“Ugly politics on the beach,” as stated in the article below? You can say that again! Only the victim isn’t the one it seems to be in the pictures, although it is easy to spin it that way in Western cultures, where men are made out to be oppressive brutes by frothing leftist feminists, and police are also by the likes of the Black Lives Matter movement. The “ugly politics on the beach” phraseology is yet another demonstration of how Westerners are being manipulated and fooled by taqiyya objectives, i.e., lies and deceptions to further the agenda of jihadi enemies at war with the West.
The burkini ban on many French beaches was deemed “‘necessary, appropriate and proportionate’ to prevent public disorder after a succession of jihadi attacks in France,” yet in the UK’s Guardian below, the article states:
“The images are preposterous as well as ugly, highlighting the profound mismatch between stated ideals and their consequence; and an imagined threat to the national community and the means used to subdue it…”
Tell the victims’ families of the Nice massacre and those who watched an elderly priest get beheaded during mass about any “imagined” threat. There is nothing imaginary about a full-on Islamic religious war against the West, attacking from all directions and using stealth and violent means to do so.
The image of four policemen surrounding this innocent-looking woman lying on the beach like “everyone else,” and of her being “forced” to take off her Islamic covering in full view, was sure to grab widespread attention. The picture presented conjures up bullying, intimidation, victimizing and a violation of rights. Chances are that this “innocent” Muslim woman knew about the ban, calculated a powerful political punch against it, and delivered it hard.
In examining this picture for plausibility, Muslim women who wear religious coverings out of modesty do not part with their coverings so easily, because they are driven by their devotion to religious doctrine, in which obedience to the (male) order of the faith is fundamental. In fact, female Muslim devotees who cover up have presented the West an ongoing challenge — at times openly confrontational — to get them to remove any part of that covering in such serious situations as: providing witness testimony in court, citizenship swearing-in ceremonies, and simply showing their identities for voting at election polling stations. Yet this woman — obediently covering up according to her religious convictions — readily sheds her covering in full view of the male officers, males on the public beach, and with cell phone cameras flicking away, rather than simply getting up to leave and making her case afterward.
Islamic supremacists are adept at exploitation, deceptively playing the victim when expedient, and creating publicity that would further their cause of charging “Islamophobia.”
Take for example, the recent case of the innocent-looking young Muslim woman in Virginia who claimed that she was fired for not removing her hijab, followed by CAIR jumping to her defense.
This woman never showed up wearing a hijab on the job interview, nor for the first two days on the job. She calculated a strategy and gained the publicity she wanted, promoted by CAIR as “Islamophobia.” Even as unindicted co-conspirators to terror, the emboldened CAIR has been at the forefront of driving the “Islamophobia” agenda to beat down any criticism of Islam.
Deception is a well-oiled tool among stealth jihadists; the real intimidators, bullies, human rights violators, victimizers and cons, and even mass murderers globally, are jihadists, despite their propaganda machines working in overdrive.
The Muslim Brotherhood Strategic Plan for North America states in its goal for conquest, which also applies globally:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”
The woman on the French beach did a brilliant job of grabbing media attention and conning the media, according to her likely intent. Articles followed about “Criminalizing clothes” and “Ugly politics on the beach.”
Shame on the media for again not recognizing the real victims, who are the peace-loving French citizens living in fear of another jihadi attack. Muslims should be collectively speaking out in defense of freedom and democracy, and helping heal a nation still recovering from the shock of jihadi attacks. Instead, Muslim provocateurs will use any opportunity to gain more ground through their us-versus-them, victimology narrative. Even with a 1,400-year history of victimizing the infidel and apostate, stealth jihadists manage to advance their oft-employed strategy of making the West (and Israel) out to be the reasons for jihadi anger and violence, while the media is helping them to do so.
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Qur’an 9:29)
“French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban”, by Benn Quinn, the UK Guardian, August 24, 2016:
Photographs have emerged of armed French police confronting a woman on a beach and making her remove some of her clothing as part of a controversial ban on the burkini.
Authorities in several French towns have implemented bans on the burkini, which covers the body and head, citing concerns about religious clothing in the wake of recent terrorist killings in the country.
France’s burkini ban row divides government as court mulls legality
Read moreThe images of police confronting the woman in Nice on Tuesday show at least four police officers standing over a woman who was resting on the shore at the town’s Promenade des Anglais, the scene of last month’s Bastille Day lorry attack.
