“We’ve made a judgment, based on a lot of research, that bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy actually serves the purpose of the radical Jihadists, and there’s a lot of evidence of that.”
In reality, there is no such research, and could not be: the idea that naming the enemy would play into the hands of the enemy is a dogma of the Washington establishment that is based on two untested and unproven assumptions. The first of these is that to call the jihadis “jihadis” would confer upon them a spurious legitimacy that would aid in their recruitment. But it is absurd to think that Muslims are looking to non-Muslim political leaders to tell them what Islam is and isn’t. The second is that to speak honestly about the motivating ideology of the enemy would alienate our Muslim allies. But there is no reason why that should be so either. To acknowledge that those who are fighting us are Islamic jihadis doesn’t mean that every Muslim is or must be on their side. There are innumerable examples from Muslim history of various factions of Muslims fighting against other factions. And the Muslim nations who are for various reasons opposed to the Islamic State and al-Qaeda know full well what Islam teaches; it isn’t as if they really don’t know how Islamic those groups are. If that knowledge hasn’t stopped them from opposing those groups now, public acknowledgment of what they are wouldn’t, either.
“He quoted ISIS spokespeople rooting for Donald Trump’s victory, because Trump has made Islam and Muslims part of his campaign. And basically, Matt Olsen argues, the Jihadists see this as a great gift. They are saying, ‘Oh, please, Allah, make Trump president of America.”
Here Clinton contradicts herself. “Oh, please, Allah”? Hasn’t she just engaged in “bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy”? Hasn’t she just admitted that they are Islamic, despite her repeated claims to the contrary?
And does the Islamic State really want Trump to win? Unlikely that they would prefer someone who says he will fight them strongly over someone who will continue the weak and ineffective half-measures that are being employed today.
“Watch: Clinton claims ISIS praying for a Trump victory,” Israel National News, September 8, 2016:
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton gave her first interview to an Israeli media outlet this election season, sitting down for an exclusive interview with Israel’s Channel 2 that is set to air Thursday evening.
Clinton ripped into Republican nominee Donald Trump during the interview, claiming that his campaign rhetoric had bolstered the ISIS terror group.
When asked by interviewer Yonit Levi whether she would, if elected president, she would pursue the war on ISIS differently than her predecessor and, specifically, if she would refer to the conflict as a “war on radical Islam” – noting that the Obama administration has shied away from referencing “radical Islam” – Clinton suggested use of such terminology could actually strengthen Islamic terror.
“We’ve made a judgment, based on a lot of research, that bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy actually serves the purpose of the radical Jihadists, and there’s a lot of evidence of that,” Clinton responded.
The former Secretary of State then added that Matt Olsen, the former chief of the National Counterterrorism Center, had written in a TIME article, published Thursday, that “ISIS supports Donald Trump”.
“He quoted ISIS spokespeople rooting for Donald Trump’s victory, because Trump has made Islam and Muslims part of his campaign. And basically, Matt Olsen argues, the Jihadists see this as a great gift. They are saying, ‘Oh, please, Allah, make Trump president of America.”
“I’m not interested in giving aid and comfort to their aid and comfort to their evil ambitions,” added Clinton. “I want to defeat them, I want to end their reign of terror. I don’t want them to feel as though they can be getting more recruits because of our politics.”
The former First Lady then turned to her own plan for confronting ISIS, saying she would “intensify what is already happening: our air campaign, more support on the ground to the Arab and Kurdish fighters.”…

Don McKellar says
AS IF the fiends of the Islamic State want Trump! If they would ever state any preference, it would be for Hillary who cleared they way for them in Libya with her bumbling short-sighted stupidity, and was completely ineffective as Secretary of State during her reign which resulted in nothing but their foundation, expansion and growth. But we’re never going to hear about their preferences: they would like to see both candidates dead and America under the caliphate. Nothing else is acceptable to them.
Jay Boo says
Do we dare argue with Hillary’s “Someone said” evidence and Left-wing MSM lackeys who approvingly nod their heads in unison like trained seals even before she finishes each sentence?
