• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Islamic State: If Muslims ran America, black slave trade would have continued

Aug 2, 2016 3:37 pm By Christine Douglass-Williams

“In a bizarre digression from their latest anti-Christian tirade, the Islamic State addressed the question of black slavery, claiming that if Muslims had been in charge of Western states, the slave trade would have continued.”

The Islamic State message should be no surprise, given how blacks are treated throughout the Islamic world, despite the IS explaining that it’s more about slavery of the infidel than about race. One need only look at the racist genocide of blacks in Darfur and the slavery of blacks still going on in Islamic states, as well as the deep involvement of Arabs in the American black slave trade.

Jihad Watch reported about an Islamic State message to Ferguson protesters last year: “Hey blacks ISIS will save you”; and has also reported about instances that reveal the black-jihadi alliance in America. For example, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan accused whites of persecuting blacks, pointing out ominously that the Qur’an teaches that persecution is worse than slaughter (cf. Qur’an 2:191 and 2:217) , thereby justifying the slaughter of the alleged persecutors. Farrakhan then called for a bloody race war when he stated that he was looking for “10,000 fearless men” to “rise up and kill those who kill us; stalk them and kill them and let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling!”

He was referencing police shootings of blacks, although whites get shot by police far more frequently than blacks do; more violent crimes are being committed by blacks; and blacks kill blacks in staggering numbers. But Farrakhan does not care about those inconvenient truths. Why? Because he is racist himself, and acquires money and fame from sensationalizing historic black victimization.

The Washington Post has also reported that the Islamic State, along with other jihadist movements, was taking advantage of the Ferguson crisis to recruit blacks for jihad.

The article stated: “All of the jihadists interviewed said Brown’s death confirms their beliefs that blacks are seen as second-class citizens by whites and especially by the police. ‘I think that blacks in the U.S. will look more towards Islam,’ said Anjem Choudary from Great Britain, co-founder of the banned ‘al-­Muhajiroun’ group.”

The fact that Muslims enslave blacks in Islamic states is nothing new, and now that the Islamic State has come out and stated that if Muslims ran America, “Lucrative African Slave Trade Would Have Continued”, where is Farrakhan in his condemnation of black slavery?

The Islamic State supported its position about slavery on Islamic theological grounds, and went on to blame the “emancipation and the end to black slavery on a corrupt Christianity that has gone soft and no longer lives according to the most brutal dictates of the Old Testament”. It goes on to state that “the clear difference between Muslims and the corrupt and deviant Jews and Christians is that Muslims are not ashamed of abiding by the rules sent down from their Lord regarding war and enforcement of divine law”.

To be noted in the very telling article below: the Islamic State directs its most vitriolic rancor against Jews, but also states what it would have done to Native Americans and the Japanese.

Stacks of evidence reveal clearly that the West is at war with jihadists who base their atrocities on a literal reading of Islamic texts; yet the Pope and leftist leaders continue to deny the religious nature of this war, even as the Islamic religion inspires the very zeal that drives it on.

slave-trade-

“Islamic State: If Muslims Ran America, ‘Lucrative African Slave Trade Would Have Continued’”, by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, August 2, 2016:

In a bizarre digression from their latest anti-Christian tirade, the Islamic State addressed the question of black slavery, claiming that if Muslims had been in charge of Western states, the slave trade would have continued.

If Muslims rather than Christians had been running things in countries like the U.S., the Islamic State argues in the most recent issue of its propaganda magazine Dabiq, “the lucrative African slave trade would have continued, supporting a strong economy.”

As usual, the Islamic State supports its position with theological arguments, suggesting that Allah is pleased with slavery, as long as the slaves are infidels.

“The Islamic leadership would not have bypassed Allah’s permission to sell captured pagan humans, to teach them, and to convert them, as they worked hard for their masters in building a beautiful country,” the article reads.

Trading in black African slaves, the magazine notes, would not be done for racial reasons but religious ones.

“All of this would be done, not for racism, nationalism, or political lies, but to make the word of Allah supreme. Jihad is the ultimate show of one’s love for his Creator, facing the clashing of swords and buzzing of bullets on the battlefield, seeking to slaughter His enemies – whom he hates for Allah’s hatred of them.”….

