• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hillary Clinton’s long record of enabling the global jihad

Oct 15, 2016 12:57 pm By Robert Spencer

The facts at hand presumably speak for themselves, but a trifle more vulgarly, I suspect, than facts even usually do.

hillary_clinton

“The Clinton Record,” by John Perazzo, FrontPage, October 14, 2016:

Never in American history has anyone as unfit and undeserving as Hillary Clinton run for U.S. President. While she stands on the threshold of being elected to the White House, she quite literally belongs in a prison cell. This article lays out the case against her, chapter and verse….

The Clinton Foundation Scandals

In an effort to prevent foreign governments, organizations, and individuals from influencing the policy decisions of American national leaders, campaign-finance laws prohibit U.S. political figures from accepting money from foreign sources. But as the Washington Post noted in February 2015, the Bill, Hillary, & Chelsea Clinton Foundation “has given donors a way to potentially gain favor with the Clintons outside the traditional political [donation] limits.”9

As of February 2015, foreign sources accounted for about one-third of all donors who had given the Clinton Foundation more than $1 million, and over half of those who had contributed more than $5 million.10 Foreign donors that gave money to the Foundation included: Hezbollah supporter Issam Fares, who once served as deputy prime minister of Lebanon;11 the Dubai Foundation, which also gave money to the families of Palestinian terrorists killed in action;12 the royal family of the United Arab Emirates; a Dubai-based company that promotes Sharia Law;13 a privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate headed by a delegate of the Chinese parliament;14 and the governments of Saudi Arabia, Brunei, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.15

Even during Clinton’s tenure (2009-13) as secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in donations from seven foreign governments.

Bill Clinton earned a total of $48 million from foreign sources for his appearance and speaking fees during his wife’s term as secretary.16

In August 2016, the Associated Press reported that 85 of Hillary Clinton’s 154 scheduled meetings and phone calls with non-governmental personnel during her time at the State Department were with donors who gave $156 million to the Clinton Foundation. The AP report also revealed that the Clinton Foundation had received $170 million in donations from at least 16 foreign governments whose representatives met personally with Mrs. Clinton.17

In May 2015, the International Business Times reported that the Clinton State Department had approved billions of dollars in arms deals with governments that donated to the Clinton Foundation, including governments that were infamous for their appalling human-rights records.18

But the Clinton Foundation certainly does many wonderful things for needy people around the world, doesn’t it? Well, according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist, between 2009-12 the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million in total. A mere 15% of that went towards programmatic grants. The other $425 million went to travel expenses, employee salaries and benefits, and “other expenses.”19 In 2013, the Clinton Foundation allocated only 6% of its revenues to direct charitable aid.20

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the millions of women around the world who have never benefited from the charitable services that the Clinton Foundation purports to provide, because the Foundation only spends a tiny percentage of its funds on actual charity.

Clinton’s Support for the Iran Nuclear Deal

Vowing that Mrs. Clinton will “preven[t] Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” the Clinton presidential campaign website assures Americans that “Hillary will vigorously enforce the nuclear agreement with Iran.” Is this a good thing? Consider that the agreement’s key provisions were as follows:

  • Iran was permitted to keep more than 5,000 centrifuges.
  • Iran received $150 billion in sanctions relief.
  • Russia and China were permitted to supply Iran with weapons.
  • Iran was given the discretion to block international inspectors from its military installations, and was promised that it would receive 14 days’ notice for any request to visit a given site.
  • Only inspectors from countries that had diplomatic relations with Iran would be given access to Iranian nuclear sites; thus there would be no American inspectors.
  • An embargo on the sale of weapons to Iran would be officially lifted in 5 years.
  • Iran’s intercontinental ballistic missile program would remain intact.
  • The U.S. pledged that it would provide technical assistance to help Iran develop its nuclear program and protect its nuclear facilities, supposedly for peaceful domestic purposes.
  • Sanctions would be lifted on critical parts of Iran’s military.
  • Iran was not required to release American prisoners whom it was holding on trumped-up charges.21

As a result of this nuclear deal that Mrs. Clinton so enthusiastically supports, Iran is guaranteed of having a near-zero breakout time to a nuclear bomb approximately a decade down the road.

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the scores of millions of women in the U.S., Israel, and elsewhere, whose very lives have been placed in irreversible peril as a result of this deal….

The Benghazi Debacle, and Clinton’s Role in Arming Jihadists in Libya and SyriaThroughout 2012, violent jihadist activity became increasingly commonplace in the city of Benghazi and elsewhere throughout Libya and North Africa. American personnel at the U.S. mission in Benghazi repeatedly asked the Clinton State Department for increased security provisions during 2012, but all of these requests were either denied or ignored.25

On the night of September 11, 2012, a large group of heavily armed Islamic terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi with great violence.26 In the process, they killed the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans.

For weeks thereafter, Mrs. Clinton and the rest of the Obama administration continued to characterize what had occurred on September 11 in Benghazi not as a carefully orchestrated act of terrorism, but as a spontaneous uprising that evolved unexpectedly from what had begun as a low-level protest against an obscure YouTube video.

For the administration, it was vital to continue putting forth this false narrative because, with the presidential election only a few weeks away, nothing could be permitted to puncture the Obama-Clinton talking points: “Al Qaeda is on the run” and “Osama bin Laden is dead.”27

In reality, however, within mere hours after the September 11 attack, U.S. intelligence agencies had already gained more than enough evidence to conclude unequivocally that it was a planned terrorist incident, and that the YouTube video had nothing whatsoever to do with it.28

On January 23, 2013 — fully 134 days after the September 11 attack in Benghazi — Mrs. Clinton went before Congress to testify as to what she knew about the incident. At one point in the hearing, Senator Rand Paul asked her whether the United States had ever been involved in procuring weapons in Libya and transferring them to other countries including Syria. Clinton replied, “I do not know. I have no information on that.”29

But a March 25, 2013 New York Times story subsequently indicated that the Obama administration had in fact been sending arms from Libya, through intermediary nations and ultimately to Syria, since early 2012. And another Times article described Mrs. Clinton as one of the driving forces who had called for arming the Syrian rebels (who were fighting Syrian President Assad) in precisely that manner.30 In other words, Clinton had lied in her congressional testimony to Rand Paul.

It should be noted that the Syrian rebels whom Clinton and Obama were aiding consisted of Islamic jihadists, many of whom were affiliated with Al Qaeda. In July 2016, Julian Assange of Wikileaks revealed that a batch of hacked DNC emails contained information proving that Clinton, contrary to what she had said in her congressional testimony in 2013, knew as early as 2011 that the U.S. was sending arms from Libya to jihadists in Syria.31

And in October 2016, a Fox News report indicated that Obama and Clinton had also arranged for the provision of weapons to radical jihadists in Libya.32

In September 2014, former Deputy Secretary of State Raymond Maxwell reported that in late 2012 he had witnessed — in the basement of the State Department’s headquarters — a Sunday meeting in which Cheryl Mills (Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff) and Jake Sullivan (Clinton’s deputy chief of staff) were overseeing and directing staffers who were busy purging documents that might implicate Clinton or her top people in the Benghazi attacks.33

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including: (a) the Libyan and Syrian women whose lives were destroyed by the jihadists whom Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama supported, and (b) the wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters of the four Americans who were slaughtered by jihadists in Benghazi.

