The reality beneath Trudeau’s adulation of diversity is like a festering sore; his misplaced praise diverts attention away from the grave threat of jihadi infiltration and its threat to homeland security, and undermines the real heroes who stopped the jihadists on that fateful day at the Canadian Parliament.
Most worrisome is that prior to carrying out their attacks both perpetrators were known to Canadian law enforcement authorities. In fact, Rouleau was included in the list of 90 Canadian nationals considered at ‘high risk’ for possible involvement in terrorist activities; yet at the time not considered sufficiently serious to warrant tighter surveillance of his activities, surveillance that might have prevented his attack.
The anniversary of the jihadist attack on Canadian Parliament is no occasion to applaud diversity. The West has allowed an indiscriminate form of “diversity,” Islamic supremacism, to undermine democracy and terrorize Western citizens.
The heroic act of Canadian Parliament’s head of security, sergeant-at-arms Kevin Vickers, saved the day. Vickers risked his life to take down Michael Zehaf-Bibeau in a “dramatic hail of gunfire,” right after Zehaf-Bibeau — an Islamic convert who had joined the Islamic State — shot dead a Canadian soldier. Vickers even “changed my impression of Canada,” according to Josh Marshall, editor and publisher of the far-Left political website Talking Points Memo, which “decreed” Vickers “Lord High Badass of Canada.”
The humble Canadian hero received global, deserved accolades; one was in the Israeli Parliament, where he stated: “This is not about me. This is about the team of Commons security services.” He went on:
Safety is community based.
This is not an issue just for security, this is everybody’s issue and how we deal with this is by everybody, all the citizens, working together with their local police, their national police to ensure we have a safe society.
Vickers’ message of everyone working together to ensure the safety of society is important; sincere democracy-supporting Muslims should be at the forefront of facilitating such efforts, not shouting “Islamophobia.”
Israel is a most suitable place for Vickers to have been honored, as it was under jihadist attack long before the modern jihadist incursion into the West. We also know that Israel is a very diverse country, from which Trudeau can take lessons as Prime Minister of a multicultural state; beginning with the facts that Raffa Abu Tareef, a Druze writer, researcher and 25-year veteran of the Israel Defense Forces, points out:
Islamism is a movement that regards the sovereign Jewish state as an existential battle between Islam and Judaism…..
the movement has fostered the “Islamization” of the geography and history of the Land of Israel. In an attempt to provide a framework for dealing with what it sees as the occupation of Palestine by the Jews, Islamists have rewritten the history of the Land of Israel.
Islamic supremacism – through lies about victimhood and “Islamophobia” — has made deep inroads into Europe under the cover of “diversity,” and is well on its way in North America to doing the same, a territory that is perceived by Islamic supremacists as “dar al Harb” (House of War) that must be subjugated under “dar al Islam” (House of Islam). It is a similar premise to the “Islamization” of geography that Tareef describes, in which Western countries are deemed “colonialist victimizers,” a term that corresponds to “the Zionist entity”; but jihadists conceal their own history of bloody conquest, modern day abuses and ongoing slavery of blacks by Muslim Arabs. There is no respect for “diversity” or pluralism in the vocabulary of the Islamic supremacists who have infiltrated us.
As Trudeau denies this reality, he continues to smile and indiscriminately worship “diversity,” even on an inappropriate occasion.
“Trudeau says reaction to Ottawa attack shows that diversity ‘makes our country strong’”, by Jonathan Halevi, CiJ News, October 22, 2016:
Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, issued on Saturday, October 22, 2016, a statement on the two-year anniversary of the attack at the Cenotaph and Parliament Hill with no word on the perpetrator’s motive and ideological affiliation. Trudeau described the attack as “brutal”, “vicious” and “deadly” emphasizing that “Canada will not be intimidated by hatred and violence.”
He further said that the reaction to the attack demonstrated yet again that “diversity and collective love of democracy are what make our country strong and our nation great.”
The following is Trudeau’s statement:
“Two years ago, Canadians were shocked by the brutal attack that took place in and around Parliament that claimed the life of Corporal Nathan Cirillo and injured others.
