In FrontPage today I show how Sadiq Khan’s new initiative against “hate speech” demonstrates how the Left serves the Islamic supremacist agenda:
London’s new Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, is allocating over two million dollars (£1,730,726) to an “online hate crime hub” enabling police to track and arrest “trolls” who “target…individuals and communities.” There can be no doubt, given the nature of the British political establishment today, which “trolls” these new Thought Police will be going after, and which “communities” will be protected from “hate speech.” “Islamophobia,” which David Horowitz and I termed “the thought crime of the totalitarian future,” is now going to bring down upon the hapless “trolls” the wrath of London’s Metropolitan police force — and this totalitarian new initiative shows yet again how easily the Leftist and Islamic supremacist agendas coincide and aid each other.
“The Metropolitan police service,” said a police spokesman, “is committed to working with our partners, including the mayor, to tackle all types of hate crime including offences committed online.” Given the fact that Khan, in a 2009 interview, dismissed moderate Muslims as “Uncle Toms” and has numerous questionable ties to Islamic supremacists, it is unlikely that he will be particularly concerned about “hate speech” by jihad preachers (several of whom were just recently welcomed into a Britain that has banned foes of jihad, including me).
And the “partners” of the London police are likely to include Tell Mama UK, which says on its website: “we work with Central Government to raise the issues of anti-Muslim hatred at a policy level and our work helps to shape and inform policy makers, whilst ensuring that an insight is brought into this area of work through the systematic recording and reporting of anti-Muslim hate incidents and crimes.” Tell Mama UK has previously been caught classifying as “anti-Muslim hate incidents and crimes” speech on Facebook and Twitter that it disliked. Now it will have the help of the London police to do that.
“The purpose of this programme,” we’re told, “is to strengthen the police and community response to this growing crime type.” This “crime type” is only “growing” because Britain has discarded the principle of the freedom of speech, and is committing itself increasingly to the idea that “hate speech” is objectively identifiable, and should be restricted by government and law enforcement action. Section 127 of the Communications Act of 2003 criminalizes “using [a] public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” and no groups are better at manifesting public annoyance than Islamic advocacy groups. A pastor in Northern Ireland, James McConnell, ran afoul of this law in 2014 when he dared to criticize Islam in a sermon; he was acquitted after an 18-month investigation and a trial, but the Metropolitan police will not want to be seen as wasting their new “hate speech” money; others will not be as fortunate as McConnell.
Behind the push for “hate speech” laws is, of course, the increasingly authoritarian Left. Increasingly unwilling (and doubtless unable) to engage its foes in rational discussion and debate, the Left is resorting more and more to the Alinskyite tactic of responding to conservatives only with ridicule and attempts to rule conservative views out of the realm of acceptable discourse. That coincides perfectly with the ongoing initiative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to intimidate the West into criminalizing criticism of Islam.
This is not the first time that a Sharia imperative and a Leftist one coincided during the relatively brief (so far) mayoral tenure of Sadiq Khan. The London Evening Standard reported on June 13 that “adverts which put Londoners under pressure over body image are to be banned from the Tube and bus network.” This was because “Sadiq Khan announced that Transport for London would no longer run ads which could cause body confidence issues, particularly among young people.”
Said Khan: “As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. Nobody should feel pressurised, while they travel on the Tube or bus, into unrealistic expectations surrounding their bodies and I want to send a clear message to the advertising industry about this.”
And so no more ads featuring women in bikinis on London buses. People often puzzle about how the hard Left and Islamic supremacists can make common cause, when they have such differing ideas of morality; Khan’s ad ban showed how. The Left’s concern with “body-shaming” and not putting people “under pressure over body image” meshed perfectly with the Sharia imperative to force women to cover themselves in order to remove occasions of temptation for men.
What next? Will London women be forced to cover everything except their face and hands (as per Muhammad’s command) so as not to put others “under pressure over body image”? And if they are, will anyone who dares to complain about what is happening to their green and pleasant land be locked up for “hate speech” by London’s new Thought Police?
Welcome to Sadiq Khan’s London. Shut up and put on your hijab.

Debi Brand says
Prime example of why, in our fight against those that have so awfully “twisted” a “noble and praiseworthy” peace ensuing “religion,” we must empower, and amplify the voices of, and thus press into leadership positions, the “Moderate Muslim.”
It is by them, and by our leaders and laymen who fall prey to the myth of two Islams in the “Book of Allah,” we will know safety and peace from the “radicals,” as we learn Allah’s limits and the Sunnah of the “beloved prophet” of Islam, and thus, learn, and adjust accordingly to our terms for peace.
As did proud strong nation after proud strong nation before us.