After they arrive, she appears to remove a blue long-sleeved tunic, although one of the officers appears to take notes or issue an on-the-spot fine.
The photographs emerged as a mother of two also told on Tuesday how she had been fined on the beach in nearby Cannes wearing leggings, a tunic and a headscarf.
Her ticket, seen by French news agency AFP, read that she was not wearing “an outfit respecting good morals and secularism”.
“I was sitting on a beach with my family,” said the 34-year-old who gave only her first name, Siam. “I was wearing a classic headscarf. I had no intention of swimming.”
I created the burkini to give women freedom, not to take it away
Aheda Zanetti
Read moreA witness to the scene, Mathilde Cousin, confirmed the incident. “The saddest thing was that people were shouting ‘go home’, some were applauding the police,” she said. “Her daughter was crying.”
Last week, Nice became the latest French resort to ban the burkini. Using language similar to the bans imposed earlier at other locations, the city barred clothing that “overtly manifests adherence to a religion at a time when France and places of worship are the target of terrorist attacks”.
The Nice ban refers specifically to the truck attack in the city on 14 July that claimed 86 lives, as well as the murder 12 days later of a Catholic priest near the northern city of Rouen.
The ban by several towns will come before France’s highest administrative court on Thursday following an appeal by the Human Rights League, a French NGO. It is challenging the decision by a lower court in Nice, which upheld a ban on the outfit by the town of Villeneuve-Loubet.
Villeneuve-Loubet, just west of Nice, was among the first of 15 towns to ban the burkini, triggering a fierce debate in France and elsewhere about the wearing of the full-body swimsuit, women’s rights and secularism.
A Corsican mayor has also banned burkinis, amid tensions on the island and violent clashes between villagers and three Muslim families. Skirmishes at a beach in the commune of Sisco earlier this month left four people injured and resulted in riot police being brought in to stop a crowd of 200 Corsicans marching into a housing estate with a high population of people of North African origin, shouting “this is our home”.
A police investigation is under way to determine the cause of the violent brawl, although there has been no confirmation from authorities as to whether anyone on the beach was wearing a burkini at the time…”

cara says
they should ban as many muslim things as possible . however , how many muslim men have they accosted and told to stop doing something ? it is e asy to pick on a woman . women are abused and taken advantage of all the time . you make me sick. have you stopped muslim men from bothering females ?
Mockingjay says
Come on – “it is easy to pick on a woman”…
– THIS SO CLEARLY WAS A SET-UP!
Christine Williams is right: this woman KNEW about the new law, put on a burkini anyway, and then, INSTEAD OF LEAVING, started to “strip”.
Imagine the outrage in the muslim world about the picture of a muslima being “forced” to “strip” by four infidel men.
But the muslim outrage cannot even compare to the outrage in the Western media, amongst leftists, and…feminists.
Yes, feminists.
They are VERY concerned over the rights of muslim women all of a sudden.
“Why can’t a woman wear what she wants to the beach?” they ask.
The question seems so, so reasonable.
And by our WESTERN standards, yes, a woman should be free to wear whatever she wants.
The problem is, that for “religious” muslims, our Western standards mean nothing at all.
Our standards about pretty much everything are utterly inferior to them.
But they sure as hell know how to use our standards and ethics against us.
Mockingjay says
Excellent article:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/civil-rights/292335-burkini-toxic-ideology-not-a-dress-choice#.V794ob-uw_k.twitter
carpediadem says
Agree completely. This is not a job for scarce police officers.
The police harassing the women should be deployed dealing with Muslims threatening people and blowing themselves and others up!
Carolyne says
The problem is that these women are wearing these ridiculous garbs specifically to cause incidents. When one lives in France, one should assimilate, not do everything possible to retain their own country’s culture. If they wish to keep that culture, they should remain in the Islamic world. The outfit she is wearing is specifically to remind the French that she is above them and it signifies terrorism to many. In fact, it would frighten some of the French who might have witnessed barbaric acts by Muslims in France. It is just another step in the subduing of the civilized world.
Bukkdem Jizheads says
I don’t know about now, but Tunisia banned the Niqab and Burka. This strategy makes the extremists go somewhere else. As a result, Tunisia had a thriving resort economy.
Carmel says
This scene is staged all over. As one can read on PAMELA GELLER website, the lady has no cream around , no food , no drink . The photographers came in just at the right time . This is a frame -up to make muslims and especially muslims women to look like victims of the intolerant , bigot and islamophobe europeans.
