The glories of the new, multicultural Europe. If you oppose this, you’re a racist, bigoted Islamophobe.
“BREAKING: Muslims Firebomb Bus in Paris (VIDEO),” by Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, August 3, 2016:
The masked men set up a road block, threatened the bus driver, smashed the windows and set it the bus on fire.
Saint Denis has a large immigrant population.
The passengers escaped before one of the men screamed “Allahu Akbar” as he thew a Molotov Cocktail into the driver’s side, causing a loud explosion. The bus burnt down to a metal hull.
Michael Copeland says
This time Paris. Next – London.
Robeaver says
New York, Michigan, Calgary, Paris, etc.
John spielman says
Well muslim boys will be muslim boys – arson rape murder theft just like their “perfect man ” the one who ALL muslims emulate- muhammed pbuh* that dead rotted demon possessed mass murderer thief liar rapist adulterer and pedophile pervertw false prophet
pbuh* – perpetual banishment unto hell
Shane says
When people say all religions are equally bad, I ask them to compare Mo to Jesus or the Buddha. Clearly, Mo was a Warlord and a rapist, but he was not a holy man.
billdeserthills says
If Mo was around today, he’d be full of holes
Damn you can’t even spell his full name without the moderator erasing it
Alvin Woods says
This time London? London’s been hit repeatedly since they first stepped foot in that land post WW2.
Alvin Woods says
Wow, you were right Michael. London just got hit again tonight. You need to go out and buy a lottery ticket tonight.
david butler says
I got your “Allah Akbar” hangin bitch
Kuffar says
Looks like it is time to dust off the guillotine…
Charli Main says
Yes, time to save ourselves by eliminating Islam’s European sock puppets, starting with Merkel, Hollande, Cameron, Sharia May and the Muslim in the Vatican
laura m. says
Charli: Europe has been invaded and conquered. Soon their globalist puppet leaders will declare shiria law and unleash mayhem, killing and destruction unimaginable. Cowardly apathetic Euro males will line up willingly for execution. Women and girls turned into sex slaves. Some will convert incl. the leaders. A Caliphate will unite with Turkey and the middle east. Euro citizens lack brain cells, unable to use logic or reason things out. Sorry mess.
gravenimage says
Laura, you should not be here counseling despair. Things are dire, but they are *not* hopeless.
At one time Spain. Portugal, Sicily, southern France, southern Italy, Greece, the Balkans, and Israel were all *under Muslim conquest*.
*They* fought back–and prevailed. No reason to surrender.
Paulina says
Gravenimage, I would like to not feel hopeless either. However, back then the people of Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, and France were able to fight back the muslims because they were religious. God answered their prayers and protected them from the evil islam. Now we see mostly atheists and non-practicing Catholics in France.The Catholics probably only go to mass on Christmas, Easter, weddings, and funerals. Mostly older people attended the funeral mass for Fr. Jacques Hamel. We need Jesus to defeat islam because only God can defeat evil.
Mark Swan says
gravenimage, You got it, they will not push their way for much longer, they will be pushed back.
Paulina, Look for a real leadership in the Church very soon—this will re-vitalize the Christians.
There will be a very different European Union soon, it will strongly support this re-vitalization.
This Muslim pushiness will subside rapidly, under these very different conditions.
gravenimage says
Lanya LaPunta wrote:
Just a thought. As close to eighty percent of all mohammedans, living in Western Europe are on full taxpayer provided support … their very food, clothing, shelter, medical care, cash stipends, etc., is stolen from the citizenry to provide for them and their familes …
If the mohammedans were to take over the West, who would be left to support them? It is painfully obvious that mohammedans are incapable of work … So, how will they eat?
……………………
Lanya, I’m afraid the Infidels *do not* need to be in charge of their own nations in order to feed the invading Mohammedans.
If you look at Islamic history, Muslims have levied crippling Jizya or enslaved us outright.
Then Muslims live off the increasingly oppressed native Infidels until they flee, convert to Islam, are murdered, or sink into despair under dhimmitude.
This period, in fact, is known as the “Islamic Golden Age”. If we want another “Golden Age”, we just have to let Islam conquer us.
The productive, wealthy West would make a rich corpse–one that ravening Muslims might live off for well over a century.
Jay Boo says
The MUZ Game of death.
Muslims impose themselves to attend mass and intimidate.
What they did was surveillance while attempting to stifle any criticism.
