• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Virginia: Muslima claims she was fired for wearing hijab, Hamas-linked CAIR jumps on the case

Aug 13, 2016 11:42 am By Robert Spencer

“She didn’t wear the hijab at her interview or on the first two days of employment. On her third day, she chose to wear it because she felt that she would stay at the job and wearing it was part of her spiritual journey.”

Why the bait and switch? Her spiritual journey had advanced so markedly on the third day of her employment that she suddenly decided right then that she had to wear the hijab? Or did she intentionally mislead Dr. Joo so as to lay the groundwork for this incident?

The dentist’s version of events differs markedly from that of Najaf Khan. Dr. Joo says he asked her to keep a hijab in the office and wear that one, rather than continuing to wear the one she came in off the street wearing — for hygienic reasons, not because of “Islamophobia.” According to Dori Joyner at Creeping Sharia:

In an NBC Washington taped interview, Ms. Khan describes her version of the events that followed.

“I was devastated. The owner told me to take my hijab off and he gave me an ultimatum. I could continue to wear my headscarf and no longer work there. Or I could continue to work there without my headscarf. And when I said I would not compromise my religion for that, he held the door for me and I walked out.”

However, Dr. Chuck Joo, the dentist and office owner, states on the business website and Facebook page:

“Our office does not have any objections to hijabs. We only asked Ms. Khan to wear a separate, clean hijab (for office wear only) or wear a sanitary head cover over her hijab while seeing patients in the office, just like we require all employees to wear full scrubs and not street clothes in the office when treating patients. This dress code has applied to all dental assistants since 2003, when it was first implemented.

Ms. Khan did not find the dress code or the alternative we offered suitable and she then walked out on her own accord.

Ms. Khan was never terminated from our employ. In fact, we contacted her later in the evening on the same day she voluntarily walked out of the office and offered to continue her paid training program.

We had been inspired by Ms. Khan’s enthusiasm to become a dentist, and even though she had no experience working in dentistry, we provided her with a three month paid training opportunity in exchange for eventual full-time employment, something rare in the dental business. Ms. Khan elected not to respond.”

This is clearly yet another case of manufactured “Islamophobia,” designed to reinforce the idea that Muslims are victims, deflect attention away from jihad terror, and to compel non-Muslims to change their practices in order to accommodate Muslim sensibilities, thus reinforcing the principle that wherever Islamic practices conflict with non-Muslim ones, it is non-Muslim practices that must give way. Pamela Geller has a useful compendium of other examples of this phenomenon here.

NajafKhan

“Virginia Woman Says She Was Fired for Wearing Hijab,” by Shomari Stone, NBC Washington, August 4, 2016:

A Northern Virginia woman says she was fired from a new job because she wore a Muslim head scarf to work.

“I was really upset. The day that it happened, I was devastated,” Najaf Khan told News4.

Khan said she was hired as a dental assistant last week at Fair Oaks Dental Care in Fairfax County.

She didn’t wear the hijab at her interview or on the first two days of employment.

On her third day, she chose to wear it because she felt that she would stay at the job and wearing it was part of her spiritual journey.

At work that day, she said the owner of Fair Oaks Dental Care, Dr. Chuck Joo, told her to take off the hijab.

Khan said Joo gave her an ultimatum: she could continue wearing the scarf and be fired or work without it.

“When I said that I would not compromise my religion for that, he held the door open for me and I walked out,” Khan said.

Joo told News4 open displays of religion are not allowed at his business because he wants to keep it neutral.

If his employees want to wear a hat, it must be a surgical hat for sanitary reasons, Joo said.

The Council on American Islamic Relations responded to Khan’s termination in the following statement:

“No employee should face termination because of his or her faith or religious practices. We call on Fair Oaks Dental Care to reinstate the Muslim employee and to offer her reasonable religious accommodation as mandated by law.”

Khan said she would likely refuse an offer to return to the dental office because she would not want to work with someone “so close-minded.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", CAIR, claiming victim status, Featured, Islamic supremacism Tagged With: Najaf Khan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jay Boo says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 11:46 am

    Obama said he supports the right to wear a hijab.

    This Muslim woman would in contrast be (fired upon) in the Middle East for walking about without her hijab.

    • Deborah D Hanna says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 9:58 am

      If her so-called religion calls for her to wear her hijab, then why didn’t she wear it to the interviews, and why did she wait three days before putting it on. The owner did not forbid her to wear it, he just asked her to keep a clean one in the office to wear. These people are not sanitary and it is not safe for the patients.

