• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Muslim cleric tells Muslims that taking sex slaves is “permissible in Islam”

Jul 31, 2016 5:33 am By Robert Spencer

Ali Hammuda is scolded here by the witless Express: “Hammuda, who was born in Palestine but brought up in Britain does not point out to his group that slavery is both forbidden in Islam and illegal in the UK.” It may be illegal in the UK, at least for now, but slavery is not, in fact, forbidden in Islam. In reality, slavery is taken for granted in the Qur’an, even as it enjoins the freeing of slaves under certain circumstances, such as the breaking of an oath: “Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but He will call you to account for your deliberate oaths: for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom” (5:89). Slaves are to be freed under certain circumstances, but there is no hint that all slaves should be freed.

Muhammad, the supreme example of conduct for Muslims (cf. Qur’an 33:21) bought slaves: “Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported: There came a slave and pledged allegiance to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) on migration; he (the Holy Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man).” (Muslim 3901)

Muhammad took female Infidel captives as slaves: “Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.’ Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives. She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet. The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr.’” (Bukhari 5.59.512) Mahr is bride price: Muhammad freed her and married her. But he didn’t do this to all his slaves:

Muhammad owned slaves: “Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!’” (Bukhari 8.73.182) There is no mention of Muhammad’s freeing Anjasha.

Also, the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri said in April 7, 2016 that a man could offer slave girls to a friend for sex.

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.

Ali Hammuda

“‘Radical’ Islamic cleric tells young British Muslims it is ‘ACCEPTABLE’ to keep sex slaves,” by Fraser Moore, Express, July 30, 2016:

A MUSLIM cleric from a Cardiff mosque where three British jihadis are believed to have been radicalised has told young worshippers it is “permissible” to keep sex slaves.

Ali Hammuda is an Imam at the Al-Manar mosque in the Welsh city, and has been at this post since Nasser Muthana and Reyyad Khan, then 20, and teenager Aseel Muthana left for Syria in 2014.

Now the preacher has been secretly filmed telling a group of young Muslims it is acceptable to keep sex slaves and that the “end of days” is near.

At a halaqa, or religious study circle, he told a group of young worshippers his interpretation of a Hadith, or a saying of the Prophet Mohammed.

He said: “One of the interpretations as to what this means is that towards the end of time there will be many wars like what we are seeing today, and because of these wars women will be taken as captives, as slaves, yeah, women will be taken as slaves.

“And then, er, her master has relations with her because this is permissible in Islam, it’s permissible to have relations with a woman who is your slave or your wife.”…

Hammuda, who was born in Palestine but brought up in Britain does not point out to his group that slavery is both forbidden in Islam and illegal in the UK.

The recording was made just weeks after reports of Islamic State atrocities against minority Yazidi women in northern Iraq in October 2014.

Moderate Muslim clerics moved to blast Hammuda, who has a reputation in Wales as an extremist.

Imam Shahid Raza told the Mail: “That Hadith is interpreted as justifying sexual slavery only by Daesh types.

“You have to realise that slavery is both banned in Islam and also banned by the law of the land.”…

Hammuda last night condemned the actions and ideology of ISIS and said his words had been “taken out of context”…./blockquote>

What’s the proper context? The Muslims who constantly cry that their words have been “taken out of context” when those words come back to embarrass them never bother to explain the proper context.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, journalistic bias, slavery, Taqiyya, United Kingdom, War is deceit Tagged With: Ali Hammuda, Express


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Michael Copeland says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:01 am

    “Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam.”
    Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan,
    professor, imam and eminent Saudi scholar.
    http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/slavery-part-islam-%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%80%9C-muslims-speak

    • mortimer says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 9:38 am

      Unimpeachable authority of Islam. This proves Islam is incompatible with modernity and irreconcilable with morality. Islam is IMMORAL and opportunistic because is does not contain the Golden Rule. Islam should be condemned by all decent people on MORAL grounds. ISLAM LEGALIZES RAPE OF MARRIED WOMEN.

      • Ralph Statum says

        Jul 31, 2016 at 12:43 pm

        Muhammad was a pedophile, a narcissist, a mass murderer, an assassin, a looter, a lecher, a torturer, a terrorist, a cult-leader, a misogynist, and a rapist

        “… Muhammad was a great leader. He fought many offensive battles, tortured, looted and killed innocent people and raped their women, assassinated his critics, ordered mass murder, addicted to pedophilia and reduced thousands of others into slavery in the name of God. His conduct was ungodly. But he also successfully twisted the sense of morality of his followers, distorted their sense of Humanness and linked doing good and a service to God to all ungodly things …”

        “… If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. Islam owes its success to terrorism. The prophet of Islam boasted, “I have been made victorious with terror”. [Bukhari: 4.52. 220] Since the day Muhammad set foot in Medina, he started his campaign of terror. His followers have been doing the same ever since …” Definition, Symptoms & Cause of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder

        “ISLAM: EVIL IN THE NAME OF GOD” Death Punishment for Apostasy in Islam
        “Allah Allows Sex With Pre-Puberty Kids!”

        Islam is the biggest pedophilia ring & the biggest mad house on earth. The better a Muslim follow & imitating the model “par-excellence” & (page 61) Khayru-l-Khalq (the Best of Creation, Q33:21) the better is it for him!

