This is how far gone Canada has become, in absorbing Muslim refugees and using a stealth jihadist group to help “integrate” them. The same democratic country that supposedly has rescued refugees from jihadist abuse is now ironically providing fertile ground for “radicalization,” beginning with a victimology mindset that teaches them that Western infidels hate Muslims.
The Canadian Red Cross has funded a teachers’ guide depicting Canadian society as practicing a “terrorist ideology of hate” against Muslims.
To produce the booklet, the Red Cross gave $3,000 from its “Syrian refugee resettlement fund” to the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), formerly CAIR-Canada. The group changed its name three years ago after its parent organization, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), was repeatedly shown to have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
Canada has accepted 31,000 Syrian refugees in the past year, but the guide shows less concern for refugee children than for “Canadian Muslim youth.” The word “refugees” does not even appear in the title, “A Guide for Educators: Helping Students Deal with Trauma Related to Geopolitical Violence & Islamophobia.”
The partnership of the Canadian Red Cross (and the Canadian Human Rights Commission) with the National Council of Canadian Muslims is facilitating the Muslim Brotherhood plan to “sabotage” Canada’s “miserable house” from within.”
“Canadian Red Cross Outsources Guide for Refugees to CAIR”, by John Goddard, Clarion Project, September 28, 2016:
The Canadian Red Cross has funded a teachers’ guide depicting Canadian society as practicing a “terrorist ideology of hate” against Muslims.
The guide, written ostensibly to coach teachers on how to help Syrian refugee children adapt, suggests that “hate,” “discrimination” and “Islamophobia” amount to a terrorist ideology, and that non-Muslim Canadians are its perpetrators. The solution is Islam, the guide says.
“The core values and central tenants of Islam are immutable,” it says, “and are the best counter-narrative to the terrorist ideology of hate.”
The Red Cross is expressing vague misgivings about the publication.
“The original intention… was to provide educators with a resource to help children deal with cultural transition and possible trauma due to war and significant cultural change,” the charity’s spokesperson said in an interview. “In our view, the majority of the publication achieves its intended purpose, but there are specific areas that we don’t feel fit with its original intention.”
To produce the booklet, the Red Cross gave $3,000 from its “Syrian refugee resettlement fund” to the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), formerly CAIR-Canada. The group changed its name three years ago after its parent organization, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), was repeatedly shown to have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
Canada has accepted 31,000 Syrian refugees in the past year, but the guide shows less concern for refugee children than for “Canadian Muslim youth.” The word “refugees” does not even appear in the title, “A Guide for Educators: Helping Students Deal with Trauma Related to Geopolitical Violence & Islamophobia.”
The 16-page booklet portrays Muslim youth as under attack not from Islamic State terrorists or President Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian forces, but from non-Muslim Canadians.
“To constantly feel under attack, to have to defend one’s faith, and to be continuously called upon to condemn the actions of criminals and terrorists is emotionally traumatic,” the booklet says.
The word “trauma” appears often, mostly referring to Muslim life in Canada. “Trauma can be related to historical events such as the history of colonization,” the guide says. And: “Being marginalized and categorized as ‘the other’… can be traumatic.”
The guide includes specific tips for teachers. One is to examine oneself for anti-Muslim bias — “recognize your own judgments and biases.” Another is to let Muslims proselytize in schools — “provide space for Muslim students to speak to their peers about their faith.”
In italics, the tip sheet says: “Care should be taken by teachers on the language and tone they take when discussing world events and the Islamic faith.”…
Two years ago, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police abruptly cut its collaboration with the NCCM on a “United Against Terrorism” guide. The police force “could not support the adversarial tone” of the booklet, they said.
The Red Cross said its specific objections to the teachers’ booklet include three reprinted op-ed pieces. One is by the head of the Winnipeg-based Islamic Social Services Association, a partner on the booklet, comparing the circumstances of Canadian Muslims to that of Japanese-Canadians interned during World War Two.
“We are in discussions with the organization that produced the publication,” the Red Cross spokesperson said. “I’m not sure what the end result will be.”
Another collaborator on the guidebook was the Canadian Human Rights Commission, an ostensibly neutral federal government body, which “translated the booklet into French to reach a broader audience,” a spokesperson said.
Two years ago, the NCCM sued then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his press secretary for libel when the press secretary referred to NCCM as “an organization with documented ties to a terrorist organization such as Hamas.” The case is still before the courts.

Dom107 says
Vote them out at election time.Its all we can do !!
gravenimage says
This is appalling–slamming the very country that is giving these Muslims asylum. And the Red Cross is paying for this–shameful.
Kolga says
Not to forget the contemptuous rejection, by Muslims, of Red Cross care packages at the Macedonian border in 2015, but hey, if we grovel enough, accomodate enough, appease enough, give enough, capitulate enough then
Muslims will come to like us and we can all sit around the campfire, hands linked, singing kumbaya.
