More Islamopandering from Obama. My latest in PJ Media:
Obama came into office amid hopes that America’s racial divisions would become a thing of the past. Instead of healing them, however, Obama has exacerbated them.
Now he is going even further: one of the lasting legacies of his disastrous administration may be the creation of an entirely new “race.”
USA Today reports:
[T]he White House is putting forward a proposal to add a new racial category for people from the Middle East and North Africa under what would be the biggest realignment of federal racial definitions in decades.
If approved, the new designation could appear on census forms in 2020 and could have far-reaching implications for racial identity, anti-discrimination laws and health research.
This new Middle Eastern/North African designation — “MENA” — is being created for the benefit of Muslim Arabs. However, MENA would include Middle Eastern and North African Christians and other non-Muslims, and would exclude Muslims who aren’t Middle Eastern and North African.
It is unclear whether Israeli Jews would be able to claim the MENA race. Certainly, the designation is not being created for their benefit.
For years, those of us who have dared to note how Islamic jihadis invoke the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and to recruit peaceful Muslims have been accused of “racism.” This Big Lie has been repeated incessantly, without any breaking of ranks among the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media. In response, I have repeated more times than I could possibly recall:
What “race” is the jihad mass murder of innocent civilians?
I’ve pointed out just as often that Muslims who believe their god commands them to wage war against, and to subjugate, those who don’t believe as they do come in all races. And that race has nothing to do with their imperatives.
These simple truths have not stopped the charges of “racism,” of course. Those charges have George Soros millions behind them, and a seemingly endless supply of well-paid Leftist and Islamic supremacist operatives eager to repeat them.
But perhaps the difficulty of sustaining this irrational charge over the long-term has caused some concern to this propagandist cabal, as this new Obama initiative would supposedly give that propaganda a better footing.
The new race initiative is advancing amid additional propaganda about Muslim victimhood. Khalid Beydoun, a law professor at the University of Detroit, struck an appropriate victimhood pose when he explained that the new race:
… just aids and facilitates the state’s ability to know where these communities are in a very specific fashion.
As if the point of the new race was to persecute Muslims and other Middle Easterners. Digging even deeper, Beydoun added:
My inclination is to think that individuals who might identify might not check the box for fear of retribution — especially if Trump wins.
Nonetheless, Beydoun acknowledged:
In the grand scheme of things, it’s really a progressive stride forward. But in the broader landscape, it’s taking place in the context of greater animus against Arab Americans, and really, Islamophobia.
In reality, this new designation would be the impetus for Muslims in the U.S. to receive a basket full of perks.
MENA would allow an incoming Hillary Clinton administration, among other things, to enforce “the Voting Rights Act … drawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries” – i.e., to gerrymander districts to exaggerate Muslim voting power.
MENA would establish “federal affirmative action plans … evaluating claims of employment discrimination in employment in the private sector” — i.e., expand Obama administration efforts to establish special preferences and accommodations for Muslims in the workplace.
MENA would help “minority-owned small businesses get federal grants and loans” — i.e., make sure that Muslim-owned businesses get a healthier slice of the federal taxpayer pie….
Read the rest here.

miriamrove says
January now seems to far from now…m
le mouron rouge says
miriamrove ,
The names and faces may change, however, the Ideology remains and that is where the battle is being fought, the battle for the heart, mind and soul of the individual.
“A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the soul of its people.”
– Mahatma Gandhi
Lion of Judah's Cub says
The end of this reign of error (and terror) cannot come soon enough.
Peter Brock says
Okay… What does the Philologist-in-Chief propose to call this “new” race?
Obamatangs? Obamarians? Obamishites? Obamunis?
We can’t be rid of this fool fast enough!
Bradthefuzz says
Obamazoid?
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
Can Congress stop this?
Custos Custodum says
If Hillary makes it into the White House, she will not allow anything under the acronym MENA, or any other name that might remind people of Arkansas in the 1970s and 80s.
