He might not have known that the boy was saying no, you see. As if raping a ten-year-old boy is just fine if the boy is saying yes.
This kind of legalistic twaddle — always in favor of Muslim migrants, never at their expense — heralds the demise of Europe and the West.
“Migrant jailed for attack on boy, 10, over ‘sexual emergency’ has conviction OVERTURNED,” by Indra Warnes, Express, October 21, 2016:
AN IRAQI asylum seeker who confessed to raping a 10-year-old boy in a swimming pool, claiming it was a “sexual emergency”, has had his conviction overturned.
Amir A., 10 [sic: the victim, not the attacker, is 10], who is married with a child of his own, was visiting the Theresienbad pool in the Austrian capital of Vienna last December as part of a trip to encourage integration.
He was accompanied by a 15-year-old translator, who had befriended the schoolboy who was at the swimming pool alone.
When the youngster went to the showers, Amir A. allegedly followed him, pushed him into a toilet cubicle, and violently sexually assaulted him.
Following the attack, the accused rapist returned to the pool and was practising on the diving board when police arrived, after the 10-year-old raised the alarm with the lifeguard.
The child suffered severe anal injuries which had to be treated at a local children’s hospital, and is still plagued by serious post-traumatic stress disorder.
In a police interview, Amir A. confessed to the crime; telling officers the incident had been “a sexual emergency”, as his wife had remained in Iraq and he “had not had sex in four months”.
A court found Amir guilty of serious sexual assault and rape of a minor, and sentenced him to six years in jail.
However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no.
According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.
The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
The sentence was therefore lifted, although Amir is expected to remain in custody until the rape case returns to the regional court next year….
linnte says
Since WHEN can a ten year old give consent?
Salome says
I think that some of those non-English-speaking countries don’t have a concept of statutory rape, or of being under an age that vitiates consent. Note also that in Germany they have just changed the law so that women don’t actually have to be endangering themselves by putting up a physical fight in order to demonstrate lack of consent.
linnte says
I disagree! Child sex abuse is anathema in Europe. Just like America and Canada. I am not appalled by child sexual assault because I was raised to think that way. It is instinctual to reject child sexual abuse. Even animals wait until estrus before attempting mating.
carol says
linnte says “I am not appalled by child sexual assault because I was raised to think that way.”
I think you must have meant to say “child physical assault” e.g. a whack on the bum?
linnte says
Carol, I am not sure what you are asking. Having sex with a child is the deepest depravity and perversion ever. I believe in the death penalty for child molestors because there is no cure for predatory child abusers. This man who had his sexual “emergency” at the pool has absolutely NO regard for the innocence of children. This makes him a very ill person who cannot be cured. He WILL assault again. Guaranteed.
As for spanking an insubordinate child, ask my boys about “the wooden spoon”. Yes, I spanked, but for complete insubordination only. Just hauling off and smacking a kid for something the kid did out of line, like letting a cuss word fly, is irresponsible on the part of the parent, and abuse imo.
linnte says
Maybe I see what you are questioning. I was raised to know it is wrong for adults to have sex with a child. But even if I wasn’t taught that, it is instinctual and cultural that sex with a child is wrong. Like marrying a sibling is wrong instinctually. Does that clarify what I meant? ?
gravenimage says
carol wrote:
linnte says “I am not appalled by child sexual assault because I was raised to think that way.”
I think you must have meant to say “child physical assault” e.g. a whack on the bum?
……………………………
Carol, I’m afraid you have completely misunderstood what Linnte was saying. You assume that she is saying that she is fine with child rape because she was (supposedly) raised to accept children being spanked.
I have no idea what Linnte’s view is of spanking–but it does not matter, because this is *not* the point she was making.
When Linnte wrote: “I am not appalled by child sexual assault because I was raised to think that way”, she does not mean that she is not appalled by child sexual assault, but that the reason she is appalled by it is not just because she was raised to consider it wrong, but because humans instinctually consider sexual abuse of children to be wrong.
Hope that clarifies things.
gravenimage says
Salome, this is not about “non-English-speaking countries”, but about the barbarism of Islam.
It is Muslims who are responsible for this epidemic of rape across Britain and Europe.
nothosaur says
It’s about Austrian law. The capacity to consent is important in US law I’m all 50 states. Apparently, it’s unimportant in Austria. Austrian criminal law is a joke.
Elizabeth says
So true, people are not seeing this as it is rape, we are living in what the word of God says in Isaiah 5:20 (the bad good and the good bad) read about it and you will see
gravenimage says
Jon Lon wrote:
I thought this barbaric retardo cult throws gays off buildings.
………………..
What Islam objects to is any consensual relations between adult males.
Pedophilia and raping males to humiliate them are rife in Islam.
Brit says
To Salome, Good point.
To linnte, I think you may have misunderstood Salome’s point. My guess is she meant
something like this: horrible as it is that it took this to happen, but at least now, the
injustice of Austria’s and Germany’s rape laws are being exposed. From what I
remember I think the boy’s mother bravely spoke out. If she hadn’t, most likely
this case would have been covered up like countless similar ones seem to have
been.
To Gravenimage,
The fact that Austria and Germany are “non-english-speaking countries”
(lol, vast majority of Austrians & Germans speak english!) probably is
relevant to this particular injustice of their rape laws. In other words, I guess
in countries with english based laws it’s still rape even if you don’t fight back,
and it’s still child rape even if the child openly encourages it.
