• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UCLA and California Muslim judge lie about Jihad Watch

Aug 21, 2016 12:54 am By Robert Spencer

Halim Dhanidina

Here is an interesting letter recently sent to UCLA’s Center for Near Eastern Studies:

“Lying Muslim Judge,” Islamophilia Watch, August 13, 2016:

To the Center for Near Eastern Studies, 10286 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1480. Tel: 310-825-1181 • Email: cnes@international.ucla.edu

Dear sir or madam:

I read with interest the story of a Muslim judge in California on your web site at http://www.international.ucla.edu/cnes/article/163271.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Halim Dhanidina writes that when he was appointed a judge in 2012 the website “Jihad Watch.com” published the news under the headline “Sharia Law Judge Appointed in Mexifornia.”

I was curious to see what grounds that Islamophobe site could cite for calling Judge Dhanidina “a Sharia law judge”, so I searched for the article, but in vain, alas! On Jihad Watch there was only one mention of “Mexifornia”, but it was in a different story.

Eventually I found the article using the judge’s name. However the article says nothing about a “Sharia law judge” and nothing about “Mexifornia”. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/07/californias-first-muslim-superior-court-judge-founded-chapter-of-muslim-brotherhood-linked-muslim-st?doing_wp_cron=1471129911.0394880771636962890625

It merely says that as a student, Dhanidina founded a branch of the Muslims Students Association, which is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, an extremist religious-political organization that has proclaimed that its “work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
Please correct your web site.

Sincerely,
Zenobia van Dongen

Remark:
This lying Mohammedan scumbag Dhanidina invented a bigoted-sounding headline that combines slurs both against Chicanos and against Mohammedans. This is part of the ceaseless campaign of lies that jihadis constantly spew forth to make people believe that the widespread hatred for Islam is “same hate, different group”, i.e., is just baseless prejudice….

The idea that the headline “Sharia Law Judge Appointed in Mexifornia” was invented in order to imply that concern about jihad terror is the equivalent of racial prejudice seems eminently plausible — after all, that’s what Hamas-linked CAIR and its allies routinely claim.

But Dhanidina’s claim that Jihad Watch ever ran such a headline is false. Nor would we ever have. Mexicans in California is not the focus of this site, and the only time the word “Mexifornia” has ever appeared on this site was in a comment not written by me or any other Jihad Watch writer. Here is the proof.

The only time Halim Dhanidina was mentioned on this site was in connection with his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which, interestingly enough, UCLA doesn’t mention.

So will Halim Dhanidina retract his claim about Jihad Watch? Will UCLA correct its article?

I doubt it. Leftists need have no concern for truth, as they never have any accountability: any lies they tell about those to whom they feel superior morally are acceptable as far as they are concerned.

Here is the Google Cache of the UCLA page, containing the lie about Jihad Watch.

Dhanidina lies

Here is the UCLA story that prompted the letter above:

“For Muslim Americans, says L.A. judge, ‘Every time you hit bottom, there’s a new bottom,’” by Peggy McInerny, UCLA International Institute, March 21, 2016:

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Halim Dhanidina, the first Muslim judge in the State of California, recently spoke to UCLA students about his career and why he continues to be publicly engaged.

I think I’m one of six Muslim judges in the country at any level. Once people see you in these positions, it sort of demystifies it — I don’t think that any juror or attorney in my courtroom sees me as a Muslim judge.”…

By the time he was appointed a judge by California Governor Jerry Brown in 2012, the atmosphere was even more fraught. Two days after the press release announcing his appointment as California’s first Muslim judge was published, for example, he was featured prominently on the website “Jihad Watch.com” under the headline “Sharia Law Judge Appointed in Mexifornia.”

“It shook me — it was the first time that I heard such negative opinions of me by people I didn’t even know,” he related. Rather than pull back and simply do his job as a legal professional, however, Dhanidina chose to become an active public speaker. He felt a responsibility to provide a counter-narrative to popular rhetoric about Muslims and spoke — and continues to speak — at community groups, schools, law schools, and multicultural and non-denominational groups. It comes as a surprise to many such audiences, he noted ruefully, that he is sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States and knows nothing about Sharia law….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", claiming victim status, Featured, journalistic bias, War is deceit Tagged With: Halim Dhanidina, UCLA


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Kay says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 1:43 am

    I’m sorry Robert Spencer.
    And I can’t even figure out a way to make an excuse for him (which I’m good at doing, for good or ill).
    If he heard he was mentioned in an article at JW, he would have read it just to see what it said. So he knew better.
    He lied. He got away with it for some time and maybe swayed some opinions and I guess directed attention away from the Muslim Brotherhood ties.
    I’m just sorry.

    • Saleem Smith says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 2:50 am

      He is a devout Muslim. Therefore it is a given that protecting and promoting Islam is his top priority. The Judge claims to know nothing about Sharia law…..lol

      The guy is clearly a liar and a deceiver. He most certainly knows that Sharia law is derived exclusively from the Qur’an and Muhammad’s Sunnah. What else could it be derived from?

      We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is a 7th century fraud that needs to be throw into the dustbin of history. Mohammed the prophet of Islam is arguably the most evil human being to have ever supposedly lived.

      Hadith: Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Bk. 52, No.196:

      Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah ‘s Apostle said, ” I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ and whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)”

      Hadith: Sahih Muslim 4294:

      “When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to 3 courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also except it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya (the Islamic tax). If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.” – Muhammad

      Qur’an 009:029: Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given as believe neither in God nor the Last Day, who do not forbid what God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who do not embrace the true Faith, until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued.

      Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

      “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

      The statement continues,

      Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

      http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Main_Page

      • Saleem Smith says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 3:49 am

        Bye the way, just to clarify, I am not Robert Spencer. I just jumped the Q in the comments section of JW cause I am an ex-Muslim and know that Islam is a lie.

