• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Australia police: “No radicalization” in Muslim who stabbed woman while screaming “Allahu akbar”

Aug 25, 2016 8:43 am By Robert Spencer

The official denial of jihad just keeps getting more ridiculous. Whenever a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” kills someone, we are told that it was because of some other reason, nothing whatsoever to do with jihad or Islam. Often lately we hear that jihadis were mentally ill.

In this case, it was unrequited love, a romance gone bad for poor Smail Ayad, although “certainly from Mia’s point of view” there was no “romantic connection.”

Well, that’s a shame. The broken-hearted are indeed many, and some do resort, in their rage and shame and frustration, to physical attacks against those who have rejected them. The difference here is that Smail Ayad screamed “Allahu akbar” while murdering Mia Ayliffe-Chung. Up to the point he did this, he may have been a “moderate.” He may not have had an Islamic State or al-Qaeda membership card in his wallet. He may, in other words, have shown no signs of “radicalization.”

What he did show signs of, however, was a tendency among Muslims to react with a murderous rage that they associate with religious fervor when they are denied, frustrated, rejected. Is it really wise for Australia or any other country to import large numbers of people who believe that Allah will punish Infidels by their hands (cf. Qur’an 9:14) and that therefore, if they believe an Infidel has wronged them, may decide to become executors of the divine wrath?

Smail-Ayad

An update on this story. “Australia Police: No Extremist Motive Found in Hostel Attack,” by Kristen Gelineau, Associated Press, August 25, 2016:

Australian police were investigating whether a French man accused of fatally stabbing a British woman while shouting the Arabic phrase “Allahu akbar” had a romantic obsession with her, an official said Thursday.

Police in Queensland state said there was no indication the attack at a northeast Australian hostel was motivated by extremism. But they are looking into whether the suspect, 29-year-old Smail Ayad, had been rejected by 21-year-old Mia Ayliffe-Chung before police say he stabbed her to death on Tuesday, Queensland Police Detective Superintendent Ray Rohweder said.

“That is one of the lines of inquiry that we are conducting. There is certainly, at this stage, no indication that — certainly from Mia’s point of view — that there was any sort of romantic connection,” Rohweder told reporters.

Though police said Ayad shouted “Allahu akbar” — the Arabic phrase meaning “God is great” — both during the attack and while being arrested, there was no evidence he had been motivated by any extremist ideology, Rohweder said.

“There is absolutely no indication of any form of radicalization or any political motive in this matter,” he said.

The attack took place Tuesday night in front of dozens of backpackers at a hostel in the town of Home Hill, south of Townsville in northern Queensland. Ayliffe-Chung was found dead at the scene and a 30-year-old British man who tried to stop the attack was seriously wounded. He was in critical condition with injuries to his head. A dog was also killed in the attack.

Ayad was charged on Thursday with one count of murder, two counts of attempted murder, one count of serious animal cruelty and 12 counts of serious assault. He is due to appear in court on Friday.

Witnesses told police Ayad had been acting out of character in the hours leading up to the attack. Police believe he had consumed cannabis during the evening, but there was no evidence he had been drinking or taking harder drugs, Rohweder said.

While transporting Ayad from a hospital to the police station in Townsville on Wednesday, Ayad became “extremely violent,” forcing police to stop the vehicle to restrain him, Rohweder said. The detectives received cuts and abrasions and a bite to the leg during the scuffle, and had to use a taser and pepper spray to subdue him.

Ayad was given a psychiatric assessment, but Rohweder declined to release the results….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Australia, Featured, Jihad in the West, willful ignorance Tagged With: Allahu akbar, Mya Ayliffe-Chung, Smail Ayad


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Moses says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 8:46 am

    BLIND to the evils of ISLAM yet again.When will they learn.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 11:39 am

      Even if it were true that Islam and its hateful narcissistic teachings did not give this man a special feeling of entitlement, as revealed in his calling out Allahu Akbar during the attack and later when arrested, his assumption is surely that so called “moderate” Muslims around will feel a special kinship to him by him calling out Allahu Akbar.

      In some ways that is even more revealing of (Islam’s disgrace).

    • Mr John says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 5:25 am

      Maybe that guy has always been a radical retard, no need to get radicalized.

    • J D S says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 10:09 pm

      We need to go back to public hangings….just keept the kids away…. but let it be known that one will be hung if one murders epecislly jihadist screminng allahu ackbar.

  2. gretel says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 8:56 am

    When a man is taught all his life that he is the supreme gender, and that women have little value, and you add to that he believes he is superior to every non moslem, it is likely infuriating for him when someone, especially a woman doesn’t respond the way they expect or want them to.

    BTW, when you hear someone praising allah, “run or duck”.

    • Diimaa says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 4:56 pm

      BTW, when you hear someone praising allah, “run or duck”.

      Symptom of the decline of the West. Get your gun or knife ready and wait for him .
      You fat coward!

    • Vlad says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 6:24 pm

      Nah, fight. Put in the boots and don’t stop until there is no more movement.

    • J-A palmaer says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 8:06 am

      Well, actually “true religion” and “truly religious people” get less and less aggressive. Being “furious” and being “religious” are actually telling us that this “anger” is only a sign of being “non-religious”. I believe the pressure on “Muslims” when it comes to “loyalty” to their book, and their prophet, is the complete fear of “blasphemy” – “blasphemy-phobia”…

  3. Michael Laudahn says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 8:57 am

    Hahaha. Who was it here who tried to explain me a few months ago that Australia were different because it’s a rugby nation? Oz is a pc nation, and that is all that counts. I think even Mark Steyn has comprehended me, now that I have told him a few times (‘America alone’). At least I haven’t heard from him a lot recently. .)

