Is Saudi Arabia trying to manipulate the U.S. presidential election? My latest in FrontPage:
Are the Saudis trying to make sure that the candidate of their choice is elected President of the United States this November?
Khizr Khan is more than just the father of slain Muslim U.S. serviceman Humayun Khan and the mainstream media’s flavor of the moment in its ongoing efforts to demonize and destroy Donald Trump. As far as the Obama administration and Hillary campaign are concerned, he is a living validation of the success of their strategy against “extremism”: by refusing to identify the enemy as having anything to do with Islam, they draw moderate Muslims to their side and move them to fight against terrorism. By contrast, Trump, in their view, alienates these moderates and drives them into the arms of the terrorists.
That all sounds great. There’s just one catch: Khizr Khan, and the Clinton campaign, have extensive ties to the Saudis – far more extensive than any possible connection that Donald Trump’s campaign may have had to Russia’s alleged involvement in the leak of emails that revealed that the entire Democratic Party presidential nominating process was rigged from the start. Not that the mainstream media will pause from speculating about Trump and the Russians long enough to tell you any facts about Khizr Khan, Hillary and the Saudis.
Intelius records that Khizr Khan has worked at Hogan Lovells Llp. According to the Washington Free Beacon, “Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign.”
The Free Beacon added that the Saudi government has “supplied the Clinton Foundation with millions. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million.”
And so we were treated to the spectacle of an employee of a firm that is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia lambasting Donald Trump at the Democratic National Convention, and then (lo and behold!) becoming a media darling as he excoriates Trump for his “black soul.”
Might the government of Saudi Arabia, which has spent countless bullions of dollars spreading the virulent and violent Wahhabi strain of Islam around the world, have any interest in making sure that a presidential candidate who speaks more forthrightly about the Islamic terror threat than any presidential candidate has since John Quincy Adams, and who has vowed to take concrete steps to counter that threat, is defeated? Is that why Khizr Khan, brimming with self-righteous indignation and misleading disinformation about the relationship of Islamic jihad terrorism to Islam, was not only featured at the Democratic National Convention but has dominated the news cycle ever since?
This has gone on long enough. The 28-page section of the 9/11 report detailing Saudi involvement in the September 11, 2001 jihad attacks were just finally released (albeit with substantial portions still redacted), after being kept classified for fifteen years by one President who held hands with the Saudi King and another who bowed to him. And for fifteen years, the U.S. has done little or nothing to free itself from dependence upon Saudi oil and develop alternative energy sources. Why not? We know the Saudis have kept the Clintons’ palms abundantly greased. Who else’s?
The big story of foreign influence in this presidential election is not some vague imaginings about the Russians supposedly hacking Democratic National Committee emails showing the Democrats engaged in indisputably unethical behavior. The real foreign influence story in this election involves the Saudis and the Democrats. Saudi influence in Washington must end. Khizr Khan represents an all-out effort by the mainstream media and the Democratic Party establishment to maintain that influence. In light of that, Donald Trump was right to answer his attacks, and should have been even stronger in his responses. It’s time for the United States of America to regain its independence.

sahani says
it looks like hillary is well connected with saudis too . no wonder he was on DNC stage . Hillary need to be investigated threat to USA.
Christianblood says
Khizr Khan is an stealthy jihadist connected to the Saudis. He is comparable but more effective stealthy jihadist than the ground zero imam and he is enjoying the huge backing of the US politically-correct, pro-islamic establishment elites in both parties.
Angemon says
Citations needed.
Ex-muslim says
@ Christianblood
You are right. John McCain, the lizard-faced Lindsey Graham, Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan and many many other US dhimmis are siding the Pakistani stealthy jihadist and opposing Donald Trump.
O’ HOW MUCH I HATE THEM! THEY ARE SO DISGUSTING!
Peter says
I agree with you brother .There are lot of traitors amongst us!
Kay says
Please all readers, send this post to your Senators and Congressmen. Also, send it to any others you have time for: pastors, college professors, city governments.
I see that MSM is still beating out the story over Trump’s “boorishness” regarding the Khans. But maybe together we can help this get the light of day.
mortimer says
Hill-liar-y is participating in espionage against the US and should be in jail.
Carmel says
According to SHOeBAT.COM Khizr Khan is a MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD agent.