Jay Boo says
REMOVAL TIME
Bikinis — temp men to have sexual desires.
Clitorises — temp women to feel human and alive.
Steven says
You are a SICK and BRAINWASHED person if you truly believe those things.
gravenimage says
Steven, Jay Boo is a staunch Anti-Jihadist and a long time poster here. He was describing the barbaric Muslim point of view, *not* his own.
GroverMax says
How can you possibly think he was expressing his viewpoint or that he was condoning those abhorrent ideas? Have slipped past dissonance right into cognitive diffidence???
GroverMax says
That was “Have you slipped past”
Zero sleep in 48hrs and I’m dropping whole words… The cognitive diffidence must be contagious…
G. R. Gunning says
Irony does not do well on the internet. Without hearing the words spoken it frequently gets misinterpreted.
Marty says
I agree 100%.
I have found myself upvoting somethings that, on reflection, turn
out to have been pro islamic/Jew hating etc.
When great journalists, like the immensely brave & funny Rod Liddle, employ
irony we are all in on the joke.
But when posters like ourselves do it, we can easily be misunderstood.
The facts about the islamic colonisation & destruction of the West, aided &
abetted by naive, malignant leftists are so grotesquely serious that they don’t need
embellishing – Political satire is dead.
Keith Jordan says
When you say “temp”, do you mean tempt? Please write in English.
Nick and Nora says
WHAT DELUSIONAL BRAINWASHED CRAP ARE YOU TRYING TO SPEW??????
Nick and Nora says
MY COMMENT IS DIRECTED TO DEBI BRAND!!!!!!
worldcitizen1919 says
Just like the west wants the world to accept democracy and freedom so the Muslim world is working to build societies based on Islamic principles.
So we are faced with two main prospects, a western democratic world order or an Islamic Shariah Order or something in between.
But neither will accept the other completely as we have seen , so it will probably be a mix.
G. R. Gunning says
Like oil and water. Our governments are trying to effect the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan as we speak, yet no-one ever mentions it in the press or TV/radio. Even mentioning it in some newspaper comments gets it “moderated” – that is to say not accepted. It’s not going to work – oil & water do not mix – so we will land up with two parallel populations – one living in the 21st. Century and one in the 7th. Century. And it’s purpose is ……….. what exactly?.
CrossWare says
Well the Globalists wants to have worker/consumer class which is self policing. Suppressing army/police is expensive. Islam solves this problem for them.
linnte says
That’s my take on it too. Islam solve tons of problems. Including including exacerbating civil unrest to the point of civil war so the big kohunna can step in and save the world. Enter the Anti_Christ.
gravenimage says
Muslim apologist “worldcitizen1919” wrote:
Just like the west wants the world to accept democracy and freedom so the Muslim world is working to build societies based on Islamic principles.
So we are faced with two main prospects, a western democratic world order or an Islamic Shariah Order or something in between.
But neither will accept the other completely as we have seen , so it will probably be a mix.
…………………………….
There is *no* reason that we should have to accept the savagery of Shari’ah law in our own civilized nations.
And even though “worldcitizen1919’s” fellow Baha’i have had to flee oppression and violence in Dar-al-Islam, they still feel duty bound to whitewash the vile creed of Islam.
And who wants a “mix” of civilization and savagery? Shall we see rape victims stoned half to death here? sarc/
Marty says
If by “mix” you mean letting the muslim world carry on destroying all vestiges of
civilisation within its world. That’s fine by me. There’s little enough left.
Just as long as the West doesn’t let these savages get hold of our technology
or enter our parts of the world.
Churchill, like Gladstone, despised & hated islam, but they did not fear it,
because they knew muslims had no science.
Indeed, if they had not pillaged India, they’d have had no maths.
“Arabic” numerals being, in fact, Hindu numerals.
They did not imagine that greedy, evilly immoral, Westerners would sell
these savages our technology & weaponry
karl Anglin says
This new Lord Mayor of London may have gotten elected through voter fraud
DefenderofIslm says
I would be very careful about saying Islam being backward. In the 19th century that was true than European could defeat than mpslim army. In world war 1 it took 4 year to defeat the Ottoman Empire. churchhill though the Ottoman Empire in afew days.
DefenderofIslm says
Would fall. i than useing cell phone to sent this.