  2. Jay Boo says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 11:51 am

    Muslims are hateful and spiteful and love extortion.
    No more Muslim immigration.
    By now, we must know “what is going on”.

    • Peter Ahlskog says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 10:36 am

      Study the example Marseilles, now a Muslim zone and the base for distributing narcotics to what’s left of white France, and you can see that people in West just take more and more and more without understanding what’s going on.

      • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

        Aug 14, 2016 at 5:11 pm

        Oh, we have ‘studied the example’ Peter. Which is why Donald Trump came ‘out of nowhere’, and is drawing crowds of thousands upon thousands every single time he opens his mouth…

        We-The-People aren’t going the way of Europe. TRUMP 2016!

  3. Berengaria says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 11:57 am

    The KHAN JOBS just keep on happening, this KHAN JOB ARTIST,will be in your city next. Everyone in Florida is deathly
    Fear of the KHAN TRIBE, they & CAIR( Unindicted Conspirators to
    Terrorism) run a KHAN JOB ON MOST BUSINESSES. You dare
    Hire them, they will extort money from you, it is the right of Khan Muslims to steal from Christians & Jewish People, allah said so.

    • faraway says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 3:53 pm

      Is this what Obama meant when he came up with the slogan “yes we khan”?

      • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

        Aug 14, 2016 at 5:12 pm

        Oh Faraway, Beren: Excellente! Just stellar!

        We HAVE to keep our humor in the midst of this abomination of desolation. We do. Because otherwise we can’t stay the course.

  4. Johan Elzinga says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:00 pm

    At least this once I’m able to contribute something that the Netherlands DID right in this perspective. When you’re the driver of an public electric street car (I donno the English word for that, we call them a tram) you’re explicitly forbidden to wear ANY religious symbol, and you may well be fired when you persist. Same law for anybody.

  5. PRCS says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:01 pm

    It’s not likely that she just saw the name JOO and thought he was an evil JEW.

    As soon as I saw this last week, I checked the CAIR site. Sure enough, they were “on it”. As it happened on Monday, after having only worked on Thursday and Friday of the previous week, it’s hard to imagine that Uncle Nihad, Honest Ibe, and Coniving Corey didn’t personally concoct this little charade in the first place.

  6. Adrian says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:01 pm

    What gall to try to lay guilt on a society that actually provides all the freedoms that are trampled on by the primitive patriarchal cult her hijab symbolizes?

    • Carolyne says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 10:43 am

      Yeah, but we couldn’t have the male patients go into a sexual frenzy if they saw this woman’s hair. It would interfere with his treatment. IMO, this woman’s bushy eyebrows alone must carry many bacteria, etc. I think requiring that she wear a bag over her head would be more appropriate, but’s that’s just me

  7. Angemon says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:10 pm

    NBC is doing – and I’m going to be charitable here – sloppy reporting. Why wasn’t Dr. Joo’s statement included in the report?

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 12:33 pm

      He did not want to appear on camera (for obvious reasons) knowing the MSM.
      The reporter appears to paraphrase rather than quote directly.

      Here is a video link or video if it plays at site.

      • PRCS says

        Aug 13, 2016 at 3:06 pm

        IMO, this could be the watershed case which proves, once and for all, that hijab is not required by either Qur’an or ahadith.

  8. IQ al Rassooli says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:15 pm

    Dear Americans

    I CHALLENGE any Muslim and especially CAIR to the sum of “200,000 too find the word HIJAB anywhere in Muhammad’s Quran describing the COVERING of a Muslim woman in any way shape or form

    Since no one can take up my challenge because it is the FACT, I advise to Dr Joo NEVER to succumb to these repeated Islamic acts of SUBTERFUGE and on the contrary take this miserable mendacious female and her surrogates at CAIR to court for DEFAMATION of his business, for FALSE accusations and for deliberately LYING about her religious beliefs to the media and the American people

    IQ al Rassooli
    Kafir & Proud!

    • Sog says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 7:00 pm

      It is, however, in the Koran that some women not Married be naked from the waist up, which may have an impact on Dr. Joo’s dental practice. I’m not sure which way; I’d have to see this particular woman in such a state to make the determination.

  9. Jay Boo says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 12:27 pm

    The Dentist’s last name is Joo
    How is that pronounced Ms. Khan?