The best muslims elements, the more brilliants out of them , are always staging a scene to be in the news for the next days. At this game they are very good . It works . One week it is burkini on beach , then it is a mosque near Pise tower. Before , it was a mosque at ground zero, veils on cross in town hall or college, hidjab in RCMP police in Canada etc…Always something to put Islam on front pages. Muslims in America are maybe 2 % or the population and they get 20 % of the news.
Angemon says
Let me guess: shame on the police for upholding the law.
carpediadem says
There are ways to handle this issue without police on the beach. It is ridiculous.
commonsense says
Yes. The best way is to deport all Muslims. Problem solved.
Carolyne says
No Muslims–no burkas. Good idea.
Angemon says
Such as? I’m genuinely curious as to what could be alternative to having law enforcement enforcing the law.
Jake Bell says
If you showed up in any public place in the US wearing white robes and hat with your faced covered, you would be immediately removed and charged with who knows what. It’s the same thing with muslims, don’t let them get away with intimidation.
linnte says
I agree that a head/face covering should be banned. But what about if I want to be on the beach in jeans and a T shirt? A diving suit? Skirt/dress with long sleeves? How about people who are very sun sensitive like me. Skin cancer pops up easily on me.
It is the covering of the face that seems most important to me. I support police doing their job 100% but maybe this law is too strict? I doubt very much I would be told to leave the beach if I was in jeans and a long sleeved shirt and a scarf on my head.(not hijab).
Cynthia in California says
The burkini is a specific garment with a specific religious meaning. Geert Wilders has described it as “a Muslim uniform, as unwelcome in public as a Nazi uniform.” Jeans and T-shirt do not convey the Muslim cultural message that a burkini does.
I sunburn pretty thoroughly myself and usually wear a T-shirt over my bathing suit, even to a pool. I can’t stand the beach–too much sand in awkward places in my anatomy as a child and young teen turned me off to sand forever.
Westman says
The solution seems simple to me.
No persons, male or female, of any ethnic origin, should be allowed on the beach, mall, airport, highway, or any public place wearing clothing that purposefully hides their body type and face from unique personal identification.
There is a public safety reality that requires the ability to visually identify and find any persons involved in criminal or terrorist activity. There is something insanely illogical and nefarious about allowing the public to don ethnic uniforms that hide identity more effectively than those “disguises” worn by typical bank robbers.
Many robbers in Europe and the US have already robbed banks wearing burka garb that hid their weapons and faces. Google it.
linnte says
As long as identity can be established, yes, that should be the goal. The ban is only until the end of August. It should be made permanent.
Carolyne says
None of the clothing you mentioned signifies that you are a member of a group which considers itself superior and that has the goal of conquering for their religion. I know of no religion which specifies you wear a t-shirt because Allah demands it and because you are a woman who is inferior to men When you find one, let me know.
linnte says
I do agree with you on this Carolyne, but there is the “Big Brother” aspect of this that, imo, needs to be considered also. I’ll be damned if someone is going to tell me what I can wear, ANYWHERE, unless it is private property that I am going to and a dress code is the rule. I think the hijab and Burqua et al are indeed symbols of superiority from the perspective of a Muslim woman. Well to heck with them. We KNOW they have no idea what real Liberty is. Liberty allows for anyone to wear what they please. I think this is one example where, unlike wearing a niqaab into a bank, Liberty should be an example. And the ban is only temporary.
vlparker says
I agree. As long as their face is exposed they should be allowed to wear what they want. The stupidity was letting them into the country in the first place. This nonsense just distracts from the real problem. If you are going to ban clothing because it is associated with Islamic supremacism then you must also ban islam, which they aren’t doing. So declare islam a seditious ideology (which it is) and then you can ban anything muslim to your hearts content. But if you are too PC to ban the religion then leave the clothes alone, as long as their face isn’t covered.
linnte says
Yes! Ban Islam, period! Who in their right mind would want to invite people who practice a Totalitarian ideology into their country? Globalists do. Because Globalists are Totalitarian in their agenda.
Carolyne says
linnte—Absolutely 100% correct.
Peter Ahlskog says
One of the beaches where Muslim women showed up in burkinis is located 150 meters from the street in Nice where the rapidly radicalized Muslim man murdered so many people with his rented truck!!!
