This will be denounced as “Islamophobic,” but is — after all the crimes committed by people in Muslim garb that covers their faces — simply a matter of national security and cultural defense.
“Bulgaria bans the burka – and offenders will LOSE their benefits,” by Leda Reynolds, Express, October 1, 2016:
BULGARIA has banned the burka – and warned those who flout the law will be fined £662 and lose their benefits.
Bulgaria’s parliament banned the wearing of face veils on Friday in a bid to boost security in the wake of Islamist militant attacks in Europe.
The new “burqa ban” law, which had been driven by the nationalist Patriotic Front coalition, comes after France, the Netherlands and Belgium banned the wearing of burqas or niqabs in public.
The ban will not only apply to Bulgarian citizens but also to anyone temporarily in the country.
The new law states that clothing that conceals the face may not be worn in the institutions of Bulgaria’s central and local administrations, schools, cultural institutions, and places of public recreation, sports and communications.
Krasimir Velchev, a senior lawmaker for the ruling GERB, said: “The law is not directed against religious communities and is not repressive.
“We made a very good law for the safety of our children.”
Covering the head, eyes, ears and mouth will only be permitted for health reasons, professional necessity and at sporting and cultural events.
The ban will also apply to houses of worship.
A minority of Muslim women in Europe cover their faces, but their veils have become symbols for some Europeans troubled by security, immigration and Muslim integration.
Muslims make up about 12 percent of Bulgaria’s 7.2 million population and most belong to a centuries-old community, largely ethnic Turks.
Many Bulgarians are concerned that the migrant inflows into Europe may pose a threat to their predominantly Orthodox Christian culture and help radicalise part of the country’s long-established Muslim minority….

Charli Main says
Muslims may be a minority population in Bulgaria but they will still regard the country as a part of Dar al islam and the Christian majority kaffirs illegally occupying THEIR LAND.
Infidel87 says
They claim everything.
Miglena Yoncheva says
This is not quite right.
Typical Bulgarian (and Balkan) Muslims are quite different and syncretic.
Many of them have a purely Bulgarian origin.
They live for centuries among Christians in Dar al Harb(Bulgaria), the land of the first apostles.
All problems are imported from outside of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Soros…
But this is a very long topic anyway…
dumbledoresarmy says
And how did they *become* Muslim, and why, if they are ethnically Bulgarian Muslims?
The answer is, for the most part, the hideous Dhimma system, which made life simply miserable for anyone under Muslim rule – remember, Turkish Muslims **Invaded and occupied and oppressed** Bulgaria and its people, for centuries.
To understand why there are native Bulgarians who are Muslims, read Rev Dr Mark Durie, “The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom” and Bat Yeor, “Islam and Dhimmitude” and “The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam”.
Then read Andrew Bostom “legacy of Jihad’, and use the index to find out about jihad in Bulgaria.
The impact of Islam on the Balkans, and on every piece of originally Christian and/ or pagan territory that Muslims invaded and imperially occupied, and systematically pillaged, and *squeezed* for jizya, was horrendous: economically, socially, and psychologically.
Here’s what normally-Islamophile Wikipedia says about the impact of (Turkish) Muslim imperialism upon Bulgaria:
“…By 1396, they were subjugated by the Ottoman Empire.
” Following the elimination of the Bulgarian nobility and clergy by the Turks, Bulgaria entered an age of oppression, intellectual stagnation and misgovernment that would leave its culture shattered and isolated from Europe for the next 500 years….”. (Do you mean *that* 500 years? No way was that peaceful coexistence of Muslims living ‘among’ non-Muslims; rather, it was Muslim imperialists ruling with great cruelty over and ruthlessly exploiting and periodically mass-murdering a terrorised Christian population… and then there were those native Bulgarians who either sided voluntarily with the imperial occupiers, or else simply *broke* under the cruel pressure of living as Dhimmis: they converted to islam to escape the burden of the jizya ‘protection’ (sic) money; to escape having their children – boys and girls – seized and brutalised and abused, whether as soldiers (janissaries) or as disposable sex slaves in the harems. Either way, the converts were essentially collaborators, joining and identifying with the oppressors. And even Islamophkle wikipedia notes that there were ” many cases of forced individual or mass islamization..”.
Bulgaria only got out from under Muslim rule in 1878; and whatever else has happened since, they have remained a non-Muslim country.