Rampant stupidity and denial abounds, even after being spat in the face.
If the powers that be don’t admit that they screwed up royally and face this threat to the West head on with a conviction as rabid as that that enslaves the Muslims the world that my grandchildren, and beyond, will inherit will be a horror story.
DFD says
Hi Folks,
Here’s a bit of something which is, IMO, noteworthy. In fact so noteworthy that I provide the source, and the name of author in addition to a full translation. An Article from the 30 September 2016 published in “Conservo”, a German online mag/blog. The article is from a gentleman by name of Helmut Zott. It will also serve as a further indicator for how long this “whole thing” is going one, and that it has been thoroughly planed – think of 1962-1965, and nothing less than a Vatican Council. The actual link: https://conservo.wordpress.com/2016/09/30/kirche-und-macht/
Here is the translation……………………..
Church & Power
by Helmut Zott
The statement of the second Vatican Councils (1962-1965) that the God of Christendom is identical with Allah, is not only completely wrong, but its effect upon the future of all of Christianity is so devastating, that it can only be compared with the far reaching changes and alterations of Christendom which were implemented {insert: forced upon Christianity} by the Council of Nicae in 325AD.
Then under the auspices of Emperor Constantine, a formal pact was made between Emperor and Church. As a foundation it was established that the Church is entitled to demand from the Emperor the ‘he will draw the sword in order to force obedience to what the Church declares to be the correct faith.” Through this connection of state and church the Empire was not converted to the Church, but the Church to the Empire.
The resultant “two-sword-theory” of the ‘Bulle’ (“Unam sanctam”) was explained by Pope Bonifaz VIII., (1302) as follows: “One sword to be wielded by the Church, and the other for the Church.” The ‘Bulle’ stated further that it is necessary for the “Hail” {in that sense: Salvation) of every human soul to submit itself to (the authority of) the Roman Pope. To that effect Leo X. (1513-1521) had everyone at his feet. He was celebrated and addressed as the ‘highest of all human beings’. The inquisition then became an instrument of Rome’s ‘Holy War’, with which everything that did now want to volunteer into this ‘Christian Roman Realm’, was forced to submit – or face extermination.
One can reach from various passages of the book „Zeitbomben der Weltgeschichte“ (Time Bombs of History) by Marius Baar, that consequently similar relations and structures developed as found in Islam, that is the interconnection of religion and worldly power {insert: the way it is phrased in the original implies that this is still the case at present. Though, much reduced to what it originally was.}
Today’s Church has allied itself with the ‘power factor’ Islam, (a combination) which will affect radical change in the future. (insert: implying that we ain’t seen nothing yet}. That is why a Dr. Hans-Pater Raddatz (insert: you have similar characters in the US and other places} talks about “Chrislam”, which therefore or actually has been brought into existence in the II. Vatican Council in 1965.
What initially was supposed to reduce the gap with Judaism, resulted in a ‘brotherhood’ with those who want to destroy Israel. The equalization of the Christian Gott with Allah has assumed dogmatic character, because the Catholic Church determined simultaneously that any diversion or avoidance of the ‘Bulle’ of the Council would be an act of renegation from the teachings of the Church and therefore from the (Catholic) Church itself. {insert: That is a statement by the Council, and it obviously implies the self excommunication for the renegade concerned !!! …..}
Through this fundamental error the Church becomes the facilitator of the spread of Islam, and through this, with the resultant empowerment of Islam, the Church as well as the Christian Occident will be ruined. Consequently we are (all) not only at a parting road, but at the edge of an abyss.
What one faces with Islam has been described by Moussa Afschar as follows:
“The most important peculiarity of Islam is its insatiable appetite for power. Islam wants to rule to the exclusion of everything else. Its ideal condition is simply world rule. This is not a new ideology, nor is it the aim of the ‘Islamic extremist’, but the explicit order of Allah!” {This then is followed by the usual quotes from the Quran}
From this “Cäsar Papismus“ (“Caesar-Papism”) to “Chrislam” was and is the way of the Catholic Church as far as can be gauged. It will falter and collapse through this connection, or at ‘best’, it will continue to exist in a form within which the true spirit of Christendom has been abandoned.
{This then is followed by a rather sad and depressive poem, not easy to translate.}
……………….. End of translation
Personal comment from DFD: There were and are of course members of the Catholic, and other clergy, who are trying to to oppose this, I believe that’s why Kardinal Ratzinger/Pope Bendikt “resigned”, but what chance do they have against a **Vatican Council ** and the ‘Bulle’ issued by such council? None! Martin Luther anyone?
Angemon says
Good to see some dissent in the ranks.
billybob says
How can Allah be the same god as the Christian God? because Allah hates Christians. This is very clear from the Quran. Yet the Christian God is a god of love, and loves everybody while Allah seem hates everybody, even at times Muslims.
