Jr. and Sara Kapfer 😉
Champ says
“King Tut” wrote:
“…feminism was one of the tools created to destroy the foundation of a healthy family, and western civilization in the process.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A statement like this becomes *profoundly* ironic when posted by someone like “King Tut” …
It’s people like him, whom are void of sound reason and basic common sense, that actually play more of a key role in destroying families and civilizations. But of course pointing this out will be lost on “King Tut.”
It’s very sobering–and kinda scary–to think that weirdos like “King Tut” have access to the internet and are out roaming our streets. And this creep may laugh all he wants, but there is something seriously wrong with him, and his insanity is not the *least* bit funny. He’s either mentally ill or most likely a drunk. Perhaps both. Get help and stat.
Wellington says
“Angemon, I am not a muslim you dumb shit.”
Putting aside the fact that Angemon could place half his brain in total rest-mode and would still be infinitely wiser and more informed than you, I have to tell you that you argue like a Muslim, that is to say when challenged you start spewing insults left and right. Of course, Leftists do this also but I don’t think you’re a Leftist unless in disguise (rather like what Muzzzies are often inclined to do).
So, I am in the abstract interested in why you apparently are possessed of so many pathologies. Oh, you’re a basket case all right; this to me is indisputable. I’m just not certain what specific kind of basket case you are. If I had to put money down on it, I’d say you’re a Muzzie in disguise but I might lose here. Well, if you’re not a Muzzie or a Leftie, then you definitely belong to some other aberrant grouping. Hmmm, I do hope you’re not another rank Russian nationalist who views the West as bad, Islam as bad (though it is), everything is bad except Holy Mother Russia, blah, blah, blah.
Don’t know for sure. Please enlighten, though I must tell you in the interest of both honesty and full disclosure, that enlightenment in general and you don’t strike me as a good fit. Just sayin’.
Your turn. Give it a shot. After all, I could use a good laugh today. Well, wait, you’ve already provided me such. But please, provide another.
gravenimage says
“King Tut” wrote:
lolol having an opinion, does not make you a good leader. who is leading the workforce? MEN! women aren’t build (sic) for this…
………………………………..
And “King Tut” is certainly confirming his own superiority here…sarc/off
King Tut says
“It’s people like him, whom are void of sound reason and basic common sense, that actually play more of a key role in destroying families and civilizations. But of course pointing this out will be lost on “King Tut.””
you sound like a muzzie. “it’s not the fault of the muslims who kiled all those people. it’s the islamaphobes who are bigots and hate muslims”. just STFU already. i can’t read anything else you say beyond this.
gravenimage says
Does it surprise anyone that “King Tut” is now attempting to shut down the speech of people who dare point out the weaknesses in his reasoning?
Champ says
If I “sound like a muzzie”, then it’s clear that there’s something wrong with “King Tut”, because to the *rational* mind there is nothing in what I wrote that might qualify me as a muslim, but to someone like “King Tut”, hmm …
And I’ve hit a huge nerve with “King Tut”, so I must conclude that there’s a measure of truth in what I’ve stated. I sincerely hope that “King Tut” get the help that he so desperately needs.
Champ says
True, Graven. And these dismissive comments from “King Tut” reflect an attitude of superiority–when in fact he’s actually revealing some of his own deep-seated and ugly insecurities.
gravenimage says
Very true.
Champ says
The vile “King Tut” is back with more of his misogynistic rhetoric …
And a misogynist is a person who “hates or doesn’t trust women.”
“King Tut” is lying, since clearly he both hates and doesn’t trust women–which is further punctuated by his use of the crudest term of all: “dumb cunts.”
He made this nasty remark in one of his above comments.
King Tut says
haaaaaahahahahahahahahaahah!!!!!! thx for the laugh, Champ. you douche. oh snap, I must hate all men with that last remake of mine. lmao..
gravenimage says
“King Tut” wrote:
haaaaaahahahahahahahahaahah!!!!!! thx for the laugh, Champ. you douche. oh snap, I must hate all men with that last remake (sic) of mine. lmao..
……………………………….
Why would using the term “douche” mean that “King Tut” hates men? Like “cunt”, “douche” refers–albeit more obliquely–to women’s genitals. When this term is used as an insult to men, it is only by way of expressing contempt towards women.
Never mind that he is also mistaken in the gender of the staunch Anti-Jihadist he is insulting here. Really, how can he keep his errors straight?