  10. Patrick A Ludwick says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    Stone the bitch!

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 1:39 pm

      That would be barbaric.
      Behead her in the name of Islam instead and the MSM will puzzle over your motives and swiftly come to your defense.

  11. Karen says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    Ms. Khan is incredibly tiresome.

  12. davej says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    Devious little whiners, the lot of them.

    • Ginger says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 5:35 pm

      9/10 for sad face.

      • Mockingjay says

        Aug 13, 2016 at 7:41 pm

        …!!!

        Good one, Ginger!

  13. somehistory says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 1:51 pm

    She isn’t the first, likely not the last…unless the *end* comes today.

    Owners of businesses should begin to video tape any and all conversations with moslims who are hired…they don’t ever seem to actually *work*..and then pull something like the women all do..the scarf trick.

    If they come in wearing it, and there are rules about head coverings, tape the interview, whether or not the moslim is hired.
    If they do like she…and so many others…did, tape the conversation about the rules governing the job requirements. Don’t let them have a *story* to tell that can be repeated again and again.

    It’s time to end the tricks. They know there are laws that prevent owners of businesses from not hiring due to religion. But there are also steps the owners can take to protect themselves.

    If there is a trial, hopefully the jury will see through the tricks and lies and award the dentist damages and make her pay court costs.

  14. Georg says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 1:59 pm

    She was hired without it. Fired with it. Maybe the universe it trying to tell her something.

  15. B B says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 2:30 pm

    My first thought before I even got to the end of this article was a set-up for a lawsuit to fulfill some expectation of entitlement to money – right about the spot where she wanted to be a dentist and was offered a 3 month training program with the possibility of being hired. This ‘method’ of setting up situations for lawsuits seems to be fairly prevalent in this time of ours. Maybe due to not wanting to be on the govt dole, but to get a wad of money to do ‘something’ with, whether live on or donate to some cause? Very interesting for sure.

  16. Lynne says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 2:33 pm

    This is similar to a story about a teacher who got the job and then showed up several days later in a niqab. She scared the kids. Somewhere in Europe, I believe. Anyone remember?

  17. Transmaster says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 3:08 pm

    This amazing in Saudi Arabia female health care workings in clinical settings are required to wear scrubs with matching hajibs. This sweetie pie picked the wrong place to do her personal jihad. This clinic has a standard clinical dress code and has since 2003. This is going to get tossed with prejudice by the Judge.

  18. jayell says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    A couple of things:-

    1. “I was really upset. The day that it happened, I was devastated,” Najaf Khan told News4……”

    Muslims regularly think the most artrocious things about others and do the most artrocious things to others, yet when they’re on the wrong end of something even as mundane as this, all of a sudden they’re ‘upset’ and ‘devastated’! The eternal victims.

    2. “Khan said she would likely refuse an offer to return to the dental office because she would not want to work with someone “so close-minded.”….”

    And this coming from a muslim, whose ‘faith’ demands that they be arrogantly prescriptive and ‘close-minded’ to the extent of downright bigotry, hence her utter failure to appreciate or accommodate Mr. Joo’s reasonable requests based on the demands of hygiene.

    UK readers may be familiar with the appalling ‘Noah’ case, similar to this one, where a young female muslim went for a job at a ladies’ hairdresser’s salon wearing the cusomary headscarf. The owner of the salon asked her if she would remove the headscarf, because she (the owner) thought that it was important that the clients see the hairdresser’s own hair as a kind of testimonial to the hairdresser’s own commitment to their art. This apparently had always been a major priority of this particular owner. When Mrs. Noah, the young muslim concerned, refused, the owner declined to give her the job. Now, everyone guess what happened.next. Yes, you’re right, after much bleating and whinging from the no doubt ‘devasted’ (sic) Mrs. Noah, it went to court, costing the salon owner quite a bit of money before the action even started. The court eventually found in favour of the salon owner but awarded Mrs. Noah (I believe)£4,000 (yes, that’s four thousand pounds, about $6,000) because of her ‘hurt feelings’……even though she lost the case!!! This payout apparently was likely to put the salon out of business, because the owner simply didn’t have that kind of cash spare. I’m not sure what happened in the end; perhaps some UK reader reading this knows, and can correct me if any facts are wrong. It seems to prove that (a) muslims are right even if they’re wrong and (b) all the nauseating whinging and bleating pays off.