        • Shane says

          Aug 1, 2016 at 10:17 am

          Islam is incompatible with our Western values of freedom of speech, religion, the press and the equality of women. Liberals who favor bringing in large numbers of muslims into the West are either ignorant or are trying to destroy our civilization.

  2. Infidel from Down Under says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:22 am

    But this arsehole is either blissfully unaware or chooses just to ignore and thumb his nose to the fact that in Britain as in in any other Western Democracy despite what the Holy Koran and Mohammad the Pedophile preached, sex slavery is highly illegal and culturally unacceptable in our civilized lands

    If he has a problem with that he needs to hop on his camel and go back to the sixth century tent in the Arabian desert

    • John spielman says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 8:06 am

      No, he needs to have his citizenship stripped and deported back to crapistan

  3. WorkingClassPost says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:27 am

    It doesn’t say who did the secret filming, was it an undercover reporter, or is there really a moderate muslim in Wales after all?

  4. Mubarak says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:38 am

    It is all very bad.
    But what about the sex-ethics in our culture?
    A girl can have several boyfriends with whom she can engage in sex for free and without bonds and then choose one of her boyfriends for a certain length of time and have a child or children with him, before she changes to a new one with whom to have children – that is getting quite normal these days. Or she can use contraceptives, have abortions and this way avoid having children, so that she can pursue a career. And there are other variations of a sex life that demonstrates your right to do with your body as you like and your lusts propel you.
    Is that the antidote to Muslims promoting sex slavery?

    • Lesley says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 7:10 am

      Mubarak, in our way of life a woman has as much right to choose their actions as a man.

      Some males make choices that are less than ideal, and it is the same with some females. However, females and males equally enjoy the FREEDOM to do so.

      Slavery in any form regresses humanity and degrades civilization.

      While any portion of the population is oppressed in such a way, there can be no true growth or innovation… aside from it being barbaric and wrong 🙂 which it most certainly is.

    • Mr Flagio says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 10:27 am

      Right now it is a b s o l u t e l y not about Western sexual ethics. What kind of sex life other people are having is none of your or my concern. As long as they don’t harm anybody else it is ok. So stop worrying about it. The discussion right now is about what this imam is preaching and which we consider wrong.
      To name it: he is preaching that RAPE is ok. This we cannot permit.

    • kangi_nunpa says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 4:47 pm

      Mubarak has amply shown previously that he is a member of the religion of piss.
      Don’t feed the troll.
      Anyone who makes excuses for, attempts to draw moral equivalences with, or otherwise concedes to that travesty of a belief system should rightly be assumed to be a member.

      The useful way to engage those conducting jihad is with Hellfire missiles, or not at all.

      • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

        Jul 31, 2016 at 9:02 pm

        Kangi: ‘The useful way to engage those conducting jihad is with Hellfire missiles or not at all.’ PERFECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • Keys says

        Jul 31, 2016 at 9:20 pm

        Yes, kangi_nunpa, what you say is understandable because you know what Islam is when you say “The useful way to engage those conducting jihad is with Hellfire missiles, or not at all.” And, “Don’t feed the troll.”

        Remember, though, that there are some JW readers (and JW visitors) who do not know what you know about the “religion of piss.”

        Therefore, when the more knowledgable JW posters respond to the usual trolls, including abas and mubarak, it puts them in their place and counters what they say with the truth not letting their deceitful comments stand undisputed.

        • kangi_nunpa says

          Jul 31, 2016 at 11:13 pm

          Yes, but in the thread above, knowledgeable JW posters didn’t really weigh in. Instead, Mubarak couched his posts in subtlety – invoking Jesus and pretending not to be Muslim.
          Someone needed to make it clear that he is nowt but a troll – lest people be suckered in.

    • maghan says

      Aug 1, 2016 at 12:48 pm

      Hypocrite, you are missing the fact that Islam recommends temporary marriages to slake the “emergency thirsts” of Arab savages. If men can do exactly what you claim that females shouldn’t do–then why not? Males and females have equal rights in civilized societies not the stupid nonsense that the illiterate so-called Prophet ordained–that Allah made males superior to females.

      The Prophet was a master rapist and pedophile–and as the “most perfect human that ever lived,” females can seek to emulate that too.

  5. Nigel GFF says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:56 am

    Should someone inform Prime Minister May of this 1400yrs modern curse.
    (Comment section, of Express article, ‘not available’).

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/30/we-will-lead-the-way-in-defeating-modern-slavery/

  6. isabella van der westhuizen says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:58 am

    Get over it guys it is only a problem when it turns out some scion of American or European history owned slaves. If we find that out then we boycott all institutions named after that individual etc
    We still take their money if there is a scholarship or the like
    But when it comes to the Prophet we do not worry if he kept slaves
    Have you not learn basic hypocrisy from your lecturers

    • Karen says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 10:13 am

      Excellent points!!!

  7. Charli Main says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 7:00 am

    Sharia May is all in favour of Islamic courts and Muslims living outside the remit of British Common Law, in the parallel societies that they have created for themselves in Britain.

    It would be poetic justice if some randy imam pounced on Sharia and dragged her off to his hovel as his infidel sex slave. He could always trade her in for a good looking goat when his ” right hand” gets tired of her.

    • DFD says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 1:13 pm

      Clap, clap, applause!

