What could possibly go wrong? Let’s let Hillary tell us. My latest in FrontPage:
The Washington Examiner reported last week that “at 42.4 million, there are now more immigrants, legal and illegal, in America than ever before, fueled by a massive flood from Muslim nations….And while the doors remain open on the U.S.-Mexico border, the biggest percentage increases in immigration are all from largely Muslim nations.” What could possibly go wrong? Hillary Clinton knows, as she revealed in a 2013 email that makes her current public position on immigration absolutely inexplicable.
The Examiner added that according to Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler of the Center for Immigration Studies: “The sending countries with the largest percentage increases in immigrants living in the United States from 2010 to 2014 were Saudi Arabia (up 93 percent), Bangladesh (up 37 percent), Iraq (up 36 percent), Egypt (up 25 percent), and Pakistan, India, and Ethiopia (each up 24 percent).”
Hillary Clinton, despite her determination to increase the number of Syrian refugees entering the United States by 550%, knows very well the risks involved in this massive influx of Muslim immigrants, and in her scheme to increase their number even more. The Daily Caller reported Monday that “in a private 2013 speech, Hillary Clinton worried about the risk of ‘jihadists’ entering Jordan with ‘legitimate refugees’ because ‘they can’t possibly vet all those refugees.’”
Clinton said in a speech before the Jewish United Fund Of Metropolitan Chicago: “So I think you’re right to have gone to the places that you visited because there’s a discussion going on now across the region to try to see where there might be common ground to deal with the threat posed by extremism, and particularly with Syria, which has everyone quite worried, Jordan because it’s on their border and they have hundreds of thousands of refugees and they can’t possibly vet all those refugees. So they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees. Turkey for the same reason.”
Clinton vowed during her second presidential debate with Donald Trump: “I will not let anyone into our country that I think poses a risk to us.” So she apparently believes that while Jordan and Turkey cannot vet the refugees and winnow out the jihadis from among peaceful Muslims, the United States government under a Hillary Clinton administration will be able to do so.
This is an extraordinary claim: two Muslim nations are unable to distinguish jihadis from peaceful Muslims, but a non-Muslim nation will be able to do so? Hillary Clinton could only advance such a proposition in a world in which non-Muslim spokesmen such as John Kerry, David Cameron and Pope Francis pronounce confidently and authoritatively on the nature of Islam, blithely contradicting Islamic law and theological consensus, as well as the closely-argued Qur’anic exegeses of numerous jihad leaders, in telling us that Islam is a religion of peace that rejects every form of violence. Clinton herself has declared: “Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”
Since she is so sure that she knows all about Islam and Muslims, Clinton is doubtless sure that she will be able to ensure that U.S. immigration and refugee authorities “will not let anyone into our country that I think poses a risk to us.” Yet when she makes statements so divorced from reality as her claim that Muslims “have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism,” she doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that those whom she thinks pose a risk to us will be those who actually do pose a risk to us.
Even worse, when as far back as three years ago, she indicated that she had some idea of the difficulty even for Muslim countries to vet the refugees properly, her advocacy of a steep increase in Muslim immigration is, at very least, astonishingly irresponsible. Her position appears to be based on a toxic combination of willful ignorance and hubris – toxic not for her presidential chances, but for the possibility that a Hillary Clinton presidency would be anything other than an unmitigated disaster for the United States.

No Fear says
Hijrah.
Angemon says
Yes.
DFD says
I wonder if you have these family re-union schemes/laws/rules/regulations as we do in the EU, I wouldn’t be surprised. If you do, expect about 5-8 **per** Muhajeeroun (Hijrian) coming, they want to be re-united with him. Thus multiply the number by 5 to 8. Most of these wives and children, producing more and more….Errrr, voters? The “family re-union” is usually paid for by the state, humanitarian thingy. That means they will be flown in, and be immediately part of the welfare arrangements. That in turn means you’ll pay for the wife(s) and children.