It take care of it .
jihad3tracker says
Hello Carmel — HERE IS A PARAGRAPH IN THE LONG ARTICLE AT THAT WEBSITE YOU MENTION:
“WAMY is the World Association of Muslim Youth which was created through the collaboration of the Wahhabist and Muslim Brotherhood led by Said Ramadan who was, again, the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton’s aid) and her parents Sayed Z. Abedin (father) and Saleha Mahmoud Abedin (mother). It was also financed by the wealthy Abdullah Omar Naseef, another boss of the Abedin family who was an Al-Qaeda financier”
NOTICE THE NAME OF HUMA ABEDIN — HILLARY’S TOP AIDE FOR MANY YEARS AND AN ESSENTIAL PERSON ON THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ORGANIZATION.
I WILL GIVE THE SOURCE TO THAT ENTIRE ARTICLE IN ANOTHER COMMENT HERE. Please copy it in an email that you send to your federal senators and representatives — especially those who serve on national security committees.
KHIZR KHAN DID NOT JUST INNOCENTLY HAPPEN TO LAND ONSTAGE AT THE DEMOCRAT’S CONVENTION.. He was carefully selected by Huma Abedin as bait for Trump — and, being a guy who knows he personally bears no blame for the son’s combat death (Muslims are the ones who killed the son) Trump got pissed off.
WE MUST SHRED THIS “VICTIM OF ISLAMOPHOBIA” MYTH THAT MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS SCREAMING. If every reader here contacts our elected Republican officials who are concerned about DEFENSE OF THE U.S. AGAINST DOMESTIC JIHAD, there is a good chance of waking them up.
By the way, it would be even more effective if you also CALL the district office within the state you live in, ask to speak to the chief of staff there, get his name, and DIRECT THAT EMAIL TO HIM. Tell him what it will be about, and include that subject in your email subject box.
jihad3tracker says
For some reason I cannot figure out, when I post a link to the specific article on Khizr Khan, it does not appear.
So here is an alternative: go to www [dot] shoebat [dot] com and find that item — you cannot miss it — it is at the front currently.
Then send that link on to your federal senators and representatives.
Kay says
Good advice, jihad3tracker. Thanks.:
“By the way, it would be even more effective if you also CALL the district office within the state you live in, ask to speak to the chief of staff there, get his name, and DIRECT THAT EMAIL TO HIM. Tell him what it will be about, and include that subject in your email subject box.”
To Democrats as well. (Maybe some of them will think about switching parties? Or might vote outside of party lines?)
Kay says
Good advice, jihad3tracker. Thanks.:
<>
Democrats too. Some might be ready to vote against party lines.
Christianblood says
Carmel posted
(..According to SHOeBAT.COM Khizr Khan is a MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD agent..)
That is right. He is an stealthy jihadist with tie and he is being backed by the traitorous US political establishment elites and media. He is an agent of Evil unfolding before our eyes and he is succeeding the jihadist goal of destroying America from within.
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“That is right. He is an stealthy jihadist with tie and he is being backed by the traitorous US political establishment elites and media.”
Citations needed.
Richard Paulsen says
Should not Saudi-Arabia and other wealthy arab countries help starving people in the developing world as well as stopping the ISIS? Instead of looking for influence in the U.S.A. and Europe.
A lot of money being spent on building mosques and investing in non-muslim countries. Neglecting the developing world. Leaving that to the developed world.
PJG says
SA etc are not about “helping” anyone but themselves and the growth of Islam.
The spread of Islam to the entire Western world means slaves and wealth and the triumph of Allah.
The only help they will give the developing world is in return for conversion to Islam. If poor countries are already Islamised, they can be ignored…the job is done.
Son of the West says
There is a story out there now that Khan has said he wants out of the media spotlight. His reason for this is that he claims just to be a private citizen who wants to return to his normal life. It is clear the real reason he wants out of the spotlight is that more and more dirt is going to come trickling out about him, showing that he perhaps is not as innocent as he seems.
Khan is really just an example of Islamic deceit. Play the victim, claim that others are trying to persecute you, when you have made sacrifices, but really you are a snake in the grass. Trump’s response was ham fisted, but his instincts were right about this guy. I know nothing of Khan’s son, but I would be there were a few heated exchanges about him fighting against other Muslims.
Sad spectacle all around, and speaks volumes about the Democratic party that they would put this guy on stage.