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 10:35 am

      Why, exactly, are you gloating over Australia and the US being as riddled with suicidal “political correctness” as every other part of the West? If this isn’t ‘unclear on the concept’, I don’t know what is.

      As for Mark Steyn, that staunch Anti-Jihadist has sadly noted that things have changed for the worse in the US post-Obama–I very much doubt your pestering emails led him to that conclusion. But no–he is still fighting the good fight, unlike some people here.

      That anyone here would gloat over more of the West falling victim to ravening Muslims is no Anti-Jihadist, but is making common cause with our enemies, whether that is his avowed intention or not.

      • Michael Laudahn says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 11:08 am

        Good question, that I have asked myself earlier. I haven’t really reached a result – except maybe that it shows again (at least according to my logic) that any man with common sense and without all the formal education can reach the right insight faily early and easily? So is it some kind of revenge for having been ridiculed by well-educated individuals who are now being proven wrong, while I on my own have been right very early on? .)

        • Western Canadian says

          Aug 27, 2016 at 10:17 pm

          “Highly educated” and “well educated” are not the same thing. And it takes no education to become aware of that, and aware of it very quickly.

      • linnte says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 11:18 am

        OT; Graven, was it you who advised me to get those pamphlets about Shari’a Law and hand them out? I ordered enough for interested friends, and one for every church here in my little town. Taking them to the churches will open the door for me to discuss Islam and the potential for refugees and the harm they may do. Thanks so much for your encouragement! DOING something feels so good.

        And as for anyone gloating over the threat of Islam in the West? My grandkids will end up fighting this cause if we don’t fix it now. So fix it we MUST.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 27, 2016 at 10:27 pm

          Good for you, Linnte. While almost everyone in the West is opposed to violent Jihad, there are many who have no understanding about what Shari’ah law really is.

    • SpiritOf1683 says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 1:20 am

      Unfortunately, this is living proof of Australia being as politically correct as most of the rest of the West, plus that stupid Pope. And this is nothing to gloat about, ecause peoplwe are payin g a terrible price for it now, and that price will get even bigger as this century rolls on. We’re now 15 years on from 9/11 and our grovelling to these savages has got far worse, despite what we’ve seen over these last two years alone from charlie Hebdo onwards through Paris, Brussels, Orlando, that priest getting murdered in France and now this poor beautiful girl in Australia. How much more of this must we be forced to put up with? Must we have another 10 9/11s, 500 Bataclans, 1,000 Orlandos and 100,000 like this poor girl or that poor priest , and 1,000,000-plus rapes like in Cologne before the penny finally drops? Or will we retreat further in our PC shell with the same defence of Islam, more teddy bears, more scented candles and more of our so-called leaders walking arm in arm in the usual false display of solidarity with one another. You can bet the Chinese wouldn’t tolerate any of this.

      • Greyhound Fancier says

        Aug 27, 2016 at 12:05 am

        We’re always bringing teddy bears to a knife and gun fight. It just looks so weak and ineffective. Did anyone do that during any previous war?

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 27, 2016 at 1:13 am

          I think most of the world did before WWII. They watched Japan, Italy and Germany invade independent countries and did nothing. They were so concerned with the death of about 10 million people that they walked into the killing of more or less 70 million in WWII. They wrung their hands, fretted and worried, allowing diplomats to blow smoke, and burn up time and money, while delaying the development and production of weapons that could demonstrate both resolve to fight and the will to use them.

          Thank God for insightful diplomats such as John Bolton. They are the rare exception among a rule of pure gutless bull____. Once the ordinary diplomat admits inability to “make a deal” he is out of a job. He is more concerned with keeping his job than he is protecting our lives or liberty. Check out the UN Small Arms Treaty which has been signed by the current administration, and enforced in the US without being ratified, and which severely endangers (substantially destroys) the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding US citizens, which rights are already generally gone to others.

          China and Russia are spending billions on new weapons. We are spending Trillions on handouts. We are spending more or less a Trillion dollars for an airplane that has been totally compromised and improved by the Chinese copy now flying to overcome its design weaknesses. Those weaknesses in the US version are so significant that the original requirements had to be adjusted DOWN to allow it to pass. I label this airplane a flying coffin for all the US and allied pilots who will fly it. For a historical example of a compromised airplane design take a look at MiG 25 Pilot, co-written by a pilot who flew a MiG 25 to Japan for US inspection.

          Then we have other countries, which do not reflect any Western reason or values, producing nuclear weapons, and looking forward to the end of the world so the expected one can come and take over. What makes anyone believe that uranium mined, refined and enriched in Iran can’t be taken to North Korea for further enrichment and construction into bombs? It takes a sphere of 90+% pure U-235 (about 10 kilograms) about the size of a softball to make a bomb. Why imagine that Iran needs to wait to attack the US and Europe with nuclear missiles because they don’t have an ICBM, that we know about? They can use missiles they already have, and have tested, then strap some solid fuel rockets from their existing surface to air missiles to help them get the additional speed for longer range and take them to friendly bases in Venezuela or on board ships. Iran has be rehearsing launching large liquid fueled missiles from ships for about a decade. Of course, North Korea has missiles with range enough when fired from Iran to reach any part of Europe. With the loss of sanctions, Iranian ships will almost certainly free to load and transport any cargo to North Korea and back.

          A fact that was revealed about 60 years ago that is not frequently discussed now: The US produced 2 distinctly different bombs for Japan. (The book Fat Man and Little Boy). The first used on Hiroshima was an enriched uranium bomb. That design was considered so predictable and reliable that it was never tested before being dropped, conserving the precious enriched uranium. The second using plutonium, which is “cooked” from uranium in nuclear reactors, was not considered reliable until it was tested in New Mexico. Iran is producing enriched uranium in approximately 19,000 centrifuges right now.

