In Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Islamic world, this kind of behavior is broadly tolerated. Women are so devalued, men look to other men and boys for sexual pleasure. Also, the Qur’an promises not just virgins to the blessed, but boys like “scattered pearls”:
“Those are the ones brought near in the Gardens of Pleasure, a company of the former peoples and a few of the later peoples, on thrones woven, reclining on them, facing each other. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal with vessels, pitchers and a cup from a flowing spring.” — Qur’an 56:11-18
“And they will be given to drink a cup whose mixture is of ginger, a fountain within Paradise named Salsabeel. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look there, you will see pleasure and great dominion.” — Qur’an 76:17-20
“Muslim refugee, 20, who raped a boy, 10, in his Sydney home says what he did ‘is not a crime because it is acceptable in his homeland,'” by Belinda Cleary and Belinda Grant Geary, Daily Mail Australia, August 31, 2016 (thanks to Kenneth):
A refugee who raped a ten-year-old boy has claimed he did not know sexually assaulting the child was wrong as it was ‘culturally acceptable’ in his homeland.
Mufiz Rahaman told Sydney’s Downing Centre Court raping children was not seen as morally wrong in his native Myanmar when he pleaded guilty to the aggravated sexual assault of a 10-year-old refugee on Wednesday, the Daily Telegraph reported.
The 20-year-old and his young victim are both stateless Rohingya Muslims – a group of people considered illegal immigrants from Bangladesh by the Buddhist-majority in Myanmar – who came to Australia to flee religious persecution.
The court heard Rahaman preyed on the young boy while he was living with a group of refugees, including his father, at a vacant RSL club in Lakemba, a suburb in Sydney’s south west, on January 8, 2015.
According to documents tendered to the court, he crept into the child’s bedroom – which he shared with his father – as he slept and took off the boy’s underpants.
He then raped the boy, who arrived in Australia in 2013, while his father was in another room preparing lunch.
When the boy’s father returned he noticed the door had been shut and overheard Rahaman tell the boy: ‘I’ll give you money for this.’
‘My father will hit me,’ the boy responded.
The boy’s dad stormed into the room and found Rahaman lying on top of his son who was face down on the bed with his pants around his knees.
He asked: ‘What are you doing to this little boy? You’re an adult.’
The paedophile denied doing anything to his son but the young boy told his father he had been raped.
Rahaman, who came to Australia in 2012, was arrested two days later after another family member reported the incident to police.
He submitted to a DNA test which was matched with semen found on the victim.
According to the Daily Telegraph, Rahaman told the court he had been a victim of sexual abuse as a child before he moved to Australia.
Judge Andrew Scotting said Rahaman failed to understand his actions would ‘physically’ and ‘psychologically damage’ his young victim.
He also said Rahaman, who insisted he thought sexual assault was not seen as morally wrong in his homeland, had not accepted responsibility for his actions and demonstrated a ‘lack of morality’, according to the Daily Telegraph.
‘There is a need for specific deterrence … The offence appears to have been (viewed) as being culturally acceptable conduct in the offender’s childhood,’ Judge Scotting said….

Aussirick says
No doubt he will be let off with a slap on the wrist as he comes from a society where this is NORMAL behaviour, and surprise surprise he didn’t know it was illegal here, this is just about as stupid a defence as the moslem here in Melbourne who was convicted, and then let off on a rape charge as ” he didn’t understand our laws ” and the poor man was suffering PTSD. What a disgusting load of crap!!
Angry Aussie says
Agree with you. It’s happening all over Australia and our legal system allows them to walk away for the most part. This is cultural enrichment in action.
Chris says
I don’t know about in Australia, but in America, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
JMB says
Ignorance of the law is no excuse as you will quickly find out if say the Highway Patrol pulls you over for a traffic infringement. But it is known for Muslims to totally ignore our road laws, they even feel they are above the law. Likewise they seem to be above all of our other laws including sexual assault and the right to have child brides.
This is the first I have heard of this news story, thank you J W. But I also note that he is from Burma, I assume part of the persecuted Muslim ethnic minority in that country. They all appear to be of Bengal nationality, they should be sent to Bangladesh. They don’t belong in Australia but I instinctively knew that the do-gooders would be bring them here sooner or later.
I feel that the only suitable punishment for this creep should be deportation (including his family) following at least 10 years prison. (But as the Indonesian people smugglers say; Life in our jails is better than life in Indonesia as a free man!)
Tom says
I weep for the future of the global society. This Islamic cancer is spreading and the libtards are sucking it up like nectar from heaven.
suness says
The answer is education. We must all encourage others to educate themselves about this issue.
bernie says
People who think that he should get a lower sentence because “it’s acceptable in his culture” should also insist that charges should not be pressed against people from cannibalistic cultures who murder and eat people, because they didn’t know that Australians, Americans, Canadians etc. are incultuated to eat hamburgers instead of people.
Lysette says
So they are against gays in the western wrld so why do they beleive tht raping men is acceptable in their own sick QURAN double standards they don’t like our way of living well get to fck bk to your own cuntry then you won’t feel the way they do simple
Myrtle Linder says
If this is true, it is no wonder Muslims practice such evils; do they practice on Muslims or only on other peoples?.
e
john spielman says
1)islam is a demonic religion – allah of islam is Satan of the Bible.
2)muhmammed himself was a self professed demon possessed mass murderer thief liar and pedophile false prophet so yes, muslims do these evil deeds routinely as they revere him as their ‘”perfect man”!
gravenimage says
The victim in this case is a Muslim boy, Myrtle. Mohammedans love to rape Infidels, but will rape anyone who is vulnerable.
showmespfld says
Funny how homosexuality is punishable by death and yet the homosexual rape of young boys is for fun and entertainment? The utter and complete lack of logic as well as the evil that is the teaching of this so-called religion is mind boggling.
gravenimage says
showmespfld, the thing in Islam is that pedophilia and homosexual rape to humiliate are generally considered Halal; it is only affectionate consensual same sex relationships that are considered abominations calling for the death penalty.
Carolyne says
I think anyone is fair game because in their own countries, the law doesn’t recognize such activities as crimes.
Kepha says
I don’t know the exact law in Myanmar, but I strongly suspect that there is a flourishing sex industry there catering to every depraved taste there is. When I was in Thailand back in the ’90’s, there was trafficking of women and boys from countries around Thailand to serve the Thai sex industry.
quota raven says
Hmmm. Very disquieting article. That he pleaded guilty indicates a plea bargain, with his pleading guilty to some lesser charges, ie. dropping some more serious charges. But this is just informed speculation. The judge is the one we should be concerned about. He is dangerous.
Cheers!
quota raven
john spielman says
so this muslim thinks that western society is as “holy” as his islamic crapistan was,so that pedophilia is acceptable and enouraged.( No wonder the Burmese Buddhists kicked all the muslims out!)
After his imprisonment, he should be deported to Myranmar and face the Buddhist justice
biff says
Not knowing the law never works for regular folks.
With Muslims it’s perfectly acceptable. He will be out of jail in hours and given “counselling” so he understands his new country rules.
Poor kid. Buggered by some greasy Muzzie. Now the kid will grow up doing it also.
Peggy says
I wonder if this can be used as a precedent. Why are only Muslims allowed to be excused because they don’t know the law.
Many of us don’t know the law in it’s entirety either but we know right from wrong.
carpediadem says
He was actually sentenced to five years and was sexually abused as a child.
Frank Anderson says
Would it be in Australia that he will be abused in prison? That happens a lot in US prisons because a number of inmates were abused along their way to entering a “life of crime”.
gravenimage says
Not all those abused grow up to be abusers–I was abused and raped as a child, and that makes me more determined than ever to protect children from the same. But I also did not grow up in a culture that sacralized such abuse.