Any Muslims – whether of Turkish or Bulgarian ethnicity – who remained in Bulgaria after 1878, have coexisted, on whatever terms, with the non-Muslim majority, for no longer than 138 years. Hardly ‘centuries’.
And at bottom: Islam is the problem. However syncretic or lax, Muslims in Bulgaria – Turkish, Roma or ethnically Bulgarian – still identify as Muslims and they still have the same Quran and the same Mohammed; and the influence of Saudi Arabia, etc, is only problematic because there is Muslim ground upon which it may fall; what is happening is that *real* Islam in Bulgaria is being *reactivated*, energised, revived.
quota raven says
To Dumbledoresarmy – Thank you for this most instructive lesson in Bulgarian history vis a vis Islam. I know next to nothing about Bulgaria, and your astute comment is much appreciated.
Cheers!
quota raven
Praeceptor Maximus says
“BULGARIA has banned the burka – and warned those who flout the law will be fined £662 and lose their benefits.”
I applaud Bulgaria. This is the best news so far. Muslims cannot hide any more behind the false narrative that their religion is the religion of minority and must be protected. Islam is the second largest religion, barbaric though it is, and as such it must come under scrutiny with respect to its savagery. Behind every woman who wars a niqab or a burka you can bet there is a jihadi in the family. In fact every practicing Muslim is a ticking time bomb.
Praeceptor Maximus says
Sorry. I meant to say wears a niqab, not wars a niqab. I have difficulty seeing what I am typing in grey.
quota raven says
To Praeceptor who complains, ” I have difficulty seeing what I am typing in grey.”
So completely with you on that, Praeceptor! I cannot understand why nearly INVISIBLE light grey is used here, there and elsewhere on the Internet. ‘Sup widdat???
Cheers!
quota raven
BennyA1 says
Bravo to the Hungarian people!!!!. Finally, someone over on that side of the world has “balls” to stand up to the abuse these people have perpetrated on the west. I can only hope that the rest of the world wakes up too.
Baucent says
“The new law states that clothing that conceals the face may not be worn in the institutions of Bulgaria’s central and local administrations, schools, cultural institutions, and places of public recreation, sports and communications.”
This is totally reasonable and should be followed by other democratic countries. Those muslim women who feel they need to hide behind the burqa are clearly not refugees as they adhere to strict orthodox Islam. Refugees don’t flee from socially liberal states. So they should choose, remove the burqa or return to their homeland.
Tom says
A few years back, Minnesota was considering allowing them to wear that piece of subjugation for driver’s license pictures.
I wonder what came of that?
Dom107 says
Yes a little bit of common sense coming in here.I would also ban the wearing of military style uniforms with face covering
JawsV says
I didn’t think Bulgaria allowed Moslems. Too bad.
Cameron says
What is also needed is for something like a transfer of criminal responsibility from the woman wearing face coverings to anyone else who is forcing her to wear it against her better judgment.
If someone threatens another person into commiting a crime then the person making the threats should face even harsher punishments for both making threats against others as well as for the criminal acts of others that they have instigated.
Would that logic work???
Pal says
– burqa
– jihad
– sharia
– caliphate
– kafir
– subjugation
….
Without referring to any religion, all those islam’s essentials should by legally Officially Banned throughout Europe, America, Australia, by Parliaments and Governments.
Paul Clark says
Bulgaria is doing them a favor. Now they don’t have to hid behind clothe because of the shame of being a female, protect the male insecurity of their husband’s sexual insecurities; and, the shame of what their demonic people have done to the innocent of the world.
Also require them to eat some bacon. Supposedly it is the “gateway” to all newly eaters of meat. If they give up their dietary requirement, maybe they will give up some of their other nonsense too and just try being a decent human being. (Jews are an exception here.) Muslims are identified here because most Muslim slaughters houses are notoriously filthy. Also, as is most the bathrooms of their convenience stores and their motels, they own or operate.
Angemon says
Good for Bulfaria. Oh, and “offenders will LOSE their benefits”? Almost makes it seem as if, generally speaking, muslims in Bulgaria are on the dole and welfare – as if they refuse to work or something like that…
Angemon says
“Bulgaria”, not “Bulfaria”
Caliph says
I was hoping Bulfaria was a real country that also banded the burka
Baucent says
It was one of the 112 countries Hillary visited.
quota raven says
to Beaucent – who sez “It was one of the 112 countries Hillary visited.”
