• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Italy: Muslim group demands legalization of polygamy as counterpart to legalization of gay marriage

Aug 10, 2016 12:20 pm By Christine Douglass-Williams

Over two years ago, Jihad Watch covered the story of the Muslim cleric in Germany who declared that Muslims in the West should “demand their rights” to practice polygamy.

Now Westerners are again faced with the same demand, only made more strongly, and this time in Italy. It comes from the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations, Italy’s largest Muslim umbrella group. The argument: if gay marriage, which Muslims disagree with, is a civil right, then Italians must accept polygamy as a civil right, too.

This so-called civil rights call for the institution of polygamy represents far more than some pursuit of a status equal to that of gays. Polygamy is a degradation of women’s rights, and represents a rejection of democratic constitutions that uphold the principle of equality for women.  This case for polygamy is an example of how Islamic supremacists use our democracies against us and encroach upon our freedoms in their pursuit of Sharia. Note also that Hamza Piccardo, the founder of the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations, stated:

“Do not underestimate the demographic action of polygamy. It would rebalance population decline and the consequent need for foreign labour.”

Piccardo presents polygamy as a solution to labour shortfalls, when his real agenda of colonizing the West through the Islamic practice of hijrah has been glaringly revealed in his call for polygamy.

polygamy

“Muslims demand Polygamy In Response To Same Sex Unions”, by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, August 9, 2016:

Following the introduction of civil partnerships, Muslim representatives in Italy are now demanding the legalisation of polygamy.

Responding to a new law allowing same sex couples to enter civil unions, Hamza Piccardo argued that if gay relationships, which Muslims disagree with, are a civil right then Italians must accept polygamy as a civil right too.

The founder of the Union of Islamic Communities and Organisations (UCOII) in Italy took to Facebook to claim polygamy is a “civil right” and that Italy would benefit from the large number of Muslim births it would promote.

The UCOII president wrote: “When it comes to civil rights here, then polygamy is a civil right. Muslims do not agree with homosexual partnerships, and yet they have to accept a system that allows it. There is no reason why Italy should not accept polygamous marriages of consenting persons.”

The call for polygamy, from Italy’s largest Muslim umbrella group, was met with outrage by a number of politicians.

Debora Serracchiani, deputy chairman of the ruling Democratic Party (PD) said: “Centuries of fighting for women’s rights can not simply be brushed aside.”

“Polygamy has nothing to do with civil rights,” she added.

Paolo Grimoldi, an MEP for the anti mass migration Northern League, declared: “This is the moderate Islam, with which the Italian government intends to keep the dialogue open.”

Reflecting on the debate his Facebook post unleashed, Mr. Piccardo said: “A simple consideration of legal philosophy has sparked an uproar so grotesque as to be even funny.”

Doubling down on his earlier plea, the head of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked bodyinsisted polygamy is a civil right and a matter of “equality of citizens before the law”.

The former European Muslim Network spokesman also suggested Italy needs foreign labour and that polygamy would boost the nation’s economy.

Mr. Piccardo commented: “Do not underestimate the demographic action of polygamy. It would rebalance population decline and the consequent need for foreign labour”….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: caliphate, dhimmitude, Featured, Italy, Jihad in the West, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: polygamy, Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Paula says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:30 pm

    Unfortunately, when debating the introduction of gay marriage, one thing was forgotten in most debates and discourse … a positive account of what marriage actually is, other than ‘two people who lurve each other’. And then, an account of what, if anything, this has to do with the State – apart maybe from tax laws and a few practical things like that. There were those who warned at the time that this meant there was nothing to prevent calls for polygamy, or any other form of multiple partnerships – because what is magical about the number two? Nothing. So, there is nothing in any current account of marriage that ensures that there are not going to be more attempts to broaden it.
    So, what is happening, yet again, is that Islam is taking advantage of the failure of the West to define its values with sufficient clarity and vigour to fend off the constant erosion of our civilisation. Of course, you can in fact make out a good case for restricting marriage to pairs of people, but it’s more complex and involves actually thinking about what we value, and why. Which we urgently need to do, in this as in many many other cases.