    • Martin says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 10:57 pm

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7457794.stm

  19. marina says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 3:43 pm

    Another niqab incident if anyone is interested

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/family-dollar-niqab-video_us_57a335a9e4b0e1aac914d939

  20. Bruce says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 3:51 pm

    It seems the more you cater to these pilgrims the more they advance . I have a solution to the problem one that always works to our benefit. Just go see the ”Duke ” . He will fix the problem for sure.

  21. DHazard says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 4:12 pm

    Everything you need to know about moderate Muslims here.

    1. Feel that the world is victimizing you.
    2. See intolerance of Muslims EVERYWHERE and in EVERY interaction with non-Muslims.
    3. Hold absolutely NO gratitude for anything, country or person who helps you, unless they’re Muslim.
    4. Have no qualms about setting people up to confirm your biases (i.e. bigotry) about non-Muslims
    5. Lie freely and without shame when it serves your purpose.
    6. Limited knowledge of their own religion (hijab not mentioned in the Quran).
    7. Blame other people for your self created problems.
    8. Extort, cheat, distort, exaggerate, misrepresent, etc. whenever you feel that doing so will work for you financially in court.

    • jayell says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 1:56 am

      Superb summary of the ‘islamic experience’ as enjoyed (sic) by those of us whom the Followers of the Prophet have deigned to grace with their (unwanted) presence. Seems to be a combination of the fanciful projection of their islamic mindset onto those around them (e.g., the victimisation and intolerance bits) with the staightforward operation of islam with all its beautiful benevolent sincerity and honesty. (OK, that last bit is just a touch sarcastic).

  22. Goddess says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 4:31 pm

    Deport this bitch and pull her funds to pay for it.

  23. Champ says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    She *deceived* her employer by not disclosing the fact that she wore a hijab in the first place. And I don’t feel sorry for her at all. I only feel sympathy for those she chose to deceive.

    • Richard says

      Aug 13, 2016 at 9:37 pm

      She made it clear that she isn’t required to wear the slave rag by interviewing and showing up to the first days of work without it. And the day someone in my dentist’s office wants to reach in my mouth wearing a hijab is the day I find a new dentist!

    • Carolyne says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 11:13 am

      Isn’t it strange that the sight of throwing people off buildings or beheading someone would devastate me, but Muslims don’t bat an eye to it? While not being able to wear a contaminated head covering in a dentist’s office, where things should be as sterile as possible devastates them? They have a low threshold of devastation when it comes to civilized behavior.

  24. Dinosaur Teeth says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 4:47 pm

    “We call on Fair Oaks Dental Care to reinstate the Muslim employee and to offer her reasonable religious accommodation as mandated by law.”

    Yeah, Sharia Law…

    • Isabellathecrusader says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 1:40 am

      We call on CAIR to take a long walk off a short pier.

      • Carolyne says

        Aug 14, 2016 at 11:14 am

        I call on CAIR to blow itself up with one of their compatriots’ suicide bombs.

  25. the dutch patriot says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 7:32 pm

    Let us all take Cair and do to Cair what needs to be done…

  26. Richard says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 9:35 pm

    “Joo told News4 open displays of religion are not allowed at his business because he wants to keep it neutral.”

    This statement sort of contradicts the statement attributed to the dentist that he offered that Khan could keep a clean hijab in the office with which to see patients. The waters are a bit muddy, but it is clear that this is another case of Muslim bait-and-switch with the purpose of Islamification of the workplace.

  27. abad says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 10:29 pm

    Just another attention whoring Muslima.

    Nothing new to see here.

  28. Cy Halothrin says

    Aug 13, 2016 at 11:10 pm

    Najaf Khan is also upset that Dr Joo would not allow her to wear a suicide vest at work.

    “A suicide vest is an important expression of my religion,” Ms Khan explained. “I was devastated when I was told I couldn’t wear it to work. What a racist country this is!”

    A spokesperson for CAIR said that Muslims have a constitutional right to wear suicide vests, especially when employed at or visiting kaffir businesses.

    • Carolyne says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 11:17 am

      Yes, Cy. Isn’t that one of Obama’s Executive Orders?

  29. gravenimage says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 1:30 am

    Virginia: Muslima claims she was fired for wearing hijab, Hamas-linked CAIR jumps on the case
    …………………..