Hmm. And was it a profitable trip for the First Lady, er, Senator, er…Secy of State…er, the crook who is running for President?
What a queer world, non?
Cheers!
quota raven
Carolyne says
I Bulfaria the country where Hillary Clinton had to duck from bullets and run to an armored vehicle?
Guest says
Burka’s are hideous anyway.
Carolyne says
Depends on how you feel about women walking around in garbage bags.
Mark A says
Good for the Bulgarians.
It will be interesting to see how Bulgarian courts deal with it.
LR says
While, I am not nearly as ferocious/hateful against all Muslims as some people on here, I sure wish the burqa were at least banned in all Western civilization.
I have not seen anyone in my area in a burqa yet. I hope to god I don’t, it would just be way to freaky.
Caliph says
“… While, I am not nearly as ferocious/hateful against all Muslims as some people on here, I sure wish the burqa were at least banned in all Western civilization. …”
I think you should know that most JW readers are not hateful against Muslims ( who are people ) but are simply opposed to Islam ( which is a supremist ideology with the goal of taking over the world and destroying all other religions and establishing Islam, and the 7th century culture which comes with it as the standard for the world ). It is true that there are many Muslims worthy of being disliked, even hated, because of their behavior, not their belief. How would you feel about importing millions of canibals to your country, and letting them eat your neighbors and friends – would you call those opposed to such a thing “haters”?
If Muslims come to West and assimilate and follow our laws, and get jobs, no one would have any issue. When they come, and go on welfare and work to change our laws without contributing anything to our society you should take issue. More than 80% of Muslims immigrants in Europe are not working – they immigrate to countries which give good welfare – no one should like slackers – if they claim they come to the west for economic opportunity – let them prove it by getting a job. Those who understand Muslims know many immigrants feel they deserve jizya and so they feel the welfare is due them. When you understand the underlying ideological motivation, you will see things differently.
You can take a Muslim out of an Islamic country, but it is very difficult to take the Islamic mentality of of a Muslim.
Musalmaanmasala says
Could not agree with you more caliph
Charli Main says
Blaming Islam is like blaming the gun that fires the bullet that kills someone.
Muslims are entirely to blame because Muslims believe in and practice the tenets of Islam. Even those Muslims that don’t actually murder people support those who do, financially, morally and politically.
Claiming that its Islam and not Muslims, is like saying its not the Nazis, its all the fault of Mein Kamph.
quota raven says
Good point, well made, Charli. Appreciated.
Cheers!
quota raven
Caliph says
In the west people often “believe” one thing and do another – because the west is civilized and tolerant and by and large believe in the rule of law. often people think someone that does _____ deserves to die, but, we as civilized people don’t take matters into our own hands. Muslims, especially in foreign countries form mobs and inflict punishment/death based on rumors and lies – look at Pakistan and all the Christians killed there “just because” why? And why government lets them get away with it?
In USA you can believe anything you want, you can be communist, Nazi, KKK, worship Satan, etc. BUT when your belief drives you to harm others, that’s another matter.
What makes a pedophile “bad”? The fact that God made them to be attracted to children, OR that they abuse children?
What makes homosexuality “bad” ( if you believe it is bad )
The fact that God made them attracted to the same sex, or that they engage in such behavior?
What makes a Muslim bad? A combination of a bad belief coupled with a bad behavior. islam cannot separate its bad parts from any part that might be good and still be Islam – therefore the whole doctrine is “bad”
dumbledoresarmy says
You wrote – “I have not seen anyone in my area in a burqa yet.”
I neither. I live in an area of a large Aussie city that does not, as yet, have very many Muslims around. Nevertheless.. in the local shopping centre (aka ‘mall’ in American English), though I have not seen anyone in the burqa, I *have* seen, from time to time, not a few women in the niqab – the face-veil that masks all of the face except for a slit through which the eyes peer like some small animal looking out from a crack in the rocks.
And *that* is freaky enough.
Doubly so because I *don’t* see what the naive and uninformed see – “quaint ethnic costume” – but, rather, I see a declaration of war, and a not-so-veiled threat to every non-masked female in the vicinity. A threat to *me*. To my daughters. To their friends who walk free with unveiled faces and uncovered hair.
