Common sense. And long overdue. It would be difficult to devise a test that could not withstand a practiced and skillful taqiyya artist, but why should the attempt not be made? Unsurprisingly, the Washington Post is enraged, along with the rest of the mainstream media, and is doing all it can to discredit and defeat Trump.
The obvious fact that they are so deeply threatened by him is the best testimony to his viability as a candidate — better even than his own statements. The political and media elites are frightened to the core, and their globalist and pro-jihad policies are threatened, and that is a very good thing.
“Trump proposes ideological test for Muslim immigrants and visitors to the U.S.,” by Karen DeYoung, Washington Post, August 15, 2016:
Donald Trump called Monday for a Cold War-style mobilization against “radical Islamic terror,” repeating and repackaging calls for strict immigration controls — including a new ideological litmus test for Muslim visitors and migrants — and blaming the current level of worldwide terrorist attacks on President Obama and Hillary Clinton.
In a grab bag of promises to battle the Islamic State organization together with Russia and anyone else who wants to join the fight, the Republican nominee underlined the need to improve intelligence and shut down militant propaganda, recruiting and financing.
But he provided few specifics on how he would expand such efforts beyond those already underway.
“My administration will aggressively pursue joint and coalition military operations to crush and destroy ISIS,” Trump said in a speech in Youngstown, Ohio, using an acronym for the Islamic State. “International cooperation to cut off their funding, expanded intelligence sharing and cyberwarfare to disrupt and disable their propaganda and recruiting . . . It’s got to be stopped.”
The speech was one in a series of prepared remarks the Republican presidential nominee has scheduled, amid criticism of controversial off-the-cuff policy pronouncements that he has later dismissed as jokes or sarcasm. Reading directly from a TelePrompter, a subdued Trump rarely departed from his script.
The principal new initiative was what Trump called “extreme vetting” for “any hostile attitude towards our country or its principles, or who believed sharia law should supplant American law. . . . Those who did not believe in our Constitution or who support bigotry and hatred will not be admitted for immigration into our country.”
“In the Cold War,” he said, “we had an ideological screening test. The time is overdue to develop a new screening test for the threats we face today. . . . I call it extreme, extreme vetting.”…

Keys says
Let’s vet the hell out of ’em !
Jay Boo says
” “extreme vetting” for “any hostile attitude towards our country or its principles, or who believed sharia law should supplant American law.”
Obviously we must therefore begin with:
(HILLARY CLINTON)
Raja says
Jay ,
I like your sense of humor.
Tragically, she would pass through even “the most extreme vetting” thanks to her taqiyya prowess called in the West as pathological lying/ con artistry !!!
Lion of Judah's Cub says
Hillary = Jezebel; Bill = King Ahab
Lion of Judah's Cub says
It is regrettable that Hillary’s gifts – intelligence, education, privilege, access to power, position as Secretary of State – were used for evil rather than good.
William says
I never in my wildest dreams imagined I would live to see the day when we would have a candidate for the presidency speak so plainly and so forthrightly. Trump’s speech today was a god send for this nation and possibly others. The man has grown in knowledge and conviction, unlike all the rest.
Rufolino says
Unfortunately, most of the mainstream media influencing opinion don’t agree with you ! As an observer in Europe who is fairly dispassionate about American politics, I find the possibility of Mrs.Clinton as President alarming and despair-inducing.
Afrostreewise says
I find that to be true about the media trying to influence everyone. Even we in the land of Obama’s father are daily inundated with negative coverage of Trump via CNN and ALjazeera. But I believe Tramp is not fairing as bad as they portray him in the polls.
overman says
BBC, SKY NEWS UK, FRANCE 24 [very muslim-biased], and also RT.
Just about every News rag worldwide. Some journalists are speaking out – in particular Katie Hopkins of DMail.
Here she is supporting Trump when 500,000 signed a petition to ban him from the UK [probably 500,000 muslims].
linnte says
If you look at the difference between a Trump rally, and a Clinton rally, you will wonder just WHO is voting for Clinton. Trump’s audience is very interactive with him. Trump is saying ALL the right things, and I would assume Clinton is too, attempting to say what she thinks her followers want to hear. But recently Trump has made concrete ideas and tactics.
N Mekota says
Whoever wrote the speech for Trump to read is more aware of the problem.
Shane says
It is so sad that any American with an intelligence over that of a moron would find anything objectionable in Trump’s comments about vetting immigrants. No immigrant has a right to come to America, and it makes sense to not take immigrants who believe in Jihad, and in misogynistic and barbaric Sharia.
Berengaria says
Cheers for Extreme Vetting,Extreme Vetting! Why did not the nimcompoops of GOV, try this test in 2001, after 9/11? Without Donald, we would continue the failed policy of all the previous regimes. Buying the Hearts & Minds of the Enemy, Islam!