      I think she wasn’t aware that slavery is legal in Islam, sharia, etc. She thought perhaps it’s those Irish Gypsies and some Balkan Muslims (eastern {lower case} EUROPEANS [**UPPER CASE**]) who “own” and operate slave gangs. I.e., easy headlines and press approval.

      She must be surprised about this, perhaps…

      Mind you, in her shock, Mrs. Sharia-May could permit even more sharia courts – what am I writing? She’s going to permit more of them anyway. So, … oh crap! Sunday afternoon…

      See you.

  8. Lizzy says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 7:39 am

    Sex slavery has been going on and ignored by the authorities for years in the UK, the most high profile case being Rotherham but not much different to any other town and city where sex slavery has been and is still rife.

    Vulnerable young white girls, drugged and made drunk, passed around muslims to cruelly abuse. Social services had removed many of these girls from homes they thought were unsuitable and then turned a blind eye to the abuse of the girls by muslims while they were in the care of the local authority.

    Councillors, MPs, police, social services etc., etc. did nothing for years to rescue and protect these girls.

    May they all rot in hell and may the abusers rot alongside them with great suffering.

  9. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 8:18 am

    That is Islam, it’s the way they’ve always been and are now. It’s right there in black and white in the scriptures and the Sharia legal codes, in plain black and white. It’s also in their history. But it’s verboten for us to note this indisputable fact, in public at least, and few will bring it up even in private.

    So with that set up they are changing us. How’s it going with the investigation of the gang rapers of Lara Logan in Tahrir Square? The investigation of en masse pedophile sex slavery in Rotherham, does it exist? And what’s the progress on the New Years Eve celebratory rape of 78 women in Cologne? And how about all the rape in Oslo and Stockholm. Let me rephrase that, they’re not changing us, we are changed.

    • Lizzy says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 8:49 am

      Not just Rotherham. Link shows a map of towns and cities in England where grooming gangs operated and still operate for all we know.

      https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/muslim-grooming-paedo-map/

      • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

        Jul 31, 2016 at 10:17 am

        It looks like Rotherham is just the best known of the unknown Moslem pedophile sex slavery rings. Thanks for the link, not that I enjoyed seeing it.

  10. berserker says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 8:33 am

    “You have to realise that slavery is both banned in Islam and also banned by the law of the land.”
    – Is this true? When did that happen?

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 1:23 pm

      He probably means countries like Saudi Arabia which under pressure from the West made slavery officially illegal (in 1962) and continues to practice it unofficially (the buying and selling of servants, indentured servitude, human trafficking etc). In no way, of course, is slavery “banned” by Islamic law or teachings, just the opposite.

  11. Mubarak says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 9:00 am

    In the West we promote “All sex, all the time” (Dalrymple) and the Muslims do the same under sharia and culminating in heaven.
    The main and most potent vehicle for sin in the Muslim world of ideas is sharia and in the West it is “freedom”/lawlessness. BDSM relationships are examples of slavery in the West, and they are introduced in the name of freedom.
    Philosophers talk about the identity of relative opposites, and that is what it is all about.

    • Angemon says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 9:42 am

      Mubarak posted:

      “In the West we promote “All sex, all the time” (Dalrymple) and the Muslims do the same under sharia and culminating in heaven.”

      First fo all, citation needed. I certainly have not promoted what you claim, nor do I see it promoted. Second, don’t be disingenuous – we in the West do not call for or promote sexual slavery, which is the topic of this article. It is considered a heinous crime, not a divine commandment.

      “The main and most potent vehicle for sin in the Muslim world of ideas is sharia and in the West it is “freedom”/lawlessness.”

      That makes no sense.

      “BDSM relationships are examples of slavery in the West, and they are introduced in the name of freedom.”

      You think that people who engage in BDSM are *owned* by other people? OK, so you’re just incredibly ignorant – you think of BDSM as going to someone’s house, kill the men and take the women and children to use as sex slaves and sell them to someone else once they’re tired of them. That’s what ISIS is doing to Yazidi women and that’s what you’re comparing to BDSM.

      • Mubarak says

        Jul 31, 2016 at 10:28 am

        “I certainly have not promoted” – Read the article of Theodore Dalrymple. I suppose you haven’t influenced m)any by the things you promote in comparison with the sex-gurus mentioned in the article? – – –
        Our minds in the West are subject to enslavement just as well as the Muslim mind. We can all be owned and influenced by “evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world” and “mighty powers in this dark world” and “evil spirits in the heavenly places.” – Ephesians 6. Do you believe that? – – –
        We can have ideas, but when evil and unclean ideas have us, we are enslaved – and that is what I am talking about.

        • Ray Sears says

          Aug 1, 2016 at 6:33 pm

          ** MUSLIM TROLL ALERT ** MUSLIM TROLL ALERT ** MUSLIM TROLL ALERT **

          THIS MUSLIM FREAK IS IN ” MUSLIM FREAK ” WHO SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED NEAR ANYONE’S CHILDREN OR WIFE ! AFTER ALL, MOHAMMED LOVED SEX WITH CHILDREN, CROSSDRESSING, RAPE, THEFT, MURDER, AND GETTING F* CKED IN THE ASS ! ( FACT IS: HE BRAGGED ABOUT IT ! ) AND ALL GOOD MUSLIMS MUST EMULATE MUHAMMAD TO BE A GOOD AND TRUE MUSLIM ! ( SEE QU’RAN )

        • Angemon says

          Aug 2, 2016 at 3:29 pm

          Mubarak posted:

          “Read the article of Theodore Dalrymple.”