The hijab – the Slave Hood or Head-Bag, that leaves the face visible, but conceals all hair, the ears, the neck – is not so openly intimidating, because of mimicking the ‘look’ of a nun’s wimple; but when I see a woman in it I see exactly the same basic signal as the niqab and burqa. I see something just as threatening as would be the open wearing of a swastika armband or the KKK hood and robe. Indeed, more intimidating than would be, today, the public declaration of neonazi or of KKK sympathy and membership, because *those* groups today don’t have anything like the membership numbers and political base (the OIC has 57 member states) and financial clout (thanks to petrodollars; trillions of petrodollars) of the transnational Ummah, or Mohammedan mob.
Carolyne says
I saw a woman in Kroger’s wearing a head covering and a thin veil across her nose and the bottom part of her face. I thought she was auditioning for “Desert Song.”
Ren says
KUDOS Bulgaria!
Musalmaanmasala says
Kudos to Bulgaria for banning the face covering “in your face” veil worn by muslim women.
Many are the crimes committed by muslims not only women but men too who wear the all encompassing chador or burkha to commit crimes.
In India muslim womena and men have been caught red handed doing so and many have escaped because CCTV cameras could not distinguish their features.
Congratulations to France, Netherlands and Belgium too for banning this practice which demeans women (even though muslim females are TAUGHT to say they are doing it “out of choice”) while giving their men the freedom to do and dress anyway they want.
David says
I’m not sure about the laws in every state, but I do know that the huge muslum Crime Syndicates (CAIR?) are always trying to Sue in Federal Court any state DMV that makes any fuss about license photos with face covered by satanic (islamic) mask or “Head Sack”.
I say immediate deportation is the only answer. Stop any and all welfare benefits. Any criminals caught should serve out their sentences in labor camps. So a portion of the costs of Prison might be recovered. Then deport.
dumbledoresarmy says
If anyone wants to know why the Bulgarians are legislating to try to limit the power and the spread of Islam within their country, they should look no further than the historic news report that is reproduced *here*.
http://www.attackingthedevil.co.uk/related/macgahan.php
Just in case the link has ‘died’, I will provide the title, which should make it possible to google it up.
The Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria: Horrible Scenes at Batak
J. A. MacGahan (The Daily News, August 22, 1876), pp.5-6
The Turkish Muslims in the 1870s conducted *huge* pogroms against the Dhimmi Bulgarian Christians.
Excerpt:
“…As we approached Batak out attention was drawn to some dogs on a slope overlooking the town. We turned aside from the road, and passing over the debris of two or three walls and through several gardens, urged our horses up the ascent toward the dogs.
“They barked at us in an angry manner, and then ran off into the adjoining fields. I observed nothing peculiar as we mounted until my horse stumbled, when looking down I perceived he had stepped on a human skull partly hid among the grass.
“It was quite hard and dry, and might, to all appearances, have been there two or three years, so well had the dogs done their work. A few steps further there was another and part of a skeleton, likewise, white and dry.
“As we ascended, bones, skulls, and skeletons became more frequent, but here they had not been picked so clean, for there were fragments of half dry, half putrid flesh attached to them.
“At last we came to a little plateau or shelf on the hillside, where the ground was nearly level, with the exception of a little indentation, where the head of a hollow broke through.
“We rode toward this with the intention of crossing it, but all suddenly drew reign with an exclamation of horror, for right before us, almost beneath our horses’ feet, was a sight that made us shudder.
“It was a heap of skulls, intermingled with bones from all parts of the human body, skeletons nearly entire and rotting, clothing, human hair and putrid flesh lying there in one foul heap, around which the grass was growing luxuriantly. It emitted a sickening odour, like that of a dead horse, and it was here that the dogs had been seeking a hasty repast when our untimely approach interrupted them.
“In the midst of this heap, I could distinguish the slight skeleton form, still enclosed in a chemise, the skull wrapped about with a coloured handkerchief, and the bony ankles encased in the embroidered footless stockings worn by Bulgarian girls.
“We looked about us. The ground was strewed with bones in every direction, where the dogs had carried them off to gnaw them at their leisure.
“At the distance of a hundred yards beneath us lay the town. As seen from our standpoint, it reminded one somewhat of the ruins of Herculaneum and Pompeii .