Gen Jones says
Drop that phone right now! Cell phone technology is a product of Zionist Motorola! Texting too. Use some Islamic technology, the uh um uh, you know tell it to some literate person and they’ll write it down.
linnte says
Islam is backward. Islam is backward. Islam is backward. Have you figured out yet that your threats don’t phase us here on Robert Spencer’s blog? If I was rich, I would hire a sign trailing airplane to fly above Islamic communities with truthful quotes from your own vile Qur’an about how much of a PERVERT Muhammad was. Thank the Lord he is dead and returned to the hell hole he rose from. Not only do we know the truth about your mentally ill little god Muhammad, we are ready to defend our country against Islamisation. My Glock and rifle are both locked and LOADED so BRING IT ON coward.
Angemon says
DefenderofIslm posted:
“I would be very careful about saying Islam being backward.”
You don’t know what “backward” means, do you?
“In the 19th century that was true than European could defeat than mpslim army. In world war 1 it took 4 year to defeat the Ottoman Empire.”
Only the Ottoman empire? Or it and all its *European* allies? Out of curiosity, how long did it took to defeat Saddam?
Mirren10 says
What’s ‘slm’, and why are you defending it ? 🙂
Georg says
When he’s not busy with the Muslim preoccupation of saving females from suggestive advertistising, he’s making sure nobodys critical of Islam on the internet. He’s exactly the Islamic entryist evolution would expect: He’s only as overt as he can be… no more and no less. Khan’s not held back by his intentions, but by Western concepts of general sensibility; as those erode, the Islamic will advances.
Freedom of speech, as many point out, is really about the freedom of unpopular speech; in effect, it’s about the ability to criticize and instigate. If we’re unable to forefully criticize something as outlandish as Islam, we’re in a lot of trouble and better go back to the fundamentals of the civics that made for Western civilization and its prosperity that is the envy and attraction of the world.
Here one can immediately see the sensibilities and aspirations of a Khan:
Yaffle says
I’m no fan of Khan. But I don’t really see what there is to object to here. If we must have Muslims, I’d rather they thought this way.
johnj says
You need a bit more experience with these guys. He is not on his own. Islam is a public religion. He will be under enormous pressure. this is step one. Next is food, alcohol and prayer rooms. The solution to each crisis and issue will fall slightly towards Islam. Just watch and learn.
Jay Boo says
The beginning few minutes of that speech sounds like an Islam Uber Alles call out to Muslims. After his list of foreign Muslim nations, I could stomach no more.
Georg says
@ Yaffle
If you look there are several shots of a kid waving around a jihadist flag, actually there are at least two people waving them. This is not objectionable? Especially when egged on by the mayor of a Western capital?
see 1:45 and 3:00
If we’re going to start Thought Policing, how about starting with the flags of maniacal sadists and not the people objecting to them?
Steven says
islamists do not know moderation. There is only the ultimate and that is RADICAL extermination of those that oppose them. They cook you like a frog in slowly warming water, slowly getting YOU to believe their veiled narrative.
gravenimage says
So, Yaffle–you prefer meretricious stealth Jihadists?
Lynette says
Don’t be fooled by double speech. islam teaches deceit, and lying is good and truth is evil. Please read the koran. islam says one thing in english and something else in arabic. It is called something which I have forgotten at the moment. Someone will post the correct name for this I am sure.
karl Anglin says
I call it double dealing
Westman says
Sadly, the “riverbed” of Islam, of which Khan speaks, is violence toward and subjugation of the unbeliever.
Unlike Christianity, Islam has no reformer, leaving the modern peaceful attitude, that Khan projects as the face of Islam, to be an assumed mirage that dissappears on inspection of the “riverbed”. With such a sandy bottom, peaceful Muslims have no authoritive Muhammadan or Quranic source on which to hang the mantle of peacefulness.
“Peaceful” Muslims may claim that violent devout Muslims are charlatans, yet it is the charlatans who can quote Islamic doctrine to support their actions while the “peaceful” fulminate and decry the violent Muslims with only insults and rejection. Many Muslims may be peaceful yet there is no peaceful, inclusive doctrine toward the unbelievers to be found in Islam’s foundation.
Even, as an agnostic, I find it amusing that Islam claims to recognize Jesus as a prophet while ignoring his teachings. Can anyone find an Imam, in a Friday sermon, quoting Jesus on the beatitudes?
karl Anglin says
Any one who thinks Islam will be reformed is high on drugs
DefenderofIslm says
Yes our Iman in many firday prayer talk to us about Jesus
Gen Jones says
No he talks to you about Isa. Trust me, you don’t know Jesus.
linnte says
YHWH protects his Word, Jesus is Gods mouthpiece. I know your Imam perverts his words about Jesus. That is so sad.
gravenimage says
I can’t believe this thug is mayor of London. What a lying scum. His citing Medina as a “multicultural society” could not be more perverse–it *was*, before the “Prophet” and his thug companions showed up. After that, he drove out, enslaved, or slaughtered the entire non-Muslim population there.