          Theodore Dalrymple isn’t posting here – you are. And you know that appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, right? Theodore Dalrymple did not try to equate BDSM and slavery, you did. Where is this notion of “al sex all time” being promoted and how is BDSM slavery?

  12. David, Thailand says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 9:21 am

    Doesn’t matter, the only influence Express readers have upon the world is every few years when they’re allowed to vote.

  13. Angemon says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 9:36 am

    A MUSLIM cleric from a Cardiff mosque where three British jihadis are believed to have been radicalised has told young worshippers it is “permissible” to keep sex slaves.

    What do you think that the people he “radicalized” are are prevented to go to, for example, Syria, will do while in England?

    Imam Shahid Raza told the Mail: “That Hadith is interpreted as justifying sexual slavery only by Daesh types.

    Don’t forget “islamophobes” – it’s only “islamophobes” and devout muslims who point out to the quran, ahadith, commentaries and historical precedent and go “you know, islam does allow slavery, including sex slavery”. Everyone else just goes “this does not mean what it says and how it’s been interpreted thorough history, it means something entirely different”.

  14. mortimer says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 9:49 am

    JOURNALISTS AND THEIR EDITORS ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOB WITH REGARD TO ISLAM.

    They would not send out uninformed reporters to cover a story about sports, science, politics or fashion, but they regularly think NO SPECIAL TRAINING IS REQUIRED IF THE STORY INVOLVES ISLAM.

    This is shoddy journalism and shoddy editing. It creates SLIPSHOD and INACCURATE coverage of Islam stories!

    Shame on the editors.

  15. sham says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:02 am

    !!! BREAKING NEWS!!!!

    ‘Israel behind Bangladesh killings’

    As a government minister tried to portray the recent attacks as part of a conspiracy involving Israel’s Mossad spy agency, security forces waged deadly gunbattles with members of a homegrown terrorist group.
    Speaking to AFP on Tuesday, Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan again linked the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) to the attacks, saying they were part of a wider conspiracy that also involved Mossad.
    “These killings are part of a national and international conspiracy. Those who are carrying out these incidents are communicating with Mossad,” Khan told AFP.
    Two “high-ranking” members of the Jamayetul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) were shot dead in a battle in Dhaka and another was killed in a northwestern district, police told AFP.
    The two JMB members killed in the capital had roles “in most of the recent attacks” including the bombing of a Shiite mosque and the murder of a liberal professor, said deputy commissioner of police M.R Khaled. The third victim was killed in another gunfight in the town of Godagari in the northwestern district of Rajshahi, said local police chief Abu Forhad.
    Bangladeshi authorities have been coming under mounting international pressure to end the string of attacks on religious minorities and secular activists that have left more than 40 people dead in the last three years.
    Authorities have blamed homegrown militants for the attacks, which have surged in recent weeks, rejecting claims of responsibility from Daesh and a South Asia branch of Al-Qaeda.
    Daesh claimed the latest victim, Hindu priest Ananda Gopal Ganguly, whose head was nearly severed. The group, through its Amaq news agency, said it “assassinated” the priest, according to the SITE monitoring group, as he was walking to prayers.
    Farmers discovered Ganguly’s body in a rice field near his home in the village of Noldanga in the western district of Jhenidah.
    Investigators said the murder bore the hallmarks of recent attacks by local extremists who have carried out 10 other similar killings in the last 10 weeks.
    Witnesses saw three unidentified men on a motorcycle attack him with a bamboo stick before “they slit his throat,” the district’s deputy police chief Gopinath Kanjilal said.
    “He left home this morning saying that he was going to a Hindu house to offer prayers,” Kanjilal told AFP.
    “Later, farmers found his near-decapitated body in a rice field.”
    Although most of the recent attacks have been claimed by Daesh or the local offshoot of Al-Qaeda, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government has blamed its domestic opponents for the attacks.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Aug 1, 2016 at 9:34 am

      Nonsense. Absolute bloody garbage.

      Buzz off, peddlar of nonsense-and-lies.

      You do realize that when you spew this sort of garbage, sane and decent westerners of normal intelligence are **absolutely repulsed**??

      When ever you start spewing garbage about how ‘da jooooz’ are responsible for ghastly mohammedan jihad murders, and pretending that Islamic State is not Islamic, all you do is give intelligent Infidels a window into what it is that Islam does to the human mind and soul… and it ain’t a pretty sight.

    • Angemon says

      Aug 2, 2016 at 12:12 pm

      Muslims spouting conspiracy theories involving Jews? How is that “breaking news”?

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Aug 2, 2016 at 1:04 pm

        Ange, the video which you posted can not be viewed in this country, as stated by a notice that prints across the blank screen when one tries to view the video. ?

        • Angemon says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 9:27 am

          Odd. Look up “latma tv egyptian minister of conspiracy” on YouTube. It’s a 3:20 video.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 12:05 pm

          Thanks, Ange, but I tried that as well. I keep getting a message that the video is blocked in this country.?