ECAW says
Yes, it would be nice for it all to come out but will the MSM do their job? There seems to be two populations developing, those who get their information from the MSM and those who get it from the web, much like the Soviet citizens who read Pravda or the samizdat.
eagle says
Khizr Khan’s business is to profit from the American taxpayer with Obama passing Khizr Khan the money. Khizr Khan’s business is to spew garbage and Taqiyya from his mouth to sound convincing. Khizr Khan is all Taqiyya. This scum of life would kill his own child to show his allegiance to his Allah. Khizr Khan is mentally ill and should be given a one way ticket back to Pakistan. Khizr Khan and CAIR with Obama’s support will bilk the American people of taxpayers money. Khizr Khan’s family will be well compensated and move back to Pakistan. It is sad to think our own American wounded solders will not receive the compensation this Muslim family will get. We have an ISIS supporter in the oval office and congress is totally blind to this.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Son of the West.
MTMLA says
I heard that when more details about him came out and that he had a website to bring in and legalize muslims, he took away the website, it is gone…
PJG says
It also speaks volumes about the Democrats that they are confident their supporters will not care about what information comes out about Khan.
ECAW says
“for fifteen years, the U.S. has done little or nothing to free itself from dependence upon Saudi oil and develop alternative energy sources”
The US government may not have done much but good old capitalist innovation seems to have responded to the point where the Saudis stratagem of low oil prices is hurting themselves more than the West:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/07/31/texas-shale-oil-has-fought-saudi-arabia-to-a-standstill/
Angemon says
This *despite* Obama.
ICH says
It makes me sad that the great country of America is beholding to Saudis.
What a shame.
I would expect if from Canada.
But not the USA.
MTMLA says
USA= Under Saudi Arabia. Sad but true, thanks to traitor sell out politicians…
Frank Livingston says
I cannot stand the sight of anyone that worships a pedophile!
Berq says
Khan,s son died when he was paying his duty in the US army in middle east What about the other American Christian soldiers who died in the war. Why Muslim solder is more important then his fellow country man? Its forbidden in Islam that a Muslim died for a kafir.The truth is this that Khans son was paying his duty as a normal solder so why this is all fuss about .How Khan and his son can be loyal to a kafir country being a Muslim?We can never know their loyalties and their is a mountain of evidences’ that they are corrupt ,treacherous ,cowardly, and deceiver.
Champ says
Excellent comment, Berg!
vivienne Leijonhufvu (@goldaleijonhufv) says
To a dumb broad like me this has been obvious since 1979, I am astonished the world is only just waking up. Where the hell did people think the money came from from all these bloody mosques world wide. I could go on but what is the point. WAHHABI islam has been spreading like wild fire since 1979 and not a damn thing was/has been done about it. Ever the stupid British Royal family pay homage to this bunch of tribesman with too much money BULLIONS is the right noun!
TH says
The fact is that Saudi Arabia has been involved in a petroleum price war with the intention of harming and even destroying the U.S.’s best chance to achieve energy independence, that is by the fracking method, plus causing great damage to Russia also. If Trump wins normalizes relations with Russia, plus publish all the shenanigans of the Saudis, that will be a great thing.
Dov Berrol says
Robert,
On the topic of the leftist romance with Arab countries, you absolutely must read this opinion piece by Seth Frantzman:
“Why Western leftists adore right-wing religious extremists abroad”
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Why-Western-leftists-adore-right-wing-religious-extremists-abroad-462978
DP111 says
Father of deceased Muslim US soldier asks Trump ‘Have you even read the US Constitution?’
But does Khan, a good Muslim, believe that Sharia is Allah’s law, must be supreme everywhere including over the US constitution? So is he a good Muslim or an Apostate?
Jack Diamond says
He is a lawyer who, in Saudi Arabia, co-counded the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law and authored “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law” in which he invoked Said Ramadan as an authority (son-in-law of Hasan al-Banna and key figure in the Brotherhood). He is a good Muslim, as you call it.
Judging from the work he authored in 1983, he is strictly orthodox. Shari’a is fixed, not open to “reform”(from the Shoebat article):
“the structure of Islamic law-the Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited…to Muslims, the Qur’an being the very word of God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation. It is also, to them, the first and everlasting miracle of Muhammad’s prophethood.”