….The Islamists blame emancipation and the end to black slavery on a corrupt Christianity that has gone soft and no longer lives according to the most brutal dictates of the Old Testament.

“The clear difference between Muslims and the corrupt and deviant Jews and Christians is that Muslims are not ashamed of abiding by the rules sent down from their Lord regarding war and enforcement of divine law,” the authors claim.

“And since those mujahidin would have done so bound by the Law, they would have been thorough and without some ‘politically correct’ need to apologize years later.”

Along with African slavery, the Islamic State authors also state that “if it were the Muslims,” instead of Christians, who had “fought the Japanese and Vietnamese or invaded the lands of the Native Americans, there would have been no regrets in killing and enslaving those therein.”

“The Japanese, for example, would have been forcefully converted to Islam from their pagan ways – and if they stubbornly declined, perhaps another nuke would change their mind. The Vietnamese would likewise be offered Islam or beds of napalm.”

As for the Native Americans, the article continues, after the slaughter of their men, “then the Muslims would have taken their surviving women and children as slaves, raising the children as model Muslims and impregnating their women to produce a new generation of mujahidin.”

Finally, the Islamic State authors turn to the Jews, saving some of their most bitter vitriol for their sworn enemies..

“As for the treacherous Jews of Europe and elsewhere – those who would betray their covenant – then their post-pubescent males would face a slaughter that would make the Holocaust sound like a bedtime story, as their women would be made to serve their husbands’ and fathers’ killers.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), slavery, United States, Useful idiots Tagged With: Black slavery in Islam, Christianity, Dabiq, Holocaust, Japanese, Native Americans


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. willrodgers_2 says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 3:41 pm

    No doubt about it. The muslims are the worst and most ruthless slave traders in th world. they’ve been at it for 1400 years, and never had to face a civil war over it, because it is approved by their imams along with the approval of sex slave trade.

    • jihad3tracker says

      Aug 2, 2016 at 5:30 pm

      For those of you who have not seen this video by the brilliant David Wood, take a look: “Muhammad — the White Prophet with Black Slaves”. On his website — http://www.answeringmuslims.com — by typing that title in the search box.

      It runs about 10 minutes, with even MORE than his typical amount of citations from the Hadith to back up what he asserts. There are plenty of jabs at persons and organizations that exemplify Leftist hypocrisy in their constant insistence that our Western hemisphere has been the real racist location.

  2. common sense says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 3:58 pm

    Yet somehow Trump offends leftist morons. Makes sense actually since most libs don’t do their homework.

    • Yorkshire Kufir says

      Aug 3, 2016 at 4:04 am

      A sweeping statement. And entirely wrong. What US-based right wingers call liberalism is in fact marxism. What true liberals want is freedom of the individual from religious and other idealism-based systems of (lack of) thought.
      Liberals do their home work and weigh the facts. The facts are: Islam is an arab supremacist hegemonising political system. Right wingers in america will not let facts get in the way of their ideology either. Real Liberals are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea, because they are hated by Authoritarian simple-mindedness. Both Islam and GOP are in agreement on this. Stop looking for traitors among potential allies.Liberals, and aetheists want the end of Islam. But I guess GOP hates them too.

  3. Paul N Silas says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 4:00 pm

    Nope, not true, there would be a “Christian Slave Trade”, Remember the Barbary Pirates, and how President Jefferson had to send in The Marines to get our Sailors back? These savages will make a slave of anyone.

    Two Jihadist were plotting an IED attack in Iraq, in their apartment. Suddenly there was a knock on the door. The senior Muslim asked “Who is it?”, and a gruff U.S. Marine answered, “72 Virgins!”.

    • Nigel GFF says

      Aug 3, 2016 at 5:39 am

      “From the Halls of Montezuma
      To the Shores of Tripoli; ……”

      A new game – spot your mum or pass the baby. The wee bairns must find it tough (oh you islamophobe) and I thought penguins had a difficult job finding mummy – sound & smell I guess.

  4. Angemon says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 4:15 pm

    In a bizarre digression from their latest anti-Christian tirade, the Islamic State addressed the question of black slavery, claiming that if Muslims had been in charge of Western states, the slave trade would have continued.