The Radical Islamist Affiliations of Clinton’s Closest Aide

Hillary Clinton’s closest aide for many years has been Huma Abedin, whose late father, Syed Abedin, was affiliated with the Muslim Students Association (MSA). The MSA grew out of the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, which Islam expert Robert Spencer has described as “the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda.”34

Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a prominent member of the Muslim Sisterhood — the Muslim Brotherhood’s division for women. She is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief, a pro-Hamas entity that is part of the “Union of Good,” which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization. Saleha once wrote an article blaming America for having provoked the Islamic “anger and hostility” that led to the 9/11 attacks.35

From 1996-2008, Huma Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank founded by Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who once served as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, a vehicle by which the Muslim Brotherhood promotes the ideology of Islamic supremacism. Naseef also had ties to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, with whom he communicated.36 Abedin was the assistant editor of IMMA’s in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with Abdullah Omar Naseef’s active presence in the IMMA.37

It is vital to note that the IMMA’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs. It is designed, as former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.”38

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she respects women, including the hundreds of millions of women in Muslim nations who are oppressed by the very same Sharia Law that is promoted by the organization to which Huma Abedin devoted 12 years of her life.

The Deadly Consequences of Clinton’s Absurd Fictions About Islam & Terrorism

In 2011 the Obama administration, in which Mrs. Clinton was obviously a major player, decided to purge, from the training materials and curricula of all federal intelligence and criminal investigators, every single item suggesting that “jihad” or “Islam” were in any way related to terrorism.39 Instead, the new objective would be “countering violent extremism,” improving “cultural competency training across the United States Government,” and promoting “cultural awareness.”40 All told, the FBI removed more than 1,000 presentations and curriculum items that were deemed “offensive” or “Islamophobic.”41

The FBI’s decision to change its training materials and interrogation methods went on to have deadly serious, real-world consequences. A particularly noteworthy case involved jihadist Omar Mateen, who in June 2016 entered a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida and murdered 49 people while wounding 53 others. The FBI had investigated Mateen extensively for 10 months in 2013 because he had family connections to Al Qaeda, he was a member of a Shi’a terrorist organization, and he had issued terroristic threats on a number of occasions. But eventually, the FBI canceled that investigation because, in accordance with the tenets of its revised training materials, it concluded that Mateen posed no threat to anyone; that his biggest problem was the psychic pain he was suffering as a result of “being marginalized because of his Muslim faith.” As a result of this absurd line of reasoning, 49 innocent people from Orlando are now lying in their graves.42

Hillary Clinton agrees completely with the notion that it is both counterproductive and morally unjustified to suggest any connection between Islam and terrorism — the same delusional, preposterous mentality that enabled the Orlando mass murder to take place.

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women and homosexuals, including the 49 people who were slaughtered in the Orlando nightclub.

Clinton’s Role in the Rise of ISIS and the Stratospheric Growth of Worldwide Terrorism

ISIS, which evolved out of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), grew into the most powerful, well-funded horde of bloodthirsty barbarians in world history, right under Mrs. Clinton’s nose, and precisely during her watch as secretary of state. While ISIS launched its campaign of mass rapes, beheadings, slaughters, and tortures of unimaginable brutality — and gained control over enormous portions of Iraq and Syria — Clinton and President Obama did absolutely nothing to thwart it.43

Moreover, the rise of ISIS coincided with the expansion of terrorism to unprecedented levels all over the world. According to the Global Terrorism Index, fatalities caused by terrorism increased from 3,361 in 2000, to 11,133 in 2012, to 18,111 in 2013, to 32,658 in 2014. More than half of the 2014 killings were carried out by ISIS and Boko Haram, the latter of which has pledged allegiance to ISIS.44 In other words, worldwide terrorism has spiraled out of control under Obama, Clinton, and Clinton’s successor, John Kerry.

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women everywhere, including the many thousands who are killed by terrorists across the globe each year.

Clinton’s Role in Squandering America’s Victory in the Iraq War

ISIS’s meteoric ascent to power occurred as a direct result of President Obama’s decision to rapidly withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq — against the advice of experienced military leaders — in 2011. Retired Army General John M. Keane, the last American commander in Iraq, had recommended that 23,000 U.S. troops be left in place to secure the U.S. war victory. But Obama, wanting to be remembered most of all as the president who ended wars rather than fought them, left no forces behind. Beaming with pride, he frequently took credit for bringing American military involvement in Iraq to a formal close.45

Of course, when ISIS later grew into a genocidal monster, Obama tried to claim that his withdrawal from Iraq had been forced upon him by a December 2008 deal in which President Bush and Iraqi president Maliki signed a “status-of-forces” agreement stipulating that all U.S. troops must leave Iraq by December 2011.46

But status-of-forces agreements are often amended and renegotiated, based on evolving security concerns. Obama left no U.S. forces in Iraq for one very simple and obvious reason: he didn’t want to. As Obama himself stated during a 2012 debate with Republican challenger Mitt Romney: “What I would not have done is left 10,000 troops [a far cry from the 23,000 recommended by General Keane] in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.”47

It is vital to remember, moreover, that Iraqi president Maliki would have been quite willing to accept a new status-of-forces agreement in 2011, had it stipulated that the U.S. would leave behind a contingent of troops large enough to effectively secure the peace. But when Obama and Clinton proposed to leave a mere 2,000 to 3,000 troops in Iraq, Maliki had no choice but to refuse. As National Review explains: “[T]he problem was that the Obama administration wanted a small force so that it could say it had ended the war. Having a very small American force wasn’t worth the domestic political price Maliki would have to pay for supporting their presence.”48

When Obama was deciding to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq, Hillary Clinton was in 100% agreement with him. As Fox News reports: “Clinton was a leading and outspoken supporter of the Obama administration’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq…. Clinton touted the United States’ commitment to Iraq in 2011 and said the Obama administration has ‘a plan in place’ to ensure Iraq’s security.”49

Instead, Iraq turned into a beehive of jihadism, terrorism, and mass murder.

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women everywhere, including the millions whose lives were destroyed when a stable Iraq descended once again into anarchy and terror.

Clinton’s Horrible Judgment Regarding Another Terrorist Enemy

As a member of the U.S. Senate, Mrs. Clinton opposed President Bush’s January 2007 decision to deploy an additional 21,500 troops in a military “surge” designed to turn the tide of the Iraq War — which had devolved into a bloody quagmire — back in America’s favor:

  • In December 2006, when Bush was still contemplating the surge, Clinton said: “Everyone knows there is no military solution to the difficulties we face in Iraq.”50
  • In January 2007, Clinton complained that the surge was “taking troops away from Afghanistan, where I think we need to be putting more troops, and sending them to Iraq on a mission that I think has a very limited, if any, chance for success.”51
  • In August 2007, Clinton said: “The surge was designed to give the Iraqi government time to take steps to ensure a political solution to the situation. It has failed to do so…. It is abundantly clear that there is no military solution to the sectarian fighting in Iraq. We need to stop refereeing the war, and start getting out now.”52
  • When General David Petraeus issued a September 2007 report on the remarkably successful results that the surge was yielding, Clinton obstinately told Petraeus that his assertions required “a willing suspension of disbelief.”53

Contrary to Clinton’s erroneous predictions and dispiriting rhetoric, the troop surge proved to be a monumentally important strategy that finally enabled the U.S. to crush the Iraqi insurgency. Prior to the surge, it had not been uncommon for 3,000 or more Iraqi civilians and security-force members to die at the hands of terrorist violence during any given month. By May 2008, the monthly mortality figure stood at 19, and it fluctuated between 7 and 25 deaths per month over the ensuing 14 months.54

In his 2014 memoir, Robert Gates — who had served as Secretary of Defense under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama — wrote that Hillary Clinton’s opposition to the troop surge had been based on how she thought her own political fortunes would be affected by taking that position. For example, Gates described a “remarkable” exchange that he had witnessed, where Clinton, speaking retrospectively, “told the president that her opposition to the [2007] surge in Iraq had been political because she was facing him in the Iowa primary” and could not afford to be perceived as pro-war.55

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women everywhere, including the millions to whom she tried to deny the protection of American forces in the troop surge….