As for the Constitution, the “no religious test” does not apply to the immigration of non-citizens. They can be restricted for any reason we deem necessary, certainly for matters of security. No one has the “right” to emigrate to America.
Jay Boo says
What a staged farce.
We are now to believe that a Muslim using taqiyya prop cares about the Constitution ahead of Sharia (Lefties love to eat this up)
Hillary wants to put Sharia law ahead of The Constitution and to permanently abolish both the First & Second Amendments altogether.
MTMLA says
I would love to remind Trump that while Hitllery was chief of State, she was in a meeting in Turkey with several heads of muslim countries, and the purpose of this meeting was to pass a global law prohibiting and criminalizing any criticism of islam.
Don Rutter says
Obama/Clinton stated to the UN that they are on target for reigning in world UN government. This is Sharia compliant and does not acknowledge Christianity. This will naturally cause a holy war in America.The constitution is completely 100% nullified under this new gov. Citizens must be disarmed to be in compliance with the UN. This world UN government is the main influence on why Obama makes the decisions he is making. It will allow millions and millions of muslims to take over America.
gravenimage says
Thanks, Jack.
Northern Virginiastan says
Obama wasn’t merely bowing to the Saudi king, he was genuflecting.
Steve Klein says
I did not vote for Obama. I voted for Bush in 2000. Sadly, there are pictures of Mr. Bush (not merely holding hands with but) kissing Abdullah bin Abdulaziz.
MTMLA says
I saw that too. Can’t stand the man. He’s a traitor and a liar and a sell out in my eyes. I think he’s hitting the bottle again. Watch the youtube video of him dancing like a fool during the funeral of the 5 policemen. The Obamas were smiling too, but Laura was trying to control the drunk fool. How embarrassing! He’s looking bad also, aged a lot. Maybe its the booze or guilt….if he has any concience…
Steve Klein says
Lots of people are referring to Walid Shoebat’s piece yesterday linking Mr. Khan to the Muslim Brotherhood. I notice Mr. Spencer does not refer to Shoebat and his work in this article. In my busyness, I can only read so many counter-jihad websites. I am not a regular Shoebat reader.
Yesterday, I posted a link at The Hill to Shoebat’s Khan piece (“What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States”) and was immediately met with a “Shoebat is a fraud” response with a link. Clearly Mr. Khan wants to bring more Muslims into the United States.
Because I have been reading Spencer (Jihad Watch and his books) over the years I can respond to attacks on his credibility. Not so Shoebat. Anyone hear a regular Shoebat reader? I try to be very careful who I cite and what website I source, whether I can stand behind it or not.
Jack Diamond says
Shoebat is not the only source here, he often has valuable information not least because he is Arabic-speaking and knows the region well, but as a source he is controversial because he is a controversial character with controversial opinions. This article’s source is the Washington Free Beacon & Intelius on the Saudi connection to Mr. Khan. No one is going to question those sources. I quoted earlier from the document Khan authored, as presented at Shoebat, but that document too is up elsewhere:
http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hujil6&div=7&id=&page=
Steve Klein says
I am not too worried about controversial characters with controversial opinions. I have (most of us who are concerned about the global jihad have) controversial opinions. I wonder if he is a straight shooter. Robert Spencer has controversial opinion but he is very careful how he presents the facts, lest he be accused of misleading the reader.
I understand Snopes a left-leaning (pro- Barack Obama) outfit. Snopes and other critics charge Shoebat with playing fast and loose with the facts:
http://www.snopes.com/khizr-khan-is-a-muslim-brotherhood-agent/
“…The Shoebats went on to cite two papers written by Khan in 1983 and 1984 pertaining to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, described as “an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries” and a second titled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law” (both of which were written prior to the family’s move to the United States). With respect to the latter, Shoebat bracketed a not-present “Sharia” in the title and included a snapshot of the only page of the paper freely available (which in no part suggested support for Sharia law or membership in the Muslim brotherhood and appeared to be an academic piece, not an advocacy paper). The Shoebats maintained that in the paper “Khan shows his appreciation for the icon of the Muslim Brotherhood,” referencing a citation holding that “The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is greatly acknowledged.”
The elided citation was offered as support of the assertion that Khan’s work was undersigned by the “Saudi Wahhabist religious institution” and cited a “recent report” that Khan had moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, “a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood.”….
