“You’re far more likely to die in a traffic accident than in a terrorist attack in Ohio. But a recent poll shows terrorism ranks among the top four concerns for Ohioans, while car accidents received no mention.”
I would conclude that this had to be a bad joke, but the publication is actually serious about comparing terrorism to car accidents, and this piece was written on 9/11. There are a couple differences at least that should scare your socks off: first, a car accident is one thing, but the threat of random murders at any time, any place – the more gruesome the better and the more people the better – are another; second, there is a civilizational jihad underway against all Western interests, and infiltration has already taken place into the highest levels of the American government, so voters who are prioritizing terrorism as an issue are hardly clamoring for four more years of a failed administration.
How dare this writer trivialize the memory of 9/11, a day chosen for its significance by jihadists to assault the infidel. It also just happened to be the day that “Christian armies led by Jan III Sobieski, the King of Poland, arrived at the Gates of Vienna” and stopped the second Islamic siege on Vienna, when jihadi marauders had been expected to continue their violent conquest of Europe.
How dare this writer also dismiss the trauma of families who lost loved ones to jihad terrorism as too insignificant in number to be seriously concerned about during an election issue. This terror goes beyond the American continent. Those traumatized include the parents who are scarred over the loss of their children after they were mown down by a 19-ton truck in Nice, and the loved ones of the one million girls who were violated and brutalized by Muslim rape gangs in the UK. The number of people affected by the jihadi crimes sweeping Europe is incalculable, as is the number of Christians who suffer persecution globally under Sharia law. Then there are the millions of Muslims murdered by fellow Muslims for not being Muslim enough, the heinous atrocities committed against gays and women globally at the hands of jihadists, etc. etc.
The Western lives on 9/11 and beyond that were snuffed out by jihad were maliciously and violently taken by jihadis on a mission to strike terror into freedom-loving Western infidels, with the goal of expanding territory and conquering the free world.
Somehow I don’t think that Americans need to wait and see the stats on terrorist attacks climb to match those of car accidents to prove this outrageous numbers argument wrong. How could someone in his right mind state: “A recent poll shows terrorism ranks among the top four concerns for Ohioans, while car accidents received no mention,” as if there were something wrong with this?
The message delivered in the article below is not only beyond embarrassment; it is dangerous propaganda.
“Ohio Voters Measure the Presidential Candidates by Their Response to Terrorism”, by Robert Wang, the Canton Repository, via WKSU Ohio, September 11, 2016:
You’re far more likely to die in a traffic accident than in a terrorist attack in Ohio. But arecent poll shows terrorism ranks among the top four concerns for Ohioans, while car accidents received no mention.
Fifteen years after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, terrorism still shapes how people think and view the two major candidates for president.
What’s their basis? What are the numbers?
On average, since 1995, 153 people have died on U.S. soil each year due to terrorism, which is defined as criminal acts designed to sway or persuade opinion or actions. That includes the 2001 attacks that claimed nearly 3,000 in one day. Minus that one day, the average is about a dozen deaths a year over two decades.In Ohio in the last 45 years combined, six people have been killed by terror attacks, and all of those were before 1986.
In contrast, 752 people died last year in Ohio alone as a result of traffic accidents. Far more people die of poisonings, falls and weather disasters than terrorism.
The polling in Ohio took place in August, after attacks in France and Orlando captured the public. In response to an open-ended question about their issue of greatest concern, about 4.9 percent of respondents listed terrorism or the Islamic State as the top problem — fourth among a long list of issues — and another 4.2 percent named national security/defense, ranking sixth. Poverty/economic inequality was the top problem among those polled, at 10.9 percent.
Those most likely to be concerned about terrorism were women far more than men, Generation X, which is most likely to be in the family-rearing stage, and Republicans.
And the August poll showed that while Ohio residents still place a high priority on economic issues, terrorism and related immigration issues play an important role in defining their support or dislike for presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
The Bliss Institute for Applied Politics at the University of Akron designed the survey as part of the @YourVoteOhio project, an effort by major Ohio news organizations to determine what issues Ohio voters consider the most important and their reasons for backing a particular candidate. The Center for Marketing Opinion and Research in Akron conducted a phone survey of 1,079 Ohioans in August after surveying them in April and May. The margin of error was 3 percent….