EYESOPEN says
Short answer Jay Boo: Yes!
Shane says
Of course she is lying – her mouth is moving. If electing Trump is all it takes to turn “moderate Muslims” into Jihadis, then were they really so moderate in the first place? I don’t think so! This is part of the thinking that we should never say anything negative about Islam, muslims, or Mo because then the muslims will riot, kill, and rape the infidels. Again, what does that say about muslims and Islam that it takes so little to set them off?
Mazo says
Herp derp.
Trump supported intervention in Libya.
https://buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com/video/2016/01/19/FromTheDeskOfDonaldTrump2-28-624×350.mp4
Lynette says
Don’t forget Hillary knows you know. She has a red phone direct to isis commanders. Takes her orders from them. Has got the lying and deceit down pat, still taking lessons on FGM for herself in the near future!!
Don McKellar says
Also, following Robert’s commentary line on this story — indeed, there is a very strong argument that can be made that actually TALKING about the philosophy in Islam and where they draw their inspiration from would be a GOOD move. After all, look where politicians refusing to speak about the unspeakable has gotten us so far! As Trump says, it is time for a real change because what politicians have done so far has been nothing but a disaster.
PRCS says
“After all, look where politicians refusing to speak about the unspeakable has gotten us so far!”
And that includes virtually EVERY politician–in particular–those who parrot nonsensical terms/phrases like “radical Islam”, “radical Islamic terrorism”, etc., instead of simply saying Islam (or better yet–written, Orthodox Islam).
dyh swami says
This woman will say anything for a vote…Her knowledge is limited, her opinions skewed, her honesty is missing…
Trump is not evil, he has never committed an act of treason, and he has no blood on his hands…Vote your conscience…
ElderlyZionist says
Our Turkish ‘friends’ and their Arab ‘friends’ are still shooting at and bombing our Kurdish ‘friends’ in Syria, Hil.The Obama administration’s policy in Syria is a fiasco, and you own that fiasco, Mme, Secretary of State. Four more years of this policy will ruin us.
Alien Republican says
And your Turkish “friends” are said to have 50+ nukes on their territory from their NATO brothers and denying visits of delegations from their german “friends” to their own troops stationed in Turkey.
Jay Boo says
What can you do?
When someone is as dirty as Hillary, a mere carwash and a WUDU scrub-brush just won’t do.
The MSM circle their wagons around Hillary and rant day and night inventing a meme that Trump is just as dirty too.
No one is as dirty as the traitor Hillary.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
So true Jay!
But really: There is truth in what Killary says. I mean tons of psycho muslims (redundant, I know) can’t wait to die, the better to bugger little boys for all eternity, right? So in that sense they might really love The Donald, who will most certainly grant them their wish.
But the muslims know who to love, and it’s Killary. I mean: She uttered the holy name of ALLAH! And not a peep out of CAIR and their nutcase pals. Whereas if Trump had done that…(!?).
eduardo odraude says
Since the pious ISIS Muslims believe, following the statements of Muhammad in canonical traditions, that women are inferior morally and in their intelligence, it seems likely that ISIS wants Hillary in power in the U.S. If she wins the election, enemies of the U.S. will test her mercilessly, especially if she does not signal in an unmistakable way early on that she should not be messed with. I am concerned that both presidential candidates spell a coming train wreck for the US. A question of picking the lesser of two evils — which is fairly typical in an election, at least if one is realistic about the candidates. Trump in some ways is very impressive, and yet his personality and style makes me very uneasy. His moral compass sometimes seems either missing or hard to comprehend. Hillary’s personality makes me somewhat less uneasy, but her policies and views too often seem profoundly misguided and ignorant. Her election will create or continue the vacuum of US power in the world, I suspect, which vacuum will create various dangers. On the other hand, Trump’s election would perhaps provoke tremendous anxiety in the world, and possible global instability because to many outside the US, he represents a sort of stereotype of the worst aspects of America — the side of America that can be materialistic to such an extent that it crosses the line into amorality or immorality — the aspect of America that can be utterly selfish and imperialistic. She on the other hand seems to represent a quasi-socialistic false solution to all that.