    “Bizarre”? Far from it.

  5. Michael Copeland says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 5:04 pm

    “Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam.”
    Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan,
    professor, imam and eminent Saudi scholar.
    http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/slavery-part-islam-%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%80%9C-muslims-speak

  6. Peter says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 5:24 pm

    Wonder why?

    Ibn Khaldun (apparently, the second greatest Muslim after Muhammad): “The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, owing to their low degree of humanity and proximity to the animal stage. (Bernard Lewis, Race and Color in Islam, Harper and Row, 1970, quote on page 38.)

    Muqaddimah: “Beyond [known peoples of black West Africa] to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings.”

    And,

    “Therefore, the Negro nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because [Negroes] have little [that is essentially] human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated.”

    Black Africans suffered the most of any race from centuries of Muslim depredations. Per Political Islam, “for 25 million slaves delivered to the [Islamic] market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.” The imposition of Islamic law in Sudan after 1983 resulted in the death of 2 million black Africans by 2000.

    In 1945, King Saud met President Roosevelt on the U.S.S. Quincy. The king’s entourage included slaves. Where were they from? Africa.

    The Ottoman ban on slavery (1852) was met by Meccans, who got most of their slaves from Abyssinia (East Africa), with the same bogus arguments as made by southern white planters (e.g., slavery is good for the slave, blacks are inferior). In 1962, Saudi Arabia banned slavery, but Islam permits the practice, and the voices of Muslim advocates of slavery are still heard. ISIS, of course, resumed the practice, including of sex slaves.

  7. mccode says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 5:26 pm

    Those burka babes just look so liberated, I tell you.

    I am still outraged that the MSM never reports how women are trapped inside a medieval body bag whenever they are ‘allowed’ to be out of their home.

  8. خَليفة says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 6:13 pm

    Mohammed tried that to the Jews, killed the men, made the women serve. Funny how a jewess from one of those events served Mohammed poisoned food which caused Mohammed to die after an agonizing few days.

    It is the best example for Muslims to be killed by Jewish women. Allah knows best.

    David Woods video on Mohammed’s death:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6st_tFj6ouM

  9. CrankyWW says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 6:20 pm

    While discussing nuking Japan and napalming Vietnam, they fail to realize they’d have never been able to do either of those things because they wouldn’t have had the technology. They didn’t even know how valuable the oil they’re sitting on was until white infidels showed up and taught them what to do with it.

    • Christopher471 says

      Aug 3, 2016 at 7:02 am

      Enslaving the Japanese? What a laugh! If a muslim army could have been formed they would have lasted a few days or weeks against the Japanese Imperial Army. It needed the full force of the American forces and 2 nukes to do the job. When Brits and the Germans were fighting in north Africa where were the brave Egyptians, Algerians and Moroccans? They must have been on holiday.

      • Mazo says

        Aug 3, 2016 at 3:07 pm

        The general Muslim world population does not equal isis.

        Muslim Moroccans were in the WW2 French army and Muslim South Asians were in the WW2 British army both of which fought the Germans and Italians.

        Libyans fought against the Italian occupation.

        Same goes for the previous comment which seems to be directed at Muslims in general. Pakistan has nukes.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 3:55 pm

          The sand-throwing Mazo wrote:

          The general Muslim world population does not equal isis.

          Muslim Moroccans were in the WW2 French army and Muslim South Asians were in the WW2 British army both of which fought the Germans and Italians.

          Libyans fought against the Italian occupation…
          …………………………….

          These same Muslims also gleefully mass-raped Italian women whenever they got the chance.

          The implication that since they sometimes fought the Fascists that they ergo were fighting for democracy and freedom is just ludicrous.

          While some Muslims do oppose ISIS, this often has to do with their being Shia–Sunni ISIS targets Shi’ites for rape and murder–or else they just think someone other than Al-Baghdadi should be running the Islamic State.

          But how many Muslims actually oppose what ISIS and the Islamic State *represents*–a brutal Shari’ah State and the Caliphate?

          All pious Muslims believe in the global Caliphate, and all of them believe in the imposition of bloody Islamic law.

          So the idea that “general Muslim world population does not equal isis” means far less than Mazo would have us believe.