However, the quoted text was suspiciously elided from the screenshot that appeared on Shoebat and looked far less damning in its actual context as an academic footnote:
The Shoebats’ insinuations about the younger Khan directly conflict with all other published accounts about him. Had Humayun’s intent in joining the Army been one of sabotage, there would be no reason to expect he’d ultimately lay down his life to stop a suicide bomber from killing scores of other American soldiers — yet by every telling, that is exactly how Capt. Humayun Khan died.
The other big “smoking gun” Shoebat cited to support their theory that Khzir Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood operative is his work as an immigration lawyer. By their rationale, Khan bears a grudge against Donald Trump for the candidate’s myriad statements about Muslims and immigration — but although it’s true that Khzir Khan and his sons were Muslims immigrants to the United States, none of the “evidence” presented by Shoebat remotely supported the idea that Khan is an operative of the Muslim brotherhood.
Not only were most of the points made about Khan by Shoebat unrevealing and tenuous, the heroic death of Humayun Khan flies in the face of claims the family were Muslims operatives seeking to harm Americans or work against U.S. interests. Capt. Khan enlisted in the U.S. Army by choice and died protecting his fellow soldiers; by contrast, the only “evidence” linking his family to the Muslim Brotherhood are irrelevant, decades-old papers written about OPEC and Islamic law by Khzir Khan before he immigrated to America.
Jack Diamond says
Khan worked for a company that is an agent for Saudi Arabia. Khan is an immigration lawyer with a direct interest in continued Muslim immigration. Khan lived in Saudi Arabia and wrote about shari’a. Islamic Law, Muslim Law, and Shari’a are interchangeable terms. Implying Shoebat was doing something shady by bracketing Shari’a with Islamic Law is really reaching. Yes, it was decades ago. Did his thinking change since?
I posted another link to Khan’s paper on {Shari’a} showing the title page, you have to pay to read the entire document. I choose not to pay and actually trust the screenshots are accurate. In fact, the facing page in my link notes clearly “the contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is gratefully acknowledged.” Anyone familiar with Ramadan, an important Muslim Brotherhood figure, can make an inference about Mr. Khan’s influences, whether Khan is an “operative” or not. His Clinton connections, Saudi connections, and possible intermingling with the (Huma) Abdein family and patrons (alleged by Shoebat), are not yet established but intriguing given how he has been used by this campaign. The death of the son hardly exonerates the father or explains the use he is making of his son’s death. To make resistance to jihad (and shari’a) something shameful and a hate crime against Muslims.
Whatever else Shoebat said, ask him about it, I don’t answer for him.
Jack Diamond says
refer to the more recent Khan piece at JW from Breitbart:
“he (Khan) spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation.” Khan has also deleted the website of his immigration law firm.
خَليفة says
Khan is a Con.
WorkingClassPost says
Here in UK, if one party paraded the parents of a dead soldier for political propaganda, I’m fairly sure that the media would go apeshit about it, still.
This was certainly the case in the past and probably now.
It was very bad taste, and for the father to use the death of his own son, as political capital, speaks volumes about the differences between islam and our Western culture.
Trump was human to be angry, but he will need a thicker skin to be a successful politician.
It was muslims that killed their son, and while he may be seen as heroic, it’s only a few weeks since another ‘heroic’ muslim ex-serviceman went on a cop killing spree, and there have been many foiled plots by these guys too.
They could have just brought clockboy back for an encore, or is he starring on stage somewhere else?
duh swami says
How did Khan find his way to the DNC stage? Did he call Debbie, or did Debbie call him? Who suggested Mr Kjan and who wrote his speech? It was good theater for mad men only. the sane are not buying it…
Jack Diamond says
I would suggest Huma Abedin found him. Khan and the Abedin family seem to intersect.
common sense says
My first clue was Abedin, Hillary’s handler and a bogus aide. Laila Alawa as an ‘advisor’ to the DHS who gets away with hate speech and 10’s of millions from the Saudi’s to the Clinton machine. Infiltrations well under way Obama is highly successful for anyone but a white Christian American, low income workers and no income citizens on the teat of welfare and he loves rubbing everyone’s face in it. Hillary gets to vindicate the demorats some more…..unless.
Jay Boo says
I believe that a Muslim campaign donor said to Hillary, “can you hire her for your staff?”.
Hillary walked (out of her closet) took one look at Huma Abedin and was forever hooked.