Champ says
Graven, this *is* an odd statement. Perhaps “King Tut” concludes that I’m a man? I don’t know, but nothing else makes sense to me.
In fact, NONE of “King Tut’s” offerings make much sense to me.
gravenimage says
Yes, Champ–it sounds as though “KIng Tut” is assuming you are male.
*Hardly* the worst of his errors here, though…
JawsV says
Champ – what can you expect from a throwback with a teeny tiny peeny like Tut? He’s a joke. A Neanderthal. And the Jew-hating shows what a nutball he is. Tut is King Turd.
Champ says
I agree, JawsV. “King Tut” should NOT be taken seriously, but there is something *seriously* wrong with him–that much is clear.
gravenimage says
So true.
Angemon says
King Tut posted:
“the whole world is laughing at us”
You’re British? Not American?
RonaldB says
“this is why women have no place in politics…”
Actually, your conclusion is not supported by your premises.
You speak of different biological imperatives between males and females. Yet, you also recognize (I presume) the wide range of behaviors within groups.
So, voting patterns and individual leadership are two different things. One possible course would be to deny women the vote, as women, but put no barriers to women as leaders. You would not want to deny the opportunity for leadership to someone like Golda Meir or Margaret Thatcher. But, you look at the polling patterns for males and females vis-a-vis Trump and Clinton, and you see very different preferences. Women as a group tend to react more emotionally, and perhaps with different objectives in mind, so there is a question (at least in my mind) if our survival as a society might be enhanced by shifting the electorate more towards rational and self-assertive viewpoints.
The exceptions to general rules bring out very interesting dynamics. Women (including white and non-white) tend to prefer Hillary, while married women in stable family relationships tend to prefer Trump. Hillary, of course, represents symbolically the government as provider and husband-as-last-resort. But, married women with a provider and help-mate for the children are already in a far better situation than the government could provide.
You’re plainly extremely anti-Semitic. But, let’s take your arguments on their merits. You say the open-borders are the result of Jewish supremacist tendencies and plans. However, this tends to conflict with your view of feminism. Sweden, that most feminist of countries, has a very small Jewish population, but is the leading country in diluting its native population and deluding itself as to the benefits of diversity. So, the Jews don’t seem to be necessary for the mixing dynamic. The 1965 bill was the brainchild of Kennedy, a staunch Roman Catholic. So, again the premise of the Jewish puppet-master is not supported.
Similarly, it is the liberal Jews who are even today firm supporters of immigrants and open borders. This simply can’t be denied. I look at their websites periodically. But, the Orthodox Jews, who identify much more strongly and openly as distinctly Jewish, have a higher support for Trump and more conservative policies. So, again, the simple distinction of Jewish versus non-Jewish is not supported. Although, there is the reality that the majority of Jews in the US are liberal, and votes heavily in elections.
You seem to have a conspiratorial view of Jews, working underhandedly to dilute the West for their own benefit. While Jews (some, not all) have definitely been a strong force for diversity and open borders, it is the Jews who are suffering particularly, and who have not yet changed politically. As a country becomes more Muslim, the Jews are harassed and attacked more. Jews are leaving Sweden and France, because Muslims, asserting themselves, make it a point to attack Jews. So, instead of your picture of Jews as super-intelligent controllers and conspirators, Jews come off as rather dim bumblers who are not learning from their mistakes. I’m from a Jewish background myself. It drives me crazy that they’re so blind to their own survival, but they’re some of the nicest people you’ll meet.
Let me say a bit more about the feminisation of Sweden, not from personal experience but from what I’ve read. Do you know there is a movement in Sweden to make standing urinals forbidden? The feminists think it emphasizes masculinity too much, and that men ought to be forced to sit when urinating. I’ve read accounts of divorce and parenthood rights in Sweden. The Swedish legal and social system is viciously aligned against males. Males are not only suppressed in expressing masculinity, but are openly discriminated against in any legal proceeding.
Is this related to the fact that Sweden was the first and strongest welcomer of mass migration of Muslims? Correlation is not causation, so nothing is proven.
I think your musings as to the political consequences of male-female differences interesting and worth mulling over, as a new idea. Your view of Jews is, bluntly, not at all original, and so global and undifferentiated as to not be very useful in further discussion. The 1965 immigration bill was clearly disastrous, but your labeling it as a result of Jewish conspiracy and supremacy ignores the non-Jewish liberals who were instrumental in passing it, and again contributes nothing to the discussion of reversing it.
LR says
Re: Women destroying civilization…Random thoughts.