Peter the Hermit says
Bravo, Donald. You said what needed to be said. Two important additions to the political discourse: Plans to go after organizations in America that support Radical Islam: How about CAIR, the Muslim Students Association, ISNA, ICNA, to name but a few of the unindicted co-conspirators at the HolyLand Foundation terror-funding trial? Long overdue! Also, intentions to educate Americans about the Radical Islam ideology. Yes! Time to put all that “hate speech” back into law enforcement training manuals so that America is no longer, as Stephen Coughlin puts it, blindfolded in the face of Jihad.
West says
If you make it a bunch of questions then they will lie, but its better than nothing, and it should absolutely be done.
Guest says
And this ladies and gentlemen is why I’m voting for Trump this November. Hillary may finally be falling to illness, and not a moment to soon.
linnte says
I listened to his Foreign policy speech and it was excellent! He surprises me so much. I never once saw him use a piece of paper for notes. He rattled off the numbers and names of Jihad attacks all over the world. His voice was quiet and calm.
For extreme vetting, I suggest the lie detector test. And videoing their facial responses to questions looking for clues of lying. But the best part is, Trump said absolutely no refugees from war torn Muslim countries.
GO TRUMP!
kessler says
I agree – his foreign policy speech is his best yet. I’m pleasantly surprised, as this is what I was hoping for; a Trump which is less confrontational in his terminology, and more focused on facts in a clear, concise manner. Bravo!
For anyone who haven’t watched it, please…
overman says
Thing is very few are coming from war-torn country’s like Syria. Most refugees appear to be ‘Economic refugees’ who are NOT Syian.
Personally, l think muslims should be kept in muslim countries, unless absolutely proven they want to leave lslam. lt’s a pity about the children because they’re using them as a sympathy-tool to get in. And, unfortunately, the kids are brainwashed from an early age.
Lie-Tests are probably useless against trained Jihadi’s. Perhaps the Brain Scan they use for Psychopaths would work – because most muslims seem to fall into this category.
Mirren10 says
”For extreme vetting, I suggest the lie detector test. And videoing their facial responses to questions looking for clues of lying.”
Mr. Trump needs to ask the Israelis. They know how to do it.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes. They’re probably better at it than anyone else; because for sixty plus years their lives have depended on it, and they’ve survived so far.
Mirren10 says
Indeed. Let’s hope Mr. Trump has the nous to ask those who are **on the front line of the jihad**, and take their advice.
Who knows ? If Mr. Trump becomes the President ( I devoutly hope), and he closely liaises with the Israelis, we may see a really serious and sensible response to the jihad threat.
And *that* may inspire the rest of the pusillanimous countries of Western Europe.
John Stefan says
And the videos of every person ought to be stored who is trying to enter our country and, if and when it will be shown in the future that they have lied, out they go. It ought to be told them that we are wise to the fact that their allah encourages them to lie and to deceive the infidels and also told them that these proceedings are recorded and in the future, if we find out that they have lied, out they go. Tell them that we in the U.S. would rather not have any Islamists, Muslims, in our country because the teachings of the Qur’an and the Hadiths and the Sira are totally against the truth and our way of life in this country. “It would be best for you Muslims were you to simply give up on your Qur’an. You would get along much better in the U.S. were you to do so. Become an atheist, agnostic, Zoroastrian, a follower of Baal of the Old Testament or best of all read the Bible and become a Christian, anything, but get out of Islam. It is a great evil.”
Eur says
That can not be done , it is Islamophobic . Every Muslim have the Koran as supreme law , grey must follow the sharia and try to implement it. Stop it is Islamophobic , we must agree that Muslims destroy our societies , otherwise they could call us racists.we have to thank to come to bring the law of Allah and treat us as inferior.
KnowThyEnemy says
“It would be difficult to devise a test that could not withstand a practiced and skillful taqiyya artist,….”
I propose that we need a multipronged approach to keep America safe from the enemy’s designs. It is a good thing that Washington Post calls it an “ideological test” because at the root this enemy is an ideology.
First of all we need to name the ideology correctly or else we will never be able to defeat it! During WW2 the ideology was Nazism and during the cold war it was Communism. In the current case this ideology is Islam. Not “jihadism”, not “radical Islam”, not “radical Islamic terrorism”, but Islam! We also need to recognize that Islam and Sharia are one and the same things. Sharia simply means “how to practice the religion of Islam”.
Once we have identified the enemy correctly then we follow the next four-pronged procedure-
1) Blacklisting: If Islam is an enemy, and it is, then its followers must be kept from acquiring any positions of power or influence. This should be done irrelevant of whether they are aliens or US citizens. This was done with Nazis and Communists, so there is no reason why this cannot be done with Islam-followers!
2) Testing of aliens wanting to enter US: This testing does not have to be complicated at all. All that needs to be done is the usual vetting that is done with everyone else plus the following three questions should be asked- a. Do you believe Quran is actually from God (Allah)? b. Do you believe Muhammad is messenger of Allah? c. Are you a Muslim? If the person answers yes to any of them, they don’t get to enter US, period! If the person answers no and gives satisfactory explanations regarding anything odd, let him/her in! Do not worry if s/he employed taqiyya because the other three prongs will take care of that.