        • Tim says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 12:52 pm

          Saleem Smith, since you mentioned Hitler and Stalin in your post you may be interested in a book I found on Amazon called “Satan’s Trinity; Hitler, Stalin,Mohammad”……pretty good read…………..thanks for your input on JW

        • Kepha says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 8:36 pm

          Saleem:

          Those of us who have been reading JW for a number of years now recognize your name. Good to hear from you again–but it’s “jumping the queue” if you mean you’re butting into a place in line closer to the front, not “jumping the Q”.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 10:11 pm

          Thank you for all your contributions here, Saleem.

        • John Stefan says

          Aug 22, 2016 at 5:25 pm

          Please make your comments here Saleem as often as you want and can. You know, as we say, “It’s good to hear it from the horse’s mouth.” if you don’t mind me to say it that way. God, the true God, bless you and your family and Robert and Pamela and many other of our leaders and God bless our nation and world because if the cancer of Islam continues to spread, we’re in serious trouble and our children.

      • old white guy says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 6:52 am

        the judge is just another muslim liar.

        • john spielman says

          Aug 22, 2016 at 10:51 am

          so aren’t muslims supposed to LIE to unbelievers?

    • J D S says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 8:44 am

      If this so calledf judge has ties to the Muslim brotherhood a Hamas backed organization or is it the other way round, then he should never have been able to one within a Mike e of a judges bench……nuf said!

      • J D S says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 8:45 am

        Mike?????….mile

        • mach37 says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 4:06 pm

          “one within a Mike” – maybe that should read “come within a mile” ???

  2. Randy says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 2:26 am

    File charges of ethical misconduct and invite all news outlets and bloggers to attend.

    Randy

    • DefenderofIslm says

      Aug 22, 2016 at 9:05 am

      I donot think Robert Spencer have any ground as Robert attack the judge accused in of bring than Islamist law judge before he make any legal ruleing on any case before him. So Robert is in the wrong here. It alot like Trump attacking the honor of the Mexican-American federal judge who will on the faud case against Trump.

      • ChristianInDeed says

        Aug 22, 2016 at 1:12 pm

        WHAT? Any chance you could rewrite your post, DefenderofIslm?
        As it stands, it makes perfect nonsense! As does your stance on the reality of the situation!

        • DefenderofIslm says

          Aug 23, 2016 at 8:23 am

          Robert accused the judge of apply islamist law in his court room. Trump attack the federal judge who is going to rule on the faud case against. The judge so happen is than Mexican- American who was born in America wrong tactic to use. The judge will most likely rule against Trump.I remony along time ago two upung aduld decided to beat up than elderly man on than golf course they where arrested for than other crime they wealthy partent want the out on bail. The judge hearing bail have broken ribs and broken arm.When the hearing start the judge said I remember you two beat me up on the golf course no bail for either of you.No other judge want to grant bail.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 22, 2016 at 9:41 pm

        “DefenderofIslm”–who is so illiterate that he is unable to spell the name of his own foul creed–wrote:

        I donot (sic) think Robert Spencer have (sic) any ground (sic) as Robert attack the judge accused in (sic) of bring (sic) than (sic) Islamist law judge before he make any legal ruleing (sic) on any case before him.
        ……………………………

        Where to start? Firstly, this judge was appointed in 2012–is “DefenderofIslm” saying that he has not made a single ruling in the past four years?

        More to the point is that Robert Spencer was not referring to any of Halim Dhanidina’s rulings, in any case. This article is about his having lied about the story in Jihad Watch, which is easily proven here; the initial story was about his having founded a branch of the Muslims Students Association, which is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is entirely factual.

        More:

        So Robert is in the wrong here.
        ……………………………

        No–everything Robert Spencer has said here is entirely factual. But one cannot expect a Mohammedan to be able to follow reason.

        • EYESOPEN says

          Aug 22, 2016 at 9:52 pm

          Spot-on Graven!

        • DefenderofIslm says

          Aug 23, 2016 at 9:00 am

          So by being than member of the MSA make you than terrorists. First Robert have no legal right to say all member of the. MSA are terrorists he slander all MSA member.

      • 7Delta says

        Aug 23, 2016 at 10:50 am

        Defender, I’m afraid you have the sequence of events backwards. The judge initiated the exchange by dishonestly attacking Jihad Watch and Robert for posting an article that never existed and for making statements Robert never made. It had nothing to do with any of the judge’s rulings. That doesn’t speak very highly of the judge’s integrity, now does it? So, Robert has two legs to stand on…and an archive to prove the judge made erroneous statements.

        As for Trump, again, you are misinformed. The judge he questioned is associated with La Raza and has been officially recognized by La Raza for his support. La Raza, in case you don’t know, is a dubious, supremacist, even subversive/seditious, group that portrays itself as an advocate for Hispanic/Latino civil rights…you know, like CAIR…but La Raza also supports a belief that Hispanic people have a right to reclaim parts of the U.S. they claim were stolen from Mexico. Their tactic is that by flooding the country with illegal Hispanic/Latino immigrants to displace Americans and take over, they will, then, forcibly remove all remaining non-Hispanic people. It’s sort of like a Mexican hizrah. However, apparently neither they, nor you, are aware of the Guadeloupe-Hildago Treaty that legally ceded lands once claimed by Spain/Mexico to the U.S. If these misguided activists have a problem with that completely legal treaty, made between two consenting governments, their beef is with their own government for ceding the land and if they are all in on claiming to be victims of Anglo-oppression, they need to speak with Spain, since Spain occupied Mexico, not the U.S. But then, the truth is simply an inconvenience, when being an imaginary victim sounds much more virtuous than attempting to overthrow the government does.

        The judge Trump questioned has an apparent conflict of interest and should recuse himself from presiding over the case, as all judges should do, if there is any hint of possible impropriety. That would be the ethical and honorable thing for the judge to do.

        Unfortunately, neither of your claims have a leg to stand on. Have you ever thought about defending fact-based truth, you know, the kind that exists in the real world and can be proven, not the kind that exists only in the imaginations and narratives of self-serving, dishonest activists? Being a defender of concrete facts is much more rewarding, but it does require the actual work of digging around until the truth is found. I know, that’s so much work and you risk finding out that what you believe might be wrong. Takes a brave person that values truth over agenda.