        • Angemon says

          Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 pm

          🙁

  16. Singh the Sikh says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:09 am

    While Muslims obesses and salivate over sex slaves, and Islamists revel in their umpteenth ‘Allah hu Akbar’ murder, Israeli scientists have just discovered a way to harvest drinking water from thin air.

    Conclusion
    Yet more evidence that the world can certainly do without the utterly useless and destructive Islamists, their bullshit Allah, and paedophile prophet mohamed, but not without the ingenious Israelis, who contribute far more to the world than the entire Muslim ummah combined. All they good at is being miserable and spreading misery to the rest of the world.

  17. sham says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:10 am

    ISLAM ORDERED FREEING /MARRING /GIVE EDUCATION /KEEP GOOD MANNERS TO SLAVE GIRL
    Bukhari :: Book 4 :: Volume 52 :: Hadith 255
    Bukhari :: Book 4 :: Volume 55 :: Hadith 655
    Bukhari :: Book 3 :: Volume 46 :: Hadith 720,723
    Bukhari :: Book 7 :: Volume 62 :: Hadith 20, 98
    Muslim :: Book 8 : Hadith 3327,3327
    Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 285
    Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash’ari:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “If a person teaches his slave girl good manners properly, educates her properly, and then manumits and marries her, he will get a double reward. And if a man believes in Jesus and then believes in me, he will get a double reward. And if a slave fears his Lord (i.e. Allah) and obeys his masters, he too will get a double reward.”
    Slave illegal sexual intercourse /adultery prohibited:
    Bukhari :: Book 7 :: Volume 62 :: Hadith 148
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “O followers of Muhammad! There is none, who has a greater sense of Ghira (self-respect) than Allah, so He has forbidden that His slave commits illegal sexual intercourse or His slave girl commits illegal sexual intercourse. O followers of Muhammad! If you but knew what I know, you would laugh less and weep more!”
    Adultery with slave girl prohibited, stone death punishment:
    Dawud :: Book 38 : Hadith 4405
    Narrated Nu’aym ibn Huzzal:
    Yazid ibn Nu’aym ibn Huzzal, on his father’s authority said: Ma’iz ibn Malik was an orphan under the protection of my father. He had illegal sexual intercourse with a slave-girl belonging to a clan. My father said to him: Go to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and inform him of what you have done, for he may perhaps ask Allah for your forgiveness. His purpose in that was simply a hope that it might be a way of escape for him.
    So he went to him and said: Apostle of Allah! I have committed fornication, so inflict on me the punishment ordained by Allah. He (the Prophet) turned away from him, so he came back and said: Apostle of Allah! I have committed fornication, so inflict on me the punishment ordained by Allah. He (again) turned away from him, so he came back and said: Apostle of Allah! I have committed fornication, so inflict on me the punishment ordained by Allah.
    When he uttered it four times, the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: You have said it four times. With whom did you commit it?
    He replied: With so and so. He asked: Did you lie down with her? He replied: Yes. He asked: Had your skin been in contact with hers? He replied. Yes. He asked: Did you have intercourse with her? He said: Yes. So he (the Prophet) gave orders that he should be stoned to death.

  18. Karen says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:11 am

    Gratifying that here and there a few “scholars” put their foot in it, and publically state their true beliefs. A few get caught and suffer some humiliation, hence the predicable claims about being quoted out of context.

    One theme that is constant when Islam apologists discuss slavery goes something like this; yes, the Koran and Hadith support slavery, but the *intention* is that it would gradually end over time. (Is that intention stated anywhere in the Koran?) Or, that the Koran never explicitly states that slavery would endure forever. (Hmmmm, does it explicitly say it would end?) Unfortunately, one can find support both for and against slavery in the Koran.