Clinton’s Reprehensible Treatment of IsraelIn 2010, Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren said that during the first two years of the Obama-Clinton administration, “Israel’s ties with the United States” had reached “their worst crisis since 1975 … a crisis of historic proportions.”60

Some may recall how Mrs. Clinton betrayed Israel in the aftermath of an infamous 2010 incident where terrorist members of a Turkish organization known as the IHH — which has ties to Hamas, Al Qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood — participated in a six-ship flotilla of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel activists who sailed to Gaza for the purpose of breaking Israel’s naval “blockade” there. (That “blockade” was, in reality, a policy whereby Israel insisted on examining all imports passing through Gaza, so as to prevent the ruling Hamas government, which has sworn its permanent allegiance to the destruction of Israel and the genocide of Jews, from importing weaponry from abroad). The flotilla’s lead ship was owned and operated by IHH. When its crew refused to comply with repeated Israeli demands that it submit to an inspection of its cargo, Israeli commandos boarded the vessel and were violently attacked by IHH terrorists. In the melee that ensued, nine IHH members were killed, and seven Israeli soldiers were wounded. Thereafter, Clinton, by her own telling, “spent … literally years trying to get the Israelis to finally apologize to the Turks on the flotilla.”61

In the summer of 2014, Israel engaged in a massive military operation designed to weaken the destructive capacity of Hamas terrorists who were launching more than 100 potentially deadly missiles per day from Gaza, deep into Israel. Before long, Israel discovered that Hamas, in recent years, had constructed a massive network of at least 60 underground missile storage-and-transport tunnels throughout Gaza. A number of those tunnels extended, underground, into Israeli territory — for the purpose of facilitating terror attacks, murders, and kidnappings against unsuspecting Israeli citizens. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Hamas had spent between $1 million and $10 million to build each of those tunnels, using as many as 350 truckloads of cement and other supplies per tunnel.62

Then, in a bombshell revelation in August 2014, Dennis Ross, who had served as Secretary of State Clinton’s senior Mideast policy adviser, revealed that Clinton had personally assigned him the task of pressuring Israel to ease up on its military blockade of Gaza. “I argued with Israeli leaders and security officials, telling them they needed to allow more construction materials, including cement, into Gaza so that housing, schools and basic infrastructure could be built,” said Ross. “They countered that Hamas would misuse it, and they were right.” As one analysis aptly puts it, “Ross’s admission shows that it was [Clinton] who sent her personal envoy to push for a policy that ultimately enabled Hamas to build the terror tunnels.”63

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the millions of Israeli Jews whose lives were placed in peril by Hamas’s underground tunnels and illegally imported weaponry.

Clinton Turns Libya into a Terrorist Hell Hole

During her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton pushed hard for the U.S. to take military action designed to drive Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya.64 According to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who served under President Obama, Clinton played a major role in convincing Obama to lead a protracted NATO bombing campaign against Gaddafi in 2011 — a campaign that lent support to opposition rebels consisting of ISIS, Ansar al-Sharia, and other local militant groups. In other words, Clinton and Obama — in their quest to unseat Gaddafi — were aiding murderous jihadists in Libya.

What is remarkable about this, is the fact that Gaddafi at that time no longer posed any threat to American national security. Indeed, just prior to the Al Qaeda-led uprising that Clinton and Obama supported, Libya was providing the U.S. with important intelligence data. Moreover, it was a prospering, secular Islamic nation that had a national budget surplus of 8.7% and was producing 1.8 million barrels of oil per day.

By the time the Obama-Clinton bombing campaign was finished, Libya’s economy had shrunk by 42% and was operating at an annual deficit of 17.1%; oil production was down by at least 80%.65

According to Foreign Policy In Focus, the Obama-Clinton strategy “plunged” Libya “into chaotic unrest” and “turned [it] into a cauldron of anarchy.”66 Today Libya is a nation teeming with jihadists, and ISIS is becoming increasingly powerful there.67

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the millions in Libya who are now drowning in a tsunami of terrorism.

Clinton’s Plan to Import 65,000 Syrian Refugees into the U.S. As Quickly As Possible

“We have to stem the flow of jihadists from Europe and America to and from Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan,” says the Clinton presidential campaign website.68 While this sounds like a grand idea, it begs a very obvious question: Why has Hillary Clinton explicitly called for bringing at least 65,000 refugees from Syria into the United States as quickly as possible,69 even though:

  • ISIS has vowed to deploy terrorist operatives to infiltrate the flow of Syrian refugees heading to Western nations?70
  • more than 1,500 terror-linked refugees, asylees and migrants entered the U.S. in 2014 alone?71
  • more than 30,000 illegal immigrants from “countries of terrorist concern” entered the United States through America’s Southwestern border with Mexico in 2015?72
  • Michael Steinbach, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counter-terrorism unit, has made it clear that it is virtually impossible to screen out terrorists who could be posing as refugees and coming to America?73
  • FBI Director James Comey has said that the federal government does not have the ability to conduct reliable background checks on the Syrian refugees, and has warned that “there will be a terrorist diaspora [from Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East] sometime in the next two to five years like we’ve never seen before”?74
  • Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has admitted that the U.S. will not “know a whole lot” about the refugees it accepts?75
  • CIA director John Brennan has said that ISIS “is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including in refugee flows …”?76

As a direct result of the policy that Mrs. Clinton herself has spelled out, scores of thousands of people from the very seat of ISIS’s power will soon be streaming into the United States at a record pace.

But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the countless American women whose lives may be imperiled by an influx of Syrian terrorists posing as refugees.

Taking a long-range view of American migration and refugee policy, Mrs. Clinton understands that eventually, when these Syrian refugees and their relatives, and then their descendants, become registered voters, they will vote heavily Democrat, as the vast majority of immigrants from the Middle East have always done.77

And if some Americans have to get murdered along the way by terrorist infiltrators, so be it. To Mrs. Clinton, that is simply one of the costs of doing (political) business….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Useful idiots Tagged With: Hillary Clinton


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. abad says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    A burka would greatly improve Hillary’s appearance – maybe her BFF Huma Abedin can lend one of hers.

    • Kepha says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 7:09 pm

      OT–My wife and I took our 5-year-old granddaughter to the outlets to shop. En route, our granddaughter expressed a fear of ghosts, and my wife persuaded her of their non-existence (except, of course, for the Holy Ghost ;)). However, at the outlets, while my granddaughter and I were sitting on a bench waiting for grandma to finish her shopping in one of the stores, a woman in a full black abaya with only slits passed by. “See grandpa,” said our granddaughter, “there are ghosts!”

      • john spielman says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 8:53 pm

        more like EVIl spirits

        • Mark Swan says

          Oct 17, 2016 at 5:55 am

          Good One Kepha, thanks for sharing that one.

    • Champ says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 2:14 am

      “A burka would greatly improve Hillary’s appearance – maybe her BFF Huma Abedin can lend one of hers.”

