Taha Ghayyur, a Toronto Muslim activist and a board member of DawaNet, believes that the Islamic Law can be gradually implemented in North America.
Ghayyur introduces himself – as all stealth jihadists do – as a harmless, thoughtful individual:
“I am a writer, public speaker, community organizer, and marketing consultant. I work as Development Manager with Sound Vision and volunteer my time with DawaNet projects in various capacities.
Canada, like the US and other Western democracies, has been infiltrated by mainstream Muslim groups, leaders, speakers, imams, etc. who appear to be benign, but who are anti-West and anti-Israel, and habe the goal of doing dawah for the ultimate purpose of Sharia conquest.
In an article originally published by Young Muslims website and entitled “Understanding Punishment in Shariah [Islamic Law], Taha Ghayyur explained the rationale behind the harsh punishments in Islam (execution, stoning, cutting off thieves’ hands etc.) and argued that the Islamic Law (Shariah) can be implemented in North America.
Specifically troubling was that Ghayyur’s message was published for a Muslim youth audience.
“It is certainly possible to apply Shariah in the North American society”, by Jonathan D. Halevi, CiJ News, October 14, 2016:
Taha Ghayyur, a Toronto Muslim activist and a board member of DawaNet, believes that the Islamic Law can be gradually implemented in North America.
Ghayyur introduces himself as follows:
“I am a writer, public speaker, community organizer, and marketing consultant. I work as Development Manager with Sound Vision and volunteer my time with DawaNet projects in various capacities. I got involved with MuslimFest in its early years.”
Dawanet is a grass roots organization striving among other things:
- “to create effective networks of communication and media to keep the Muslim community informed and connected”
- “to share and relate the message of Islam with beauty, wisdom, and respect using both traditional and modern means of communication”
- “to offer courses, workshops, and study circles on Islamic sciences and disciplines in the light of Islamic sources (text) and our environment (context), to develop a healthy Muslim identity and citizenship
- “to influence public opinion about social justice issues through artistic expression and media participation”
DawaNet has applied for registered charity status and our application is still being processed. Some of DawaNet’s other community projects include:
- TorontoMuslims.com: A web portal for the GTA’s Muslims.
- Sharing Islam: Regular booths at major malls across GTA, such as SquareOne.
- Understanding Islam Academy: Originating in 2012, Understanding Islam Academy (UIA), a flagship project of DawaNet, is dedicated to making Islamic education accessible, affordable and relevant.
- Canada Zakat – The welfare arm of DawaNet
- MYSpirit – Muslim Youth (MY) Spirit is a movement to engage, educate, and empower young Muslims of Canada through education, art, media, recreation, and civic engagement.
- MuslimFest – Launched in 2004, MuslimFest is a joint initiative of DawaNet, Young Muslims Canada, and Sound Vision, which organizes in Mississauga, Ont. an annual festival to celebrates Muslim arts, education, entrepreneurship and entertainment.
Sound Vision Canada presents itself as “a pioneer in quality Islamic education and entertainment products and programs for North American Muslims.”
Young Muslims (YM) presents itself as “an organization dedicated to addressing the vital roles the Muslim youth should play in North America” and counteracting the modern “temptations” by “challenging the youth to take the best of all paths in both this world and in the Hereafter” and encouraging Muslim youths to feel “comfortable with their Islamic identity, spirituality, and heritage.”
In an article originally published by Young Muslims website and entitled “Understanding Punishment in Shariah [Islamic Law], Taha Ghayyur explained the rationale behind the harsh punishments in Islam (execution, stoning, cutting off thieves’ hands etc.) and argued that the Islamic Law (Shariah) can be implemented in North America.
The following are excerpts from Ghayyur’s article:
“Abdur-Rahman Doi, in his encyclopedic work Shari’ah: The Islamic Law, suggests that only a total of seven scenarios exist in which Hud [fixed] penalties are awarded in the Islamic law; among the Hud crimes are intentional murder, theft, adultery, and highway robbery.
“Not surprisingly, it is this portion of the Islamic law that often makes headlines in the media.
“According to the Muslim jurists, the purpose of Hud [fixed] punishments is educative, preventive, and, mainly deterrent.