  19. sham says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:12 am

    Has not the Qur’an actually legalized adultery by allowing for
    the master to have sexual relationships with his female slaves?
    Female slaves are the natural by-product of the system of
    slavery. The situation that prevailed in all societies where the institution
    of slavery existed was such that slave women were used at will and
    were employed to gain economic advantage by inciting them towards
    prostitution. As for Islam, it provided for a facility which would, in the
    course of one generation, bring an end to the system through the slave
    women themselves.
    The slave woman is the property of the master. However, the
    master has no right, whatsoever, to incite her towards adultery. Like the male slaves, the female slaves, too, have rights of their own. It is
    the duty of the master to provide her with food, shelter, clothes and
    other necessities. Moreover, the Qur’an has asked the owner to make
    the necessary arrangements for her marriage as well (Qur’an 24:32).
    This, in effect, means that the Qur’an has prompted the owner
    towards having sexual relations with an unmarried female slave. This
    permission is however restricted to the owner alone. No one else is
    allowed to use her in this fashion even if it be with the permission of
    the master!
    In giving birth to the child of the master, the slave woman
    becomes entitled to new rights. Thenceforth, the master has no right
    to sell her. She becomes the mother of her master’s children. These
    children, too, become entitled to all the rights and privileges enjoyed by
    the master’s other children. Islam disagrees with the Jewish stand
    that the children born through a slave woman have none of the rights
    that should naturally be given to them by virtue of paternity. These
    children are, in all respects, his own children. There is to be no
    discrimination of any kind between them and the other children. With
    the death of the master, the slave woman, who is the mother of his
    children, becomes a free woman. She is then protected by her own
    children. They, too, like the other children, will becomes entitled to a
    share in their father’s inheritance.
    The permission to accept slave women as one’s life-partner
    was, in fact, a provision which would, in the course of one generation,
    cut out the very root of slavery. In reality, therefore, the permission
    granted for having relations with slave women was one among the
    many unique steps taken by Islam in practically eradicating slavery.
    It is not possible to equate the permission given for having
    relations with slave women to adultery. These acts stand at two extreme
    poles. One is the case of the woman who lives under her master
    enjoying the protection that he confers upon her. It is a relationship in
    which he fully agrees to take up the responsibilities that may result as
    a product of that relationship. It is a relationship in which her personality,
    beyond the contours defined by sex, is accorded full recognition. It is
    a relationship which opens to her the door to freedom. As for the
    second, it is nothing but a carnal relationship with a prostitute without
    any sort of commitment. The position of the prostitute is, in fact, much
    worse than that of the slave woman. For, she is nothing more than a
    soul less animal. Her function is restricted solely to the gratification of
    the animal passions of man. There is not even a grain of love and
    compassion in that relationship, not the slightest touch of personal
    fulfillment even. It is but a transaction made solely for money. Flesh
    trade! The man who comes for the satisfaction of carnel of his desire
    is never prepared to take up the responsibility that may accrue from it.
    He has no obligation towards her. She is only an animal destined to
    satisfy his sexul appetite. Each one of her relationships will serve only
    to immerse her even deeper into the mire that is the inhumanity of
    prostitution. Even the very dream of freedom is alien to her. She is one
    doomed to embrace the loneliness of orphanhood when in a diseased
    state, with her skin wrinkled and faded, she ends up being the object
    of nobody’s concern.
    What, then, of the tradition which lays open, before the slave,
    the very door to freedom? And what of the rottings system which
    drives the woman from one dependence to the other? Any comparison,
    whatsoever, between these two is impossible because they stand at
    two opposing and extreme poles. One recognized by benign humanism,
    the other which leads to depredation and frustration.

    • Karen says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 10:42 am

      “The permission to accept slave women as one’s life-partner was, in fact, a provision which would, in the course of one generation cut out the very root of slavery.”

      Eloquent words, until one questions why the slave was created and possessed in the first place. Muslim conquerors didn’t “accept” slave women, they *created* slave women (excepting of course the subset of the conquered who were already slaves.) How does one balance the benefits of being the mother of the master’s children against being kept “naked from the waist up”, as the Koran commands? It’s folly to try to frame one type of slavery as more beneficial than another, since they had different purposes. Muslim slavery, like Muslim polygamy, is intended to build the base of Muslim believers, while degrading non-Muslims. Providing sex slaves to Muslim warriors, both today and 1400 years ago has been a very effective requiting tool for Jihadis.

      Did Muslim slavery end in one generation? Nope, it even continues today.

      Slavers and their descendants in the American South often liked to point out how kind they had been to their slaves. Well, that’s nice, but not very good moral basis for the institution.

      Agree with your comment that slavery and sexual immorality cannot be equated. But that doesn’t make slavery a more desired state, nor an elevating experience.

    • Klaas says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 12:41 pm

      Let me explain the perversity of what you are saying with an example.

      Imagine you are a woman in the prime of her life, and in front of you is a muslim man, who says: “I have good news and bad news. The bad news is that I just killed your father, your brothers and your sons, and I took you captive. The good news is that I will now have sex with you. If you get pregnant, you may eventually become free. If not, we just have to keep trying. Of course I am only doing this as a favor to you.” How can there be any love in such a relationship? And what if she does fall in love with someone else and has sex with him? As you say in an earlier post, that man will be stoned to death! It is shocking to me that a human being can defend such a point of view.

      Apart from being immoral, this “brilliant” plan of Allah has also been an utter failure. As Karen points out above, slavery did not stop after Mohammed. Arab (and therefore muslim) slave traders have rounded up slaves from all over north Africa for transportation to America and other places, and millions, perhaps tens of millions of people have died before they even arrived. Slavery still exists today in parts of the muslim world. If Allah/Muhammed had simply declared that slavery is punishable by the eternal fire of hell, perhaps all this would have been avoided.

      Which brings me to the next problem. The many quran verses that talk about sex with slaves as if it is a normal part of life (as it was in the seventh century) are frozen in time. They will remain in the quran forever for people like ISIS/Daesh to use as justification. It is completely irrelevant if you or I conclude that their interpretation is wrong. If the quran had simply stated “slavery is forbidden”, they would not have that argument.

      Dear sham, I feel sorry for you. You are obviously in a deep internal struggle, because you have understood that your religion is perverse, but you are still in the denial stage. So you look for excuses and for comparable perversity in the western world. But in the western world we have no trouble admitting that many things are wrong, and we are trying to to something about it. And since we are not constrained by customs from the seventh century, at least we have a chance of doing that. The muslim world is doomed to remain in the seventh century forever. Get out of that religion, sham. You will feel better.

    • Wellington says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 1:37 pm

      “Islam disagrees with the Jewish stand……”

      Uh, sham, Jews no longer engage in slavery as most all peoples in antiquity did. But Muslims to this day think slavery is just fine, thus demonstrating quite well a major distinction between the Bible and the Koran, to wit, the former is often only descriptive, for one time and place only, while the Koran is always prescriptive. Get this?