We may be in for a rough ride in the next four years, whoever is elected.
Lion of Judah's Cub says
Hillary is untrustworthy; the public evidence demonstrates she is guilty of obstruction of justice, lying under oath, breaching laws designed to protect the national security of the US, as well as its agents and military personnel. Her server was designed to hide her sale of state department favors to the highest foreign and domestic bidders, including Saudi Arabia. The middle east is on fire due to her incompetence and corruption. She failed her bar exam. She was fired for lying and planting evidence (breach of the constitution) when working for the Watergate investigation committee. She is not as intelligent as we are propagandized to believe. She will be a grave disaster for the US and the world if she becomes president.
linnte says
That is a very profound point Kathy! She did didn’t she, and not one peep from ANY Muslim. Whoa! That is so revealing about her relationship with American Muslims and CAIR. Wow!
linnte says
Her sole reason for saying that is to influence voters who are afraid of Islamic State.
concerned canadian says
Wow she is one twisted evil idiotic snooty condascending lying atrocious disgusting
gross demon of a woman.
I actually despise the people that vote and stick up for her.
VRWC member77 says
Perfect summation and description of this monster. The rapist enabler couldn’t obtain power without the support of her own vile enablers.
Jay Boo says
Hillary is trying to deflect attention away from the disaster they and the EU has created.
How has the OBO-Hillary (not-Islam) strategy been working?
You can’t make this stuff up with a strait face but they do.
San Bernardino massacre
—– ISIS inspired Muslim treated as workplace violence.
Orlando gay night club
—- ISIS inspired Muslim described as secret closet homosexual in love-hate with Hispanic Gays.
etc., etc., etc., —– ISIS inspired Muslim
Angemon says
Because, as we all know, when anyone wants to know anything about ISIS or islam, Trump is their go-to source… /sarc. off
If I had to guess, ISIS wants Trump to win because Trump said he would crush them. ISIS is clearly looking for a full-scale war with the West, and my guess is that they believe if Trump wins they’ll have it.
Jay Boo says
Hillary has to go after Trump — rather than tout her disaster as Secretary of State.
(Hillary-isms)
Can’t we just blame everything on a 15 minute film and assume that all the American people with be suckered in by the skillful liars of a complicit Leftist media? What difference does it make if Islamic ideology is rooted in subjugating and killing the non-Muslims.
eduardo odraude says
On the other hand, Hillary might bring millions of Muslims into this country each year. Trump of course proposes an end to immigration from nations with a terror problem (which means mainly Islamic nations) but one wonders whether his election would provoke such opposition and mobilization on the Left that under a President Trump even more Muslims would manage to get into the country than would have gotten in under President Hillary. The law of unintended consequences could mean that Hillary paradoxically is better for our cause than Trump, though Trump supports our cause and Hillary is against us!
Victor balest says
A very strong case can be made in favor of Hillary’s basic position that Radical Islam would love a Trump presidency. That would be the single greatest recruiting toll for these radical jihadists. trump is literally “off the rails”.
Jay Boo says
Hillary is off her rocker just like you.
“A very strong case”???
Where is your strong case?
You have clearly attended too many Extremist Left-Wing circle-jerk sessions where some left Wingnut will blurt out a general unsupportable pro-Hillary statement and everyone applauds in an attempt to make it pass as true.
Mazo says
The same far leftists like Jill Stein who are taking evey opportunity to attack and insult Clinton.
Retards should look up the definition of leftist.
Jay Boo says
Go you get paid to spin tour BS?
Jay Boo says
Do you get paid to spin your BS?
dyh swami says
Evidence Victor, evidence…Have you read Allah’s book?
gravenimage says
Victor balest wrote:
A very strong case can be made in favor of Hillary’s basic position that Radical Islam would love a Trump presidency. That would be the single greatest recruiting toll for these radical jihadists. trump is literally “off the rails”.
……………………..
If you have a “strong case” for this, then by all means make it.