  3. Westman says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 2:30 am

    Obviously, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Halim Dhanidina, has lied, or didn’t remember accurately, or was misquoted by a confused reporter, Peggy McInerny.

    So who is corrupt? Dhanidina or McInerny? If I was UCLA, I would be getting to the bottom of this, pronto, because it reflects poorly on the institution regardless of the source/cause of a serious lie. That we 5can still go to the UCLA website and find this fabricated and mendacious accusation means someone is asleep or slander is now a staple at UCLA.

    Yes, there is always a “new bottom”; Dhanidina, McInerny, and UCLA have created and fallen into it.

    As a member of the MSA he “knows nothing about Sharia law.” Oh, please, McInerny,….. stop! If I slap my forehead again I’ll have a zebibah.

  4. Jay Boo says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 2:33 am

    Islam is based on a foundation of despising all others.

    Muslims do this to feel good about themselves, because Islam is never enough.
    The illusion of “Chicanos and Mohammedans” becoming part of a mutual admiration society against bigotry is textbook Muhammad.
    Muhammad ‘befriended’ Pagans in Mecca, Christians in Ethiopia, Jews in Medina then he Robbed, Raped, and Murdered them (in the name of Islam).

    One thing is crystal clear.
    Islam was spawned out of satanic demon seed just like Muhammad.
    Islam’s disgrace — Human waste.

  5. linnte says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 2:53 am

    So then Robert, how can we support you? Email this Judge? Write UCLA? Man, I hate this! I am dumbfounded. This is big stuff actually. How can a Judge meet out Justice if he is a liar?

    Tell us how to help you!

  6. Paul Clark says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 3:27 am

    Can this judge be impeached? Can you sue? Would the Socialist State of California even allow this. I think not. Through ignorance and generations of being educated stupid, they meet the exceptional devious standards of Hillary ,Obama and Brown. No justice will prevail here, except for the haters.

  7. dsinc says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 4:02 am

    All Muslim’s are liars. Islam is riddled with lies which start with the biggest one of all, the existence of Muhammad. The holy prophet of Islam? What a load of hogwash. The biggest lie known to mankind has also caused the most death, destruction and human suffering ever. Get rid of Islam before it destroys another civilization, ours.

  8. Debi Brand says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 4:08 am

    “It comes as a surprise to many such audiences, he noted ruefully, that he is sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States and knows nothing about Sharia law….”

    Yes, indeed, and I’m bett’n, drawing from the same well of “veracity,” he’s neither ever heard of Muhammad, and nor the sunnah of the said so-called prophet nor “the Book” he brought.

    • Lion of Judah's Cub says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 2:11 pm

      Did he swear his oath of office on the koran which supersedes the US Constitution?

  9. duh swami says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 4:34 am

    Is jihad watch .com the same jihad watch as jihad watch.org?

    • Angemon says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 6:45 am

      I was wondering that myself.

    • Westman says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 9:22 am

      Yes, http://www.jihadwatch.com does a re-direct to http://www.jihadwatch.org. Because of the redirect, it takes a little longer for the home page to appear if using the .com URL.

      It’s quite common that an organization site will acquire both the .com and .org Top Level Domain of its name because many people automatically use .com by habit.

    • marc says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 7:57 pm

      It’s identical content on both the .org and .com, with that redirect in place, the muslim judge is just lying, didn’t happen, if it did exist archive.org or google cache would have caught it for eternity. been nearly 24 hours, they still haven’t done a correction.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:14 pm

      jihadwatch.com just redirects to jihadwatch.org. These are not separate sites.

  10. vcragain says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 4:52 am

    “Leftists need have no concern for truth, as they never have any accountability: any lies they tell about those to whom they feel superior morally are acceptable as far as they are concerned.”
    NO Robert – “Leftists” are NOT a single group of people all conspiring in one direction – they are just a bunch of people with SOME like ideas – just as ‘Righties’ are a bunch of people – multiple ideas, multiple beliefs !!! This just puts the author’s core principles into non-respect land. If you have a theory about Islam that you believe in and want to tell people about you should keep it DISTINCT from any other core beliefs you hold, because they are nothing to do with each other !!!!! How are you going to convince all people that your beliefs about Islam have value when you keep insisting that you must be politically Right-Wing if you are reading this website ?? How come I am a ‘Leftie’ which means I believe in ‘social programs’ to fix some of humanity’s core issues & disperse the country’s wealth in a fairer manner than allowing that top 0.0001% to hog all the advantages (ie make THEM pay the same level of taxes as the little guy does !!), but I ALSO believe we have a distinct problem with the subject of Islam as a ‘religion’, and believe it is a threat to Western civilization, the 2 concepts have NOTHING to do with each other !!!! Sorry if you cannot see that then YOU have a problem, and maybe I should start a ‘twin’ website for the Lefties ?

    • duh swami says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 5:16 am

      Hillary needs you…don’t let her down…

    • Ahem says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 6:23 am

      I have to agree with you to some extent.

      When it comes to matters of life or death (universal health care, social safety net) I can come across as far left as anyone in the belief that the state must play a major role. The conflict of interest factor alone demands this. My goodness, I would even throw in minor stuff like dental care. Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone had Hollywood teeth? I would certainly smile more often, except when reading about the most recent muslim atrocity that appears to be occurring every day or so, somewhere or other on this benighted planet.

      The problem is that even left wing lunatics, who can see the benefits of all of these things, drag across, as part of their total belief package, their delusional beliefs that islam is just another normal, harmless religion that can be allied to ‘the movement’, if you get my drift. They believe that muslims are oppressed ‘brown people’, that they behave like lunatics because some bunch of evil white right wing islamophobic people made them do it.

      Unfortunately, many leftists cannot, as part of their ideological make up, see islam as the murder cult that it so obviously is.

      The lunatic fringe, as control freaks, also has the energy and ability to combine and take over organs of propaganda, such as the news media, education, historical societies, university historical faculties, schools of journalism, and political parties at every level. They have faith in their own set of beliefs and that is what makes them so effective in gaining positions of power.