Anke L. says
Would someone please send all this information to the Trump camp, so they can have solid evidence on what is going on.
eur says
Mr an Mrs kHAN :
It is easy to understand .. if you are Muslims can not be Western . You may be good people .. but your values , culture , ideology … is contrary to the individual and collective freedom . If there were many Muslims in the West freedom that you enjoy .. not exist.
I’m sorry but the truth is : Islam and Muslims , you included , must leave the West.
Abu Maven says
Robert,
I’m often in agreement with you, but this one is a stretch. Hogan Lovells is one of the largest law firms in the world, with thousands of employees. The fact that it does work for KSA does not remotely support the argument that every one of its employees is somehow an agent of KSA, let alone someone who worked in the IT department.
Edward says
‘Captain Humayun Khan: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know’
http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/humayun-khan-khizri-army-captain-son-speech-video-watch-democratic-national-convention-muslim-soldier-iraq-trump/
The truthful other-side of the story: The possible Khan family irony!
Why young Muslims line up to die: A muslim’s death wish:
Are the Khan’s eligible to be “A Gold Star Family”; when young muslim’s cultural INNATE PROPENSITIES are to become MARTYRS for other obvious reason?? That, by not becoming; heroes in saving the lives of INFEDELS/Non-Believers!
As an example:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/08/17/martyr.culture/index.html
“It’s a martyr’s death I am looking for,” Amrozi said during his trial in Denpasar, following the October Bali nightclub blasts.
Edward says
Food for thought:
Should Captain Humayun Khan be considered an apostate (according to sharia law) for stepping into harm’s way to save the lives of his outfit members, who BTW are most likely INFIDELS?
Or did Captain Humayun Khan, chose the opportunity to become a martyr to comply with the quran’s ideology tenant’s rewards of gaining the path to paradise – were the 72 virgins are waiting for his arrival?
A videoed debate about this question:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5068364098001/should-khizr-khans-patriotism-be-questioned/?#sp=show-clips
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Khizr Khan’s Saudi Ties
…………………..
This story just keeps getting worse.
Peter says
Another Leftist/Islamist “kahn job” on the American people.
Peter Ahlskog says
I don’t understand all mess in American politics. But isn’t captain Khan just one out of million Muslims killed by other Muslims? And why did he step forward to the bombcar as only soldier at that base?
As far as I understand, Khan had been alive today with Trump as president instead of Obama.
However, I don’t think that Trump alone can decide about putting Muslims behinds walls and barbed wire in an enormous Islam zone around Middle East and North Africa. This must be decided by a world council representing all non-Muslim countries. Because every non-Muslim country has big problems with them, and if not, they can try some years together with Muslim refugees corresponding 5% of that countries population. It would be over 10 million Muslims in Japan for instance, then they can vote about Muslims behind walls or not.
Why is this so wrong? It means no more killings, No more terrorism. No more Muslim youths in Western city ghettos without future. To make the Muslims safer behind the walls, zones for different groups can be built. We will have no contact with them, they cannot contact us, no trade, no speaking. We take all weapons and Western and East Asian technology like computers and I-pods from them, and give them all water, tools, seeds and animals they need for farming and building their own societies instead of allowing this basically tribe people to rob more advanced civilizations as they have done already long before Mohamed.
They can choose whatever system they want inside the walls. Let them live with sharia if they want. Let them prove Islams supremacy without help from West and East Asia. Let’s see if they can build a great, peaceful civilization alone.
And we, in the rest of the world, shall learn to live without oil and such shit, and make the technological progress we had seen decades ago without the oil dependency. All non-Muslims must, of course, leave the Muslim land. USA and other countries have to close down all military bases and installations.
Without Muslims outside the walls we can take away most of the security checks on airports again. Just imagine that.
Don Rutter says
Muslims are incompatible with non-muslim culture. period. There is no arguing this matter, we already know this .They aren’t legally allowed to immigrate to America anyway under article 414 of the supreme court. The fly in the ointment though , is corrupt politicians and their thirst for oil and political contributions. Those contributions are given solely as insurance for muslims to perpetrate jihad on the US.
Champ says
Khizr Khan’s Saudi Ties
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most telling! Hope Donald Trump brings this up when he debates HilLIAR Clinton.
Ted says
If Mr. Kahan is so concerned about resettling his fellow Muslims, why doesn’t he convince his patrons- Saudi Arabia- to take them in!!!!!!!!!