          Here’s the point. The smallest, easiest to deliver nuclear weapons are generally uranium bombs. One design is little more than a piece of pipe that fits in an ordinary brief case. You can see for yourself at the Atomic Bomb Museum in Albuquerque. Our current administration along with the other traitorous administrations of the EU that were involved in the recent “nuclear deal” with Iran have totally empowered North Korea and Iran to make and use all the nuclear weapons they wish.

          When you add in the ongoing deliberate, willful deception of all citizens and subjects concerning the teachings, practice and goals of Islam, our leaders aiding, abetting, counselling and acting in furtherance of war crimes extending 1400 years in the past and into the future as long as the “followers” like us fail to understand the leaders are knowingly lying about the truth, we are being drowned in lies, for which the solution is to vote them out while we can. If we don’t our whole western society will end in disaster much as Nazi Germany. The big difference will be that all of us and our children and their children and all the generations who will never be born will die, because there will be no Marshall Plan to aid our rebuilding after the coming Muslim conquest. “If Islam was such a great deal why were 4,000,000 Egyptians murdered to bring it?” Mark Gabriel, Ph.D. The Unfinished Battle. People are still being murdered in Egypt by Muslims today. (“An armed person is a citizen; An unarmed person is a subject.”). What is your preference?

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 27, 2016 at 10:29 pm

          Frank, you are right that it took a long time for people in the free West to wake up to the Fascist threat before WWII.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 28, 2016 at 11:30 am

          Thank you.

          And history is being repeated by a real bunch of geniuses that we allow to control. To see a good example of their goal for us, watch the movie Logan’s Run. It clearly illustrates the socialist ideal. Remember that none other than the revered and often mentioned George Bernard Shaw stood in front of a camera, which film is still available, and said that we should be required every 5 years or so to stand in front of a committee and explain why we should be allowed to live. If we can’t to the satisfaction of the committee scientists should develop a quick, painless poison gas to put us out of our misery. Individuals do not matter to socialists.

          National Socialists found close and agreeable alliance with Muslims through the Grand Mufti, Yasser Arafat’s relative, and continued after WWII through Hitler’s problem solving killer, Otto Skorzeny. When you see a formation of Hezbollah (The Party of God) marching, notice that their left hands are frequently holding their belt buckles just as the SS did in their filmed marching. “When the number of cradles exceed the number of coffins our future is assured.” Heinrich Himmler regarding the “lebensborn” project (subject to correction).

          The truth of Jorge Santayana’s statement, “Those who cannot remember the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them,” marches on. The Life of Reason (1905). We need, following good Catholic teaching, to light a lot of candles in a dark world.

  4. Frank Anderson says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:01 am

    “There is none so blind as those who refuse to see.”

  5. Pastorius says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:02 am

    “No Radicalization”.

    That would make sense, because this is true Islam.

    They’re getting warmer.

  6. Adrian says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:03 am

    This is now the new “literal-minded” obfuscation:

    If a Communist killed a capitalist and yelled “Viva Karl Marx”, but did not have a Communist Party membership card in his pocket, then this would have nothing to do with Communism, right?

    This “radicalization” excuse is becoming more and more pervasive…

    • PRCS says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 10:42 am

      As the “radicalization” meme is manufactured nonsense, it’s not an excuse.

      It’s just a lie; the kind of nonsense our fellow citizens have been subjected to, for so long that they’ve come to believe is true.

  7. Jaladhi says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 am

    Of course , there was no radicalization, he was only following his religion telling him to kill infidels. Muslims will keep on killing and the Westerners will keep debating motive or radicalization as if that matters. Being a Muslim is sufficient to explain his murderous attack. Muslims keep laughing at the West – they couldn’t find a better enemy to defeat.

    • Vlad says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 6:40 pm

      Of course the police spokesman had it right.
      None of the Muslimes is “radicalised”. There is NO SUCH THING AS RADICAL MUSLIMES.
      Just watch this youtube clip below.

  8. Infidel lives matter says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:17 am

    Had the dog rejected him too?

    • Michael Casmer says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 10:46 am

      Oh no! Where are the animal lovers on this one? If a man kills a lion in a reserve women protest. Where are the protestors over this one?

    • Schrödinger says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 2:36 pm

      Yes, the dog probably rejected him as well. Who can blame it?

      Likewise, regarding the legitimate response to muslims and their jihad in general – how much can a Koala bear?

  9. Foolscan'tfool says says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:19 am

    We often hear from muslims “I am a muslim first, secondly I am Australian” (or whatever country they are residing in). Then, accordingly, why don’t the reporters identify this murderer as a muslim first rather than a French national? ….Mental illness?? This type of mental illness can only be treated at a rifle range.

  10. Adrian says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:20 am

    Why did he need “radicalization” if he already was a devoted Muslim?

    • PRCS says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 10:47 am

      Exactly.

      He doesn’t–because he knows it’s nonsense.

      The media doesn’t, apparently.

  11. kessler says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:24 am

    This denial is getting sickening. At first this sheer stupidity was quite amusing, but one would hope the truth would prevail after these kind of attacks have become more or less a daily occurrence. No luck. The denial is in full swing and politicians, the media, muslims and their leftist ilk are doing a tremendous job peddling this fallacy.
    Problem here is that “extremism” is defined as belonging to a jihadi group such as ISIS. They found no link, hence the “lack of motive”. Had people been willing to accept the fact that extremism comes in many forms and are all rooted in Islamic theology, they would have had a motive right there.
    You don’t have to officially pledge allegiance to a ISIS to be “extreme” – if you accept the hatred towards infidels mandated in the Qur’an and willing to shed blood for Allah, you are “extreme”. If you believe Islamic law should trump Western democracy you are “extreme” – you don’t even have to commit violence – this includes every single Muslim who believes that their prophet should be granted immunity to satire an criticism. Their Jihad is mostly non-violent, but the end goal is that of the violent Jihadists.
    Such an staggering amount of idiocy and wilful ignorance

    • PRCS says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 11:00 am

      Yes.