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      LOL!!! 😀

  2. Linde Barrera says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    Great, comprehensive article. Please send this to the Trump campaign.

    • Christian Nelson says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 5:57 am

      Trump knows all of this as he called out Obama and Clinton for supporting and founding ISIS, now further verified by the fact that Hillary knew that Saudi’s and Qatar were funding ISIS and other radical Islamic groups but received donations(bribes) from these countries. Trump has been vilified by the MSM for speaking out on this issues.The choice is clear: A patriot or a corrupt, lying treasonous globalist criminal intent on destroying the US byuslim and Hispanic immigration jihad

    • Grace says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 3:31 pm

      I agree – great article, should be on the front pages of every newspaper in the US tomorrow! Also, very effective, using the lines “But, hey, who cares…” after every point the author makes. Reminds me of Hillary’s own words at one of the Benghazi hearings, when she said “At this point, what difference does it make?”…

  3. Gene says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    “Never in American history has anyone as unfit and undeserving as Hillary Clinton run for U.S. President.”

    Every election year we say something similar about the Democratic candidate. And when the next election comes around, the Democrats out do themselves. Now the Republicans have joined in and are trying to keep up with the Dems.

    • Allan says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 2:58 pm

      Trump is a Democrat who decided that his chances of becoming president would be much better by pretending to be a Republican. It’s well known also that he was a crony of the Clintons, and just recently I learned that he was involved in helping Pelosi to become speaker of the house. So, the Republicans don’t actually have a candidate in this year’s presidential election.

      • terry says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 9:29 am

        lol They did not have a candidate in the last five elections! Proof: Bushes are voting for the Democratic candidate IN THIS ELECTION.

      • Steve says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 10:13 am

        Republicans have not Elected a Republican since Reagan, but Trump wants to improve life for Americans. Hillary is a known criminal who will sell America to the highest bidder. The choice is Obvious.

        • Carolyne says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 11:09 am

          Of course if one wants the Supreme Court to be packed by Clinton left-wing one-world appointed Justices, and if one wants to lose major rights given us in the Constitution of the US, i.e. the right of free speech and to possess guns among others, then do by all means vote for Hillary Clinton.

          If one does not want to actually have a homeland, but have no borders then do vote for Mrs. Clinton.

          If one wishes to have the US sold out to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries via the money-laundering operation of the Clinton Foundation, you would be making a mistake by voting for Donald Trump.

          However, if one cares about one’s country and future of children and grandchildren, one would never put it in the hands of the Clinton criminal enterprise, with the wife of a rapist at the helm, a wife who enabled her to abuse women and further victimized the victims.

          If you want to hand over your country to a corrupt crime family, on the payroll of middle eastern potentates vote for Hillary Clinton.

          If, however, you wish to save your country from corrupt criminals and Islamic terrorism, vote for Donald Trump.

    • le mouron rouge says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 6:26 pm

      Gene,

      Very true.

      In reality we have one party, Socialist Party D or R. America is circling the drain.

      http://concerningthetimes.com/america-god-given/

      • Mark Swan says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 10:57 pm

        I like that phrase “circling the drain” good one.

  4. Malcolm (SouthAfria) says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    This is not my work, however in total agreement:

    Western nations should further accept Christian refugees because Western foreign policies are directly responsible for exacerbating their persecution. Christians did not flee from Bashar Assad’s Syria, or Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, or Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. Their systematic persecution — to the point of genocide — began only after the U.S. and other European nations interfered in those nations under the pretext of “democracy.” All they did is unleash the jihadi forces that the dictators had long kept suppressed. Now the Islamic State is deeply embedded in all three nations, enslaving, raping, and slaughtering countless Christian “infidels” and other minorities.

    • Mark Swan says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 10:58 pm

      Good points Malcolm

    • gravenimage says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 11:05 pm

      Malcolm (SouthAfria) wrote:

      Christians did not flee from Bashar Assad’s Syria, or Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, or Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. Their systematic persecution — to the point of genocide — began only after the U.S. and other European nations interfered in those nations under the pretext of “democracy.”
      ……………………………

      If you study history, you will see that Muslims have been raping and mass-murdering Christians for centuries. In much of Dar-al-Islam, only a remnant of Christians and other Infidels remained even before the horrific resurgence of Islam of the past two decades.

      For example, surely you are familiar with the Armenian Genocide?

      • Mark Swan says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 11:52 pm

        Yes that is true, and I think what Malcolm has said is it has been let wide open in just the
        past years with all the chaos that took place after the strong man leadership was taken
        away along with its governing power, either way it is business as usual there, just a
        different day, with the same Muslim madness a little less controlled.

        • Carolyne says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 11:18 am

          Remember the “Arab Spring” where Hillary Clinton maneuvered to have Gaddafy killed in a most horrible way and Libya is left in shreds with Muslim terrorists in control and at this moment attacking the last vestige of its government? And Mubarak in Egypt deposed by Hillary Clinton’s pal Huma Abedin’s beloved Muslim Brotherhood took over and was so inhumane and misogynist that the army took over and installed El Sisi? Hillary’s doing. She’s proud of her “Arab Spring,” Where tens of thousands were murdered. And she said, in referring to Gaddafy’s murder, “We came, we saw, he died.” That is a direct quote.

          She has blood on her hands and I do not want that blood dripping in the White House. She is a brain-damaged elderly immoral woman who was never Presidential material and is even less so now. A creature without human feelings–a psychopath.

        • Mark Swan says

          Oct 17, 2016 at 6:01 am

          Absolutely Carolyne

    • Angemon says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      Malcolm (SouthAfria) posted:

      “Their systematic persecution — to the point of genocide — began only after the U.S. and other European nations interfered in those nations under the pretext of “democracy.” ”

      OK, so you’re just as ignorant as the person who originally wrote that. What’s your point?

  5. mortimer says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:47 pm

    The picture of that Jezebel above speaks volumes. She is one of the poorest-informed people on earth in the matter of Islam. She is being fed information by Huma Abedin, a Saudi secret agent.

    • Ed Lee says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 2:48 pm

      No, she is not “one of the poorest-informed people on earth in the matter of Islam”. She is a willing collaborator. The American people have been sold down the river. Recall where the phrase “sold down the river” comes from. Google it, if you don’t know.

    • Ciudadano says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 1:09 am

      I don’t think she is poor informed. I think she is a quite cynical and maquiavelical politician. She knows christians don’t support her policies and don’t vote for her. She hates christians from any denomination. She will support any one who is against christians. Since the balkans wars she has consistently supported the islamists. She supporst “secular” policies, ie, anti christian policies. She is indolent about human rigght violations in islamic countries (that coincidentaly give million$ to her fiundation. She doesnt care about christian genocide. She supports lgtb agenda,etc. She supprts islamist agenda in usa.

      Who would’ve thought the anti christ would be a woman.

      • exhausted says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 6:35 pm

        oh, but remember her rapist husband hauls that big ole bible into church!

  6. David says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 2:10 pm

    Crooked Granny Clinton would be THE WORST POSSIBLE CHOICE for our next President.