Cecilia Ellis says
Good one, Custos Custodum! I have actually driven through Mena, which took about five minutes as I recall. Also guess that’s why Hillary did not adopt the following campaign slogan: “More Hope and Change” …
Tatyana Solovey says
Wishful thinking
Son of the West says
This would not be an awful idea in a perfectly sane world, where people could distinguish between race and religion, racism wasn’t the way to silence those who disagree with you, and where Muslims had not learned to play judo with Western ideals of tolerance and fairness.
In our less than sane world, this is going to be used as yet another club against defenders of Western culture and ideals and conflate race with religion even further in the weak minds that make up most of our “cultural” leaders, and their dim-witted followers.
Sorry to say, this is just going to be another nail in the coffin of Western civilization.
gravenimage says
True, Son of the West.
Tatyana Solovey says
RIP
JOHN SPIELMAN says
before the Obamanation who sits in the Oval office came to power, I thought that there was only ONE race- the human race.
le mouron rouge says
JOHN SPIELMAN,
True.
However, that doesn’t work for the “divide and conquer” strategy of the left.
“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”
– Plato
Kay says
There is only one race, as you said, the human race.
“Race” is a social construct, used for social purposes of gathering or excluding. In our country there are, as Robert noted, perks that come with being a different race. The blather about Trump is just to confuse and sidetrack people. Divide and conquer in a new way.
Walter Sieruk says
How absurd, of course this relates to Islam and would serve as yet another means “To protect Islam from criticized” No matter how mild that criticism might be. To restate the obvious. Islam is not a race. Islam is a religious/ cultural sociological system of tyrannical mind control that has much power over the thoughts and lives of millions of people around the world. It’s no surprise that President Obama would back up that outlandish idea that the above article describes. As for Obama this also leads to the topic that President Obama had made the claim that he is “a Christian.” It’s highly doubtful that his claim of being “a Christian” is true. If for no other reason, that claim is doubtful, is that he wants to divide the state of Israel in two. One part for the Jews and the other part for the Muslim/Arabs, the “Palestinians” who live in the land. For its very obvious that Obama doesn’t take seriously the teachings of Jesus.
For Jesus taught “If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.” Mark 3:24. [N.K.J.V.]
Champ says
obama busy working The Globalist Agenda …
le mouron rouge says
Champ.
True.
The left is systematically implementing Agenda 21, recently changed to Agenda 30.
“The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.”
– Aristotle
Rosewood11 says
This already exists. Where I live, even black people call them “sand-ni666ers”!!!
bobm says
now islam is the full victim race card… that it wasn’t before..at least in this morons eyes..they wil always move the posts and redefine and counterfeit… its the islam way..
davej says
Instead of “race” how about checkboxes for 1) Country of birth, 2) Primary language, and 3) God Worshiped?
This would tell us most of what we want to know.
Allah worshipers are out, BTW, because Allah tells them to destroy us.
JayT says
Oh? I thought a major criteria of setting a category of “race” is it has to be identifiable. As in the use of a DNA test. How then does a DNA test determine you are this new race?
Also, why are we not concerned with how those labeled as such feel? We were concerned enough about the NFL team “Redskins” to have it go to court for a name change, but we aren’t concerned with how say the Egyptians feel about being lumped in the same category as a Ugandan?
Afrocentrists, for example, have tried to push the narrative that King Tut and Cleopatra were black. This was vehemently opposed by officials in the Egyptian government.
So Obama is concerned about “Redskins” but not how the various nations feel about being lumped together?
Well, as you know, the truth is it’s to set the stage for hate crimes. When you denounce someone as being a Muslim Jihadist then it can be deemed a hate crime.
Obama – working hard to put all Americans on their hands and knees facing Mecca…….
Wellington says
Just one more example of harm, in this instance still in the proposal stage, that this wretched man, Obama, has done to the American Republic. No one in all of American history, whether American or non-American, had done more damage to America than has Obama. No one.