“Punishments are thus designed to keep the sense of justice alive in the community by a public repudiation of the acts violating the limits set by God.
“They are expected to build up in the society a deep feeling of abhorrence for transgression against fellow human beings, and therefore against God – a transgression which, according to the Quran, is the root cause of all disorders and corruption in human life…
“The Hud [fixed] punishment prescribed by the Quran for a theft is to cut off the thief’s hand [under certain and strict conditions]…
“Moreover, one wonders if Shariah can be practically implemented in our contemporary North American context…
“The principles of Shariah are universal and are not bound by the limitations of time and culture.
“It is certainly possible to apply Shariah in the North American society only if three conditions are fulfilled:
- One, when an environment is developed, provisioned with preventative measures, that is conductive to a just and productive lifestyle, which is often not compatible with a consumer lifestyle.
- Two, if the Shariah laws are implemented gradually, accompanied by continuous public education and training on the importance of justice, freedom, and one’s purpose on this earth, the way it was revealed and practiced, as a strategy of pre-crime social reform, over a period of twenty three years at the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the first generation of Muslims.
- Three, if the punishments in the Shariah are given their due place, only to be used as a last resort, and not to be practiced in isolation from the other major objectives of the Shariah.
“If a comprehensive approach to Shariah is not adopted then one may expect to witness horrific images of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text, the likes of which we have witnessed in recent times.
Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, sent a video message greeting the organizers of the MuslimFest in Mississauga in summer 2016, including DawaNet, Sound Vision and Young Muslims:
“Hello everyone. Welcome to the MuslimFest 2016.
“Thank you to DawaNet, Young Muslim Canada, Festive Currents and Sound Vision who put in so much effort to organize this weekend’s festival.
“Today and tomorrow we celebrate the best in Muslim art and culture with artists from Canada and around the world…….

Gary says
Oh how cute. What could go wrong…..
Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand.
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad’s words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
Islamic Fascist Political Death Cult says
In Islam their is no such thing as Innocent until proven guilty, its just off with your hands for theft, or stone the Adulteress, where are her 4 male witnesses to prove she didnt have sex out of marriage?
bernie says
Good points, but you haven’t even mentioned that Christians and Jews are to be treated as second- or third-class “dhimmi” citizens, and must pay an extortionistic jizyah tax which is 3-4 times that which a Muslim citizen must pay. Also, a Muslim’s word must always trump that of a Christian or Jew. Moreover, non-Muslims of non-Abrahamic faiths (such as Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Shintoists, Confucianists, etc. and also open atheists) barely have any rights at all, and may even be put to death if they do not wish to be forcibly converted to Islam.
Jaem says
Sadly meat that has been sacrificed to Allah, “Halahl” is already being deemed a emerging market for meat processors. It is sold in most grocery stores in Canada but Canadians do not know that it is sacrificial meat. Ignorance and lack of knowledge about Sharia and Islam is one of the best ways for deceptive ideologies to gain a foot hold.
somehistory says
He’s a “community organizer”.
Where oh, where, have we seen and heard that before? When did we see and hear of it, and what does it mean?
Hopefully, prayerfully, Christ will return and clean the earth of all of the unholy, unlawful, conduct of the demons and practiced by satan’s children…soon.
john spielman says
this dolt should consider that sharia courts (for muslims only and similar to Jewish family courts) were ALMOST introduced in Ontario in the 1990s except that it was stopped by muslim WOMEN who knew that they would be screwed by male inheritance laws which are a part of sharia law!
The Canadian govt had mandated that all such sharia family courts would be voluntary- both parties, and MUST adhere to Canadian law!
the problem is that muslims MUST LIE to nonmuslims and sharia law whether inheritance /family matters or criminal law are NOT COMPATIBLE with English common law on which the USA and Canada ( excpt Quebec )are based!
gravenimage says
It is not Jewish courts that are sentencing victims to amputation and stoning.
Michael Copeland says
CODESPEAK
“an environment is developed, provisioned with preventative measures, that is conductive to a just and productive lifestyle, … not compatible with a consumer lifestyle.”