Still, though, the fear of terrorism has affected Americans.
A Pew Research Center poll conducted in August shows that 40 percent of Americans believe there is a greater chance of a major attack today than at the time of the 9-11 attacks – the highest percentage in 14 years. Republicans are entirely responsible for the growth, according to the poll, with 58 percent concerned about the chances of an attack.
And in Ohio, it is terrorism, national security and related immigration issues that define Donald Trump, according to the poll done for the state’s news organizations. Those who like him are highly likely to name one of those reasons as their cause for support. Not so for Clinton, whose issue-strengths are spread across multiple topics……….

Richard Paulsen says
Inviting the devil to your table.
Xero_G says
There were several traffic fatalities in my community over the weekend so I’m joining my neighbors in a refugee stampede to escape this senseless slaughter. We’re hoping to find a welcoming country (Canada?) where we can stay until the mechanized transportation industry is defeated.
El Cid says
Sarcasm aside, the problem is just as bad in Canada.
The answer lies in Saudi Arabia where they already restrict 50 percent of the population from driving.
You see, Sharia is the answer to everything! (sarcasm intended)
gravenimage says
By the way, the worst places in the world for traffic fatalities per capita is–you guessed it–the Muslim world.
KrazyKafir says
I wonder how many moron columnists compared auto accidents to the Nazis in ww2?
Alien Republican says
The exact same “argument” time and again in german language media. The ultimate relativism would be to say that all people are bound to die, so why being overly concerned about the Holocaust and the next genocide ?
gravenimage says
Exactly. Such madness.
Shane says
These left wing loons go over the edge when it comes to defending their muslim allies. Yes, let’s not worry about Islamic terrorism because we are more likely to die in a car accident. Lunacy! We can do things to minimize Islamic terrorism as a nation by cutting muslim immigration, defining the enemy and giving extra scrutiny to mosques, and by deporting muslim troublemakers. Islamic terrorism is on the rise and our policies are encouraging it. Shillary will be just like the feckless Obama when it comes to Islamic terrorism while Trump will take stronger measures to defeat ISIS and diminish the threat.
don vito says
Cars are not taught to kill kufr, there is no car paradise, cars don’t threaten their family members with honor killings, cars don’t worship alla. Cars don’t believer that mo is the perfect man, cars don’t believe civilization jihad, cars never wrote a book about how to kill the kufr, take slaves, rape kufr women and children, etc…. must I go on?
islam_macht_frei says
I wonder if he would be so dismissive about a Klan lynching?
Allan says
Certainly not, and you can bet your car that he wouldn’t compare the number of lynched people this year to the number of people killed in traffic accidents.
Buraq says
Clown! You’re far more likely to die when you hear someone yelling “Allahu Akbar” than “Merry Christmas!”
Oliver says
That would, I think, depend upon where you are. In Istanbul; Baghdad ( or any other part of Iraq), Aleppo (or any other part of Syria); Algeria; etc. You would probably be wrong.
In most of the US (so, far; thankfully) you would be correct
davej says
Absurd and mendacious. Cars do not share a common ideology to kill you unless you convert to being a car. Cars do not think that a wreck or accident is a form of worship of Allah. Cars are inanimate objects that are subject to our control (or lack of same). What a ridiculous argument!
August West says
This same absurd probabilistic argument was made by Obama in a March 10 2016 interview in The Atlantic. This is a good article in that it gives some insights into Obama’s thought processes as they pertain to terrorism.
In this article you will find this gem:
Obama “…frequently reminds his staff that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do.”
It is clear to me that The Left has come to the conclusion that a permanently increased risk of terrorism is a negative but acceptable outcome of globalization.
This columnist seems to be just parroting this notion.
To be honest I don’t really even think that The Left views Islamic Terrorism negatively. To recall the famous quote “I need some muscle”, I honestly think they view Islamic Terrorism as a sort of de facto allied military force which advances The Left’s agenda. As long as the end justifies the means the don’t seem to care what the Islamic ideology has in store for them.
Allan says
No car ever intimidated its driver by threatening a traffic accident if the driver refused to practice the car’s religion, to pay jizyah to the car, and so on.