Brit says
Correction:
Please substitute “innocently” for “openly” in the last line of my previous comment.
gravenimage says
Brit wrote:
To Gravenimage,
The fact that Austria and Germany are “non-english-speaking countries”
(lol, vast majority of Austrians & Germans speak english!) probably is
relevant to this particular injustice of their rape laws. In other words, I guess
……………………………
I do know that, Brit–I was just replying to Salome’s assertion that this was about “non-english-speaking countries”. Most Germans and Austrians speak fluent English. (Not that it is especially salient, but I actually speak some German myself).
More:
in countries with english based laws it’s still rape even if you don’t fight back,
and it’s still child rape even if the child openly encourages it.
……………………………
Yes–this is the only point where language is somewhat relevant: that most Anglophone nations–the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the countries of the UK itself–have laws that derive ultimately from English Common Law.
But the main problem, I think, is that Austria and other European nations are not *enforcing the civilized laws they do have*. This is a problem in Anglophone nations, as well–really, the whole of the West.
In Austria, for instance, the age of consent is 14–sex with a child younger than this is indeed statutory rape:
https://www.ageofconsent.net/world/austria
(Like most nations, they have a “close-in-age” exemption–none of that would apply here, or with such a young child)
Australian law provides that adults having sexual intercourse with a child under 14 may be punished with a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
Moreover, any rape that resulted in *anal tearing*–as this one did–should be considered a violent assault.
carol says
Salome…the change of law in Germany is definitely the way it should be because when a less powerful person is being attacked they automatically need to rely upon their instincts – sometimes fighting might prevent the attack but often it can trigger far worse violation both physically and mentally.
It appears the need to call out “NO” (for the record) may soon need to be ingrained upon the minds of people of all ages (thanks multiculturalism). I wonder if anyone delved into the possibility that the 15 year old cultivated this young boy and set him up for the predator.
Diana says
Since Muhammad married a nine-year-old.
Dum Spiro says
And since this as well: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/06/it-is-permissible-for-the-mujahid-to-enjoy-young-boys-in-the-absence-of-women
None of you Hillary voters reading this have toddler sons or grandsons now, do you? And don’t google Montreal rapist either…
— Spero
gravenimage says
Important point, Dum Spiro.
I thought this barbaric retardo cult throws gays off buildings.
………………..
What Islam objects to is any consensual relations between adult males.
Pedophilia and raping males to humiliate them are rife in Islam.
bernie says
That disgusting pederast pervert should have gotten the full fifteen years in jail. It’s absolutely clear that the little boy didn’t consent to it.
If this overturned sentence stays overturned, then Austria is truly finished as a culture and as a country.
billdeserthills says
Diana muhammed married a 6 year old, he waited until she was 9 to have intercourse with her. Unlike typical sex-crazed muslim trash, muhammed was able to control himself for several years–A slightly better class of intolerant muslim scum
shosh7154 says
It is written in the Hadith that the six-year-old child taken by Mohamed was heard crying late into the night. In real life, he did not wait until the child was nine years old.
DFD says
Since Islam
Terry Gain says
Since when does a Muslim require consent.
Karen says
Brilliant comment Linnte, and very important. Even in Austria the age of consent is still 14. Woopies, more unintended consequences for those enlightened progressives who seek to eliminate problems with the brush of the legislative pen. It would be hard to find a better example of blaming the victim, in this case a ten year old raped by a savage.
fudge says
here here
mustapha crap says
Exactly a CHILD cannot give consent by virtue of the fact they are a child, therefore it is a simple matter of statutory rape no debate a child cannot give consent and in the absence of consent sexual penetration is RAPE.
This filthy Iraqi child raping scum needs to be castrated and hanged from a streetlamp outside the swimming pool. I hope that there are some real men in Germany with the guts to stand up for their women and children and start to dish out proper justice to the perpetrators of these vile acts.
All over Europe our cowardly bought and paid for (by the likes of repulsive creature George Soros) corrupt political classes have facilitated the mass importation of subhuman filth who provide no benefit to mankind by their continued existence. There needs to be a rising across the western world, the beginning of a new crusade against the vile barbarity of Islam infesting our lands
Anne Smith says
I am surprised that retaliation acts have not started yet. This sort of behaviour by Mujslim savages would have caused rapid retribution a few years ago.
Where is the will in Europe to fight back?
paul says
the NAZI party in Germany has been reborn
linnte says
I believe there is a Crusades movement beginning. But it is happening slowly, and too slowly for me! Also, many groups, like PEGIDA, are working hard to get the common person fired up. It is just very difficult to take a stand when you could be arrested or lose your job for “hate speech”. There is a Facebook group that actually calls themselves the New Crusaders, American based.
Ron says
Islam is a disease in the ME. And most of us thought this kind of barbarity
had disappeared from history.
Had the child been my son I would have paid this monster’s bail, then found some place to put his body after some very selective surgery without anesthesia.
What would Hillary have to say about this horrendous crime? Not much.
The 1.5 million Germans who have left Germany to escape these vermin should have impeached their government, organized against the insane immigration policy, forced the repatriation of every single Muslim and let these cockroaches know enough is enough.
paul says
since the judge does not want his house burned down. Its the threats against his family…
Mr. Farton says
The Austrian court members have gone full retard on this one. That’s dispicable and shows no regard for the human rights of the victim. Repugnant. This so called refuggee should be shipped back to Iraq ASAP.