Rita says
Is Saudi Arabia trying to manipulate the U.S. presidential election?
Of course they are. And not only the US elections, they have their dirty fingers also in the upcoming French elections, whose “socialist” government – and the Paris Mayor work for them against the real French people and patriots.
duh swami says
According to reports, Russia and France are also exerting influence…The more they gear Donald, the better I like him…
mortimer says
Vote for Saudi Arabia! Vote for Hill-liar-y.
davej says
Given the fact that many Muslim youth aspire to a martyr’s death to further advance the Islamic effort at world domination and given the facts about his father’s Saudi connections, is it possible that the son was encouraged to join the kuffar military and find a “heroic” way to die, one that can subsequently be turned into a publicity stunt to benefit the Saudi funded Presidential candidate?
Speculation – but didn’t all the other soldiers escape while he ran towards the attacking bomb car?
Edward says
The Donald Trump campaign should ponder on this particular comment as well all other articles found in Jihadwatch.org. Great SAGACITY can garner great wisdom from them. I would like to see Mr. Donald Trump organization team up with Mr.Robert Spencer’s team! The great TRUTH GENERATORS!
eagle says
You have my vote for this one..
Gary Devouges says
Me too…. Me too….. Me too !! !
Gary Devouges says
Well, as far as I am concerned, he did not sacrifice ANYTHING or ANYBODY. A sacrifice is the act of giving up something that you want to keep especially in order to get or do something else or to help someone. : an act of killing a person or animal in a religious ceremony as an offering to please a god. : a person or animal that is killed in a sacrifice.
I do not believe that HE made the decision that his son get enrolled in the military and got killed.
Edward says
Think again Gary:
“Why young Muslims line up to die: A muslim’s death wish”:
“Are the Khan’s eligible to be “A Gold Star Family”; when young muslim’s cultural INNATE PROPENSITIES are to become MARTYRS for other obvious reason?? That, by not becoming; heroes in saving the lives of INFIDELS/Non-Believers!”
As an example:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/08/17/martyr.culture/index.html
“It’s a martyr’s death I am looking for,” Amrozi said during his trial in Denpasar, following the October Bali nightclub blasts.
Its a death cult with muslims, Gary!
Edward says
To prove this propensity, why do you think there’s so many suicide bombers? Some parents think its an honor to have bomber members in their family. They have great pride in their membership.Some families even get stipend for their patriotic offers!
Gary Devouges says
I guess it is deep-rooted in their culture.
Trico says
Update on Khizr Khan. Apparently the Freedom Fighter Group, Annonymous, has discovered a link between the slime ball Khizr Khan and the slime Clinton Foundation.
“Busted! KHAN Paid $375,000 From Clinton Foundation”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3-bliwlpjA
–
“The media spin always seems to be much different than reality when it comes to the Clintons. Once again we find that what looked like a Trump campaign derailment actually has a much darker corrupt component. The Clinton Foundation payed Khizr Khan more than $375,000. The money was sent from a Wells Fargo account to KM KHAN LAW OFFICE in NY CITY! Surprise Surprise!!! Trump much have eyes and ears everywhere. He always seems to know what’s going on behind the scenes. He is definitely being helped sources at very high levels.
Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.
Khan and his wife Ghazala Khan both appeared on stage at the Democratic National Convention to attack, on Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s behalf, Donald Trump—the Republican nominee for president. Their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, was killed in Iraq in 2004. Khizr Khan, in his speech to the DNC, lambasted Donald Trump for wanting to temporarily halt Islamic migration to America from countries with a proven history of exporting terrorists.
Since then, Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos—who served as a senior adviser to the president in Bill Clinton’s White House and is a Clinton Foundation donor as well as a host on the ABC network—pushed Trump on the matter in an interview. Trump’s comments in that interview have sparked the same mini-rebellion inside his party, in the media and across the aisle that has happened many times before. The usual suspects inside the GOP, from former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to House Speaker Paul Ryan to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to Ohio Gov. John Kasich, have condemned Trump in one way or another. The media condemnation has been swift and Democrats, as well their friends throughout media, are driving the train as fast as they can.”
–
Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together.
http://goo.gl/JwSGDh
–
Manuele says
JUST LOOKING AT FACE, NEVER TRUST A FUCKFACE LIKE THAT