Angemon says
You mean that after setting foot in Australia he didn’t magically became as Australian as a kangaroo?!?!?!
JMB says
As the do-gooders keep telling us; “They are people just like us” (What could go wrong?)
carol says
There’d be natural fear and/or crying on the child’s part. What kind of creature would be unfazed by that? Something is totally lacking or desensitized.
lb4t says
Right! After being in the country since 2012, he didn’t know??? I call BS. Also, the comment that he was abused as a child in his home country. This little eff has all the excuses lined up!
gravenimage says
Yes–important point. The Muslim rapist had been in civilized Australia for *three years* when he raped this boy.
Tired says
Interesting enough he must known it’s wrong because he offered to pay the boy and the boy knew he would get hit for it. That should be an eye opener for the judge, I guess he missed and the molester will be on the streets again.
linnte says
If the father heard the man say he would give the boy money, then he KNEW it was wrong. Paedophiles are always going to be a paedophile. Now this boy gets to live with this rape his whole life. I believe in capital punishment for paedophiles. It’s the only way to cure them because this is unfixable. He WILL assault again, given the chance. Why imprison him even? And this Judge is most likely going to rule a lesser sentence? Australians should be outraged!
Tired says
Agreed. Paedophiles usually don’t get better on their own.
Frank Anderson says
I have read, and heard in many seminars, that there is almost 100% repeat offense among child abusers. There does not appear to be any rehabilitation. This makes a false charge of child abuse absolutely devastating to a wrongly accused. And, False Charges happen because they are easy to make, there is an almost irrebuttable presumption of guilt, intense jury appeal for the prosecution, and massive favorable publicity for the prosecutor bringing the charge and the police giving news interviews and testimony. To provide a fair trial that is due under the Constitution demands first and foremost an incredibly fair judge, which in my experience is rare, not unknown, but rare..Really bad things ought to happen to the guilty; but not to those who are not.
gravenimage says
Frank, there is *no* reason to believe that this pedophile was falsely accused. The victim’s father caught him in the act, and the rapist himself has confessed to the crime.
Frank Anderson says
I WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree in this case there is no reason to believe this guy was falsely accused, starting from the evidence, going to testimony and concluding with the guilty plea.
Having had to defend a number of false accusations, a word of caution should be added so that future cases are examined with thought rather than passion and outrage. My honored and treasured Uncle, whom I have mentioned before, taught me as long as I knew him that there are at least 3 sides to every story, yours, mine and right. I have seen abuse of the legal system, and have crushed 2 false accusations that I had breached my duty, which is why I seem to know something about those duties. While those of us accused of islamophobia are presumed guilty, there is in the US supposed to be a presumption of not guilty until proven.
It is my understanding that “common law” countries share this presumption. But I believe, and ask for correction if in error, that in civil law (based on the Code Napoleon) jurisdictions the burden of proof of not guilty is on the defense. Remember that “not guilty” is not the same as “innocent”. “Not guilty” means that all the elements necessary for a conviction are not present. “Innocent” means that NO elements are present.
The rapist we are discussing in this article has made it clear that he deserves no sympathy and in fact deserves to be isolated from civilized people as long as he lives, however short that may be. Thank you for raising the question and allowing me to discuss my view.
gravenimage says
OK, Frank–thanks.
Walter Sieruk says
That Muslim man who committed that crime has in his trying to defend himself against criminal charges, is really coming and admitting that Muslim countries are primitive and savage because of Islam which reflects Islam is “values.” The Muslims in those countries because of their religion have heinously wicked “values.” So the people in those Islamic countries must be totally devoid of the basic knowledge of the obvious difference between right and wrong. Therefore those hideous Muslim “values” are the fruits of Islam. Once again with this information is very fitting to quote the Wisdom of Jesus. For Jesus taught “By their fruit you will recognize them.” Matthew 7:20. [N.I.V.]
Mark A says
Interesting that the 10 year old’s father didn’t seem to think that a 20 year old raping a 10 year old was culturally acceptable.
Mary says
Exactly!
Judge ought to point out that he was hiding his actions, thereby proving he knew they were wrong…..
Pong says
Strange, father was in another room and didn’t hear anything?
carpediadem says
Sexual abusers are very good at being furtive, even in the same room as others.
Just think of those kinds of a-holes who harass people verbally under their breath so no one but the victim hears or those whose hands are very active but act all innocent when called out, again even in crowded rooms.
Carolyne says
Yes, that awful Dugger boy said he molested his sister while she was sitting on his lap in a room of other people.
ploome says
I know everyone will hate me
but who cares what they do to each other
somehow we have to stop their entry in our countries, and send those here back
we are arranging our own demise if we continue as we are doing with these ‘refugees’
Michael Copeland says
“Refugees”:
Young fit males of military age forcing their way
into places they have no right to be,
at the behest of people who have no right to invite them,
on behalf of people who don’t want them.
MC in Sderot
http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/08/refugee/#more-40745
EYESOPEN says
Well and succinctly put, MC.
Hi Moe says
Hate? I doubt it.
Guest says
We need to care because if we leave them alone, they will never change. They will keep believing that it is right to rape children. And they will keep on believing we are demons who have to die and try to kill us over and over. We need to occupy the Middle East and put a stop to this. We must seperate the children from this savage ideology, we must execute anyone who commits murder and rape. The world may hate us but the truth is they brought this on themselves.
gravenimage says
ploome wrote:
I know everyone will hate me
but who cares what they do to each other
……………………
I don’t hate you, ploome–I understand your frustration. But Muslims are *not* just doing this to each other, as I showed in my links.
In fact, Muslims are involved in an orgy of raping small boys (especially attacks at pools), little girls (look at the rape of a 5-year-old girl in Idaho), women (look at the mass molestation and rapes on New Year’s Eve in Cologne and other European cities), and even on grown men when they get the chance.
In Australia, Sydney has had an epidemic of Muslim rape gangs.
As long as the West allows Muslims to continue to flood in, there will be more and more Muslim rapes.
Carolyne says
Male Muslims will rape anything with an orifice. They rape women, children of either sex, donkeys, goats, camels etc. etc. In the case of goats, they must not eat the goat whom they have raped. They must sell it to another village to be eaten. Who said they have no morals? LOL
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Carolyn.
common sense says
ISIS and jihadists aside. “Containment” is the first best policy regarding refugees. I’d be happy to see our tax money set safe zones up in their own region.
A different family member notified the authorities 2 days later, what? I’m very surprised the boy’s Father did not at least try to detain the perp and call the police himself. I’d be knuckles, elbows, knees and joints locks all over the rapist weirdo. If deemed an assault it’s a crime of passion in self defense of the child.
gravenimage says
The “containment” should be back in Dar-al-Islam.
miriamrove says
In Afghanistan just about every man has kid that they rape. Women are only for reproductive reasons. Watch the movie The Kite Runner. m
Tired says
And we are welcoming this kind of behaviour all over our countries assuming they will behave according to our society norms. We are expecting our norms from people that have no clue of morality as we know. Good luck. I’m concerned for the children of our countries.
Dan says
“The boy’s dad stormed into the room and found Rahaman lying on top of his son who was face down on the bed with his pants around his knees.
He asked: ‘What are you doing to this little boy? You’re an adult.’
The paedophile denied doing anything to his son”
Yeah. I’m sure if any of us walked in on the same situation we say, “Oh! I believe you. Sorry, my mistake for barging in here.”