3) Public awareness: Just as in the past the American public was educated (in schools, colleges, TV, radio, etc) that Nazism and Communism were bad, and was told why those ideologies were bad, the same needs to be done regarding Islam. People should know what makes Islam poisonous and subversive and what makes its followers dangerous. They should know why Muslims are being treated as the fifth column. In addition, Hillary Clinton’s “old fashioned techniques of shaming and peer-pressure” should be employed on Islam followers and their leftist friends. This way, Muslims would be unable to advance Islam even if they got in through employing taqiyya.
4) Surveillance: The Islamo-aware citizens need to keep an eye out to see which Muslims go to mosques, say things to make Islam look good, or otherwise indulge in suspicious activity. If you know about a person who entered the US after the Muslim ban was enacted and you see him going to mosque, following Islam, or participating in pro-Islam activities, report the bastard to Trump’s deportation squad. (He would be deported for deception.) There should be a reward for positive cases.
Do these four things together and there is no chance Islam will thrive or flourish in the US. Instead it would fail and fizzle out in a decade or two. The same will then happen in other countries. Guaranteed.
Sorry if all this sounds mean but a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do to keep his country safe!
Infidel from Down Under says
Trump is only saying what most countries wish they had actually done 30 or more years go .
But still incredibly after all that has happened,and still yet remains to happen, Trump is still one of the few who has the guts to get up and say it
Donald J Trump is welcome in Australia anytime
Kessler says
A common sense proposal which is way overdue. And too late in Europe where a million unvetted muslims entered Germany already.
However, as some pointed out lying is easy. So what can be done to bring out some real emotions?
I would suggest starting off by explaining them the basic principles and importance of free speech. That in this country, no religion or religious figure is immune to satire and critique. I would then show them depictions of Muhammed and ask if them what they think. Of course, they have the right to be offended, but suggesting punishments for these depictions means they favour Sharia over Western democracy. Simply asking them yes or no questions is not going to work.
David M says
German officials are outright lying about, claiming crime has not risen due to the refugees. The truth will come out.
In an unusual move, Germany’s Interior Ministry and the Federal Criminal Police Office released crime data for 2015 and the first quarter of 2016 in June. “Immigrants are not more criminal than Germans,” a ministry spokesman was quoted as saying. Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans committed fewer crimes than refugees from other countries. Overall, crime levels have declined over the first quarter of the year, officials said.
kessler says
Not sure how that statement fits in with this:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-crime-idUSKCN0YT28V
steve says
President Trump`s new Commission on Radical Islam:
“That is why one of my first acts as President will be to establish a Commission on Radical Islam – which will include reformist voices in the Muslim community who will hopefully work with us. We want to build bridges and erase divisions.
The goal of the commission will be to identify and explain to the American public the core convictions and beliefs of Radical Islam, to identify the warning signs of radicalization, and to expose the networks in our society that support radicalization.This commission will be used to develop new protocols for local police officers, federal investigators, and immigration screeners.”-Donald Trump
I hope Mr. Spencer will be able to serve the new Trump administration in an official capacity befitting of his vast knowledge and expertise in regards to the subject of radical Islam. I can think of no one more eminently qualified to serve the new administration in pursuit of their policy objectives concerning radical Islam.
abbas says
I like trump and he should be the present of USA
he is a big time moron and will be very helpful in Satan USA destruction
USA has declared war against Islam in duplicity by attacking 9 Muslims countries since 2001 .
99.99% Muslims do not support USA created Isis etc but they are being attacked non stop by Jewish controlled USA !!
trump declaration of war against Islam will help these 99.99% see their real enemy clearly and real hand behind Islam two biggest enemies Israeli Jews and USA created, supported terrorist groups like Isis etc…..
Eirene says
WTF ?????????!!!!!!!!!
efoc says
Come on, time for those pills again.
Angemon says
And this is supposed to be a bad thing because leftist dogma holds that all and any extremism is bad. No wonder they have to resort to silencing others – their ideas are stupid.
David says
Congratulations Mr Trump, you have hit the nail dead on. Note that all of the comments are positive !
Frank Livingston says
I suggest folks start researching the Center for Security Policy website and read the excellent material they have for you on Shariah/Islamic law.
The Center for Security Policy New ‘Terror Jihad Reader Series’ Lays Bare The True Nature And Danger Of The Islamic State | August 1, 2016 As the savage attacks claimed by the Islamic State (IS) seem to follow on one another at an ever-increasing pace, too many still do not understand what this group is, where it came from, who its leaders are, and most important of all, why they do what they do. Whether the IS-controlled territory called “The Caliphate” survives in its current form or not, the totalitarian ideology Islamic supremacists call Sharia and the jihad it impels will cause adherent fighters, followers and supporters around the world to fight on and, unless decisively defeated, to continue to metastasize.