That is *exactly* what Khan and his fellow Muslims want to do to us.
Debi Brand says
Indeed. Well said, g-i.
linnte says
The internet is called the World Wide Web for a reason. If someone begins to work at monitoring communications on the Net in a certain area, in this case London, that will actually cause monitoring to happen in all of Britain and any place the British people communicate TO. Because it is all traceable. Everywhere. Even a good hacker can get our email addresses from here. Wiki leaks has proved that time and time again.
So Khan already has his information on people. What he will do is slowly stamp out people who are speaking out about Islam in his area by threatening them with prison time, like Tommy Robinson, and trust me, they will acquiesce! He has already gift wrapped Britain and given it to Islam.
common sense says
Yup, it is definitely our ability call something or someone out as wrong and potentially disas,orous that is the crux of free speech.
I do not like Khan’s tone at all and I can see through a well veiled slowly advancing assault of ideas. Its ok for Muslims to fundamentally change a nation from its origins bug how dare that nation fight back. That is the Muslim view, are we even speaking in terms of Jihad yet? Nope not to me. Just plain ole Islam.
Debi Brand says
Khan banks on ignorance of Islam being both rampant and stalwart in non-Muslims in his audience.
Georg says
Here is Khan’s brother-in-law of 20+ years. His sister recently divorced, perhaps it had to do witih politics. What kind of a household did he and his sister grow up in where she found this jihadist to be a desirable suitor?
Debi Brand says
“What kind of a household did he and his sister grow up in where she found this jihadist to be a desirable suitor?”
Answer: clearly, by his preaching, he was raised in a “good” Muslim home, which is a home with adults and thus children guided only by the Qur’an and the Sunnah.
Jay Boo says
He is declaring SHARIA war.
When this literally all blows up in their faces they will whine how the backlash they instigated is not FAIR.
Aron says
https://youtu.be/wLB7tMZpVzQ
gravenimage says
According to this account, prison terms of up to two years accompany this sick law.
I would ask *how can this be legal in England?*–but then, I never would have believe that Britain could ban peaceful Anti-Jihadists from entering the country, either.
Charli Main says
Coming soon. London’s Muslim mayor orders all Metropolitan women police offices to wear burkas. while conducting their duties on the streets of London.
gravenimage says
It’s getting harder to parody things, Charli:
“British Police Introduce Official Hijab, Will Do ‘Anything’ For ‘Diversity’”
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/08/british-police-introduce-official-hijab-will-anything-diversity/
Imagine calling the police and having one of these things show up?
Mirren10 says
A disgusting and nauseating picture, but also hilarious.
I can just see one of these stupid bints, trying to arrest a suspect, when he/she grabs their stupid slave rag and chokes them with it. 🙂
Gen Jones says
How would they be able to arrest a Muslim male? Women should not be in authority over men as per the Koran.
Mirren10 says
You’re probably right.
If it ever comes to pass, these repulsive bints will most likely be in the office, hunched over a computer modem.
islam the religion of killers says
And how long has this muslim been in charge, I thought it would have been a woman’s right to be in advertising, an advertisers right to advertise wherever it can and a viewers right to not look at public displayed imagery …
Next thing we’ll me like all muslims with Mohamid telling us how to wipe our ass….
Kumi Ho says
I spoke with my cousin living in London. She thinks this is a common sense decision because ‘children have suicided because of online bullying’. She doesn’t see it, this creeping, cultural Sharia.
gravenimage says
Of course, this will not stop *actual* hate speech–Allahu Akbaring Muslims calling for beheadings in the street.
Son of the West says
This is where poor education and intellectual laziness have created such fertile soil for civilizational disaster. There is a gulf between bigotry on one hand, and genuine criticism of policy and practices of a group of people on the other. No one had a problem understanding that opposing communism was not the same as being bigoted against Russians. Likewise, people should be able to understand that opposing Islam is not the same as anti-Arab bigotry, especially since anyone can be a Muslim. (Either way, bigotry should not be a criminal offense, just poor manners)
However, when the intellectually stunted mind of the average Western citizen is confronted with the truth about Islam, they experience cognitive dissonance, and react with scorn or anger to the person who makes the comment that has caused this condition in their minds. It doesn’t matter how nicely you present the truth, how well reasoned your points are, they have been told over and over by the media and elites that Islam is a peaceful religion, etc, and hold on to this idea as a gospel truth. You will especially notice the irrational nature of their reaction, as you will never get a coherent counter argument out of them. At best, it will be some incoherent bromides about the crusades or how all religions are violent or something.