“Rahaman told the court he had been a victim of sexual abuse as a child before he moved to Australia.”
Hold the phone-y here. Didn’t he claim he didn’t know it’s wrong because is accepted behavior where he came from? Then he shouldn’t be claiming he was sexually abused as a kid. His argument would remain that he did not do any wrong.
He’s just parroting lawyer advice, (Probably a Muslim lawyer) to play victim.
You know when it comes right down to it, lawyers don’t have ethics that far different from Islamism. “As long as it promotes your side, go for it.”
We “lawyer up” when in trouble.
I wonder if “Taqquiya up” has the same meaning.
Frank Anderson says
I have some really considerable experience in this subject of lawyers and their duties: If you tell a lawyer about a completed crime or fraud, what you say is safe from disclosure with TWO exceptions, 1) you consent to the disclosure, for example by saying on the advice of my attorney . . ., or 2) you attack your lawyer by accusing him/her/it of inadequate representation or other ethical breaches.
When you consult a lawyer about planned or ongoing crime or fraud there is never any duty of confidentiality. On the contrary the lawyer is required, if you refuse to stop, to call “the affected person or tribunal” to inform them of your acts, whether planned or in motion. Otherwise the lawyer becomes a party to your crime. Under US Federal law he/she/it is equally guilty with you in whatever you do. 18 U.S.C, 2, see also e.g., 18 U.S.C. 371.
A lawyer’s duty of zealous advocacy of his client’s interest is limited by an equally solemn duty to uphold the law and the standards of professional conduct. Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986). A lawyer’s office is not a nest of vipers in which to hatch out frauds and perjuries. Gebhardt v. United Railways Co., 220 S.W. 67 (Mo. 1920). A client who consults an attorney in aid of a crime or fraud will have no help from the law; He must let the truth be told. Clark v. U.S. ____ U.S. ____ (____). The presence of crime or fraud waives privilege. In re Grand Jury, 640 F.2d 49 (7th Cir. 1980). Once privilege has been waived it cannot be reclaimed. U.S. v. Krasnov, 143 F.Supp. 184 (E.D.Pa. 1951), aff’d sub nom, U.S. v. Oppenheimer, 355 U.S. 5 (1957). By citing these cases and showing ongoing crime or fraud I have seen 4 lawyers ordered to the witness stand to testify against their clients. I have never seen another lawyer force opposing counsel in similar situations because of “professional courtesy”. These decisions are “good law” in the US but could at least be “persuasive” in Australia if a lawyer could be found to argue them.
In too many cases lawyers follow the old one “It ain’t illegal until the judge says so!” and feel empowered to say or do anything as long as they continue to collect their fees.
Dan says
Hi Frank,
I know what lawyers are SUPPOSED to do.
The problem is, nobody believes lawyers have any more integrity than a typical politician.
Which might be why so many lawyers end up in politics.
Several years ago, I was in a NASTY business dispute. I’d wanted out of the family biz. Owned 30% free and clear of all debt, but had just finally had enough.
The only offer I got, was F off. Learn to get along.
I said, “Look. (No swearing I swear.) This isn’t working. I’ll give you a year to figure something out, but I want out.”
A year later, I was told to F off again, and I simply walked away. I was fortunate/unfortunate, in that, after almost twenty years work, I’d had NO time to even think about starting a family, so I had nobody to worry about feeding but myself and, and FURIOUS as I was, the only thing that stopped me from suing was, the family patriarch might change his mind down the road but, if I get a lawyer, HALF any money I get’s gone, and more legal fees from the rest of the family, with whom I had no quarrel.
I figured I might die broke and staving, but ain’t no way no lawyer’s getting a penny.
A few years later the family offered a pay out.
I accepted no questions asked.
And the #$%^&*$#$% lawyers triple billed us just to transfer land an property titles.
$75,000.00 grand was the whole family bill, me paying my share, when there was no bickering, no complaining, no threats to sue, no court time, no nothing.
And we’re talking for a business that was only worth a bit under 2 million.
Lawyers, have earned they’re reputation.
Frank Anderson says
To my experience more or less 90 percent of lawyers are not people I would consider fitting the model set by THE LAW. That is why I learned how to beat them, in the process equipping other lawyers who will to expose the liars.
As far as the fee dispute, consult your Bar. IT looks to me like the majority shareholders negotiated an inflated fee in your absence to load you and diminish your distribution, while either paying their outstanding legal bill for other work, getting a rebate under the table, or paying for other future services. Their lawyer was not yours and should have advised you to obtain your own attorney. I think the bar would see a conflict of interest; and as a shareholder you may have a derivative action against your family and their attorney for breach of their fiduciary duty to you. Talking to your own, licensed and currently practicing attorney could be extremely enlightening. But make sure as best you can that he/she/it has substantial experience and success in heavy shareholder and corporation litigation. Just because a license is on the wall and in effect does not mean the lawyer is competent to advise you or handle the case. It is possible that a breach of fiduciary duty claim could return compensatory and punitive damages along with your attorney fees.
Many years ago I assisted a 49 percent shareholder against his 51 percent brother who lived like a king, while my brother lived like a pauper and did all the hot, hard construction work. The 51% forged the 49%’s signature on some guarantees and then bankrupted the company. By bankrupting the corporation the 49% became responsible for most of the corporate debts. It took 3 emergency hearings in 3 weeks to convince the judge that the 51% was lying in court and committing major frauds outside to bring the case down and protect the 49%. I believe you should be able to find an active, currently licensed attorney in your area if you will check around.
Guest says
If it were my child, he’d be dead.
somehistory says
If the thought it was ok, why did he sneak into the boy’s room? And why did he offer to pay money to the child? And why did he tell the father of the boy that he hadn’t done anything?
He knew it was wrong. Saying he thought it was okay because it is okay elsewhere, is a big fat load of garbage. A big fat lie.
But lies and rape and murder are what islam is all about.
miriamrove says
Yes. He knew exactly what he was doing. Muslims are so sex starved that they resort to anything. There is a video of US military surveillance on youtube catching a few men doing a goat in. M
Guest says
I will never accept any ‘sex starved’ excuse (I know you’re not making an excuse but some people do): everyone can DIY if desperate.
gravenimage says
I’ve never accepted that excuse, either. It’s even more absurd since he’d been living in the free West for at least three years.
Paul Clark says
This is just one of millions of incidents revealing how perverted and immoral the
followers of Islam are. A perverted religious life style that rewards perversion, lust and gluttony, murder, rape, etc.; forced down idiots throats by the sicko Muhammad and his past and present henchmen. Furthermore all those filthy books named the Quran should be incinerated, like the filthy, demented followers. These filthy Muslim pedophiles won’t be seeing “pearls” They will probably experience flames shooting up their pearly butts and not at the pearly gates.
Also I wonder if those idiots holding the signs are the pokers or pokees. Unbelievable idiots.
abel & solomon says
Mohammed was into under age sex too, the following is an excerpt from The Undoing:Islam by its own words, the amazing free e-book that’s turning heads in some very high places. Get your copy or read it online here;- http://abelandsolomon.simplesite.com/424568444 , for the bigger picture read our full length book Islamic Apocalypse;- https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01AS09LYW
A child bride
Mohammed took further wives after the death of his beloved Khadijah, the one we know most about is Aisha, who in her own words, married; “when I was six and we consummated the marriage when I was nine. I still used to play with dolls…” Indeed, the marriage might have been consummated earlier had it not been for the poor girl falling sick and losing all of her hair straight after the marriage. This marriage became a model for child marriages which is enshrined in Sharia Law. The United Nations and medical charities report that in Muslim countries some children die from these child marriages because their bodies are not yet ready for sex or childbearing.