In Germany they’re (yes, the Merkel regime!) debating the polygamy law, that it needs extending to existing Muslim marriages – against the humanitarian concerns and wishes of the ‘greens’ and the other socialists.
Background: There’s a guy with four wives and 17 or 18 kids. He draws annually €250,000.00 in benefits, roughly the same in these $$$$$$ones… You read that correctly, two-five-zero-thousand per year….
Hang on to your wallets!
PS: What do you think, are welfare payments part of the jazyia/tribute, or will this have to be paid extra, good question, no?
Allan says
You should know that your civilization is doomed when its leaders are too stupid, or too crooked, to deter the adherents of a cult which has been an aggressor for more than 1,000 yrs.
le mouron rouge says
The real problem is a Spiritual.
http://newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul292.htm
This from Joel Rosenberg’s blog:
Some thoughts on a presidential campaign going from bad to worse to nightmarish.
https://flashtrafficblog.wordpress.com/
Johan elzinga says
One statistic that is relatively trustworthy is the prediction of the Dutch government statistics bureau. Extrapolating the current trends on demography, it can be deduced that around 2060 the majority of all big cities in the Netherlands will be immigrant of origine. That is, if and only if no new waves of immigrants enter this country. It has been argued by our very own trade unions (who represent blue and white collar workers) already in the nineties that for big cities to be able to sustain themselves, a reasonable fraction of its inhabitants should have both a job and a proper education. A mammoth task in itself. I personnally expect that a dangerous toppling point is reached at 35 or 40 percent immigrants, when their background is as primitive on average as is the case today.
CrossWare says
Military preparation for Green Dawn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQpzB-GxU0A
Stephanie says
A L L illegale invaders(on one’s own initiative) have NO right to asyl to Art 16a(2) constitution
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0088
“…
(2) Paragraph (1) of this Article may not be invoked by a person who enters the federal territory from a member state of the European Communities or from another third state in which application of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is assured. …”
Michael Copeland says
“We are at war against radical jihadists….” – Hillary Clinton.
Memo:
Jihad is part of only one ideology, one where it is an obligation.
Michael Copeland says
P.S. There are no “non-radical” jihadists.
Jihad is a ROOT (“radical”, from Latin RADIX) part of Islam.
Jaladhi says
Exactly, what the hell is radical jihadist as opposed to non-radical jihadist? It seems that they add the word “radical” to separate other “good” jihadis as if there are any good jihadis. Don’t they know all jihad is violent as taught in Quran! This shows the utter stupidity of our so called “leaders”! They are either totally stupid or they know the real Islam and are cunning as a fox to impose Muslims and Islam on us.
Allan says
No, they don’t know that “all jihad is violent”, and neither do you. Some jihad is the lesser, and some jihad, the greater.
Jack Diamond says
The good jihadis are, for instance, the Muslim Brotherhood, whom she partnered with. Stealth jihad, good jihad. Rifle and bomb jihad–radical jihadists–bad jihad. Violent jihadists who overthrow regimes she wants overthrown? Back to being good jihadists.
Jihad is anything that removes the obstacles to the spread of Islam and its rule. Violent jihad is its highest manifestation, bringing the greatest reward, and is the ultimate insurer of Islamic domination, but there is a whale of “non-violent” forms of jihad alternatives in the meantime. In that obligatory war till the Day of Judgment against non-Muslims, a zero-sum game.
Jaladhi says
Go to any Islamic country such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia( where the people think they are the guardians of Islam) and ask any Muslim on the street the meaning of jihad – and you will get only one answer jihad is holy war against infidels to spread Islam. I guess “holy wars” aren’t violent per our Western experts and leaders. Ha, ha,..LOL. So much for greater and lesser jihad which are contrived by Westerners and Muslim apologists. Common men in Islamic countries don’t indulge in intellectual curiosity of Westerners and they call jihad for what it is! No PC here!
Allan says
From Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 43:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
(That she said), “O Allah’s Apostle! We consider Jihad as the best deed. Should we not fight in Allah’s Cause?” He said, “The best Jihad (for women) is Hajj-Mabrur (i.e. Hajj which is done according to the Prophet’s tradition and is accepted by Allah).”