“There was not a roof left, not a whole wall standing; all was a mass of ruins, from which arose as we listened a low plaintive wail, like the “keening” of the Irish over their dead, that filled the little valley and gave it voice.
“We had the explanation of thin curious sound when we afterwards descended into the village.
“We looked again at the heap of skulls and skeletons before us, and we observed that they were all small and that the articles of clothing intermingled with them and lying about were all women’s apparel. These, then, were all women and girls.
“From my saddle I counted about a hundred skulls, not including those that were hidden beneath the others in the ghastly heap nor those that were scattered far and wide through the fields.
“The skulls were nearly all separated from the rest of the bones – the skeletons were nearly all headless. These women had all been beheaded.”…
“…A little further on we came to an object that filled us with pity and horror. It was the skeleton of a young girl not more than fifteen lying by the roadside, and partly covered with the debris of a fallen wall. It was still clothed in a chemise; the ankles were enclosed in footless stockings, but the little feet, from which the shoes had been taken, were naked, and owing to the fact that the flesh had dried instead of decomposing were nearly perfect.
“There was a large gash in the skull, to which a mass of rich brown hair, nearly a yard long, still clung, trailing in the dust. It is to be remarked that all the skeletons found here were dressed in a chemise only, and this poor child had evidently been stripped to her chemise, partly in the search for money and jewels, partly out of mere brutality, and afterwards killed.
“We have tallied with many women who had passed through all parts of the ordeal but the last, and the procedure seems to have been, as follows:
“They would seize a woman, strip her carefully to her chemise, laying aside articles of clothing that wore valuable, with any ornaments and jewels she might have about her.
“**Then as many of them as cared would violate her, and the last man would kill her or not as the humour took him.** [ my emphasis – dda].
More horror (all of it perfectly familiar to those of us who have heard the accounts given by Yazidis and by Assyrian Christians who have been attacked by Islamic State, and the accounts given by Christian villagers in northern Nigeria – dd).
“The number of children killed in these massacres is something enormous.
“They were often spitted on bayonets, and we have several stories from eye-witnesses who saw the little babes carried about the streets, both here and at Olluk-Kui, on the points of bayonets.
“The reason is simple.
“When a Mohammedan has killed a certain number of infidels he is sure of Paradise , no matter what his sins may be. Mahomet probably in tended that only armed men should count, but the ordinary Mussulman takes the precept in its broader acceptation, and counts women and children as well.
“The advantage of killing children is that it can be done without danger, and that a child counts for as much as an armed man.
“Here in Batak the Bashi-Bazouks, in order to swell the count, ripped open pregnant women, and killed the unborn infants.
“As we approached the middle of the town, bones, skeletons, and skulls became more numerous. There was not a house beneath the ruins of which we did not perceive human remains, and the street besides was strewn with them….”.
dumbledoresarmy says
And yet more, from McGahan’s account of the aftermath of just one Muslim mass-murder spree in just one Christian Bulgarian town, in 1876 (and there were many, many, many others; and if one reads Andrew Bostom’s Legacy of Jihad, one will encounter an endless litany of similar or even worse horrors, at every place and in every period where Muslims have had the power to kill, rob and rape non-Muslims at will; what was done to the Bulgarian Christians at Batak and elsewhere in that time, is EXACTLY what was done by Muslim Turks and Muslim Arabs and Muslim Kurds to Armenian and Assyrian Christians in the 1890s and in the early 20th century.
“…And now we begin to approach the church and the schoolhouse.
“The ground is covered here with skeletons, to which are clinging articles of clothing and bits of putrid flesh; the air is heavy with a faint sickening odour, that grows stronger as we advance. It is beginning to be horrible.
“The school is on one side of the road, the church on the other.
“The schoolhouse, to judge by the walls that are in part standing, was a fine large building, capable of accommodating two or three hundred children.
“Beneath the stones and rubbish that cover the floor to the height of several feet, are the bones and ashes of two hundred women and children burnt alive between those four walls.
“Just beside the school house is a broad shallow pit.
“Here were buried a hundred bodies two weeks after the massacre.
“But the dogs uncovered them in part. The water flowed in, and now it lies there a horrid cesspool, with human remains floating about or lying half exposed in the mud.