    • El Cid says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:18 pm

      Paula, exactly. Given that the EU follows ‘human logic’ and no tradition system of ‘values’, the Muslims are quite right to demand their marriage arrangements.

      It is just part of the path to an complete Islamic State. They will not stop unless they are stopped. The history on this point is clear.

    • c matt says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 3:00 pm

      They actually have a much stronger argument (at least historically) for the practice of polygamy. It’s been around nearly as long as civilization. Gay marriage, never heard of until the recent insanity.

      • Shane says

        Aug 11, 2016 at 11:17 am

        Yes, the ancient Jews practiced polygamy with David and his son Solomon having many wives, even more than Mo did!

        • Karyn Stark says

          Aug 11, 2016 at 9:12 pm

          You do realize of course, that King David, and King Solomon are long since dead and the practice is not condoned today even by orthodox Jews? Or am I missing your point?

        • Shimona from the Palace says

          Aug 12, 2016 at 11:13 am

          It was permitted, but not encouraged. The Muslims seem to encourage it. And let’s not forget, the Bible says: “A man shall cleave to his wife” – NOT “to his wives”.

    • Denise says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 8:55 am

      The eventual consequences of gay marriage were not overlooked, many people brought up these issues but they were ignored. Gay marriage is like spiting right in GOD’s face and it will not stand, neither will polygamy. However, I do wonder if polygamy were to be made legal would Koranic law then allow homosexuals to marry?

  2. Peter says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:34 pm

    Why not polyandry, too, then?

    • Kay says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 9:48 pm

      This might be the most effective argument against it, strangely enough.

  3. Peter says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:35 pm

    Oh, and sex slaves, too?

    • eur says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:39 pm

      step by step

      • VampireJack says

        Aug 10, 2016 at 2:26 pm

        Until finally they demand to be able to marry 6 year old girls.

  4. Berengaria says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:39 pm

    I’m not sure that Polygamy is NOT being practiced in the Islamitized
    USA. When the Mormons demanded polygamy, the US Army chased them into Mexico. Now, Islam is a whole different story. We are demanded by Black Rule to accept the customs of the Muslims, & their many wives.

  5. My Opinion says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:54 pm

    So, let’s assume that our feckless, pandering leaders agree…there should be the stipulation that if one has multiple wives, they cannot collect ANY type of welfare or stipend…I mean one wife stays home and takes care of the whelps and the “master” and the other wives work and pay their own way.

  6. Stan Dobson says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 12:57 pm

    Kick them out -the problem will only get bigger if they are allowed to stay – they will always find something to gripe about with the western way of life. Send them back to where they will be poor but happy!

  7. Rich says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 1:05 pm

    How would you like to be forced to have sex with that fat f u c k? Now there’s a bad day at the office, huh? Damn.

    • miriamrove says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:08 pm

      His wives don’t look like Hiedi Klm either. m

      • Gen Jones says

        Aug 10, 2016 at 2:10 pm

        I believe he’s on oxygen too, unless that’s some fancy Islamic mustache jewelry under his nose. The gals are not only showing their loyalty with that pose, they’re hiding the tank. What a specimen of virility!

        • somehistory says

          Aug 10, 2016 at 5:49 pm

          Yep. The tube is going across his fat body and under his clothing on the side.

    • Trico says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      “How would you like to be forced to have sex with that fat…”
      Now you know why there is the Burka. Cover & Disguise EVERYTHING except the eyes. Then let your imagination & fantasies fly.

      • duh swami says

        Aug 11, 2016 at 10:24 am

        The fantasy is usually better than the reality…

        • Trico says

          Aug 12, 2016 at 7:03 pm

          “The fantasy is usually better than the reality”
          Yep, keep the Burqa on.

    • CJ says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 2:06 pm

      There’s a cord that runs across his chest and under his nose. Pretty sure he’s on oxygen, so he might not be too…active.

      They look like a family of penguins — minus the penguin cuteness.