TRANSLATION
A no-go zone, a muslim enclave, is carved out (by force), where Islamic threats and menaces keep the muslim inhabitants in a state of submission, facilitating the IMPOSITION of Sharia (the “just and productive lifestyle”) which is NOT COMPATIBLE with Western law.
After a while one recognises the snake oil.
Sheykh Yer Weeni says
CODESPEAK, I got that one, too! “when an environment is developed, provisioned with preventative measures, that is conductive to a just and productive lifestyle, which is often not compatible with a consumer lifestyle.”
In other words, when Kafir no-go zones are established. We are really, really, close to the edge, aren’t we?
May we be strong to stand when the time comes, for Liberty.
gravenimage says
Very true.
Scott says
I immediately had that jump out at me too. his taqiyya intro and the way he hopes.to implement his no go shar’ia zones is akin to the boiling a frog analogy, starting with nice warm comfortable water. the menacing starts when women try to take off those “women’s choice” Burma’s and they find out they lied …it was never a choice or a “fashion” they wear one year and not another though that’s how the deceivers sell it …very clever. As if the burka-kinis were about women’s choice and freedom! !??? Try taking off that veil once you tell them it’s okay to require it as they see fit. And oh yes, be assured ladies that it won’t be about women’s ability to choose. it never was!
PJG says
“,..not compatible with a consumer lifestyle.”
No? But perhaps “compatible” with the economic fruits of the capitalist system which produces the disdained “consumer lifestyle”.
And this fruit can be used as jizya, or, that is, the means to an Islamic-style consumer lifestyle.
Would this character really want to deny his people the joys of spending money others have earned?
Allan says
Islam is vulnerable to many of the criticisms which have been used to undermine confidence in Judaism and Christianity. Sometimes these religions share the exact same vulnerability. A good example is the risible doctrine of bodily ascension of Jesus into heaven, which Islam borrowed rather crassly from Christianity. Or perhaps we should say that Islam is the remnant of a Christian sect which preserved the doctrine of ascension after ridding itself of original sin, the Trinity, and the divinity of Jesus. Whatever its origins, however, Islam will be neutered and pacified by wrecking faith and making Islamic doctrine an object of ridicule, mockery, and satire which Islamic leaders and scholars cannot avoid.
gravenimage says
Brutal Shari’ah law is not a part of Christianity, whatever you might think.
Ken Winokur says
Good!
Michael Copeland says
Beware the word “implement”: it sounds so anodyne and harmless.
Canadian laws, after they have been passed by Parliament, are indeed implemented.
Sharia is incompatible with Canadian law, and cannot be passed by Parliament.
Sharia is held by Islam to be superior to “man-made” law and to override it.
Sharia does not require anything as tiresome as debate in Parliament or a statute.
To “implement Sharia” can thus ONLY mean to “impose Sharia by force”.
Gary says
by force?! Heavens no!
….or not: • Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
ele says
Forget about the Quran Research Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri Reliance of the Traveller, a classic manuel of Islamic Sacred law. c
Michael Copeland says
“Reliance of the Traveller” is available as a free download:
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/the-reliance-of-the-traveller.pdf
Greyhound Fancier says
Thanks – this is much appreciated.
dante says
“Muslim art and culture.” Yeah right, as if there were such a thing.
Scott says
Koran: G”abriel (the archangel) will not enter a house where there is an image or a dog.”
There goes dogs and art in one quick line from the big guy himself: allah. Whenever I read Muslim art and culture I laugh as well …what a lie. Music, film, painting, drama? Nope, Iran doesn’t like that music stuff…especially. Bunch of Percy bochi boy uptight freaks need a drink!
Jaladhi says
Where ever Muslims go, there is trouble! The West is too stupid to understand it in their illusion of morality of treating every religion the same.
Cretius says
Damn all who work to subvert western democracies!
abad says
Not when Trump is elected president.
Hillary will simply continue to violate the Constitution just as Hussein O has done.
Kenneth T Tellis says
Then let every Muslim Country convert to Christianity first and force all Muslims to eat Pork and byproducts . That is the equivalent of sharia in Christian lands. And no more Allah hu Akbar in public places.
gravenimage says
The morality of Christianity is not about eating pork products. I’m a vegetarian, and would be ousted under your scheme–as would observant Jews.