John Stefan says
Martin Luther came to realize from the study of the Bible itself that it is from Scripture alone and not from the dictates of human beings of the church that we learn the truths of God. It is from Scripture alone that we learn Who God is and what He is like and what He has done to redeem all of mankind from sin. He sent the eternal Word into the world to be born of the virgin Mary to take our place under the law and fulfill it perfectly in our place. Jesus is the true God and so also is the Holy Spirit Who creates saving faith in our hearts through the Gospel. . . . .
The Muhammadans reject all of this and, therefore, allah and Islam and the Qur’an and the hadiths and the Sira, all of it is of the devil. And anyone, including the pope himself that equates God the Holy Trinity with the moon-god allah,had better ask God for forgiveness and start preaching what the Bible teaches.
carol says
DFD…I recently watched the fine interview Robert Spencer had with Father Trenham (in honour of 9/11 I believe). It’s on the Jihad Watch Daily Digest emailing of 9/12/16. You and others might like to view the section where the Nostra Aetate was discussed (at approximately 10:45 to 17: 50). Here’s the link:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/09/video-robert-spencer-on-jihad-dhimmitude-islamization-and-the-failure-of-western-leaders
and here’s a link to the Nostra Aetate itself:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
DFD says
Thanks Carol
Claudette says
This is not just for Austrilia its globally and stop saying people are Islamophobia idiots !!! http://youtu.be/YVPngzSE94o
Mark A says
The Canadian Red Cross will never receive another charitable donation from me.
I won’t donate money or support to any organization which supports CAIR.
Mirren10 says
I stopped my donations to the British Red Cross when they refused to have Nativity creches in their charity shops at Christmas, in case they ‘offended muslims’. Faugh.
Glenn says
They are not Syrian and they are not refugees. Have a look at who they are and where they are from!
Africa, Egypt…. under the guise if being Syrian and a refugee. They are mostly made up young males, ready to rape and pillage.
overman says
That 1001 lslamic inventions is pure myth from my understanding, and also according to author Ralph Ellis, who has debunked it at the link below:
Some quotes:
“Islamic Inventions were Roman, Greek and Persian:
http://www.academia.edu/8749355/Islamic_Inventions_were_Roman_Greek_and_Persian
1001Islamic Inventions??
According to conventional wisdom Islam was a civilized and enlightened creed during the Dark Ages, while the Christian world was wallowing in depravity and ignorance. Islam was, therefore, the guardian and savior of all ancient science, knowledge and wisdom. But that is not true in the slightest. Islam took over many highly educated and highly advanced regions of the Byzantine Empire, at the point of the sword, and forced whole populations to convert to Islam. There were many sects in those times, just like the Alawi, Alevi, Ahmadiyya, Sufi, Druze and Ishmailis of the modern era, who adopted a cloak of Islam to avoid persecution and death. Those who refused to change their beliefs were forced to live as dhimmis – they were effectively reduced to serfdom in their own lands. The Jewish, Christian and Sabaean dhimmis of the East did the work and paid the taxes, while their Muslim overlords ran the administration and army, and lived in comparative luxury. This is how dhimmi unbelievers have to live in a Muslim controlled society, as the long-suffering Christians of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey fully understand”
“Nevertheless, despite the well-known vacuous nature of Islamic science, an enterprising exhibition has been touring the museums of the world, promoting the virtues of Islamic inventions. It is called 1,001 Islamic Inventions and has been put together by Abdul Latif Jameel, a Saudi Arabian car importer, and it seeks to extol the remarkable and indispensable contribution that Islamic inventions have made to civilisation and to the betterment of mankind. The tour’s website is keen to note the many endorsements and praise given by the sycophantic Western media, especially the UK’s left-leaning Independent newspaper. Yet these enthusiastic endorsements by
seemingly knowledgeable media outlets will obviously inuence the foolish
and the ignorant, which is why we see the likes of the president of the USA aping these claims as if they were proven fact. Obama said in his 2009 Cairo
speech:
‘As a student of history, I also know civilisation’s debt to Islam … It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra, the magnetic compass and tools of navigation. Our mastery of pens and printing, or understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic architecture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires, timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation’
But Obama is a particularly biased student of history, just as one might expect, and so we and that the reality of Islam is very different”.
overman says
“and so we and that the reality of Islam is very different”
Should be:
‘and so we find that the reality of Islam is very different’
gravenimage says
Thanks for posting this, overman. The Islamic “Golden Age” is one of the biggest canards–second only to Islam being a “religion of peace”.
Nonblvr says
Holy shiiiit. I have been a regular contributor to the Canadian Red Cross for years. It won’t be a cheque they get in their next return envelope.