      But, hard to tell if the denials are being perpetuated by the ignorant or the deceitful.

      Muslim groups knowingly make them.

      Some other groups make them out of ignorance.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 11:57 am

      I agree with your comment. Please let me suggest reading an excerpt of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. The whole book in the current edition is about a thousand pages. The part (about 200 pages of 1000) I ask you to read starts at the end of WWI and continues through January 30, 1933, when Hitler was given the Chancellor’s office. To me it is a lot like following today’s news. Then, if you have the time, please continue reading to observe the narcissistic Neville Chamberlain and his “Peace at any price” mantra that was a direct copy of Lenin in Russia when they surrendered to Germany in WWi. Chamberlain, like our current leadership in the US, EU, Australia and Canada was absolutely convinced of his great charm and wisdom; and refused to believe what Hitler had written, spoken and practiced, until it was too late. Mohammed wrote what he did, the perfect, final, unchangeable statement, 1400 years ago. It has been practiced all that time while almost certainly more than 100 million people, “apostate” Muslims and Infidels have been slaughtered at Muslim hands. “If Islam was such a great deal, why were 4,000,000 Egyptians killed to bring it to Egypt?” The Unfinished Battle, Mark Gabriel, Ph.D.

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 6:46 am

        The death toll for infidels at the hands of Muslims is at least 300 million. And it would have been many more had infidels, especially the likes of Charles martel, jan Sobieski not fought back. And the Mongol hordes did become a barrier to islamic expansion into the Far East.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 26, 2016 at 10:53 am

          I am certain that I, and believe that all others, welcome more correct information. Thank you.

  12. biff says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:25 am

    He did not need to be radicalized. He’s already a Muslim.

    That’s defacto Radicalized.

  13. Peter says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:34 am

    Conclusion: belief in Islam represents a form of mental illness, maybe Islamitis.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 12:12 pm

      With respect, if it does then there is nothing in the Western legal system that can be done. An insane person cannot even be tried, much less convicted. And they know it. More than 1 comment has been posted recently on JW stories explaining, almost certainly by writers with better credentials than mine, that Nazi’s fervently believed their murders were justified. Especially when they were loaded on crystal meth, which turned them into mindless and remorseless killers, they killed multi-millions without concern. (Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to criminal charges.) Did this make them legally insane and therefore not responsible for their crimes? To call these terrorists insane is to excuse murder as directed by the standard, orthodox, not radical teachings of a 1400 year old book authored by a lying, murdering pedophile. The best book to read for a concise but thorough introduction and explanation is Robert Spencer’s Politically Correct Guide to Islam and the Crusades. It is a masterpiece of brevity, good writing and easy reading.

      • Peter says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 12:23 pm

        You’re preaching to the choir.
        By the way, the SS saw it as its duty to exterminate the Jews; rather similar to the divine Islamic mandate to subjugate, enslave, or exterminate all non-Muslims and extirpate “their systems of belief.”

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 25, 2016 at 12:34 pm

          It was not only the SS, but every part of the Nazi regime, including the Wehrmacht that aided, abetted, counseled and acting in furtherance of the slaughter of “untermensch” (subhumans including Jews, Slavs, and many others). Spend some time watching Amercia’s Heroes Channel to see for yourself.

      • Carol says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 4:03 pm

        If the person is found guilty in a court of law, the label should read “guilty but insane”, not “innocent by reason of insanity”. That way, he will receive mental health treatment while in prison. He will still have to serve time or pay for his crimes. I don’t know Australian law, But I hope it is tough!

        This guy looks to be extremely violent and shouldn’t be on the streets

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 25, 2016 at 8:54 pm

          If we were addressing a simple criminal insanity issue that is totally isolated to a single person, I think you are correct. But this is the exercise of war against any and all infidels, including “apostates” that was declared 1400 years ago and continues as long as we make excuses for the killers. They want to die in service to their teachings so that they will receive the great rewards in the hereafter. Do you want to die in order to help them receive their rewards? How many of your friends and neighbors, or even total strangers do you want to see killed in order for these murders to take place so the killers can earn their rewards? Please read some books and get a better understanding. Making excuses and minimizing the atrocities of these societal killers enables them to continue their war.

        • SpiritOf1683 says

          Aug 26, 2016 at 1:24 am

          The only mental health treatment he should have received was a bullet through the brain on the spot. That would have happened had this heinous murder taken place in China.

  14. Angry Aussie says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 9:39 am

    This infuriates me no end. I believe it was an honour killing. He apparently was telling everyone at the hostel that they were in love and married. She rejected his advances. She was in bed and asleep when he attacked. He had apparently learned prior that she had modeled in her underwear for a magazine. Clear case of Islamic slaughter to me.

    • SpiritOf1683 says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 6:49 am

      This was the murder of an infidel who didn’t want him first and foremost. You Aussies will be footing the bill to lock him up for 50 or more years because the police didn’t have the cojones to gun him down, despite him injuring twelve of them.

  15. Richard says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:15 am

    They are right, This is mainstream Islam.

    • Blangwort says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 10:19 pm

      I was going to say the same thing. This is mainstream Islam. This is okay. They do this all the time. We just have to show tolerance because this is what they believe.

      I’m only being sarcastic about the latter.