“This vicious attack, at the very heart of our democracy, sought to frighten and divide Canadians. Instead it had the exact opposite effect, drawing us closer together and making us stronger. In the wake of this deadly assault, parliamentarians and Canadians united in condemning terrorism and further embracing our diversity.
“The whole country honoured first responders – Senate and House of Commons Protective Services, the RCMP, former House of Commons Sergeant-at-Arms Kevin Vickers, medical personnel and others – for their bravery and their willingness to put themselves in harm’s way for Canadians of all backgrounds and faiths.
“It showed the world that Canada will not be intimidated by hatred and violence, but will meet these acts with strength and conviction. This also showed me yet again that our diversity and collective love of democracy are what make our country strong and our nation great.
“I join all Canadians today in mourning the loss of Corporal Cirillo and Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent – who was killed two days earlier in an attack in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec.
“These two members of the Canadian Armed Forces made the ultimate sacrifice for the country they loved. The most fitting tribute that we can pay them is defending the values that they so personified.”
On October 20, 2014 , Martin Ahmad Couture-Rouleau, a convert to Islam, deliberately drove into two Canadian Forces soldiers in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, near Montreal, killing Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent before he was shot dead after a police chase. Faisal, his Facebook friend, told CBC that Couture-Rouleau was a supporter of the Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, IS, Deash, Caliphate). He posted on a Facebook page that was allegedly affiliated with him the black flags of the Islamic State. Months before the attack, the Police was aware of Couture-Rouleau’s radical statements on social media and arrested him in July 2014 foiling his plan to board a plane to Turkey, probably in his way to Syria. To watch CBC report on Martin Ahmad Couture-Rouleau click HERE.
On October 22, 2014, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, 32, Canadian born and a convert to Islam, shot dead a soldier and was killed after opening fire inside the Parliament in Ottawa. Zehaf-Bibeau saw himself as a “mujahid”, meaning a fighter in the path of Allah, and said that “Canada’s officially become one of our [Muslim mujahideen] enemies.”
A Short time before he went to the attack at Parliament Hill, Zehaf-Bibeau recorded his last message to the world in which he told his motives:
“In the name of Allah, the most gracious and the most merciful. All praises to Allah, the lord of the universe. We seek his help and ask for his forgiveness. Lord, open for me my chest, ease my task for me and remove the impediment from my speech. In the name of Allah the most gracious and the most merciful.
“To those who are involved and listen to this movie, this is in retaliation for Afghanistan and because Harper wants to send his troops to Iraq.
“So we are retaliating, the Mujahedin of this world. Canada’s officially become one of our enemies by fighting and bombing us and creating a lot of terror in our countries and killing us and killing our innocents. So, just aiming to hit some soldiers just to show that you’re not even safe in your own land, and you gotta be careful.
“So, may Allah accept from us. It’s a disgrace you guys have forgotten God and have you let every indecency and things running your land. We don’t, we don’t go for this. We are good people, righteous people, believers of God and believing his law and his Prophets, peace be upon them all….

davej says
The concept is that diversity encourages tolerance, which is true in principle. Since we are already diverse we would be wise to peacefully tolerate each other, plus we get exotic cuisines in the bargain.
The fatal flaw in this idea is that you cannot tolerate the intolerant and it would be very unwise and possibly dangerous to do so. If there is one group that believes it has the right to rule over you, rape you and kill you that is not “diversity” and your tolerance is simply madness.
It seems that most people cannot bring themselves to recognize the truth about Islam and instead would prefer to live in the la-la world of the Left. This is a failure of imagination brought on by a lack of critical thinking and a surplus of wishful thinking.
billybob says
If “Diversity makes our country strong”, let us release all the rapists, criminals, and murders from our jails so that they mingle with the population and give us their diversity. In sociology 101 terms, these people we have been locking up are our “social deviants”. If we lock up our deviants, we end up a monoculture. Deviants bring a different, often unique perspective to the table. Perhaps it’s worth the risks? [sarc off]
mortimer says
DISUNITY IS STRENGTH! WAR IS PEACE! 1984 IS NOW! FREE SPEECH IS FINISHED!