      Remember the (truthful) dictum: The corrupt seek power, the absolutely corrupt seek absolute power.

      Lunacy is the ultimate corruption.

      I agree that Robert should make it clearer that he recognises the fact that lunatics exist across the full spectrum of political belief systems, and perhaps islamophilia should be given a special status among the clinical classifications of mental illness. Regardless, although I agree with you mostly, Robert is speaking sound bite ‘shorthand’, so I’d be inclined to cut him some slack.

      • Les says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 9:22 am

        “The corrupt seek power, the absolutely corrupt seek absolute power”….you just described the DEMONcrat Party which is dominated by lefties

    • Mirren10 says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 7:52 am

      vcragain says

      ”How come I am a ‘Leftie’ which means I believe in ‘social programs’ to fix some of humanity’s core issues & disperse the country’s wealth in a fairer manner than allowing that top 0.0001% to hog all the advantages (ie make THEM pay the same level of taxes as the little guy does !!),”

      First of all, you should be honest.

      No government has any money of its own. The money you glibly say should be spent on ‘’social programs’ to fix some of humanity’s core issues & disperse the country’s wealth in a fairer manner … ” is money derived from those who *work* for a living, through their taxes. *That* is the ‘country’s wealth.’

      What you say sounds very fine and humanitarian on the surface, but what you will get is an underclass who see no reason to work and pay taxes when others will support them. In the UK, we have a vast underclass who have never worked in three generations, take everything from the ‘state’, and think they’re entitled to it.

      • billybob says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 8:33 am

        “is money derived from those who *work* for a living, through their taxes” That is just so naive. Wealth is often inherited. Did you ever consider that? It is often stolen too… or gained by dishonest means. There there are those who come from a privileged background. They have a headstart in the game. Go to the best colleges, their skin is the right colour and the door is always open for them. Did you think of that? Sometimes it represents a windfall, but more often – Insider Trading – in the broadest possible definition of that term. Those who get opportunities to gain wealth belong to the “old boys network”, where they get the inside scoop us plebes never hear of. But it’s not just the accumulation of hard earned money… when it is derived from hard work. Have you ever heard the phrase “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer”. There is a reason for that. People with money have an advantage to gaining more money that poor folk don’t have. The more you got, the more you can get. And do you suppose the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes? Hardly! That is why there needs to be a mechanism for the redistribution of wealth.

        • Jay Boo says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 10:44 am

          Simplistic rationalizations for a sense of entitlement to a free handout.

        • billybob says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 11:31 am

          Mr. Boo says “Simplistic rationalizations for a sense of entitlement to a free handout.”
          Simple, yes. The deck is stacked. The game is rigged. We are not playing on a level playing field. You need to recognize that. And there is corruption everywhere. Example: Just now glanced through an article about Leonardo di Caprio – now very rich. He was supposed to host a $33,400 a plate fundraiser for Hillary, but at last minute, backed out. Why? The Clinton campaign denies the decision is connected to questions DiCaprio and his foundation are facing over ties to a $3 billion embezzlement scheme. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/leonardo-dicaprio-backs-hillary-clinton-921326

          You’ve been had. We have all been had. But where am I asking for a free handout? I work hard, and earn well, thanks to having been born into a good, middle class family in the first place. Thanks to always having enjoyed good health. Thanks to all the advantages I had. However, I recognize there are many who work just as hard – or more likely – much harder than I, and don’t earn half of what I earn. I guess I’m better than these people maybe – you think?

        • Ray M says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 11:45 am

          You got to be joking if you think any politician cares about you. All they care about is them selves getting elected. So they will tell you that they are going to give you money for doing nothing. Stop being so gullible all they care about is sucking you in to vote for them so they can fill their on pockets with money. After they get in do you ever see anything change? Hell no you do not because if you do not have money to give them they have no use for you until next election. Life is not fair get use to it. And if you think a politician is going to tax the rich you have to be deranged. Who do you think pays for their campaign the tooth fairy. They are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. Do not trust anyone and you will never be appointed. Just because a politician says he cares about the little guy is not a reason to believe them. Politicians are the worst liars on earth. You should check out Clinton Money and you will see what politicians care about. You should find it on You tube easily. The only one in the world you can trust is yourself. Question everything and everyone. Think about it, what is in it for them. And all this crap about the privileged, color of skin, on and on is just a waste of your time. All that crap has been going on for ever and you or I or anyone else is going to change it. The only hope that the USA has is that Donald Trump can get the USA back on their on its feet. If Crooked Hillary wins the US is screwed without a doubt in my mind.

        • 7Delta says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 1:29 pm

          What difference does it make if wealth is inherited, billybob? It’s still not the government’s or anyone else’s. If wealth is gained by illegal or dishonest means, then a crime has been committed and there are laws and due process to deal with that. Government can’t right specific wrongs by holding the entire general population accountable and burdening them with a remedy that violates their right to equal justice. Not only are innocent people harmed, but the guilty are relieved of specific accountability. If and when there is a “good old boys network”, it’s always because government benefits from it.

          Yes, some people are born ahead of the game, but that doesn’t guarantee personal success anymore than being born of modest or poor means denies the opportunity to succeed. Both brackets have the same opportunity to succeed or fail. Success and failure are not specific terms that can be defined by government or anyone other than each individual. Success for one person may be a simple life where money is just a bare necessity, while failure may be for another being demoted from a job that pays a million and a half a year to a million.

          Governments that play the game of pitting one demographic against the other are interfering with everyone’s right to “pursue happiness”, thwarting the poor from moving up out of poverty, protecting the wealth of a very few, including their own, and doing it solely to pursue their own ends.