I point this out to bring some hope. As much as the scale is tilted toward the Religion of Hate in the media, it means there is little substance in the minds of most why they should favor Islam, as there is no good truth to back of the propaganda coming from Muslims and their fellow travelers and useful idiots. Even if the discussion is forced offline, there is still ample opportunity to communicate the truth in person, by physical media such as posters and print, and so on.
Lesley says
@Son of the West:
Hear, hear!
I lost a budding friendship with a neighbor who in the scenario you described about Leftist emotional over reaction to logic could only talk about how she had Muslim neighbors 20 years ago when she lived in another state, and they were so nice.
Never mind that there were Islamists a few years ago weapons training in our rural area and arrested for a Muhammad- approved evil plot.
No matter how I agreed with her that I’m sure her neighbors had been nice, and reiterated over and over that I was talking about the ideology and not her old neighbors, she couldn’t hear me.
I offered her a link to read the Koran and Hadith online for herself, and suggested that as a better idea rather than swallowing the narrative the mainstream media is feeding us; read their texts and make up your own mind.
She was suddenly very offended and upset, and I was not upset and kept trying to redirect the conversation back to facts and ideas.
It all started with me expressing concern about safety in our area, and the news I had found about the Islamists a few years back; very strange :-/
CrossWare says
I had the same experience, people just too dumb. They think in Hollywood terms so if the person is not looking like a mustache twirling typical villain, then simply can’t imagine it could be up to no good, or subscribed into an ideology which could harm them. They too stupid to realize they being subjected to taqiyya or simply just met an “apostate”.
Kay says
This is true. I see it all the time. People don’t want to hear. To be fair Mohammedism is so strange that it sounds like you’re talking about ufos or giant green lizards. People (no one we’ve ever known) acts like the M system advocates.
The Pope and other Catholics are making it worse by advocating “dialogue” in which we focus on our agreements.
But we can’t really fathom how Muhammedism plays its tricks, riding a horse until it no longer suits.
Maybe the comeback I need is “Have you read the Koran etc.?”
gravenimage says
Lesley, CrossWare, and Kay, this is all depressingly familiar.
And Kay, it is not just Catholics who are in deep denial, but many other Christians, Jews, and secularists, as well.
mortimer says
The Islamic war against freedom of expression is now out in the open. What will the British people do now? The barbarians are taken the capital city of the UK will the help of British insiders who have no idea they will be the next victims of the totalitarians they aid and abet.
mortimer says
Sadiq Khan has revealed to anyone with the power of thought that Islam is incompatible with freedom of expression and incapable of reasoned debate. He is imposing totalitarianism with the help of Leftist useful idiots.
Georg says
Islam cannot survive on the field of open ideas. Yet it has been around for 1400 years. Therefore we know it is extremely adept at shutting down reflexive criticism and criticism from without. That Khan is worried about “hate speech” when the Koran is overflowing with it points very clearly to his lack of principle and mission of agenda.
One cannot be against hate speech and for the Koran.
Alex says
Well … Citizens of London do deserve it … They brought him into control … So suck it
Lesley says
@Alex:
Yes, they voted Khan in, but the problem with the “suck it” attitude is that the less we care about the free world shrinking in another place, the less vigilant we may be about our freedoms shrinking in our own countries.
I really hope I’m wrong, but I think this time is a lead-in to another world war to save the civilized world. Every war requires allies to help each other, and the UK is starting to look crippled…
mortimer says
The business community of London will not like having its freedom of expression abused by this totalitarian. They will find a way to defeat him.
gravenimage says
I’m not ceding *any* part of the civilized world to the Muslim barbarians if I can help it.
Mirren10 says
Hear, hear, graven !
linnte says
Me either!!!!! Give me Liberty or give me death!
Alex says
I agree , the war is already on but our leader are too coward to admit it , we cant help someone who don’t wanna help himslef ! During WW2 the British were all in against the nazis , when we got involved we were helping a strong , consistent and truthful ally !
Angemon says
I suspect it was no accident that the left pushed for removing pics of attractive women in bathing suits rather than forcing companies to make ads with “size plus” models in bathing suits. You know, to make chubbier women feel good about their bodies and stuff.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Angemon. Khan’s support for banning images of women in swimsuits had *nothing* to do with the issue of ‘body shaming’–but he is willing to use anything to impose Shari’ah bit by bit. Typical stealth Jihad.
Infidel from Down Under says
And if London thought the blitz was bad!
gravenimage says
My mother went through the London Blitz. At least then Londoners were *fighting back*.
StuartG says
Incredible, but unsurprising. His first action as Mayor is to use public money to stop people being critical of Muslims.