He has piled up as much debt as all other Presidents combined. He has, as Robert Spencer mentioned above, exacerbated racial divisions, He has had a pathetic foreign policy, including abandoning Poland and the Czech Republic on a limited missile defense, cravenly backing down and doing nothing after the red line he set for the Assad regime in Syria was crossed, and making arguably the most putrid, stupid and pusillanimous deal any President has made with a foreign country; I am here of course referring to his deal with Iran on nuclear weaponry. The man has also interfered in ongoing legal cases, examples being the Trayvon Martin affair and what happened in Ferguson, Missouri, which he had no business doing since it represented unwarranted interference by the executive branch into the judicial branch’s domain. He has by way of his appalling health care plan insured that tens of millions of Americans pay far more for their health insurance. His overall incompetence on economic matters has made him the ONLY President in American history who will not see at least 3% GDP growth in at least one year of his tenure as President. He has gutted the American military to a point that no American President in modern times has. He has been kind to the cruel (e.g., Cuba) and cruel to the kind (e.g., Israel). He has proposed (with Egypt) criminalizing criticism of religion by way of UN resolution 16/18, thus contravening the First Amendment to the American Constitution regarding free speech. And he has made excuse after excuse after excuse for the worst religion mankind ever developed——–Islam.
Above is just the “short list” of Obama’s wrongdoings, betrayals and stupidities. But I think I have indicated enough for now. Yes indeed, a harmful, wretched and foolish man——-for America certainly and by extension for all of Western Civilization, a civilization which pioneered more rights than any other civilization in history and which is also the most inventive civilization ever.
Not that Obama gets any of this. But bitterly fitting since he gets so little while doing so much harm. If truth prevails, this should read as his epitaph.
Damocles Junior says
Thank you Wellington for those interesting thoughts.
Yet this man will continue to receive a rock-star reception wherever he goes, are we so blind that we can not see through him or does he truly represent the spirit of our age?
Where will he be going and what will be his future plans after Jan 20th 2017. (OK, If he was in Africa or the Middle East he would have declared himself President for Life).My guess is that he will be supporting the Michelle for 2020 campaign. Perhaps he may also get a top job at the world bank or the UN. I don’t think he will be going away anytime soon. His influence will be scary.
As for a new “Race” I have 2 comments. 1, I thought Obama told Americans that he was moving towards a Post Racial Society, and. 2, Race is only a social concept. Even if he does somehow get a legal category for persons from the ME and North Africa these people are so completely divided by everything from their skin colour, national and political differences as well as every shade of their evil religion.
The only race that I know which has been “created” in recent history were the South African Cape Coloureds. Basically the descendants of many mixed race marriages in the 17th century between adventurers, seamen & colonists etc. They kept their own identity and married within their own. (Obama would be in this race grouping under Apartheid rules)
I understand that the US Presidential Election is only a month away, one way or another I feel it is going to be a historical watershed.
PS, Google the following in turn; Antichrist for Islam, Obama & Putin! I don’t take it too seriously but Obama is right up the top with the rest of them for results.
Georg says
What a disaster. And it’ll be one of a million PC things that gets in without being put to Congress.
El Cid says
This has been the plan all along.
It will not include Sikhs or Christians.
It’s an attempt to make “Islamophobia” a racist act. It’s to force Americans to engage in affirmative action to ensure that the labour force is representative of Muslims.
SAKOVKT says
Will Esperanto be the official MENA language?
“Inclusion” in the Democratic National Party is a given, with honorary citizenship only on election years,
because there is no doubt, that White Men have oppressed and abused this new race, even before it
existed, and that only the DNC can change any of that.
That’s how smart we are!
Angemon says
Esperanto? Probably Arabic. You know, because Arabia is sooooooooooo related to North Africa…
abad says
How absurd, from Absurd Hussein Absurdama himself.
Jan Aage Jeppesen says
Good joke.
The last politician who invented a new race was the German head of state from 1933-45.