Dang, good thing England didn’t hear about this when they needed an heir to take the throne after Bloody Mary.
Good leaders are hard to come by. Sometimes we get lucky, whether it be man or woman.
I do agree we better find a better balance in this society between men and women. Men are usually by tradition the protectors, which is the biological imperative, and there has been a bit too much pushing on the ‘feminization’ side. We need to be careful of that, but it won’t make us stronger to go ‘backwards.’
That woman holding a sign saying, ‘will trade racist for rapist’ is crazy frightening.
For some reason I’m thinking of the battle in the Pacific when the Americans being overwhelmingly outnumbered, managed to defeat the sure victory of the Japanese.
It’s not always about numbers, but about organization, determination, and resolve.
Champ says
Margaret Thatcher was a great leader …as are many women.
Schrödinger says
Ivanka Trump for President#2037!
She’s a woman AND a Jew AND she’d make a great President! Just as her father will, very, very soon (it can’t come soon enough). Tut tut …
salim says
I voted for Brexit, not for Theresa May (who is against Brexit). I am disappointed by the decision of the corrupt tory MPs.
It is sad that in countries like the UK and USA, with millions of sane citizens with good integrity, yet they have to chose a leader from a group with least sanity and integrity.
jewdog says
Yes, yesterday Britain was on the edge of the precipice, but thanks to Theresa May, tomorrow she will take a step forward.
DFD says
i am thinking more of a running jump…
Charli Main says
Theresa May is going to teach all us nasty Islamophobes a salutary lesson by banning pig farming and stopping the import of all pork products.
We will no longer be able to insult, offend and upset Muslims by enjoying our daily Ramada Special—-crispy bacon, pork sausages and scrambled eggs.
gravenimage says
Very witty, Jewdog.
LR says
Jewdog,
Hahah…
Julia Kinghorn says
Just read my morning paper and the story of May wasn’t as revealing as your comment Robert. Thanks for enlightening us to her obvious pro Islam bias. She is obviously no Margaret Thatcher which is a drawback not a psositive sighn in my opiinion.It appears that the west is undisputedly voting for weak leaders as we have now in Canada in young upstart Justin Trudeau. He, too has a bent to favour Islam and hopes by visiting mosques he can grab votes while taking selfies of himself and his new friends so he can be sure of re-el;ection in the next election. No wonder we are living in a frightenng world when faced with this type of disconcerting and troubling leadership.
Angemon says
All I have to say about Theresa May is this: she didn’t won any elections for PM. And wasn’t Brexit about, among other things, not wanting to be ruled by unelected bureaucrats?
gravenimage says
Yes.
nic says
NOBODY is elected as Prime Minister in the UK, Angemon. Thats not how our system works.
Individuals are elected as Members of Parliament. They usually belong to structured parties. (like your Republicans and Democrats, but less corrupt… marginally). Each party decides internally who their leader will be, and – assuming that individual is ALSO elected as an MP… they become Prime Minister.
Well… sort of.
gravenimage says
nic wrote:
NOBODY is elected as Prime Minister in the UK, Angemon. Thats not how our system works.
…………………..
Nic, it is true that in Britain one votes for the party, and not for the individual candidate. That being said, it is almost always the case that campaigning is done by individual candidates, and that the public knows whom they are voting for.
It is very rare that–as here–the party just picks someone via the proverbial “smoke-filled room”, without the public’s having any say–but that is exactly what we are seeing here.
JawsV says
Theresa May – an Islam-loving utter disaster for Britain. We just get rid of Cameron and now we get May? Out of the frying pan into the fire? She’s worse than Cameron!
Charli Main says
I, for one, won´t be ” shocked ” to find Theresa May bringing in a musrat or two into her new cabinet.
Mirren10 says
Theresa May’s first cabinet
Brexiteers
Remainers
Theresa May
Prime minister
Philip Hammond
Chancellor
Boris Johnson
Foreign
Amber Rudd
Home
David Davis
Secretary for exiting the EU
Liam Fox
International trade
Michael Fallon
Defence
Damien Green
Work and pensions
Priti Patel
International development
Justine Greening
Education and equalities
Chris Grayling
Transport
Greg Clark
Business and energy
James Brokenshire
Northern Ireland
Jeremy Hunt
Health
Sajid Javid
Local government
Liz Truss
Justice
Karen Bradley
Culture, media and sport
David Mundell
Scotland
Andrea Leadsom
Defra
Gavin Williamson
Chief whip
Patrick McLoughlin
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Natalie Evans
Leader of the Lords
Alun Cairns
Wales
David Gauke
Chief secretary to the Treasury
David Lidington
Leader of the Commons
Mirren10 says
Sorry, that didn’t copy/paste very well.