  10. Mockingjay says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 6:21 pm

    Man – these “jihadis” are doing a much better job at exposing islam than any anti-jihadist ever could.

    This article, including the other one about “Why they hate us”, should be emailed to every anti-racism, LGBT, and EVERY other leftist “interest” group that exists in the free world.

  11. gravenimage says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 7:52 pm

    Islamic State: If Muslims ran America, black slave trade would have continued

    ….The Islamists blame emancipation and the end to black slavery on a corrupt Christianity that has gone soft and no longer lives according to the most brutal dictates of the Old Testament.
    …………………………

    Well, I’ve long said this.

    It was the civilized West who adopted abolition and ended the slave trade.

    Slavery only ended in Dar-al-Islam–to the extent that it did–due to pressure from the Infidels. Slave markets were openly held in the streets of Riyadh when I was a baby.

    Slavery never went away in Mauritania–an estimated one in five there is a slave.

    And now Muslims are bringing it back–even selling sex slaves online:

    “Islamic State seems to be selling sex slaves online”

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/islamic-state-seems-to-be-selling-sex-slaves-online

    God, I hate Islam.

    • Mubarak says

      Aug 3, 2016 at 2:38 am

      We are bewitched by “fifty shades of gray” in the West, and in the Muslim world they are bewitched by fifty shades of black; they are just taking the bewitchment a step further.
      So it is in the bewitchment and fascination of the mind it starts.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 3, 2016 at 4:25 pm

        The weasely Mubarak wrote:

        We are bewitched by “fifty shades of gray” in the West, and in the Muslim world they are bewitched by fifty shades of black; they are just taking the bewitchment a step further.
        So it is in the bewitchment and fascination of the mind it starts.
        ………………………….

        What witless moral equivalence.

        Comparing interest in reading a mildly spicy romance novel–since that is essentially what “Fifty Shades of Gray” is–with slavery and sex slavery is simply grotesque.

        Moreover, despite its slightly racy reputation, what “Fifty Shades of Gray” goes on to do in the later books is actually confirm the virtues of true love, marriage, and family–the very things destroyed by Muslim slavery.

  12. Burt says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 8:36 pm

    The false religion Islam is such an effective way for twisted souls to give themselves permission to indulge in their sick fantasies, parade them and crow about them.

    It makes bad men even badder!

    When they meet their maker (who is definitely not Allah) they will be bound to admit they knew in the deepest parts of their souls they were acting against all true morality, they were acting against God but loved that they had an excuse to indulge in evil.

    If any so called ‘moderate’ Muslim is reading this admit it. It’s so obvious the faith handed to you by your parents is manifestly wicked.

    Show some decency and renounce your false religion.

    If that would mean you risk being ‘executed’ (murdered) for apostasy then you would be a genuine martyr as opposed to your co-religionists who get killed or kill themselves through terrorism.

    If you live in the west that isn’t too likely to happen so there isn’t really much stopping a decent person doing the decent thing.

    Be a good person. reject your evil creed.

  13. gravenimage says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 9:01 pm

    “The Japanese, for example, would have been forcefully converted to Islam from their pagan ways – and if they stubbornly declined, perhaps another nuke would change their mind. The Vietnamese would likewise be offered Islam or beds of napalm.”

    As for the Native Americans, the article continues, after the slaughter of their men, “then the Muslims would have taken their surviving women and children as slaves, raising the children as model Muslims and impregnating their women to produce a new generation of mujahidin.”
    …………………….

    The above is *especially* telling. How often have we heard from Muslim apologists that the West cannot criticize Islam because of our own sins–real and imagined?

    The idea is always that Muslims would never have done any of these things.

    But now the mask comes off–Muslims would not just have done these things, but have done them with relish.

    The truth is that the West is introspective about our actions–not so with supremacist Islam. But they sneer at us for this.

    And where our actions were defensive–as against the Japanese during WWII–we fought them until they stopped their aggression, and then we did not just stop the war, we *helped them rebuild*. This idea is completely alien to Islam.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Aug 2, 2016 at 9:39 pm

      Correct graven. Their souls and consciences have been seared with evil; and they know no shame. They will learn all about it – in time.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 2, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        EYESOPEN, the Qur’an itself tells Muslims to “let no compassion move you” while imposing the horrors of Islam. Islam systematically dismantles the conscience. Just appalling.