A taste for killing
Mohammed’s biographies recount; “Then they (the Jews) surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina…the apostle went out to the market of Medina and dug trenches in it. The he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out in batches…There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.” “The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims.”
Sex-slaves
The keeping of women as captives was not a moral issue in early Islam. Hadiths record a discussion involving Mohammed about trying to preserve the resale value of sex slaves by not getting them pregnant; “(Al-Khudri) sitting with Allah’s Apostle asked, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?’ Mohammed traded sex-slaves; “the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins (and five others). The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.”
Poison!
At Khaybar, a captive named Zaynab, who, in revenge for what Mohammed had done to her people, plotted to prepare him a meal which she would poison, saying to herself, “if he was a true prophet he would not be tricked, but if he merely was a king he would eat and die”. “When the messenger of Allah rested from his labour, Zaynab bt. al-Harith, the wife of Sallam b. Mishkam (whom Muhammad had killed), served him a roast sheep. She had asked what part of the sheep the messenger of Allah liked best and was told that it was the foreleg. So she loaded that part with poison…” He took the poisoned meat and it was a long, slow and painful demise lasting over three years.
Trico (@tricolorro) says
“…he comes from a society where this is NORMAL behaviour”
Oh boy, you are not going to like this but don’t blame the Messenger.
I believe I posted part of this here once before but it seems like I need to post it again so hopefully you will realize there is much going on behind the scenes not only in the USA but in all Western Nations.
This time I added some Headlines.
–
Q&A:
Q. When is a Sexual Perversion NOT a Sexual Perversion?
A. When it’s reclassified as a Sexual Orientation.
“Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says not only is all hell breaking loose after the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage, but we’re on the fast track to legalizing “12 new perversions,” including pedophilia and bestiality.”
“We’ve already found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department,” DeLay said. “They’re now going to go after 12 new perversions, things like bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that legal.”
Source: http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/1394679/tom-delay-bestiality-pedophilia-department-of-justice
–
“Legalizing Sexual Child Abuse: Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation” Source: http://www.truthandaction.org/legalizing-sexual-child-abuse-pedophilia-now-classified-sexual-orientation/
–
In case you don’t know there exists a Global Pedophile Ring that encompasses Washington D.C. The British Crown and the Vatican.
It is truly Global in scope and has existed for a long time and includes many people you know in Government, Media, Hollywood, Entertainment, Business, Religion.
You don’t believe it?
Headlines:
“Massive Online Pedophile Ring Busted By Cops”
–
“Global pedophile ‘dark net’ bulletin board busted from Australia”
–
“Child Rapist In Global Pedophilia Ring Pleads guilty To Sexually Assaulting Toddlers And Babies”
–
“How Thatcher’s Government Covered Up a VIP Pedophile Ring” “Now that most of the major figures are dead, the truth is emerging about the systematic sexual abuse of children by members of the British government.”
-The Daily Beast
–
“British police smash global pedophile ring, arrest 700 people; 31 children rescued”
–
“Censored: Journalist Exposes Elite Pedophile Ring. Global sex trafficking ring brought to light by brave journalist”
-Alex Jones show
–
“Your Child Is Not Safe from the Global Elite’s Child Sex Trafficking Rings”
–
gravenimage says
Whatever your view of homosexuality, the idea that pedophilia is legal in the West is mistaken (or worse). It is only consensual same sex between consenting adults that is legal.
Tommy says
In America their was a judge who denied a restraining order for a muslim woman who was raped by her muslim husband. The devil husband said his defense was it was his religion!
marion mann says
since when is a crime not a crime if some pig claims religion as a defense.Also Ignorance of the law is not accepted as a defense, so why do” refugees” or should I say muslims, get a dispensation? The gov should not let these savages run loose without training . Why did the person who killed the abortion doctor for religious reasons receive the death penalty
Champ says
Well raping anyone *is* a CRIME you disgusting piece of filth!! So sick of these uncivilized evil savages and their lame-o excuses.
traci94 says
These people need to understand that what is “culturally acceptable” in their countries is morally repugnant in the civilized world, and I don’t give a flying flip that they don’t know that this is disgusting! When they do this kind of thing, like raping children, women, animals, whatever, there should be NO leniency! It’s unacceptable, period.
Goddess says
Enough with all this bs, use common sense, JUST SHOOT THE PERVERT.
steve brown says
Australians must revolt and form a military government or Australia will become a Sharia Law governed nation within 20 years. The muslims in Australia will have 40 children per man all living off of the Welfare system. Within one generation the Islamic population of Australia will increase to the point where the muslims seize control of the government.
Supasue says
we don’t have twenty years at the rate things are moving. The Muslim Muftis refused to recognise Australian Divorce Law rulings when an ABC documentry was made in early 2000s. It was run on SBS about 3 months ago and cancelled the divorces of two women from Muslim husbands until they paid the men an amount they specified as owed to the husband. Admittidly one of the women apparently helped men into the country by marrying them. The point of this whole documentry to me was the denial of our Australian laws.
Mazo says
The British sent millions of Bengali Rohingya from Chittagong in Bangladesh into Myanmar after the British invaded Myanmar and annexed it to British India.
The British intended to manufacture problems and tensions against the Buddhist Rakhines of Arakan.
The native peoples of Arakan are the Rakhine Buddhist and Kamein Muslims. They built the Kingdom of Mrauk U.
Bengali Rohingya are a British imported horde from Bamgladesh.
The King of Myanmar granted citizenship to some Chinese Hui Muslim (Panthay) immigrants in Burmese cities in the 19th century and they are productive citizens.
There have been no violence by Kamein and Panthay.
The violence is 100% between Bengali Rohingya and Rakhine.
Its a reminder to never trust the devious British and the west. The British will invade your country, dump millions of illegals onto your land and then blame you for it.
A justified response by Myanmar would be to send boatloads of Rohingya to Britain and former British colonies like Australia.
Maynmar is buying JF 17 fighters from Pakistan and has received submarine training from the Pakistani Navy. It has to prepare to defend itself from western attacks in the name of “humanitarian intervention” and Pakistan is helping out.
Cecilia Ellis says
Mazo, your comment is absurdly irrelevant. Instead, perhaps you could address a different issue . . . such as the topic of the posted article, which specifically reports the rape of a 10-year-old Muslim boy by a 20-year-old Muslim male. What do you think about this repulsive crime? Do you acknowledge the Quranic promise — made by Allah — of young boys, made such for eternity, for the sexual pleasure of devout Muslim men who permeate the Islamic paradise?
Jedothek says
Please see my comment elsewhere on this page on this “Quranic promise”
Cecilia Ellis says
Jedothek, please see Robert Spencer’s comment, which was provided as follows in his introduction to the posted article:
“Women are so devalued, men look to other men and boys for sexual pleasure. Also, the Qur’an promises not just virgins to the blessed, but boys like ‘scattered pearls’.”
Mazo says
Cite the text where SODOMY is allowed.
I see no mention of sex or sodomy.
Sodomy between males is expressly banned in Islam. In the Hadith and by all four Madhahib. Anal sodomy with women is banned in Islam too.
Cecilia Ellis says
Mazo, my first question to you was this:
“What do you think about this repulsive crime?”
Since you did not answer that question, but instead opted to divert the discussion to a general QuranIc ban on sex/sodomy between two males, I will ask my first question again, modified for your direct response:
What do you think about a 20-year-old Muslim male who rapes a 10-year-old boy and does so because it is not considered to be immoral, which would include his understanding of Islam?