This is nothing else then a demonstration with the message “Islam is here to take over”!!! “See what we can do!!!” “We can kill your children, rape your daughters, fill your teenagers with drugs, take over your cities, frighten your policemen, murder your homosexuals, change your women’s leisure habits and how they dress, build mosques everywhere with Imams preaching terror”.
Cynthia in California says
Thank you, Peter. Well said.
Slavonian says
Actually, burquas are so cool. you can slip into your lover’s burqua to administer a cunniligus while she;s talking to her jihadi husband!
Carolyne says
Absolutely right on, Peter.
John Stefan says
A lawyer told me some years ago, “Anybody can do anything that they want as long as nobody stops him.”
Custos Custodum says
Most Westerners will have missed that there is something profoundly wrong with this story in terms of Muslim logic.
The images show that the woman is actually removing her hijab as ordered by the police, for maximum propaganda effect. An observant Muslima would not have put herself in that position, and would have left the beach rather than remove her covering.
Mockingjay says
“Maximum propaganda effect”.
Well said, Custos.
Carolyne says
And it appears that she is wearing a turquoise swimsuit under that garbage bag. She was ready for this civil disobedience to demonstrate the superiority of Islam and it’s subjugation of women.
somehistory says
Siam. “I was wearing a classic headscarf. I had no intention of swimming”
Of course, it was *classic*….unmistakable in its meaning so everyone would know to bow and curtsy and shake in fear when her husband arrived.
*Classic,* as applied to the head covering for moslim females, signifies worship of satan’s beast…and they wish to scare the rest of mankind into worhipping also.
Richard Paulsen says
Regarding that newly discovered planet looking almost like the Earth.
If U.S.A. and Europe will be the first to colonize it, I am afraid it most probably will be an islamic state.
Better if Russia or China will reach it first. If so civilization will have a chance up there.
At least it will most probably be an islamic state U.S.A. and Europe colonizing it before Russia or China do.
I think.
Cynthia in California says
Colonization by Japan would also be beneficial. (No Muslim immigration for Japan! National policy.)
Richard Paulsen says
That´s true of course. 🙂
KnowThyEnemy says
Folks, even if everything goes well, it would take 1100 years to get to that planet! (Watch this video)
We don’t have 1100 years. Chances are that Muslims will subdue even Russia and China in the next one hundred years and then no one will be getting to that planet. For this reason we really have no option but to figure out a way to somehow defeat the Islamo-Left alliance.
Richard Paulsen says
Right. There is no more time to loose. For sure. The islamic aggression towards the west must be stopped. Question is how.
Seems very hard. Must be stopped right now. The responsibility of every civilized person.
KnowThyEnemy says
“Question is how.”
There are ways, though most of them will take their time to work out. Currently the best action to take for Americans is vote for Donald Trump. (Non-Americans too should help by doing their own pro-Trump campaigning on social-media etc).
Trump should be voted for even if he changes his stance on Muslim immigration. Voting for him would be a signal to all other politicians that if they want votes they are going to need to get tough on Islam and its followers. It would also signal that compromising American values and principles, as the Democrats have been doing, is not acceptable to voters.
Whether Trump wins in November or Hillary, we need to understand two important things-
1) The government can only do so much. We, the Islamo-realists, are the ones who are going to need to do the real work. Primarily this work involves informing fellow non-Muslims of the dangers posed by Islam (and its followers) and encouraging them to take action to defeat Islam. (Actions like running for office and/or voting for an Islamorealist candidate.)
2) If Islam is thoroughly defeated in any one country, it would soon be defeated all over the non-Muslim world because of the globalized nature of today’s world. Within a few decades Islam would fail in the Middle East too. Now since we do not know which country might become the first country to defeat Islam, we need to help and support anti-Islam activists everywhere. Right now everyone should be doing their part to help Trump win the US presidency.
If Hillary wins, it would be a big setback to the anti-Islam effort but there still are things that can be done. We need to brainstorm and share our ideas. I will share my own ideas in a later post.
Linde Barrera says
Hi my dear JW friends, I offer 2 points: To the brave French police who gave this Muslim dame a ticket/summons, I say “Bravo. Vive la France!” To the Muslim dame, I would sing the theme song ? to “Gypsy”: and then I would say to her “Take if off, take it all off!” ?FINALLY, I WOULD TELL HER TO GET THE HELL OUT OF FRANCE AND BACK TO THE BEACH OF HER ISLAMIC HELL HOLE OF A COUNTRY. ? And no apologies to CAIR-France. ?
jeremysteering@gmail.com says
Well said! The French get a rough deal from the world’s media!