WorkingClassPost says
So now we know what he’s spending our taxes on, that he saved from catching criminals:-http://primaryaccount.blogspot.pt/2016/06/uk-if-one-picture-says-thousand-words.html?m=1
WorkingClassPost says
Not sure if that link works, on a phone so hard to check it, last try:-
http://primaryaccount.blogspot.pt/2016/06/uk-if-one-picture-says-thousand-words.html?m=1
gravenimage says
Very disturbing. Seems to be plenty of money *for this*, though.
WorkingClassPost says
BTW. On sharia-free vacation, and the good news is that the islamistan of Europe is far from complete.
In several days I’ve seen only one headscarf and no burkas or whatever those bin bags are called.
But it’s a reminder of just how compromised London has become, when that’s one of the first things to notice.
Strange how we welcomed Kahn and his cohorts, but I doubt they’ll be ready to welcome me back with anything like the same generosity or tolerance.
Never mind, the pool’s waiting for me to make a splash…
johnj says
He is starting a gradual process. He would be advised by his friends., relations and his Imam.
First take moral a stance. Nothing outrageous. The Left and the caring will follow you. Once they trust you, next introduce Sharia very very gradually. The best time is when there is a problem. Do it as a equity issue. Food, drop the alcohol and then the prayer rooms. Get public used to the Imams as nice people who solve problems —– little by little… A few fellow Muslims in positions of power – but nothing sudden. Keep the Christian clergy happy and smiling. Comment on their tolerance…. they love that..
CrossWare says
You are unfortunately very right… I think UK is lost. Just by the demographics they will be a Muslim majority by the second part of the century.
gravenimage says
Stealth Jihad…
VampireJack says
I wonder how long it will be before Kahn decides, for public safety of course, that alcohol is to be banned in the streets of London. Not in pubs mind, not yet….
gravenimage says
Already happening, Jack:
“This map shows all the places where drinking in public is banned in London”
http://www.timeout.com/london/blog/this-map-shows-all-the-places-where-drinking-in-public-is-banned-in-london-112715
John A. Marre says
Did he devote as much money to stopping Muslims who rape and behead Brits? obviously not, since his goal is the establishment of sharia in Britain.
Don McKellar says
Wow, the people of London are so completely clueless about what is happening to them. Astonishing. Isn’t it the only area in England that didn’t go Brexit? It’s as if they want an outside force to control them and tell them what they can and can’t do. Like zombies, they are fodder for Sharia takeover. A city of dhimmis.
WorkingClassPost says
Yes, London may be the testing grounds for the survival of our species.
Some already call it londonistan, but the real threat is that it becomes Lonstantinople.
Jay Boo says
“no more ads featuring women in bikinis on London buses.”
That is a good thing.
Isn’t Khan is doing this to stop Muslim men from raping and forming rape gangs against British children in spite of the clear teaching of his religion of Islam that Muslim men are expected to rape infidels?.
Jay Boo says
No bikinis — to make tent wearing women feel like out-of-place alien freaks.
No bikinis — to remind Muslim women that they have no clitoris.
Jay Boo says
I would like to buy London billboard space.
One photo of three burka ladies walking on a steaming hot beach.
Caption: — WTF
Charli Main says
” Mayor” Khan’s wife and two daughters could be used as the beach models.
JSteering says
Britain’s biggest problem is this: it is the most politically correct country in Europe, obsessed with diversity and crippled by fantasies of multiculturalism. It has put black Africans and Muslims above criticism, no one dare criticise them. The rest of Europe is becoming increasingly hostile, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam. But not Britain.
Its future as a civilised, cultured country depends on if and when it fights back against the evils of multiculturalism.
vcragain says
It’s NOT the concept of multiculturalism itself that is the problem, unless of course you are a blatant racist who can’t stand to look at a non-white face ? The problem is really only Islam, it’s peculiar ambitions, unlike any other belief system, wanting to take control of the world and threatening all others. Because multiculturalism is an ideology of acceptance of all, it is a direct threat to Islam and Islam is a direct threat to it. We are in a perilous position in the West, because now we are forced to reconsider our own ideals and try to decide what to do to prevent Islam’s ongoing gradual control & takeover of our precious civilization. We need high-level acceptance of the problem and a determination to change our rules & behaviors to prevent this happening. We are at a crossroads. If you can’t see what the ambition of Islam actually IS, then you cannot solve the problem, that is where we are. I keep writing to tv presenters etc to try & get a discussion going, but of course no-one wants to talk about it, except as a ‘crazy person thinks Muslims are a threat’ scenario ! NO – not Muslims – there are more than billion of them, mostly just quiet peaceful people with no hatred in their souls – not THEM, their political-religious organization of ISLAM (the religion NOT of peace but of SUBMISSION !!!!). That book full of hatred & violence, that lying system of taqqiya, the hateful male-dominance female-suppression system – that is what I hate, and no-one can make me feel otherwise.