  7. TJ says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 2:27 pm

    One way bible believers could fight back against jihad enablers in the government is to learn how to show the bible holds a dominant edge over the koran. When I looked at the koran, I saw its prophetic arrangement had been sabotaged on purpose. This was done by giving them a few prophecies and then doing nothing else to help show show when they were fulfilled. This is a curse, not a blessing, and one the koran deserves for its obvious exaggerations against Christian and Jews. Killing people for not believing in exaggerations is murder, not holiness. The situation in the bible is much more impressive. It was easy to coordinate a lot of yet unfulfilled biblical statements from different Jews and build them together like an altar in front of God for God to strike. Some of the words make it necessary for the builder to have experience with how much more talented God is than people are at knowing when someone is being killed. It is intentionally a terrible strategy against people who murder and get away with it. The words which were made to motivate God to intervene against murder took over a thousand years to build so it looks like God did it. This strategy is not only terrible for murderous jihadists, it is terrible for those who abduct and murder those vulnerable and escape the limited knowledge of police and so they seem to get away with it. The Jewish prophets are obviously out to build an intervention strategy against those who murder biblical people and other victims, and that is why they are worth supporting. This exact strategy of theirs gives an edge for the bible over the koran and puts murderous jihadists in a disastrous situation. These biblical Jews are perfectly and purposefully poised to terminate the koran. Christians should use the words in the bible this way, for this is who we are and what we do against the many antichrists who have exaggerated and murdered and made themselves out to be God.

    • Carolyne says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 11:29 am

      The best way to fight back against jihadist enablers is not to elect them to public office.

  8. Champ says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 2:45 pm

    A must-see movie!

  9. billybob says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 3:14 pm

    That was an excellent, sober, academically sound denouncement of Hillary Clinton by Robert Spencer. Unfortunately, someone interspersed it with the following puerile, sophomoric phrase no less than 11 times…

    “But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the countless American women whose lives may be imperiled by an influx of Syrian terrorists posing as refugees.”

    My guess is that is a veiled reference to Donald Trump coupled with gratuitous sarcasm referring to Hillary herself. I would suggest that phrase kind of destroys the orderly presentation of hard-hitting evidence. Better to have left it out and trust in the reader to draw whatever conclusions she may, now well equipped with truth.

    Besides, Donald Trump’s problems go well beyond indulging in “crude, private trash talk”. He is impulsive and impetuous and prone to putting his foot in his mouth. Altogether as totally unsuited to being President as Hillary.

    What are we to do? I am afraid the election does not hold the answer to the problems the nation is confronted with. I think everybody should simply tear up their ballots and demand better candidates. Well, obviously that is no solution either. What is need is a revolution. It could be a peaceful one. It could be people marching on media outlets, for example, demanding that they tell the truth on their nightly news casts. It could be a social movement demanding an end to Islamic immigration. Whatever. I don’t have the answer.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:32 pm

      Spencer has been laying out the cold hard facts of Islam to America for decades now, and analyzing the response to it by the government, media and general culture. He’s been proven right on everything. So this is no time for writing critiques.

    • Robert Spencer says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:51 pm

      I did not write this article. As is clearly indicated, John Perazzo did.

      • Yohanan says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 9:14 am

        – -John Pezzaro’s article is indeed a devastating expose on Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. Hillary’s liabilities are damning.

        – Thanks for sharing it because I might not have opened your link to its in FrontPage Mag, Oct 14 source.

        – Suggestion, when quoting an article in total under your own byline, perhaps make the author attribution even clearer for us speed readers, possibly by putting the AUTHOR’S NAME in CAPS.

    • le mouron rouge says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 7:18 pm

      billybob says:

      “What are we to do? I am afraid the election does not hold the answer to the problems the nation is confronted with.”

      You are correct, the election, a new President, a new Congress, etc. will not solve the very serious problems that America is facing.

      Here at Jihad Watch, for the most part, we simply discuss symptoms, not the root cause of the problem,

      I think the root cause is Spiritual.

      Using Europe as an example, how has abandoning Christianity and replacing it with Secular Humanism worked out for them? I understand in Great Britain that many Christian Churches have closed down due to the lack of attendance and some are now Mosques, while others have become commercial property.

      In addition, Europe is being overrun by Islam through Immigration and birth rate.

      The current native European replacement rate averages 1.5 vs the 2.1 per woman needed to replace the native population while the Islamic replacement rate is approximately 4.5 per woman, well, that doesn’t bode well for the native Europeans.

      In the passages below, replace Nineveh with the U.S.A. and Jonah with Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, Joel Rosenberg, Dr. David Reagan, Dr. Mark Hitchcock, or any other sound Bible teacher who is speaking out as Jonah did.

      “Then the word of the LORD came to Jonah the second time, saying,

      “Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and call out against it the message that I tell you.”

      So Jonah arose and went to Nineveh, according to the word of the LORD. Now Nineveh was an exceedingly great city, three days’ journey in breadth

      Jonah began to go into the city, going a day’s journey. And he called out, “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!”

      And the people of Nineveh believed God. They called for a fast and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them to the least of them.

      The word reached the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, removed his robe, covered himself with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.

      And he issued a proclamation and published through Nineveh, “By the decree of the king and his nobles: Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything. Let them not feed or drink water,

      but let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and let them call out mightily to God. Let everyone turn from his evil way and from the violence that is in his hands.

      Who knows? God may turn and relent and turn from his fierce anger, so that we may not perish.”

      When God saw what they did, how they turned from their evil way, God relented of the disaster that he had said he would do to them, and he did not do it.”
      – Jonah Chapter 3

      How much time is remaining for those of us in the U.S.A.?

      • Mark Swan says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 11:05 pm

        Not Much, at all.

      • Mirren10 says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 8:28 am

        Do you really think wearing a sack, not eating, and daubing oneself with ashes is going to stop the global jihad ?

        • Carolyne says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 11:22 am

          For myself, I think the interspersing of Hillary Clinton’s faults within the treatise was just the right touch. She is, indeed, as described and reminding the reader of this fact several times is genius.

        • Carolyne says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 11:33 am

          I don’t know any Christians who wear a sack, but I have noticed that many Muslim women walk around in black garbage bags. Garbage in, garbage out.

          While I am an Atheist, I understand that Christians draw some comfort from as you say ,daubing with ashes, but we need much more than that, We need to stand up and fight these barbarians and not wait for Jesus to do it for us.

          I have often wondered that if God created man, who created God? Man?

      • Mubarak says

        Oct 17, 2016 at 2:25 am

        God as the judge of the earth and Islam as his scourge is not a popular subject here in the comment section or anywhere. Neither is repentance as the adequate response. Interestingly repentance began with Jonah in this story.

    • Richard Hallin says

      Oct 17, 2016 at 7:26 am

      Billy bob, I too was questioning the continued use of the statement regarding Trump, but if you read the actual wording each instance is different to all the others. I feel this has been put in there to show exactly how twisted and false Clintons words are, and that this is to try and show the true facts of her own disgraceful behaviour and outright lies, showing that no matter what untruths and distortions of the truth she makes, this is being totally ignored by the MSM, yet we should all be so concerned by what he said years ago. While making no apology for his remarks, this is unfortunately how many men do discuss women amongst themselves in private, by the same token this also how many women discuss men too, if you don’t believe me ask your sister, how she and her girlfriends talk amongst each other. While I do agree that neither candidate seems to be the ideal, having Clinton in power would only see the US sliding down an even steeper slope towards self destruction than it already has, I believe that even with all his faults Trump is trying to look after the people and US interests first and foremost, this can be clearly seen by the animosity he gets from both political parties, who for so long have had their collective snouts in the public, and big business trough’s, none of whom want someone to be investigating their conduct over the last 20 years, with regard to tax evasion, corruption, cheap labour, etc: the list goes on and on. Unfortunately I think Clinton will probably get in, GOD HELP YOU, as at this stage I think she could go out and kill the firstborn in every house, be shown on TV doing it and her supporters would all yell out TRUMP DID IT.