I object to the violence and supremacy of pious Muslims–I don’t care whether they eat pork rinds or not.
Wellington says
Actually, I prefer something like ISIS to this dude since slow jihad temporarily hides many of the freedom-crushing iniquities of Islam while fast jihad does not.
Yes indeed, I prefer Islam straight, no chaser.
gravenimage says
As you know, Muslims only use stealth Jihad when they feel they are weak–when they are emboldened, the mask comes off.
Actually, the mask is half off this Muslim thug, as well–he is not pretending that Shari’ah is just about prayer and wu’du.
Wellington says
I like to think, gravenimage, that the mask is half off Islam in general. More and more regular folks in the West are “getting” Islam though the wretched Western elites keep doubling down here So, call me a cautious or even skeptical optimist in this regard.
gravenimage says
I very much agree, Wellington.
bleeps says
[…]“to influence public opinion about social justice issues through artistic expression”
Anyone thought of drawing Mo-ham-med making justice?!
underbed cat says
I had to chuckle on that comment bleep, how true…disinformation at it’s best to say they support social justice….only the sharia kind, and that would not be so tolerant.
mortimer says
The Canadian constitution is virtually unchangeable. The formula of amendment will stop Sharia law from being adopted since Sharia is against the Charter of Rights.
BLC says
Here’s hoping you’re right. The last thing Canada needs is Sharia Law.
gravenimage says
I hope so, Mortimer.
Mockingjay says
God, these islamist types are so divorced from reality.
They constantly overestimate themselves and UNDER-estimate the resistance of the West to their dark-age system of morality.
They feel emboldened because the poltical left in most Western societies has enabled their devious plans for a few decades now. This has made them think everything will continue like it has so far. They could not be more wrong.
I’m not optimistic when it comes to the loss of life Western nations will suffer because of this infestation of islamists the left has allowed to develop.
But I am however quite optimistic in the sense that I don’t believe for a SECOND that the citizens of the West will submit to the islamic religion or rule – EVER.
Like I said – These types have really no idea how much Western people love their freedom(s).
They have no concept whatsoever of how freedom is a tremendous spiritual force for the people of the West.
– Many of these people might not even realize it themselves at this point. But they will surely do once someone is seriously trying to take it away from them.
Honestly – the West is not weak. It just appears so to these islamists. Don’t they know how very dangerous and silly it is to underestimate an opponent? I think they really don’t. They suffer from near psychotic self-aggrandizement, a belief of being invincible, based in the religious delusion they call islam.
They will fail.
katherine says
I’ll believe all that IF Trump gets the support of these intelligent voters next month. The Muslim Trojan still seems to be very popular at the moment – despite her intention to mangle the Bill of Rights – because she had always defended the Bill, whatever he does.
Eric Jones says
Yes Mockingjay the islamist will ultamely fail. In the mean time we have so many Western leadres and press that have their head in the sand regarding the islamic threat. Obama, Hillary, Merkel, Treadue and Hollande are facilatating the islamist.
Unfortunaley the general public does not have the same level of awareness as those of us who follow Jihad Watch and post comments here. At this very moment Obama is willing to risk war with Russia to save ISIS from defeat in Syria. The media and the publc are paying no attention. The best we can do is encourage people we know to follow Rober Spencer and check out Jihad watch.
Eric
Adrian says
Complete crap taqiyya… Taha Ghayyur says the usual euphemisms: “introduced gradually” and ominously enough, says the brutal punishments of Sharia are “only a last resort”… huh???
More smoke and mirrors… but the worst is at the end: a not-so-veiled threat:
“If a comprehensive approach to Shariah is not adopted then one may expect to witness horrific images of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text, the likes of which we have witnessed in recent times.” — in other words, if u don’t introduce Sharia gradually, be prepared for the full treatment!!
Concerned in Calgary says
I wondered when someone would highlight the blatant threat at the end of Taha Ghayyur’s diatribe of our culture.