      And while you’re at it, why don’t you go on record here at JW and tell us all whether you think slavery of any kind should still continue in today’s world. No prevarication here. A yes or a no.

  20. sham says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:13 am

    the male slaves, the female slaves, too, have rights of their own. It is
    the duty of the master to provide her with food, shelter, clothes and
    other necessities. Moreover, the Qur’an has asked the owner to make
    the necessary arrangements for her marriage as well (Qur’an 24:32).
    This, in effect, means that the Qur’an has prompted the owner
    towards having sexual relations with an unmarried female slave. This
    permission is however restricted to the owner alone. No one else is
    allowed to use her in this fashion even if it be with the permission of
    the master!
    In giving birth to the child of the master, the slave woman
    becomes entitled to new rights. Thenceforth, the master has no right
    to sell her. She becomes the mother of her master’s children. These
    children, too, become entitled to all the rights and privileges enjoyed by
    the master’s other children. Islam disagrees with the Jewish stand
    that the children born through a slave woman have none of the rights
    that should naturally be given to them by virtue of paternity. These
    children are, in all respects, his own children. There is to be no
    discrimination of any kind between them and the other children. With
    the death of the master, the slave woman, who is the mother of his
    children, becomes a free woman. She is then protected by her own
    children. They, too, like the other children, will becomes entitled to a
    share in their father’s inheritance.
    The permission to accept slave women as one’s life-partner
    was, in fact, a provision which would, in the course of one generation,
    cut out the very root of slavery. In reality, therefore, the permission
    granted for having relations with slave women was one among the
    many unique steps taken by Islam in practically eradicating slavery.
    It is not possible to equate the permission given for having
    relations with slave women to adultery. These acts stand at two extreme
    poles. One is the case of the woman who lives under her master
    enjoying the protection that he confers upon her. It is a relationship in
    which he fully agrees to take up the responsibilities that may result as
    a product of that relationship. It is a relationship in which her personality,
    beyond the contours defined by sex, is accorded full recognition. It is
    a relationship which opens to her the door to freedom. As for the
    second, it is nothing but a carnal relationship with a prostitute without
    any sort of commitment. The position of the prostitute is, in fact, much
    worse than that of the slave woman. For, she is nothing more than a
    soul less animal. Her function is restricted solely to the gratification of
    the animal passions of man. There is not even a grain of love and
    compassion in that relationship, not the slightest touch of personal
    fulfillment even. It is but a transaction made solely for money. Flesh
    trade! The man who comes for the satisfaction of carnel of his desire
    is never prepared to take up the responsibility that may accrue from it.
    He has no obligation towards her. She is only an animal destined to
    satisfy his sexul appetite. Each one of her relationships will serve only
    to immerse her even deeper into the mire that is the inhumanity of
    prostitution. Even the very dream of freedom is alien to her. She is one
    doomed to embrace the loneliness of orphanhood when in a diseased
    state, with her skin wrinkled and faded, she ends up being the object
    of nobody’s concern.
    What, then, of the tradition which lays open, before the slave,
    the very door to freedom? And what of the rottings system which
    drives the woman from one dependence to the other? Any comparison,
    whatsoever, between these two is impossible because they stand at
    two opposing and extreme poles. One recognized by benign humanism,
    the other which leads to depredation and frustration.

    • Mubarak says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 11:16 am

      How do you qualify as a slave owner in Islam, sham?

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 1:00 pm

      Sham summary: Islamic slavery good, prostitution bad… which makes this whore for Islam, Sham, very bad indeed (skin wrinkled and faded, the object of nobody’s concern). What a lame, disgusting attempt to defend the sex slavery of women as doing them a favor.

      Kaffir women are part of the “wealth” allowable for Muslims to take in absence of dhimmi pact or (temporary peace treaty), or more starkly as expressed by Muhammad:
      “I have been ordered to fight/kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. IF THEY DO THAT, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights of Islam. Their reckoning will be with Allah.”

      But, as we know, women are a man’s property in Islam even in marriage. Muslim women.
      “When a woman marries, she sells a part of her person. In the market one buys merchandise, in marriage the husband buys the genital arvum mulieris. As in any other bargain and sale, only useful and ritually clean objects may be given in dower.”
      Ruxton (1916: 106). Quoted by Ziba Mir-Hosseini in volume five of Voices of Islam, pp. 85-113

      In Islam, the nearest equivalent to (the term) marriage is the nikah, a contract between a male and a female Muslim. Nikah literally means “sexual intercourse”, hence an Islamic marriage is a “contract of coitus”. Clear enough? In Islam when a man marries a wife he buys her sexual organs for his use.

      And the fact remains Islam sanctions the rape of captives and owned slaves (in addition to forced sex with wives).