    • Chris in Texas says

      Oct 17, 2016 at 7:50 am

      The attacks against Trump are the Media’s attempt to deflect any scrutiny of how evil and corrupt Hillary is ! Anyone who thinks different is part of the problem !!
      Trump is the only candidate willing to speak of the ISLAMIC threats to every American !
      Reminding the reader 11 times that the difference between …words that can be offensive to women ……and Actions that end up in the deaths of women are NOT the same …(PC thought will destroy us ! )… is a good way to make his point !
      Trump 2016 !

  10. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 3:17 pm

    When she gets elected, Hillary will be faced with her former negotiating partner: Iran. But the media will minimize blame for the awful outcomes that will inevitably stem fom the “deal” (some already have occurred) and will shift what little blame they ascribe to the “deal” not to President Hillary but to John Kerry. It would be racist to lay it on the actual fool, Prez Barack Hussein. Politics and foreign policy are so complicated. At least Prez Hussein makes the politics part look simple.

  11. Mubarak says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 pm

    Hillary Clinton has been hoodwinked and metaphorically raped by Muslims. She is an innocent victim, she didn’t deserve it and should not be blamed for it or held accountable.

    • Champ says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:44 pm

      Are you being sarcastic?

      If not, then I disagree …

      For instance, muslims have tried to “hoodwink” Robert Spencer and have completely failed.

      So Clinton in not “an innocent victim” as you allege.

      And I wish that Robert Spencer were running for president instead of her. Hey I can wish …

      • Mubarak says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 4:46 pm

        Money makes Hillary Clinton’s world go round and her around the world and most important: it makes the world go around her.

        • Mubarak says

          Oct 15, 2016 at 4:50 pm

          PS: “her” = HER

      • Carolyne says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 11:24 am

        Hillary Clinton has not been “Hoodwinked.” She knows exactly what she is doing and is paid very well by Middle Eastern potentates for doing it. Bought and paid for.

        • Mark Swan says

          Oct 17, 2016 at 6:10 am

          Yep

    • gravenimage says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:45 pm

      Mubarak wrote:

      Hillary Clinton has been hoodwinked and metaphorically raped by Muslims.
      ………………………

      Metaphorical rape?

      Mubarak lauds our *literal* rape by Muslims:

      Mubarak says
      September 11, 2016 at 5:29 am

      A culture that, as a protest against Muslim rapist, produces young, moronic males in miniskirts – https://youtu.be/lQIdhdQKDCE – doesn’t that culture deserve to be raped?

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/09/italy-expels-muslim-cleric-who-said-islam-fully-incompatible-with-italian-law#comment-1519434

      He believes we deserve rape for the crime of *protesting Muslim rape*.

      He says, earlier in that thread, that we need to be raped by his vile coreligionists to help us focus on the (supposed) sins of the West.

      • Mubarak says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 4:28 pm

        A protest against Islam that finds expression through young men dressed in miniskirts deserves to be rediculed and mocked together with the young “men”, and the effeminate culture they represent deserve to be “raped” and exposed.
        If MALES in Europe would demand that no more mosques are to be built here and that people who adhere to the Muslim religion should not be given entrance, I would be all for it and support it.

        • gravenimage says

          Oct 15, 2016 at 5:08 pm

          What claptrap. Mubarak has demanded that we let in more ravening Muslims, so that they may rape us because we “deserve” it.

          He has also claimed that Muslims are only targeting us because we are so (supposedly) decadent; he has never addressed why it is that Muslims are also raping Infidels–including nuns and children–in places that are socially conservative places.

          The fact is that Muslims have *always* used rape as a weapon–the mores of the victims is immaterial.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:52 pm

      Yeah, it would be unreasonable to expect her to have looked into top aide Huma Abedin’s background, her career of pro-Jihad writings, and more of the same from her brother, mother and father. No, to not be an Islamophobe she put a Jihad backer at the center of the nation’s foreign policy and closely held espionage secrets and even military secrets. Hillary can’t be blamed for that; to do so would be sexist.

      • Mubarak says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 4:30 pm

        ?

      • Carolyne says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 11:37 am

        Or it could be “Pillow talk.” Huma must be really good although Carlos Danger apparently didn’t think so.

  12. Mirren10 says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 3:37 pm

    ”But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape.”

    Possibly not. She did, however, speak on tape about how she got off a rapist who had raped a twelve year old girl, even though she knew he was guilty. Then she *laughed* She is an evil. evil woman.

    Question: If Americans vote this evil bitch in as President of the US, will America be finished ?

    • Linde Barrera says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:50 pm

      Excellent question, Mirren10. I think the US will be finished as a sovereign republic. And I pray daily that Hillary does not get elected. I am a die hard fan of Ted Cruz, a US Constitutionalist, but since he is not on the ballot, Trump gets my vote because he is the lesser of 2 evils. And evil is evil. But I will take the lesser one.

      • DFD says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 5:43 pm

        Hi Linda, also, Graven, Angemon, Wellington, and all:

        here’s an interesting/entertaining fotomontage of German politicians, commonly known as ‘people traitors’, in the dock. First row, spot Angela, Hillaries busom pal.

        the pictures is obviously nationalistic (of those Germans….) since Hillary, Obama, Sakozy, Hollande, etc are missing. But then we can dream about a better, more encompassing future, can’t we – and strive for it!

        Incidentally, In think Trump is becoming more and more realistic, if I were American I’d vote for him.

        Here’s the link to the picture mentioned: http://pi-news.net/wp/uploads/2016/10/nuernberg_prozess-440×394.jpg

        Best
        DFD

        • gravenimage says

          Oct 15, 2016 at 11:12 pm

          Hi, DFD. That image photoshopped was from this picture of Nazis on trial at Nuremberg:

          http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/leading-nazis-in-the-dock-in-the-courtroom-at-nuremberg-during-the-picture-id2673561

        • Linde Barrera says

          Oct 15, 2016 at 11:53 pm

          To gravenimage- Thank you for your comment of 11:12 pm, Oct. 15, 2016 to DFD where you provide the link to the authentic photo of the Nurnberg trial from history. We can always count on you, graven, to get us to the genuine truth. God bless you my dear lady. From your friend, Linde.

        • DFD says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 4:58 am

          Good God!!!!!!
          ——————-

          That picture was published as satire, fun, and past on by me as the same, namely

          SATIRE !!!!
          =========

          Who would have guessed where it really was from, WHo I ask could have guessed that it was from those Nurnbeg trials; who on earth could have guessed that? – impossible to fathom such deep truthssss, posting becomess less and less worth one’s time

          Oh brother, what a waste….

        • Linde Barrera says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 7:27 am

          To DFD- As per your 4:58 am, Oct. 16, 2016 comment, you did not do anything wrong. You seem annoyed, though. Speaking for myself, I do not understand satire and sarcasm unless I am conversing with a person face to face. Sarcasm on this site goes over my head since this is a free speech site and I believe people can post what they want to. However, their intentions are not always clear to me. My background is as an elementary school teacher. Therefore, in the context of this site/setting, with a following of people from many nations, it would be best if all of us spelled it out and did not use saecasm. Just sayin’. All the best DFD, I do like your posts.