Speaking on the timeliness of this critical new book, Center for Security Policy President Frank J. Gaffney noted:
For much of the past fifteen years, the United States has been preoccupied with the threat posed by al Qaeda (AQ). More recently, attention has preponderantly shifted to what began as an AQ splinter group, the Islamic State. Ilana Freeman’s new monograph, Jihad!, makes plain why the object of this new focus needs both to be better understood, utterly crushed and recognized as just one part of the global jihad movement – which must get the same treatment. It should be considered required reading, especially for those who seek to be our next Commander-in-Chief and charged with protecting this country against such enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Jihad! Understanding the Threat of the Islamic State in America is available for purchase in Kindle and paperback format at Amazon.com. As with all of the Center’s other publications, this one can also be downloaded for free at http://www.SecureFreedom.org.
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2016/08/01/book-release-jihad-understanding-the-threat-of-the-islamic-state-in-america/
Creole Gumbo says
Everyone attempting to enter the USA should undergo extreme vetting; and how do you know that they are telling the truth? Will they all be hooked up to lie detectors? They are going to lie because that is what Muslims do, that is what they do in the name of jihad.
Many things need to be done, the first of which is to declare that Islam is not a religion as religions are recognized in our legal system. This is to avoid the accusations of religious discrimination that will come about under a differential vetting process and to prevent them from obtaining privileges that our society affords religions.
The second thing is to recognize that Muslims lie in order to promote and expand Islam. It is called Taqiyya. They are going to lie! Questions that depend on truthful answers will not work.
Third, the country need to be educated about Islam, and not by the Saudi’s as is done now.
The easiest strategy to defend legally at this time is to call a complete moratorium on all immigration. We did that in the 1920s and there is no law that commands us to take any immigrants from any country. We are on sound legal grounds for barring any group of people from entering the USA.
Richard Paulsen says
Donald Trump compared Hillary Clinton to Angela Merkel. Very accurate comparison, I think.
Hoping she will not win being as longlived on her post as the german chancellor on hers winning even the election 2020.
The worse possible scenario. The worse two leaders threatening U.S.A. and Europe.
duh swami says
How’s this for an extreme vetting…Can you say ‘F**K Allah’? If not, you can’t come in…
Mirren10 says
Or, ”F**K mohammed’ ? Maybe we could make them draw a cartoon.
Emilie Green says
Muslim Americans?
Like unicorns, they don’t exist. Neither do Muslim British, or Muslim Canadians, or Muslim French, and so forth. So maybe they have in hand all the paperwork of superficial citizenship, but all of that would have been falsely, fraudulently, obtained through lying.
Muslims prove this point over and over again. And they state it over and over as well. Namely, that they are loyal only to Islam, and to nothing else. Affirmed by the Orlando shooter, by the Fort Hood murderer, by the Boston Bombers, by the Paris Bombers, by the 911 hijackers, and on and on. Explaining why Muslims can never be trusted and never be considered loyal Americans, British, Canadians, French, Italian, Australian, and so forth. They represent an enemy living among us.
Here in America, as elsewhere, Muslims are out for colonization and conquest. They cannot be considered Americans because of their adoption of Islam, and their wish to impose it on us. By force, since they will follow their 1400-year practice, should we decline their we-won’t-be-taking-no-for-an-answer “offer” to adopt Islam. Shariah (total government) and American constitutional principles (government contained/controlled by the people) couldn’t be farther apart. To the Muslim no man-made law could ever be superior to the Shariah considered by them to come directly from their Allah.
Is it possible to conceive of a Muslim American? No way. At best and at most they can only be described as “Muslims who live in North America,” but they are not Americans in the heart, where it counts.
Perhaps the USCCB likes playing the wizard sputtering nonsense to pay no attention to Muslim behavior and to continue “interfaith dialogue,” but growing numbers, many Catholics, are awakening. I’m gladdened to see more and more real Americans are seeing Islam & Muslims for the dangers that they are.
mortimer says
Questions for Polygraph testing of Muslims:
1) Do you believe Sharia law has precedence over American law?
2) Do you believe Muslims have a duty to impose Sharia law over the American constitution?
3) Do you believe there is an organized, militant group of Muslims fighting to create Muslim societies that is inspired by Allah?
4) Which one? (Read list).
dumbledoresarmy says
Keep it simple.
Just don’t let in anybody who carries a passport issued by *any* OIC country…
The *only* exception being bona fide and thoroughly-vetted members of non-Islamic oppressed minority groups from said countries. E.g. Copts from Egypt, Maronites from Lebanon, Christians (various stripes) from Iraq and Syria, and Hindus, Christians and Buddhists fleeing from places like Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia. Groups such as Barnabas Fund, and members of the relevant emigre communities (e.g emigre Copts, such as Raymond Ibrahim) already present in the West, could be called upon to identify, vet and sponsor/ vouch for candidates for admission. Such bodies know exactly who is who – where people are from, who they are related to, their family trees back for generations. They would know the right sort of questions to ask. NO Muslims to be permitted anywhere *near* the processing of applicants. An extra layer of security could be provided by requiring residency of, say, twelve years in the host country, before citizenship can be gained; and by making it plain that any Muslim who managed to slip in by pretending to be what they weren’t, would be given the boot, the instant that their imposture was detected.