The two articles cited claim that the problem with Trump is that he has dared to say that there should be a moratorium on Muslim immigration into the US until they can be properly vetted. Do you consider keeping Jihadists out of the West being “off the rails”?
If so, why do you consider the entry of more Jihadists into the West to be a salubrious thing?
PRCS says
Uh, Vic,
Please enlighten me.
How, in your opinion, does “radical Islam” differ from the Islam of Qur’an and Sunn’ah?
Lion of Judah's Cub says
ISIS would only say they want a Trump presidency in order to scare people into voting for Hillary. They want Hillary to win because she will assist them in completing their caliphate goals as she is in the pocket of the moslem brotherhood and Saudi Arabia.
Lion of Judah's Cub says
There has been more than one eye witness report among Kurds and other Iraqi soldiers that the US has been dropping weapons, ammo, food and supplies to known ISIS strongholds, reinforcing ISIS positions. Consider also the bizarre US rules of engagement.
Also was it not an interesting coincidence that $500 million of new US military equipment was abruptly abandoned by the Iraqi army after a straggling group of poorly armed ISIS fighters (approx. 8000 in total) marched into Mosul. Instead of firing at their enemy, the heavily equipped Iraq army turned tail and fled. How convenient. Thank you US government for the freebies (ISIS is saying).
dyh swami says
Hillary: Islamic State saying, “Oh, please, Allah, make Trump president of America”
How can she know this? Has she been in e mail contact with Abu Bajr B?
Mark Swan says
“They are saying, ‘Oh, please, Allah, make Trump president of America.”
“Here Clinton contradicts herself. “Oh, please, Allah”? Hasn’t she just engaged in “bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy”? Hasn’t she just admitted that they are Islamic, despite her repeated claims to the contrary?”
Mr. Spencer, here, plainly demonstrates, Mrs. Clinton knows Her argument, that Islam is not the enemy,
is false, thus Her claim here of what would bolster the ISIS terror group, is false, and that the defining
our enemy actually serves the purpose of radical Jihadists, is false.
Carolyne says
Maybe that’s what her husband prays.
mortimer says
Clinton is a typical appeaser. She believes that if you call the crocodile ‘a crocodile’, the animal will be aroused and less friendly!
Classical Islam is not a matter of opinion: Islam is highly codified. Islam’s doctrines are perfect, complete and eternal and no Muslim can change them.
We should be persuading Muslims to leave Islam because it is not supported by history, morality or logic.
Wellington says
Having paid attention to this woman for more than two decades now, I have come to the conclusion that besides being a “congenital liar” (the late William Safire’s description of Hillary Clinton back in 1996) and a crook, she just isn’t that bright. She is possessed of a mediocre intellect, unlike her husband who is quite intelligent but a moral cretin, and this helps to account in large part for her third great failing——-incompetency.
So, no matter what she says, it means very little to me because she is such a little person. That such a person could very well be the next President of the United States fills me with both disgust and dread. Vote Trump.
Mark Swan says
I agree she does seem to have only a mediocre intellect, perhaps practicing lies for so long, has
weakened her, even more.
Wellington says
Interesting point, Mark. Perhaps mendacity over time does contribute to the weakening of the mind. If so, Hillary is a sterling “candidate” for such an “accolade.”
Mark Swan says
This is an interesting election, looking forward to the debate between these two.
Redmond says
Do jihadists have a secret plan that the rest of the world doesn’t know? What possible advantage could they have for Trump being President? Hillary must explain how could this could this possibly result into an advantage for ISIS, otherwise it is just the craziest conspiracy theory I’ve ever heard.
eduardo odraude says
ISIS may indeed prefer Hillary. But a case can be made that they prefer Trump. Jihadists want to fight, they want war and battle. They want to be known as jihadists for Islam. Trump will give them that. What’s more, ISIS may think that Hillary, by her soft policy, toward Islam, will seduce Muslims into a greater degree of carelessness about Islam and “corrupting” Westernization. Trump, by his administration’s rejection of Islam, will provoke more Muslims to focus on and defend their Islamic identity, perhaps. Fewer Muslims will be seduced by the corrupting Westernization. Islam will be less likely to mingle with evil Western values. The true face of the West as the greatest enemy to Allah and Islam would be better revealed by Trump than by Clinton, so more Muslims would wake up to Islam.