Carolyne says
Linde, you are perfectly free to feel as you do and your religious background is, of course, your own business. I am not hampered by religion as I am an Atheist. I have the freedom to hate whomever I wish and I do hate Muslims.
Jay Boo says
Burkini is a scuba suit looking thing.
If Muslim women had any real shame they would not wear such a hideous thing on the beach but not because it is UGLY.
After all the recent attacks by their fellow Muslims on French civilians including children, they should wish to avoid wearing anything associated with ISLAM.
Unfortunately, Muslims have no shame at all.
BC says
Women in Islam are taught from the earliest years to be ashamed of their sex and to respect only the male, A woman has only one purpose to marry a man and procreate, preferable male children
Carolyne says
You are right, BC. In Islam, there is no attempt to hide your disappointment when you have daughters, inferior beings that they are. In the west, we are proud of our children of either sex and we do not set limits on their apparel for some outdated, misogynistic ideal. In the west, women have no limits as to what they can do as opposed to what men can do. Put that in your hooka and smoke it, Sham.
Carolyne says
A couple of days ago there was a graphic description of MFG which sent chills down my spine. It demonstrated that Muslim women are. in effect, de-sexed at an early age so they really become nothing except an object for a man to abuse in any way he wishes. This alone causes me to hate them all the more.
Guest says
“I created the burning to give women freedom not take it away.” Who is this idiot and who does he think he’s fooling?
Burka’s are the furthest thing from freedom.
Carolyne says
Burqas and this ridiculous burkini are symbols of Women’s enslavement in Islam. I would not want to allow anyone walking down the street shackled in chains to show they are owned by another person. It is the same thing.
Felix Quigley says
I speak on this issue as a Marxist and a Trotskyist and I say clear the French beach if this filth
The issue of special Muslim clothing “for the beach” (the burkini) is part of the overall Great Jihad of Muslims to create special conditions for Muslims to live in countries in which they are only yet a minority. Just let the Muslims become a majority though and this demand will change and become compulsory for ALL women to cover up their bodies everywhere, even on the beach. Brigitte Anne-Marie Bardot where are you when we need you?
But what should the French state do? For one thing the state should have a data base of all Muslims living in its jurisdiction. ID should be taken and fines should follow which should be relentless.
The French must have a definite position on Islam. It must be illegal to practise Islam in France. This means that the first practical step is to stop all new mosques being built, stop praying in public places, close down ALL already existing mosques.
The idea of being able to control Islam which is the current vogue must be kicked rapidly into the dustbin.
The idea of being able to reform (have a reformation!) Islam should ditto asap find its way into the dustbin.
But who is to carry this out? Certainly the present bourgeois states of Europe and America have no stomach for the fight.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 ipened the door not to the idiocy of Islam but to a flowering of the arts and to an end to the subjugation of woman. Even though this was arrested by the counter revolution and Stalinism was the end result of this we know enough about the Bolsheviks and Islam to show that Islam was incompatible with Lenin and Trotsky’s vision.
As is well known there are many former Muslims who have left Islam but they live in fear of deadly reprisal from Islam. Under the present bourgeois regimes they are given no help whatsoever. France is a typical example. The burkini is banned only by a few mayors and anyway I argue that Islam itself should be outlawed with the immediate closure of all mosques. This is typical. These half measures will mean these courageous mayors will be isolated while the main danger lies in the mosques and the inaction of the French leaders on the issue of the mosques.
This is why a revolutionary party based on Trotskyism must be fought for in France to lead the masses to the socialist revolution and the necessary step on the way, in fact the first step given today’s conditions, is the destruction of all forms of Islam in France.
The database is most important. This will mean deporting many.
Every Muslim deported will mean a purifying of the air of France.
Charli Main says
So, when are the French police going to start arresting the Muslim vermin that go on beaches and start throwing rocks at women wearing bikinis and calling them ” whores” and ” prostitutes” ??
Scorpio says
There has been significant Muslim immigration into Europe for say, the last 50 years and for the first 25/30 years they, the Muslims were relatively peaceful and as the numbers grew so did the problems. This is now 2016 and I would be interested to know when the issue of burkini’s started? I don’t recall any issues until the last few weeks and if this is correct then the issue before us has nothing to do with freedom of women to wear what they like but everything to do with the nasty Muslim habit of making a political statement with the sole intention of causing more trouble between the West and Islam.
