Sadiq Khan said attacks such as the jihad bombing in Chelsea were “part and parcel” of life in a big city. “It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things.” He also criticized Donald Trump for saying it was time to “get tough” on terrorism.
Sadiq Khan is not going to get tough on jihad terrorism. He appears to be much more concerned about those who want to do so than he is about the jihad terrorists themselves. He wants you to get used to it. Jihad terror, as far as Sadiq Khan is concerned, is just a feature of modern urban life.
“New York explosion: Sadiq Khan says terror attacks are ‘part and parcel of life in a big city,'” by Pippa Crear, Evening Standard, September 18, 2016:
Sadiq Khan revealed that he had a “sleepless” night while he waited to hear news about the explosion that rocked New York last night.
The Mayor, in the US city on an official visit, said his “thoughts and prayers” went to those injured by the blast….
Mr Khan, who is expected to meet New York mayor Bill de Blasio later today at an event with Muslim community leaders, said attacks were “part and parcel” of life in a big city.
“It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things,” he said.
“That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but also it means exchanging ideas and best practice.”
He added: “I’ve had a sleepless night thinking about all of this and I’m sure the Mayor has as well.”
Mr Khan criticised US presidential candidate Donald Trump – who said within minutes of the attack it was time to “get tough” – for speculating on the motives behind it….

Kumi Ho says
The only cities where ISLAMIST TERRORISM is part and parcel of an urban environment are cities with HIGH populations of non-assimilating non-native Muslims. It seems to me you have the problem, solution, and ancillary supporters very clearly delineated above.
jihad3tracker says
THE EVENING STANDARD HAS A COMMENT SECTION that seems not to be unfairly deleting factual and strong reality. One of our regular JW guys, DON MCKELLAR, has already posted remarks.
Please, all of us here, get going with your own efforts, and it would be a great idea to emphasize that YOU ARE AN AMERICAN.
You can also mention specific Qur’an verses that sanction slaughter against Infidels, and how Muhammad (the “Ideal Man”) beheading at least 700 Jews during his own life..
Also, of course, HOW ALLAH-LOVING MUSLIM MAYOR KHAN IS TOTALLY HAPPY FOR SUCH ATTEMPTED KILLING, ALTHOUGH HE WILL NEVER ADMIT IT.
Mirren10 says
”Please, all of us here, get going with your own efforts … ”
I did. My comment is ”awaiting moderation”. Bet they don’t post it.
Mirren10 says
I was right. They haven’t.
DAI says
they have mirren. read it myself
Mirren10 says
They posted my second one, not my first.
west_rhino says
Evening Standard’s not offered to be a target for offending groups other than Islamists, go figure why a double standard
Moses says
With leaders like these the future of Europe is at a big RISK even though I’m not a European I feel sad for western Europe.
Johan elzinga says
Thank you. I would like to know what those same people will say about this in about ten years, when the full catastrophy has unfolded. Will they state that their information at this time was incomplete? What will be their message to the families of the countless victims, that they should have worked closer together with the police? That it’s their own doing and a result of makung the muslims feel left out?
carol says
Yup, they all know talk is cheap. I wonder how many others have thoughts of eliminating them if they can’t show proper loyalty.
gravenimage says
They’ll probably be too busy kissing Muslim *ss to have anything to say to the victims.
Jay Boo says
(Not Our Problem Syndrome)
He might sing a different tune if a mass of Muslims were the target.
Rev g says
That would be part and parcel of a world truly understanding the tenets of islam.
David M says
Terrorism attacks in these cities are only “part and parcel” of them because of the large number of Muslims in them. Sadiq Khan, a Muslim mayor of a major western city, what a disgrace that is. I’m sure he will show his true self at some stage too.
Mirren10 says
”Terrorism attacks in these cities are only “part and parcel” of them because of the large number of Muslims in them.”
Exactly. And the more our ‘leaders’ bring in, the more such attacks there will be.
”I’m sure he will show his true self at some stage too.”
Oh, I think he already has. Sharia compliant ads on London buses is one example.
gravenimage says
Mirren, is that this story?