  8. Trico says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 1:12 pm

    If Muslims would just be patient they can not only have legalized polygamy but much much more:
    Q&A:
    Q. When is a Sexual Perversion NOT a Sexual Perversion?
    A. When it’s reclassified as a Sexual Orientation.
    “Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says not only is all hell breaking loose after the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage, but we’re on the fast track to legalizing “12 new perversions,” including pedophilia and bestiality.”
    “We’ve already found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department,” DeLay said. “They’re now going to go after 12 new perversions, things like bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that legal.”
    Source: http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/1394679/tom-delay-bestiality-pedophilia-department-of-justice
    –
    “Legalizing Sexual Child Abuse: Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation”
    Source: http://www.truthandaction.org/legalizing-sexual-child-abuse-pedophilia-now-classified-sexual-orientation/
    –

  9. eur says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/too-sick-to-work-migrant-gets-to-bring-three-wives-20-children-to-denmark

    • Kay says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 9:55 pm

      That’s easier than a hard day at the office!
      & who’s paying for all of them?

      • f c king says

        Aug 11, 2016 at 4:13 am

        Jizya. Salami, salami, bologna.

  10. Alvin Woods says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    They look so much like your typical Italian family in that photo, how very quaint….

    • eur says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:44 pm

      yeahhh !!! They are about to sing Azurro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1VGoKBKR3I after eating Pizza

    • Eric says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 10:05 am

      Lol

  11. Guest says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 1:50 pm

    A man can only love one woman, otherwise he is no man.

    • Trico says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 1:55 pm

      “A man can only love one woman”
      Who said anything about love? Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, …

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 10:32 pm

      There is no love in Islam.

  12. Buraq says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 2:14 pm

    I suppose when these ladies discuss who is to draw the short straw, they are referring to a certain part of this clown’s anatomy. Because they will all have to draw the short straw at some time or another, if you see what I mean.

  13. c matt says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    Well, they do have a point. If gender is irrelevant to marriage, then why is number relevant? If marriage can be whatever you want it to be, then how do you argue against their position?

    • Westman says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 4:08 pm

      Number is relevant because it represents additional financial and social burdens upon the state without an equivalent source of support for each additional instance. Harems are not cost effective to the state while both monogamous hetero and homosexual unions are.

      Allowing polygamy for Muslims is eqivalent to throwing away the wealth of the nation and ultimately giving the nation to the most prolific breeders. That is not a goal of democracy.

      UCOII should be pronounced as Yuckii.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 3:57 am

      I count six wives over for lunch.
      Four are wearing hijab.
      Two have become — Burps.

  14. marina says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    To the women in that picture ” Where is your self respect”?

    • Nigel GFF says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 5:10 pm

      Locked away with their FGM, in that box they call Islam.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 10:36 pm

      Pious Muslim women are not allowed any self-respect.

  15. Tommy says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 4:45 pm

    When gay marriage was legalized in Massachusetts, judge Margarete Marshal called marriage an “evolving paradigm” .

  16. WorkingClassPost says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 5:19 pm

    Having one of those days when I’m very slightly bewildered by the absolute absurdity of the world we live in, and this family photo is stretching my credulity.

    Is there some kind of cosmic April Fool’s day, that lasts for many decades of Earth-time, a bit like dog’s years compared to human years?

  17. somehistory says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 5:58 pm

    And they argument put forth is that there will be “children”…..arrggghhhh!!!!

    Pity any children from this group in the photo. Pity any children born into the cult of the beast.

    And since they don’t think they should *work* but should live off of Christians whom they extort, pity those expected to pay for the upkeep of this group and others like it.

  18. Walter Sieruk says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 6:19 pm

    Polygamy is not sanctioned by God. For example God gave Adam one wife. Furthermore, in the New Testament Jesus taught “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife…” Jesus said “wife.” Not “wives” Mathew 19:5. [K.J.V.] Likewise, in First Timothy 3:2. In instructs “A bishop the must be blameless, the husband on one wife.” Here again it’s “one wife” Nevertheless, there are some people who will act as apologists for polygamy by say the king David of Israel and then later his son ,who became King Solomon of Israel did practice polygamy. Such people aren’t taking into account both the time and place. For the only reason that God did tolerate this tradition was not because it was right or that He approved of it. It was because this practice of having many wives was such an entrenched custom in the ancient Middle East that God allowed it for the above mentioned Kings of Israel. This does not mean that this custom, of polygamy, was to keep on going in other times and places.