Shaun says
Austria, you’ve just advertised yourself as a child rape tourist spot. Your global reputation is gone.
I would never let my daughter travel to Austria now.
Forget Mozart, Austria has a new image.
cameron says
Send people like this to permanent exile on a penal colony outside of the civilized world. Antarctica or an island north of Siberia or similar.
Smarticus says
Maybe the bottom of a pit: “Oh, you’ll find plenty of earth and water down there!”
gravenimage says
I don’t think Russia should have to suffer this scum. Send him back to Dar-al-Islam.
Taker weams says
If the rapist were white, this whole consent nonsense would nevr be raised. Sex with a minor is rape regardless of consent. This is because minors are leaglly unable to consent. IMO elevating muslims above the law of the land is not a good idea – in fact it is horrific. Medieval punishments must be meted out to the judge, local councils and any authority figures that had ANYTHING to do with this sick story
Mubarak says
I am not condoning such a despicable act – if you can believe me – I just wonder if the Muslim world has produced serial killers that can be compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy and many others like them from our civilized part of the world? Does anybody know?
No Fear says
The serial killer you mention is the “Prophet” Mohammed. He raped, encouraged his henchmen to rape, and he killed Jews by the dozen. All the details are in the muslim source texts such as the Quran and the Hadith.
Mubarak says
I wonder to what extent the rapist was inspired by his prophet or his lust, when he committed the crime?
No Fear says
Child molestation knows no boundaries. Unfortunately religious leaders are often involved.
gravenimage says
No Fear, Islam is the only creed that *sacralizes* pedophilia.
Jay Boo says
Definitely
His “prophet”
Islam is the only religion in the world that honors (a sociopathic pervert man) who owned child sex slaves made orphan by his sex-slaving raids.
Did I forget to mention:
The only religion in the (WHOLE WORLD) that does such filth.
No Others
No One
Nada
What a disgusting pig-bath is Islam.
Filth
No others — The Whole World
Greyhound Fancier says
The “prophet” murdered many personally and inspired millions of other murders. Yet the followers do not disavow the mass killer and genocidal psychopath, but centuries later continue his evil behavior as a religious obligation.
Serial killers in the civilized world if found are locked up/executed to stop their crimes.
Mubarak says
PS:
If the point of the article is, that because the rapist was a Muslim his crime is weighed differently than if the same crime had been committed by a non-Muslim my comment above might be a little beside the point.
Greyhound Fancier says
Mubarak, in the civilized world the assumption is that any adult having sexual relationships with a 10-year-old is a pedophile rapist, much like the Mohammedan “prophet”.
Children cannot consent to sexual acts, and they are not physically or psychologically ready for sex. Therefore, in the civilized world, the laws protect children from predators. Poor little Aisha! If only she’d not caught the eye of the pervert “prophet”…
linnte says
Oh you can bet his crime was weighed differently. Like not weighed at all! He should have gotten a stiff sentence instead of a slap on the hand. But because you apparently accept his sexual need as being important, your words make me recoil.
This case makes me wonder how many other children have been the recipients of sexual emergencies in Europe and the UK, and how many have gotten off with basically no punishment. Because everyone is afraid of sending Muslims into a victim pushing FRENZY. Islam is like a tank full of parronnah (sp) and when a hapless victim of Muslim Ideology gets thrown in bleeding, the victim is viciously destroyed. This boy may or may not ever recover from this rape. But My doesn’t care.
linnte says
That should be Mu, not My.
gravenimage says
Good posts from Greyhound Fancier and Linnte.
gravenimage says
More crap from the appalling Mubarak:
PS:
If the point of the article is, that because the rapist was a Muslim his crime is weighed differently than if the same crime had been committed by a non-Muslim my comment above might be a little beside the point.
………………………….
Civilized Westerners revile *all* child rape.
The only way this Muslim rapist’s crime was “weighted differently* from those of other pedophiles was that the he was *given a pass* because he is Muslim and the rape of children is permitted under that foul creed.
The idea that Muslims are somehow being treated harshly because they are Muslims is belied by this very article.
There has a been an avalanche of rape and pedophilia committed by Muslims ever since they began invading Europe in huge numbers–this is not something Infidels are doing.
Moreover, Mubarak has lauded Muslims raping us many times–including when they rape little children.
Mubarak has claimed that we *deserve* to be raped by his coreligionists for allowing lingerie ads and women to attend public celebrations.
Veka Fitzfrancis says
What lingerie ad set this pedophile off?
It’s bs and the world knows it.
gravenimage says
Good question, Veka.
Here’s what the vile Mubarak wrote concerning his coreligionists raping women on New Year’s Eve in Europe:
Mubarak says
February 16, 2016 at 4:27 am
I know it is not political correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.
Is this offense of public nudity informed by a morality that is loftier than the one that is protested against —? And the West is filled with vulgar, public commercials…
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853
He has gone on to spout much more apologia for rape, including–as here–the rape *of children*.
Tanker weams says
You know full well that the Dahmers, Bundys et al are reviled by the general population. Contrast this to the islamic sickos that have the absolute tacit(often much more than tacit ie logistical, financial and moral) support from the muslim community because they are acting in accordance to the poxy koran. Chalk and cheese mon amigo – better try at trolling next time.
Champ says
“Murbarak” wrote:
“I am not condoning such a despicable act – if you can believe me – I just wonder if the Muslim world has produced serial killers that can be compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy and many others like them from our civilized part of the world? Does anybody know?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The stealth-jihad agenda that “Mubarak” is operating under comes into clearer focus with this comment.