“London Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan enforces sharia: There will be no more ‘body shaming’ adverts on the Tube”
http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/london-muslim-mayor-sadiq-khan-enforces-sharia-there-will-be-no-more-body-shaming-adverts-on-the-tube.html/
Of course, framing this as being about “body shaming”–a non-concept, but very popular with “third wave” feminists–is the merest fig leaf over what are really Shari’ah strictures on showing any part of a woman not covered by a Burqa.
Mirren10 says
Yes, graven, that’s exactly what I was referring to.
Johan elzinga says
The city of the Hague banned a commercial on the tram lines that advocated that the Netherlands was full- with people wanting to let in more refugees. Reason of banning this advert was that they deemed it too controversial. At least some politicians now understood the message. Too late, I guess, I believe the end of the EU is near because of the refugee crisis.
gravenimage says
Yes–that story is disgusting, Mirren. I’m sure it won’t be the last, given the increasing pace of creeping Shari’ah.
gravenimage says
Here’s more on the Islamization of the Hague, Johan:
“Netherlands: Muslim politician calls for ban on dogs in the Hague”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/02/netherlands-muslim-politician-calls-for-ban-on-dogs-in-the-hague
God, I hate Islam. That its vile tenets are gaining ground in Europe–the cradle of modern democracy–is repulsive beyond words.
miriamrove says
He is another PC Islam loving DB….. So it is a part of life for us and our people to get blown away? Pathetic to say the least. m
gravenimage says
miriam, I think this is even worse than “political correctness” here–remember that Sadiq Khan is himself a Muslim, and wants us to simply accept it as a natural state that his coreligionists are acting to murder us on a regular basis.
epistemology says
That’s exactly the problem. These terrorist attacks are a sad reality these days and not only in big Western cities but anywhere in the world. But unlike earthquakes or other natural catastrophes they aren’t force majeure but man-made and only by a certain type of man. These perps are from different places and belong to different ethnic groups, but whatever they are they have one thing in common they’re always Muslims like mayor Khan and consequently they want to kill the infidels wherever they find them as the unholy Koran tells them.
Being their brother in spirit Khan wants to protect the perps more than his citizens, the innocent victims. He’s by no means another PC simpleton but an accessory to murder.
gravenimage says
Exactly, epistemology.
carol says
Exactly. Heard tell it was Pakistanis who managed to get this alien, who dares to pretend he’s “English”, on the throne. What they want is to wear us out by their ugly imperviousness until a new generation comes along that forgets what was and what’s real and what we’re owed by our leaders. They want to gradually erode our sense of self and “nationhood” probably so the grubby likes of George Soros, Goldman Sachs, the Clintons, and Obama etc. can have a one-world currency etc.and the rest of us become “powerless” thanks to religious fanatics.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
You’re right Miriam, and so are you Graven.
What a crock! ‘Part and parcel’ of a big city? I grew up in NYC. We were allowed to ride the city buses and take the subway starting at the age of 9. This was in the 60’s.
I was the oldest and I took my brothers-7 and 5-to the World’s Fair, SEVERAL times!
When the Beatles came to Shea Stadium, I got tickets and went with my school chum Maura. Her dad was a NYC cop who was on that detail. We went, stayed and had the time of our lives! Of course we never HEARD anything but screaming at the concert, but hey, we were ROCKIN’!
Now we were certainly told not to get in a stranger’s car, not to talk to strangers, yada yada yada. But my parents and those of all my friends, never for one second imagined that roving bands of vicious muslims, trying to kill innocent people, were ‘part and parcel’ of life in the Big Apple!
TRUMP ’16.
linnte says
You should have heard Toni Bugle rail on Khan after his statements about “part and parcel”! She said basically the same thing you said, but about LONDON! Toni has more common sense than most British/English people do.
Bob Smyth says
Sadiq Khan saying that ‘his “thoughts and prayers” went to those injured by the blast’, is the usual pro-forma statement. Basically, ‘appearing to be concerned’ whilst effectively saying NOTHING. Whereas, even a ‘hint’ that ‘Islamophobia’ MIGHT have occurred and Sadiq Khan would have been ALL OVER IT. Demanding that the Metropolitan Police commit UNLIMITED resources to investigate it.