As many Westerners have said, repeatedly, and been howled down by the progressive left, Islam is utterly incompatible with Western values and we should bite the bullet and be very circumspect about allowing further Muslim immigration. Indeed, I would go as far as to say that all Muslim immigration should be conditional on their adherence to Western values and failure to comply would mean immediately deportation. This would make life better for Westerners and make Muslims think twice about wishing to come to the West.
Michael Copeland says
“Using deception to mask intended goals”
Is a stated aim in the Muslim Brotherhood plan.
It’s quite unaffected by Western opinion polls,
And is something we need to get used to as soon as we can.
DP111 says
Lets see the reality.
1. The French have been subjected to a daily war, for over a decade against them by Muslims. Thousands of cars are burnt each day. Hundreds assaulted. All to shouts of “Allahu Ackbar”.
2. And last, huge terrorist attacks on France by Muslims.
France is in effect, in a state of war. Many public events in France have been cancelled. There is a huge drop in tourism, and therefore money. There must also be a drop in the GDP.
Instead of understanding and sympathising with the French, Muslim women are deliberately provoking the French, by their “in your face attitude”. “Insult to injury” comes to mind.
They are doing this deliberately to provoke the French, who have suffered enormously. Its virtually a war situation in France. Muslims wearing Muslim garb are creating a situation where there could be a serious disruption of civil order.
Yet the French have been measured in the extreme, to tolerate the continuous intolerance and hatred of Muslims for France. The response of the authorities to openly wearing a uniform of the enemy, on French territory, has been mild. In different, more normal times, the miscreants would have been shot.
Klaas says
You nailed it. You cannot say on the one hand that you are at war, and at the same time tolerate the uniform of the enemy in the streets (or beaches).
But sadly, the French authorities do not understand that ALL of Islam is the enemy.
DP111 says
Just think. In WWII, would we allow Germans settled in Britain, to walk about the beaches in Nazi regalia. And yet, this is exactly what Muslims are doing. They are provoking and testing, while milking for sympathy.
Felix Quigley says
The problem in France is the mosques or in other words Islam. But to make it concrete the mosques must be closed and I mean every single one.
Without starting there in a concrete fashion nothing can be achieved.
This is the weaknerss of Nigel Farage and usch people they talk good but they achieve Little. Even after winning Brexit Farage refuses to nove against Islam. And there are others!
Mary TC says
Mary TC
I hope and pray the West will soon understand that Islam is and has been from its beginning a religion that loves war and death and hates anything and anyone that is not Muslim. Those brought up with its teachings are imbued with this hatred and are encouraged to lie to non-Muslims and conceal this hatred when it is convenient. Muslim men cannot understand our culture, which admittedly has its own terrible wrongs but at least allows many basic freedoms while Islam represses freedom, especially for women.
Besides Robert Spencer’s excellent books, I’ve learned a lot from a book by a Muslim woman, Wafa Sultan, “A God Who Hates”, which really is an eye-opener about the Muslim mind.
Mary TC says
MaryTC
I would like to add that, of course, there must be many Muslims in the world who do not wish to hate – such as Wafa Sultan – but expressing that wish would be very dangerous for them in countries where Islam is dominant. Some Muslims suffer persecution and even death if they are deemed to have insulted Islam by questioning the example and sayings of The Prophet.
jeremysteering@gmail.com says
The French are given a hard time, particularly by the British media, but what other country has their courage in taking a stand against Islamist supremacy? It’s hard to imagine anyone in the British or US governments echoing these words:-
French Prime Minister Manuel Valls defended a ban on burkinis in more than a dozen coastal towns on Thursday, saying France was locked in a “battle of cultures” and that the full-body swimsuit symbolized the enslavement of women… We have to wage a determined fight against radical Islam, against these
religious symbols which are filtering into public spaces.”
Former head of state Nicolas Sarkozy said, “The Burkini is a political act, a militant act, a provocation. Women who wear it are testing the Republic.”
DP111 says
This Muslim woman living in France, knew precisely what she was doing.
France is in a state of war. The entire armed forces of the republic are deployed on full alert, as if the Nazis were coming over. This is because Muslims living in France, have been attacking France for the last ten years, on a regular basis. Major events in the life of the nation have been cancelled.
The French have had enough. Then to provoke the French even more, this Muslim woman was made to get up to this provocation. Can you imagine what we would do in WWII, if some Germans living in Britain, dressed up as Nazis and walked along the Kent coast. Oh yeah. I can see Churchill seeing the funny side. Yup.