Carolyne says
I don’t see where our leaders got the idea that diversity creates strength. Every example I have seen is to the contrary. When Major Hassan murdered all of those people in Texas, some officer said that what would be worse would be that we not have diversity in our armed services. Tell that to the survivors of the murdered people in Texas and all over the world where the treacherous Muslim has murdered innocent people.
I like to see some examples of that strength. I don’t believe there are any because it is a lie.
carol says
Trudeau’s proving to be an embarrassment and I wish he’d stop smiling at himself in the mirror. You don’t create reality – you try to work with it. I have no doubt that Islamic “peccadillos” and MB infiltrations will continue to be low-key here for a loooong time as Canadians are SO naive as to remain silent while congratulating themselves on being PC.
In a recent Digest article I posted a link to a post re a Danish researcher (can’t find it now) and his conclusions/speculations re Muslim inbreeding. I used it to support my opinion that we shouldn’t waste too much time studying Islamic texts but instead study terrorists themselves. Following this line of reasoning in an article entitled “Muslim migrant beats, rapes US woman while chanting Allahuh Akbar” I quickly noticed a statement his sister made (sometimes little things like this can give a lot of insight). The relevant section is 1:52 to 2:22:
Bradthefuzz says
When a nation elects a mealy-mouthed Islamic-sympathising coward to lead their beloved country, they get what they voted for.
gravenimage says
Good post, Dave.
Don McKellar says
What a piece of garbage Turdeau is.
BLC says
He is a fool, a dhimmi to Muslims and an embarrassment to the Canadian people.
billybob says
He jumps onto the PC leftist, progressive vision. That takes no special imagination or intelligence. He demonstrates his impoverished perspective and intellect. If you want to see what a real intellect is like combined with an imaginative, contemplated and unique perspective, I invite you to listen to the Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán.
Hungarian President Viktor Orban: Islam is constitutionally illegal
https://youtu.be/gE7oCXPb2Iw
billybob says
While that video link I posted above is interesting in an intellectual way, in the end it is a long argument to prove a single point, that according to the Hungarian constitution Islam is constitutionally illegal. There are many other fascinating YouTube videos of Viktor Orban’s parliamentary speeches, and I suggest you just search YouTube with his name. This one below I just watched is chock full of reasons to restrict immigration in Europe, both based on future demographic concerns and practical security concerns in the present. It reveals the inner workings and the deviousness of the progressive left in Europe. How I wish my own Prime Minister Trudeau had even just a fraction of the intellect and courage of this man Viktor Orban…
https://youtu.be/lwrvvvK0uUY
Vlad says
Who the fuck voted the “shiny pony” into office????
How many idiots are living in Canada???? Or was it “Voter Fraud”?
Carolyne says
Canada is a smaller country population wise than the US so I’d say likely the same percentage of idiots who voted Obama the Muslim in.
Rob Porter says
Carolyne, very well said. And the same applies to the American idiots who will vote for the disgusting Hillary Clinton.
Gordon Perry says
The Mainstream Mockingbird Misinformation Machine. They painted a beautiful picture, smeared Mr Harper and got him elected, on 29% of the popular vote.
Taurus Caerulus says
Why the Islam is abled to turn the whole world topsy turvy?
Why the whole whole world beliefs it satanic lies?
Why will the Islam be endorsed, by those had to be killed in their eyes?
katherine says
Because most of the world’s processed food is Sharia Compliant including bottled water and blasphemy-sensitive wells. They have all been blessed by the Devil – no kidding, look for the compliance Mark.
Next : the furniture, the public transport, the swimming pools, close friends, all need strict Porcine DNA-presence testing which I understand is the most advanced technical Islamic concept introduced by a certain Prime Minister in SE Asia. The scientific term is a statistical mean called ‘ Islamization Index ‘.
Jaladhi says
Does this kid even know how to spell “strong”! The brain washed lefty liberal is nothing but weak and coward. He is so blind to his diversity illusion that he even can’t see how the country is being changed by the influx of Muslim immigrants/refugees! And he should sermonize about diversity!!
Peter Hyatt says
perhaps Canadians first female prime minister hasn’t
worked out as hoped?
gravenimage says
Peter Hyatt wrote:
perhaps Canadians first female prime minister hasn’t
worked out as hoped?