Ernie says
Dear Champ , Mubarak is taunting nearly non stop . He is very smart , intelligent and cunning , and I’m quite sure he has enjoyed high level education in the west . From his language skills I guess he has lived in the West ( U.S.A.) a long time , was born here or moved to the U.S.A. before the age of say 6 or 7 years . I have a feeling he is on this blog not only for personal reasons . I don’t trust him . There are plenty organisations monitoring this blog for information purposes , it would be naive to think otherwise . He could be an agent provocateur , it seems to me this is the case . I can’t prove anything at all , but my gut-feeling is : something definitely is wrong here . Take good care Champ !
gravenimage says
Agreed, Ernie.
Champ says
Hi Ernie!
Your assessment of “Mubarak” sounds spot on and I concur. And I don’t trust him either.
Take care, my friend! 🙂
linnte says
Mu, so you are comparing this Muslim to Serial killers? Serial killers are sociopaths and insane. Islamic men who practice sexual emergencies and rape are following Muhammad. You just insulted your Prophet in the biggest way ever. Congratulations!
gravenimage says
Good points, Tanker Weams, Champ, and Linnte.
Jay Boo says
Ditto and to you as well gravenimage
gravenimage says
🙂
gravenimage says
The vile Mubarak wrote:
I am not condoning such a despicable act – if you can believe me – I just wonder if the Muslim world has produced serial killers that can be compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy and many others like them from our civilized part of the world? Does anybody know?
…………………………….
Uh huh–just an “innocent” question. Instead, this is just more apologia for Muslim savagery.
These two thugs murdered forty-seven innocent people between them–a terrible toll.
Keep in mind that these names are watchwords for barbarism–they have been roundly denounced in the West. Dahmer committed his crimes in the 1980s; Bundy in the 1970s–they are still remembered, and still reviled.
They were both arrested, tried, and convicted. Ted Bundy was executed; Dahmer was killed in prison.
What about Muslims? Omar Mateen slaughtered forty-nine innocent people in a single spree–more than these two committed, in a single night.
Omar Mateen called himself a “Mujahideen”, “Islamic Soldier”, and “Soldier of God”.
There have been over 29,000 Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11–most with multiple victims, and all in the name of Islam.
Muslims *laud* Jihadists, and consider them “Martyrs”. Bundy and Dahmer were not acting in the name of their faith, and others do not admire them. Would that this were true of Jihadists.
More:
I wonder to what extent the rapist was inspired by his prophet or his lust, when he committed the crime?
…………………………….
What *absolute crap*. Infidels are not so consumed with “lust” that they are raping little ten-year-old boys.
Besides, Mubarak is pretending that we have no idea why this rapist acted; this is utterly false.
Here is the original story:
“Australia: Muslim refugee rapes 10-year-old boy, says what he did is not a crime because it’s acceptable in his homeland”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/09/australia-muslim-refugee-rapes-10-year-old-boy-says-what-he-did-is-not-a-crime-because-its-acceptable-in-his-homeland
He is making a point that this vicious crime is sanctioned in Islam.
Moreover, the appalling Mubarak is minimizing a Muslim raping a small child on this thread:
“Germany: Muslim migrant sexually assaults 6-year-old boy in changing room”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/germany-muslim-migrant-sexually-assaults-6-year-old-boy-in-changing-room
He is also *blaming the victim*. *Ugh*.
Mubarak says
“What *absolute crap*. Infidels are not so consumed with “lust” that they are raping little ten-year-old boys.”
Sorry! I forgot to mention the Catholic Church in my self-flagellation.
gravenimage says
It is not Infidels who are claiming “sexual emergencies”.
Raping little boys is *illegal* in the West–not so in Dar-al-Islam.
Who can forget Mubarak blaming the West–and even the boy’s father–for his coreligionist’s raping a six-year-old child:
Mubarak says
May 12, 2016 at 5:33 am
If the West was more careful with its own moral hygiene and e.g. stopped the war on boys and masculinity (Christina Hoff Sommers), it wouldn’t be so susceptible to these opportunistic Islamic infections.
The wrestling event in Munich was probably an American and feminist inspired, inter-gender wrestling event, where no distinction is made between boys and girls, so how could the refugee from Afghanistan tell the difference?
Not that an “interference” with a girl would be that much better, but it would assert
some higher degree of normality although misdirected and criminal. –
Why did the father leave his son alone in the cabin, by the way —? A symbolic picture of the incident and of father-son relations these days.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/germany-muslim-migrant-sexually-assaults-6-year-old-boy-in-changing-room#comment-1433792
*Lots* more ugliness from the foul Mubarak on that thread.
No Infidel here is whitewashing pedophilic rape. Would that were true of the appalling Mubarak.
Jay Boo says
Islam’s hadith says that MO’s sleaze is Islam’s SOP.
Brit says
Obviously serial killing is common in the islamic world. They call it honour killing. It’s usually an extended family affair, condoned by islamic texts, culture and state.
Angemon says
Mubarak posted:
“I am not condoning such a despicable act – if you can believe me – I just wonder if the Muslim world has produced serial killers that can be compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy and many others like them from our civilized part of the world? Does anybody know?”