It’s seven Brexiters, and two mohammedans.
gravenimage says
Mirren, Sajid Javid is MP for Bromsgrove, which is where my grandfather was police superintendent for many years and where my mother grew up. How times have changed…
“UK Muslim MP Sajid Javid – a terrorist sympathizer in the UK Tory political party”
https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/uk-muslim-mp-sajid-javid-a-terrorist-sympatizer-in-the-uk-tory-political-party/
He’s been especially involved in shady “Shari’ah finance”.
Who is the other Muslim?
Mirren10 says
Oops, my mistake, Priti Patel is a **Hindu**, not a mohammedan.
Yes, Sajid Javid stinks to high heaven. God help us now.
TheOldOligarch says
As a Brit, I do not believe Theresa May can last long as Prime Minister. The whole thing is just getting a little too ridiculous. A longstanding pro-EU Prime Minister stands down due to Britain’s decision to leave the EU, to be replaced by…another longstanding pro-EU politician. Add to that the fact that almost nobody actually likes Theresa, she’s a nothing and everybody knows it, she has no legitimacy as nobody voted for her. The clamour for another general election will, within a year of her taking the reigns, become too loud to ignore I think. Of course that raises the question of who else there is to vote for, they’re all nothings. Still, it could force some kind of constitutional crisis when the open hostility of the electorate to everyone on offer is too great to be ignored or concealed.
Wellington says
Trenchant comment, Old Oligarch. Thanks for it from this American who wishes Britannia well but who knows that your country’s elites are even more in denial mode about Islam than mine———-and mine are more than bad enough.
As for May specifically, she has long struck me as a fool. So sad that Britain’s next PM will be even more foolish than its present one (who is foolish enough). Rather like Hillary becoming the next President and going into full idiot mode even further so than the present doofus who occupies the Oval Office. Fools trying to top other fools. Ah, so sadly the story of our era in the West.
The times are out of joint. And not just in Denmark but in most all the West. The fault for this “disjoinment” lies not first and foremost with Islam and their deluded followers but rather with non-Muslim elites in the West who keep making all kinds of excuses for such deluded followers. Theresa May serves as a perfect example here. I wish she didn’t but she does. May her tenure at 10 Downing Street be a short one——for freedom’s sake.
But who will then take her place? I hope not another foolish dhimmi.
gravenimage says
Theresa May–one of the few politicians that is capable of making David Cameron look like an elder statesman…
Out of the frying pan and into the fire. This is not what Brexit was all about.
mortimer says
No the people want a PM to vigorously restart their independence.
Ted Jaeger says
Unfortunately for you English, all your Brexit loving politicians abandoned ship when the going got tough! A look at some hard work and they all had a cup of tea and a lie down! Where is Winston when you need him? I think armed revolution is what you need, if you had anyone with enough balls, or ovaries, to lead it!
DFD says
Hi Ted,
I am Anglo-German, more than 40 years in the UK. Many of us dreaming about a guy called Oliver Chromwell. He rescued Parliament, installed a Republic, things looked up – then he trusted the king…
gravenimage says
I was hoping it would be former London mayor Boris Johnson. Not perfect, but pretty Islamo-savvy by current standards.
Peggy says
Come September it could be someone from UKIP party. We can only hope.
Eva says
I was hoping the same thing. I was very disappointed when it didn’t happen. But even the thought of theresa may as PM makes my blood run cold, never mind the reality. Here’s to forcing an early election….
Westman says
I could be wrong in my belief that it was immigration that swayed the Brexit vote and shocked the “rulers”. And true, May is a disaster at defending her country and should not be PM with her present attitude.
However, I believe the majority of the UK, sans the elite, have more sense than May. Unlike the US, the UK coalition government does not have to wait 4 years for the next election. The government can be re-shuffled on a Vote Of No Confidence if May doesn’t see the light. She may have one of the shortest terms in UK history.
gravenimage says
Theresa May’s only concern about the UK’s borders is that Robert Spencer or Pamela Geller might slip in to the country to warn Britons about the Jihad threat…
Mirren10 says
”I could be wrong in my belief that it was immigration that swayed the Brexit vote and shocked the “rulers”.
I don’t think you are, Westman.