It’s relevant also that…
RAB says
So a fatal Islamic terrorist attack is no different from a traffic accident death! I’m surprised Mr. Wong even knew how to write in the first place.
miriamrove says
Mr Wong: How low can you get? M
Art says
Terrorism is a deliberate act. Automobile accidents are exactly what the word implies, an accident. If the so called reporter/columnist would do a bit of research and not be so flippant about it.
Guy Macher says
Car accidents and poisonings do not jeopardize civilizaton.
duh swami says
Cars kill a lot of people, but they never shout Allahu Akbar while doing it…
Ciudadano says
Forget about terrorism. Let’s invest all intel and police resources in preventing car accidents. How stupid!
People are more concerned about terrorism than car accidents for many reasons. First car accidents are preventable and people have some control. People can take safety measures and precautions to avoid that kind of accident.
Second. Terrorist attacks are unpredictable and usually cause many casualties. Terrorist attacks are intentional and try too inflict the greatest damage. Terrorist attacks in other countries concerns people all over the world. Terrorist methods are unpredictable: planes, shootings, lorries, bombs, etc. You don’t know if the next attack will kill 2 people or 3 thousand.
Third. This guy isn’t even considering foiled terrorist attacks. Almost every day there is a new terrorist attack foiled by the police. And those are the ones we know. Who knows how many more are stopped without any publicity. Those foiled terror attacks also make people to be concerned.
I wonder if this guy would dare to explain his theory to any persona who has lost some one in a terrorist attack.
Angemon says
Yes – it’s not the first media outlet making that inane comparison and it probably won’t be he last either.
gravenimage says
Yes–I’ve seen this stupidity before.
“10 Things More Likely to Kill You than Islamic Terror”
http://theantimedia.org/10-things-more-likely-to-kill-you-than-islamic-terror/
“Calm Down … You Are Much More Likely to Be Killed By Boring, Mundane Things than Terrorism”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-terrorism-statistics-every-american-needs-to-hear/5382818
I wonder if Yezidis and Christians in the Islamic State are more likely to die from car accidents or falls in the bathtub than being murdered by Mohammedans? Somehow I rather doubt it…
Mo says
The sad part is that fools like this so called “journalist” actually believe this nonsense. They’re so insane that they’ve talked themselves into it.
DHazard says
Actually more people die from being born than Jihad terrorism. Being born is the leading cause of death.
duh swami says
You have been dying the second you were ‘conceived’, due to aging and entropy…
Peter says
Car accidents (and other hazards of normal life) do not, as does jihad, which is designed for this, destroy “systems of belief,” civilizations, man-made legal systems, entire cultures, and entire ways of life. Jihad is an existential threat to all non-Muslim societies and civilizations.
Wellington says
Car accidents are almost never rooted in evil (unless perhaps a Muslim is at the wheel), but rather in extreme carelessness, stupidity, or just bad luck, while Islamic terrorism has malevolence written all over it.
It’s the “evil thing” that is most bothersome and not the sheer statistics since carelessness, individual stupidity or bad luck are not a threat to a society overall, but organized evil is and there has been no finer example in all of man’s history over a longer period of time than the organized evil of Islam..
Fitting that a modern journalist wouldn’t get any of this since modern journalism gets almost nothing nowadays. In other words, modern journalism in the West is an unwitting (well, maybe “witting” sometimes) ally of the oldest evil still, quite unfortunately, posing as something respectable.
JayT says
Typical statistic manipulation to get the end result you want. Question: Do car accidents plan, and obtain firearms and/or explosives, and seek out their targets? See how skewed the comparison is?
It’s the same kind of nutty argument made about shark attacks and lightning strikes. One can smell a drop of blood in the water and seek you out from hundreds of yards away, the other isn’t sentient and looking to target you.
rlm says
Actually, There was a study done in the early 1930s about Napoleon vs the Automobile. It detailed deaths by car accident versus death deaths during the Napoleonic Wars. There were more deaths by automobile.
The key is auto accidents are Accidents. Intentional killing are by definition intentional. People will always be worried about other people committing intentional acts versus random acts happening. As well they should be.
خَليفة says
They conveniently don’t consider being killed by a terrorist driving an automobile.