  16. ploome says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:17 am

    heh

    no radicalization? correct

    plain everyday islam

  17. Cy Halothrin says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:21 am

    “Australian police were investigating whether a French man accused of fatally stabbing a British woman while shouting the Arabic phrase “Allahu akbar” had a romantic obsession with her…”

    I guess “romantic obsession” is politically correct code for “rape.”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the jihadi also wanted to rape the dog. Usually these guys prefer a goat or a camel, but I guess one wasn’t available at the time so poor Mr Ayad had to improvise.

    • Greyhound Fancier says

      Aug 27, 2016 at 12:14 am

      A “French” man fatally stabbing a British woman? He certainly didn’t behave like a typical French man! Must be MDS [Muslim Derangement Syndrome]. There appears to be no cure, and this illness can erupt with little or no warning.

  18. gravenimage says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:23 am

    Australia police: “No radicalization” in Muslim who stabbed woman while screaming “Allahu akbar”
    ………………………….

    Well, they’re right–but not in the way that they mean. There is nothing “radical” about a Muslim attacking and murdering Infidels.

    More:

    In this case, it was unrequited love, a romance gone bad for poor Smail Ayad, although “certainly from Mia’s point of view” there was no “romantic connection.”
    ………………………….

    Actually, Australian police are just “one of the lines of inquiry” they are investigating.

    It may have been a “random” attack on an Infidel, or Ms. Ayliffe-Chung may indeed have rejected his overtures.

    But this also has a disturbing aspect: in Islam, no Infidel is allowed to reject a Muslim’s sexual interest, whether he wants to “marry” her, or just molest and rape her.

    More:

    Though police said Ayad shouted “Allahu akbar” — the Arabic phrase meaning “God is great” — both during the attack and while being arrested, there was no evidence he had been motivated by any extremist ideology, Rohweder said.
    ………………………….

    What fools these dhimmis be!

    More:

    Ayliffe-Chung was found dead at the scene and a 30-year-old British man who tried to stop the attack was seriously wounded. He was in critical condition with injuries to his head. A dog was also killed in the attack.
    ………………………….

    No, the dog wasn’t “killed in the attack”–the Muslim also killed the poor dog.

    Kudos to this brave British man–and *actual* Briton, as Smail Ayad was *not* an actual Frenchman–who tried to save this poor woman. I hope he recovers.

  19. Lynne says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:36 am

    What’s wrong with these people who won’t see Islam as a hate-filled religion and political ideology? Governments are cowardly and the police are forced to go easy on these criminals.

  20. Richard says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 10:53 am

    Stabbing of woman, by Muslim, while screaming “Allahu akbar” was due to “unrequited love”.

    So that’s what it was. Muslim love. All those rapes and massacres in Europe – they were just feeling the love.

    I guess she, the dog and the injured felt the love and their families should be grateful.

  21. Aron says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 11:22 am

    Earlier reports clearly stated Many eye witnesses say about this man -that ” He was saying to us he was going to kill all of you”:and many times.

    Was he in unrequited love with all of them?

    What a pathological stupidity!

    “Backpackers at the hostel, which is popular with French and British tourists, told The Australian through friends that the Frenchman’s demeanour had changed on the night of the attack. “Everybody has told us he was completely crazy, they couldn’t recognise him,” a French tourist said. “He said he wants to kill everybody …. maybe there is ­alcohol and drugs involved.

    Queensland Police Service Deputy Commissioner Steve Gollschewski yesterday confirmed the Frenchman had yelled “Allahu Akbar” both during his alleged attack on Ms Ayliffe-Chung and following his arrest. Police officers captured the man shouting “Allahu Akbar” on body-worn cameras. “While this information will be factored into the investigation we are not ruling out any motivations at this stage, whether they be political or criminal,” Mr Gollschewski said.”

    Mohamad, koran and ISIS are least likely to be involved…we get it.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 2:56 pm

      Aron wrote:

      Earlier reports clearly stated Many eye witnesses say about this man -that ” He was saying to us he was going to kill all of you”:and many times.

      Was he in unrequited love with all of them?
      ………………………

      Yes–this is absurd.

  22. linnte says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 11:34 am

    Will some Australian here consider giving a copy or forty of the Qur’an to local Police Chiefs? I guarantee once those Qur’an are read, the police will have no other option than to call a murder like this for what it is. Muhammad said he “had overcome by terror” (para,)and the man who did this killing knew full well the outcome of his actions. “Moderate” Muslims always wonder why we have a case of islamophobia! (sarc). This girl, on holiday, killed by a Muslim in a most horrifying way. What were the odds? Islam must be eradicated. And soon!

    • PRCS says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 1:22 pm

      Providing a copy to each of them will likely just be an expensive gesture, as there’s no reason to believe they’ll read it.

      • Frank Anderson says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 pm

        If they did read it what would make any of us think they would believe it, or that their “superiors” would allow them to act differently?

        Remember the defense of superior orders (“I was acting under orders.”) was abrogated, eliminated by the Treaty of London in 1945. That treaty which created the United Nations also empowered the war crimes trials in Nuremberg and elsewhere ever since. Every person from the “top” on down is personally responsible for his failures regardless of the endangered position he may have suffered when making a decision to obey the law or his “superior”. Aiding and abetting crimes against humanity is a war crime. These deniers are aiding and abetting terrorists by their willful and deliberate ignorance. “Deliberate ignorance constitutes knowledge of the truth.” Wyle v. R.J. Reunolds, 709 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1983).

        The London treaty is controlling law to every country that joined the United Nations by among other things ratifying and adopting the treaty’s terms. Sooner or later these “deniers” could face war crimes prosecution. The sooner the better.