    • Kay says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 10:11 pm

      Right. Everything is in the Bible and not everything is holy.
      But some people seem to love to teach what they don’t know–or at least twist it for their purpose.
      A certain group we know is practiced at twisting everything. Their book might be called Justifications.

    • Trico says

      Aug 10, 2016 at 10:53 pm

      “Polygamy is not sanctioned by God.”
      No, but it is sanctioned by Allah.

    • Cristalexi says

      Oct 23, 2016 at 6:07 am

      I agree, the bible clearly shows that God’s plan was always one man/one woman relationship.

      One reason I have come across for God allowing men to have more than one wife in the past was due to wars which caused problems for some women being able to find a husbands.

      Polygamy is not only against women’s civil rights but also against men’s civil rights because it causes an imbalance where if some men have 4 wives there will then be a lot of men who have no wife. This is what will happen in Western societies if this practice is allowed. Maybe with all the wars in Muslim countries where lots of men are killed, this may not be such a problem, so maybe they should go back there if they want more than one wife.

      • Trico says

        Oct 23, 2016 at 1:06 pm

        Muslim Polygamy has nothing to do with Marriage and everything to do with Population Domination which will lead to Political Domination.

  19. TR says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 7:27 pm

    If they want to have us change our laws and morals to match theirs from the old country under Sharia Law, Why the Hell did they come here but for the Left’s promise of a Great Jihad. Deport them while we still can!

  20. Injo99 says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 8:20 pm

    Today i saw a docu. about birds.
    A static sayed the birds who had the same partner for life had the biggest brain.
    Birds who had different “partners” had a smaller brain.
    Birds who had an “Harem” had the smallest brain…

  21. gravenimage says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 10:28 pm

    Italy: Muslim group demands legalization of polygamy as counterpart to legalization of gay marriage
    ……………………

    More proof that Muslims in the West will use any of our values to bring us down; considering that when in power they hang gay people from cranes, throw them from tall buildings, and stone then to death.

    • Kay says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 1:11 am

      Yep, they ride a horse for as long as it services them and then jump to a new one. (They’ll jump off the BLM horse too, when it suits them.)
      It’s the ultimate in deception, twisting, and confusion–like the “surprise” at the outcry against polygamy so that “it’s almost funny.”
      But if there hadn’t been outcry, then their immoral stance would just grow unimpeded. One way or another, they cry foul if we object and then keep manipulating our systems until they break them down.

      The liberal objection I keep hearing is some variation of “it’s just a few.” To me it doesn’t make sense–just a few rapes, just a few assaults, just a few murders, just a few attacks, just a few laws ignored . . .
      But I need a more cogent way to answer these friends.

  22. Lesley says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 pm

    I threw up in my mouth just looking at this charming bunch 🙁

  23. islam the religion of killers says

    Aug 10, 2016 at 11:42 pm

    I can’t see how the politicians can push the “we need the labour” button when all the muslims do is just go on the social welfare, allowing polygamy will just give the male the rights to claim for (as in the picture) 4 wives and christ knows how many children ..

    Islam prevents the wives from working anyway, and what employer in their right mind would employ them …

    Last year in England there was a story on this website, an “unemployed” Imam was pulling over 1,000 pounds per week, plus Accom, thats more than some Britts get PER MONTH ..

    F**K Polygamy call in the IRS

  24. mike ryan says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 12:47 am

    This disgusting pig of an imam and his birthing cows should have no place in our Western world.

  25. LR says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 1:55 am

    c mat,

    “Well, they do have a point. If gender is irrelevant to marriage, then why is number relevant? If marriage can be whatever you want it to be, then how do you argue against their position?”…

    I suppose if we look at the construct of western civilization’s ‘social cohesion’, we could say, ‘gay marriage’ between two loving adults is not a threat to that cohesion. (I know some disagree with that). Divorce rate and single parenting has been more concerning.