Gen Jones says
The insulting part about this attitude is the author thinking that we are concerned only with our own safety. A friend suggested the same idea, the odds of me personally being harmed in a terrorist attack are so low, there’s more important things to worry about. But I’m not worried about myself only, but about the innocent people in my city, my country and actually anywhere in the world where people going about their everyday activities can just be blown to smithereens. I have the moral indignation that any free person feels when any totalitarian ideology justifies slaughter. People who are paying attention are angry about the threat to freedom that Islam represents, not merely afraid of saving their own skin so they can live in submission.
Oliver says
Gen Jones-one could also tell your friend that the odds of one being struck by lightning is low.
Tell that to the parents of some teens, killed by lightning last month. On vacation from school- never to return.
BUT THE ODDS ARE LOW.
Nothing personal, in my opinion, your friend is a jerk.
Guy Jones says
The frequency with which the Left continues to bring up this transparently infantile, idiotic, and fallacious comparison, using cherry-picked, inapposite statistics, is mind-boggling. Obama perpetuated the trend when he remarked — true to imbecilic, lecturing form — that Americans were more likely to die from a bathtub slip and fall, than, as a result of a terrorist attack.
What is the end-game here, though? This is part of a persistent and contemptible campaign by the Left and other Islamic sympathizers, enablers and excusers of Islamic pathologies and barbarism, to trivialize and to minimize the threat of Islamic terrorism and to sow a narrative that portrays terrorism as an unavoidable, inevitable part of modern life, an inconvenience similar to traffic, bad weather and taxes.
The myopia and delusion on display here is astounding. The Left believes that a person cannot simultaneously want to minimize traffic accidents, cancer deaths and accidental household deaths, AND, hold a similar desire to destroy the jihadist threat. In other words, the Left would have us believe that to be concerned about terrorism somehow saps a person’s ability to want to eliminate other dangers encompassed within daily living. But, no one can deny that Islamic terrorism has increased in frequency and in deadliness since the 9/11 attacks. Islam remains an existential threat to secular democracies, individual liberties, religious pluralism and equal rights. But, the Left would have us believe that we should be more worried about car accidents. They are a bunch of infantile and delusional fools; what else is new?
خَليفة says
It is possible that the columnist and the editor are complete idiots, and think the readers will believe anything. (After all we must be superior since we are the ines writing…) Maybe they didn’t have anything better to print ( like when you wait until the night before an assignment is due and cram something out, then figure a D is better than an F so turning in anything is better than not turning something in )
Conspiracy and incompetence can look very much alike from the outside.
The apathy in so many people/students promotes this low-grade journalism.
JS says
That’s what you got if you ask a tech guy writes a political opinion… (oops!)
gravenimage says
Ohio columnist compares jihad terrorism to car accidents
……………………………
This sort of thing always makes me so angry.
Firstly, it assumes that something that is pure accident is the same as deliberate evil. It *is not*.
Secondly, it assumes that something like Jihad terrorism is stable, as, statistically speaking, car accidents are. But it is not.
Falling off ladders was more a cause of Jewish deaths than Nazi violence in mid-century Europe–*until it wasn’t*. Likewise, fifteen years ago any kind of terrorism, including Jihad terrorism, was extremely unusual. Now it isn’t–and less so all the time.
And if we look at Europe, this is even less the case.
Then, it grotesquely assumes that Ohioans are only concerned about what happens in Ohio–this is, of course, false. There *are* targets in Ohio itself–especially Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati–but Ohioans are Americans, and most are also concerned about what happens in higher-target areas like New York City and Washington, DC.
Moreover, the idea of danger occurring in only high-profile areas is less and less the case. Who would have thought that either Orlando, Florida, or San Bernardino, California, would be targets for Jihadists?
And while my knowledge of geography is quite good, I have found more and more that targets in Europe are apt not just to be in Paris, London, or Brussels, but in small towns I have in many cases not even heard of. The same could easily happen in Ohio.
Karen says
Graven, I love your ladder analogy. I image, using Wang’s statistical techniques, that if we throw out the 6,000,000 Jews murdered during the holocaust, (you know, that one anomaly), we might nearly eliminate anti-Semitism.
cara says
I just want to ram those teeth right down his throat . is that a bad thing ?
STJOHNOFGRAFTON says
Dhimmi of the Month award for this galoot!