Without a discussion we are sitting ducks. Even my own daughter-in-law is freezing me out because of my fairly recent conversion to this view of the subject ! I will be off the planet very likely before they get control of the US but my grandchildren deserve to inherit Western Civilization NOT an Islamic State. We need our leaders to decree & make VERY clear that while we do not have a problem with little people praying to their God of choice – we DO have a problem with any expected substitution of their values over ours. We will NOT change ourselves to fit their requirements !
Lesley says
@vcragain:
The problem with multiculturalism is that it is based on political correctness and cultural relativism. In other words, we mustn’t say anything to criticize another culture’s backwardness or “ways” because to do so would automatically be intolerant, and we are to consider their culture as separate but equal at all costs.
What is better than multiculturalism is to embrace people of all colors and backgrounds if they have the same values as we do; to stand with us in the free world. If people stand for freedoms for women, and protections for homosexuals and children, and free speech, etc. then we can continue to progress as free societies. This will be impossible if we give concessions to people of other backgrounds because it’s just their custom and we don’t demand that immigrants adopt western values.
Being against multiculturalism has nothing to do with racism; it is about holding newcomers to western moral standards for the greater (and their own) good, and the continued success of our civilization. If we don’t have standards, we will lose what we have built. I am in favor of immigrants from the third world contributing good cuisine, and other good things from their background as long as they adopt our values (and sanitary practices).
Otherwise, I completely agree with you about Islam 🙂
davej says
Step one: Create problem by allowing Muslim immigration, Mosque building and no-go areas, with consequent attacks on “infidels”.
Step two: Clamp down on resulting criticism of Muslims, Sharia and the Quran by criminalizing free speech.
Presto, instant Totalitarian State.
marina says
This is the beginning of the end of the beautiful english culture.
ConnectingDots says
I was in London in July and August. In my opinion, Londoners have become NUMB to seeing women in full burkas sharing their city with them. For example, while dining at an upscale hotel there, I saw a small woman carefully raising her head-covering ever so slightly — and not so that we could see even her neck — to eat breakfast. Nobody in the hotel restaurant seemed to raise an eyebrow.
Would the hotel where I stayed and ate have been concerned about its guests’ and staff members’ safety, if a 300-lb. man had worn a KKK hood to breakfast? I would hope so, but why is there a double-standard? Sharia-compliant woman okay but KKK-member man NOT okay?
Take ideology out of the hypothetical scenario. Suppose the 300-lb. man were wearing a full-head-covering pig mask. Would the hotel have been concerned about HIM?
Yet, the UK blocks people such as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from entry.
mortimer says
The Islamic veil is the symbol of female servitude and serfdom. Rather than a religious symbol, it is a symbol of ownership.
The Muslim women who wear the veil are declaring that they enjoy being a slave … the absolute property for eternity of a man.
JSteering says
You are so right. This is a typical male viewpoint which throws doubt on the “religious” aspect:-
A shocking documentary on Britain’s Channel 4, “The Men With Many Wives” – polygamous marriage in Britain – had this quote from one of the men it followed who insists on his wives covering their faces with the traditional veil: ‘My wives are something to be covered and protected for me,’ he says. ‘Some people put sheets over their cars, they cover their valuables and keep them away from people seeing and desiring the things that they have.’
Women are no more than possessions in Islam. Pure and simple.
gravenimage says
Very true.
linnte says
And after the Muslim women die and go to Paradise? No perks for them, and even their husbands will be too busy with their virgins to even have a conversation with them! Good grief these MUSLIMAS are stooooopid!
Gen Jones says
True! Of all the ugly and stupid aspects of Islam, the idea of heaven being a brothel rather than a sacred place is the most offensive to women. But then the literal translation of Islamic marriage – nikah – is basically ‘fuck contract’. Contrast to, say, Christianity where marriage is a sacrament.
Richard Paulsen says
Quick change initiating Article 58, the penalcode of the RSFSR. Enemies to the peasants councils and the workers government of the USSR, counter revolutionaries, traitors, spies, bourgeois nationalists and separatists, agents of the international bourgeoisie, anti-soviet propaganda.
From development to decline. From the agrarian society to industrialization to urbanization to postindustrial society to islamization and the islamized society.
Jim says
Londoners bought this upon themselves by voting in a Muslim terrorist sympathizer. How can a once great country so strong with a ruck culture and history allow it self to be taken over by Muslims. This is just the beginning, just watch with this radical mayor will do to change the face of the country. People need to rise up. If people can prove he’s a terrorist sympathizer then prove it and have him thrown out of office.
