It sounds preposterous. Surely he must have known that rape was unacceptable in the UK and everywhere, no? No. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
But note that even after he was convicted of rape, his deportation order was overturned. A rapist from Somalia is just fine to stay in Britain. But a man from the U.S. who points out that Islam has doctrines of violence? Such a person may not enter the country!
“Convicted Somalian rapist had deportation order overturned before attacking two more women as he ‘did not understand what is acceptable in UK,'” Telegraph, July 3, 2016 (thanks to Mick):
A convicted Somalian rapist who overturned a deportation order went on to rape two more women in Birmingham, with his lawyer arguing “he had a lack of understanding of what is acceptable in the UK”.
Dahir Ibrahim, 31, was sentenced to ten years in prison in 2005 after the first sex attack on a prostitute in Edgbaston.
A judge ordered his deportation after he served his sentence, but he appealed – and was given leave to remain in the UK.
Now Ibrahim, of Handsworth, has been jailed for another 10 years after raping two “vulnerable” women within six weeks of each other in 2014.
Steven Bailey, prosecuting at Birmingham Crown Court, said the first victim left her home in the early hours of September 5 to buy cannabis.
She was approached by Ibrahim, who offered to sell her drugs and persuaded her to follow him down an alleyway. Once there, he threatened her with a Stanley knife and then raped her.
“She was crying and telling him to stop, and started screaming and shouting,” said Mr Bailey.
The woman was beaten during her ordeal before she managed to flee and was helped by a driver.
The second victim was sleeping rough when she was attacked by Ibrahim in the early hours of October 18.
He threatened her with a pair of pliers and a screwdriver before raping her….
Ibrahim had previously admitted two charges of rape, two of possessing weapons and another serious sexual offence.
Jabeen Akhtar, defending, said Ibrahim had come from a country where he had witnessed many atrocities and that he had a lack of understanding of what is acceptable in the UK.
“It was more opportunistic then pre-planned,” he said. “No long-term physical injury was sustained by the victims.”…
It is understood that Ibrahim will finally be deported after serving his latest sentence.

Keith says
These people don’t have a lack of understanding about what is acceptable in the West they are just following their unholy book that tells them it is acceptable to rape non muslim women and kill non muslim men..
The real problem is that western leaders and apologists for Islam either fail to understand the above or they just can’t be bothered to find out what the religion of peace really teaches.
Nuruodo says
I’m pretty sure they don’t want to acknowledge it as it doesn’t fit their lie.
‘Practical Idealism’ and ‘Pan Europa’, was to be the breeding out of Europeans through miscegenation and rape to lower intelligence and culture to the point the mass could be more easily ruled by a clique of inbred bankers and degenerate aristocrats. The words below were written in 1923, and everything that’s happened since has essentially been one long World War
EYESOPEN says
Ah yes, the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan. They even give prizes to EU “leaders” who best facilitate this diabolical “plan”. Ms. Merckel was the recipient of said prize last year.
Marty says
100% pure truth.
In the UK just about every immigrant group has its fair share of criminals
(Europeans immigrating to the US had their fair share too).
However, mohammedans are unique in that their religion is intrinsically evil,
something our politicians pretend not to know.
Perhaps some are so dim that they genuinely don’t realise the devastating effect
mohammedans are having on any community they effect.
Today, a big story online is
“Muslim taxi driver refused to take blind couple because they had guide dog
He refused to drive Charles Bloch and Jessica Graham because of animal
Said: ‘Me, I not take the dog’ before telling them it was because of ‘religion’
Mr Bloch, 22, informed driver it was against Disability Act but he drove off”
I think this was in Leicester, an ancient city with a beautiful small cathedral.
I saw on TV a black UK broadcaster, whose name escapes me, forced to
reverse his car out of a mohammedan enclave in Leicester when met with bricks & bottles
being thrown at his family by mohammedan youths.
He was taking a child to hospital, and, naturally, was perfectly safe driving
through one of the few white (ie non muslim) areas.
Marty says
PS.
Broadcaster was Darcus Howe & the programme was called
“Who’re you calling N –”
He exposed mohammedan contempt for Blacks which is long standing.
In the past when the slave trade was overt, mohammedans castrated all
black males they wanted for their own uses.
Westerners, (equally immoral & wicked), were more intelligent than
mohammedans & used complete males for breeding purposes.
Vile.
But we abolished it while they still practice it.
Any black person who converts to islam is either a low grade
gangster or an ignorant, suicidal, moron.
Charli Main says
Not only were black male slaves castrated by their Muslim owners but any black female slave that became pregnant by her owner, had the child taken away at birth and disposed off.
Countless millions of black slaves were taken into Saudi Arabia and the Middle East by the Arabs, yet a black face in these lands are as rare as rocking horse poo. Blacks were not allowed to breed because there were plenty more available when required by the Arabs.
John Johness says
What do you think would happen to this guy in an Islamic society if he raped Muslim women. He knows exactly, that is why he used the weapons..
We have lost our morality.
His lawyer should be strung up just coming up that that BS. This moron didn’t think of it, it was his lawyer.