Have you read the biography of muhammad and his companions? Is someone who desires to murder, rape and enslave other people, not because he is mentally unstable but because he considers it to be a divine commandment from his god, worse than any of the people you mentioned? Remember that video of an ISIS member eating the heart of one of his victims? And exactly what do Jeffrey Dahmer or Ted Bundy have to do with islma and muslims in this context, other than to make a false equivalence and lull kuffars to sleep with the sound of “you know, we’ve had our share of nasty people so maybe we should give them a free pass”.
Jeffrey Dahmer killed 17 people over 13 years. Ted Bundy killed 30 people over 17 years. The Orlando shooter killed 49 people in a couple or so of hours. The Bataclan murderers killed 130 people in a few hours. Where’s the equivalence?
Cretius says
My late wife was schizophrenic. She had voices that told her to do bad things, including killing. In the 7th century she would not have been treatable.
gravenimage says
Cretius, I hope your wife got the care she needed before her passing. I am sorry for your loss.
As for Muhammed, it is not so much that his case–if he was indeed schizophrenic, which is quite possible–was not treatable when he lived.
It is that he gained such a following, and that that following continues *today*.
carol says
I believe Muhammed did make statements that might support at least some schizophrenic element within his makeup (you never know where at least a pinch of compassion might be warranted). Today there’s a quite interesting post by “Brian” in the Sunday Express regarding this same rape article. He describes the findings of a Danish psychologist/researcher Nikolai Sennels regarding “The Disastrous Results of Muslim Inbreeding”. It’s too lengthy to paste here so I’ll provide the link:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/723868/Migrant-jailed-Austria-attack-boy-10-sexual-emergency-has-conviction-OVERTURNED
carol says
Mubarak says “Isn’t that hate speech?
It is so easy to be tricked into playing the enemy’s game by using his means and methods.”
Sometimes you have to set up an alarm by showing honest emotion. To do otherwise IMO would more likely mislead and delay results. In this case we clearly KNOW which came first – the chicken or the egg – and thus have the right to respond in kind. That response, fortunately, is FAR short of indiscriminate, barbaric licence and this is why, (in the words of Brigitte Gabriel), “THEY Must be Stopped”.
bernie says
Sure. In the early 2000’s there was Javed Iqbal in Pakistan, who raped and killed up to 100 boys and young men, collected their shoes and garments, and dissolved their bodies in acid. A furious Pakistani judge decreed that Javed should be strangled to death, and then himself dissolved in acid. I doubt that that sentence was actually carried out though, he was probably just hanged to death.
Cretius says
Emasculate the bastard as a lesson to the rest of those pedophile buggers.
Cretius says
I don’t speak German so if I rape an Austrian woman who does not speak English then it is okay – NOT!!
Tanker weams says
Yes it is fine. So long as you are a ‘southerner’ or are of ‘meditteranean’ appearance. They are above any and all laws, for them to be accountable under western law is apparently bigotted and racist. It makes no sense to me either – it is causing hate and this will not end well. One rule for all is more fair in my humble opinion,
Ernie says
Dear Tanker weams : One rule for all works for civilized people , in a civilized environment . With barbarian invaders ( who have an entirely different background/cadre de referance/hence way of thinking and interpretation of what is fair and just ) we can’t afford such ahn attitude . We should , no , must punish them in a way THEY UNDERSTAND . My conclusion : BARBARIC PUNISHMENT FOR BARBARIANS . Translated to our western mindset and in this situation and as proposed by many others before ( and this is good and fair in my humble opinion ) : castration , and eviction . As a bonus and reminder for his co-religionists : every assault on a Westerner must be followed by the destruction of a mosque . Collective punishment is not regarded as fair in our civilized Western world , but , as I stated before , THEY WILL UNDERSTAND .
Ernie says
cadre de referance must read : cadre de reference , my apologies .
gravenimage says
Actually, Ernie, I don’t think we have to sink to the level of these barbarians.
We just have to consistently enforce our own civilized laws–something this Austrian judge is *not* doing.
Mark A says
A “sexual emergency”???? No such thing. This is just a euphemism for lack of self control.
This appalling ruling is indicative of the rot which infests most western judiciaries.
Overturning a rape conviction, particularly a rape against a child, because the offender lacked the self control to resist committing the act is a very dangerous precedent.
I wonder whether the judge would be so accommodating if someone was to experience a “sexual emergency” and use the judge or a member of the judge’s family to alleviate their “sexual emergency.”
It’s no wonder so many of us have little or no respect for judges.
tgusa says
“I wonder whether the judge would be so accommodating if someone was to experience a “sexual emergency” and use the judge or a member of the judge’s family to alleviate their “sexual emergency.”
In days gone by in what increasingly seems to be like a galaxy far away this sort of thinking would have been, well for me, unthinkable. I am beginning to understand that the only way for these lunatic enforcers of selective, and quite frankly, insane law that are among us to understand is through experience. People have a fundamental right to create their own legitimate Courts. These Courts should always be professional in every way. No pitchforks and or torches, no innocent men set upon by mobs, especially judicial mobs. Doing that would make us no different than those we are fighting. Now getting an honorable western man to carry out the verdict, that will be hard.
carol says
Mark A. says: “A “sexual emergency”???? No such thing. This is just a euphemism for lack of self control.”
I think some big expert in sexuality once said:
‘Anyone who can go for a month without sex, can go for a lifetime without it.”
bernie says
The sexual emergency defense is a total crock. The Iraqi guy could have gone to an adult prostitute (female or male) for a consensual, paid sexual encounter. I don’t know whether or not prostitution is legal in Austria, but even if it isn’t, he could have been discreet and he likely wouldn’t have faced any legal repercussions.