    • Yohanan says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 9:37 am

      Mirren10, yes Hillary Clinton also showed her venal principles in a 1978 Arkansas family court when she won a full custody of a daughter over a previous shared custody decision for a politically allied privileged father. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/recent-articles?id=22974

      Clinton’s talk on family values, children’s rights to access both parents and even on feminism is hollow charade for her own interest.

      • Carolyne says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 11:39 am

        Hillary herself is hollow. There is nothing there.

        • Mirren10 says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 2:58 pm

          I wouldn’t describe conscious evil as ‘nothing’.

  13. Xero_G says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 4:19 pm

    Hillary likes any group if the majority of that group historically votes for the Democrat party. Muslims/Jihadists overwhelmingly vote Democrat party so everything else they do is inconsequential to her. Hillary would approve of the Ku Klux Klan or Nazis so long at they were reliable Democrat voters. She has no morals or honor, just insatiable quest for power/votes.

    • Carolyne says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 11:40 am

      And money to enrich herself, her daughter and her good-for-nothing husband.

  14. bobm says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    she’s a coven-ant satanist.. just like islam.

  15. Richard Paulsen says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 5:26 pm

    Once Bill Clinton disappointed me by saying that Europe is swarming with islamophobes.
    A terrible thing to say, regarding what has happened in Europe and U.S.A. and all over the world since then.
    Hillary Clinton called Trump supporters deplorables.
    The way the Clinton supporters today and during all the presidential campaign insulted Donald Trump and his family is just worthy of detest.
    They are insulting him and his family and supporters, no one insults Hillary Clinton, the Clinton family or their supporters.
    Does any one really believe in the pathetic stories, pathetic journalists and the pathetic Clinton campaign are cooking up against Donald Trump? No normal person can.
    Hope the voters will not believe the lies. The Clinton campaign has lost its way. If there ever was one.

  16. August West says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 5:53 pm

    Right now at the Ministry of Truth Winston Smith is busy with his speak write changing the enemy to Russia.

    The enemy is and always has been Russia.
    We have always been at war with Russia.

    All references to war with anybody but Russia is being flushed right down the memory hole.

    The new Emmanuel Goldstein is Putin.

    Rum and cigar rations from Cuba have just been increased.

    When I read 1984 I thought it was a nightmare. Obama et al view it as a playbook.

  17. Wellington says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 6:15 pm

    Hillary Clinton is an even greater menace to the First and Second Amendments to the Constitution than is Barack Obama. If elected President she will appoint to the federal bench extremely liberal justices who will shred the First Amendment guarantee of free speech by way of “allowing” free speech but not hate speech. Such a bogus distinction, which has occurred in one Western European nation after another, is a guarantee of the ending of free speech. And such a bogus distinction already exists in America where modern liberals (call them leftists if you like) are most in control——at colleges and universities, which have become centers of leftist indoctrination rather than centers of true education.

    As for the Second Amendment, she will do her best to end gun ownership by American citizens by way of another bogus distinction propounded by the Left, to wit, that the “militia” mentioned in the Second Amendment is to be distinguished from the “people.” But the militia and the people are one and the same as is crystal clear from the exact words of the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Nevertheless, modern liberals aplenty very much wish to draw a distinction between the militia and the people for the purpose of ending gun ownership. It is stupid and deceitful in the extreme, but then Leftism is stupid and deceitful in the extreme, and so how fitting.

    Hillary Clinton is a vile, vicious, corrupt and extremely foolish human being. But the real problem isn’t her. Nope, the real problem are all the millions who will vote for this horrible excuse of an American. The sin upon their heads forever for doing so.

    And whatever faults Trump has, and he has his share and then some, he won’t gut the First and Second Amendments, and he won’t do other wretched things like letting in millions of more Muslims, adherents of the oldest and best disguised totalitarian ideology of all time. By contrast, the Bitch will let in millions of Muzzies and many others who care not all that what made America great in the first place was liberty and limited government. Indeed, like Hillary Clinton herself, such immigrants want to end liberty and limited government, that is what’s left of both. Count on it.

    • Carolyne says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 11:45 am

      And what you say, Wellington, is the most serious danger of all in electing Hillary Clinton.

  18. Jorge abuauad says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 6:47 pm

    Clinton want war with Russia she is a demon

  19. Linde Barrera says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 7:00 pm

    To DFD- Thank you for your comment of 5:43 pm, Oct. 15, 2016 and the link to the photo of Angela Merkel. I was speaking to my Aunt who is 80 and lives in Florida (I am in Brooklyn, NY) last week. She was born in Germany in 1936 and was a girl during WWII in Germany. She is a bitter person from the experience. Anyway, we were talking about the 1 million Muslims that Angela Merkel allowed into Germany this past year. I said I believed with all my heart that Angela Merkel got paid off by the Saudis or took Muslim millions from somebody to do such a crazy thing. My Aunt said: “No, she did not. Angela Merkel really believes in her heart that Germans must help Muslims. and they must learn German and be integrated into German society.” So then I brought up the 500 rape/assault cases in Koln (which she knew about) and said “What was done in Koln is the Islamic way of integrating into the host society.” ??? Take good care DFD.

  20. Kepha says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 7:13 pm

    It speaks poorly of America, and especially the GOP, that Shrillary Shroooooo’s misdeeds and the O [mal-]administration’s politicization of the IRS and FBI have not blown up into something even larger than Watergate. Shrillary Shroooooo is a Nixon in pantsuits who, unhappily, will get away with her misdeeds. America, thy name is mud

    Uncle Kepha,
    American patriot in mourning

    • Wellington says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 7:34 pm

      On the specific matter of the GOP, Kepha, said political party, while having far better ideas than does the Democratic Party, which is not hard to do since the Democratic Party is replete with bad ideas, examples being profit sharing (pure socialism), equal pay for equal work (a route to far more inefficient government control of the economy), and the contention that Obama’s Iran deal is a “winner” when it is anything but, has lost it collective guts.

      How pathetic, I would argue. And the “poster boy” here for such timidity is Paul Ryan, a political wuss if ever there were one. Again I assert here at JW that the Democrats have lost their collective mind and the Republicans have lost their collective guts. Not a good combo for the preservation of freedom in America and other good things. Meanwhile, the Islamic world, the Russians, the Chinese and others on the wrong side of history have taken note of just how putrid both major political parties in America have become, though for different reasons of course.

      Stupid world we live in. No contest here.

      • Kepha says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 8:39 pm

        No longer the Grand Old Party, but the Goofy, Odiferous ,Old Pus (GOOP)–something soft, squishy, and batsh-t ugly.

  21. American Pragmatism says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 9:30 pm

    IMPORTANT: Wikileaks email shows John Podesta talking to Steve Elmendorf before Justice A. Scalia Murder

    “Didn’t think wet work meant pool parties at the Vineyard”

    Steve Elmendorf responds:

    ” I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite, we all need to buckle up and double down. “

  22. Jay Boo says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 11:27 pm

    LGBT Hillary

    Hillary told gays that she was on their side.
    Orlando proved otherwise.
    Go on gays climb under her MSM coronation bus.
    Hillary says compared to Muslims you are not worth nearly as much.

    She doesn’t ever bother to campaign.
    The MSM hides her small crowds anyway.