Carolyne says
If I were injured in that NYC blast, I would not want a Muslim’s “Thoughts and Prayers.” His thoughts are uncivilized and his prayers are to the devil.
Rosewood11 says
Well said, Carolyne!!! And, more importantly, absolutely TRUE!!!
carol says
You bring up an important question Carolyne…What in the WORLD do these devils pray over?
1/ more supremacist fantasies?
2/ more oblivion and callousness?
3/ more power to slay or cow those who believe differently?
4/ more jizya taxes and slaves to ease their suffering?
5/ bigger bombs to shower upon the Israelis?
6/ more banishment of intellectuals from our universities?
7/ more kindness and coddling from the stupid kuffar?
8/ more pale-skinned hoes and/or raisins in heaven?
Does anyone have any answers to this? I mean what good is Islam if ALL we see is the “fruit of their action”?
gravenimage says
His “thoughts and prayers” are probably for as high a body count as possible…
RAB says
I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why all Muslims are not responsible for jihadi terrorist attacks (i.e. actions by devout Muslims carrying out the will of Allah) since they all claim to follow the same “holy book,” the Koran. Maybe I’m missing something here, but it seems to me that every man, woman, and child who professes to be a Muslim (including the Muslim Mayor of London) either directly or indirectly supports and is therefore responsible for the continuing inherent violence and intolerance in the Islamic texts. The Islamic State “cubs of the Caliphate” and the Palestinian children being taught hatred of infidels are just as dangerous as the adults and should be treated equally. If I’m wrong, tell me why.
abad says
But they are.
Islam is all about one huge collective worshipping Allah, adhering to the Quran, Hadith, Sharia, Jihad, etc.
The problem is this:
Muslims will not admit to being the collective (no such thing as an individual in Islam; the concept of an individual presupposes that one can do one’s own thinking, something that is strictly forbidden in Islam).
That is where taqiyya comes in.
billybob says
Muslims are all part of the world body of the ummah. There is no denying that, as it the concept is integral to Islam. Now step back and view this body from the wrong end of a telescope, so that it appears as a single organism. You will see it vaguely appears like one would have a mental image of Muhammad, carrying a sword, and with a ferocious gaze as he goes about slaying infidels. Whether an individual Muslim is a cell within the feet of this body, or a cell within the brain or the stomach or the lung, a blood cell or a skin cell, they all play a part in animating the ummah monster.
G. R. Gunning says
Nice analogy.
Don McKellar says
STRANGE how terrorism was never “part and parcel” of life in the big city until the moslems moved in, eh wot, Sadiq Khan — you taqiyya spewing piece of human garbage.
overman says
Strange, also, how New York gets a ‘TRIPLE’ attack as soon as khan pays a visit.
overman says
“Strange, also, how New York gets a ‘TRIPLE’ attack as soon as khan pays a visit”
Sorry that should have been across America.
linnte says
This thought crossed my mind too! Odd that Khan is here and his buddies are showing off for him. To me Sadiq Khan is worse than Anjem Choudary. At least Anjem was honest about his hatred for non Muslims.
gravenimage says
So true, Don.
Michael Laudahn says
‘Part and parcel of life in a big city’? I am several decades older than you are, young man, I am from a major city in continental western Europe, and I can inform you that we hardly ever experienced anything like that. It all started only with mohammedan immigration, more precisely after they had reached the numbers where they felt they controleld the situation (due to our useless politicians) and were safe enough to act as they please.
Bob says
Too damned true Michael. I’m a Londoner, & it was a safe city before the ‘no-go’ areas existed – you know, the areas which the police and the politicos deny exist! And when I was younger there was a policeman on every corner – now they’re busy filling in forms and they’re rarely seen. I rather doubt if Khan intends to improve the situation!
Alien Republican says
Skinheads stomping muslims too.
gravenimage says
Where are “skinheads” attacking Muslims? This is just more of the usual claim that we are victimizing Muslims, when reality is that it is them victimizing *us*.