I don’t say the above argument outweighs the counterarguments that could be made. But I do think there is an argument that can be made that ISIS wants Trump. Even if they do, it doesn’t follow that we must not want Trump. Even if ISIS does want Trump, ISIS may be mistaken in wanting him.
ECAW says
You might say that Trump is ISIS’s candidate, Clinton is the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate.
linnte says
Clinton is definitely CAIR’s candidate!
ECAW says
Yes, CAIR = Muslim Brotherhood.
It’s the short trimmed beards vs the long straggly ones. I prefer the long straggly ones. They are by far the less dangerous.
Richard Paulsen says
Churchill was exactly what the Nazis wanted? Not a good conclusion.
gravenimage says
Trump is no Churchill, alas–still, he does more to oppose Jihad than does the egregious Clinton. The idea–as you note–that what these creeps really want is someone who will robustly oppose them is ridiculous.
Richard Paulsen says
Agree.
Guest says
I hate her so much!
John A. Marre says
Have you ever seen a more evil-looking person?
ECAW says
“And does the Islamic State really want Trump to win? Unlikely that they would prefer someone who says he will fight them strongly over someone who will continue the weak and ineffective half-measures that are being employed today.”
Hillary’s smear of Trump is not to be taken seriously, of course, but I suspect she may be right by accident. Any rational enemy would be unlikely to want Trump as president, as Robert Spencer says. But ISIS are not rational. They have this crazy eschatology which requires them to trigger Armageddon at Dabiq in order to encourage Isa to come down and “break the cross”. Isn’t it quite possible that they would prefer a president who will give them a real fight?.
Wellington says
It’s possible, ECAW, but I’m sure you’ll agree that is no reason for desiring a weaker leader. So, I say, assuming you’re correct, let’s give ISIS what it wants.
ECAW says
Quite agree. Let’s give them what they want.
Steve Klein says
‘Hillary Clinton slams Donald Trump’s attacks on America’s generals in first press conference this year’
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-hits-donald-trump-attacks-america-generals-article-1.2783053
What she does not say is Obama has fired our fighting generals, opting for “yes men” who kiss his Islamic supremacist-loving derriere.
common sense says
Reporting from within ISIS occupied territory affirms that indeed ISIS and all jihadists want to fight the American military. Playing against a better player can make you a better player, I prefer annihilation of the enemy and then a mop up followed by a complete exit and containment.
In the long run of an Islamist’s views they really don’t care.
This is just the lefts latest stab at Trump and the picture of
Omar Mateens’s father sitting behind Hillary at a rally ought to jog the peoples memory.
Hillary Clinton is everything and more that we know her to be regardless of the obfuscation of MSM. Pure communist, pure anti-American spun off as what an American should be *progressive*. POS in my opinion.
The people who support her knowing full well what she is are hypocrites and liars. Congress is to soft to denounce anything as a whole its very sad. This whole situation should have been dispensed with last year at the outset of deleting confidential govt information that hid Hillary’s back stabbing deal making with foreign powers.
Wonder when the next bleach bit concussion reference will be? Probably the debates, she will push as far as she can go without admitting anything knowing that she has to be proven guilty.
elizabeth says
In reality, the more light thrown on the darkness of Islam, the more it will disappear.
ECAW says
We keep hoping and believing that. But the evidence so far isn’t really with us is it?
Jay Boo says
Democrat Party
US Flag — Burners
Jesus Christ — Haters
Peter says
That’s because Trump, unlike Clinton (whose husband couldn’t kill “innocent” civilians when he had amply opportunity to obliterate bin Laden), would exterminate them.
somehistory says
If she had one honest cell in her entire person, she would have to realize:
moslims are the only people…as a group or as individuals…who use the term *jihad* for an action they take.
moslims are the only people who call themselves or members of their religion, *jihadists.*
And islam is the only ideology…religion…or non religion…to refer to its members as moslim.