        • Mark Swan says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 6:16 am

          These guys can not even defeat the surrounding Arabs, yet boast of taking on three much more formidable foes, such as the Vietnamese, the Japanese, and Native Americans, any
          one, of which would have kicked their ISIS butts, in short order.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 4:32 pm

          Also true, Mark!

      • Mubarak says

        Aug 3, 2016 at 2:57 am

        So will everyone everywhere “speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron”, except for those that will learn all about it – in eternity.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 4:56 pm

          More from the insincere Mubarak:

          So will everyone everywhere “speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron”, except for those that will learn all about it – in eternity.
          ……………………

          Why is Mubarak quoting 1 Timothy 4:2 here?

          We in the West regularly consult our consciences–that is what led us to embrace abolition of slavery in the first place.

          I can think of *nothing* that so “sears the conscience with a hot iron–i.e., cauterizes it–as does Islam, which sternly admonishes its followers to “not let compassion move you”.

        • Mark Swan says

          Aug 3, 2016 at 11:16 pm

          Good point gravenimage

  14. somehistory says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 10:15 pm

    The photo shows one such group of *slaves* and they are clad head to toe in black bags. If they treat their own women that way, it is unthinkable that they would treat any people they consider as a *lesser* group, any better.

    When Diane Sawyer or Ashley Banfield see photos such as this, do they think back about the time they went to Afghanistan or Iraq, and spoke of the cruel and backward, inhumane and evil, way the women were treated and made to dress?
    Ah, how easily some humans forget.

  15. CrossWare says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 10:55 pm

    I guess ISIS just want to support Black Lives Matter by telling them they are valuable (as slaves).

  16. Rob says

    Aug 2, 2016 at 11:46 pm

    Relax Barry.
    I understand people of mixed parentage can get ‘white’ status if they lick enough sandals.
    Aaahh OK you already thought of that.

  17. Baucent says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 2:03 am

    “the lucrative African slave trade would have continued, supporting a strong economy.”

    That’s almost a Trump sized gaff. But food for thought for those 9 black Trinidad ISIS recruits. You can imagine their job allocation on arrival in Syria….latrines.

  18. abel & solomon says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 5:41 am

    New Article; Sharia and Human Rights (read it all here http://abelandsolomon.simplesite.com/424567656 )

    Here is a direct comparison between the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the relevant provisions of Sharia Law, Article by Article.

    1. Article One declares that all human beings are free and equal, but Sharia recognizes and condones slavery, for example, (K2:221) “A slave…is better than a free unbeliever..” and it also denies equality as in (K4:34) which says “men are in charge of women…”, Ibn Kathir’s commentary on the Koran explains; “Men are superior to women, and a man is better than a woman”.

    2. The Second Artcile states that there should be no discrimination against anyone on grounds of status, but Sharia discriminates on many bases, religion, gender, sexual preferences; for example under Sharia charities must not help non-Muslims and must donate some to fund jihad (K28:86; “never be a helper to the unbelievers”/ “Umdat al Salik; Reliance of the Traveller” H8.7,H8.17,H8.24).

    3. The right to life, liberty and security is also negated by provisions of Sharia, being gay is subject to a death sentence pursuant to the rule (HAD 38:4447-8) “kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done”. The Sharia crimes of leaving Islam and blasphemy, which include criticizing the religion, the Prophet, or Allah, also give rise to the punishment of death.

    4. We have already noted that the rule there should be no slavery is broken by Sharia recent reports say that about 4% of the population of Mauritania are in slavery, a system held in place by Sharia. (source CNN; “Turning point for slavery’s last stronghold”)
    Sex-slavery is permissible in Sharia.

    5. The forbidding of torture, cruel or degrading treatment is also ignored, the exceeding cruelty of FGM is a prescribed part of Sharia and its rapid growth in the West is due solely to Islamic immigration. From many Islamic nations, including “moderate” Indonesia, there are many press reports of individuals being lashed or even stoned to death for adultery and extramarital sex.