He invented the Semitic race, declared himself an antisemite, and based his racial policy on “antisemitism”. The word derived from a group of cognate “Semitic” (i.e. stemming from the biblical Shem, one of Noah`s three son) languages – Hebrew, Aramaic, Arabic, Babylonian, Assyrian, and Ethiopic – and applied, inappropriately, to a pseudoscientific racial designation by German journalist Wilhelm Marr in the 1870s. Regardless, for the past century as Robert Winstrich notes:
“the illogical term “antisemitism” … which never really meant hatred of “Semites” (for example Arabs) at all, but rather hatred of Jews, has come to be accepted in general usage as denoting all forms of hostility towards Jews and Judaism throughout history.”
But perhaps the strongest evidence that antisemitism was never meant to be directed at Arabs (or Muslims, or any non-Jews) comes from the perpetrators of genocidal antisemitic violence, the Nazis. During a November 1942 press conference, a Berlin foreign ministry spokesman, as reported in the New York Times, took “great pains” to assure Arabs that Nazi antisemitic policies were directed at Jews, exclusively. The spokesman elaborated:
“The difference between Germany`s attitude toward Jews and Arabs has been clearly shown in the exchange of letters between the former Prime Minister of Iraq, Rashid Ali, and the German Institute for Racial Problems. We have never said the Arabs were inferior as a race. On the contrary, we have always pointed out the glorious historic past of the Arab people.
While in Berlin, Rashid Ali (the Pro-Nazi Iraqi Premier deposed in May/June 1941) was apparently disquieted by the language and, more especially, the terminology of antisemitism. His concerns were authoritatively removed in an exchange of letters with an official spokesman of the German Nazi Party. In answer to a question from Rashid Ali as to whether antisemitism was also directed against Arabs, because they were part of the Semitic family.
Professor Walter Gross, director of the Race Policy Office of the Nazi Party, explained with great emphasis, in a letter dated October 17, 1942, that this was not the case and that antisemitism was concerned wholly and exclusively with Jews. On the contrary, he observed, the Nazis had always shown sympathy and support for the Arab course against the Jews. In the course of his letter, he even remarked that the expression “antisemitism, which has been used for decades by the anti-Jewish movement, was incorrect since his movement was directed exclusively against Jewry, and not against other people who speak a Semitic language.”
So inventors of new races should be really careful or they will run into problems. 😉
utis says
Does anyone in government think things through any more? When your DNA tells you you’re part native American, part African, part Vietnamese and part Anglo-Irish, how are you gonna fill out the census? Is there going to be a Bureau of Ethnicity to figure out what you are? I recall the Nazis had “experts” to figure out if you were Aryan or concentration camp fodder. Is that Our Dear Leader wants for us?
Or maybe the White House will let us pick our own designation, so we can be what we feel like on any day or hour. Can I just fill out “Martian” on my 2020 census, or are we still going to be planet-centered?
Mr. Farton says
Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, is a collection of fantasies, wishful thinking, terrible ideas based on fear, prejudice, and ignorance, and that’s about it.
gravenimage says
More witless false moral equivalence. Whatever one thinks of Judaism and Christianity, they are not waging mass terrorist attacks on unbelievers as Islam is.
sinantara says
Mr. Farton
If you want to make a comparative study of Islam and Christianity come to Indonesia, a so called moderate Islamic country. Then do a test, if you’re disturbed by church bells, go to the church and make a complaint. Say that you’re a Muslim, see the people you’re complaining to become pale and break out in cold sweat. Then do the same when the azan ifrom the local mosque s too loud, say that you’re a Christian. Keep your car outside with the key in the contact.