………………………..
Peter, surely you are aware that Canada *has* had a female prime minister? That would be the rather uninspiring Kim Campbell, back in 1993.
I suppose what you said was intended as a short hand for Justin Trudeau being a pussy?
The thing is, though, that we have also seen prime ministers like Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher–*hardly* pussies. In fact, I wish Canada–and most of the West–had leaders of this caliber of *either* gender.
Mubarak says
The business of the regressive left is to prepare the way for Islam. It is Crypto-Islam with a political face complimenting Islam as politics with a religious face. The left is in effect proclaiming Islam saying: “He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.”
gravenimage says
Actually–as Mubarak well knows–the left is mostly in denial as to the threat of Islam. They want to think that it is just more cheery “multiculturalism”.
Mubarak says
Sometimes people don’t know what they are “in effect” doing being mindless puppets in the service of evil. –
But thanks for cutting out the invectives!
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
Sometimes people don’t know what they are “in effect” doing being mindless puppets in the service of evil.
…………………………
Mubarak, however, is *not* unknowing in his condoning of Muslims raping us:
Mubarak says
February 16, 2016 at 4:27 am
I know it is not political correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.
Is this offense of public nudity informed by a morality that is loftier than the one that is protested against —? And the West is filled with vulgar, public commercials…
And shouldn’t women in the West be happy anyway, that they can attract the attention of newcomers, and that these take trouble to bother them?
I hope these questions offend you because it must needs be that offense come in order for us all to fall on our collective nose. Or even better: that the stumbling block falls on us, that we and our petty moral categories can be smashed and shattered into pieces. Tertium non datur.
So thank God for Muslims who migrate or immigrate to the west…
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853
He has also condoned the Muslim rape *of small children*.
More:
But thanks for cutting out the invectives!
…………………………
This is a reference to my characterizing his approval of Muslim rape as “vile” and “repulsive”.
As he would have it, condemning Muslims raping and murdering us is “hate speech”, just as is calling for Muslims to rape and murder us. *Ugh*.
Here’s the reference, over on this thread where he is whitewashing the rape of children:
Mubarak says
October 22, 2016 at 9:27 am
…Isn’t it ironic to find on a site that condemns Islamic hate speech, that so many in the Comment Section exercise it?…
Mubarak says
October 22, 2016 at 1:31 pm
…I myself have repeatedly been called “vile”, “repulsive”, “disgusting” and “creep” in the comment section.
Isn’t that hate speech?
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/austria-muslim-migrant-who-raped-10-year-old-boy-has-conviction-overturned/comment-page-1#comment-1542421
Lots more ugliness from him over on that thread.
Champ says
Graven, I see that you’ve also posted the same egregious comment from “Mubarak” dated February 16, 2016 …not surprising that we both referenced it since it’s *sooo* repulsive!!
gravenimage says
True, Champ–but I could have posted dozens of comments of his that are every bit as appalling as that one.
Champ says
“Mubarak” wrote:
“It is Crypto-Islam with a political face complimenting Islam as politics with a religious face.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hmm, and “Mubarak” wears a “religious face” by *pretending* to be a Christian, so I find his choice of a phrase rather ironic; and when his mask slips, his stealth-jihad agenda becomes crystal clear.
Mubarak says
I have lost my job for protesting against having Muslim prayer imposed on me on my workplace. And I have had discussions in a Muslim country with Muslims who told me, that “if you’d say that to a real Muslim, he would cut your throat.”
Did that ever happen to a champ like you? And do you call that “stealth jihad”?
And to be sure: my Christianity is sadly incomplete, but I am working on it.
Champ says
Anyone familiar with the posting history of “Mubarak”–over the past 10 months, or so–knows that he’s a stealth-jihadist …
First example:
Mubarak says
February 16, 2016 at 4:27 am
I know it is not political correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.