        • Champ says

          Aug 25, 2016 at 2:25 pm

          Frank, thank you for your comment, and I’m greatly enjoying all of your contributions.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 25, 2016 at 4:36 pm

          Every good deed is AT Least 3: A good deed for the person who receives it; A good deed for the person who does it; And a good deed to the Glory of God who makes all things possible. My addition to Jewish teaching.

        • Champ says

          Aug 25, 2016 at 4:44 pm

          So true, Frank! …I like that 🙂

        • PRCS says

          Aug 26, 2016 at 9:09 am

          Thank you, Frank, and with that, I’m afraid, a very real reason for them to intentionally stash it somewhere out of sight.

          Making the provision of a copy to each law enforcement agency, or lawmaker, but an expensive, well-intended gesture, I believe.

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 1:39 am

        To ciut the chase, just give them the whole of Sura 9.

  23. DP111 says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 11:36 am

    This attack on a Chinese girl by an Algerian Muslim, is not too far from the ongoing attacks on Chinese in Paris by Algerians/Muslims..

    I believe there is going to be greater number of attacks, on Sikhs, Hindus, and Chinese, by the Religion of “Mental Health issues” (current New Truth), all over the world.

    The reason is that both China and India are not being tolerant to attacks by Muslim Jihadis, as they are required to by allah. Quite the contrary. France is also not as tolerant as before. Therefore, more attacks on France.

    It wont surprise me that the Malaysia plane MH370 was deliberately destroyed, as most of the passengers were Chinese.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 7:03 pm

      This young woman, born and raised in the UK, was, so far as I can determine, Eurasian by ancestry: her father ethnically Chinese, her mother English (hence the hyphenated surname – Ayliffe-Chung.

      Murdered by a Muslim who should never have been admitted into Australia, she represents *both* the non-Muslim West *and* the non-Muslim East, both of which the Ummah has been attacking continuously (slacking off only when encountering determined armed resistance) for 1400 years.

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 1:37 am

        That Muslim should never have been anywhere in the West, let alone Australia. His ancestral hiome was North Africa, and letting millions of these into Europe and now North America and Australia is making things increasingly miserabnle for the rest of us. God help our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren 50 years from now.

  24. Angemon says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 11:38 am

    “There is absolutely no indication of any form of radicalization or any political motive in this matter,” he said.

    That’s it. Time to undergo reformation or burn everything to the ground and start anew.

  25. Michael Johnson says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 12:11 pm

    Why would it be a romance when in Islam he could just take her and rape her keep her as a sex slave for life no this is jihad at its best

    • PRCS says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 1:24 pm

      Oh, you silly man!

      He has to capture her in battle in order to keep her as a sex-slave.

      I mean, really, they do have rules, after all.

  26. Tim Irvin says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 2:02 pm

    The Westernized Muslim, who flits from one world to the other, thinks he can have his cake and eat it. He is a prince. He is allowed to sleep around with Western women, he drinks and takes drugs, but never questions his own culture which exists in a parallel idealised world. His sisters are the same age as the girls he covets, but they are not to be touched. We never question this double standard, and so at best he thinks we don’t care, at worst he think we are a bunch of whores who permit this treatment. I don’t doubt this guy was obsessed by this woman, and when he was rejected he felt the hot pride of shame, and lashed out. It is permitted violence in his world, and if you were to look at what happens in Islamic societies, specifically Arab societies – although Albania deserves an honourable mention – then casual violence caused by hurt pride is something like a norm. Your cousin refuses to marry you, even though she was promised to you? You have her killed. You wanted to start a family with her, but she rejected you, and so she deserves to die. Sometimes with the consent of her parents. This isn’t ISIS, this is mainstream Islam.

  27. My Opinion says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 2:44 pm

    Just doing what moslems do, no radicalization required.

    • biff says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 3:36 pm

      Allah Akbar has nothing to do with Islam.

      Islam has nothing to do with Islam.

      Nothing has anything to do with Islam.

      • My Opinion says

        Aug 25, 2016 at 4:58 pm

        Of course not…completely innocent!

  28. Rob says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 3:18 pm

    Rebuffed by love interest?
    Normal guys: ‘I’ll get some flowers’
    Muslims: ‘I’ll get a knife’

  29. Champ says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 3:50 pm

    Australia police: “No radicalization” in Muslim who stabbed woman while screaming “Allahu akbar”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    How many times have we heard this excuse? Too many to count!

    Hey only mohammedans shout “allah akbar”; a hallmark of a *devout* mohammedan …

    And you may also find this lesson useful:

  30. SpiritOf1683 says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 4:05 pm

    These Aussie police are spineless. They’d rather have risked this scumbag killing them that do the common sense thing and shoot him dead. Had I been one of those police officers, this piece of filth wouldn’t be walking the earth today.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 9:02 pm

      Considering the appeasing attitude of those in charge, if you did shoot, you would probably go to jail. How many times did Neville Chamberlain accept insult, humiliation and lies before he finally grew a backbone and gained eyesight to see what he had been denying for 6 years? Only after all the damage was done, with the combined might and resources of Czechoslovakia and Poland lost, did he finally accept that he was utterly delusional and declare war. By that time Germany was stronger and France was unprepared for modern warfare. How close are we to repeating that disaster for ourselves and our children?