Not the most moral thing in the world (as I have noted previously), but not nearly as bad as what he did to that little boy.
Mark A says
A 10 year old cannot give consent.
What an utterly appalling ruling by the Austrian Supreme Court.
Carolyne says
[I wonder if the Austrian Supreme Court is made up of sexual perverts. All Muslim men are perverts, whether they act on it or not. It’s in their “Holy book” and in their DNA. It must be contagious since the Supreme Court approves of it maybe they have caught the “Bug.”
carol says
Maybe it’s just some stupid technicality and things will change next year. We all seem to be forgetting the closing lines:
“The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
The sentence was therefore lifted, although Amir is expected to remain in custody until the rape case returns to the regional court next year….”
And what does this mean?:
“According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.”
Could it mean that if someone gives consent but then the partner gets ugly or carried away and somehow injures them then it’s only an “assault”? The boy was undoubtedly injured anally – does the defense think “collateral damage during a consensual relationship” will elude a conviction for rape??
Edgar Allen says
“Yes means yes” except when the perp is a Muslim.
This case makes a good argument for establishing justifiable street justice as a method of people revolt.
Andrew Williams says
Edgar, ‘yes means yes’ is a twisted approach to sex which isn’t supposed to be so clinical.
‘No means no’ worked fine for a long time until feminists got their mitts into things.
And there is no consent in any form for an adult and a minor. It is statutory rape. The only mitigating circumstances are close together ages (eg. a 14 year old with a 17 year old, instead of a 14 year old with a 27 year old — there is legal precedent for a Romeo and Juliet law).
J-pal says
Isn’t the twist interesting enough, this “sexual emergency”-thing. In an emergency he abuses a minor, a boy and walk out of it, keep in swimming – with completely no remorse, or anything. Isn’t Amir breaking his marriage? Does the wife know? This “Amir”-thing is guilty of several crimes… nd the court itself should be scrutinized – by this, they ONLY make more money!!! How about the boy? Who had to “pay” his treatment? “The child suffered severe anal injuries which had to be treated at a local children’s hospital, and is still plagued by serious post-traumatic stress disorder.”
I think the “Amir”-beast has not yet been punished for what he did… Actually, he ‘should be punished’!
In a police interview, Amir A. confessed to the crime; telling officers the incident had been “a sexual emergency”, as his wife had remained in Iraq and he “had not had sex in four months”.
A court found Amir guilty of serious sexual assault and rape of a minor, and sentenced him to six years in jail.
However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no.
According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.
The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
I find it very hard to even think of a boy wanting to have sex with the “Amir”-thing in a toilet at a public bath… Shame on you, Amir and your friends – the “court”!
Greyhound Fancier says
Does Austria now have 10 as the age of consent? No more statutory rape?
Carolyne says
In an interesting reversal of roles, it seems the wife took a second husband.
In any case, this is aggravated sexual assault and rape and was prosecuted as such. The Austrian Supreme Court must consist of fools who have had lobotomies.
BLC says
These Muslim stories just sink lower and lower into depravity.
J-pal says
Yes – by full support of so called courts and lawyers in the west… But, I guess they want to handle these cases perfectly – otherwise Muslims will sue them afterward and reward the criminals, giving remedy for the unfair treatment in jail, in society, …never ending…atrocities…
PRCS says
As is so common, the headline is misleading, as the article itself makes clear:
“However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no.
According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.
The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
The sentence was therefore lifted, although Amir is expected to remain in custody until the rape case returns to the regional court next year…”.
He has not been exonerated, and will likely (and hopefully) remain in jail for some time to come.
Though being completely unfamiliar with German law, I rather imagine that the next phase of this prosecution will embarrass the defense when it is made clear that a ten year old boy is not competent to consent to sex–especially with an adult–and that the boy was quite probably yelling Nein! Halt! Nein!
Shmooviyet says
Won’t be surprised when local officials begin suggesting more modest swimming attire for Western children, so they aren’t running around pools throwing poor, helpless migrants into “emergencies” which must be immediately relieved.
Even if his wife had accompanied him on that trip, one wonders if she would have been his preferred “outlet” for that particular SE…
katherine says
Definitely not : she won’t be preferred because this young Houri is more desirable than all the 72 Virgins and his wife isn’t even a virgin – sad.
Charli Main says
“Even if his wife had accompanied him on that trip, one wonders if she would have been his preferred “outlet” for that particular SE”
Women are last in the Muslim pecking order, in cases of ” sexual emergencies”. Children, followed by goats are preferable to women.
Carolyne says
Don’t forget an especially attractive camel.
linnte says
Carolyne! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA!
Brit says
In Afghanistan, when Americans explained to childless Afghan men that vaginal sex was needed in order to conceive, the Afghan men were thoroughly disgusted. I suppose women are held in such contempt in Afghan society that when they told their husbands they were doing it wrong, they just weren’t believed.
Cy Halothrin says
> Shmooviyet said:
> Even if his wife had accompanied him on that trip, one wonders
> if she would have been his preferred “outlet” for that particular SE…
I’m sure the perp would have preferred his daughter. Of course, Later he have had to behead her to restore the family’s honor, since the daughter had sex outside of marriage.
gravenimage says
Austria: Muslim migrant who raped 10-year-old boy has conviction overturned
……………………
Well, this is just suicidal insanity.