Is this offense of public nudity informed by a morality that is loftier than the one that is protested against —? And the West is filled with vulgar, public commercials and public exposures of women narcissistically prostituting themselves and their bodies to the effect, that males and females now march by the thousands and millions in parades all over the Western World priding themselves that the opposite sex no longer excites them or indeed can excite them. Could it be, that these carnivallers ironically express, that they have become fed up with the constant exposure of cheap, rotten flesh everywhere around them thus advertising, that lust for their own kind and flesh is the only and ultimate “freedom” that can revive them and us and save us all?
And shouldn’t women in the West be happy anyway, that they can attract the attention of newcomers, and that these take trouble to bother them?
I hope these questions offend you because it must needs be that offense come in order for us all to fall on our collective nose. Or even better: that the stumbling block falls on us, that we and our petty moral categories can be smashed and shattered into pieces. Tertium non datur.
So thank God for Muslims who migrate or immigrate to the west. If we can persuade them to absorb what is their and our Judeo-Christian inheritance – blood and public nudity – and exhale what they falsely and deceivingly believe to be theirs, the world could be a beautiful place…
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/prosecutor-overwhelming-majority-of-cologne-new-years-eve-sex-assault-suspects-are-refugees#comment-1379853
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Second example:
Mubarak says
October 19, 2016 at 5:30 pm
Here again an obvious case where it makes sense to blame the victim: Mr. Justice Hayden is a victim of his humanistic ideology to the detriment of his community.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/hugh-fitzgerald-keeping-jihadis-from-jihad/comment-page-1#comment-1541076
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here are only two examples of what I’ve read from the vile stealth-jihadist “Mubarak.”
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
I have lost my job for protesting against having Muslim prayer imposed on me on my workplace.
……………………………..
Notice that Mubarak has not said where he was (supposedly) forced to perform Muslim prayers.
He only came up with this a day or two ago–it does not sound very plausible, and is likely a bid for victimhood.
More:
Did that ever happen to a champ like you? And do you call that “stealth jihad”?
……………………………..
Champ, of course, is not referring to this (alleged) incident, but rather to Mubarak’s incessant call for Muslims to rape us.
More:
And to be sure: my Christianity is sadly incomplete, but I am working on it.
……………………………..
What he likely means is that he is “working on” being able to pass as a Christian here.
Certainly, the idea that Christianity demands that we not allow mixed gender youth wrestling or women to attend public New Year’s Eve celebrations, but instead must import large numbers of Muslims to rape us so we can “atone” for such sins is *anything* but Christian.
gravenimage says
Fine post, Champ.
Champ says
Graven wrote:
“Champ, of course, is not referring to this (alleged) incident, but rather to Mubarak’s incessant call for Muslims to rape us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Precisely, Graven, thank you!
Jay Boo says
I wonder if the pretend to be Christian, named Mubarak has a cousin who is a pretend to be atheist named Ismail. I guess both are on the run from make believe Muslims.
About Islam and Muslims, Mubarak will declare:
Islam — Bad
Muslims — Violent
WOW! did not know that.
We see Mubarak’s comments about non-Muslims however, have much more diversity of thought in the blame game.
Mubarak says
I have never been forced to perform Muslim prayers. I have been forced – like a growing number in the western world – to accept that common rooms in our workplaces are used by Muslims as prayer rooms. For most/many non Muslims it is an unwelcome experience to have Muslims bow down close to you and often turning their butts in your direction while mumbling their prayers. A written complaint to my boss resulted in me loosing my job and called a racist. If that’s so unbelievable to you, it can easily be verified, and if I told you the name of my country it wouldn’t surprise you.
I don’t invent stories to feed my self pity or gain the sympathy of commentators here.
gravenimage says
Why would Mubarak object to Muslim prayers in his workplace, when he has insisted that we deserve Muslim rapists in our streets? Does that mean that he has a problem with Muslim prayer, but not what it is that Muslim prayers call for? Really, this makes little sense.
And if–as he claims–Christianity demands that we accept Muslims in to our societies so that they can rape us so we will atone for our decadent culture, then surely it is a small price to pay to watch Muslims arse-lifting?
After all, he says that we should not be offended by watching Muslims rape women and children in the streets–one would think Muslim prayers would be a minor matter in comparison?