At 30 July 2016 a Chinese Buddhist woman from Tanjung Balai, north Sumatra named Meliana protested the azan call to prayer waking everybody up at 4.30 in the morning as being too loud. Probably because she was an Islamophobe. So a mob of people who of course had nothing to do with Islam felt offended that Meliana didn’t respect multiculturalism and diversity burned down her home and then the Buddhist viharas in town. Of course burning down Buddhist places of worship may be seen as against mc and diversity, but if a Buddhist is so intolerant as to insult other religions, well, the intolerant should not be tolerated…
Meliana then was taken into custody for inciting riots by insulting a certain religion and was told to publicly ask for forgiveness. Which she did. Still the representatives of a certain group of people who had hijacked peaceful Islam wanted her to be tried for what they called intolerance and arrogance. Yes, that was the formal complaint. No arrests where made of those who carried out destruction, they would result in bigger riots, One should not arrest people who are just defending their religion against arrogance and intolerance.
A year ago in Temanggung, Central Java, some a Christian suggested, maybe talking about architecture, or semiotics, or Freud, the Kaabah is phallic in nature and the hajar aswad is vaginal. Coming from a Javanese this was probably not meant to insult, no Javanese Hindu would be insulted if the Sukuh Temple would be called phallic and the Ceto Temple vaginal. They are, since linggal and yoni are sacred symbols signifying procreation which is giving and receiving life. But coming from a Christian, it was received as an insult. It was not clear what the context was or who was involved in the conversation. The rumor that “a Christian has insulted Islam” was sufficient, for a rampage, and the burning down of churches. But maybe the Christians of Temanggung deserved it. A should have said to B, lets go to a place where nobody can overhear us, or when using the internet, lets agree upon a code…Like The Religion of Peace for Islam.
But I have to equalize, yes… So Mr Farton, I can show you an example of Islamophobic Christians. Come to Indonesia at Christmass, and we go to night mass. You will note that the church is cordoned off by police and soldiers, that before mass, the bomb squad goes in with sniffer dogs to search for explosives, you will not that cars are not allowed to park in front..You’ll maybe ask, what’s up? Somebody will maybe will tell you.let’s go to a place where nobody can overhear us. Then to whisper in you’re ear, “Where Islamophobes! We have an unreasonable fear that a Muslim will bomb us…”
Maybe you’ll not believe it. But if you’re lucky, you’ll experience what the churchgoers in Sukoharjo, Central Java experienced. SInce it was not Christmass people thought they were safe. But one person whose religion and motives were not clear exploded his bomb vest in the middle of the crowd when leaving church. The bomb was coated with ball bearings… I say not clear because he himself was blown to pieces (with a number of others). So we can never know… But when that happened I really made the mistake of guessing it was a Muslim, committing the sin of Islamophobia.
I have followed JW for a while but sometimes I feel ill because all of this intellectual talk and I ask, who of you contributors now what it is to live the life of a dhimmi. It is easy to talk about texts and say yes, look at what the Jews did to the people of Ai! But reading about what the Jews did to the people of Ai 4000 years ago is not the same as touching the ash of the church were you was married, knowing that whoever set fire to it will never be apprehended. Knowing that if I would make a case of it I will be the one arrested for inciting a riot.
ate
And I have once looked a man in the eye who threatened to slit my throat because something I wrote and what I saw there was…Islam, pure hatred for the infidel who dared to forget his dhimmi ship. But I said, just try… It was just that he was not with a mob and he knew that I was a karate instructor and competitor. Such moments make a total loss of objectivity… At such times you just don;t think oh, the poor man, he has to have a grievance and my religion is hateful too because it describes warfare of 4000 years ago. You only think, I know who my enemy is, which are not the Jews and not the Jezuits–but these people here and now…
Wellington says
Seconding gravenimage, you really are witless. Even assuming the three religions you named are only fantasies, two of them aren’t producing people who want to kill you if you criticize or mock their fantasy of choice. But one here is—–in huge numbers. Huge difference.
Really, you ought to try growing up, both intellectually and emotionally. You could start by ridding yourself of your adolescent name. But you won’t. Nope, you’re going to just keep posting puerile, vapid stuff with a name that says more about you than you realize. Good in a way since you deserve what you have reaped.
Champ says
Mr. Farton wrote:
“Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, is a collection of fantasies, wishful thinking, terrible ideas based on fear, prejudice, and ignorance, and that’s about it.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“that’s about it”?