There is no neutral criminal lawyer in these cases – and they know.
LB says
Nothing would happen even if he raped a muslim woman in a muslim country. The sharia court would accuse the woman of not being sufficiently dressed (i.e. wrapped in thick layers of cloth around every inch of her body), and the family would most likely murder her to preserve “honor”.
Welcome to Sharia law. Coming soon to a town near you.
Goran Wrambeck says
Sure, the problem is as well that she needs 3 witness even to go to court….
Carolyne says
If a Muslim woman is raped in a Muslim country, she must have two male witnesses to the rape, else she is punished by stoning to death. The charge is adultery. The male doesn’t seem to be punished lacking the two witnesses.
EYESOPEN says
I believe it is FOUR male witnesses to the rape that are needed.
Bob Smyth says
No doubt the next ‘ploy’ to avoid deportation will be to claim that it would be ‘unsafe’ to deport him to Somalia. UK ‘human rights’ lawyers often demand ‘Western conditions’ in the destination country as a pre-requisite before deportation is even considered. With countries like Somalia, these pre-requisites can NEVER be met.
DFD says
Here’s a tiny, very small bit of good news, insignificant in itself, but noteworthy for a tiny bit of hope. Hope in so far that it is some first crack in the dam. A faint glimmer at the end of the tunnel..
In Germany a minor mainstream newspaper, the Saxon Zeitung, has stated that it will as of now (4th of July) ignore the governments “Richtlinie”, that means instruction *NOT TO MENTION* the nationality and origin of criminal perpetrators. It will, with immediate effect, *always* state the nationality and the ethnic background of perpetrators.
Granted, as far main stream is concerned, the Saxon Zeitung is relatively small, mainly in Saxony and there in the capital of the Saxons, i.e., Dresden. So it’s not even the German Federation as such. However, it is a *printed* paper.
But it is a start, and news papers and other media are syndicated. Let us hope that they will remain steadfast, not be brought to heel, nor ‘Charlie Hebdoed’.
My hopes, prayers and best wishes are with them!
Angemon says
Good. May the Saxon Zeitung be the first of many.
TheBuffster says
Thanks for letting us know. It’s good to be aware of such efforts in the right direction.
isabella van der westhuizen says
YEs these guys are fine in the UK
The ones the Brits object to are theo Polish ones who come over to the UK and dare to actually work hard and start building companies and delis which employ people
Those Polish catholics will just never integrate into British society
The Somalis on the other hand fit in just fine
Marty says
I disagree.
I’m a heavy duty “outer” for many good reasons.
But I welcome Poles & all Europeans who come here to
work & pay taxes.
We have a time bomb of fertile muslims outbreeding us & all
Westerners are welcome to help preserve Western values in the UK.
The Poles were great allies in WW2 & they have plenty to fear
from the EU (AKA Fourth Reich run by the hyper rich & the multinationals).
Settle down in the UK, do legitimate, taxable, jobs and you’ll be
greatly valued.
As a Brexit supporter I’m described by “Sir” Bob Geldorf & co as a racist.
Yet I was very fond of a girlfriend with a Polish father & an Indian mother.
Charli Main says
As a generalisation, the problem facing Britain is MUSLIM IMMIGRATION, regardless of the Muslim immigrant´s race, skin colour or country of origin.
Muslims are the only immigrant group that are trying to shove their laws, culture and religion down the throats of everyone else.
You don´t get any of this nonsense from the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Jews living in Britain.
Michael Copeland says
Two-tier justice.
English law states “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”.
The law is not being applied evenly.
Angemon says
Huh, why?
Godwin says
He will continue raping to get his free food n lodging in prison. In fact he should be given 12 strokes of the rattan for him to learn the lesson as not to rape again.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
And the police who foolishly arrested him did not understand what is acceptable in Islam. They should read the Holy Ko-Ran and be informed the next time they’re confronted with an apparent crime. Now they’re stuck with the project of minimizing the damage to a multicultural diversity person of undisputed victimhood. Letting him retain his UK citizenship is a solid start, but it would’ve been better to lose the paperwork and let him walk. We’re smarter here in Minnesota, where the Somali Moslem cabbie who forcibly raped a blonde fare was busted when he parked in a parking lot behind the St Paul police station. Some cops stepped out the rear door to have a cigarette, heard the rape in progress, and arrested him. The paperwork got lost, and our multicultural diversity person of undisputed victimhood person drives his SBA-subsidized cab here to this day. God bless America… and praise Allah.
That’s interfaith understading; that’s what interfaith dialog will get ya.
Michael Copeland says
A Rotherham victim of the muslim sex-slave-taking her clothing to the police.
The police, who included some muslim staff, “lost” it.
This is the era of turn-a-blind-eye.
Jack Diamond says
“our multicultural diversity person of undisputed victimhood person drives his SBA-subsidized cab here to this day” oh well, “no long-term physical injury was sustained by the victims.”
“no long-term physical injury was sustained by the victim” and “he had a lack of understanding of what is acceptable in the UK”, of course the Somali rapist has a lawyer named Jabeen Akhtar, who also happens to be a woman. Cannot she be deported too? Along with her entire firm?