    Polygamy, in any kind of legal recognition is definitely a threat to our ‘social cohesion’. Although, I myself have to argue with certain friends as to why this is so. Ugh.
    ***

    Tommy,

    “When gay marriage was legalized in Massachusetts, judge Margarete Marshal called marriage an “evolving paradigm.”

    The secular definition of marriage in our western society has meant a legal union between a man and a woman.

    This, in my mind was why I thought some people made a good argument against gay ‘marriage.’ Allow ‘civil unions’ with all the same rights as in ‘marriage’, but do not change the definition of ‘marriage,’…ergo, the likely progression of polygamy being seen as a civil right, etc.
    ***

    Peggy,

    …”So, what is happening, yet again, is that Islam is taking advantage of the failure of the West to define its values with sufficient clarity and vigour to fend off the constant erosion of our civilisation.”…

    I agree. We better stick to the number 2 being the magic number for legal marriage, otherwise all polygamists will push this.

    The Mormons who are living polygamously are few, and have not been a threat to our culture. We know the Islamists are different.

    The problem now is, we are blowing it since we have already allowed polygamists to immigrate into our country.

    Citizens who care about these issues have a lot of work to do.

  26. f c king says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 4:11 am

    They should let this porker have eight of those piglets.

  27. Norwegian says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 4:24 am

    I demand that ALL muslims be deported…

  28. Nigel GFF says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 4:58 am

    OT

    “Muslim women are the most economically disadvantaged group in British society, according to a report by MPs.”

    “The starkest comparison is in the proportion of women who are classed as economically inactive – that is, unemployed and not seeking work.”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37041301

    Of course, islamophobia is the cause. MPs are searching out the employer islamophobes. The ‘starkest’ reality, though mentioned, may cause itchy scalps but I suspect the real cause will elude them.

  29. Angemon says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 7:20 am

    Responding to a new law allowing same sex couples to enter civil unions, Hamza Piccardo argued that if gay relationships, which Muslims disagree with, are a civil right then Italians must accept polygamy as a civil right too.

    Yeah, how about “NO”? Civil rights are NOT bargaining chips. Muslims have the right to get married in the same way as gays do. If you don’t like it, GTFO and go live in Iran or Saudi Arabia. Ups, almost forgot – you’re not here because you like the laws and customs, you’re here to change the laws and customs in those of Iran or Saudi Arabia.

  30. talker says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 7:29 am

    We don’t want them breeding at all in our country let alone having polygamy sactioned and given even more welfare money.

    Paid to breed the soldiers of Allah who will turn on and MURDER our children for being non Muslims IN ACCORDANCE WITH SHARIA LAW . NO POLYGAMY, NO SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR MUSLIMS.

  31. desidude2 says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 9:30 am

    in their muslim countries a majority of men are restricted on the number of women they can marry not because they can’t it’s because they cannot support additional wives and children. In the wets the muslim can have 4 wives and 4 kids each wife living on welfare and subsidized housing.

  32. Jean-Francois Morf says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 9:31 am

    Allah (=Satan) is injustice: because 25% richest muslim mens have 4 wife, 75% poorest muslims mens find 0 wife. Because births are 50% boys 50% girls.
    On most muslim photos, you will see only 75% poorest muslim guys, without any muslim women.
    And if these 75% wifeless guys have any friend, they are declared “gay” and stoned!
    Christian is justice: every 1 christian has only right to have 1 wife.
    Allah (=Satan) order to 1 billion muslims mens to kill 3 billion non-muslim mens, in order that 1 billion muslim mens can have his 4 sexual slaves, promised from Muhammad…
    And this will happens if the politically correct politicians does not cease their stupid lies!