Mark A says
When my car starts quoting the Koran as justification for wanting to kill me, joins with other like minded cars in coordinated attacks on drivers and pedestrians and wants sharia law imposed on me and everyone else who is not a car or car supporter so that cars can dominate the world, then I’ll perhaps give some credence to the idea of cars being a bigger theat than jihadists.
gravenimage says
Here’s an even more salient point: cars–and bathtubs, and eating–serve a benignant purpose. Most of the time they get you, your friends, and your stuff where they need to go; they aid in getting you clean and maintaining your hygiene; it gets you fed and nourished. The fact that they can all be dangerous is outweighed in almost every case by their positive uses.
Add to that that one can in most cases take measures that make all of these activities safer–proper automobile maintenance, driving under the speed limit and while sober, using grips or safety mats if helpful, eating slowly and chewing thoroughly, etc.
What about Jihad terror? Unless you are a Muslim intent on imposing Shari’ah law on the filthy Infidels, it *has no purpose*. Certainly, it has no positive or useful aspects.
We drive–or bathe, or eat–because it is in almost all cases *good for us*. What good, precisely, does the witless Robert Wang see in Jihad terrorism?
Oliver says
In answer to your last sentence.
Population control?
Although, i would start with Robert wang and his family, quoting a Texas politician about another Texas politician-“one imbecile in a family is enough”. (I forgot the politicians involved, but loved the quote).
I would also do (like to see) Muslim population control-like more of them killing each other.
Brian Hunter says
I’d like to see this grinning imbecile load up some friends and drive to a majority muslim neighborhood, park the car, put on some loud music and quaff a few beers. His chances of having an “accident” would be 100%.
Oliver says
Note the NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE POLL 1,079
If there were more people, I would guess that terrorism and national security would have been higher.
Wang is a Chinese name.
Why doesn’t he go back to China, and talk to the families of those killed by terrorists at a trains station ( was a JW post some time back)or other terrorist activities against ethnic Chinese in other countries?
As to compare it to WEATHER FATALITIES- I can quote Mark Twain- “everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it”.
This guy is an asshole.
IN MY OPINION
Cecilia Ellis says
“A Pew Research Center poll conducted in August shows that 40 percent of Americans believe there is a greater chance of a major attack today than at the time of the 9-11 attacks – the highest percentage in 14 years. Republicans are entirely responsible for the growth, according to the poll, with 58 percent concerned about the chances of an attack.”
To declare that “Republicans are entirely responsible for the growth” is a gross manipulation of facts. What facts would those be? Well, here are the real reasons for increased concern:
Jihad attacks since 9/11: 29,217
Jihad attacks in August 2016: 203
Killed in those attacks: 1637
Injured in those attacks: 1734
Countries in which those attacks occurred: 33
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
In an article entitled, “The Kafir’s Blood Is Halal for You. So She’d It,” published in the first issue of ISIS’ online magazine, “Rumiyah,” the true responsibility has been addressed:
“Muslims currently living in Dar al-Kufr must be reminded that the boos of the disbelievers is halal, and killing them is a form of worship to Allah, the Lord, King, and God of mankind. This includes the businessman riding to work in a taxicab, the young adults (post-pubescent “children”) engaged in sports activities in the park, and the old man waiting in line to buy a sandwich. Indeed, even the blood of the kafir street vendor selling flowers to those passing by is halal to shed — and striking terror into the hearts of all disbelievers is a Muslim’s duty. There is no shar’i requirement to target soldiers and policemen nor judges and politicians, but all kuffar who are not under the covenant of dhimmah are fair game. How can the disbelievers ever dream of safety and security while Muslims suffer anywhere in the world and while the rule of Allah is mockingly replaced by manmade monstrosities of democracy?” (page 36)
http://am3qengl.ga/imgs/rumiyah1.pdf
No, responsibility lies not with Republicans, but with those who pursue a relentless war against any citizenry or any individual who refuses to submit to Islamic rule.
Arian Smith says
So I guess we have to wait until terrorists kill more people on average than cars do before we start to worry about it?
Jim Hilborn says
The logical failure here is twofold. The first fallacy is that auto fatalities and jihadists victims are 3xclusive to each other. The reality is that Muslim threats to the innocent are in addition to the chances motorists voluntarily assume.
The second, and worse logical mistake is the assumption that jihadists killings of the innocent (murder) is static and will remain, even unchecked,at the same level. This has not been the historical experience. The writer is a fool.
Kay says
The writer is a fool. And he’s trying to make those concerned about terrorism sound foolish.