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 5:38 am

        Germany had been preparing for war since 1934, whilst France and Britain turned a blind eye. Czechoslovakia and Poland were new or re-created countries, having been around for less than 20 years. France neglected its Armed Forces whilst Britain only started preparing for war in 1938, with the result that we were unfit to take on the Germans in battle in 1939 and 1940. That narrow strip of water saved Britain’s bacon back then.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Aug 26, 2016 at 10:47 am

          Of course we are discussing opinions. Czechoslovakia had spent millions on weapons and much to their regret fixed fortifications in the Sudetenland, which Neville Chamberlain GAVE without Czech presence, much less Czech agreement, to Hitler. Considering that
          1) Czech tanks and other weapons were a very helpful part of the German army while attacking Poland and France, after Hitler had time to adapt them more to his purposes, and repair or replace the vehicles destroyed while invading Poland, AND 2) That the miserably equipped, trained and prepared Poles still such damage to the German army in the invasion that the turn to the west was delayed from September to May, while the Brits worried about bombing “private property” military plants,
          3) Not to mention a clear German Generals’ plot to overthrow Hitler before Chamberlain displayed his greatness over the Sudetenland, I think a reasonable argument could be made had the gutless Brits in charge, along with the gutless French in charge, and the ridiculous Poles in charge stood together with the Czech’s Hitler’s War would have been very short and sweet. Like today, spread chaos, divide and conquer. Exploit weakness. Insult and discourage cowards. “Cowards die many times; The valiant taste of death but once.”

          Please do not confuse the gutless in charge with those in the fight. Remember the heroic and brave conduct of the French fighting rear-guard to hold the Germans while the Dunkirk evacuation took place. For all the jokes we tell about the French, these soldiers prove us wrong.

  31. Diimaa says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 4:54 pm

    White Folks ( Westerners) are the most cowardly bunch. I’m sorry if any fucker, Muslim or not, does this to a girl in the presence of myself and my friends, just a couple of them, he is gonna turn into a confetti.

    How is it that 30 people witness the brutal stabbing of a woman and not even 15 of those overpowered this douche and beat him to pulp? The West is so paralyzed by law that they wait for a cop or animal service if a snake is spotted in a neighborhood.

    Let me tell you a story, I like animals domestic and wild….and I witnessed all American male or female run away from raccoons as if they jump on them and shred them to bits. But any human over 4 ft tall and weighing over 100 pounds should have no fear of any animal that weighs no more than 40 pounds.

    When I sometimes feed these raccoons, Some big fat American men come to me and ask me why I wasn’t afraid of them; that they carry rabies blah blah. I tell them that I weigh roughly three times as much as them and I’m 6 ft tall so why on earth should I be afraid of them?

    Why are you people so cowardly?

    • My Opinion says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 5:09 pm

      Most of us aren’t. Can’t believe everything you hear about us or what you see on television, because, I can assure you, had this happened in front of anyone I know, the coward wouldn’t have been able to slither away.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 7:09 pm

      If you read the reports carefully you discover that the mohammedan appears to have sneaked up on this girl **in her room in the hostel** while she was ASLEEP and attacked her; by the time everyone else (in *their* rooms, or in the common areas) woke up to what was happening (it was *eleven o’clock at night*) – her dying screams, probably – and worked out where the screams were coming from, it was too late.

      One man – and the dog, which I assume was the ‘house dog’, not a pet, as the people in the hostel were a mixed bag of all nationalities, in Australia on temporary working visas, to pick fruit on the surrounding farms, and would not have been able to own a pet – *were* killed, presumably when they tackled the attacker.

      The attacker was a *trained kickboxer*. I doubt that any of the other people present had had intensive fight training.

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 1:30 am

        That is why when the cops came to arrest him, they should have turned their guns on him when he started lashing out. Savages like him belong six feet under where he can do no further harm. When he gets jailed, those prison officers will be scared witless to go anywhere near him. I wouldn’t be surprised if he takes some of them hostage and kills at least one of them before he finally gets shot dead by the police, like he should have been.

      • Ballantine1979 says

        Aug 26, 2016 at 1:38 pm

        “The attack took place Tuesday night in front of dozens of backpackers at a hostel in the town of Home Hill, south of Townsville in northern Queensland. Ayliffe-Chung was found dead at the scene”

        “a French man accused of fatally stabbing a British woman while shouting the Arabic phrase “Allahu akbar”…”

        I don’t trust the media anymore to give us the full story of these Muslims attacks. I’ll assume she was BEHEADED and that the police and media are lying on purpose about how she was killed just to protect Muslims. They did the same with the priest in France and with Lee Rigby in England etc.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 25, 2016 at 9:11 pm

      I think it’s because they have been brainwashed into cowardice. Now as to who is doing the brainwashing?????

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 27, 2016 at 11:01 pm

      Diimaa wrote:

      Why are you people so cowardly?
      ……………………..

      The 30-year-old Brit who was stabbed coming to the victim’s aid certainly wasn’t a coward.

  32. Gary Daniels says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 5:07 pm

    To western infidels, mental illness is a hollow plea……..after 1,400 years of inbreeding there is little doubt that most,if not all muslims are naturally mentally deficient or mentally ill.

  33. Mark A says

    Aug 25, 2016 at 7:08 pm

    Maybe the Australian police are technically correct when they say there is no evidence of “radicalization” in this case.

    This guy could simply be behaving in the manner advocated in the numerous Koran verses telling “the believers” to attack and kill “infidels.” In many interpretations of Islam, that is a mainstream position, not a “radical” one.

    • PRCS says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 9:43 am

      That it’s what Islam commands, demands and expects of Allah’s every slave is what they don’t what to admit.

  34. Brian Riley says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 2:46 am

    Smail Ayad ? Have they got his first name right. Perhaps they are in denial about his being a Muslim. Should nt it be Ismail, the name of a 9th century Muslim scholar, according to a Muslim boys name website

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 2:59 am

      Please check Genesis. It is possible that Abraham’s son by his wife’s servant, Hagar, was named Ishmael. The rest of the story is quite thought provoking.