That is the question you have not answered. The Qur’an does prohibit consensual sex between two males. That being said, I did not state that it did not. Indeed, I did not mention it. My question was about rape of a child, not consensual sex between two males. The rape of that child seems to be of no concern to you.
My second question to you was this:
“Do you acknowledge the Quranic promise — made by Allah — of young boys, made such for eternity, for the sexual pleasure of devout Muslim men who permeate the Islamic paradise?”
You, again, did not answer that question.
To honor your demand that I cite the text where sodomy is allowed, I provide the following:
“Eat and drink pleasantly for what you did, Reclining on thrones set in lines, and We will unite them to large-eyed beautiful ones. And (as for) those who believe and their offspring follow them in faith, We will unite with them their offspring and We will not diminish to them aught of their work; every man is responsible for what he shall have wrought. And We will aid them with fruit and flesh such as they desire. They shall pass therein from one to another a cup wherein there shall be nothing vain nor any sin. And round them shall go boys of theirs as if they were hidden pearls.” (Sura 52:19-24)
In short, Mazo, your reply is, like your original comment, irrelevant.
linnte says
Boom! Excellent response to Mazo. How in the world can Muslims read and reread their OWN vile Qur’an and simply not see what it says?
Mazo says
Sodomy between two males regardless of age or consensuality is absolutely prohibited in Islam according to Sunnah, Hadith and jurists of all four madhahib for both parties in the sodomy. Sodomy with women regardless of age is prohibited .
Mazo says
The cited text mentions people uniting with large eyed ones, not with the boys. Do you have dyslexia? The fruit and flesh refer to food. There is nothing in there which says sodomy is allowed with boys.
The perpetrator was a Rohingya which you are conveniently forgetting.
Frank Anderson says
Please tell us about the Christian boys kidnapped by the Turks to serve various duties, the Janissaries? Were they not abused as part of their training to humiliate and break them?
If this child abuse violates Islamic law, what sentence would be imposed? Maybe he should be sent to an Islamic court elsewhere after he completes his time in Australia. Under the concept of dual sovereignty that would not be “double jeopardy”.
Cecilia Ellis says
Mazo, at 4:04 a.m. on September 2, 2016 wrote: “The cited text mentions people uniting with large eyed ones, not with the boys. Do you have dyslexia? The fruit and flesh refer to food. There is nothing in there which says sodomy is allowed with boys.”
Mazo,
I have twice asked this specific question of you: “What do you think about this repulsive crime?” Twice you have failed to respond to that question. Once again, I ask you – not what the Quran states, but rather what you think – of this repulsive crime?
Now, I will answer your question: No, I am not dyslexic. The Quranic text I provided, Surah 52:19-24, does indeed address a gathering, a gathering in Islamic paradise. Nowhere did I state that “uniting with large eyed ones” meant boys. I did not mention that. Nor did I mention “fruit and flesh” as referring to anything. My focus was, instead, on the following: “And round them shall go boys of theirs as if they were hidden pearls.”
Here is a different translation, provided by Sahih International: “There will circulate among them [servant] boys [especially] for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.” (Surah 52:24)
A brilliant scholar, Robert Spencer, provides this commentary on the stated verse:
“The righteous will also be served in Paradise by beautiful boys (v. 24). The Tafsir al-Jalalayn elaborates: ‘And there will circulate from all around them, for service, youths, delicate [in demeanour], of their own, as if, in terms of their beauty and immaculateness, they were hidden pearls, preserved inside shells, because when it [a pearl] is inside it, it is better than one that is not.’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/09/blogging-the-quran-suras-49-the-chambers-50-qaf-51-the-winnowing-winds-and-52-the-mount
Should you prefer to ignore this commentary, consider this: The Islamic scholar, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Caliph Ibrahim of the Islamic State, referring to the same Quranic verse, tweeted the following fatwa, which is quoted directly from an article posted on Jihad Watch:
“’It is permissible for the mujahid [jihadi] to enjoy young boys in the absence of women.’
The purported fatwa then justifies this position by quoting Koran 52:24:
‘There will circulate among them [servant] boys [especially] for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.’
A similar verses (76:19) reads: ‘There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them [as beautiful as] scattered pearls.’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/06/it-is-permissible-for-the-mujahid-to-enjoy-young-boys-in-the-absence-of-women
Apparently, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who earned his Ph.D. in Islamic theology, is unaware that sodomy is at all times haram in Islam.
So, back to my initial concern: the topic of the posted article. A pre-pubescent boy was raped (sodomized) by a Muslim. That is the issue. I consider that sexual crime to be indefensible. Do you?
Frank Anderson says
Can anyone give meaning to the phrase “made eternal”? My imagination is not a substitute for better knowledge.
Cecilia Ellis says
Frank Anderson wrote: “Can anyone give meaning to the phrase ‘made eternal’?”
Frank, in this case, it means that the youth [young boys] will be youth eternally. They will always be young boys, not aging.
Frank Anderson says
Thank you.
gravenimage says
Cecilia, Mazo will *never* reply to your question.
Cecilia Ellis says
Graven, I concur with your assessment. Mazo will not reply to my question.
Cecilia Ellis says
Linnte, thank you so very much for your reply at 2:48 p.m. As to your question, “How in the world can Muslims read and reread their OWN vile Qur’an and simply not see what it says?”, there are probably many suggestions I might offer. None of them, however, would be sufficient. Apparently, willful blindness has been “made eternal”. ?
linnte says
?
Jedothek says
With regard to your quote from Mr. Spencer: I know what he says , but I am challenging him (or anyone else ) to show from the text of the Quran ( or some other competent source ) that the boys in question are sex partners.
Jedothek says
The above remark was addressed to Cecilia Ellis.
linnte says
I would suppose that because sodomy of boys is so prevalent in some Islamic countries, Like Pakistan, Afghanistan and others, and we frequently hear of “sexual emergencies” from Europe regarding Muslim men raping boys and girls, it is assumed that those pearly boys are for sex. Sex is so much bigger an issue in Islam, in fact, it is what your “Paradise” is all about! Eating, drinking and SEX. What ELSE would pearly boys be used for? Simple slaves? Oh that’s right! You will have SLAVES in Paradise too. And what are slaves but people who can be used in any way the man wants, including BOYS.
You see, whether your Qur’an condones or demonizes Sodomy, what we Westerners see in the behavior of Muslim men is what teaches US HOW you truly believe. We never hear a Muslim speak out against his fellow Muslim about such crimes. Never. Silence is acceptance, and your billlion fellow Muslims public silent disapproval is DEAFENING to us as approval.
gravenimage says
Jedothek wrote:
With regard to your quote from Mr. Spencer: I know what he says , but I am challenging him (or anyone else ) to show from the text of the Quran ( or some other competent source ) that the boys in question are sex partners.
………………………..
Qur’an 52:24:
There will circulate among them boys especially for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.
Qur’an 56:17:
There will circulate among them young boys made eternal
Qur’an 56:22-23
And for them are fair women with large, beautiful eyes,
The likenesses of pearls well-protected,
Qur’an 76:19
There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls.
…
Notice that the prepubescent boys are describe in *exactly* the same terms as are the Houris, who are obviously there in Paradise for sexual use by the “Martyrs”.
Then there are the Hadith:
“I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented by hell fire”
“He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hassan’s) shirt and kissed his little penis..”
“He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his little penis”
Moreover, the rape of little boys is rife in the Muslim world, and there have been increasing numbers of overt Muslim rape of young boys in Europe and the rest of the West with skyrocketing Muslim immigration.
Pretending this isn’t so does not change the facts.