Alien Republican says
That was a long time ago, in the 80’s. You see, “white westerners” have become even more peaceful while society overall has not. Another ailement of the 80’s has gone as well – mass killings during football games by “hooligans*.
carol says
Sounds like (as usual) some Islamist is using their gaudy brush to try to distract from larger issues by smearing us with incorrect colors. How typically trivial and disgusting. You don’t fool anyone over twenty and with an average IQ. You might fool Muslims though.
gravenimage says
Alien Republican, I am *no* fan of soccer hooliganism. My husband spent time in London after college before we met and he saw some of it up close and personal. If he was sitting with the away fans they often had to be escorted by police to board trains. Hooligans were often rowdy and aggressive, and sometimes even threatening.
But the claim that there were *mass killings* at football game is just absurd.
There was a fan killed in a riot between fans in 1982. A boy was killed when a wall collapsed during a riot at a game in 1985. The most notorious incident was when 39 fans were crushed to death in a stampede at a game in Brussels which was instigated by Liverpool fans. Hooliganism was suspected at first in the terrible Hillsborough Stadium disaster–where 98 fans were crushed against a chain-link fence–but it was later ruled out.
All of this led to a continent-wide crack down on soccer hooligans–as well as improved safety measures as stadiums.
But as appalling and stupid as this all was, the idea that soccer hooligans engaged in *mass killings* as Jihadists do is simply incorrect.
Mirren10 says
”If I’m wrong, tell me why.”
You’re not wrong, RAB.
It’s time *everyone* stopped pussyfooting and shillyshallying around this. The koran is just a book. It doesn’t set bombs or strap on a suicide vest and blow people up, or commit atrocities. **mohammedans** do. Acting **according** to the tenets of the koran.
I agree with you. *Every* mohammedan is responsible, either because they agree with the tenets, or wilfully try to pretend they mean something other than they do.
Politicians and the msm are also **complicit**, every time they try to whitewash this foul religion, and its adherents.
Charli Main says
Exactly so, M10
Hating islam is as pointless as hating the guns, bombs and knives that are used to murder people.
Islam thrives because Muslims continue to practice and believe in the ravings of Mad Mohammed of Mecca.
That’s why I HATE MUSLIMS.
Mirren10 says
”That’s why I HATE MUSLIMS.”
Hear, hear, Charli. Me too.
linnte says
Hummmmmm….. I hadn’t thought of it that way Mirren. (My brain has to think on this!) It is true that the ideology is behind the action of Muslims who Jihad. So logically, if one is a Muslim, and one believes the ideology, therefore Muslims are the reason, not the ideology. Man, Islam SUCKS!
carol says
You know it really ISN’T a religion. It’s a power trip sprinkled with sugar to make it palatable to it’s prey. It’s also essentially a SOCIAL CLUB where everyone gets to hold hands in the dark and feel good about themselves. It’s like a maze that you HAVE to make the best of until you no longer see it for what it is – especially in the eyes of the clear-sighted outside world.
Angemon says
No, terrorist attacks are a part and parcel of, for example, Baghdad or Karachi. Can you guess why?
As if anyone with a clear mind had doubts of where Khan’s true allegiance lies – it seems that for Mr. Khan it’s more important not to speculate on the motive of a muslim bomber than to get tough on terrorism.
mohamonator says
Khan is a cynical realist. He is just trying to prepare, or perhaps I should say, soften up, the residents of Londonistan and other large British cities for what he KNOWS is coming.
davej says
Notable that he has no criticism of his coreligionists, just a cynical “get used to it” comment.
Muslim ideology means you will have to suffer pipe bombs, pressure cooker bombs, truck attacks, random stabbings, beheadings of priests, etc. All perfectly normal – to them.
Our cities more and more resemble the mayhem we see in the home countries ruled by the Religion of Peace.
mohamonator says
Even if Khan were to criticize the jihadis–unlikely, I know–he knows he would be targeted as an apostate and probably be shot or blown up within a month. Anjem Choudary and his followers would crow that “Khan had met the divine justice of allah”.
Mirren10 says
” … he knows he would be targeted as an apostate … ”
Unlikely. Khan is a stealth jihadist who has successfully infiltrated local government. He is insidiously instituting sharia on London Transport, and is now trying to suggest that we, as good dhimmis, accept jihad murderers as the ‘new normal’.