No, Mr. Farton, there’s much more to it than that, and you’ve come to the right place for a much needed education on the subject you’ve raised …
Robert Spencer has written an excellent book entitled:
“Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t”
Christianity or Islam: which is the real “religion of peace”?
Almost any liberal pundit will tell you that there’s a religion bent on destroying our Constitution, stripping us of our liberties, and imposing religious rule on the U.S. And that religion is . . .Christianity! About Islam, however, the Left is silent–except to claim a moral equivalence between the two: if Islam has terrorists today, that’s nothing compared to the Crusades, inquisitions, and religious wars in Christianity’s past.
But is this true? Are conservative Christians really more of a threat to free societies than Islamic jihadists? Is the Bible really “just as violent” as the Qur’an? Is Christianity’s history really as bloodstained as Islam’s? In Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t, New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer not only refutes such charges, but also explains why Americans and Europeans must regain an appreciation of our Christian heritage if we ever hope to defeat Islamic supremacism. In this eye opening work, Spencer reveals:
* The fundamental differences between Islamic and Christian teachings about warfare against other religions: “Love your enemies” vs. “Be ruthless to the unbelievers”
* The myth of Western immorality and Islamic puritanism and why the Islamic world is less moral than the West
* Why the Islamic world has never developed the distinction between religious and secular law that is inherent in Christianity
* Why Christianity has always embraced reason–and Islam has always rejected it
* Why the most determined enemies of Western civilization may not be the jihadists at all, but the leftists who fear their churchgoing neighbors more than Islamic terrorists
* Why Jews, Christians, and peoples of other faiths (or no faith) are equally at risk from militant Islam
Spencer writes not to proselytize, but to state a fact: Christianity is a true “religion of peace,” and on it Western civilization stands. If we are not to perish under Islam’s religion of the sword–with its more than 100 million active jihadists seeking to impose sharia law–we had better defend our own civilization.
https://www.amazon.com/Religion-Peace-Christianity-Islam-Isnt/dp/1596985151
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A must read!
More Ham Ed says
Hard to believe O’ balmy hasn’t changed the name of the WHITE house yet.
Damocles Junior says
A rather old joke but I am sure that will be on the “Michelle 2020” agenda together with the architect designed minarets.
nosa says
The people of the Middle East (being one myself) are not a single race. We have a varied mix of other races on top of the original Mediterranean stock. It is nonsense to call a person from the area a Middle Eastern on a blanket basis.
This is an attempt by Muslims to make themselves different and therefore deserving of special treatment as a racial minority. Imagine making a new race called the American Race expecting an American to have a special ‘look’. This is utter NONSENSE.
particolor says
He’s determined that P O S isn’t he !!!
Crusades Were Right! says
I’m from Ireland. wonder what MY “race” is?
North West Europe/East Atlantic?
Perhaps President Obama will let me know some day.
JayT says
Crusades Were Right! You’d better hope he doesn’t consider you a leprachaun else Obama will want to redistribute every last gold coin in your pot and “spread the wealth around” as he once told Joe the plumber.
scherado says
It is now time to banish racial categories in the American census. Yeah, I know, Martians made canals.
Robert Siena says
The Census … Currently Arabs are categorized as White.. Maybe Mena will be useful. Look it up.
particolor says
What ?? There must be something wrong with my Coffee ?? I tossed it out after reading that !!
JoeThePimpernel says
Racists gotta do what racists gotta do.
Carolyne says
Obama thinks he is God–or rather , “Allah.” He is nothing but a skinny little black man who somehow wormed his way into the Presidency by claiming he was born in Hawaii. He is a Muslim bent on the destruction of the US and gathering it into the Caliphate which is his duty as a Muslim. He cannot create a new race just as he cannot successfully lead a free country. He can create nothing but division and misery.