Mazo says
Not one word refers to anal sodomy.
Anal sodomy is not even allowed with human women in Islam, cravenmirage. It says Houri don’t defecate so no sodomy can be done with them either. The Hadith mention what the people of Lot did (anal sodomy) and forbid it.
Mazo says
Oral sex is makruh in Islam.
gravenimage says
Notice that the foul Mazo has *no* criticism of his coreligionist raping this little boy. But why would he? This is perfectly Isamic.
Cecilia Ellis says
Exactly!
carol says
gravenimage
Would Shia and Sunni differ much in this regard? The Ayatollah Khomeini seemed to think all was well. His official statements in The Little Green Book have gems like these:
» Wine and all intoxicating beverages are impure, but opium and hashish are not.
» If a man sodomises the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.
» During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform ablutions.
That must be pretty official – these imams know what they’re talking about, right?
I came across an interesting post that claimscaptured IS fighters have tales to tell. Apparently FILMING has been done while they were being raped. It could be used for blackmail. The “rider” is not guilty of anything but the one being penetrated is guilty and the death penalty can be held over his head. Al-Zawahiri of “Black Flags” fame was a known rapist. I think there were tales in that book of a big market for child sex slaves in Pakistan.
carol says
Khomeini’s Little Green Book can supposedly be found here:
http://tulisanmurtad.blogspot.com/2010/11/khomeinis-book.html.
gravenimage says
The rape of little boys is rife among both Sunnis and Shia.
Robeaver says
No fair. The girls get it at 9. Can’t the UN do something about this inequality?? Or the sPcA?
Jedothek says
There is no reason to think that the boys in Surahs 56 and 76 are meant as sexual partners.
Frank Anderson says
I really suggest further reading and discussion with better informed scholars. True Believers have been enjoying the sexual company of boys for 1400 years.
Jedothek says
You apparently think that homosexual acts were unknown in Christian Europe.
Notice that if one listens to those who enjoy excoriating Islam, one is invited to believe that:
1. Homosexuality is deeply woven into and inextricable from Islamic culture ; and
2. Homosexuals are savagely persecuted in Islamic lands such as Iran.
It might be good to get one’s story straight.
quota raven says
To Jedothek, who sez “It might be good to get one’s story straight.”
Then again, it might be good to recognize that conflicting behaviors and doctrines exist in Islam as illustrated and substantiated by the very opposing doctrines you present. Don’t be a knucklehead.
Cheers!
quota raven
Jedothek says
To quota raven: My point was that the fact that homosexual acts have occurred in Islamic lands does not show that the boys in Surahs 56 and 76 are sexual objects.
Frank Anderson says
I believe it has been discussed recently, if not in this article, but possibly others in JW that voluntary acts between consenting adults are forbidden. But when the act is one of punishment, abuse, or other humiliation, it is permitted. There is certainly a Western idea that has no meaning in Islam-Age of Consent. How much consent do you think 9 year old Aisha was capable of giving to her rape by 50 or so year old Mo? Anything that Mo did, all followers may and should do. To really get sick, read Wafa Sultan, M.D. A God Who Hates. It is the most disturbing book I have ever read.
Like many principles of Islam, there are plenty of contradictions, exceptions and schizophrenic statements. This is all the more reason to learn more about it instead of trying to understand it from an infidel’s viewpoint based on ideas that have no connection with the teachings being followed by the True Believers..
gravenimage says
The vile Jedothek wrote:
You apparently think that homosexual acts were unknown in Christian Europe.
Notice that if one listens to those who enjoy excoriating Islam, one is invited to believe that:
1. Homosexuality is deeply woven into and inextricable from Islamic culture ; and
2. Homosexuals are savagely persecuted in Islamic lands such as Iran.
It might be good to get one’s story straight.
………………………
My God, how sick–the idea that we should either applaud Muslims slaughtering gay people or else wink at Muslims raping little boys.
Here in the civilized West there is such a thing as relations between consenting adults–these are legal; rape and pedophilia are not.
Is that so difficult to grasp? I suppose it is for a Muslim apologist…
Jedothek says
It is mysterious to me why gravenimage imagines that I defend persecution or paedophilia . My point is that those who hate Islam will throw at it any mud they can lay their hands on, whether the charges are consistent or not : in particular , one hears that Islam both promotes and opposes homosexual acts.
I acknowledge the moral difference between relations between consenting adults and rape.
gravenimage says
Jedothek wrote:
It is mysterious to me why gravenimage imagines that I defend persecution or paedophilia .
…………………………
Given that Jedothek characterized opposing these two horrors as an inability to “get one’s story straight”, this cannot be as “mysterious” to this meretricious apologist as he pretends.
More:
My point is that those who hate Islam will throw at it any mud they can lay their hands on
…………………………
What *absolute crap*. The idea that Anti-Jihadists irrationally hate Islam and them look for “mud” to sling at it is moral inversion; I hate that vile creed *because* it sacralizes such horrors as child rape and the murder of homosexuals.
More:
…whether the charges are consistent or not : in particular , one hears that Islam both promotes and opposes homosexual acts.
…………………………
This is not inconsistent at all. Islam condemns affectionate *consensual* same sex relations between adults; but not pedophilia and homosexual rape to humiliate the victim.
This would be like saying it is inconsistent for pious Muslims to enforce veiling *and* to allow for the rape of Infidel women–it is disgusting, but not inconsistent.
Yet more:
I acknowledge the moral difference between relations between consenting adults and rape.
…………………………
Well, that’s big of him…
davej says
if Islam was not hiding under the deceitful cloak of being a “religion” it would be outlawed and all it’s many criminals and perverts put in jail.
As it is they are getting away with rape, slavery and murder while proclaiming their right to ignore our laws and collect welfare.
We are idiots not to recognize this.
Frank Anderson says
With courtesy and respect: WE do recognize it and don’t like it. It’s the liars we let lead us who let it happen knowing full well they lie. Time to look to new leadership, starting within ourselves, last verse of Matthew.
davej says
Present company excepted, of course.
But the global campaign to legitimize this death cult being conducted by the Media and most Politicians, led by Obama and Pope Francis, is both disturbing and mysterious. As if they had lost their common sense completely, along with their will to survive.
The Assisted Suicide of the West..
quota raven says
to DaveJ – I experience frequently the spasms of disbelief and puzzlement you describe. Nothing happens for no reason, though, I keep telling myself. Then I find myself answering myself: Follow the money.
Which is, frankly, way above my pay grade and too complex for me to tackle with any confidence, but oil does spring to mind. I can appreciate that it has a pretty significant role in jihad of various kinds, globalism and the Saudis buying up everything and planting themselves in our bureaucracies and government while funding violent jihad and every other kind.
Cheers!
quota raven
quota raven says
Should have mentioned schools and institutes of higher education, bought and paid for with Saudi money. Look at Georgetown. chrs! qr
Frank Anderson says
I have no reasonable path to disagree; and every reason to agree. When confronted with an organizational denial cult, I found it necessary to “move on”. There is no sense in supporting people who “don’t get the message” when the message is all around US. One of the many great lessons of Patrick McGoohan’s Prisoner series is that in the final analysis (The Hated cliche’ “at the end of the day”) we are our own Number 1 with the right, duty and authority of dismissing any Number 2 who is harmful to us. As long as we accept the control of all the Number 2’s trying to send us to individual and cultural death, we will do what they want instead of what is best for us. How many Number 2’s do we tolerate in our lives? How many of them are on “our side”?
Qui Creva says
Obviously the father did not think that raping the boy was culturally acceptable, even though he was also a Rohingya Muslim. And why did the rapist offer the victim money, if he thought he was doing no wrong?