Champ says
Graven wrote:
“Why would Mubarak object to Muslim prayers in his workplace, when he has insisted that we deserve Muslim rapists in our streets? Does that mean that he has a problem with Muslim prayer, but not what it is that Muslim prayers call for? Really, this makes little sense.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hear, hear! Good catch, Graven.
And your entire comment is a great response to “Mubarak” and his nonsense and outright lies.
gravenimage says
Thanks, Champ. 🙂
carol says
On Feb. 16/16 they say Mubarak wrote:
“I know it’s not politically correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.”
Hasn’t Mubarak put the cart before the horse? – since the performance artist made her protest on Feb. 8/16? And he’s obviously convinced males lacking self-control are entitled to set the rules of virtue. In Europe I think they use a phrase called “TESTING YOUR RESOLVE” and so all the insults to female and male victims (who aren’t inclined to jump to barbarities and who perhaps see the big crowds of sturdy, male, fighting-age Muslim “child” refugees awaiting in the background and thus opt for self-preservation) are really designed to make us feel ineffective and hopeless – to become so discouraged that we embrace our aggressors (as their ancestors once undoubtedly did – the irony of it all!)
You tube has videos re a “rape-game” called TAHARRUSH so we’ll see more of this. Perhaps Christian holiday gatherings will provide a new opportunity for “swarming”.
Mubarak doesn’t seem to know or care that men are to control themselves and Western civilization doesn’t philosophically accept that “might is right”. We’ve been busy functioning and cooperating with productive, like-minded nations instead of lolling about in hatred and pity parties.
He also doesn’t get that there’s a silent majority in Western civilization that freely act with a great deal of morality and certainly don’t need lessons from the samples Islam has created.
carol says
Shades of Lara Logan! Here’s a video Mubarak might to explicate:
gravenimage says
Carol wrote:
On Feb. 16/16 they say Mubarak wrote:
“I know it’s not politically correct, but I’d like to explicate the sex assaults by refugees in Cologne by blaming the victims, because if you believe, that in order to protest against rape and sexual harassment the freedom of the West should entail standing totally naked in a public square under cover of being a “performance artist”, there is something rotten in the state of your mind, and this freedom of yours ought rightfully to be turned against you in order to harass you.”
Hasn’t Mubarak put the cart before the horse? – since the performance artist made her protest on Feb. 8/16?
…………………………….
Exactly, Carol–at the time, I pointed out that Muslims could not have raped these women because of the nude protest, since the nude protester was protesting the New Year’s Eve rapes. This makes no sense.
But then, when have Muslims ever thought logically?
It is a grotesque claim, in any case–as though anyone had the right to rape someone because they didn’t like the work of a performance artist. As if *anyone* ever had the right to rape someone.
More:
You tube has videos re a “rape-game” called TAHARRUSH so we’ll see more of this. Perhaps Christian holiday gatherings will provide a new opportunity for “swarming”.
…………………………….
Yes–this is rife in the Muslim world, and there certainly are no nude protesters in Cairo.
More:
Mubarak doesn’t seem to know or care that men are to control themselves and Western civilization doesn’t philosophically accept that “might is right”. We’ve been busy functioning and cooperating with productive, like-minded nations instead of lolling about in hatred and pity parties.
He also doesn’t get that there’s a silent majority in Western civilization that freely act with a great deal of morality and certainly don’t need lessons from the samples Islam has created.
…………………………….
He doesn’t care–he has been told that there is *no* right to rape someone, *ever*.
But he believes, like all Muslims, that Muslims have every right to rape their victims.
Champ says
Great observations regarding, “Mubarak”, Carol and Graven!
Mubarak says
To put it shortly:
The West deserves what it gets. A culture that “pisses” Christ will have its own “piss” sprinkled upon its head AND ISLAM WILL BE IT!
Is Christianity then letting Islam doing its dirty work, you may ask? Not at all! But where Christ is not or worse: told to “piss off”, Barabbas will take his place by default.
gravenimage says
The vicious Mubarak wrote:
To put it shortly:
The West deserves what it gets. A culture that “pisses” Christ will have its own “piss” sprinkled upon its head AND ISLAM WILL BE IT!