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/052-sbt.php
http://muwasala.org/what-is-meant-by-hajj-mabrur/
Jack Diamond says
Well, you know what? When the enemy has “invaded Muslim land”(interpretation), fighting becomes obligatory, even for women. Have you noticed women not reluctant to stab, shoot, or blow themselves up lately? Do you know that Aisha, Muhammad’s favorite wife and a role model for Muslimas, led an army to avenge the murder of Caliph ‘Uthman and had 600 of the rebels beheaded? Why didn’t she just go on a pilgrimage? Maybe we can play word games with “jihad/struggle”and how many uses Muslims have for it (even though the controlling definition in Islamic law is ‘warfare against non-Muslims’) but how about “qital” which is the term often used in the famous jihad verses of the Qur’an? It only means killing. Is there a way of killing that is not violent?
“it says in Khishshaaf al-Qinaa’ (3/26): Women are not allowed (to engage in jihad) because they are a source of temptation, as well as not being qualified to fight, because of their natural tendency to be weak and cowardly, and because there is no guarantee that the enemy will not capture them and regard it as permissible to do to them that which Allaah has forbidden. Some of the scholars said: except the wife of the ruler or commander, who may be present to attend to his needs, because of the actions of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), or an old women in cases of need only, such as giving water to the troops and treating the wounded, because al-Rubayyi’ bint Mu’awwidh said: “We used to go out to fight with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), bringing water and serving them, bringing back the wounded and the slain to Madeenah.”
All of this has to do with jihad in cases where the enemy has not invaded the Muslim land, in which case jihad becomes obligatory on every able-bodied person, man or woman, and a woman may then go out without her husband’s permission. Al-Kaasaani al-Hanafi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “But at times of general mobilization, such as when the enemy is seeking to invade a Muslim land, then it becomes an individual obligation (fard ‘ayn) on every single Muslim who is able to fight, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor)”
https://islamqa.info/en/45618
Women aren’t to be in combat because they are weak and cowardly, a source of temptation, and the enemy might get to enjoy them. Except in defensive jihad when women can and must fight too. Jihad as in fight in Allah’s cause….
Baucent says
This woman is a chameleon, changing her position to suit the particular audience. Who really knows what she believes as she will say anything to get elected. Is she a socialist like Sanders? That seems unlikely, a champagne socialist perhaps who likes to talk about equality while traveling by Lear Jet. But she doesn’t seem to be an ideologue like Obama.
Charli Main says
A plague of Muslim locusts sweeping over green and pleasant, non Muslim lands. All with one objective—–to destroy everything non- Muslim in its path.
Michael Copeland says
POPULATION REPLACEMENT ARMY
Caption for photograph above
rubiconcrest says
There has been virtually no explanation of the ‘genesis of a jihadist’ by our politicians. Who does the recruiting? How do the recruiters know who to approach? What role does Sharia play? etc…. etc…
kessler says
The fact that she showed concern for Jordan accepting unvetted Muslims and oppose a strong stance on Muslim immigration into the US, shows how two-faced she is.
“I will not let anyone into our country that I think poses a risk to us.” – Trump – PLEASE ask exactly how she is going to ensure Muslims entering US oppose Sharia law, support freedom of speech including the right to criticise/satire any religious figure, gender, sexual, religious equality etc.
When is Trump going to put her on the spot? Does he even take note of this? He could absolutely demolish her in the debates, but either due to ignorance, or dare I say, stupidity, he is not capable of hitting a home run. There are so many stains on Clinton – including her destructive foreign policy – which should make it easy to tear her down. But it’s not happening. A simple question – “how did your intervention in Libya/removal of Ghaddafi help to ensure peace and stability in the region” – it would open up a can of worms.
Trump need to up the game – fast. The endless bickering about the clinton sex scandal is not helping him. It’s pathetic. There are far bigger issues.