Daniel Triplett says
What about Muslim citizens with Passports/Visas from non-OIC nations? Or Muslim citizens of our Allies? Or Muslims who are American citizens living among us?
The problem is ‘yuge.’
Mirren10 says
”What about Muslim citizens with Passports/Visas from non-OIC nations? Or Muslim citizens of our Allies? Or Muslims who are American citizens living among us?”
One must start somewhere.
Daniel Triplett says
dumblesdoresarmy is one of the smartest minds on here, whom I’ve always respected since our first exchange years ago.
I was just interested in his ideas on the issues I mentioned. I wasn’t being facetious.
I agree with you though: We must start somewhere. Launching 21 nukes tonight would be premature. We have much to do first, such as get Donald Trump elected and form an Alliance with Israel, UK, France, China, India, and Russia (non-Muslim nuke states). Then define our Allied objectives, end goals, and develop a war plan. Then broadcast our terms to the enemy, hoping they wise-up, see their goals are untenable, and get on board with the program without firing a shot.
But they see they’re winning this war, because they are, so it won’t be this easy. We’ll need to show them an overwhelming show of force first to earn their fear and respect.
This conflict will only be reconciled with nuclear weapons though. The scope and scale is just too large now. We neither have the money, military, nor will to invade and occupy 57 Muslim countries indefinitely. We can either wait for the Muslims to use nukes on us first, which the Iranians promise to do. Or, we can be smart about it and hit DAR al-Islam first. We should lean on China to eliminate N Korea’s nuke arsenal.
If someone is pointing a loaded gun at you, you’re not required to wait until he pulls the trigger before killing him first.
“Total War: Extinguishing Islam from Earth” by Daniel Triplett
https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e
Mirren10 says
”dumblesdoresarmy is one of the smartest minds on here, whom I’ve always respected since our first exchange years ago.
I was just interested in his ideas on the issues I mentioned. I wasn’t being facetious.”
I didn’t think you were being facetious, Daniel, at all. (By the way, dda is a she, not a he 🙂 )
Very good article; I agree with you.
Mirren10 says
My husband is a retired Parachute Regiment officer. He agrees with you as well.
Now we just have to find some leaders with balls and spines. Do you think Mr. Trump has them ?
Daniel Triplett says
@Mirren10
Hi Mirren.
So dda is a lady… Ah, that helps to explain her superior eloquence and articulation skills. Women will always be better with language than men, no matter how hard we try.
My apologies to dda for mistaking her gender.
Please extend my gratitude to your husband for going the distance with his career. We only live once, and devoting one’s life to defending the Free World is a most honorable way to spend it. Freedom is a cause worth fighting and dying for.
Although I spent 12 years Active Duty, and not the full 20, I know how hard his service must have been on you too, because I myself lost a marriage during my service in the war. Thank’s for your sacrifice. All the deployments and war stress aren’t easy on the wife back home. 70% of all war vets come home to an empty house and a wife who’s left him, taken his children with her. Within 5 years of returning home, 90% of all war vets are divorced. This helps explain the high suicide rate. More vets die at their own hands than die in combat. 22 American veterans take their own lives every day.
Anyway, I definitely believe Donald J. Trump (with whom I’m proud to share the same three Initials) has both the spine and balls to lead America during WWIII, and the epic confrontation we face. I believe he gets it. I believe he gets the whole thing. If he were to say today that “Islam” is our enemy, minus the ‘Radical’ BS, he’d never get elected. Americans aren’t quite ready to hear it yet, but they will be soon when the time is right next year.
This is going to be a tough climb for all of us to get this man elected. The MSM wants to destroy him, and Hillary’s made of Teflon. None of her cornucopia of lies, felonies, and malfeasance seem to affect her in the polls. The American Electorate is the problem though, not her. She’s just one more example of a know-nothing fool getting elected by fools who know even less.
As I’ve posted before, the future of the Free World and Civilization hinges on the upcoming three debates. DJT far out-classes her in debating skills. I’m hoping he totally kicks her ass, exposing Hillary for the evil, con-artist fraud that she is. When Americans see them face-off on stage, I’m praying they choose Freedom and Virtue, instead of a misguided and dangerous loyalty to the Democrat cards in their wallets.
Mirren10 says
Hi, Daniel, thank you for your reply.
”Please extend my gratitude to your husband for going the distance with his career. We only live once, and devoting one’s life to defending the Free World is a most honorable way to spend it. Freedom is a cause worth fighting and dying for.”