Reconnaissance and whisper control.
gravenimage says
Yes–this is sickening, Jay Boo. Muslims won’t even leave Infidels to mourn in peace, but invade our memorial services. *Ugh*.
rolf wittwer says
Probably just an exercise for coming steps towards the installation of their satanic insane “paradise”.
Neanderthaler idiots.
They want Civil War.
Westman says
They will have to up their game to get any attention by the French who now view this behavior as “normal”.
Time Magazine 2013: “Interior Minister Manuel Valls also revealed that figures provided by fire, police and insurance officials indicate that somewhere between 42,000 and 60,000 automobiles are intentionally torched in France every year. The majority of those go up in smoke in or near the disadvantaged suburban housing projects”
http://world.time.com/2013/01/03/in-france-nothing-says-happy-new-year-like-a-burning-car/
And it’s a regular New Years feature: http://pamelageller.com/2016/01/muslims-set-over-800-cars-ablaze-in-france-on-new-years-eve.html/
WorkingClassPost says
The poor migrants may have been upset because the bus drove past a shop selling bacon.
Budvarakbar says
Not in that neighborhood
Budvarakbar says
Probably Inspector Clouseau’s beat
Morag says
French censorship seems to be working well, as I haven’t seen a whisper of this anywhere else, nothing at all in the UK media, on Euronews or France 24.
Johan Elzinga says
I agree, and I tend to believe that this story is a hoax. A thorough search on the internet does not reveal any comments on facebook or other blogs, and that is very strange. If this event really DID happen, there should have been blog reports from people living nearby or being in the area at the time. There aren’t any. Liveleak seems to be the source of this report, I rather suspect the publication is a hoax.
Westman says
It’s just being ignored for the sake of tourism which is down by more than 10% in the past two years; the Bataclan and Nice terrorist attacks causing immediate cancellations for 2016.
Tourism brings in 11% of the French nation’s GDP and employs 3 million. I’m guessing that we’ll later discover the government asked for suppression of news that would damage the tourist industry.
pat says
Remember Facebook’s zuckerburg promised Merkel he would censor bad news rd refugees and he’s doing it & not just from Germany.
gravenimage says
Johan Elzinga wrote:
I agree, and I tend to believe that this story is a hoax.
…………………
And what about the video? Is that a “hoax”, as well? It’s posted by Stephanie, above.
What about the Daily Caller? Are they “punking” us, as well?
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/03/media-fails-to-report-gang-firebombing-paris-bus-while-yelling-allah-akbar/
If you don’t trust the English-language press, what about France’s own media?
Le Figaro:
“Un bus incendié dans une cité de Saint-Denis”
http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2016/07/28/97001-20160728FILWWW00329-un-bus-incendie-dans-une-cite-de-saint-denis.php
It was covered at France Bleu as well: “Un bus de la RATP incendié à Saint-Denis”. The story was also covered by Israel’s Arutz Sheva.
Why do you believe all of these trusted news sources are “hoaxing” us?
Mark Swan says
“punking” Good One gravenimage
Mark Swan says
Main Stream Media dose seem to be unwilling to show this, it was not on the
network TV news, that I know of.
gravenimage says
Thanks, Mark.
Lanya, I don’t think Johan is Muslim from his other comments here.
I think sometimes even some Anti-Jihadists just don’t *want* any of this to be true–that I do understand–so they just desperately hope that any reports of Jihad are somehow false.
Angemon says
Christmas and New Year came soon this year…
Ex-muslim says
Cowardly, decadent, pro-islam, disgusting, animalistic and Anti-Christ Western societies lack the spine to fight back against the barbarous islamic jihadists they keep supporting and favoring.
Angemon says
You sound cranky, EM. Oh, that’s right – no Westerner died so you couldn’t celebrate. Too bad – may it continue like that.
Champ says
The ever *pious* ex-muslim, whos’ anything BUT an “ex” muslim, relishes the thought that the West might be slaughtered at the hands of mohammedan savages. Wow what an evil perp …
And here are 6 things the Lord hates, many of which describe the self-righteous “ex muslim” …
Proverbs 6:16-19:
16 There are six things the Lord hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually, they *all* describe “ex-muslim” to a T!
Christianblood says
Champ
I disagree. All actually apply to the US policies in the ME.
Angemon says
Lying tongue? A heart that devises wicked schemes? A false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community? That’s CB, EM and the rest of the Western-hating gang.
Champ says
Of course “Christianblood” disagrees with me because he will defend ANYTHING written by this lowlife “ex-muslim.”