Since Rahaman apparently believes that his birth culture is superior to that of Australia, I suggest that the Australian authorities deport him back to Myanmar, where he can indulge his pedophilia without fear of arrest and with the blessing of his victims’ fathers.
abad says
Deport that “refugee” back to where he came from.
Muslims are not refugees, they are troublemakers – just as Islam causes trouble for the human race.
The western world needs to be purged of Islam once and for all.
Dom107 says
Yes many who come to the West come under the guise of asylum seekers or refugees but are only the garbage from these countries who gladly let them out.The UK in particular falls for this crap and even sets them up in flats and pays for college fees as well. I knew one who lived near me and who claimed to be studying to be a human rights lawyer (That really must have impressed the official idiots !!)This bloke lived like a pig and never got up before midday.When he left there was about 50 rubbish bags in his flat which he was too lazy to put out each week.
As the song goes “When will they ever learn” !!!!!
Frank Anderson says
Suggested answer: When they are taught; But who can teach them? People that stupid can learn very few ways. I’d rather not suggest any.
Remember the OLD lawyer joke: Every question is answered by a question. Or another: How do you tell a lawyer’s answer-Because it is absolutely correct and completely useless. Like most they are still true. Here is hope for a better day with far better answers to these outrages.
suness says
Muhammad was a pedophile so ALL Islamic males are potential pedophiles. It’s that simple. In Afghanistan there are chai boys. Men rape boys in Afghanistan on an hourly basis. Educate yourself and read the bio of Muhammad. He went from spiritual to political to military leader who used and abused women and children alike.
davej says
Personally, on the evidence, I’m not much of a God believer, but I sure recognize Evil when I see it. Satan is apparently alive and kicking in the form of the Mohammedans. What a curse upon humanity, yet this evil is so outrageous and deceitful that it has many hypnotized.
NOT a “clash of civilizations” – more like Barbarians at the Gates.
quota raven says
My Dear DAVEJ – Don’t you think they’ve already breached the gates, for goodness sake?!! Just look around yourself, wherever you are!
Cheers!
quota raven
davej says
The Barbarians arrived at the gates and we (our idiot PC leaders) ignored 1400 years of history and threw the gates wide open! Then handed out vouchers for food and housing to the savages so devoted to our destruction. Unbelievable but true.
Looking at the videos of rioting Muslims on European streets it appears to be “mass hysteria” coupled with low intellect and emotional and moral retardation. All thanks to this Satanic animal Mohammed (may his name go down in infamy).
gravenimage says
True.
Frank Anderson says
For 7 years, ages 15 to 22, I didn’t accept other’s beliefs just to fit. My honored and treasured Uncle, who served as my father-by-choice #2, was the only member of the family that did not go into shock and panic when I challenged them with questions. He said that I was asking the most important question of my life and that the answer I would find would be my own, and the “perfect” answer for me. After 7 year what I have taken ever since to be a miracle happened to show me a presence in my life. Now 40+ years later, I still seek better answers but am quite at peace with my understanding. There is everything right in making up your own mind. This is the basic freedom that offends every totalitarian ideology, including Islam. Keep asking.
gravenimage says
Australia: Muslim refugee rapes 10-year-old boy, says what he did is not a crime because it’s acceptable in his homeland
……………………………
This poor little child.
You often hear from Muslims that Bacha Bazi–“boy play”–is only found in Afghanistan, and that it is a tribal custom with nothing to do with Islam. We all know this is false–pedophilic rape of boys is *rife* in the Muslim world.
That pious Muslims regularly murder homosexuals involved in *consensual* relationships makes this all the sicker–rape and pedophilia are Halal; it is only relationships between consenting adults that is Haram.
And this rapist is a “refugee”–actually, the vulnerable need to be protected *from him*.
And he is *not* alone:
“Austria: Muslim migrant brutally rapes 10-year-old boy in Vienna pool”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/austria-muslim-migrant-brutally-rapes-10-year-old-boy-in-vienna-pool
“Germany: Muslim migrant sexually assaults 6-year-old boy in changing room”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/germany-muslim-migrant-sexually-assaults-6-year-old-boy-in-changing-room
There are many, many more cases. In Sweden, a police phalanx was driven out of a migrant center by angry Muslim “refugees” who didn’t want their rape object taken away from them–a young boy. Police had to call in reinforcements to rescue the victim.
God, I hate Islam.
Mazo says
Alcohol, cigarettes, theft and fake Halal food vending are rife among Muslims in Muslim countries.
Dumbass.
Does that mean they are permitted in Islam?
Meat eating on Fridays is rife among non practicing Catholics.
Pork eating is rife among non practicing Jews.
Champ says
“Mazo” is the DUMBASS who’s always defending the indefensible: islam.
Only a DUMBASS follows muhammad (perdition be upon him), the most notorious **criminal** that ever lived.
Frank Anderson says
Kosher is considered optional among Reform Jews. Many take the view that God created the food therefore it should be eaten. Conservatives and Orthodox are far more likely to follow the rules of Kosher, but worldwide they are a minority. Like most issues in Judaism,”There is a whole spectrum of opinion.” Would the world be a better, safer and more peaceful place if such tolerance of differences were more common?
gravenimage says
The repulsive Mazo’s implication that Muslims raping little boys are violating the tenets of Islam is entirely false. Muslims are promised prepubescent boys to abuse in “Paradise”, and the “Prophet” himself molested little boys as well as raping his child bride Aisha. This is perfectly Islamic, as Mazo knows full well.
Mazo says
Cravenmirage is a despicable liar.
The Hadith says both parties who commit sodomy violate Islam since they are following the people of Lut.
Nowhere does it say you are allowed to sodomize the boys in the Quran.
Frank Anderson says
Please consider a suggestion to get away from hate. It may reduce the power of reason in finding ways to oppose, resist and defeat an ideology that has survived “perfect, unchanged and unreformable” for 1400 years. Cold hard thinking will defeat this challenge to liberty that Western society has been seeking in many ways for how many hundreds/thousands of years? Hate is probably a distraction for us, and an excuse for those we oppose to attack and disregard us among the truly uninformed and undecided.
Those we oppose fear nothing more than thoughtful reason and analysis, because it is completely foreign to their non-thinking, “follow the teachings” deliberate ignorance. I can think of little or nothing that I know about these monsters that I like. But if I hate I lose the most dangerous weapon I have, my reason, and weaken my credibility. “A good name is to be preferred above great riches.”
gravenimage says
Frank, with all respect, I do not believe that hating evil is a weakness–nor that it renders one incapable of using reason. If we were speaking of *unreasoning* hate, that would be a different matter.
Do I hate Muslims raping small children? Yes, I do–and I do not consider this an unreasonable response.
Frank Anderson says
Are we following Bill Clinton’s famous question, “It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is,”? I certainly don’t “like” the actions we are discussing. But having had to deal with my own “hate” of corruption for decades, and having to do what Masons describe as “circumscribe and keep me in due bounds. . .” while fighting hate to keep myself on track to defeat the evil in our society, our hate gives our enemy an edge in the fight. The blind passionate hate that is quite understandable and justifiable in the ongoing conflict, is also a danger to the reason and thought that is essential to survival and eventual victory.
Sorry, but another WWII example. Hitler cancelled Operation Sea Lion because of an irrational ambivalence and delusion regarding GB. The losses he would have suffered by conducting the invasion would be paltry compared to the losses suffered in attacking the Soviet Union, or the losses GB and the US inflicted in their bombing of Germany. I might add that had the Luftwaffe concentrated on radar and other air defenses, air fields and airplane manufacturing plants, they could have obtained the air dominance they wanted. But how do you obtain air dominance by bombing cities? You don’t. How do you obtain victory over an enemy where thought is poison, by thinking every step of the way to victory, without the cataracts of hate.