Non moslms, non jihadists, only use these terms *jihad* and *jihadist* when speaking or writing about the believers in islam.
There is no way around it. She is a lying fool, intent on helping islam, endorsing what the *devout* wish to happen to the rest of us.
somehistory says
What she said, maybe she has *inside information*…after all she has a direct channel…reminds me of Brier Rabbit begging his adversary not to throw him into the briar patch. That was exactly what he wished to be done, as that had been his home all of his life.
Thinking From First Principles says
The correct response is “Islam declares itself to be the enemy, without limit, of all that is not Islam. The Islamic jihad (war of conquest) has been waged non-stop, globally, for more than 1400 years and will continue until the criteria Muhammad declared is met – all religion is only for Allah and Muhammad is acknowledged as his prophet. This is the objective reality we face. Claiming that something we do could START a war with Islam is a FALSEHOOD – the war is already on, they are the ones that started it, and they are the ones that are playing to win.”
EYESOPEN says
Very well stated and absolutely true.
SuzyQ says
The Muslim “Allah” is fictional no-God, a figment of the deceased man, Mohammed’s, imagination.
eduardo odraude says
A figment, or perhaps a former angel who turned sociopathic and possessed Muhammad.
dyh swami says
Hillary on Qaddafi…’We came, we saw, he died’…and then she laughed…
Is that just lack of character or is it mental illness?
Mark Swan says
Could be both
linnte says
I have heard people say Trump is narcissistic. The determining factor in diagnosing narcissistic personality is compassion for others. Hillary’s statement is completely in line with that diagnosis.
shoehorn of africa says
‘Liar’ isn’t the first word that comes to mind when Hillary is mentioned; it’s ‘pathological’.
Defen0derofIsliam says
Three foreign policy men over to Trump to talk to him foreign policy all he want to know it he can use. H-bomb on IS as president they left stoch at how unfit Trump is to be president. Trump is totaly unfit to be president he doesn’t know how to run his hotels business.
gravenimage says
“Defen0derofIsliam”–who keeps finding new ways to misspell the name of his foul creed–wrote:
Three foreign policy men over (sic) to Trump to talk to him (SIC) foreign policy all he want (sic) to know it (sic) he can use. (sic) H-bomb on IS as president they left stoch (sic) at how unfit Trump is to be president. Trump is totaly (sic) unfit to be president he doesn’t know how to run his hotels (sic) business.
……………………………..
Which “foreign policy men” were these, exactly?
Perhaps the same as these unnamed spokesmen for ISIS in the article above?
Mark Swan says
That first line, tore me-up, thanks gravenimage, made me laugh.
It’s a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word. ~ Andrew Jackson
linnte says
Your moniker should read: defenderofislam. There now fix it! Haahahahahaha! And get a dictionary too. Or, better yet, just go back to your sand box and stay there.
Carolyne says
And stop flirting with your goat!
Champ says
Hillary is a pathological liar …
Champ says
And this video in dated December 27, 2015, so Hillary has told many more lies since then.
somehistory says
Champ,
I don’ t know if you like Simon and Garfunkel, but they made a song when together, “The Boxer.”
I have tried to count the number of times in the lyrics…without going to a site where the words are written, but when I play it…that Paul and Art say “lie”. It’s a lot.
hillary has lied, will lie, and tells many lies more than if I played that song all day. Nothing she says can be trusted. The video is but a sampling, as you said. Sickening.
Champ says
Somehistory,
Thank you for the recommendation, and I’m listening to “The Boxer” right now. Great song!
“Lie-la-lie …Lie-la-lie …Lie-la-lie …”
Ahaha!! …yep that’s Hillary! 😀
linnte says
It is absolutely incredible that people think she can be President.
dyh swami says
Champ…I don’t watch a lot of video’s, but I watched that one…She ain’t Snow White, is she? She seems to be more like ‘The Red Queen’ shouting at Trump…’Off with his head, I love executions in the morning’…Don’t worry, Donald is an expert at bobbing, weaving and dodging bullets…If he wasn’t, he wouldn’t be Trump…
Champ says
Glad you liked it, Duh_Swami!
common sense says
Thanks for the vid Champ! I save key videos like this to my phone to play for all the nut job Cali libs. I like the one of Comey directley contradicting Hillary about turning over all govt documents, having more than one server, the server not being protected and that there were indeed confidential emails. The lunatics here in CA still vote for her.