  33. Eric says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 9:59 am

    Polygamy whether officially legalized or done in a Religious ceremony in a mosque has the potential to fastforward the islamization of our Western Countries and all the negative effects that come with islamization. Have no doubt that there will be a major push not only for polygamy but also for underage marriages as the muslim demografic grows. Some people will say they are citizens like anybody else so it doesnt matter, do you like Western style Freedoms and the Western lifestyle?
    Do you like so see sexy girla in Summer in Hot pants?
    Do you like to go to parties, dance, drink, have fun?
    Would you like to go to a Restaurant and order a big fat Pork Steak?
    Would you like your daughter to travel unmolested in the Public Transportation?
    Would you like to live in a place where the people regardless of their colour speak your language and dress and behave Western?
    This list could be made longer and longer but you get the point.
    We dont hate muslims but we understand that their culture is dangerous to our way of life if their demografics allow them to take over or influence how we live.
    MARK MY WORDS islam is too strong of a culture, it cannot be controlled, it strives to influence and where possible to dominate and sometimes even to terrorise, but in all of this its the Demografics that matter, 1 Lion vs a herd of Buffalos is as good as dead, 100Lions well you get the point.

  34. David says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:16 am

    Love the photo! Cockroaches breeding in their nest! Time for a dose of RAID for roaches?
    If these criminals are doing this HERE, I hope that U.S. law enforcement has the guts to arrests them and throw their sorry butts right in jail.
    And feed them pork products at every meal!

  35. duh swami says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:45 am

    No man with 4 wives is that fat…Mahound had many wives and hundreds of slave girls to keep him occupied when not out robbing and killing……He never weighed more than 99 pounds and finally he died if sheer exhaustion…

    • Trico says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50 am

      “He never weighed more than 99 pounds”
      Duh Swami. You are failing to take into account the only reason Mohammad maintained a svelte weight was so he could fit into Aisha’s clothing.

  36. Carolyne says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 11:34 am

    OK, fine. If polygamy is a human right, then it applies to both men and women equally and would permit women the right to have multiple husbands. How would the dirty old Muslim men like that>

    In that picture, I think the four wives have been feeding that repulsive fat slob entirely too much.

  37. epistemology says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    Who do these bastards think they are? Western parliaments make laws in Western democracies, not some muzzie invaders. They have to abide by the law and mustn’t try to change it. No sharia the most abominable law in Western countries. No other cultural group acts like that. Muslims live at the expense of their host countries and want to rule them. No way!

  38. John A. Marre says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    Coming to the USA. I absolutely guarantee you, the tax code will be “adjusted” to give them the same benefits as for people with “only” one wife.

  39. Nanook says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    Ah ah.
    On this point (homosexuality), Christians & Muslims are both ready for chumps debates…
    Not a surprise… I don’t know what to say.
    As good Christians I thought you would protect the weaks.
    Homosexuality exists since man exists.
    Assholes 🙂

  40. Iftikhar Ahmad says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    Marriage is as important to the future of the nation as climate change and poverty, a senior family lawyer said yesterday. Baroness Deech said the growing numbers of families without fathers was doing more harm to the next generation than other factors such as smoking, alcohol, poor diet and lack of exercise. And she warned that a conspiracy of silence surrounded the issue because political leaders were afraid to say married families were better for children than cohabiting families or single parent families. Children of single mothers have greater problems than those of cohabitee parents, and children of cohabitees have greater problems than those of married parents. Without both a mother and a father children don’t get the whole package when they are growing up and don’t develop the whole gamut of emotions. Children deserve natural parents who are prepared to make the act of commitment and aspiration found only in marriage, in order to demonstrate to those children that they intend to be there for them, without question, as they grow up.

    The wedding ceremony highlights the fact that marriage is the strongest bond ever invented to link together two people and two families, for now and posterity – intimately, legally, politically, religiously, civilly and publicly. God gave us instructions to follow so that we would live properly. Religion is pushed aside. It’s ok now to have children outside marriage. It’s ok to be homosexual. You don’t get punished properly for coming crime. It’s ok to sleep around and do what you want… Take God out of the equation and the world goes to rack and ruin. Just look at the world getting worse over the years. Oh, and before someone says religion causes war… Religion doesn’t cause wars. It’s mans own greed that twists religion to suit his need that causes war.