          Personal choices, learning proper morals and principles, quality of education, etc. makes a difference. All things are not relative. That’s life. Government now controls those aspects of man’s natural rights by either narrative, regulation or ignoring or subverting their own laws. Man’s higher nature seeks truth and values the work and character that legally produces each man’s own success, as defined by him or her. Equality of principled opportunity works and our government is obligated to stay out of picking winners and losers, for ensuring that no one is above the law. Is that what they’re doing now? No. Not for a long time. No law or government program can change human nature or guarantee equality of results, but government can and does protect the most base of human nature that benefits them, by misdirecting focus away from its own role in causing the problems they claim to correct.

          When you support the ideology of redistributing wealth and social justice, you are supporting the very people or institutions that created or fostered the problems, in order to manipulate vulnerable people and the general population for political gain. That’s why “social justice” is, and has always been, a ruse to gain power and to concentrate it into the hands of a few. It’s not a new concept. When people are reliant on government, they’re easy to manipulate. Keep them poor, uneducated and angry and you own them. Independent people cannot be controlled. The more control central governments have, the poorer people become. Government serves itself, not the people, when given the opportunity. It’s human nature and humans make up governments. Power is the most seductive of all human drives. If you have power, everything else follows.

          Yes, there will still be poor people in a properly functioning political system with limited central authority, but that doesn’t mean there is no help for them. States, churches, the medical community and private organizations were pretty successful in providing help to the needy prior to government assuming that role. In fact, they were far better at providing temporary aide, then getting people back on their feet. It’s local, its network is local and it’s locally accountable to its citizens and donors. Since government benefits from keeping people poor, there is no motivation for them to work to make people independent, which is why it’s not government’s responsibility to redistribute wealth and why it shouldn’t be. Their role is ensure equal opportunity through equal application of the law.

          What does this have to do with Islam? Refugee Resettlement, for just one. It’s not about refugees, in the conventional sense. It’s about an alien ideology, which is using Islam as a means to an end, and is being unconstitutionally supported from the public treasury to the tune of billions of dollars a year. The “safety nets”, also taken from the public treasury, remain in place for decades for most refugees and other low-skilled immigrants, while our low-skilled citizens are denied their right to be protected from massive competition, so they can climb the ladder. They have been reduced to wards of the state, who are then used to promote the very ideology that put them there to start with. If every penny was redistributed, they would still be in far worse shape than if they have been given the opportunities and principles to succeed in rising out of poverty. They have been sucker punched by a lie and by harmful policies that perpetuate their state. Of course, it behooves ideologues within government to do say or do everything necessary to keep them from discovering that sordid fact.

          A close examination of the RRP and Islam reveals much more and we find that the deceptions and government’s wrongful involvement in falsely portraying and promoting Islam and in engaging in the RRP, as it’s currently operating, is covered by the Constitution in Art. 3, Sec. 3. That’s also why government is, in truth, and should be, “chained down” to the Constitution. This is our chickens coming home to roost for allowing government to shake off its chains, put them on us, and call it compassion. There is no such thing as “social justice” or “redistribution of wealth.” There is only corruption under those false banners or equal justice under the law.

        • Ballantine1979 says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 5:10 pm

          “Those who get opportunities to gain wealth belong to the “old boys network”, where they get the inside scoop us plebes never hear of.”

          yeah, that sounds like millionaire Leftists like Tom Brokaw, Gary Trudeau, George Clooney, Will Smith, Oprah Winfrey, (billionaire) George Soros, Bill & Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Michael Moore…

      • Les says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 9:52 am

        Spot on Mirren10!
        Lefties are petty and jealous of people who succeed and they ignore the vast amount of taxes paid, that the “rich” are the ones doing all the major charitable donations, setting up charities, they are the ones that create 80% of businesses that are small businesses that employ millions of ingrates and that only 10% of theses famly businesses make it to the third generation.

        So it is nothing more than jealous ignorant claptrap that wealth is stolen or only inherited.

        The greatest generation of the 20th century was succeeded by lefties who detested the founding principles of America by their “social” Justice have stolen vast amounts of wealth and have given it to the third generation of MEllenials who have been so polluted by the left and their self love entitlement attitude that there is no hope that America will be great again.

        • Mirren10 says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 10:54 am

          ”So it is nothing more than jealous ignorant claptrap that wealth is stolen or only inherited. ”

          Actually, it’s doctrinaire Marxism.

          As I pointed out to billybob, that’s always worked so well ! 🙂

    • Kay says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:57 am

      vcragain,
      You are in the right place. This website is concerned about the supremacist misogynistic ideology that resorts to violence to “convert”, retain and terrorize others.
      I was never considered “far right” until I became aware of and thus concerned (i.e. terrified) about this ideology. As I see it, the term “far right” is a construction of the mainstream media (possibly with assistance by some other power) intended to disparage our concern, to keep others from listening and to divide the American population.
      People here have all kinds of views but all–with the exception of the “trolls” who are usually called out by one of the regulars– are concerned about that supremacist ideology.
      At the same time, if you started a jihadwatch for lefties, it would be wonderful. Maybe some would listen and learn who can’t bring themselves to it yet. The ignorance about the supremacist ideology among the general population is astounding. I feel at odds with most of my friends and my church because they refuse to become aware of the danger of this supremacist misogynistic ideology. My heart breaks that feminists are silent. I shudder at how this ideology and its powers twist truth. Personally this has thrown me deeper into prayer (regardless that there are those who post here who detest all religions).
      Please stay with the fight. Your place might be different but is important.

    • Kay says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 11:17 am

      On further reflection vcragain, I would say that the “far right” is the new “left”.
      Who has been concerned about the 5-year old who was gang-raped?
      Who is concerned about all the women and children being raped?
      Who cares about the lives of homosexuals?
      Who cares about the rise in anti-semitism?
      Who is paying attention to TB becoming a problem again in western countries?
      Who has been dutifully paying taxes to support social programs and has enough grasp of mathematics to understand that you can’t add hundreds of thousands more completely on the dole and keep serving those downtrodden even to the degree you have been?
      Who wants to protect international historical treasures, often churches, from destruction?
      Who wants to ensure freedom of religion for Hindus, Buddhists and atheists?
      Who wants to protect freedom of speech?
      Who wants to be able to protect you if a shooter comes into your space?
      Does this sound like the “left”?
      These are what is being defined as “far right.”