“Nearby, on the bunks of the little stream that runs through the village, is a sawmill. The wheel-pit beneath is full of dead bodies floating in the water.
” The banks of this stream were at one time literally covered with corpses of men and women, young girls and children, that lay there festering in the sun, and eaten by dogs. But the pitiful sky rained down a torrent upon them, and the little stream swelled and rose up and carried the bodies away, and strewed them far down its grassy banks, through its narrow gorges and dark defiles beneath the thick underbrush and the shady woods as far as Pestera, and even Tatar Buzardjik, forty miles distant.
“We entered the churchyard, but the odour here became so bad that it was almost impossible to proceed.
“We take a handful of tobacco, and hold it to our noses while we continue our investigation.
“The church was not a very large one, and it was surrounded by a low stone wall, enclosing a small churchyard about fifty yards wide by seventy-five long.
“At first we perceive nothing in particular, and the stench was so great that we scarcely care to look about us, but we see that the place is heaped up with stones and rubbish to the height of five or six feet above the level of the street, and upon inspection we discover that what appeared to be a mass of stones and rubbish is in reality an immense heap of human bodies covered over with a thin layer of stones.
“The whole of the little churchyard is heaped up with them to the depth of three or four feet, and it is from here that the fearful odour comes.
“Some weeks after the massacre, orders were sent to bury the dead.
“But the stench at that time had become so deadly that it was impossible to execute the order, or even to remain in the neighbourhood of the village.
“The men sent to perform the work contented themselves with burying a few bodies, throwing a little earth over others as they lay, and here in the churchyard they had tried to cover this immense heap of festering humanity by throwing in stones and rubbish over the walls, without daring to enter.
“They had only partially succeeded. The dogs had been at work there since, and now could be seen projecting from this monster grave, heads, arms, legs, feet, and hands, in horrid confusion.
“We were told there were three thousand people lying here in this little churchyard alone, and we could well believe it. It was a fearful sight — a sight to haunt one through life.
“There were little curly heads there in that festering mass, crushed down by heavy stones; little feet not as long as your finger on which the flesh was dried hard, by the ardent heat before it had time to decompose; little baby hands stretched out as if for help; babes that had died wondering at the bright gleam of sabres and the red hands of the fierce-eyed men who wielded them; children who had died shrinking with fright and terror; young girls who had died weeping and sobbing and begging for mercy; mothers who died trying to shield their little ones with their own weak bodies, all lying there together, festering in one horrid mass.
“They are silent enough now. There are no tears nor cries, no weeping, no shrieks of terror, nor prayers for mercy.
“The harvests are rotting in the fields, and the reapers are rotting here in the churchyard.
“We looked into the church which had been blackened by the burning of the woodwork, but not destroyed, nor even much injured. It was a low building with a low roof, supported by heavy irregular arches, that as we looked in seemed scarcely high enough for a tall man to stand under.
“What we saw there was too frightful for more than a hasty glance.
“An immense number of bodies had been partly burnt there and the charred and blackened remains, that seemed to fill it half way up to the low dark arches and make them lower and darker still, were lying in a state of putrefaction too frightful to look upon.
” I had never imagined anything so horrible. We all turned away sick and faint, and staggered out of the fearful pest house glad to get into the street again.
“We walked about the place and saw the same things repeated over and over a hundred times. Skeletons of men with the clothing and flesh still hanging to and rotting together; skulls of women, with the hair dragging in the dust, bones of children and of infants everywhere.
“Here they show us a house where twenty people were burned alive; there another where a dozen girls had taken refuge, and been slaughtered to the last one, as their bones amply testified. Everywhere horrors upon horrors.”…
“…Of the eight or nine thousand people who made up the population of the place, there are only twelve or fifteen hundred left,…”.
“We asked about the skulls and bones we had seen up on the hill upon first arriving in the village where the dogs had barked at us.
“These we were told were the bones of about two hundred young girls, who had first been captured and particularly reserved for a worse fate than death.
“They had been kept till the last; they had been in the hands of their captors for several days — for the burning and the pillaging had not all been accomplished in a single day — and during this time they had suffered all it was possible that poor weak trembling girls could suffer at the hands of brutal savages.