Troybeam says
The last stages of complete Islamic takeover is underway in London, this is a prime example of why any and all Muslims should not be elected to any government office that is not Islamic.
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: London’s Muslim Mayor Introduces the Thought Police
……………………..
Under Shari’ah law no one is allowed to criticize Islam. That is where London is heading.
linnte says
Paris is suffering financially because tourism is down 50%. Londonistan will experience the same thing and this in essence will further isolate London to become more Islamic. Britain is so screwed. I think about people like Toni Bugle and Tommy Robinson; they will be silenced! How can we help them? I have no clue!
gravenimage says
Terrible–but no surprise. Now, more than ever, this is the time for all patriotic Britons to *stand up*!
common sense says
Khan probably inserted some mind controlling parasitic bugs from Seti Alpha 6 into key members of parliment to get this one through.
My best guess is there is a lot of resistance to shariah and Muslims on the British internet and the Muslims got their feelings hurt.
2 mil in tax money paid by Brits to shut themselves up about it. Weird man just weird.
Maybe Khan is also butt hurt over his favorite Imam Choudary going to prison.
Brits please just make a T shirt that says “ban shiriah” and “No more FGM”. That would be worthy of a try.
cliffface says
Perhaps in kahns perfect sharieye attractive people can cover their face so as not to upset unattractive people.
Maybe tall people can crawl on their knees so short people are not offended at not being tall.
Maybe young people can stay indoors so that old people are not upset by looking older.
PM May has a job on her hands as the natives are becoming restless and moscum like kahn are the ones lighting fires.
Ciudadano says
For centuries Christianity and Christians have undergone a big deal of scrutiny and criticism. The freedom of conscience and speech were created in part in opposition to religious obscurantism and totalitarianism. There is no reason why Islam and Muslims should not be subject to the same scrutiny and criticism. It is necessary and they need it even more. Criticism of Islam should be encouraged and promoted in Islamic countries by any supporter of free thinking. A guy like Voltaire wouldn’t last a day in a country like Saudi Arabia.
The Catholic church has been criticized ad nauseum for trying to silence dissident voices. Well, in Islamic countries critics of Islam are generally killed, that’s why there are no many.
Muslims in Islamic countries are still living under religious obscurantism and that obscurantism is quickly being imported into the west. Islamic countries desperately need their own version of western illustration to get rid of Islamic obscurantism.
James says
Criminalizing Anti-Islamic speech and only anti Islamic speech shows you how unbalanced, unjust, unequal their values be. It is not out of concern or fear but it is meticulously invented to be used for offensive purposes and yet disguised to look like defensive purposes. When was the last time anyone saw a pastor preaching to the church to kill every last Moslem? Or tell the congregation that Moslims are lower than apes and pigs and therefore have no rights? They are the hypocrites who have been committing these crimes now they will have a unique law to protect them? This is straight from the inventors of islamaphobia which is proven as fake. Terrorists attack, imams preaching violence, rapes, increasingly to a daily level but if you’re concerned … It’s a phobia?
The purpose of such a law would be to protect their hate culture and people like choudary.
That’s like someone punching a stranger in the mouth then run off to the police asking for protection because he knows his action draws a reaction. And that is one of their characteristics BTW
Geppetto says
In London, as in America, all of their citizenry are dealing with the consequences of a corrupt electoral process. This London mayor and Barack Hussein Obama were elected by a majority of the voters and ALL Londoners and Americans, and every other “infidel” democracy on the planet, are dealing with the consequences of the contamination of that process. Leftist progressives have taken control of the narrative, that which was once dedicated to inform, and have achieved their long sought metamorphosis into institutions of indoctrination. How else to explain this Mayor, Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton’s lopsided popularity, assuming the recent poll results are accurate; the power of propaganda and the nemesis of democracy, ignorance. Given the increasing calumny directed against the voices of objective and rational dissent, this drift towards ever more idealistic political correctness and the lopsided, overly sensitive and disturbingly obsequious reactions to the alleged violence, persecution and prejudice directed against Muslims only, based on little and sometimes fabricated evidence, is making a mockery of one of the most revered freedoms the west has fought and died to protect, the freedom of speech.
More Ham Ed says
If you disagree you have a “phobia” of some kind. A pretty slick taqiyya implementation by both leftists and jihadi front groups.
epistemology says
History repeating, in Nazi Germany nobody was allowed to criticize the Hitler and his Nazi policy. Islam and Nazism have the same ideology and supremacy, welcome to the new world in Europe.