As you can see from what he says in the article, the only thing Khan will say about mohammedan jihad murderers is to accuse us of being ‘islamophobes’ and imply that Trump is dangerous for speaking the truth. A soothing lie/bromide is much better for keeping the infidels quiet until the mohammedan population in Britain reaches 50%. Then the mask will *really* come off.
gravenimage says
Yes–Sadiq Khan is the very model of a stealth Jihadist.
TheOldOligarch says
It doesn’t need to be anywhere near 50% before the bloodbath begins. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t war before 20%. Remember that young males are basically the only demographic that matters for the purposes of determining who is running things, and the Muslim population is much younger than the Infidel population. Luckily, I also think that the Mohammedans will force open war with their murderous aggression and bloodlust long before they have the numbers to actually win.
Mirren10 says
” … the Mohammedans will force open war with their murderous aggression and bloodlust long before they have the numbers to actually win.”
Open war ? Can you see May, or any of her traitorous cohorts, signing up for that ? I think it far more likely we, the ordinary people will be compelled to defend our children, our homes, our lives and our property. Whereupon May, or her successor will promptly declare martial law, send in the army, and arrest and imprison anyone who **defends themselves against mohammedan attacks**. The mohammedans will be let off scot free.
Bob says
Or even in court charged with ‘hate speech’!!
Georg says
“He also criticized Donald Trump for saying it was time to ‘get tough’ on terrorism.”
Oh, so progressive. Superlative virtue. I see a Nobel in someone’s future.
Guy Jones says
This is the complacent, stupefied dhimmi posture that the Left wants to instill in people — to make people resigned to the notion of terrorism as an inevitable and unavoidable inconvenience of modern life, as inevitable as bad weather, traffic and taxes. It’s an attitude borne of multiculturalist naivete and myopic moral relativism.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Gen. While Sadiq Khan is himself a Muslim stealth Jihadist, there are also passive, clueless, faux “sophisticated” Infidels who echo his demand that we just *get used to this*.
Some here at Jihad Watch have actually cheered Jihad terror attacks in the belief that more attacks will wake Infidels up–but I have always noted that some will just become inured to this barbarism and accept it as the “new normal”.
Georg says
Khan greases the tracks.
Raja says
Terrorism- part and parcel of life in big city is nice way of accepting an Islamic shot/injection. It is similar to tone of the French Prime minister who recently said that you have to live with terrorism (of Islam).
This is how Islam the evil system (with sensual pleasures assured in after-life) masquerading as a religion operates that too in the first world.
Having bombarded with all lies and deceit about Islam and slandering all faiths excluding Islam it has taken the place of pre-eminence in the West as a “relgion”. The left and liberals with hardly any functional brains toed the Islamic line. Islam is hyper active with all kinds of propaganda and war and terror maneuvering to keep its flock happy and focused in pursuit of greater goal of global Islamic hegemony.
Sadly we lack a leader like Winston Churchill. Till then evil leaders tell us to look the other way or take the shot /injection without whining /complaining as those in Islamic gutter nations do.
Michael says
Do we hear the thinly veiled threat? “Get used to this, we’re coming for you and your’s.”
This is no way to conduct WW III. The time is well past to suffer these “leaders”. Treason is the word for these actions. Or rather, Khan and his ilk have an alternate allegiance other than their supposed citizenship. Their contempt is so blatant, so smug. They think they are above every law and every possible reprisal. They are assuredly wrong.
gravenimage says
Yes–this *is* a threat, and a demand for surrender.
Raja says
How come Japan is not facing similar terror attacks as the West does?
Being Islam-free she is blessed with peace..
gravenimage says
Alas, Japan is *not* Islam free. She has a growing population of Muslims, and Mosques in her cities.
But Japan is far from Dar-al-Islam, and does not have a lot of immigration in general–so so far she has been safer from Jihad terror than most.
clap says
If the muslims in Japan do start carrying out terrorist attacks, the government would come down hard on islam. I wouldn’t be suprised if Japan outright banned islam from their country in order to prevent such attacks.
Georg says
“How come Japan is not facing similar terror attacks as the West does?”