Indeed. Although I have to say my husband is absolutely **enraged** with the government that is now trying to smirch and punish the Paras, over Bloody Sunday. ( My husband was there, a very young squaddie, but with all his wits about him. His comments about the Devlin bitch are sulphurous.) He sees himself as a **subject of the Queen**, not a ‘citizen’. 🙂
”Although I spent 12 years Active Duty, and not the full 20, I know how hard his service must have been on you too, because I myself lost a marriage during my service in the war. Thank’s for your sacrifice.”
I’m so sorry to hear about your marriage, Daniel. It must have been very painful. However, I must be very honest here, I’m an army brat,, and my family, on both sides, has long had the armed forces as a career, so there was really no sacrifice involved; it’s simply what we were brought up with. I don’t deny I missed my husband madly, and worried myself sick, but it was all part and parcel of his life, his career, what I knew was part of him before I married him.
I’m glad to hear your endorsement of Mr. Trump. Whilst I don’t think he is the perfect candidate, I agree with your assessment of him as the *only* candidate who gets it about islam, and therefore, the only candidate any American who cares about their country, and Western Civilisation, could possibly vote for. Let’s hope he wins !
Daniel Triplett says
@Mirren10
My goodness Mirren. I don’t blame you and your husband at all for being totally pissed off about having his whole life and career be judged by ONE DAY over 44 years ago.
Growing up in America, I often heard Bono whine all the time with his “Sunday, Bloody Sunday” anthem. But I never really understood the background or animosity. From what little I’ve just read about it though, your husband’s Para Regiment appear to be pawns in the middle of a non-stop political witch-hunt ever since, with blame being assigned, then re-assigned, depending on who was in charge of Parliament.
Although your Queen honored (honoured) most of the Para Officers six months after the event with awards, she’s nontheless refrained from doing much at all to squelch the controversy since. And for a life and career devoted to defending her Kingdom, I can certainly empathize with your husband’s resentment.
With stooges even as recently as Blair and Cameron essentially calling out the Paras as murderers, the white-hot anger your husband feels would be impossible to extinguish. It’s refreshing to hear it from your truthful point of view for a change, rather than from some wealthy punk in an Irish band.
Similarly, after being shot at for 6 years straight and watching many of our finest American Patriots die, I too seethe with anger when Americans, including my own brother, call us war criminals in an unjust war (to the delight and encouragement of our enemies killing us), only to then watch Caliph Ohammad egress all US Forces overnight, handing the territory for which we fought and died over to demons who became our mortal enemies. I’ve never met a US Military Officer who respects Obama.
The whole Status of Forces Agreement excuse was complete horseshit and lie from the beginning. A POTUS who’s ever had the balls to wear his country’s uniform, or even studied history, understands the WINNERS are the sole authors of the SOFA. The losers have no say in the matter whatsoever, other than to salute and say, “Yes Sir, anything you say Sir.” Just ask the Japanese how that process works.
As far as I’m concerned, the Paras were honorable in action on that infamous 1972 day.
Americans, I included, never really understood the Catholic/Protestant violence in the UK. They’re all Christians after all. I agree with the Protestant point of view, and my whole family is Episcopal, but I attended and enjoyed a Catholic boys High School. Catholics and Protestants have always co-lived quite peacefully where I was raised. But I realize there’s a bitter back story that no one could really understand unless you’ve lived it yourself. Even though St. Patrick’s Day is a fun, jovial, drinking day in America, I’ve been in England several times on 17 March and have noticed that NOBODY is wearing green or partying it up.
Largely because of the Catholic/Protestant bitterness of the Irish and British, with the British being our best friends in the World, I’ve always called myself “Christian,” devoted entirely to Him, minus any sub-divisions that man has placed on His glory. My military dog tags have always said Christian, and in combat, I’ve always considered myself a Crusader for His people and His Earth.
Perhaps now that ALL Christians of every stripe are targeted by Islamic, demonic evil, we can shake hands, bury our differences, and join together with the Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists to eliminate Islam forever.
Stay strong my Allied Friend. We have a yuge fight ahead of us.
Jaladhi says
There should be a total ban on Muslim immigration. As Muslims lie all the time there is no way they can be vetted properly! Just keep them out – there are already enough traitors here.
Don McKellar says
“Reading directly from a TelePrompter, a subdued Trump rarely departed from his script.”
You would never read that about Obama, though that has been his entire presidency.
Watching You says
They cannot be trusted. I would not trust their responses as lying is an acceptable way to protect
their religion’s mission.
Daniel Triplett says
Islam is a criminal enterprise dressed up as a religion. It’s a long list of very serious felonies, with Sedition and Conspiracy to Murder right at the top of the list. We’re not required to tolerate it or consider it a “religion” simply because a 7th Century psychopath said so. Muhammad would be in a Federal Penitentiary on Death Row were he to be alive today. Unless of course Obama was in charge, in which case Muhammad would be in Gitmo, repatriated prior to 20 JAN 2017 to the country of his choice.
We must make the “practice or promotion” of Islam a capital offense Worldwide.
We have not the time, money, nor method to “extremely vet” or sort out the good Muslims from the bad ones. Neither did our grandfathers have the time, money, nor method to sort out the Nazi Germans from the good Germans. It’s impossible.