Waiting/hoping for the Trump card which will demolish her, but it may be too late.
c matt says
Well, there is one debate left. Probably the one most will remember, the previous two being water under the bridge. Any good candidate would save the best ammo for last. I expect a lot of Friday/Saturday stink bombs released from both sides leading up to the debate. Would be fun, if the end of the world wasn’t in the balance.
VampireJack says
This has all been planned by the so-called Elite.
The New World Order is providing it’s One World Religion.
CrossWare says
You are absolutely right! They want an ideology which is capable to keep the masses in their slave state indefinitely. Suppressing army and police is expensive and can turn on their masters. However keeping the population low IQ and fanatic will do the job. They only need a small member of servant class to maintain the technology (kept in fear with the Muslim mob) and voila here comes the New World Order.
Praeceptor Maximus says
Quran – 47:1-2. Those who reject Allah and hinder (men) from the Path of Allah,- their deeds will Allah render astray (from their mark). But those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad – for it is the Truth from their Lord,- He will remove from them their ills and improve their condition.
According to this verse, the lot of Muslims should be wonderful and the lot of non-Muslims should be the worst, and yet it is the Muslim countries that have the worst living conditions. Brutal dictatorships, constant sectarian wars, disease, illiteracy, high mortality rate and poverty. There is no progress in Islamic countries because Islam does not advocate progress, only ignorance For 1400 years Islam has been engaged in keeping its subjects in a state of barbarity. And now the western leadership has decided to import these barbarians into the west. Never before in the history of mankind there has ever been a nation or a civilization that was so determined on self-destruction.
PRCS says
“Since she is so sure that she knows all about Islam and Muslims, Clinton is doubtless sure that she will be able to ensure that U.S. immigration and refugee authorities “will not let anyone into our country that I think poses a risk to us.” Yet when she makes statements so divorced from reality as her claim that Muslims “have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism,” she doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that those whom she thinks pose a risk to us will be those who actually do pose a risk to us.”
I disagree. those two conflicting statements of hers do not merely fail to inspire confidence that those whom she thinks will pose a risk to us will be prevented from coming here, it guarantees that they will be.
But Trump’s crew won’t press her on this, as they apparently don’t want to offend that “all important” Muslim voting bloc, either.
PRCS says
that they will be allowed to
duh swami says
The ‘La Paz’ agreement signed into LAW by Reagan, calls for a 60 mile wide ‘international free trade zone] from ocean to gulf…That’s 30 miles one each side of the border…Anyone can come and go from either side…That erases the border, making Donald’s wall illegal…
Keys says
Why can’t you have a wall ? Those wanting to get in to the “free trade” zone just have to enter properly (openly, documented, with proper id, on video, etc).
mortimer says
Robert Spencer wrote: “This is an extraordinary claim: two Muslim nations are unable to distinguish jihadis from peaceful Muslims, but a non-Muslim nation will be able to do so?”
Perfectly expressed!
Hillary believes she knows more than all the Islamic scholars and Muslim police in Turkey and Jordan and Syria put together. Preposterously, and without reading one of the Islamic sources texts of Islam or Sharia law, Hillary considers herself and presents herself as equipped to make policy about Islamic terrorists! Preposterous charlatan!
Jaladhi says
Its not just Hillary, its all our leaders, media, academia and so called experts who claim they know Islam more than the Muslims who have been practicing it for last 1400 years. What morons we have in the West!
John A. Marre says
Clinton is happy to have them here. It will make Huma Abedin happy, and it will guarantee millions of votes and millions of dollars in contributions.
Rachelle the Patriot says
Ten apartments were rented for Somali refugees here in Wichita, Kansas last month. The government provided them with new furniture even! These are just the ones I have seen with my own eyes. I have no idea how many are here in total. The cost of plane tickets to get them here, the rent and the furniture alone is absolutely mind-boggling. God help us all if Trump is not elected. You are watching this country die by government assisted invasion. And anyone wanting to preserve their way of life is labeled a deplorable.