Raping a ten-year-old child–especially to the point of *anal injury*–is both rape and statutory rape, whether the child is too frightened to protest or not.
Peter Ahlskog says
And the responsible authorities are aware of all their bizarreness. The Muslim minority must be protected to any cost. For many years I thought that the political correct in power didn’t know all these things about Islam. But they do know. And they don’t protect girls, women and boys from being raped, they don’t punish the majority of the criminals, if there are punishments they are ridiculously low.
In Europe we have learned how it is to live in countries where the government, authorities and courts no longer have the ambition to protect its own citizens. Where it is NOT racist when Muslims call our daughters “cheap meat” or “free meat” or “sex automat”. But I am a racist when I complain at airport security check that women with burqa just can pass the controls without being touched or scanned, while I have to take off my jacket, belt and shoes. And if I should say something like “It wasn’t people like me who started to bring weapons into air planes and crash them into houses” – and the burqa woman hears it and calls the police, I would get 4 months in prison for racism. Our Freedom of Speech is gone.
https://youtu.be/bzMCrCNmc3c
Kay says
How can this be?
What of the poor child’s parents?
Is society at large crying out over this outrage?
Ali Bey says
Sodomize the judges of the court who overturned the indiction.
Ali Bey says
Sodomize those judges if you have a sexual urgence.
tgusa says
Yeah, western men are going to listen to that, dumass.
Chris says
Death to Islamic rapists
Germanicus says
Actual story in German does not seem as bad as the Express makes it look.
Apparently a higher court decided that legally required findings for the rape conviction had not been made. The accused will be retried on the rape charge and will remain in detention until the new trial. Apparently, even if he manages to beat the rape rap, he would still be resentenced for serious “sexual assault.”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/austria-muslim-migrant-who-raped-10-year-old-boy-has-conviction-overturned
Germanicus says
Correction: link to story in Austrian paper is here:
http://www.krone.at/oesterreich/bub-in-hallenbad-vergewaltigt-urteil-aufgehoben-prozess-gegen-iraker-story-535355
PRCS says
PRCS says
October 21, 2016 at 8:41 pm
As is so common, the headline is misleading, as the article itself makes clear:
“However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no.
According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.
The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
The sentence was therefore lifted, although Amir is expected to remain in custody until the rape case returns to the regional court next year…”.
He has not been exonerated, and will likely (and hopefully) remain in jail for some time to come.
Though being completely unfamiliar with German law, I rather imagine that the next phase of this prosecution will embarrass the defense when it is made clear that a ten year old boy is not competent to consent to sex–especially with an adult–and that the boy was quite probably yelling Nein! Halt! Nein!
gravenimage says
Thanks, Germanicus.
Honking Goose says
WHAT? Are they insane in Austria’s courts? Is there really any chance that this scum would have stopped if he thought the child was saying NO?
Muslim Arab culture, (where it’s normal to rape a young boy if your wife is not around for sex) is not compatible with modernity. Sexual Emergency? Have they not heard of wanking?. Not all cultures are equal, just as not all people are equal.
Germanicus says
Here is another cheery news item from Austria:
“Police Interpreter Suspected of Fraud
Prosecutors in Vienna are investigating a police interpreter who had been used by security departments as an interpreter for the Persian languages Dari and Farsi.”
Apparently, the woman interpreter falsely claimed that Afghan and Iranian asylum seekers were illiterate, thus requiring longer interpretation times.
http://www.krone.at/oesterreich/polizeidolmetscherin-unter-betrugsverdacht-gebuehren-erschlichen-story-535559
Aton says
Don’t they have the law of ‘statuary rape’? By definition, any sex with a minor is statuary rape, with no further debate.
Aton
Cheesecake says
If the judges and government’ won’t protect its people the the citizens have a right to get justice themselves if that means killing rapists then so be it.
In the united kingdom we have labour councils turning a blind eye to the mass abuse and rape of native British girls because they would rather support a rapist than be accused of racism.
Marty says
100% correct.
As a peaceful sort of chap who studies history for pleasure,
I’d say everything is in place for civil uprisings &, when
mohammedans dominate large parts of the UK, civil war.
I regard the EU as failed experiment to redefine nation states,
as vassals to a new Fourth Reich.
Mohammedans, (Hitlers favourite religion) being favoured,
& Jews leaving. Sadly not for the UK.
Many EU workers in the UK could well be de facto refugees from
an increasingly islamised Europe. One in ten French citizens are now
muslims.
Mohammedans are a massively privileged group of immigrants who
refuse to assimilate. Ie they are colonisers.
We need a Martin Luther King, or Ghandi like figure to reclaim our
nation peacefully – with the aid, particularly of our WW2 Polish allies.
If not, the demographics guarantee civil war within 40 years on a scale
& of a nature unprecedented in English history.
gravenimage says
First we need to demand that Western authorities *enforce the law*.
f c king says
I’m not liberal, or hard core conservative. Birth control for women, gay, hell, if the sheep is of consenting age , to each their own.
This man should be gelded and sent home, as europeans don’t do the death penalty for anything.
One of the imams from CAIR should do a fatawah allowing the marriage of perps like this to marry goats, for “emergency” sex. Mohammad likely tried doing a dog, which didn’t cooperate. That’s why muslims are taught angels are afraid of dogs, so they are unclean, and can’t be in your home.