Champ says
Indeed, Angemon–agree 1000%!
gravenimage says
The appalling “Ex-muslim” wrote:
Cowardly, decadent, pro-islam, disgusting, animalistic and Anti-Christ Western societies lack the spine to fight back against the barbarous islamic jihadists they keep supporting and favoring.
……………………………..
Notice most of “Ex-muslim’s” ire is reserved for the *victims* of his (former?) coreligionists. No surprise–he has said here many times that he looks forward to the conquest of the West by Islam.
Christianblood says
Very well-said, (Ex-muslim)!
Trump was the only hope for America but Americans are siding with MB stealthy jihadist propagandist (Khizr Khan) to undermine Trump’s chances. They are undermining their own while siding with an stealthy muslim jihadist whose goal to destroy them. That is the kind of people they are!
Angemon says
Citations needed. Plus, a logic check: if Americans are the kind of people you claim they are, why would they need to be stealth about it?
More Ham Ed says
Christianblood says August 3, 2016 at 6:41 pm Trump was the only hope for America but Americans are siding with MB…
Quote “Americans” as in all Americans, again painting with a VERY BROAD brush, no detail, just daily blanket statements, no citations, no give-credit-where-credit-is-due. There’s no way CB is over age 19. For the 20th time,
LEAVE AND GO GET YOUR OWN WEST-HATING WEBSITE.
cbhatesthewest.com (he’s actually very envious, down in his mother’s russian basement).
ulfxx says
This was only fun for them.Some years ago they burned an old woman in a bus when there was a riot…
Norwegian says
Why was there not anyone there to beat the puke out of them?….???
Georg says
The question of the hour.
Budvarakbar says
1:00 AM in a 100% Muslim neighborhood — surely you jest!
Norwegian says
I like that actualy…
That they keep to their own infested parts of cities…
Imagine if they spread them out everywhere…
When we are going to deport them, they have done the job of rounding themselfes up for us…..so we just surround the infested places and make sure that the only way out is the train to the airport..or the docks. I guess you could rebuild a oiltanker to take LOTS of muslims home.
dsinc says
Shoot to kill.
Johan Elzinga says
noooo… the way this is handled here in Holland is that the meir will make an appointment to drink a cup of thee…
Johan Elzinga says
Great. It happened 9 am this morning. It’s 6 pm now in the Netherlands, but NO news about this in ANY dutch online newspaper. Or cnn. Or der Spiegel, die Welt, any french newspaper. Please respond to this message if a message about this appeared in any newspaper? I checked on the internet, it DID happen, it is certainly not a hoax. Today, at walking distance from the Paris bourse, there was a big gas explosion as well. No news about that either.
Norwegian says
Norwegian news silent as well…the last time I looked though.
They seem to be more obsessed with their stupid fantasies about Trump.
“He is loosing..”
“Now he has done it”
“He screwed up…”
“Now he made the people angry”
Yeah right….living in their own bubble as if liars still reigned supreme…
gravenimage says
This is *not* a hoax. Please read my post, above:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/muslims-screaming-allahu-akbar-firebomb-bus-in-paris/comment-page-1#comment-1494881
Resist says
France is destroyed. Europe about to fall. Still floods of thousands and thousands of iSSlamists coming in…..Sad sad story
gravenimage says
Dear Resist, your username is *Resist*. That is exactly what you should be doing, instead of counseling despair here.
Mark Swan says
Yes Absolutely
Johan Elzinga says
Shoot, I misread the article. This happened already on thursday last week… NOOO news in any media! Obviously, it’s not important news that buses are set on fire in our major cities by muslim extremists.
Georg says
Not only is it not important news– it’s racist.
G179 says
Looks just like the outskirts of Bagdad.
I’ts amazing that MSM completely ignored this.
These days you have to read Jihad Watch – the other news outlets simply won’t tell you the facts.
Johan Elzinga says
I tend to believe that this story is a hoax. A thorough search on the internet does not reveal any comments on facebook or other blogs, and that is very strange. If this event really DID happen, there should have been blog reports from people living nearby or being in the area at the time. There aren’t any. Liveleak seems to be the source of this report, I rather suspect the publication is a hoax.
Westman says
No Hoax. Le Figaronis is a leading Paris newpaper:
Headline: “A bus on fire in a city of Saint-Denis” (Un bus incendié dans une cité de Saint-Denis)
http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2016/07/28/97001-20160728FILWWW00329-un-bus-incendie-dans-une-cite-de-saint-denis.php
“Shortly before 01h in the morning in the city of Franc-Moisin, “a group of individuals has tended a trap to force the bus to stop”, reported a police source. They evacuated the five passengers and driver before throwing Molotov cocktails inside the bus and to escape”
You can guess for yourself, after listening to the video, about the religious persuasion of the “individuals”. The shouts of Allahu Ackbar have ruled out the Amish.