I canvassed for Brexit, and **uncontrolled immigration, open borders, fake refugees, and the faceless Brussel’s beaurocracy (can’t spell it) ** was a consistent theme for most of the people I spoke to.
Interestingly enough, very few cited finance – a huge amount of the scaremongering by ‘remain’, that we would be left isolated, no-one would trade with us etc, was treated with contempt.
”The government can be re-shuffled on a Vote Of No Confidence if May doesn’t see the light. She may have one of the shortest terms in UK history.”
Let’s hope so.
rara says
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/688662/Theresa-May-Sharia-Law-inquiry-Prime-Minister-leader-conservative-party-downing-street
“May sparked controversy when she spoke out in support of the Islamic courts operating in the country, telling the nation they could “benefit a great deal” from Sharia teachings.”
shoehorn of africa says
AND she opposed Brexit. The Tories are in denial of the will of the British people.
gravenimage says
Yes–this is not what Britons voted for *at all*.
John says
The only choice left to oppose this British “Merkel” is UKIP, unless of course the Brits want to accelerate the suicide and invasion of their country by voting Corbyn!
It’s time to change and send the corrupted elite back where they belong: in history garbage bins
Dazed & Confused says
Nothing we the British public could do about it – Nothing it all…..it was an out and out stitch up, where May and Cameron’s “dark arts” friends in the media, smeared May’s “brexit” opposition candidates one by one, until May remained the only candidate on the ballot paper…
If the people truly do get the politicians they deserve, then May and Corbyn show Britain as a kingdom of the inanely nihlistic….Not because they particularly are, but because they wont vote anyone other than the Tory or Labour party……There’s too much dyed in the wool tribalism when it comes to general elections..
Shane Brandon says
Pauline Hanson has backbone.Calls islam for what it is.Muslim’s are not here to assimilate,but to dictate to,dominate.Sharia law is their gambit,and the present government,and the opposition have fallen for their opening moves.
Lawrence says
There is a general failure to realize that only a revolution is going to change things, the Tories are dhimmi through and through. The reasons are several, not only Arab and Muslim business and trade interests, other factors.
And I fear a revolution, yet that is all that can lead to an end to this national suicide policy, this Western suicide policy.
Alex says
Well am sure churchill is so proud of them … If he know it would get to that he would personally give the country to hitler … As its not worthing the fight !!
Truth Seeker says
The Countries who went away from God will end up in Self Destruction. Probably Britain may be Forerunner.
Schrödinger says
There once was a girl named Theresa
Who somehow became Britain’s Prime Minister
With great pomp and much ceremony
Suiting a high ranking but subdued Dhimmi
She most willingly pays the Jizya
citycat says
Teresa May is a weird one, she has a turbulent vibe, a conflict of energies with regard to directions and aspirations.
And the unknown to be dismissed or trampled to dust, type of thing, weird.
Something unexpected.
Maybe it’s just the times that are weird.
There’s a definite change in the air.
What it bodes, well who can tell?
nic says
Thats possibly the most sensible thing anyone in this benighted article has said so far, CityCat.
Myxlplik says
Certainly in regards to her track record, I can’t think of a worse choice. It would be out of character for this woman to follow through with the spirit of Brexit.
This makes no sence.
gravenimage says
It only makes sense in that the remainers intend to stay in power, the will of the British people be damned.
Myxlplik says
I was wondering, is it possible for the Torries to have come up with a worse choice based upon the electoral sentiment behind Brexit?
This is a travesty.
Erik says
As a resident of a continental European country, I’m now thinking that Brexit isn’t such a bad thing.
Good riddance.
Lloyd Miller says
The Queen needs to call for elections now.
Mirren10 says
The Queen has no powers to call an election.
G P says
This is an unmitigated disaster for Britain.
I wasn’t alive in 1938, but why do I get the feeling it is Neville Chamberlain II?
The only difference is that instead of waving a piece of paper and stating there is peace in our time, the appeaser has donned a head containment unit. I guess we’ll know how it plays out if she’s on the cover of Time as person of the year, just like fellow Jew-hater adolf.
Myxlplik says
Oh my, King Troll was having some fun whacking the JW hornets nest….
That’s your only scrap of food from Myx King … master of the trolls 🙂
Dacritic says
I’m not against women leading countries and nations, but where are all the decent ones? You know, the Pam Gellers, the Bridgitte Gabriels…
Mirren10 says
May’s first test. I bet she bottles it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11737286/EU-demands-Britain-joins-Greek-rescue-fund.html