Zulu says
OT
President Hollande has admitted ‘France has a problem with Islam’ and warned that the country’s national symbol will one day be a woman in a burka
– Hollande said France ‘has a problem with Islam’ in a private conversation
– Said ethnic minority footballers are ‘guys from the estates without values’
– Conversation contained in book called ‘A President Should Not Say That…’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834003/President-Hollande-admitted-France-problem-Islam-warned-country-s-national-symbol-one-day-woman-burka.html#ixzz4MstVPC36
Sam says
I am in Ohio and we can vote early
I am voting for Trump. I hope that will help us start fighting Islam and yes muslims. I am not confident though
robm says
I N V A S I O N ……How else can they “take over the World?”
Ed Lee says
“We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.”
Jay Boo says
Can’t we have a society with peace and love?
Imagine a tolerant multicultural paradise.
We must first build a wall and restrict immigration to keep out those people with hateful intolerant ideologies.
Marty says
The French have a characteristic sadly lacking in the UK”s
alleged intellectuals, patriotism.
The somewhat feeble socialist president is reported, in a new
book of his private conversations of saying this.
“French president Francois Hollande has admitted the country ‘has a problem with Islam’ and warned France’s national symbol will one day by a woman in a burka.”
As a socialist, he seems to recognise that islam is an invasive far right,
beyond Hitler, ideology that is sworn to destroy all that we value.
The leading UK “socialist” is, in fact, a Jew hating muslim loving fool,
who hates the UK, & particularly the blue collar workers.
Allan says
It’s a shame that Hollande isn’t a man with a better sense of humor. If he did, he might have made a quip about the national symbol being a buttery, flaky, viennoiserie-pastry which has been made with dough dyed green and formed into a crescent shape before baking.
It’s by the way that a sharia committee in Aleppo banned the croissant on account of a story about its origin.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/02/syrian-rebels-ban-croissants-in-aleppo/
Holo says
Yesterday I sent a letter to Hillary Clinton by Post as it was just impossible to write to her by e-mail.
I told her how dangerous it was to take in all those Muslims, and I suggested she wtch what was happening in Europe with terrorist attacks being foiled all the time. I told her that in Europe during the last 12 months 270 innocent people have been massacred by Muslim terrorists. I also said how unjust it was to keep taking in Muslims when Christians are suffering genocide and pare being eradicated from Africa to East Asia, and that only 0.4% of migrants taken in by the US were Christians – this in a Judeo-Chritian country. I mentioned that Obama said Muslim terrorism was not rooted in Islam, and explained the over 100 commandments to “kill the infidels” in the Koran.
I can only hope that she will read it.
Sincerely, Holo
Rufolino says
Well done, Holo !
Jay Boo says
Friday is (PERCOLATION) time at the local mosque.
— and still they come
Well behaved and neatly dressed ‘Moderate’ Muslims filter in to the mosque. They begin removing this measured moderation mask with their WUDU wash and a carefully displayed prayer dance. But, after the imam reaches his full PERCOLATION blood brew of Islamic hate disguised as faith the bloodlust frothing at the mouth begins.
Islam has never been a religion.
Islam is an excuse using MO’s personal HO, named Allah, to rape, pillage and murder.
Not every Muslim follow MO’s example but many do.
Hillary and her ‘despicables’ will save us?
She likely calls Orlando a mental illness and San Bernardino a workplace incident but the root cause is as always TRUE Muslims on full Qur’an percolation.
Kumi Ho says
I’m so tired of this. I wish nations would start protecting their borders with live fire. This is an invasion. These people are only coming to get what they think they are owed from other people. Any other time in history and they would have been fought off with prejudice.
RK says
SO ASK U’RSELF WHO “OWNS” HER? YA HOW MUCH MONEY DID SHE GET FROM THESE COUNTRIES!? WAKE UP PEOPLE- WAKE THE HELL UP! WE, YOU, AND/OR OUR COUNTRY DON’T MATTER, ONLY HER EVIL GREED DOES, SHAME ON U IF U VOTE FOR HER! GOD HELP US.