Ed Lee says
I have never met a member of the United States military who has anything good to say about the Red Cross. My dad was a World War II vet. He despised the Red Cross. My 7th grade teacher was a Korea vet. He also had nothing but enmity for the Red Cross. Many of my high school friends served tours in Vietnam. They think poorly of the Red Cross. I worked for over 10 years in Air Force flight test with Gulf War vets. They have a similar low opinion of the Red Cross. This Canadian fiasco just reinforces their long term despicable behavior.
davej says
The only ones “teaching an ideology of hate” are the devout Muslims.
We do not wish to hate Islam but they force it upon us with the stabbings, street bombings and sexual attacks on our women and children.
Saying that we hate them without reason is untrue and just reinforces the Islamic creed.
Why would the Red Cross spread such lies?
moeped says
Even the Canadian human rights commission endorses this shit.
http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/eng/content/new-guide-support-teachers-creating-inclusive-and-compassionate-classroom-muslim-students.
gravenimage says
“Even”? Actually, the misnamed “Canadian Human Rights Commission” has been persecuting Anti-Jihadists for years, Just look at the ordeal they put Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant a few years ago.
Banislam says
Vote the bastard out. The least you can do is go to petitions.org. and sign the Trudeau no confidence vote. Will never ever give these people a dime.
D-spot says
We’re stuck with him – what did they think they were getting? A part time drama coach with a political father and good hair – has the ability, intellect and gravitas to run a country and debate and win against the Putin’s of the world?
This is no statesman, and the honeymoon will soon be over.
Banislam says
Shootings stabbings and rapes every day now in Canada thanks to Trudeau and now this? Something must be done asap to stop them in their tracks. Pislamic evil is spreading in Canada at lightening speed. Any suggestions other than writing our m.ps?
Lawrence Tierney says
CAIR, CAIR-CAN and The NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CANADIAN MUSLIMS are fronts for the ISLAMIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION “THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD”.
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is an Islamic Terrorist Organization whose goal is the creation of a World Wide Islamic Caliphate and the establishment and enforcement of SHARIA LAW over the world (ISLAMIC WORLD DOMINATION).
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD controls all the Islamic Associations in North America such as the Council on North American-Islamic Relations Canada (CAIR-CAN), The National Council of Canadian MUSLIM(NCCM) and others.
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD owns and controls all of the Mosques and so called Islamic Schools in Canada and the United States, their goal is to promote Extremist Islam. They use these facilities to raise funds for Terrorist Groups such as HAMAS and HIZBULLAH as well as others. It is from the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD that all other Islamic Terrorist Groups have originated. (HIZBULLAH, HAMAS, AL QUDS, AL QAIDE and others).
Please refer to the Mackenzie Institute Article: “The Muslim Brotherhood in Canada: Civilization Jihad” by Tom Quggin.
http://mackenzieinstitute.com/muslim-brotherhood-canada-civilization-jihad-2/
mark says
Redcross in the uk also gives some of its CHARITY funds to red crescent, who has been found to be assisting terrorists etc.
Contacted redcross in the uk and they put me onto a MUSLIMA, working for them.
t. says
“Redcross in the uk also gives some of its CHARITY funds to red crescent”
If that’s true, then we can safely conclude that useful idiocy is all over the map of the west, and probably the world for that matter!
Top to bottom, left to right and all the diagonal directions in between!
mark says
Huuum, under check your bias, does it contain such questions as.
1. Do you consider being chosen to be killed by a muslim obeying his religious duty, wrong?
2. Would you be tempted to make islamophobic, religiously intollerent or racist comments if your 12 year daughter was chosen to be a right hand possession of a muslim or muslims?
ninetyninepct says
Absolutely disgusting. What the hell is the Canadian Red Cross thinking? How pathetically naive. I have donated to them for years, more than any other organization, and never to the so called “christian” scams.
Never again will I waste another cent on the Canadian Red Cross. Islamist jihadists have taken the Red Cross for fools and suckers. I suggest they look up the word jizya.
The Heart Fund and the Salvation Army are the only ones left that are worthy of my money.
Rob says
‘Swedada’
Louise from Canada says
Red Cross, you are no longer on my list. No more money for you. If you are that stupid, you don’t deserve a penny from me.
Airborne869 says
THE
OBAMA
CLINTON’S
POWELL
KERRY
PELOSI
REID
LIBERAL NEWS NETWORKS
FOX NEWS INCLUDED
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
ARE ALL BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY
ISLAMIC OIL MONEY… AND CAIR
THEY ARE SECURING THEIR ECONOMIC FUTURES
FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN…
THE CLINTON FOUNDATION IS MOSTLY SAUDI ARABIAN MONEY
tommy651 says
shows how deeply the communists have infiltrated the red cross
Gea says
It is not PHOBIA when Muslims are really out to kill infidels! Islam is a totalitarian, supremacist,apartheid and imperialistic ideology of hate of all non-Muslims which does not belong to any decent society,