  35. Manuele says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 3:29 am

    Australia police: “No radicalization” in Muslim who stabbed woman while screaming “Allahu akbar”
    MY QUESTION IS THIS “HOW DID THIS AUSTRALIAN POLICE GET THIS JOB? OBVIOUSLY, HE IS AN IDIOT.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 4:05 am

      Or he is either obeying orders, or taking it on himself to aid, abet, counsel and act in furtherance of a criminal act that could also be argued a war crime (crime against humanity). In many legal systems the speaker/officer could, and certainly should, be prosecuted, convicted and sentenced to serve his time with the killer. “Justice. Justice shall you pursue.” Nazi prison guards were prosecuted and convicted for less.

  36. steve says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 7:37 am

    I wonder how the BBC will report that case , Let me guess eh, ”Devout Muslim holidaymaker defends himself against unprovoked, possibly Islamophobic attack by mob with dog .

  37. Jon says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 7:48 am

    The important thing to remember is that even if he wasn’t a self-motivating jihadi, he is a Muslim, and that’s what Muslim males do when a woman knocks them back. We’ve just seen a court case this week in Sydney where an Iranian killed his wife because she didn’t respond in the way he expected of his woman.
    I lost a friend in similar circumstances 20 years ago in Sydney when she didn’t measure up to what her Muslim husband expected of a wife and he shot her dead. In Pakistan there are hundreds of such murders every year.

  38. Tony46 says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 8:50 am

    ”No radicalization”
    Meaning,..”That’s the norm in their world.
    ..

    • Frank Anderson says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 11:20 am

      Meaning to the cowards and fools among us that the behavior is perfectly acceptable in the name of “religious tolerance”. I don’t remember which Communist that said,”We will hang you with your own rope.” The current leadership approach of total concession and appeasement is nothing less than knowing encouragement of the destruction of Judeo-Christian society. It turns the United States Constitution into a suicide pact. Like borderless countries, and sanctuary cities, they defy reason and facts to march all of us into deadly circumstances. The only Radicals in Islam are those who would reform its teachings. Among the orthodox what 1 does with a knife, others do with subtlety and deception. The universal goal of Islam is world conquest and domination. That’s what someone wrote in the name of Mo, and that’s what has been practiced since the beginning. (Mo could neither read nor write.)

  39. Florida Jim says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 10:45 am

    Step by step the anaconda swallows you just like Islam. Deport them and watch your country bloom again.

  40. Dustin Koellhoffer says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 10:51 am

    This is Obamaism. What happens when stupid people vote to make a Moslem leader of the free world.

  41. Vice says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 10:55 am

    To be clear, HE killed the dog. This is because dogs are evil and/or unclean in their backwards ideology. It’s another indicator tying him to islamic terrorism.

    • Greyhound Fancier says

      Aug 27, 2016 at 12:37 am

      The dog was a hero.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 27, 2016 at 11:22 pm

        Hear, hear!

  42. Schrödinger says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    A muslim, an Australian, two Brits and a dog walk into a bar (or was it a hostel?). Screaming allahu akbar, the muhammadan stabs both the poor British woman and the unfortunate dog to death, leaves another Brit critically injured with horrific stab wounds, while the wounded Aussie manages to escape, with this murderous, maniacal jihadi pursuing, still trying to kill him. Police arrive and have great difficulty subduing and arresting the mujahid, who all the while continues screaming his islamic war cry.

    Get the joke?

    It’s even less funny and graver still when considering how appallingly but predictably the police, most (though not quite all) politicians and your ever reliably negligent enemedia, in the face of such incontrovertible, horrific evidence have typically, steadfastly and collectively obfuscated and denied any real link to islam. What do they want — every jihadi to have in their possession a signed letter of personal commendation from the Caliph himself? This abysmal ignorance, cowardice and stupidity (it’s actually criminality) is widespread, almost global (except amongst a relatively few islam aware and muslims themselves). Even if Dhimmis and useful idiots do ever concede any such connection, it’s only ever referred to timidly, by code, as something misleadingly labeled “radical extremism”, since we must never ever attribute the same motives to, the same potential threat from muslims generally and islam specifically. Islam, a peaceful religion, has merely been hijacked, yet again, by a tiny minority of misunderstanders and extremists and blah blah blah. Yet many muslims, around the world, will be laughing their heads off (figuratively though not literally, unfortunately).

    This IS no joke. Violent jihad is the highest ideal in islam — it’s made very clear in the Koran and clearer still in Sahih Bukhari and hence the Sunnah. We’re being violated and brutally murdered, increasingly, everywhere nowadays, and progressively weakened as nations. Nobody’s safe anymore; muslim’s strategies are succeeding, their jihad, their immutable islamic goal of conquest and subjugation is being accomplished at an accelerating rate. WAKE UP, STOP LYING, STOP LETTING MUSLIMS DECEIVE US, STOP DECEIVING YOURSELVES AND HELP STOP IT!

    • Singh the Sikh says

      Aug 26, 2016 at 6:53 pm

      It is one of the numerous manifestations of muslim cultural enrichment which is enhancing western societies.

  43. Bill says

    Aug 26, 2016 at 11:02 pm

    Australians like me heard the Police say that they were not suspecting the killing in Townsville in QLD was caused or related to radicalisation. Unbelievable to the huge majority of people who just have been told the Police in the Islamic terror siege in Sydney by the Islamic preacher Monis was also not declared by the police as Islamic terrorism despite him flying the ISIS flag at the siege. Unbelievable case of PC nonsense, and it reminds me of John Cleese’s Faulty Towers and Monty Python comedy line “Don’t mention the war!” about how the Germans were not to be reminded about Hitler.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.