    Polygamy is the best solution to end prostitution and teenage pregnancies and abortions. Every male must be allowed to have at least four wives to eradicate immoral behaviour in the society. A former Dutch MP has admitted that recognizing polygamy in law is the next logical step after redefining marriage to include same-sex couples. Speaking to the French online magazine, Yagg, Boris Dietrich said there was now a movement in the Netherlands to introduce multi-partner marriages. The Archbishop of New York, Timothy Dolan, has expressed fears that politicians would redefine marriage to include “multiple partners” after same-sex ‘marriages’ were introduced in the state in 2011.The youth wing of the Finnish Green Party also proposed the legalisation of polygamy in the country in July 2011, whilst the Toronto District School Board in Canada came under fire after releasing a poster in schools promoting polygamous marriages

    Have you seen the conditions for having four wives? Have you read up on anything? The Prophet was brought to this Earth as an example to the rest of us on how to live our lives. There were four distinct examples of women in the women he married in his lifetime. He did not marry them because of lust or whatever you’re insinuating. He treated every woman in his life with complete respect and kindness.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

    • Carolyne says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 7:03 pm

      The “prophet” was brought on this earth (And it is debatable if he even existed) to corrupt mankind and teach ignorant people how to steal, kill, lie and mistreat women. Take your prophet (May pigs**t be on him) and stuff it.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 8:05 pm

      The nasty Iftikhar Ahmad wrote:

      Marriage is as important to the future of the nation as climate change and poverty, a senior family lawyer said yesterday.
      …………………………..

      Does this vicious idiot realize that he is comparing polygamous marriage to scourges of our time? It appears not…

      More;

      Baroness Deech said the growing numbers of families without fathers was doing more harm to the next generation than other factors such as smoking, alcohol, poor diet and lack of exercise.
      …………………………..

      Note that Iftikhar Ahmad was on the “Forced underage marriages on the rise in Switzerland” thread yesterday *lauding forced marriage and child rape”:

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/forced-underage-marriages-on-the-rise-in-switzerland#comment-1499327

      Apparently he would have us believe that *child rape* is good for the victim’s health…

      Considering this level of apologia for Muslim savagery, it should come as no surprise, of course, that he is now advocating loveless Muslim polygamous “marriages”.

      More:

      And she warned that a conspiracy of silence surrounded the issue because political leaders were afraid to say married families were better for children than cohabiting families or single parent families.
      …………………………..

      Actually, dysfunctional polygamous unions are terrible for the wives and children–especially when the wives *are* children.

      More:

      Children deserve natural parents who are prepared to make the act of commitment and aspiration found only in marriage, in order to demonstrate to those children that they intend to be there for them, without question, as they grow up.
      …………………………..

      All of these studies, of course, are talking about loving marriages, not the supremacist side show of polygamous unions.

      More:

      The wedding ceremony highlights the fact that marriage is the strongest bond ever invented to link together two people and two families, for now and posterity…
      …………………………..

      Laughable when it comes to Muslims. The Nikah contract is not even between the man and the woman, as in civilized marriages, but between whoever is selling of the use of the female’s vagina–typically the father–and the buyer. The bride seldom even appears at her own wedding.

      More:

      You don’t get punished properly for coming (sic) crime.
      …………………………..

      This said by someone who is lauding *child rape*.

      But he thinks it should be illegal to choose whom to love and whom to marry. *Ugh*.

      More:

      It’s ok to sleep around and do what you want… Take God out of the equation and the world goes to rack and ruin
      …………………………..

      “God” in this thug’s view condones the rape and murder of Infidels.

      More:

      Just look at the world getting worse over the years.
      …………………………..

      It’s certainly gotten much, much worse since Islam began its murderous revival–29,000+ Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11

      More:

      Oh, and before someone says religion causes war… Religion doesn’t cause wars. It’s mans own greed that twists religion to suit his need that causes war.
      …………………………..

      Perhaps Iftikhar Ahmad should tell his “Allahu Akbaring” coreligionists about this…they seem to have missed the memo…sarc/off

      More:

      Polygamy is the best solution to end prostitution and teenage pregnancies and abortions. Every male must be allowed to have at least four wives to eradicate immoral behaviour in the society.
      …………………………..