Champ says
You’re welcome, Common Sense!
“I save key videos like this to my phone to play for all the nut job Cali libs.”
Great idea!
dyh swami says
All these politico’a seem to think if they get rid of ISIS Al-Qaeda and a few other groups, jihad/terrorism will shut off…It hasn’t shut off in 1400 years…They don’t have to win all the battles as long as they win the war…ISIS or no ISIS, jihad will continue…Allah willing, and he always is…
gravenimage says
Hillary: Islamic State saying, “Oh, please, Allah, make Trump president of America”
…………………………….
Clinton is citing an article in Time by Matt Olsen. Olsen in turn is citing an article in Foreign Affairs by Mara Revkin and Muslim Ahmad Mhidi that claims that an unnamed ISIS spokesman wrote on the ISIS-affiliated Telegram channel, Nashir, “I ask Allah to deliver America to Trump.”
They also claim that “conversations with twelve current and former supporters of the group”–all unnamed–show that ISIS prefers Trump.
In the Time article, another unnamed ISIS supporter is supposed to have said, “the ‘facilitation’ of Trump’s arrival in the White House must be a priority for jihadists at any cost!!!”–this phrasing is *very* odd.
Odd–or perhaps *not* so odd–that these articles do not name a single ISIS spokesperson–not even by a nom de guerre–nor do they cite a single original internet appearance of any of these supposed statements.
And the basic idea is that Trump saying that we should have a moratorium on the influx of Muslims into our nation until they can be vetted for ‘radicalism’ so enrages ordinary Muslims that they turn to Jihad.
Were this the case–that “moderate” Muslims are so fragile and so apt to turn to Jihad, then wouldn’t this just *confirm* Trump’s concern about letting in more Mohammedans?
R Cole says
I was thinking both Putin AND ISIS – support Trump!!
The fact still remains – as with the last time she made these IS claims – where are the videos – where’s the proof!!
It’s the Benghazi attack caused by a Muhammad video claim, all over again. Never mind the video was made in protest by a persecuted Egyptian Copt, now living in the US. Rather than being concerned with sending troops in to rescue US personnel in Libya – her decision not to go in was based on whether or not the presence of US forces would offend the Libyan people’s Islamic sensibilities. The cover story was that it was all to do with Islamophobia.
Clearly she’s still in denial – claims, We didn’t lose anybody in Libya!! It was a success!
::
On 9-11 there was no ‘Islamophobia’ – we saw some buildings come down and found out some Islamic terrorists did it!!
Guest says
That’s what they say about you Clinton, not Trump. Just you wait I’ve seen the recent polls, and Trump has passed you. Our salvation is coming
Trump 2016
Champ says
“Just you wait I’ve seen the recent polls, and Trump has passed you.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Such great news!
GO TRUMP!
linnte says
I liked that video too. Shared it to Facebook. Trump HAS to win. But if he doesn’t I hear Poland IS ALLOWING non Muslims to migrate there! Hahahah!
Guest says
The debates are coming, Clinton. It’s time to put your money where your mouth is!
citycat says
All these views, for or against, are part of jihad, attention is focused on Islam, not on Hindus, Sikhs, Satanists, Christians, Pagans, Jews, etc.
Islam doesn’t give a flying who is president, or what is true false right wrong.
All the arguments, debates, deals, wars, attacks, lies, truths, all of it, are like pebbles before the relentless ebb and flow of Islam.
Something in the way? Islam goes round it.
The idea of time? What’s that?
The last day?
Does any Muslim give a flying how long away is the last day?
Heaven can wait while Islam plunders kills rapes steals, you name it, anything goes in the name of propagating Islam, if it’s flowing with creeping or ebbing with breeding, Islam is growing in numbers, relatively more to most of the rest of the world, i hear.