“Then, when the town had been pillaged and burnt, when all their friends had been slaughtered, these poor young things, whose very wrongs should have insured them safety, whoso very outrages should have insured them protection, were taken, in the broad light of day, beneath the smiling canopy of heaven, coolly beheaded, then thrown in a heap there, and left to rot.”.
If the non-Muslim Bulgarians were to expel from Bulgaria every single last person who currently identifies as a Muslim, and raze to the ground every single mosque that, financed by petrodollars, the Saudi-funded dawa artists and fomenters of jihad have been causing to pop up like mushrooms all over the country, it would be the best way in which they could be sure that horrors such as were perpetrated at Batak will never happen again.
Banning the burka is not sufficient.
There is absolutely not one scintilla of reason why Muslims should be living in Bulgaria, given that Muslims will never, never, never own up to the mass murders and other atrocities that Muslims – perfectly orthodox Muslims – committed against indigenous Bulgarian Christians, in the 1870s, nor ever recognise that those mass murders, rapes and robberies were EVIL. Islam has not changed. The teachings have not changed. Muslims still dream of ruling the whole wide world and forcing everyone who will not Submit, to become a terrorised dhimmi near-slave, or die.
Charli Main says
and this is the scum, that the political elites of the European Union are fighting desperately to admit into CHRISTIAN ( ????) Europe.
Pal says
To dumbledoresarmy, in support:
There is a moral from history that says Peoples never learn from history.
However, there is another one, that says Once bitten, twice shy.
Obviously, only Trippe Pairs’2015 in a week could bring some change in Western countries.
Bulgarians, similar to Greeks and Serbians and more, are from those who have sensed islam’s slavery directly through their skins.
In 1841, after a rebellion in today’s Bulgarian-Serbian border lands, 20,000 were decapitated and a pyramid erected out of their sculls to scare future unrest and glorify muslim soldiers, with similar pyramids existing in Greece earlier, too:
https://books.google.bg/books/about/Roumania.html?id=ZZ1UAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y.
In 1086, after the battle of Sagrajas, Spain, bordering today’s Portugal, 24,000 Castilian soldiers were decapitated and a “minaret” built out of their headless bodies piled up for a muslim muezzins to stand atop and sing their mantras of the merciful Allah:
https://www.amazon.com/Jihad-West-Muslim-Conquests-Centuries/dp/1573922471.
At the time, tens of thousands of heads rolled, and no one hesitated to call it islam.
Today, ten heads roll, and we already invented the “radical” “wolf” theory.
Carolyne says
Although this report is from the late 19th century, the same is happening now in the middle east, where Obama’s “JV” team have overtaken areas. It is no longer apparent which side we are on in Syria.
Pal says
“Jihad” is eternal idea.
Jihad and all other islam doctrines are made eternal by its doctrines of “bidah”, “perfectness” and more.
You may not change something which is perfect and is an irrefutable “truth”.
Muslim theology knows that very well.
No matter IX, XIX, or XXIX (God Forbid!) century.
“Islam is the perfect religion”:
http://www.ediscoverislam.com/the-religion-of-islam/islam-the-perfect-religion
“Bidah”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bid%E2%80%98ah
Matthieu Baudin says
Once again a Central European Country takes modest and rational steps to keep their heads above the rising water. With time this collection of nations, geographically in the heart of Europe, will become the heart of the continent in an emotive and spiritual sense, as the countries of the western rim struggle to salvage their identity, and watch their day to security and happiness drain away, suffering a type of death by a thousand cuts, brought on by incessant Jihad activity.
Matthieu Baudin says
(corrected – fourth line)
Once again a Central European Country takes modest and rational steps to keep their heads above the rising water. With time this collection of nations, geographically in the heart of Europe, will become the heart of the continent in an emotive and spiritual sense, as the countries of the western rim struggle to salvage their identity, and watch their day to day security and happiness drain away, suffering a type of death by a thousand cuts, brought on by incessant Jihad activity.
Pal says
Noteworthy: Ban in Bulgaria “applies not only to Bulgarian citizens but also to anyone temporarily in the country”.
If you visit your friends for a day in Bulgaria or you visit Black Sea seaside for a week of sunbathing you may never be wrapped in that islamic garment, i.e., “burkini” uniforms for foreigners are also included.
http://bulgariatravel.org/en/object/16/albena
Khushi says
Good job, Bulgaria.
Now i hope the other European countries follow suit.