Johan Elzinga says
Wow. Thanks. Leaves the big question why this news was completely ignored by all other newspapers.
Budvarakbar says
So – what do you see in the video — ants firebombing a miniature paper bus?
Johan Elzinga says
No, but it could have from a different attack in some other country. Perhaps. At least, that was what I was thinking at first, because otherwise I would have been informed, wouldn’t I? After all this is Europe, so we do not have censorship? Or do we? Apparently we do. It shook me completely that this news was not reported.
gravenimage says
This story is *not* a hoax. It was also covered by France Bleu:
“Un bus de la RATP incendié à Saint-Denis”
https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/faits-divers-justice/un-bus-de-la-ratp-incendie-cette-nuit-saint-denis-1469699039
France Bleu is part of the national public broadcasting group Radio France.
This story even gives the address in Saint-Denis in front of which the bus was firebombed.
Georg says
Gee… A burnt out bus. Where have we seen that before?
gravenimage says
Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” firebomb bus in Paris
…………………………….
Note one important point here: Muslims are now setting up *roadblocks*–on the streets of the *City of Light*, as though it was in some stretch of potholed road in Dar-al-Islam.
Was anyone hurt? The article does not mention casualties, so I pray not.
As horrifying as this is, it could have been much, much worse. What if the next time the driver can’t get out before the bus is firebombed? What if next time the bus is full of passengers?
Budvarakbar says
IED’s right around the corner — enjoy – remember where they come from – Iran — flush with Obama bucks!
Myxlplik says
Apparently this isn’t news worthy, not even on the MSN online page yet.
I suppose they can’t figure out how to dissimulate nonIslamic explanations for this frequency of Jihad attacks, so they just stop reporting.
Kay says
Right. Trump must have been standing in front of the bus.
Sorry– the surrealness is getting to me.
Guest says
Yet another attack in the month of July.
overman says
ln the Daily Mail today:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3721819/They-want-loads-attacks-England-Germany-France-time-Former-jihadi-travelled-join-ISIS-Syria-reveals-terrorists-sent-home-wave-European-suicide-bombers.html
“They want loads of attacks in England, Germany and France at the same time’: Former jihadi who travelled to join ISIS in Syria reveals how terrorists sent him back home to be part of wave of European suicide bombers.
Former jihadi Harry Sarfo, 27, lived with ISIS in Syria for over three months
He claims extremists are turning recruits from Europe away from Syria
Adds they are being told to stay at home to launch fresh wave of attacks
Says terror group wants to unleash attacks in England, France and Germany at the same time”
Budvarakbar says
“Former jihadi Harry Sarfo, 27,”
Just what the hell is a “former jihadi”?
Mr. Happy says
France is a third world country.
abad says
Every single Muslim in Europe needs to be rounded up and deported to Saudi Arabia or Syria.
They simply do not belong in Europe.
Undaunted says
Once the unthinkable happens, it’s no longer unthinkable. So, whenever you read or hear of these outrageous modes of attack, put yourself in that situation and figure out what you’d do. Then, rehearse your plan in your head until it’s almost second-nature to you.
You’ll need that when it happens to you.
Alvin Woods says
I’ve started doing this, in public, look for escape rputes, objects that could be used as offensive defense weapons. Also im looking out for suspicious people.
Saw a guy a few days back, big heavy jacket, hood up. Its 90f outside and hes walking around.
In times of war you have to be on your watch.
gravenimage says
Important advice, Undaunted.
gary fouse says
Keep bringing in those Muslims, Hollande and Cazeneuve. They are really contributing to your glorious French society.
La Gloire!
Diganta Bhattacharya says
Europeans, and increasingly Americans are on the verge of watching their ENTIRE civilization wither and die, sucked into an abyss of medievalism. This is NOT empty rhetoric; this is plain and simple truth. The moment you decided, like the spineless Indian politicians, that you’d strike some kind of deal with the muslims, you’d ‘teach’ them the ways of the West, you’d render them more amenable to changes and liberalism, you were dead, DEAD. They are muslims. Vermin-s on this planet. Give them a chunk of space, and they’d turn that, within a couple of months, into an obnoxious, filthy, odorous, conservative hell like NOTHING you’ve seen! Come and see what they have done to my country! Imagine your body, insides, brain, intestinal details are being infested with Bot-fly eggs that’d sprout into life inside your body and kill you in the most painful way!