How is it that this wolf in our midst can openly threaten our democratic rule of law and not be charged with treason? Why doesn’t anyone with authority pay a visit to this subversive and march him straight to the nearest middle east bound aircraft with a one-way ticket?
Canada may not be as far down the road to Shariah as a few European countries are right now, but, God help us, we are not far behind with this individual on our soil.
vicki says
One simple way to fight Islam!!! Please google this petition and sign!!
Change Ordinance 8-15-7 City of North Chicago to allow American Mini pigs as pets
citycat says
“limits set by God”
take your Gods, every last one, and shove them.
Paul Clark says
Taha, news for you! I would rather be stabbed a dozen times in the cranium with an rusty ice pick than be
fast fed or slow fed demonic nonsense by wicked, evil, deceptive Muslim like you. If I am alive, we will battle.
David says
Yes INDEED!
Savages against Christians yet again!
Paul Clark says
citycat
Thousands of years ago Moses described men like you as fools. Not much has changed for heathen, pagans like you: “Once a fool, always a fool.”
gravenimage says
Paul, citycat is *standing against Shari’ah law*. Even if you disagree with him on matters of faith, surely you don’t consider opposing amputation and stonings to be foolish?
BLC says
I have never seen Muslims do anything to fit into Western society. I have never seen Muslims do anything charitable to benefit communities as a whole, i.e. all citizens, not just their own Muslim groups. I have never seen Muslims do anything to benefit their new Western homeland. All I have ever seen them do is try to advance the cause of Islam.
David says
When the “Sharia Police” show up, at my door, trying to force their Satanic rules on me OR my family, I will see them for the Criminals they are, and defend myself accordingly.
As will millions of my fellow Citizens. Thank God for the Constitution and our second amendment rights.
zub says
They should rename Muslim-Fest to Muslim-InFest
gravenimage says
Canada: Muslim activist says Sharia can be gradually implemented in North America
In an article originally published by Young Muslims website and entitled “Understanding Punishment in Shariah [Islamic Law], Taha Ghayyur explained the rationale behind the harsh punishments in Islam (execution, stoning, cutting off thieves’ hands etc.) and argued that the Islamic Law (Shariah) can be implemented in North America.
…………………………
This is the aim of every pious Muslim, violent Jihadist or not: the submission of everyone to Islam, and the imposition of brutal Shari’ah law.
And note: Ghayyur is not even pretending that Shari’ah is anything other than barbaric–he goes right to the most horrific punishments of Islam: amputation for petty theft and stoning for “Zina”.
If Taha Ghayyur has his way, he will be stoning rape victims to death right in Nathan Phillips Square. *Ugh*.
davej says
Gradually, gradually, gradually comes the stealth Jihad.
Look at all the organizations – they are quite passionate – about only one thing – Islamic law for everyone.
Like it or not.
No Fear says
The person who declares that they wish to implement Sharia is simply declaring themselves as the political enemy of every non-muslim. I will fight to the death any attempt at Sharia-ization of my country.
Buford says
This is exactly why Everybody in the Western world better wake up & soon these demonic monsters have 1 goal world domination using that Phony Quran & Sharia Law.
Frank Courtney says
“If a comprehensive approach to Shariah is not adopted then one may expect to witness horrific images of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text, the likes of which we have witnessed in recent times.”
Meaning that if Sharia is not adopted we will kill those who resist it in the most horrific ways possible.
This is the classic combination of stealth and violent jihad. This is how Islam has spread its greasy, abhorrent, murderous tentacles across the world for the last 1400 years.
The nuclear destruction of Mecca will inevitably be the only way to stop it, the solution that ended WWII with Japan. The current politicians in the West would not have the will to take the necessary action.
Tjhawk says
The nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused a cessation of fighting. What really ended the war was when we made the Emporer of Japan announce to his people that he was only a human being, and not a deity. This removed the foundation for the Japanese supremacism that fueled their fanatical expansionism.
Mohammed needs to be bombed with ridicule, satire, derision, etc.. This will be dangèrous, but it will remove the foundation of Islamic supremacism far better than bombing a mosque or nuking Mecca.