      • Westman says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 12:40 pm

        Well said, Kay!

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 12:09 pm

      Leftists” are NOT a single group of people all conspiring in one direction – they are just a bunch of people with SOME like ideas…

      The core doctrine of Leftists (aka socialists) is based on a unitary source in Karl Marx, drawing from Das Kapital (a work of economic fraud replete with fake statistics) and The Communist Manifesto.

      The so-called Righties are actually freedom lovers, whose core doctrine derives from a somewhat broader set of thinkers, from Locke to Von Mises.

      There’s a difference. What makes socialists like you such nasty people is that their principles don’t work in the real world, so delusion is substituted. And then there’s the indisputable fact that for every wealth transferred dollar, there’s a bureaucrat running the transaction taking a bit of freedom away. That’s why Uncle Joe killed 30 million and Chairman Mao killed 40 million.

      Then there are the Moslems, where the harm that can be done by socialists, better thought of as globo-socialists, is immeasurable.

    • Kay says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 12:29 pm

      One more thing, vcragain, if you can look at the website thereligionifpeace.com

      Try to get your “leftie” friends to look at it or at least tell them about the statistics and what you find there. There is no commentary, just a collection of news stories from around the world.
      We need the American citizens to wake up– to history, to what’s going on in Europe and Canada, to the threats to our freedoms.
      Thank you for your efforts. I know that it is hard to go against the current (flow).

      • More Ham Ed says

        Aug 21, 2016 at 2:59 pm

        You have a typo in the URL/URI.
        They’re doing a great job documenting facts over at
        http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
        I always toast a ham sandwich in honor of their site.

        • Kay says

          Aug 21, 2016 at 3:07 pm

          Good catch. Thanks.

    • Ballantine1979 says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 5:09 pm

      voragain is half right and half wrong. the problem of people not getting the danger of Islam is not limited to “Leftists” but on the other hand that problem is not totally unrelated to Leftism as voragain claims. The political correctness that protects Muslims by linking them to the Race Card is definitely related to Leftism, but it’s broader than Leftism because so many out there who are not Leftists also believe that political correctness. So both voragain and Robert Spencer are right and wrong on this issue. I wonder if they can meet in the middle lol.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:21 pm

      There are quite a few anti-Jihad Liberals here. I would use the term “hard-Leftists”.

  11. John Billings says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 5:23 am

    Taquiyya, lies, and deceit. This Muslim judge is no judge for me. Just like their “ideal man”, Muhammad, said, “war is deceit”. The leftists are also very good at this. They are all liars, and Obama is the most silver-tongued liar ever. When he says, “Islam is a religion of peace”, he knows that is a lie, but he foists it on the ignorant American public.

    Thank you so much, Mr. Spencer, for writing your articles and books, and for tirelessly working to expose the roots of Islamic jihad. Keep up the good work!

  12. duh swami says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 5:27 am

    All Muslim judges are sharia law judges…If it’s true that you can’t serve two masters, guess what master this judge is serving…

  13. Enough of Jihad says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 6:50 am

    He’s a Muslim and he’s a liar. Why is anyone surprised?
    The only other thing that stands just as true together is Muslim and ignorant.

  14. Jaladhi says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 7:08 am

    All Muslims lie and are liars and this judge is no exception. This is tried and true rule since this cult was invented and Muslims told it was their religious duty to lie to protect their religion and it became lying in all matters as Muslims consider everything we say an attack on their religion. Old habits never die!!

  15. JawsV says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 7:57 am

    Zenobia called Jihad Watch “that Islamophobe site” which shows she’s pretty much of a dodo brain. However, glad she got curious.

  16. R Cole says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 8:07 am

    With these blogs there is an emphasis on accuracy – but for the Left who take their funding from Soros and universities from Arabia and the Arab Gulf states [who ironically are in the business of giving lessons in diversity and inclusiveness] – know that if they can conflate the issue of undocumented Mexicans with problems stemming from the Middle East and Islamic world – they can present a diverse platform of causes that would better appeal to their wealthy benefactors.

    [Joke] More like a seductive belly dance to entice the donors – there’s the Mexico issue on one side of the hips and the so called ‘Islamophobia’ on the other!

    ::

    Jihad Watch should rightly weed out libellous statements – and those written with malicious intent. Such content can be used by the Soros funded group of activists – as a focus of ‘outrage’ and spun by the the media as truths.

    The UCLA must without fail retract the ‘Halim Dhanidina’ false claim made about Jihad Watch.

  17. Mirren10 says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 8:31 am

    ”It comes as a surprise to many such audiences, he noted ruefully, that he is sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States and knows nothing about Sharia law….”

    Lying mohammedan. I hope someone is keeping a close eye on the judgements this pos hands down.

    • Champ says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:20 pm

      “Lying mohammedan” …that phrase has such a natual flow to it, just as muhammad (perdition be upon him) was a *perfect example* of being a lying mohammedan!

      • Mirren10 says

        Aug 23, 2016 at 10:01 am

        🙂 Champ !

      • Keys says

        Aug 23, 2016 at 3:54 pm

        Right, Champ ! Even Allah is a lying Mohammadan.

  18. Mirren10 says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 9:08 am

    ”That is why there needs to be a mechanism for the redistribution of wealth.”

    Yes indeed, Marxism has always worked so well.

    • Mirren10 says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 9:11 am

      That was in reply to ‘billybob’.

    • billybob says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:52 am

      You go to such extremes in your arguments. Nobody, least not me, is suggesting Marxism. I think that is a horrible idea. But as I said, when you looked at the grotesquely skewed demographics… the richest 1 percent in the United States now own more additional income than the bottom 90 percent. The gap between the top 10% and the middle class is over 1,000%; that increases another 1000% for the top 1%.

  19. Abu Nudnik says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 9:15 am

    Please write a post on the method of removing a lying judge from the bench.