Your country, society is that body and you know who the bot flies are! But you also know how to kill flies, don’t you?
Kay says
Are you in India?
Diganta Bhattacharya says
Yes I am!
Mark Swan says
Diganta Bhattacharya thank You for Your heartfelt truth in the comment.
gravenimage says
Stay safe. We know the damage Mohammedans have done in beautiful India.
sham says
A Time for Peace, A Time for War
The word “Islam” is closely related to the word “salam or silm” which means peace. Muhammad, sallallahu alayhe wa sallam, himself had a very peaceful nature, was extremely tolerant, and highly protective of the non-Muslim minorities living in the Muslim state.
However, there are times when states find war inevitable, but Islam only permits war in specific and dire circumstances. It keeps warfare at a level of mercy and respect for the enemy that no other army has been able to reach. The Prophet sometimes had to fight for the mere survival of his people and message, but once their security was ensured, he immediately reverted to peace and diplomacy.
There is a rigid code Muslims must abide by in deciding when they can fight and how the fighting should be conducted. War itself is despised, and is only a last-resort option when all other attempts at peace have been made.
A Muslim is never allowed to initiate hostilities. “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but transgress not the limits. Surely, Allah likes not the transgressors.” [2: 190].
The only times in which believers are allowed to take up arms are when they are defending their own lives and the lives of their people, when they see the weak being oppressed in acts of tyranny, and when they are prohibited from practicing their religion:
“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.” [2: 191].
“They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing. And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can. And whoso be cometh a renegade and dieth in his disbelief: such are they whose works have fallen both in the world and the Hereafter, Such are rightful owners of the Fire: they will abide therein,” [2:217].
Aside from these circumstances, there is no legitimate fighting in Islam.
The conditions placed upon the soldier in battle are of utmost respect for the enemy and for human life. Islam makes a clear distinction between combatants and noncombatants, forbidding soldiers to harm defenseless civilian in any way. The Prophet said: “Do not kill the women, children, aged or the ill.” He also prohibited Muslims from harming monks in their monasteries or hermits in their caves. Cutting down trees, destroying livestock, wells, homes or land of the enemy is likewise forbidden. Upon seeing the corpse of a woman in a battlefield, Prophet Muhammad asked his companions why she had been killed, and condemned it.
There is no excuse for any expedition or attack resulting in the killing of civilians, no one has the right to take innocent lives.
For those enemies active in combat and those taken prisoner of war, the list of rights is lengthy. There is no torture, no killing of the wounded or defenseless, and the return of corpses to the enemy is honored. There is no mutilation of the enemy bodies. Even after Hind bint Utbah, a powerful lady of Makkah, chewed the liver of the Prophet’s uncle, Hamzah, after he was killed in a battle between Muhammad and her non-Muslim people, Muhammad still forbade his men from disrespecting a creation of God in such a way
The Prophet commanded the believers to treat the prisoners of war with kindness. One prisoner by the name of Abu Aziz told how surprised he was to see the Muslims giving the better part of their meal-the bread-to the prisoners while they themselves just had dates. “Not a crumb of bread would fall into their hands without them giving it to me,” he narrated, “and I would be so embarrassed that I would reject it. But then they would return it back to me.”
The Qur’an lays down strict guidelines for the declaration of war by a Muslim army, and Muslims are prohibited from breaching any treaty to which they have agreed.
“If you fear treachery from any people throw back (their covenant) to them (so as to be) on equal terms (that there will be no more covenant between you and them), Certainly Allah likes not the treacherous. [8:58].
The extent of the Prophet’s mercy can be seen in the Muslim conquest of Makkah, which happened towards the end of his life. The Makkan tribe of Quraish had blatantly violated the significant “Treaty of Hudaybiyya” by supplying men and arms in an effort to attack a Muslim-allied tribe. They had slaughtered ruthlessly, even killing inside the Holy Sanctuary, and knew they could expect retaliation for such a weighty crime.
Muhammad, upon learning of the raid, set out for Makkah at the head of a colossal army of 10,000 men. Everyone
wondered how he would conduct this expedition; if he wanted revenge for all the mockery, persecution, and murders of his companions, now was certainly the time. His forces humiliatingly outnumbered his enemies.
When the army reached the outskirts of Makkah, they came upon the chief of Quraish, the archenemy of Islam, Abu Sufvan. Several Muslims were furious and wished to see him dead, but the noble Prophet received him. Muhammad
asked his uncle, Abbas, to take Abu Sufyan ahead to a high gorge-giving him a full view of the Muslim army approaching Makkah.