      “Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you.” (Qur’an 4:24) Explained:

      “Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2:2150)

      “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty.” (Qur’an 33:50)

      “Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married…Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.”
      —-“Ruling on having intercourse with a slave woman when one has a wife” Islam Q&A Fatwa 10382

      From Ali Sina, on the misogyny of Islam:

      “Muhammad said women were like domestic animals (in his last sermon). {Which explains this commentary from the scholar Hadi Sabzevari (1797-1873)}: “women, due to the deficiency in their intelligence and understanding of intricacies, and due to their fondness for the adornments of the world, are truly and justly among the mute animals. They have the nature of beasts, but they have been given the disguise of human beings so that men would not be loathe to talk to them and be compelled to have sexual intercourse with them. That is why our immaculate Law takes men’s side and gives them superiority in most matters, including divorce.”

      Several hadiths report that Muhammad and his companions beat their wives.
      “Umar narrated, “The Prophet said ‘a man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.”
      (Dawud 11:2142)

      Contrary to what Muslims claim, Islam did not improve the status of women in Arabia. It actually took everything they had and denigrated them to such an extent that Aisha complained “Do you make us (women) equal to dogs and donkeys?” (Bukhari 1:9:486)

      Khadijah, Muhammad’s first wife, had a business of her own and had men at her service. Muhammad was but one of her employees. Do we have any tale of women after Islam, running their own business and having men to work for them? For Muhammad women were nothing more than sex objects.”

      http://pamelageller.com/2014/08/ali-sina-women-islam-muhammad-misogynist.html/

    • Cecilia Ellis says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 1:45 pm

      PLAGIARISM ALERT:

      Sham, your article — presented in two separate posts — is 100% plagiarized . . . as usual.

      http://www.nicheoftruthonline.com/criticism.php?criticismId=56

      Why do you insist on breaking the law and posting articles here as though they are your own? Do you really think we are unaware of your thievery? How about just adding quotations at the beginning and end of the articles you steal from Niche in Truth or Answering Christianity? At least by adding quotation marks, you will have contributed something original to the article.

    • kangi_nunpa says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 4:54 pm

      Omnishambles: Your plagiarized ramblings are transparent. Your attempts to defend the hideous “morality” of Islam are as hollow as the “morality” itself.
      As many others have noted, anything good in Islam was brought by previous faiths/people; the rest is a hideous system of oppression, murder and slavery.

      Your attempts to convert those whose eyes are open, i.e., JWers, are useless and serve only to show the moral bankruptcy and idiocy of moslems and their “religion.”

      • Karen says

        Aug 1, 2016 at 2:29 pm

        Omnishambles..love it!

        Yes, Ramblers rather lame and circular arguments fell into complete shambles.

  21. biff says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:32 am

    Charge him with hate crimes and get him the fuck out of the country.

  22. Westman says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 10:42 am

    I get confused about adultery in Islam.

    If a nation or entity is “warring” against Muslims its women may be taken as sex slaves or raped – check.

    A married Muslim man may do this without his wife’s consent and it is not adulterous – check.

    If a married Muslim man has consentual sex with another Muslim woman he has committed adultery and must be punished – check.

    Now I get it! The only possible conclusion – Infidel women have no rights or value under Islam and any manner of abuse toward them by Muslims is sanctioned by Islamic Ideology. The recent “Taharrush gama’ei” incidents come to mind.

  23. Singh the Sikh says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 11:50 am

    One for Mubarak to pyschoanalyze. Easy one to justify: this Muslim holy man was only following da ample set by his holy prophet.

    Afghan cleric, 60, arrested after marrying 6-year-old girl given as a ‘religious offering’
    By Fiona Keating
    July 30, 2016 17:28
    A 6-year-old girl was married to an Afghan religious leader. (Representative image)Darren Whiteside/ Reuters
    A respected cleric was arrested in Afghanistan after allegedly marrying a 6-year-old girl. Mohammad Karim claimed that the child was offered to him as a gift and that her parents had full knowledge of the marriage. But when the child was interviewed by police she said: “I am afraid of this man.”

    The 60-year-old Muslim holy man from the Ghor province in Afghanistan claims the girl was a “religious offering”. He added: “The girl was given to me as a gift and we were married so I could raise her.”

  24. Mong says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    This is why we should fight those who believe in Allah and let them find in us hardness. Oh sorry, is that too much?

    • Klaas says

      Jul 31, 2016 at 3:37 pm

      Yes, too harsh, you islamophobe! The quran is a one-way street.

  25. mike ryan says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 2:14 pm

    It is more than telling that the Express-ionless closes the comments section on most things relating to Islam.

    We must NOT argue with those who would fill us with novacain in face of Islam’s aggression. No. No. No.

  26. Jon Weiss says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 6:11 pm

    UK: Muslim cleric tells Muslims that taking sex slaves is “permissible in Islam”

    And therein is another example of why Islam is not consistent with U.S. Law.

    13th Amendment:
    Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

    Take Islam and Sharia elsewhere, not here.

  27. islam the religion of killers says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 8:03 pm

    Export, Export, Export, this should be the minium standard, the Imam AND HIS FAMILY should all be dumped back in Palestine, no questions, no reprive, no “is the will of Alla” just out ..

    This is no different than saying I’m some kind of religious guru, therefore I have the right to subjugate woman, and rape at will …

  28. Lucretius says

    Jul 31, 2016 at 9:10 pm

    Ugh, maintaining taquiyya all the time can be such a chore! Cut Allah’s slave some slack now, we can’t all have the stamina of Muhammad. We all have our personal jihad, and this is his. What’s yours?

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • James Lincoln on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Carol on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • James Lincoln on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Jayme on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.