    6. Everyone has a right to recognition as a person at law, but Sharia can reduce a woman to being mere property of a man as a sex slave (see K33:50,4:24, 23:6,4:3 “those whom your right hand possesses”). In Saudi Arabia a woman my not leave her home without the permission of her male guardian and does not have the legal status to hold a driving licence.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 3, 2016 at 5:50 pm

      That’s why the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” is so perverse.

      • Mark Swan says

        Aug 4, 2016 at 10:03 am

        Absolutely—Human Rights and Islam can’t be mixed.

  19. Marty says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 5:43 am

    This is obvious.
    The slave trade worked very efficiently, & very cruelly.
    1 Africans raided other tribes & carried off slaves.
    2. Some they kept but most they sold on to mohammedan arabs.
    3 Males that the arabs wanted to keep were castrated.
    4 If women, retained as domestic slaves or harem inmates, had any children
    they were strangled or drowned at birth to keep the arab race “pure”.
    5 The rest were sold on to Westerners where they were treated badly, but better than indigenous criminals, who had no value & were not bought.

    In the 17th Cen there were up to one million “Christian slaves” in Morocco alone.
    (See White Gold written by Giles Milton)
    Today, the only slaves in Europe are owned illegally by Africans & muslims.
    In Africa, the trade continues unabated, driven by muslim beliefs.

  20. pennant8 says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 10:23 am

    All those garish looking skyscrapers springing up all over the Arab world are for all intents and purposes being built by slave labor.

  21. Crusades Were Right! says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 10:48 am

    One thing’s for sure – you won’t find this kind of thing highlighted on CNN or the rest of the “mainstream” media. It just doesn’t fit with the narrative, i.e. White Christians being the source of all evil in the world.

  22. Michael Johnson says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 4:57 pm

    Thank God for the battle of tours the crusades and the reconquista because if these battles didn’t happen the Muslims would have discovered the Americas and we all would be Muslims as a American black man this is offensive to me because I’m a descendant of American slaves from the states of Louisiana and Mississippi that means I would have my genitals cut off and I would be a eunuch and the women would be sex slaves no way I would ever be a Muslim this just proves Islam is a racist religion only for male Arabs everyone else is considered garbage

  23. Mr S says

    Aug 3, 2016 at 11:59 pm

    Historically accurate and also i think ISIS trying to appeal to white supremacists

    • Mark Swan says

      Aug 4, 2016 at 10:16 am

      There aren’t many of those guys left, but they can have what they can find.

      ISIS is trying to draw a clear line, showing who they are, who all Muslims should be,
      and all the rest on the other side of that line, in their opinion, and all this is based on Islam.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 4, 2016 at 12:52 pm

        Yes–ISIS is Islam without *any* mitigating factors.

        • Mark Swan says

          Aug 8, 2016 at 1:49 am

          Yes—ISIS is Islam, in its natural state—pure form—no pretense—the embodiment of Islam in action.

          Anyone who says different, needs to read the Quran, anyone who says different and has read the Quran, is a Muslim, and is practicing deceit.

  24. King Tut says

    Aug 4, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    and who brought the African slaves to America and were behind the slave trade? the Jews. don’t take my word for it. look it up.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 5, 2016 at 5:47 pm

      Unhinged antisemite “King Tut” wrote:

      and who brought the African slaves to America and were behind the slave trade? the Jews. don’t take my word for it. look it up.
      ……………………..

      Good God, what claptrap. Jews were an even smaller minority in early America than they are today. The idea that they were “behind the slave trade” is absurd.

      There were a handful of Jewish traders in cities like Philadelphia involved with the “Triangular trade”, carrying slaves, cash crops, and manufactured goods between West Africa, the Caribbean or American colonies, and Europe, but that was about it. There were Jews who owned slaves–they made up less than 1% of Southern slaveowners.

      Then there were Jewish abolitionists like Rabbis David Einhorn and Michael Heilprin, and speakers like Ernestine Rose.

    • Mark Swan says

      Aug 8, 2016 at 1:51 am

      Who led the Civil Rights efforts in the Civilized World?

  25. Heather says

    Aug 4, 2016 at 2:32 pm

    It amuses me how the backward muslim men hate women with a passion. Is it jealousy or do they think they came from a cabbage patch? Just as retarded as the gay idiot they follow.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.