The leader must have felt his heart leap to his throat as he watched group after group, tribe after tribe pass in front of him. Finally, he turned to ‘Abbas and asked incredulously, “Oh Abbas! Who are all these people?” Abbas’s reply was
plain and powerful: “This is the Apostle of Allah and his Companions.”
When Abu Sufyan approached the Prophet Muhammad begging for pardon and forgiveness, it was not revenge he heard coming from Muhammad’s blessed lips. Instead, the Prophet simply said: “He who takes refuge in Abu Sufyan’s house is safe; whosoever confines himself to his house, the people therein will be in safety; and he who enters the Sacred Mosque is safe.”
With these words Muhammad gave a full pardon and amnesty to the city of Makkah, and it was conquered in peace. To Wahshi, the murderer of Muhammad’s uncle Hamzah; a pardon. To Hind, who mutilated his body and chewed his liver, absolute clemency. To Habar, who had attacked the Prophet’s daughter so brutally that she eventually died, forgiveness.
After seeing this, the people started to accept Islam in crowds, as long before, God had promised Muhammad they would. ” When comes the Help of Allah (to you against your enemies) and conquest (of Makkah), And you see that the people enter Allah’s Religion (Islam) in crowds, So glorify the Praises of your Lord, and ask for His forgiveness. Verily, He is the One Who accepts the repentance and forgives”
[110:1-3].
As families were reunited and the Muslims celebrated being back in the sacred city, Muhammad had other things in mind. After offering prayers to God for the victory, he proceeded directly to the House of God, the Ka’bah, that had been polluted by the 360 man-made idols. The Prophet of God proceeded to knock them to the ground with his bow. As he did, he recited the Qur’anic verse: “And Say: Truth (Islamic Monotheism) has come and falsehood (Polythesm) has vanished. Surely! Falsehood is ever-bound to vanish.” [17:81].
“Al-Amin” returned to Madinah, where he spent the last years of his extraordinary life in worship and devotion to his Lord. He continued to stand in prayer for hours throughout the night until his ankles were swollen and his wife asked him to stop., but he did not.
Although he was a ruler of a vast empire in his last years, he continued to sleep on a modest straw mat, with no desire for carpets, or luxuries of any kind. He became ill and passed away in the arms of his wife, Aisha, at the age of 63. He left behind a stunning legacy, a blameless example and a religion that changed the world forever.
“Invite to the Way of your Lord with wisdom and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.”
Holy Qur’an 16:125
________________________________________
“Narrated Aishah (radhi-yallaahu ‘anhaa): The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said, “Do good deeds properly, sincerely and moderately, and receive good news because one’s good deeds will not make him enter Paradise.” They asked, “Even you, O Allah’s Messenger?” He said, “Even I, unless and until Allah protects me with His pardon and His Mercy.”
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, Hadith No. 474
________________________________________
gravenimage says
Spammer sham wrote:
A Time for Peace, A Time for War
…………………………………..
It’s always “time for war” whenever ravening Muslims think the Infidels are weak.
More:
The word “Islam” is closely related to the word “salam or silm” which means peace. Muhammad, sallallahu alayhe wa sallam, himself had a very peaceful nature, was extremely tolerant, and highly protective of the non-Muslim minorities living in the Muslim state.
…………………………………..
Just laughable. The “Prophet” Muhammed was a warlord who raped, enslaved, and slaughtered his victims. At one point he had up to 900 unarmed men and boys beheaded, then enslaved the tribe’s women and children.
More:
However, there are times when states find war inevitable, but Islam only permits war in specific and dire circumstances. It keeps warfare at a level of mercy and respect for the enemy that no other army has been able to reach. The Prophet sometimes had to fight for the mere survival of his people and message, but once their security was ensured, he immediately reverted to peace and diplomacy.
…………………………………..
Is that why Arabia no longer has any non-Muslims? And what could be more “merciful” than firebombing a civilian bus? Well, except for beheading infants, perhaps.
More;
There is a rigid code Muslims must abide by in deciding when they can fight and how the fighting should be conducted. War itself is despised, and is only a last-resort option when all other attempts at peace have been made.
…………………………………..
Muslims offer “peace” by demanding that Infidels submit to Islam. If we resist in any way–even non-violently–then it is time for Jihad. We see this all over the world.
More:
A Muslim is never allowed to initiate hostilities. “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but transgress not the limits. Surely, Allah likes not the transgressors.” [2: 190].
…………………………………..