  23. bleeps says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 2:13 am

    Someone tell to these Libanese there is no fun in Islam! I bet there could be a brawl with the certain death at a wedding somewhere there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGN2uWS2iKs&ab_channel=%D8%B2%D9%88%D9%85%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A8ZoomTube

  24. tgusa says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 2:30 am

    First and foremost the democrat party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the global jihad. For years, yes decades they took their money and they very well know that to keep their heads they must produce what these foreign enemies expect. The democrats are willing to sell us all out, they have no other choice. What we are witnessing is them in their survival mode. I think that they are realizing just how ugly it can and will get.

    When we see them begin to fall we will know that the tide has turned and their foreign masters have given up on them. There will be a cleaning of those westerners who know too much and many of them will yell, fellow Americans we need your help! Unfortunately they really don’t deserve our help and so I am still on the fence regarding that. It is not too late to come clean, admit your folly, but the time for that grows short.

  25. Praeceptor Maximus says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 4:31 am

    To anyone critical of Trump, please watch these videos by Jon Voight.

    https://youtu.be/DDlO50aQmuI
    BAM !! KNOCKOUT : Patriot Jon Voight DESTROYS George Soros, Crooked Hillary and Black Lives Matter

    https://youtu.be/DbpGN27DfTw
    Jon Voight on why he’s supporting Trump and Hollywood isn’t

    Trump is the only chance America has for freedom.

    • Praeceptor Maximus says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 4:32 am

      The last comment is mine and not Jon Voight.

      • Carolyne says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 12:05 pm

        And I agree with your last comment.

    • Chris in Texas says

      Oct 19, 2016 at 7:34 am

      But Trump left the toilet seat up on an airliner back in 1979 …?
      (Sarcasm !)

  26. duj swami says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 6:26 am

    It’s amazing that anyone supports this blood stained, crime stained woman…

  27. duj swami says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 6:32 am

    Tolstoy said it…’The good cannot seek power nor retain it,,,to do that men (women) must love power, and love of power has the opposite qualities of goodness, Pride, cunning, and cruelty’…

    Both she and Trump have pride and cunning, but only one of them is cruel…

    • Praeceptor Maximus says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 6:43 am

      Hillary. Her records all too clearly testify to her cruelty. I used to think that she was America’s Nero. I have since revised that view. She is America’s Caligula. Not only she is a career criminal, she is also mentally deranged.

  28. Kasey says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 6:57 am

    Can you imagine two Clintons back in the White House?

    Except this time the same guy is likely to run the show again but from behind the scene while the other plays at being President. As for all that Foundation money left to play with, what might really happen to it if the FBI actually gets into it and investigate it properly?.

  29. Joe says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 7:52 am

    Benghazi still stinks more than what this article had time to explain. One of men of the security forces, hired by Clinton’s State Department, was the last person who saw ambassador Stevens alive. He was in a safe room with its own ventilation. The safe room was completely closed. No one could get into the safe room, at least not within minutes. The security man, said that the safe room began to fill up with smoke, and he left through a hatch in the roof. Why did the safe room fill with smoke? Was it because Stevens was incapacitated by being physically restrained or mentally unconscious. And then the USA contractor through a smoke grenade into the room before climbing out to the roof? It sure seems that way.

    The only reason most of the staff were rescued, was because someone at the CIA was making phone calls to military groups in the area. A group that was loyal to Gaddafi were the ones who came to the rescue. We had military in the Mediterranean that could have been there in minutes, but they were ordered to stand down. Even after 13 hours, no US military help was on the way.

    After the attack, no investigation was carried out for 6 months.

    The group that attacked had previously been hired by the USA, but I don’t know who was paying them on the night of the attack. It is not likely that they were working for nothing.

  30. Fred says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 9:22 am

    Donald Trump can win if he will focus on these issues + securing the border, growing the economy, creating jobs, cutting taxes & regulations, and ending Obamacare. And quit playing in the mud!

  31. Florida Jim says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 11:17 am

    The Democrats have walked away from God centuries ago and He will not forgive them for their foul and cruel deeds.Democrats have been flooding america with immigrants and illegals for decades packing the hellholes they created for them to steal election after election it is time they paid up and were vote out by their slaves.

  32. Richard Paulsen says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 12:07 pm

    Am sure all Christianity is praying for the lost sheep. Praying she will change her mind like Paulus once.

  33. Paul Clark says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 12:59 pm

    One time someone responded to a comment that I had written, saying that the commenters on Jihad Watch are very diverse: Various religions, atheists, liberals, conservatives and moderates. If here is ever a time for all of us to come together, it is November 8.

    Trump was not my first choice, but now he is the only choice I have left. Hillary is a tyrant. Her political and personal history has proven that. Her and Bama’s many successful attempts to politicize almost every department in government has corrupted our government: State Department, DOJ , FBI, IRS, CIA, ATF, etc. Not only will she, but she has said done diverse and divers of things to prove this. The tremendous aid she has provided Islam is incalculable. Only two things matter to her and you are not one of them: Greed and Power.

  34. Paul Clark says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 1:34 pm

    Mubarak suggests an Islam rapist is defining his manhood. I wonder if he and others once reaching “paradise” will have sex with a nine year old, male or female, virgins. I suggest none of these cowardly Islamic murderers are men, including Mubarak. I suspect he will be first in line to practice his filthy Islamic perversion. I suspect he is not man enough to persuade anyone to have an legitimate romance with him. No other religion is based on such depravity, evil and filthiness, not even the most heathen pagans extended their evil throughout the globe to murder and rape.

    • Ron says

      Oct 16, 2016 at 3:20 pm

      Well said and true.

  35. Raymond Peringer says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 3:15 pm

    Democracy has descended to the point where we no longer vote for the candidate we admire most, or even admire ordinary. We now vote for the candidate we dislike least, distrust least and hate least. Even with those criteria, the choice is difficult.

    This election clearly signals the final stage of the decline of our civilization. In the penultimate stage, we lost the virtue and zeal to work and contribute to the growth of society. We are slowly giving back the people’s power into a form of centralization. In North America that centralization is financial, where a handful of money moguls now determine our standard of living.

  36. Ron says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    Any person who denies the cause and effect relationship between Islam and terrorism is either lying or incredibly ignorant. Hillary is lying

  37. Al says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    In suggesting ‘high government officials’ have verified Russian involvement in WikiLeaks revelations, which ‘high government officials’ are we talking about? Those in the IRS, FBI, Justice Dept., State Dept., the Pentagon, or Obama’s Executive minions have all demonstrated the willingness to lie and cover up. When are they going to build a monument of Saul Alinsky and is it true they’re going to put it in between Lincoln and Washington. The no shame of unrighteousness has no boundaries.

  38. RL Robison says

    Oct 16, 2016 at 8:07 pm

    Hillary’s is using Trump’s stupid remarks (which many men indulge in) to anger women to blindness and obfuscate the real issues of this election. So America must choose between a loose lipped, spoiled braggart and a devious, lying, power hungry and very real danger to this country. Neither political party has anything to be proud of in this election cycle.

  39. duj swami says

    Oct 17, 2016 at 4:33 am

    Hillary on Qaddafi…’We cane, we saw, he died’…grin, laughter…

    Man that was funny…at least she has a sense of humor…

  40. Ali Bey says

    Oct 17, 2016 at 7:36 am

    In spite of the campaign of females who say that Trump tried to abuse them, I think that the presumption of inocence must prevail since Trump has not been condemned by any Tribunal. Certainly Clinton has also not been condemned (yet) by her scandals but her misbehaviours and lies are obvious and publicly proved. The possible election of Clinton as President makes me think the advent of a political dynasty to be passed to the Clinton-Clinton descendants.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Mojdeh on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.