Because they’re racist ethnocentric xenophobic supremacist retrograde illiberal isolationist far-right Islamophobes who may even have hatred in their hearts.
But since they have black hair you won’t hear that from any liberal.
carol says
Georg – if that’s true then at least we can credit them for not trying to inflict it on others (at least not for many decades now) and for knowing how to stick up for their own people and their own values rather than looking like they’re going to default to a pile of you-know-what with barely a whimper.
I sometimes wonder about countries like India who have power plus some serious grudges against Islam, or China that has lots of people and prompt authoritarian will. My unsophisticated hunch is that Islamists aren’t eager at all to run up against that brick wall.
carol says
I gorgot – I’d like to see a face-off with North Korea too. They would be well-matched in insanity.
Georg says
I respect Japan for their self-preserving ways. But I am irritated that the West accepts people from all over, often at their own peril (both cultural and mortal) and are meanwhile deemed racist while Japan is very resistent to non-Japanese moving there (mostly for cultural but also mortal reasons) yet are never in the crosshairs of pundits on cable news or papers-of-record such as The New York Times. Funny how the enlightened leverage most all their righteous outrage at one race who happens to be the most accepting and helpful to others out of them all.
You will not see a Khan running the show in China.
Georg says
Coincidentally, you will not see terror being part-and-parcel of life in big Chinese cities.
And yes, send a bunch to North Korea where they can be free from Western oppression.
Rosewood11 says
Excuse me, Mr. Mayor, but no, it’s NOT!!! Unless you live a country full of low-life muslims, that is. America made it through many years without this kind of nonsense, and the biggest mistake either Europe or America ever made was allowing ANY muslims into our countries. If you think this is normal, then that’s just one more proof that you are not able to live in polite society. I personally thought that making all refugees eat a piece of bacon and sing a Christmas Carol (thank you Saturday Night Live) was an excellent idea. Now, we can add the question, “Do you think an occasional bomb blast is something normal citizens just have to get used to?” If the answer is “yes,” then send them back where they came from–FOREVER!!!
gravenimage says
After NYC bomb, London’s Muslim mayor says terror attacks “part and parcel” of life in a big city
………………………..
This *evil b*stard*. Jihad terror was not “part and parcel” of life in the civilized West until his vicious coreligionists started flooding into our countries.
Just fifteen years ago this insanity was not “part and parcel” of life in any Western Infidel nation; in fact, would have been inconceivable that any of us would consider it to be.
And was his “sleepless night” spent hoping his fellow Muslims had not murdered any of us–or that they *had*?
Champ says
After NYC bomb, London’s Muslim mayor says terror attacks “part and parcel” of life in a big city
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you weren’t sure before, then this *insightful* gem from Khan should remove all doubt about whether or not he’s a lying taqiyya meister. Perfect last name too ..”Khan” aka Con.
eduardo odraude says
The mayor is a liar. Terrorism is not part of life in the city. It’s part everyday life in a city where Muslims have access. Sadiq Kahn is one of the “worst of creatures.”
eduardo odraude says
The mayor is just trying to “normalize” Islamic terror, without mentioning the word Islam. He’s saying, “Nothing to see here folks, move along…” F. him, him and his anti-Hindu, anti-Jewish, anti-Buddhist, anti-Christian pseudo-prophet bigot and dictator Muhammad.
Islam the religion of killers says
Sadiq Khan said attacks such as the jihad bombing in Chelsea were “part and parcel” of life in a big city. “It is a reality.”
This is political speak for “us scumbags have arrived, get used lots of violence until we beat everyone into submission”
fds says
He’s a supremacist. You can tell it from the belligerence in his eyes.
John Boston says
Sadiq Khan was elected by a majority of Londoners. I assume this means the people of London are mostly followers of Muhammad (salallaahu alaihe wa salaam). If they were not Muslims, they were suicidal. Now their Muslim mayor is advocating that London, and by extension the UK, should accept terrorism as “part and parcel” of urban life. No. Civilized people will never accept terrorism as a normal part of life.