    More fake victim-mongering. Now expect “Lawfare” against this poor dentist.

  30. Jay Cee says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 3:17 am

    Check this PDF CAIR Guide to hiring muzzies.
    http://src.bna.com/etm

  31. bostongal912 says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 3:19 am

    As soon as these Muslims get CAIR involved you know it’s all about the money! Why didn’t she wear her head scarf the first three days of her employment? Sounds funny to me! Like she had the whole thing planned! I think her story is a bunch of crap and hope she doesn’t get one dime from this!

  32. nicu says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 3:49 am

    and again the whine and play the victim card : We don’t want you and your hijab and Burka in our countries !!!

  33. Iftikhar Ahmad says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 7:56 am

    How can a headband and long skirt be described as ‘too religious’? Ridiculous. I see nothing wrong with wearing a headscarf, and find the French outlawing of them unfair and unnecessary. But there are other religions and sects that insist on a certain dress code for their followers, most orders of Christian nuns for example, are also covered from head to toe. Girl dressing modestly is seen as a religious symbol, yet girls in short skirts hitched up revealing their knickers is perfectly acceptable and not an insult to Christianity and therefore also a religious issue? It’s funny how democracy is linked to freedom when it seems to be taking people’s freedom away, the freedom to choose.You shouldn’t be able to order a woman to go around wrapped up from head to toe, but you shouldn’t be able to order her to go around half naked either. What is wrong with a girl wearing a long skirt.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

    • IQ al Rassooli says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 10:14 am

      Iftikhar Ahmad

      As I made a challenge earlier, I shall now challenge YOU to find a SINGLE verse in Muhammad’s Quran containing the word HIJAB denoting the covering of a woman in any way shape or form!

      Since there is NO such verse, then You and Khan are again attempting to DECEIVE people who do not know the Quran by claiming a FALSEHOOD

      Furthermore, assuming there is such a mythical verse, as a Muslim you and Ms Khan according to your ‘religion’ are SHARIA compliant hence you are both ENEMIES of every human being on Earth who are NOT Muslims (currently 80% of humanity)

      She deliberately with Malice Aforethought DECEIVED her prospective employer by appearing twice without Hijab so as to claim VICTIM HOOD

      Will you please try your WORST to disprove me?

      IQ al Rassooli
      Kafir & Proud!

    • JSteering says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 1:57 pm

      Because, as my post below suggests, any religious element in the dress of Muslim women is secondary to the male domination one. An excerpt… “The head and body covering of Muslim women has very little to do with religion but a great deal to do with male domination, the subjugation of women and sexual repression. A shocking documentary on Britain’s Channel 4, “The Men With Many Wives” – polygamous marriage in Britain – had this quote from one of the men it followed who insists on his wives covering their faces with the traditional veil: ‘My wives are something to be covered and protected for me,’ he says. ‘Some people put sheets over their cars, they cover their valuables and keep them away from people seeing and desiring the things that they have.’ “

  34. Hessie L Harris says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 8:04 am

    This was a set up and the employers fell for it.

  35. Mary Jane Moffett says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 8:18 am

    Every business should officially ban any headgear except what is specifically a part of their required uniform. That should eliminate all controversies.

  36. Pigs be upon Him says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 9:39 am

    stupid to hire a muslim in the first place…

    this is typical muslim get rich extortion scheme and CAIR lawyers are getting rich

    We cannot have separate and equal rules in our society, that was called segregation. It’s not allowed..

    Muslims want apartheid, want to be treated higher and better and special, NOPE !

  37. paul says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 10:20 am

    A dentist has money, and finding a white one amongst all the muslim ones is still possible. She should be working over the Christian businesses. Jewish businesses make great targets too. They are extremely white, rich, and therefore racist, and great rewards are available when you sue them for trampling on your religious rights. This is the only group you can discriminate against and get city help.. The city liberals on council will even help you grind them down, extract hundreds of thousands of dollars, as liberals they hate Christianity too. Its all a great jihad!

    Easier than marrying your brother, getting elected, and screaming racism like the one in Minnesota did.

  38. JSteering says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 10:48 am

    The head and body covering of Muslim women has very little to do with religion but a great deal to do with male domination, the subjugation of women and sexual repression. A shocking documentary on Britain’s Channel 4, “The Men With Many Wives” – polygamous marriage in Britain – had this quote from one of the men it followed who insists on his wives covering their faces with the traditional veil: ‘My wives are something to be covered and protected for me,’ he says. ‘Some people put sheets over their cars, they cover their valuables and keep them away from people seeing and desiring the things that they have.’