What does this mean? It means that Infidels “initiate hostilities” simply by remaining unbelievers. Then we are fair game for any Muslim savagery.
More:
The only times in which believers are allowed to take up arms are when they are defending their own lives and the lives of their people, when they see the weak being oppressed in acts of tyranny, and when they are prohibited from practicing their religion:
…………………………………..
The last is what is important here. A civilized person might think that because the West has freedom of religion that this would not apply–but most civilized people do not understand that for Muslims to truly “practice their religion” that they must oppress and murder unbelievers.
More:
“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.” [2: 191].
…………………………………..
And what is “persecution”? For Muslims, it means anything that presents obstacles for the supremacy of Islam–such as allowing the Kuffar to live in freedom.
More:
“They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing…. [2:217].
…………………………………..
In other words, as long as we continue to disbelieve in the vicious deity “Allah”, we can be murdered with impunity.
More:
Aside from these circumstances, there is no legitimate fighting in Islam.
…………………………………..
Well, this is true! All we “filthy Infidels” need do is submit to Islam or die.
More:
The conditions placed upon the soldier in battle are of utmost respect for the enemy and for human life. Islam makes a clear distinction between combatants and noncombatants, forbidding soldiers to harm defenseless civilian in any way. The Prophet said: “Do not kill the women, children, aged or the ill.” He also prohibited Muslims from harming monks in their monasteries or hermits in their caves. Cutting down trees, destroying livestock, wells, homes or land of the enemy is likewise forbidden. Upon seeing the corpse of a woman in a battlefield, Prophet Muhammad asked his companions why she had been killed, and condemned it.
…………………………………..
Uh huh. And yet, just in the past few days, pious Muslims have mowed down festival-goers in Nice, attacked and murdered a pregnant woman with a machete, and beheaded a priest giving mass–this last whose church had given land to Muslims to build a Mosque.
If sham *really* took issue with any of this barbarism, he would be chiding his coreligionists for slaughtering civilians, rather than hectoring the good Infidels here at Jihad Watch.
More:
There is no excuse for any expedition or attack resulting in the killing of civilians, no one has the right to take innocent lives.
…………………………………..
Ah, but there’s the rub–Muslims do not consider *any* Infidel to be “innocent”.
More:
For those enemies active in combat and those taken prisoner of war, the list of rights is lengthy. There is no torture, no killing of the wounded or defenseless, and the return of corpses to the enemy is honored. There is no mutilation of the enemy bodies. Even after Hind bint Utbah, a powerful lady of Makkah, chewed the liver of the Prophet’s uncle, Hamzah, after he was killed in a battle between Muhammad and her non-Muslim people, Muhammad still forbade his men from disrespecting a creation of God in such a way
…………………………………..
Given that the “Prophet” had a fire kindled on the chest of a man who had dared to hide his people’s treasure, and had an elderly lady who dared criticize Islam’s violence drawn and quartered by tying her to camels, this “respect” seems a bit equivocal…
More:
The Prophet commanded the believers to treat the prisoners of war with kindness.
…………………………………..
At one point, Muhammed actually *sneered at* his thug followers for *not* raping their captives. At one point, he had a woman killed because she could not stop screaming in horror at the massacre of all the men of her tribe. Again, the concept of “kindness” here becomes rather meaningless.
More:
One prisoner by the name of Abu Aziz told how surprised he was to see the Muslims giving the better part of their meal-the bread-to the prisoners while they themselves just had dates. “Not a crumb of bread would fall into their hands without them giving it to me,” he narrated, “and I would be so embarrassed that I would reject it. But then they would return it back to me.”
…………………………………..
Uh huh. No mention here of female captives being distributed as booty, the enslavement of captives, and the murder of those deemed un-useful.
More:
The Qur’an lays down strict guidelines for the declaration of war by a Muslim army, and Muslims are prohibited from breaching any treaty to which they have agreed.
“If you fear treachery from any people throw back (their covenant) to them (so as to be) on equal terms (that there will be no more covenant between you and them), Certainly Allah likes not the treacherous. [8:58].
…………………………………..
This passage actually contradicts itself–it says that Muslims can “throw back”–i.e., break–any treaty that if the “fear” treachery. In other words, they may break treaties at any time they like.
Moreover, the Caliphate does not have any treaties with Infidels now–instead, the Islamic State tells their followers to slaughter Infidels with impunity.
More:
The extent of the Prophet’s mercy can be seen in the Muslim conquest of Makkah…
…………………………………..