The basic problem here, as elsewhere, is that Islam itself is not “part and parcel” of life in the West. Just the meaning of the word Islam, “Submission”, should tell us that Islam cannot coexist with a free state. Islam is an affront to Liberty: freedom to speak and to share ideas, especially ideas that “offend” some people; freedom of women to dress as they please without being attacked; freedom to worship (or not) as we choose. We need to halt Islam in its tracks and demand that the followers of Muhammad (salallaahu alaihe wa salaam) respect the values of Liberty that we in the West have painstakingly established. Otherwise, they are free to leave.
Charli Main says
That Muslim dog turd got elected Mayor of London because he brilliantly played the “I’m one of you” card.
All those Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists that voted for Khan, will live to regret their stupidity, in voting for a Muslim stealth Jihadist.
Wellington says
Khan is a bad guy, and certainly an enemy of liberty. This is the long and short of it.
What a tragedy and bitter irony therefore that he is mayor of a city which pioneered freedom at least as much as any city in the world has since ancient Athens.
Michael says
Wilberforce rolls in his grave.
Wellington says
Yep. As does Churchill. Gladstone. Disraeli. Peel. Bagehot. Ah, a long list to be sure.
gravenimage says
Britain has a proud history–but now stands in dire peril, and all too few Britons even appear to grasp it.
Georg says
“part and parcel of life in a big city”
So I’m assuming there are no big cities without terrorism, nor have there ever been.
Georg says
Is it “part and parcel” or “vanishingly rare”?
Norger says
It all depends on whether you want to minimize (“vanishly rare”) or deflect (hey this part of life in the big city”) attention upon the obvious link between Islam and terrorism.
Khan wants us to adopt the “battered spouse” mindset; terrorism is inevitable, and if it does happen, it’s because people like Trump unfairly hurt the delicate feelings of the Islamic terrorists, who would otherwise just be peacefully nursing their seething hatred of everything we stand for. . It really is like Orwellian mind control.
Carolyne says
Islamic violence is not “Vanishingly rare” but I hope people like DiBlasio are.
Eric Jones says
How did this guy Sadiq khan get elected mayor of London in the first place?
Eric
Bob says
Easy Eric – London has become Londistan, and the near-majority ‘stan’ part voted for him!!
Heather says
I despise satan and I despise his slaves (muslims).
Kay says
“part and parcel’ . . .
. . . not people we care about, not a city we are proud of, not a world where we can do good and alleviate suffering, not even to question in search for the root of a problem in order to improve things, not the way westerners have looked at the places and peoples they love . . . but a new reality by Islam where terrorism is the norm. Grief upon grief.
linnte says
Khan’s posture in this photo is typical of his always posture. Defiant superiority. Poor England. Her prized city, home of Democracy, is ruled by a Pakistani Muslim. How horrible!
Archangel says
I have a problem with Kahn referring to the Islamic atrocities (you name the vilest acts
against humanity and they have done it!) as “. . .these sorts of things.” ! The man is a monster.
G. R. Gunning says
We seem to be treating the Muslim invasion as some sort of accident or “happenstance.” It’s not. It’s been carefully orchestrated by our despicable governments and the EU for over 50 years in the name of globalism, world communism, New World Order, Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – call it what you will.. We should be fighting our government with every weapon we have. The trouble is that about 80% of our population are unaware of it, don’t care about it, utterly ignorant, lack foresight, head in sand and worst of all – complicit. My own friends and family say to me “why do you go on about it so much?” As though, like them, saying nothing will make it go away. We are like a piece of low-hanging fruit, ripe for the taking and I’m sure the world of Islam is well aware of that.
linnte says
My family too, except for a small portion of them, think I am nuts and wonder why I talk about the NWO. It’s about FREEDOM. That’s why I speak of it so much! It’s about the return of Jesus too, I believe.