WorkingClassPost says
This is the biggest crock of shit, and his lawyer should be struck off for trying to pervert the course of justice’.
If this Somali had previously been sentenced and jailed for just such a crime of rape, it cannot be argued that he did not know it was wrong when he committed it again on release from prison.
That is impossible and a lie.
And why was the second sentence the same as the first?
He was no longer a first time offender, and neither had the previous detention dissuaded his re-offence, so what was it’s purpose?
Our legal system has been brought into disrepute, yet again.
Rufolino says
The lawyer paid to defend this disgusting individual had to do that: defend him. Unfortunately someone had to do it, it’s the criminal justice system. Naturally, when the accused is innocent it makes more sense than it does in this horrendous case.
WorkingClassPost says
OK, the lawyer has a duty to defend, but he is not allowed to lie in that defence, neither is he supposed to lead the defendant to say untruths, so as to secure an acquittal or reduced sentence.
Lawyers must uphold the law, not pervert it.
Jack Diamond says
She specializes in (Muslim) immigrants and in defending accused rapists.
It’s her thing. Draw your own conclusions.
Here she defended Muslim rapist Sajad Hussain:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3623550/City-centre-club-kicked-drunk-student-19-abandoned-picked-like-prey-virginity-taken-two-rapists-hour-long-ordeal.html
7%Solution says
“It was more opportunistic then pre-planned,” he said. “No long-term physical injury was sustained by the victims.”…
Yes, because most people carry around pliers and screwdrivers and then just happen to rape women.
And really, this lawyer is shameless to expect a mitigated sentence for a rapist in this day and age when mental and emotional trauma often carry as much weight as physical injury; especially in the “touchy-feely” U.K.
abad says
Somalia?????
Just deport his sorry butt back there.
Charli Main says
I hope somebody in prison gets hold of a pair of pliers and rips this Muslim piece of shyte`s b*lls off.
Yeh, Yeh Yeh I know very islamophobic, racist, xenophobic and bigoted of me.
Marty says
There is no such term as “islamophobic”
Any more than naziophobic or pedophileophobic.
It’s not a phobia.
All rational people should hate islam.
TheBuffster says
So the guy goes to prison and serves a 10-year term for sexual assault, gets out, and STILL doesn’t know such crimes are against the law in the UK?
Well, I guess the lawyer didn’t have any other way to attempt to serve his client this second round except to be absurd. And the absurdity didn’t work, so justice will be served in full – another 10-year sentence with deportation at the end.
Kuffar says
Castrate the dog then he won’t need to understand ‘what is acceptable…’
Stephen Rohaty says
Ignorance of the law is no excuse!
Heather says
Do any muslims, anywhere in the entire world, ever date? I’ve never heard of it. Taking out a woman, paying for her, treating her respectfully would be alien to those slimes. They seem to hate women, even though they only exist being birthed by a woman. They’re so vile and evil they couldn’t get a woman hence the taking them. Anyway, I think they’ll all lovers of men’s bits. Sickos.
Guest says
If he was serious about immigration he would read the laws of England and learn what is acceptable. And thanks to the Brexit every Muslim will have to learn that or be deported.
R Cole says
Putting aside the holy books for a moment.
These Muslims have their women in burqas – while they are raping ours!!
What could be more supremacist than that?
Muslim rapes are a blatant act of supremacist violence – against the women of the host country.
Aussirick says
Terrorists and rapists have been aided and abetted by the EU legal system to allow them to remain in Britain, even after they have been found guilty of these crimes, with a legal deportation order from Britain, they appeal to the EU courts and the verdict is overturned as they can only be sent back to a ” SAFE and SECURE environment ” which meets the same standards as the country they are being deported from.
No wonder the BREXIT vote went to the leave group, while here in Australia we have very similar events occurring, recently there was a case where a convicted rapist was allowed to walk free from court, as he was suffering from PTSD, what a load of bullshit, I find it highly offensive as a war veteran who is suffering from PTSD, that this sort of excuse is accepted by a court as a valid reason NOT to jail this animal, does this now mean that I and any other ex service man, can now go out and rape or murder innocent people using the defence ” I am suffering from PTSD?? ” NO, I guarantee that I would be jailed for my crimes, as would any other person committing these crimes, as to the lawyer’s statement, ” no long term physical injury was sustained by the victims ” I find this to be almost unbelievable, could this statement really have come from a woman?? physical or not, the fact is these women were RAPED by this disgusting piece of garbage, and the trauma will stay with them for the rest of their lives.
SuchindranathAiyerS says
This makes him immune in the UK as it makes of Moslems and Dalits in India.
Manuele says
“Convicted Muslim rapist “did not understand what is acceptable in UK” IS THAT RIGHT? IF THAT IS THE CASE, HOW IS IT THAT THESE BASTARDS UNDERSTAND IF THE LEFTIES/LIBERAL OF THE ENGLISH POLITICALLY CORRECT CONTINUE TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR THEM? .