That’s why I was so disappointed when three idiots from my state plotted to bomb a Somali housing project in Garden City. That only strengthens the cause of jihad.
Frank Courtney says
I think it will need both. Destroying Mecca would prove to Muslims that “Allah” could not protect the Kabaa and is therefore powerless or indeed non-existent. This realisation will destroy the faith. We should not be reluctant to suggest this. Note that I was not proposing that mosques, madrasses, or Muslims should be physically attacked. You may have erroneously thought that I was. Ridicule, satire, criticism of, and simply telling the truth about Islam, the character of Mohammed and the evils of the Qur’an are all essential elements in the fight against jihad, Islamic supremacism and sharia. But the destruction of Mecca will probably become a necessity when Muslims attempt a takeover over the USA. I give that 25 years at the most or much sooner if Clinton is elected next month then repeats what Merkel has done to Germany.
Tjhawk says
Yes, I did notice that you did not call for attacks on mosques. I’m sorry that I made it seem that you did. I just wanted to give my opinion about how idiots like these guys in Garden City actually play into the jihadists hands.
gravenimage says
I’ve said before that I really don’t think that destroying Mecca of the Kaaba would destroy Islam.
David M says
If these Muslims love Sharia so much they should be living in Islamic countries under Sharia law already. It would be so easy to win an argument with these fools as to why they are living in western countries.
This is really interesting, an Indonesian governor in trouble over the interpretation of Quran verse 51, prohibiting Muslims living under the leadership of a non Muslim.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/jakarta-governor-ahok-investigated-over-alleged-islam-insult-as-elections-loom-20161018-gs510o.html
Angemon says
This coming from the person who nonchalantly talked about how the quran prescribes the cutting of hands, trying to sugar coat it by saying it was “under certain and strict conditions]. One would think that cutting someone’s hand would be a ” horrific image” born “of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text”. Oh, and calm societal application of sharia? Never going to happen. Even if the Canadian government enacts laws to stifle opposition to gradual application of sharia law and no Canadian has the balls to rise and say “not in my country”, you’ll still have muslims thinking gradual implementation is not the solution and that fighting and terrorizing non-muslims is how sharia should be made law.
gravenimage says
Very true, Angemon. Even while openly saying that he would have people *stoned to death*, this Mohammedan pretends that if Canada *doesn’t* allow this barbarism that what Muslims will otherwise impose will somehow be “extremist”–in other words, do as we say, Infidels, or it will (somehow) be even worse.
Yorkshire Kufir says
And all this Sharia in the name of fairness with the assistance from graduates of Social Justice and gender studies courses and the approval of black lives matter idiots. It’s a shame when kids turn from science and reason and take up ideology as the easy option for getting wealth and power for a short term..
gravenimage says
So far we haven’t actually seen Leftists advocating amputation and stonings–but Muslims hope they will come around…
alpha_1 says
I’ve been trying for two days, including today, to post this and other stories to my Facebook page but it appears I’ve been blocked. So much for free speech.
gravenimage says
Sorry to hear this, alpha_1–has Facebook given you any explanation?
patriotliz says
This is a good example of Progressive Communism in alliance with AND feeding the crocodile of Progressive Islamic totalitarianism which will result in their “shared goal” of the progressive destruction of Western Civilization and Jude-Christian culture. The Progressive communists of course, hope that at least they will be eaten last by the crocodile. Dumb-dumb-dhimmis.
gravenimage says
No Infidels–not even Communists–have agreed to this barbarism–not yet, anyway.
Lynne says
How can any intelligent person believe this because it is so ludicrous. The average Canadian does not comprehend the facts about sharia. We all must keep hammering away at the danger.
I know it’s worse for the females but even the males can’t have much of a life being a Muslim. No art, music, joy of any kind except what happens if you commit jihad.
Arian Smith says
“If a comprehensive approach to Shariah is not adopted then one may expect to witness horrific images of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text, the likes of which we have witnessed in recent times.”
In other words, muslims will continue to terrorize your society until you implement sharia law.
Coming from a “peaceful, moderate” muslim. Got it.
Mubarak says
Adding to Arian Smith’s comment above:
This is “Jihad Watch” at its best.