Or imagine if Muslims attacked that Kuffar parliament, and killed a dozen MPs. Then a week later, some Muslim woman in a niqab, with a great big bulge, walked over to parliament square. Oh yeah. I can see the authorities seeing the funny side of it. Or maybe not. The niqab would have so many holes in it, that it would qualify as a bikini.
Klaas says
Basically, wearing a burqa, niqab, burkini or even a hijab in a western country is an act of terrorism. That’s how it is intended. The women may not be aware of this, but they are being manipulated.
Marty says
Needless to say the French Supreme Court has decreed the ban is illegal
& mohammedans can continue insulting us in our own lands.
The problem with the French Secular State is that it pretends that all
religions are equal & a private matter.
They are not.
France is headed for massive trouble unless the FN
get elected to the presidency, which sadly, they won’t
KnowThyEnemy says
The worst thing we can do is to have a pessimistic attitude. France has elections in April and May of next year, and you never know who might win. For this reason, people should do everything they can to campaign for FN [on social-media etc].
Jan says
It’s fine with me if an immigrant wears the clothing of her own culture, as long as she doesn’t try to tell others what to do.
jeremysteering@gmail.com says
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Politicians and the media are lining up to condemn France and their “provocation” of Muslims with the “burkini” ban, shamefully implying that they are bringing problems onto themselves. Casting them as somehow the guilty party, victimising innocent Muslims.
They conveniently ignore the obvious point that well before any ban, extremist Muslims still found reasons to launch their deadly attacks in Paris, Nice and Rouen. The hatred and evil was already there, and didn’t need any “provoking” from the French or anyone else.
Ciudadano says
Banning niqab, burqas, etc. is a shortsighted policy. They are attacking the symptoms instead of attacking the sickness. The west must develop comprehensive, well throughout, policies to destroy ISIS ideology, the same ideology that forces women to wear niqabs, burqas, etc.
The reason we don’t want niqabs and burqas is because those are the same clothes ISIS imposes on women. Muslim women in the west “voluntarily” donning those clothes tacitly are supporting ISIS ideology. A Muslim woman wearing a niqab or burka in the beach is sending a message: “I agree with ISIS impositions on women, I reject western culture and want to change it”.
It has nothing to do with “modesty”. There are many ways you can dress modestly in the beach without scaring everybody. For instance many western women wear colorful dresses and hats that blend beautifully with the natural landscape.
Ciudadano says
My point is wearing a dark burqa or niqab in the beach sends a political message for everybody to see. Modesty is just an excuse. You can wear modestly in the beach and at the same time harmonize and blend with your surroundings. Wearing a dark niqab or burqa int he beach sends the message that you agree with ISIS point of view regarding how women should wear.
Aspy says
These pigs want to impose their will on another culture & their way of life forcefully. They should all be deported, the slime balls.
Alvin Woods says
And exile the far left while we’re at it.
KnowThyEnemy says
That one is easy to do. The lefties say they will move to Canada if Trump wins. So vote for Trump 🙂
janet says
I need to point out something according to the newspapers mayors are not allowed to tell woman what to wear. Now lets think back to London. If i remember righly the mayor stopped adverts of woman been put on busses. Didn’t he say because it was body shaming? There for he actually had no legal right to do this. Its not uo to him to say what a person is wearing is body shaming.
DP111 says
Forget about burqini or terrorism. The real problem is that Muslim population is expanding rapidly, at around 4% a year. This means it will double in around 70/4= 17.5 years. Say 20 years.
Assuming a present Muslim population of 5 millions in the UK, will double to 10 millions in 20 years, 20 million in 40 years, and 40 million in 60 years. Factor in more immigration, and family reunification, we have a situation that in around 50 years, Muslims will be a majority in the UK, and sooner in Europe, that one time Christendom.
It goes without saying, Muslims will institute Sharia via the vote. No doubt of it.. That has been the goal of Islam since its inception 1400 years ago. There has been no instance in history, when Islam has not wiped out the society it has been allowed to move into -either by conquest or by immigration. None. That is how the West will end, due to a serious lack of education and ignorance of history. Its a pity that Churchill is not alive, as he knew Islam.
Charli Main says
If Churchill was alive today, the Muslim Council of Britain would have ordered Sharia May to have him imprisoned in the Tower of London for ” upsetting ” the Muslims.