There are no “good” Muslims. Anyone buying into Islam has a heart and soul manipulated by demons.
They’re trained liars doing whatever it takes, in the name of Allah, to advance the Caliphate Worldwide. NEVER trust one.
During the Spanish Inquisition, when Monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella tried to eject every last Muslim from the Spanish Kingdom, the Muslims even participated in Catholic Mass in order to deceive and blend in, under the full authority and permission of Islam. They took part in Catholic Rituals and Rites, and ACCEPTED THE HOLY EUCHARIST. So how could we possibly devise any sort of “Vetting Test” for people willing to do that?
They’re master deceivers, all in order to spread Islam.
Islam is impossible to contain, keeping the bad guys “over there.” Islam must be extinguished entirely from Earth by making its practice or promotion a crime and capital offense everywhere.
Raja says
Thanks for the educative comment. Agree with you that Vetting would be no solution at all for the deceptive and supremacist Islam practitioners/faithful.
Raja says
Daniel,
Thanks for the educative comment. Agree with you that Vetting would be no solution at all for the deceptive and supremacist Islam practitioners/faithful.
Daniel Triplett says
Yes Raja, our grandfathers in WWII had not the money, time, nor method to sort out the good from the bad Japanese and Germans. So we bombed every Japanese and German man, woman, and child in sight until they surrendered unconditionally.
Of course now though, our Western leadership consider themselves more intelligent and morally superior to our grandfathers. But the opposite is true.
Our grandfathers knew how to win wars, and fast. More people die when wars drag on for years.
The two nuke strikes on Japan saved 1,000,000 American lives AND 2,000,000 Japanese lives.
Trinity, the first atomic weapon test, was on 16 JUL 1945. The Hiroshima strike was less than 3 weeks later on 6 AUG 1945.
If our grandfathers had atomic weapons on 7 DEC 1941, would they have waited 3 1/2 years, sacrificing 407,300 of our finest, bravest Americans before using them? Of course not. They weren’t stupid.
We’d best develop the stomach and will to do the same.
Champ says
Daniel wrote:
There are no “good” Muslims. Anyone buying into Islam has a heart and soul manipulated by demons.
They’re trained liars doing whatever it takes, in the name of Allah, to advance the Caliphate Worldwide. NEVER trust one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wholly agree, Daniel.
Havoc says
“No Muslims. No Mosques”
.
Works every time
Jay Boo says
But the elite ask,
Isn’t Trump “too Extreme” … ?
Compared to what … Obama?
Obama is so far to the Left he should be on a (No Fly List).
Mapguy says
I’ll bet that Israeli interrogators could come up with a test.
Champ says
Unsurprisingly, the Washington Post is enraged, along with the rest of the mainstream media, and is doing all it can to discredit and defeat Trump.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of course these enablers of evil islam are taking aim at the WRONG enemy …
And these wrongheaded traitors ALL need to move to some islamic hellhole and rot there–good riddance!
Champ says
TRUMP / TRUTH is creating quite a stir …BRAVO, Brave Sir!
Champ says
…hey that rhymes, lol! 😀
linnte says
Champ haiku! Hahahah! Love it!
Champ says
♥ 🙂
Iftikhar Ahmad says
Well you haven’t read Sharia law, you’ll see how it talks about equality for woman, which was something revolutionary in 600 AD. brutality to women? there are more laws protecting women. I just think Sharia is misunderstood and the word is used in a derogatory manner way too often.
Sharia is a moral and religious code which affects everything from a believer’s personal hygiene to diet and finance. In terms of the latter, it prohibits acceptance of specific interest (known as riba) or fees for loans of money, whether the payment is fixed or floating. To comply with Sharia, any loan must be Qard (free of profit)’. This therefore excludes student loans, which accrue interest (albeit, at a very low rate, equivalent to the rate of inflation).
There is not a strictly codified uniform set of laws that can be called Sharia. It is considered a system of several laws, based on the Qur’an, Hadith and centuries of debate, interpretation and precedent. Attempts to implement Sharia law have been met with opposition globally. There is no consensus between Islamic schools of thought on how far-reaching Sharia law should be.