Who would have thought about exposing a “respectable” “writer, public speaker, community organizer, and marketing consultant”, issuing covert threats of violence: “If a comprehensive approach to Shariah is not adopted then one may expect to witness horrific images of extremist, selective, and literal application of the Islamic text, the likes of which we have witnessed in recent times.” as if that was the utmost consideration for society, when it instead ought to earn him a prison sentence, but Christine Williams did.
Thank you!
gravenimage says
Says the poster who has demanded that we stop allowing women to attend public celebrations lest we want them raped by his foul coreligionists.
In other words–just as he says–we must adopt Shari’ah strictures, or else Muslims are going to continue to violently target us.
Here’s what he wrote, just after the mass Muslim rapes of women in Cologne and other German cities on New Year’s Eve:
“Mubarak says
February 16, 2016 at 4:27 am
I know it is not political correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.
Is this offense of public nudity informed by a morality that is loftier than the one that is protested against —? And the West is filled with vulgar, public commercials and public exposures of women narcissistically prostituting themselves and their bodies to the effect, that males and females now march by the thousands and millions in parades all over the Western World priding themselves that the opposite sex no longer excites them or indeed can excite them. Could it be, that these carnivallers ironically express, that they have become fed up with the constant exposure of cheap, rotten flesh everywhere around them thus advertising, that lust for their own kind and flesh is the only and ultimate “freedom” that can revive them and us and save us all?
And shouldn’t women in the West be happy anyway, that they can attract the attention of newcomers, and that these take trouble to bother them?
I hope these questions offend you because it must needs be that offense come in order for us all to fall on our collective nose. Or even better: that the stumbling block falls on us, that we and our petty moral categories can be smashed and shattered into pieces. Tertium non datur.
So thank God for Muslims who migrate or immigrate to the west. If we can persuade them to absorb what is their and our Judeo-Christian inheritance – blood and public nudity – and exhale what they falsely and deceivingly believe to be theirs, the world could be a beautiful place. But to that end we need the prophet Isaiah – not a hysterical performance artist.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853
Lots more ugliness from him on that thread–and on many others.
Fraser says
And we now have 10 ± muslim mps in the Liberal government, 2or 3 in senior positions! What will 2115 bring?
RK says
This is their culture, from their land….And its about time people start putting the word: “Assimilate”, back into their vocabulary before we don’t have a Country or culture of u’r own left! Shameful Idiots to do this to u’r own people and Country! God help us all.
Its Time to fire every politician and get back to building our own Countries in pride and dignity- And Stop giving away who we are as a people, for what ask u’rself- answer: for our own self destruction!
Wake the hell up people, wake up! If they dislike where they came to so much- from the laws, culture, people etc then they must go back to where they came from. Enough already, enough!
And stop all the freebies, no welfare etc, this is our money for our law abiding citizens, not for some politicians idea of a “one” world order, when clearly we are NOT the same and we weren’t asked what we want… the facts are the facts, no matter which way u spin them. It all comes out the same, a slow take over, with the help of our own governments and politicians- those that we were suppose to trust in keeping us safe and free of all this mayhem and destruction of who we are as a people. Lord help s all.
gravenimage says
RK wrote:
If they dislike where they came to so much- from the laws, culture, people etc then they must go back to where they came from. Enough already, enough!
…………………………
RK, they do not come here to assimilate to our civilized societies. They come here to force us to submit to Islam.
John A. Marre says
Already happening.
Indrajit says
Eleven -step recipe to make a peaceful prosperous land to a disputed territory
1. Identify a beautiful land.
2. Attack it in the name of God.
3. Convert people , kill those who don’t convert.
4. Enslave women and children. Keep them as concubines and tell world that you are taking care of helpless women.
5. Destroy their holy shrines. Build yours on their ruins.
6. When they fight back, call them enemies of God.
7. When they take hold of their lost land, call them occupation forces.
8. Cry in front of world and demand human rights.
9. Demand separate nation.
10. Get separate nation by bloodshed.
11. Go back to 1 and repeat it endlessly
Bradthefuzz says
Abide in the holiness of Jesus Christ. There is no holiness in sharia law.