I’m sick and tired of this kind of callous relitavism.
But his argument was to prove that H had more points in her favor. (I.e. A person could feel proud of caring about more than our citizens and laws being under attack.)
Funny that he didn’t list even one.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
‘The Bliss Institute’?
That really does say it all.
Blangwort says
Does anyone think it is okay to do nothing but wait until the likelihood of being killed by Muslim terror is equal to that of dying in a traffic accident? I don’t.
Robert Crawford says
An African-American male is 19 times more likely to be shot by another African-American than by a police officer, yet what is the focus of “Black Lives Matter”?
I wonder if Wang has considered that little fact, and if he’s mentioned it to BLM activists.
citycat says
He’s out of context wilfully.
All Muslim endeavours are to propagate Islam.
Terrorists are a part of Islam’s advance.
There’s no need for Islam to use terrorists to spread Islam.
Terrorism is like the war cry.
Is it in retrospect, advance or both?
He is also dangerous, with his twisted truth to try to mind bend the infidels.
Islam is all days in all ways.
Is the beast too close to see?
Is the beast transforming?
The beast is saying more than the other religions.
The beast is getting a lot of attention, and wasting infidel endeavours while the beast plods merrily on.
Some Muslims are not merry but the beast is devouring merrily on.
Will the Muslims do nothing to stop the beast?
Not with death penalty.
thelastvirgingoat says
True the chance of dying in a terrorist attack is very small.but the chance your daughters genitals will be mutilated wil rise. Every day if the problem isn’t addressed.
Mubarak says
To compare unintended killings in car-accidents to intended killings in terrorist attacks reminds me of an article by Theodore Dalrymple: “The knife went in”. –
And that is the unarticulated ethics this guy wants to promote: To deny people agency and responsibility for their actions according to the fatalistic Islamic saying: “Inch’Allah”. – Now, that’s dehumanizing!
dumbledoresarmy says
Hm. The author of this bizarre piece referred to a “Pew Research Poll” that had been conducted amongst Americans.
I wonder whether he would be game to investigate what those same Pew Research people have discovered, in many recent surveys, about the attitudes, beliefs and goals of Muslims, whether Muslims living within the West / other non-Muslim lands, or Muslims in majority-Muslim countries?
Dustin Koellhoffer says
Moslems are working on changing that.
Douglas Light says
“You’re far more likely to die in a traffic accident than in a terrorist attack in Ohio.”
This is true. Some of us would like to keep it that way. Liberals are so confused.
Oliver says
I have two other thoughts on this anal pore’s ( my opinion) writing.
One–Ohio has so little to show for itself, that therefore there will not be terrorists attacks (in Ohio). Just nothing worthwhile to destroy.
Two-he wants the number of terrorist attacks to increase, and surpass accidental deaths.
I admit-unusual thoughts- but this writer is (as has been said by others, and myself) a jerk and asshole.
Richard Courtemanche says
Accidents are accidents, terrorist incidents are terrorism. Don’t compare the two.
Troybeam says
With the influx of Islamic refugees these terror attacks will become fluent in each and every state where they reside along with demands for sharia law which will become a political agenda when “AMERICAN MUSLIMS” seek political office which by the way is already happening bringing in Muslim judges, elected officials and those seeking office,
REMEMBER PEOPLE A NATION CANNOT LIVE UNDER 2 SETS OF LAW: OUR CONSTITUTION AND IF ISLAM HAS ITS WAY SHARIA LAW.
Karen says
“That includes the 2001 attacks that claimed nearly 3,000 in one day. Minus that one day, the average is about a dozen deaths a year over two decades.”
A number of writers, like Mr. Wang, like to discard that ‘one day’ of 3000+ deaths as a statistical anomaly; an unfair, unjust outlier that skews the data in a direction they don’t like. How much nicer things look when they throw out that one bad number. Yes, Mr. Wang, just ignore the data you don’t like.
What is the point of an article like this? Am I not supposed to worry about terrorism until the number exceeds some approved value? Mr. Wang employs mockery and false comparison here; virtually no one would include traffic fatalities as presidential campaign topics.
Dumb article…..
Ray M says
“Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe.” It is said Elbert Einstein said this whether or not he did does not matter.
Infinite human stupidity and Mr. Wang proves this point.