Rosewood11 says
You have only to listen to major radio shows like Coast to Coast AM, and you’ll hear many people concerned about the NWO. My personal favorite show is Trunews.com with Rick Wiles. He is a Christian man, and has brought out some information about NATO and the EU that completely changed my views. Vladimir Putin is right, folks. He wants Russia to be Russia, and sovereign unto itself. Gee, time was we wanted that in the US, too. Right now, we have an ongoing fight worldwide (Brexit, BRICS, etc) between Nationalists and Globalists (the latter sometimes called the NeoCons). hillary clinton is a neo-con and a Globalist. If you want to be part of the kingdom of the Antichrist, a vote for hillary will do that for you. I don’t know that a vote for Trump will stave it off, but at least it’s a chance. If hillary gets in, you better pray that Putin values the lives of non-Orthodox Christians as much as he does the people he been defending in Syria, or we’ll all end up in FEMA camps!!!
carol says
It’s amazing the tidbits one picks up along the way e.g. George Soros has been a real financial backer of Hillary Clinton; President Obama’s wedding ring has been worn since long before his marriage and it says “There is no god but Allah”.
Praeceptor Maximus says
He added: “I’ve had a sleepless night thinking about all of this and I’m sure the Mayor has as well.”
I am sure he had a sleepless night; he was celebrating the triumph of Islam over the west. Had it been otherwise, he wouldn’t have criticized Trump for saying that it was time to “get tough”.
gravenimage says
True.
Carolyne says
I have known a number of Muslims in my lifetime, which is rather long compared to most of you I believe. While they might appear to be civilized and Westernized, underneath it there is a secret pride in the violence perpetrated by everyday Muslims and ISIS. The ones I have known see nothing wrong with Zizya and think it is a fair solution for non-Muslims living in conquered lands,
One so-called “Civilized” Muslim man told me that a daughter is like a peach, the owner should get the first bite. I was disgusted and told him so but he didn’t and couldn’t understand the wrongness in this.
mach37 says
What is most incredible is that Muslims have actually conquered the UK while remaining a minority. The USA is rapidly going the same way.
gravenimage says
Horrible but not surprising, Carolyn.
west_rhino says
Kahn could be lying.
Carmel says
I really hope , one day , that Sadiq ( what a good name for such a man ) , yes , I really hope that Sadiq Khan will be close , very close to such ” part and parcel “. It would be the experience of a lifetime for him.
mach37 says
Every non-Muslim who voted for a Muslim mayor must justify their reason for putting the enemy of infidels at the head of the city government.
Looking for the right Arabic word to describe how Khan must have persuaded infidels: Tawriya and Kitman seem to fit. Tawriya, meaning “creative lying to conceal”; and Kitman, covering “ambiguous statements; lie to smooth over differences; secrecy; concealment.”
Has Khan done what Obama did? Packed the city administrative offices with Muslims?
carol says
I wondered if it had a name, hmm…KITMAN…e.g. when they claim to respect Jesus and yet reveal they think he’s only worthy of sheltering underneath their big black wing; when they claim there are “mass murders” at Western soccer games but we’re milder people now etc. I think they practice and enjoy Kitman even more than taqqiya!!
Crusades Were Right! says
Which is worse? Being called a “racist” or “Islamophobe”, or enduring the ever-growing risk of getting murdered, maimed, blinded, crippled, or, in the case of your descendants in the not-too-distant future, enslaved, by Mohammedans?
When you’ve managed to figure out the correct answer:
“SEND THE BUGGERS BACK!”
carol says
They aren’t worthy of climbing to the top of the pile. EVERYONE CAN SEE THEY HAVE NO MORAL AUTHORITY. It’s the money flow that has to be stopped as it’s the ONLY leverage they have. GRAB THE OIL TRUMP AND HURRY!
Louise M. says
— Mr Sadist Khan: “It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things.”
— West Reply: ”True, but only as long as its cause, the Muslim Problem, has not been dealt with.”
As a Muslim, Mr Khan may have experienced ”these sorts of things” all of his life.
We have not. We have known, and we will know better.
Karen says
Excellent point. And Mr. Obama, in his heart of heart asks, “why should Americans be safe from terrorism, Ebola, Zika? Why should Americans have warm homes, cars, energy security?” Etc., etc.
Vig Orniensis says
This man is a denizen and accordingly cannot have any position of power.He must be removed immediately, as must ALL denizens in this country. The law was made for very good reasons and our liberal classes have allowed this to pass under the radar.
GET RID OF ALL DENIZENS
Karen says
“Yawn, just the new normal. Nothin’ to see here folks”, says Mayor Khan.