What sort of “mercy” did the people of Constantinople find? When the Muslim hordes overran the Hagia Sophia cathedral, they mass raped those who had taken sanctuary there–women, children, the elderly, priests, and nuns. They enslaved the able bodied, and slaughtered those they could not use.
*That* is how Muslims treat those they conquer.
More:
Although he was a ruler of a vast empire in his last years, he continued to sleep on a modest straw mat, with no desire for carpets, or luxuries of any kind. He became ill and passed away in the arms of his wife, Aisha, at the age of 63. He left behind a stunning legacy, a blameless example and a religion that changed the world forever.
…………………………………..
What could be more “blameless” than having raped little Aisha at the age of nine? Well, besides his being a pedophile, he was a war-lord, caravan-raider, slaver, and mass-murderer. Only Mohammedans consider this hideous list of crimes “blameless”.
More:
“Invite to the Way of your Lord with wisdom and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.”
Holy Qur’an 16:125
…………………………………..
What is sham doing here? Why, he is “inviting us to Islam”–if we decline taking him up on it, that means he can attack us.
More:
“Narrated Aishah (radhi-yallaahu ‘anhaa): The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said, “Do good deeds properly, sincerely and moderately, and receive good news because one’s good deeds will not make him enter Paradise.” They asked, “Even you, O Allah’s Messenger?” He said, “Even I, unless and until Allah protects me with His pardon and His Mercy.”
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, Hadith No. 474
…………………………………..
What are “good deeds” in Islam? Not what we would think. The greatest of “good deeds” in Islam is waging Jihad in the “path of Allah”–in other words, murdering us Infidels.
Mark Swan says
gravenimage—Thank You for taking the time to break down and translate
this demonic spew, that Sham’s damaged mind clings to—it is more important
to hear it when properly unraveled by the truth, than one might think.
If one just took it on face value—they could not really see the incredible deceitfulness
Muslims practice as a way of life.
Kay says
I agree. Thank you gravenimage.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Mark and Kay.
Champ says
“sham” is a LIAR …
Here are the facts:
The Basics of Islam 4: Robert Spencer on the Violent Verses in the Qur’an
In this fourth segment of his Basics of Islam series, Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer discusses the verses of the Qur’an that command Muslims to commit acts of violence against non-Muslims.
gravenimage says
Thanks for posting that, Champ.
Kay says
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html
More than 250 million PEOPLE killed through history.
Woe (judgment is coming) to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
gravenimage says
Yes–the toll of Islam has been greater than any evil in the history of the world.
Richard Paulsen says
Countries being victims having most muslims. Any conclusion Democrats, CNN et al?
Should.
Mark Swan says
Good Point Richard Paulsen
Vivarto says
Nothing in the news about this!
mortimer says
The leftarded cultural Marxists want a theoretical utopia and use the terrorists to distabilize the real world we have that they wish to destroy… they merely fall into the hands of bankers who want to lend more money to governments. The people are buying ‘hope’ from the politicians who take money from the people and hand it over in interest charges to the mega-rich bankers.
Mark says
Are the authorities still trying to figure out a motive?
Iftikhar Ahmad says
Allahu Akbar is an Arabic phrase which translates directly as “Allah is Greater” but is often mistranslated in the media as “God is great”
Muslims and Arabic speaking Orthodox Christians recite it as an expression of their faith
The phrase serves as a reminder that no matter the situation or emotion, God is always greater
It is one of the most commonly used phrases in Islam and has a multitude of meanings
Uttered during ritualistic prayer where Muslims face the Kaaba in Mecca
Recited in the call to prayer heard from the minarets of mosques
It is considered a form of applause and can be spoken in union as a way of showing approval
Said in times of distress, to express joy, following births or deaths and during Islamic festivals
When 18-year-old Reshma Begum was pulled alive from rubble, after the Savar building collapse in Bangladesh, rescuers cried “Allahu Akbar” to commemorate the miracle
Prominent on the flag of Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan
This peaceful phrase has been warped by Islamic extremists
Terrorists have shouted it before committing mass murder – linking it to fear and destruction
Suspected 9/11 hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta wrote in a document found in his luggage: “Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”
Witnesses of the Paris attacks reported hearing several attackers shouting the term
Allegedly first used as a battle cry during the Battle of Badr by the Prophet Muhammad
Used during the Iranian revolution in 1979 by protesters
It was shouted during the Arab Spring by demonstrators
Was the name of a marching song for the Egyptian Army during the Suez Canal War in 1956
From 1977 to 2011 it was the national anthem of the Libyan Arab Republic, chosen by Muammar Gaddafi