Ernie says
The assailant claimed acting out of SEXUAL EMERGENCY , however : RAPE is being used as a WEAPON OF WAR ! And it is ULTIMATE HUMILIATION . It took some time for me to remember this , ( old , sometimes foggy brain ) . This is JIHAD ! And where does it hurt most ? In hurting/damging OUR CHILDREN . No more castration and eviction . I want his HEAD .
TheOldOligarch says
The six year sentence itself was a complete insult to the victim and his family; the just sentence was death by hanging.
Ernie says
Sentencing to death by hanging would be a fitting punishment as well , OldOligarch .
Cretius says
Wrapped in a pigskin.
Ernie says
Of Course Cretius , he must not think he can have his 72 “virgins” .
daniel sebold says
You guys are all so narrow minded on this web site. If you had taken classes in cultural diversity from Minnesota State University, Mankato, you would be celebrating the rich cultural traditions of the world’s boy buggery cultures. So narrow minded.
burt says
What the hell is going on? It’s as if the elite are deliberately stoking up the people to rise up and attempt revolution! Do they want to trigger off civil war?
The decision is so obscene the boys father has got to feel no other duty other than to go full on Charles Bronson style and seek revenge with the legal freaks who overturned this pervert rapist Muslim migrant bastard.
carpediadem says
“Do they want to trigger off civil war?”
Yes., That is the aim behind the mass immigration push.
burt says
‘Overturned the sentence of’
carpediadem says
And another injured child is set on the path to distrust of the legal system, adults and the world in general in respect of his safety. He, like so many abuse victims, has learned he is dispensable.
Good job, Austria!
PRCS says
*PRCS says
October 21, 2016 at 8:41 pm
As is so common, the headline is misleading, as the article itself makes clear:
“However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no.
According to the Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp, while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual assault of a minor, there was not enough evidence to support the second charge of rape.
The appeal court said the initial ruling should have dealt with whether the offender thought that the victim had agreed with the sexual act, or whether he had intended to act against his will.
The sentence was therefore lifted, although Amir is expected to remain in custody until the rape case returns to the regional court next year…”.
He has not been exonerated, and will likely (and hopefully) remain in jail for some time to come.
Though being completely unfamiliar with German law, I rather imagine that the next phase of this prosecution will embarrass the defense when it is made clear that a ten year old boy is not competent to consent to sex–especially with an adult–and that the boy was quite probably yelling Nein! Halt! Nein!
*Germanicus says
October 22, 2016 at 3:31 am
Actual story in German does not seem as bad as the Express makes it look.
Apparently a higher court decided that legally required findings for the rape conviction had not been made. The accused will be retried on the rape charge and will remain in detention until the new trial. Apparently, even if he manages to beat the rape rap, he would still be resentenced for serious “sexual assault.”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/austria-muslim-migrant-who-raped-10-year-old-boy-has-conviction-overturned
http://www.krone.at/oesterreich/bub-in-hallenbad-vergewaltigt-urteil-aufgehoben-prozess-gegen-iraker-story-535355
Ron says
How much of this insanity must we endure. A legal system which chokes on every technicality for the benefit of lawyers, judges, and every other legal parasite serves no one’s best interest, justice isn’t served, and is a shame to us all.
Florida Jim says
The system is rigged we have allowed fools, morons, and Democrats to make decisions better off not being made by them and their foul ideology. Muslims will eventually behead Democrats.
Jay Boo says
The Democrat Party under Hillary will try to make up believe:
1 That this behavior is a new normal.
and that
2 Anyone criticizing Muslim men who violently rape children are the ones needing to be demonized by Hillary lackeys as hate ‘speechers’.
Carolyne says
Most Muslims, unless they demonstrate by word and deed that they wish to integrate with the indigenous society of a Western country, should be deported immediately before they have the opportunity to rape and pillage.
Mirren10 says
”However, in a bizarre twist, the Supreme Court today overturned the conviction, accepting the defence lawyer’s claim that the original court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realised the child was saying no”
This is why I utterly **despise** defence lawyers. They have no interest in truth, morality, or decency. All they care about is getting the ‘client’ off. Utterly sickening. I would say I wonder how this creature (the ‘defence’ lawyer) can sleep at night, but such scum have no conscience.
Same goes for the ‘Supreme Court’.
And yet more pandering to muslims, with the implication that this monster didn’t have a sufficient command of German, so didn’t ‘understand’ this poor little boy was saying no. Is the presumption then, that if the muslim pig had understood German better, he wouldn’t have committed the crime ? Dear God.
What the ‘Supreme Court’ of Austria is in effect saying, is that rape of a little boy, provided it is done by a migrant with an insufficient grasp of German, is excusable..
No wonder we are in such deep shit, with moral cretins like this in charge.
gravenimage says
Some defense lawyers are good people, Mirren. But yes–some will stoop to anything to get their clients off, even if they know they are guilty.
PRCS says
Who, among the German lawyers posting here today, would like to explain German law to the rest of us?
Ernie says
Austria isn’t Germany and Austrian law isn’ tGerman law PRCS .
PRCS says
So, Ernie, let me correct that:
Who, among the Austrian lawyers posting here today, would like to explain Austrian law to the rest of us?
The point is: there are a lot of people posting here about a foreign nation’s laws who haven’t got a clue about those laws.
Cole says
This is PC ness run amok. This is political and has nothing to do with crime nor laws. I’ve seen other videos where kids were hospitalized by migrants in Germany and the police tell the victims parents there’s nothing they can do as soon as the parents inform the authorities it was a refugee. Notice it was the German Supreme Court that overturned the lower courts conviction.