In Islam, I would like to tell that we don’t have any conflicts between science and our religion. On the contrary, many of new science theories proves that our holy book ‘Quran’ must be from Allah, this is because it tells us with science facts that has been discovered only recently. Although Quran is from 14 centuries, it has many signs that earth is spherical, in addition is has signs about the Big Bang theory of the universe creation, in addition it has many science facts about the stages of women pregnancy and how the child is created, and a lot of other things that tell us that the Quran must be from the God.Sharia law is found in all countries in the world even in the country that hate Muslims more i.e. Israel- You seem to confuse penal law in sharia which only applies to Muslims and no one else with day to day on how Muslims should live. Sharia law is only for Muslims I can not see where the problem is.:
Sharia law is divided into three main sections:
Faith (Aqida).Ethics (Akhlaq).the acts of Muslim which divided into two sections;- The acts of worship, or al-ibadat, these include: Ritual Purification (Wudu)Prayers (Salah)Fasts (Swam and Ramadan)Charities (Zakat)Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj) Human interaction, or al-mu’amalat, which includes: Financial transactions Endowments Laws of inheritance Marriage, divorce, and child care Foods and drinks (including ritual slaughtering and hunting)Penal punishments Warfare and peace Judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence)
Sharia, or Islamic law, offers moral and legal guidance for nearly all aspects of life – from marriage and divorce, to inheritance and contracts, to criminal punishments. Sharia, in its broadest definition, refers to the ethical principles set down in Islam’s holy book (the Quran) and examples of actions by the Prophet Muhammad (sunna). The Islamic jurisprudence that comes out of the human exercise of codifying and interpreting these principles is known as fiqh. Muslim scholars and jurists continue to debate the boundary between sharia and fiqh as well as other aspects of Islamic law.
Please do me a favour and show us where in the sharia law it says you can commit rape? because I know 100% you will not be able to find it. the media are brainwashing a lot of people, open your eyes to the real truth. Islam is about peace, something the media doesn’t portray. why don’t you take the time and effort to talk to a well known and respected Muslim scholar before you start writing utter nonsense? Back your theories up with facts!!! you wouldn’t though, would you, because you’ll never find your theories in the sharia law.
Women were not allowed to inherit property before Islam. Many girls were killed shortly after being born (just like in India today). These are a couple of the improvements Islam bought to women. There are many more. Please don’t generalise from your ignorance. Sharia’s incorporates Islamic practice (prayers, fasting, pilgrimage, charity, Shahadah), civil law, and criminal law. To what do you object? Prayer? Civil law (people are entitled to resolve their civil law differences by whatever means they like, in the UK)?
Thousands of Muslims are turning to them to help resolve family, financial and commercial problems in accordance with Sharia principles. It is a Growing demand. An estimated 85 Sharia councils could be operating in Britain, according to a 2009 report by the think tank Civitas. Several bodies like the Islamic Sharia Council have seen a large increase in their cases in the past five years. “Our cases have easily more than tripled over the past three to five years,” says Sheikh al-Haddad. “On average, every month we can deal with anything from 200 to 300 cases. A few years ago it was just a small fraction of
that. “Muslims are becoming more aligned with their faith and more aware of what we are offering them,” he explained. But while a demand for Sharia continues in Britain, Sheikh Haitham al-Haddad says the practice cannot be banned. “We are not forcing people to walk through our doors. They are voluntarily coming to us,” he said. “If you ban us, then British Muslims will find somewhere else to go. “Many will go to Muslim countries abroad, where there will be no way to protect them.
The principles of Sharia govern all aspects of a Muslim’s life. It is derived from a combination of sources including the Koran, the Hadith, which is based on the example of the prophet Muhammad, and fatwas, which are rulings of Islamic scholars. As a demand for Sharia thrives, a number of British law firms are starting to tap into the booming market. Muslim Lawyer Aina Khan has launched one of the first Sharia departments at her London-based law firm. She offers clients advice that is in keeping with both English and Islamic law. “I am surprised that the majority of people that I am dealing with are under the age of 50. They are British Muslims who want to satisfy their British identity as well as their Muslim one. “So I give them solutions to their problems that satisfy both legal systems all under one place.” Sharia judges hear cases in which Muslims volunteer to accept their rulings.
IA
http://www.londonschoolofislam.org.uk
KnowThyEnemy says
Iftikhar, watch this video-
Champ says
Great video!! Thank you for posting it!
Mirren10 says
You’re wasting your time, mohammedan.
All of us here know what your ‘sharia’ says, your koran, your hadiths, and your foul ‘prophet’.
Piss off and vomit your inept dawa elsewhere, you won’t get any takers here.
linnte says
We HAVE read your Shari’a and we reject it. I have Islamic Law book on my internet device and have read it. I have “Reliance of the Traveller” right here next to me, and I have read it. Go away liar. Taqyyia wielding Muslims make me sick. Islam will be eradicated in the West and all Mosques destroyed. Muhammad has deceived you because he was a liar too. The truth is in God’s Word, and the Word became FLESH and dwelt among men.
Champ says
“…and the word is used in a derogatory manner way too often.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not often enough! ..sharia sucks m’kay!
GET LOST.
Michael Johnson says
I’m not a trump supporter but I agree we should check who’s coming in the country because we don’t know what people are thinking are where their loyalty lies its not a Democrat or Republican issue its an American issue both parties should share the same goal
KnowThyEnemy says
Yes it is an American issue but the Democrats, who have been ruling for the last 7.5 years, have actually been on the side of the enemy! The establishment Republicans have been not much better either.
For this reason if we want this issue be taken seriously, we have no option but to vote for Trump whether we like him or not! If the Democrats win, they are absolutely going to make us compromise our values and principles to appease the Muslims!