      Good God…what insanity.

      By the way, forced child marriage–which this thug has condoned–does not *prevent* teen pregnancies–it just makes sure they are sacralized rape.

      Then he goes on to gloat over clueless Western dhimmitude.

      More:

      Have you seen the conditions for having four wives? Have you read up on anything? The Prophet was brought to this Earth as an example to the rest of us on how to live our lives. There were four distinct examples of women in the women he married in his lifetime. He did not marry them because of lust or whatever you’re insinuating. He treated every woman in his life with complete respect and kindness.
      …………………………..

      The vicious “Prophet”–who had many more than four wives–forced a young woman to marry him after he had just murdered her father and tortured her husband to death; he married a little child at six, then raped her at nine; he beat this same wife. In addition to his many wives, he also kept sex slaves.

      He sneered at his thug companions when they failed to rape their captives.

      *This* is the model that the foul iftikhar Ahmad holds up as his vile ideal. *Ugh*.

    • marc says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 8:15 pm

      You are a troll Iftikhar, I have banned you from other forums, and you will be banned from this, you spout this long disingenuous vomit, decent people take the time to answer, and you ignore their responses unless you agree. you have been warned. and start that copy and paste crap here, and the previous threat from 3 years ago stands.

  41. Mirren10 says

    Aug 11, 2016 at 4:58 pm

    So, can us women have four husbands ?

    • Trico says

      Aug 11, 2016 at 5:07 pm

      “So, can us women have four husbands ?”
      No, since a woman is worth half that of a man it goes to reason if polygamy was allowed for women 2 husbands would be max. I suspect the woman is out of luck when it comes to male sex slaves.

      • Carolyne says

        Aug 11, 2016 at 7:05 pm

        No, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If men have four wives then human rights demand that women have the same privilege, although I am not sure it is a privilege.

        • Trico says

          Aug 11, 2016 at 10:00 pm

          “what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. ”
          Yes but try reasoning with the unreasonable.
          –
          Me: “Yo Mohammad, why is a woman worth half of a man?”
          Mohammad: “Infidel, you tire me with your incessant questions. A woman is worth much less than that but we cut them some slack”
          Me: “Mohammad, you know American slang?”
          Mohammad: “Yes Infidel idiot. Allah taught me. Allah knows everything”
          Me: “Mohammad, you still haven’t explained why a woman is worth half of a man”.
          Mohammad: “It’s because of the simple math of procreation.If a woman sleeps with 100 men in a year at the most shewould get pregnant is once. If a man sleeps with 100 women in a year, he could get 100 women pregnant.
          Me: “Well in that case shouldn’t a man be worth 100 times more than a woman”
          Mohammad: “Yes Infidel, exactly, I’m starting to like you. Men are worth 100 times more a woman but we cut it down to just 2 times”
          Me: “Was Aisha the one who made you do that?:
          Mohammad: “Yea”

    • desidude2 says

      Aug 12, 2016 at 9:06 am

      a woman can have 4 husbands as long as she can financially support all of them as well as to satisfy all of them. notice that men can’t have children so they have all the free time to run around and have the wife pay for it all. Now what kind of a woman will take on such a task?

  42. duh swami says

    Aug 12, 2016 at 8:29 am

    I love polygamy, but the wife said no…’I can’t get away to marry you today, because my wife won’t let me’,…That never seemed to bother Mahound…

  43. funnybones says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 3:31 am

    It will make it easier for them to change the demography and in a decade or two they will call for Italy to become an Islamic state and Sharia law to be practised!! If at all, polygamy should be allowed for Muslim women. At least, that won’t change the demography that fast.!!!

  44. Eric Jones says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 9:26 pm

    There is just one thing that gays don’t understand. If they did not have heterosexual parents , then they would not be here.

    Eric

  45. Manuele says

    Sep 27, 2016 at 4:41 am

    THE FAT FUCK. WHAT A BLOODY DISGUSTING SIGHT

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.