    Read about him and the others here… http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2762988/Strolling-park-London-businessman-THREE-wives-just-one-20-000-multi-wife-marriages-POLYGAMY-BRITAIN.html

    A clue to Britain’s future lies right here in the programme – Mohammed el Ghannay from Sheffield whose whole family relies on state benefits says: “We’ve got three wives, one husband, 11 children: we are a family.” Yet his third wife, 26 years old and caring for three of his children hundreds of miles away in Morocco, is left alone for nine months of the year…. Shaheen Qureshi is a mother of eight also on state benefits.

  39. Sam says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 11:27 am

    If we had common sense as a nation, we would penalize people wearing hijab as it represents agreement with an ideology against freedom and lower class status of women and killing homosexuals.

    But no, we have to reward

    • Sam says

      Aug 14, 2016 at 11:29 am

      But no, we have to reward Islam I meant.

  40. David Thompson says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 3:43 pm

    I think the lesson to be learned here is dont hire a muslim. Find out before hiring. Obviously their name
    and country of ethnicity are clues.

  41. firefox says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 6:03 pm

    I will never trust a muslim again.
    I would never hire a muslim.
    They have no intention of assimilating – its a religious dictate not to mix with the kafir.
    You never know which one will decide that today, you are the unbeliever that dies – that too is a religious dictate.
    So, why the hell do we keep bringing them in.
    Oh yeah, guaranteed to vote liberal.
    I will never trust a liberal again.

  42. citycat says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 7:43 pm

    “so closed minded”?
    What? Like the infidel girl who does not want to be raped by the low life Muslim?
    Maybe she went there not for the job but for further propagation of Islam.
    She’s done her little bit for Islam, got a touch of fame, why waste time working now that the main purpose has been spread a little more,
    like the cancer that Islam is.

  43. Troybeam says

    Aug 14, 2016 at 8:55 pm

    Easy to fix in the business world: NEVER HIRE A MUSLIM you’ll avoid issues such as these, save your sanity and keep your money free of legal fees.

    • Aardvark says

      Aug 15, 2016 at 8:00 am

      Exactly, Troybeam!

      Rules for hiring staff.
      (I followed these for a number of years in the IT industry, and had no problems. They will be just as relevant in any other industry).

      1. Always get written CVs from applicants. Immediately discard any with mohammedan names.

      2. Always ask for references, and always check them. Any with fictitious references should be discarded.

      3. Always interview several applicants (at least five or six), so you have a reasonable choice.

      4. The interview should include:

      a) A face-to-face discussion. Have a list of questions ready, so all applicants are asked the same ones. (Mohammedans can sometimes be spotted at this stage.)

      b) If possible, a skills test. (This is easy in IT – sit them in front of a PC with the appropriate software, and give them a specification for an easy program to write in a hour. It’s amazing how many people who describe themselves as ‘computer programmers’ have no idea how to even start!).

      5. Don’t make any decision until all applicants have been interviewed, and make it known that this is your policy.

      6. When you have made a choice, make sure all applicants are informed of your decision in their case – there are examples of polite refusal letters online if you need one: e.g. http://alturl.com/2t3wb

      Follow these rules and you should be able to avoid unsuitable employees (especially mohammedans!) without breaking any laws.

  44. Frank E says

    Oct 10, 2016 at 11:19 pm

    Whats next when cair finds out that i haven’t been beating up my wife enough or plotting and planning a jihad mission.?
    Wasting company time by having to constantly pray.
    To old to join a rape gang but stealing and welfare fraud and pick pocketing are still possible.Of course if my daughter doesn’t want to marry her half wit first cousin I might have to throw acid in her face right after the genital mutilation with the rusty blade.

  45. Don't be "khanned" (i.e. conned) says

    Oct 23, 2016 at 12:54 am

    So any potential employer can find the truth on Najaf Khan and see the truth (her lies and extortionist tactics), Najaf Khan is a student at George Mason University. She is not even a dental student, she is in Cognitive Psychology, Behavioural Science area of George Mason University (GMU). Najaf Khan is also involved with the Alpha Epsilon Delta premed honor society. Don’t be “khanned” (i.e. conned) by her.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Lion heart on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Graham Bryant on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.