  20. Norger says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:20 am

    He’s a judge, yet he can’t be either factually or intellectually honest. Much easier to suggest that he was the “victim,” by falsely attributing a rascist headline (and story) to Robert Spencer than to actually meet the substance of Spencer’s factually accurate story (i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood has a Muslim supremacist agenda and this judge has strong ties to a Muslim Brotherhood sponsored group; the MSA). Hey judge about it, want to give us some truth? Why won’t you talk about the Muslim Brotherhood and the MSA, which is what Spencer’s story was all about? There is nothing more powerful than the truth, your honor.

  21. Karen says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:26 am

    Peggy McIrney, Director of Communications. I’m pretty sure I’ve misspelled her name, but am feeling a bit lazy about doing the minimum fact checking, simply by scrolling upward. Besides, I like this spelling better; it fits my world view. But then, I’m not the Director of Communications.

    Similarly, Peg could have clicked around Jihad Watch for 2 minutes and verified the judge’s story, but didn’t. I wonder why; lazy, or agenda driven? Great communications!!

  22. Keys says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:32 am

    I hope the Horowitz foundation “considers” a lawsuit for libel and/or slander.
    No doubt JW readers would support a special fund, if there is a case here, but there are other considerations, I am sure.

    Perhaps public lying by a judge is not grounds for professional and/or legal discipline.

    Any opinions by JW supporters who are attorneys?

    • rubiconcrest says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35 am

      I would support legal action against a Judge who engages in libel or slander.

    • Karen says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 11:59 am

      Great idea, and I would send a contribution.

    • Karen says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 12:02 pm

      And please include the publication which willfully spread the lie.

  23. Florida Jim says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:37 am

    Deport all muslims at once they cannot be trusted and a Caliphate worldwide is their goal. do not allow any to stay and deport all illegal with them Mexico and Central America deserve them we don’t.
    Anyone who wants a Caliphate,Sharia,Jihad, Dhimmitude, Taqiyya, and beheading must leave at once.
    They have many wives to reproduce 6 times faster than us so it doesn’t take long to overrun the ballot box and end freedom everywhere.

  24. Mirren10 says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:56 am

    ”You go to such extremes in your arguments. Nobody, least not me, is suggesting Marxism. ”

    The ‘redistribution of wealth’ is doctrinaire Marxism.

    I suggest you read Les’s comment.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 22, 2016 at 10:45 pm

      Absolutely, Mirren.

  25. Jay Boo says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:57 am

    No one with a Metro-Sexual Spike -Wave Hair-do and a devilish ‘Look at me’ pencil thin goatee should ever be trusted as a judge.

    He looks like a cross between Edward Cullen of Twilight and Lucifer.

  26. Keys says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:00 am

    Article from Feb., 2015 on the judge.

    http://www.latimes.com/local/great-reads/la-ca-c1-first-muslim-judge-20150202-story.html

  27. David says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:29 am

    “If we are practicing muslims, we are above the law of the land.”
    -Mustafa Carroll, Director, CAIR Texas, USA.

  28. David says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:52 am

    Muslim brotherhood/Satanic Brotherhood/Demonic Brotherhood! It’s all one organization as far as I’ve been able to tell!
    They are all lying, subversive, seditious hate groups. When will the government finally begin to (as we did in WW2) de-NAZI-fy our country? Yes! I see all these muslum HATE GROUPS as little different from the NAZIS of the 1940’s.

  29. Robert_K says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:54 am

    But it is true that California has been renamed Khlaifornia by some of the Muslim persuasion.

  30. Robert_K says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:55 am

    But it is true that California has been renamed Khalifornia by some of the Muslim persuasion.

    Reply

  31. ninetyninepct says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 12:14 pm

    It is impossible for any Muslim to be a Judge or lawyer in a Democracy. They are violating the commands of Islam and must be removed by their own Islamic members. In support of their so called “religious” beliefs, democratic humans should do the removing for them.

  32. somehistory says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Eyes that look out of a soul given over to the devil’s beast, a heart fabricating lies and a mouth that spews them to cause the uninformed to falter and fall victim.

    islam is evil because it comes from the most evil creature of all time…satan the devil. The destiny awaiting the devil, awaits islam. There will be no escape.

    • Champ says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 11:26 pm

      All very true, Somehistory.

  33. Joe says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 1:02 pm

    What I cannot understand is how those who identify as Muslim can ever be elected to office in the USA, and in no way should they be governors or judges. The religion of Islam to which they adhere institutes supremacy of Muslims over all else, and puts all man made laws under the law of Allah (which devout Muslims are seeking to implement throughout the land). If they deny this then they should not call themselves Muslims or they should not be trusted in the first place.

  34. Bezelel says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    If people only hear the lies, they have nothing to base the truth on. Controlling the narrative is job 1 for the liars that have slipped in and the enemedia is covering for them. I think the so-called judge needs to be held accountable for lying. He is not fit to be judge in this country. Standards need to be upheld. Another example of where waterboarding could get the truth out of corrupt government liar.

  35. Lioness says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    Crumbling of a nation’s justice system starts with the appointment of muslim judges.

  36. DJM says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 5:16 pm

    The judges Wikipedia page says the same thing, citing this same article as the source.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halim_Dhanidina

  37. Joe says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 5:26 pm

    We can see it everywhere and every day that a Muslim ban would be the greatest action on Earth since inventing the wheel!

  38. linnte says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 6:31 pm

    When I was a 14 year old hippie kid, the Constitution and our rights were a major point and every hippie that I knew held those rights dear. Now? The Liberal “hippie type” want to abolish some of our rights. Yes, the world has done a flip flop.

  39. JIMJFOX says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 6:38 pm

    ON TOPIC!
    FFS, try to focus on Robert Spencer’s work- which is JIHAD WATCH, not who’s the most corrupt.
    Extreme corruption permeates all western democracies; neither Left, Right nor ‘Moderate middle’
    is innocent of it. So less of that irrelevance, please!

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 10:25 pm

      Agreed.