Thank you always. I enjoy our exchanges.
gravenimage says
Frank Anderson wrote:
…our hate gives our enemy an edge in the fight. The blind passionate hate that is quite understandable and justifiable in the ongoing conflict, is also a danger to the reason and thought that is essential to survival and eventual victory.
……………………………….
Frank–with respect–I don’t believe that there is anything blind about hating the rape of children, and any creed that condones it. Nor do I believe that righteous indignation over evil gives our enemy an edge.
I think it is more often the problem that Infidels are apathetic or in denial over the hideous crimes of Islam.
Nor do I believe that one cannot be rational and angry at the same time. In fact, if we *don’t* consider the fruits of Islam morally wrong, we are not apt to oppose them in the first place.
More:
Sorry, but another WWII example
……………………………….
I think almost all Allied personnel hated Hitler and Fascism. This did not prevent rational thought in how to defeat them. Nor did it result in continued hatred of Germans, Italians, and Japanese once they stopped attacking us. The Marshall Plan proves that.
More:
How do you obtain victory over an enemy where thought is poison, by thinking every step of the way to victory, without the cataracts of hate.
……………………………….
Again, I do not believe that moral indignation makes rational thought impossible–I think, in fact, that it can be a spur to action.
More:
Thank you always. I enjoy our exchanges.
……………………………….
Same here, Frank. We will have to agree to disagree here.
Frank Anderson says
We are close enough in agreement that I would not want to burden the discussion. There are some responses that I could make that might give a clearer picture of my example. We certainly agree that this evil must be defeated, and are both seeking the ways to bring it about. Please accept that I have had to fight my own almost overwhelming hate in guiding a war against corruption that started in 1982. By learning over all that time to “subdue my passions. . .” I made increasingly better presentations that absolutely humiliated and exposed the corrupt for who they are. It was fun to do and even more fun that I shared it with others to continue. Sincere Best Wishes.
Kay says
“IIndignation grips me because of the wicked, who have forsaken Your law.”
I do agree that “infidels” are often in denial though. Even as I am already horrified by the atrocities of Islam that I am aware of, there is so much that is even more horrible and I cannot even bear to look.
Frank Anderson says
“There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.” This is not a fight that anyone can survive, much less win, if blind. “You shall know the truth; and the truth shall set you free.” “But first it will make you miserable.” Thomas Jefferson. The truth is making a lot of people miserable and needs to make a whole lot more so that something can be done.Sorry for bad news.
WESTPAC Spy says
An Australian court just may be gullible enough to buy the “culturally acceptable” argument from this Afghani child rapist. Yet, somehow, I doubt the same court would accept as a defense what is socially acceptable in Texas when it comes to child rape.
http://abcnews.go.com/us/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071
Short story short, there were and never will be any chargers .in Texas for beating a child rapist to death. I am feeling oppressed by the Australian legal justice system, which is not giving equal rights to Texas culture.
Peggy says
The court shouldn’t be allowed to accept culturally acceptable defence. What is acceptable in other countries has no bearing on what is acceptable here. Our laws should not bend to accommodate any other laws.
Prosecution needs to appeal any judgement which takes that silly excuse into account.
Frank Anderson says
I cannot cite the case, but about 10 years ago the United States Supreme Court considered foreign law in deciding a case that did not directly involve that authority under what is called “choice of law” rules. The Liberal dedicated judges who stand to become the unbreakable majority if the next election goes to their favor, will destroy and water down the stand-alone authority of the Constitution and prior decisions that are now considered binding by a doctrine called stare decisis, “stand by the decision”.We have much to fear from the coming election.
Pong says
“He then raped the boy, who arrived in Australia in 2013, while his father was in another room preparing lunch”. Those “authors” should be send to remedial English classes.
Johan Elzinga says
Great photograph with this article. A picture says more tha a 1000 words. Would any of the people carrying the banner now regret this? Or do the still think that they are not in danger, because they are lefties and never in danger, other than the rest of us?
stevo-k says
this is exactly the reason the native Buddhists of Myanmar are fighting off and expelling the recently arrived rohingya! yet the msm make it out as if the rohingya are unfairly persecuted!
harbidoll says
Adultery can get you killed but “raping” a male Isnt considered so.Its Much safer as long as you are not the “receiver” or enjoy it . That makes you gay which can get you killed. Kapish! Comprendi? Mayveena? Not knowing the rules can get you killed!
mortimer says
That’s what we’re trying to explain to Western elites: Islam follows a different set of rules … Sharia law, taqiyya, deception, stealth … deadly, draconian rules that will get Westerners killed…atheists and agnostics first.
George Bacon says
Islam is an evil and demonic ideology
Screeminmeeme says
Normative Islam produces fiends who prey on the innocent. There’s not one good reason why it shouldn’t be eradicated from the earth.
west_rhino says
Extraterritoriality was seen as wrong during gunboat diplomacy in China and it is still wrong. Lock him up with his new husband a 250 lb lifer thats in for buggery and murder
Vivarto says
Quick death penalty for child abuse.
Florida Jim says
Send this fool and everyone he knows back to the hellhole from which he came. Good people are never muslims when will everyone understand this/ They wait for some Imam to inspire the Jihad an d no one is safe. We must oust all muslims if the follow Islam PERIOD!
Ron says
Had I been the father of this child I would have made the rapist unrecognizable and surgically sterile.
These people are barely human, totally unfit to live among us.
Frank Anderson says
I have a hard time considering them human, considering their acts, and their “laws” that teach and encourage those acts. I believe there is a movement in history, as demonstrated by Christianity and Judaism, of self-analysis, reform and progress. There is no such movement, nor can there be in Islam. Islam started as barbaric not only to infidels but also to its adherents. And it has stayed that way for 1400 years. It is in its own eyes “final, perfect and unchangeable.”
sidney penny says
Every Myanmar Rohingya Muslim claims to be a refugee.,
How many will Australian take?
In reality, they are all Bangladeshis
“Muslim refugee, 20, who raped a boy, 10, in his Sydney home says what he did ‘is not a crime because it is acceptable in his homeland’
Mufiz Rahaman, 20, said he thought raping a 10-year-old boy was okay
The Myanmar refugee said it was culturally acceptable in his home land
The court heard Rahaman tried to offer the boy money and denied rape
Rahaman is a Rohingya Muslim – as was his young victim”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3767301/Muslim-refugee-20-raped-10-year-old-boy-bedroom-claimed-culturally-acceptable-sexually-assault-children-homeland.html#ixzz4J9ciaAXr
Mo says
How’s that multiculturalism working out for ya?
Mirren10 says
”Judge Andrew Scotting said Rahaman failed to understand his actions would ‘physically’ and ‘psychologically damage’ his young victim.”
No, he didn’t. He just didn’t give a damn. Totally islamic.
gravenimage says
Yes–that’s exactly the case, Mirren.
badcase says
Sam Harris used the phrase “Head-in-the-sand Liberals” in an Los Angeles Times article to describe liberals who are in denial and “despite abundant evidence to the contrary”, “continue to imagine that Muslim terrorism springs from economic despair, lack of education and American militarism”. He bemoaned that “being generally reasonable and tolerant of diversity, liberals should be especially sensitive to the dangers of religious literalism. But they aren’t ”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regressive_left
Michael Johnson says
Sick perverse freak that’s what this piece of dirt is