JayT says
Obama thinks he is God–or rather , “Allah.” He is nothing but a skinny little black man who somehow wormed his way into the Presidency by claiming he was born in Hawaii. He is a Muslim bent on the destruction of the US and gathering it into the Caliphate which is his duty as a Muslim. He cannot create a new race just as he cannot successfully lead a free country. He can create nothing but division and misery.
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
Carolyne, aside from Obama’s long form birth certificate displayed for public viewing, there is yet a more compelling piece of evidence that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii. Bill O’Reilly, during the height of the controversy brought out a Hawaiian newspaper from that year in 1961 and showed everyone the section where they announce new births. Yes, Obama’s was listed there so one cannot fabricate time unless able to travel back through time to the past knowing the new born would one day run for POTUS.
I’ll agree with you on the physically weak appearance as it was embarrassing to watch him on a cameo during the election cycle working out with massive 5 lb. dumbbells.
Obama likes to liken himself by not refuting it, but he’s not black, he is bi-racial. Unlike Tiger Woods, who routinely chastised reporters that called or referred to him as a black athlete because he felt it demeaned his mother, Obama likes to be associated as black as it gives him advantages he otherwise wouldn’t have. Jesse Jackson was once caught on a live mike screw up saying he couldn’t stand Obama and that he wasn’t a black man. Of course, once Obama won JJ changed his tune and even had managed theatrical tears for the camera moment.
Well, Obama has almost run out of time with just a few months left on working hard to put all Americans on their hands and knees facing Mecca, but the real danger will be if Hillary wins. She, bought and paid for by the Middle East, will undoubtedly accelerate his work and further erode the U.S. over her term.
Guest says
I don’t care if it means federal prison I’m going to go slap him now.
particolor says
He might Turn The Other Cheek ?? 🙂 🙂
Robert McKenna says
If you please, the lump in my cheek is my tongue.
Y’know, Obama, the Serial Liar In The White House, may be right. All muslims may be one race. For instance, I have noticed the traits of Somalis and North Africans in Nihad Awadasnot and his mouthpiece, Curly Ibrahim.
You can hardly tell the difference. Maybe there is something their Mommies haven’t told them.
Just saying.
rabrooks says
We already dismissed what the last “bright idea” from the britts did to iraq.
So lets see. How far south, does north extend?
How far west, does east extend?
How far east does east extend?
Will Israel/Israelis be part of this new “race”? Would they be the same as Iranians?
Isn’t Africa a continent, containing many countries, tribes, religions?
Hell, they can’t understand the current divisions.
Will the rest of us be forced to conform to the “new” racial divisions?
If I can choose my gender identity, why can’t I change my nationality?
How much will it cost just for the new forms.
Paul Clark says
I agree that there should be a new classification of race. I suggest the race of Fools. Moses pointed them out long ago. Muhammad has perfected it. Yes, Bama let us change their names to Fools They are now called Muslims, but that lacks accuracy. Since this has been a recent suggestion by Bama, I suggest also there is sufficient evidence to indicate that Bama is one of originators of Fools. His DNA , family history, socialist, racist, and Islamic political history proves, without a doubt, he derives from a long line of Fools.
particolor says
These Buffoons don’t win Election’s on their own Merits !!
particolor says
Take Hillary for Example, O DEAR !!!
Kadok says
We know Obama thinks he is a king, and now he is taking on the characteristics of SOROS who thinks he is GOD Like, Obama thinks he can declare a new race of people, WHY? Because Obama says so?, both of these people are delusional. The same people think they can circumvent GOD, they think they will be able to turn the tide during the last days and completely take over the world, the same people who start all the wars between the nations have their dreams of grandeur, a one world government and all nations living in peace, and yet they cannot live in peace amongst themselves simply because they will inevitably start another war between themselves, Obama and Clinton and most other politicians will continue to try and tear Trump down, simply because they are afraid, and they have every right to be afraid, when some one gets into the office of the POTUS and starts actually looking at all the deceitful executive orders Obama has signed and Clinton has signed and Bush has signed, someone just might wind up in a small cell for a very long time.
particolor says
Trump was right !! Jail Her !!