    • UNCLE VLADDI says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 11:27 pm

      Re:”Extreme corruption permeates all western democracies; neither Left, Right nor ‘Moderate middle’ is innocent of it. So less of that irrelevance, please!”

      NONSENSE. Utter nonsense!

      Corruption or the intellect and morality is the most intrinsic part of being a leftist (slanderous gangster extortionist).

      The proglodyte’s favorite buzzword, “DIVERSITY” = How to make total opposites seem like equals, in order to support criminals against their victims, and achieve what all criminals really want: equality of outcome over equality of opportunity!

      Liberals pretend to promote “diversity” but their real aim is only to DIVIDE and conquer.

      What better tool to use to divide people than the idol of “diversity?”

      In stead of saying “normal is healthy and good for you!” they whine that “you’re all being
      forced to be normal and healthy by evil normal healthy people, you poor oppressed victims!”

      Victimologists claim that “Being right denies you the right to be wrong in infinitely diverse ways!”

      There is only one way to be right, and an almost infinite number of symptoms of being wrong – ways to be sorta mostly but not really right – and liberal dividers will try to ‘champion’ each and every one of them!

      When people join crime-gangs, they want group rights without group responsibilities.

      They actively conspire among them selves to commit crimes and share in the spoils equally.

      They may not be assigned equally risky tasks, but even so the getaway drivers and lookouts are
      equally culpable, having demonstrated their free-will chosen intent to see the conspiracy through.

      Liberals, who see them selves as criminals, like to defend gangsters’ “rights” to join their gangs
      and to have the right to represent the inherent threat the gang presents without having the general responsibility of being a gang-member, beyond any specific crimes said members personally commit.

      Like all criminals, libertine “liberals” instinctively want gang-might-rights without responsibility.

      They like to lie and pretend there was no cause-and-effect choice to join the gang; it just happened and they had no choice in the matter at all being of course helpless victims of random circumstances.

  40. linnte says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 8:02 pm

    Sorry for the language but THOSE bastards!

  41. Eric Jones says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 8:14 pm

    How can Judge Dhianni be removed from the bench?

    • Bezelel says

      Aug 21, 2016 at 9:43 pm

      Start a rumor that the judge is a gay Trump supporter.

      • LR says

        Aug 22, 2016 at 1:57 pm

        Hahaha…

  42. Bill McKenzie says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 9:07 pm

    Articles like the one referenced, when the Islamofauxbia quidnuncs have to resort to manufacturing bald faced lies to try to make their point, shows just how desperate they are.

  43. mortimer says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 9:28 pm

    Judge Dhanidina said: “I don’t think that any juror or attorney in my courtroom sees me as a Muslim judge”

    Sure…sure, judge, whatever you choose to believe. This is wishful thinking. The judge’s last name contains the word ‘DEEN’ which is Arabic means ‘law’, i.e. the law or religion of Allah. Does the judge think his jihad beard and Islamic name don’t say loudly enough that he believes in his heart that Sharia law is above US law?

  44. gravenimage says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 10:01 pm

    UCLA and California Muslim judge lie about Jihad Watch
    ……………………

    More calumny against those concerned about Jihad. Disgusting.

    Here’s a puff piece about this creep from the LA Times:

    “Faith Informs Work of State’s First Muslim Judge”

    http://www.latimes.com/local/great-reads/la-ca-c1-first-muslim-judge-20150202-story.html

    They mention his being a Cubs fan–but not that he has disturbing links to the Muslim Brotherhood.

  45. UNCLE VLADDI says

    Aug 21, 2016 at 11:23 pm

    What’s the difference from a lying “muslim” judge who libels someone in public, and any other kind of crime-gang member appointed as a “judge” (say, a “Mafiosi” judge)?

    NOTHING, OF COURSE! THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL!

    The governor should be arrested indicted tried and convicted for conspiring to appoint a crime-gang member to judge over the citizens of California.

    UCLA should be sued and forced to retract it’s own lies and for conspiring to propagate the lies of the crime-gang member who was misappointed as a judge.

  46. linnte says

    Aug 22, 2016 at 1:13 am

    Poor Sham. He worships the “greatest of deceivers”. Allah is the greatest of deceivers! What does deceive mean Sham? Look it up in a dictionary and get back to us. Your Qur’an tells us Allah is the greatest of deceivers many many times.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 22, 2016 at 10:57 pm

      Very true, Linnte.

    • Keys says

      Aug 23, 2016 at 2:56 pm

      Right, linnte. Sham needs to look up deceive and think about it.

      Does it not occur to Muslims that the proud “greatest of deceivers” is deceiving them?
      Why would he not deceive them ? He can promise paradise, give it; but change his mind later, and take it away, because he is not all good. He is not love.

      For many Christians God can neither deceive, nor be deceived – because he is all good, and will not be untruthful. Muslims consider it a weakness that God can not deceive, because then they think he is then not all-powerful – that there is something he can not do. But goodness, truth, and love are of his essence. Those things are by Allah’s own words not of his essence.

      Think about that, sham. You can have no peace, because you do not know if Allah is lying. Even if he is not lying now, he could change his mind later on any of his “promises”. There are so many ways that Islam is not peaceful – maybe every way.

      For a Christian Jesus says “my peace I give you, my peace I leave with you” without any need to wonder if he is lying, or will change his mind later.

      Islam – no peace, ever ! Forever !

  47. Joe says

    Aug 23, 2016 at 1:10 pm

    7Delta, thank you for putting DefenderofIslm straight. Obviously English is not his first language, but Islam must be his first religion. Even if he was fluent in English, I don’t think he could defend Islam any more than he could defend this Muslim judge. I have no time to fact check what you have said in response to defender but what you said sounds closer to the truth than what he said. I hope he will honestly look how he has been deceived by Islam and by whoever it is that is giving him his information on the judges he mentioned. Dishonesty on the part of any judge, whether he or she be Muslim-American or Mexican-American should be called out and the judge should be removed from the bench.

  48. Kunal says

    Sep 27, 2016 at 12:53 pm

    A muslim judge?? God bless America!

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.