Some of these western leaders seem to think it’s all some sort of joke, which is very scary.
Art Wild says
What could be more obvious. Identifying ISLAM as the enemy instead of ISIS, (which kills more Muslims than anyone, and is considered an ENEMY of Islam) gives legitimacy to ISIS claims that the west wants to destroy ISLAM, not just ISIS and terrorists. Unless you all really do want to kill every Muslim? Is ISIS correct? Do we really want to destroy the religion of Islam and all Muslims? Trump absolutely fuels hatred of the religion of Islam, and therefore plays into the hands of those using apparent US hatred of all Muslims as fuel to stir up hatred against America.
ECAW says
You are confusing Islam with Muslims. I wish to see Islam destroyed as an ideology or it will destroy us as it has destroyed everything good it bumped into over the last 1400 years. I do not wish to destroy Muslims. There are no doubt many decent Muslims who don’t take the murderous instructions of Islamic scriptures too seriously but where are they in the fight against those who do? MIA as you can see from the relative turnouts for protests against cartoons (thousands) and protests against ISIS (a dozen Muslims, a couple of vicars and the odd SJW).
Richard Ashton says
I really hope you guys in the USA vote Trump. This woman is not only unbelievably stupid she’s dangerous. We have enough idiots here with our very Mrs May plus the ideologues on the continent.
Daniel Triplett says
Just another lie from Hillary.
The Orlando Pulse Club Shooter’s Dad was behind her in the background gallery of one of her speeches cheering for her, and when interviewed, said he was “praying to Allah for Hillary Clinton to win.”
The people in that background gallery are intentionally hand-picked.
She will be a great gift to Islam if she wins.
west_rhino says
But what is one more lie to “Her” tally? Is not a mohammedan tactic to lie to infidels if it gains you an advantage?
Daniel Triplett says
Knowledge alone, and “shining the light on the lies” is an indispensable element in this war, but it won’t bring victory by itself.
Let’s suppose we convince every Kaffir tomorrow that Islam is evil, and this clash of two civilizations is a zero-sum conflict with only one winner.
Then what?
None of us is going to “talk” the Muslims into apostasy. They don’t fear and respect us, they believe WE are the evil ones, and they know they’re winning this war.
Remember Imperial Japan and the Third Reich? We face a much larger, more dishonorable enemy, with no uniforms, and no front lines. An enemy who lives among us, as trained liars, convincing the useful idiots among us they’re our friends. All we had to do with Japan and Germany is flip about five leaders each, and we win. And we had to fight and sacrifice hard for years to flip those 10 leaders. But that’s not going to work with the Muslims. They follow two leaders, Allah and Muhammad. One is fictional. The other is dead.
Reconciling this conflict will require violence on a Biblical scale. Let’s face it. We must begin with an overwhelming show of force to earn their fear and respect.
And guess what, we don’t have the military, money, time, or the will to invade and occupy 57 Muslim countries indefinitely.
That leaves nuclear weapons as our only option. Let’s get used to it, and develop the stomach and will to use them, and soon. Or, we could be stupid about it and wait for Muslims to glass Tel Aviv, Manhattan, or DC first, which they promise us they’ll do.
Objective: Worldwide criminalization of Islam, making its practice or promotion a capital offense.
One strike every three days on a random Dar al-Islam target until the Muslims surrender to our terms.
This worked for our grandfathers. It will work for us too.
fedupAmerican says
facing reality is always better than denying it.
Norger says
This is more “what ISIS really really wants (no sh*t, I am talking about what ISIS REALLY wants) nonsense. And of course our leaders have shown such outstanding insight into the ISIS mindset, who are we to doubt them?
Norger says
To paraphrase Daniel Greenfield, you might think ISIS wants to kill you, but what they REALLY want is a Trump victory in November. That’s EXACTLY what ISIS wants, Hillary knows this.
Just Thinking says
I am pretty sure the extensive research was from studies conducted by CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Crusades Were Right! says
Perhaps Islamic State are praying to Allah to make Trump president because they know he will send them to Islamic heaven PDQ!