Is Christianity then letting Islam doing its dirty work, you may ask? Not at all! But where Christ is not or worse: told to “piss off”, Barabbas will take his place by default.
……………………………………
Where to start? Firstly, as I have noted so may times, Muslims are not raping and murdering us in the West because we are ‘decadent’–Islam behaves like this *everywhere*.
Muslims raped and murdered Infidels long before the modern West existed, and Muslims rape and murder Infidels all over the world–not just in the West.
Mubarak and other Muslim apologists may claim that Muslims are targeting the West because–as he would have it–we allow mixed gender youth wrestling or women to go out to public New Year’s Eve celebrations, but this is quite false.
It is, of course, also false that Christianity bans either of these things–Christianity does *not* ban the innocent mixing of the genders, nor does it impose Purdah on women–that is something only *Islam* does.
Then, Mubarak pretends that he has not said that Christianity demands that we let in huge numbers of ravening Muslims to rape us so that we can ‘atone’ for our supposed sins; but this is *exactly* what he has said Christianity demands. The idea that innocent women and children must suffer rape and murder under Christianity is just grotesque calumny.
As for his references to “piss” and “Christ”, this is no doubt a reference to Andres Serrano’s 1987 “artwork” Piss Christ.
The fact is that many Christians and others at the time did quite publicly object to this piece. Two US Senators criticized the piece being publicly funded. High profile Christian clerics objected. There were dozens of newspaper and magazine editorials criticizing the ‘artist’, and there were demonstrations where the piece was displayed.
Mubarak may not understand that this is what civilized people do–they make it known if something offends them. They may urge a boycott of venues that show the piece.
But, with the exception of the issue of public funding, *that’s it*–and that’s all there should be in a civilized society.
Those who objected to the piece did not burn down the Stux Gallery in New York or the National Gallery of Victoria in Australia. They did not murder the patrons who had gone to see the work. They did not put out a Fatwa on Serrano himself.
That is what *Muslims* do if you dare criticize their violent creed–this is *not* something Christians do, nor would it be Christian if they did.
Mubarak’s mask keeps slipping.
Moreover, look what he is suggesting: that because Christians did not murder over a photograph of a small plastic crucifix in urine created almost thirty years ago that the whole of the West deserves to suffer invasion and conquest at the hands of rapist Muslims–that we deserve to see women and little boys mass-raped by these thugs.
By the way, this is the first time he has mentioned this art piece at all.
Previously, he has said that deserve to be raped–in addition to the points I cited, above, of youth wrestling matches and women going out in public to see in the New Year–because there were protests against Muslim rape that featured a nude protester in one case, and young men in mini skirts in another. Another person might consider these types of protest silly; the foul Mubarak considers it another excuse for Muslim rape.
Mubarak has also claimed that women working outside the home–competing with men, as he characterized it–is also grounds for Muslim raping us.
Again, this is a demand that we adopt Shari’ah strictures ourselves, lest Muslims justifiably rape us. *Ugh*. An ugly glimpse into the Muslim mindset, and it is *not* pretty.
Angemon says
“Diversity”. Because it’s “the current year”.
Damocles Junior says
“Trudeau says reaction to Ottawa attack shows that diversity ‘makes our country strong’”
This is the sort of twisted logic that would normally be expressed by Muslims.(or the totally twisted loopy left)
The real people that made Canada strong were the brave and enterprising pioneers, mainly from England, Scotland, Ireland and France who founded and built the nation. These newcomers are just parasites.
Peter the Hermit says
What a naive fool Trudeau is! He and others starry-eyed about Diversity ought to read the chapter titled THE CULT of DIVERSITY in Pat Buchanan’s amazing book, Suicide of a Superpower. It should, at the very least, give them pause regarding their devotion to this Leftist rubbish.
gravenimage says
Trudeau on anniversary of Ottawa jihad attack: “Diversity makes our country strong”
…………………
Actually, it is brave men like Sergeant-at-Arms Kevin Vickers who make Canada strong–not Muslim thugs like this Jihadist.
carol says
This looks like a pretty relevant video from 4/13/16:
“Muslim tells CANADIAN Senate about the danger of the islamic doctrine, and the left PC madness”.
It’s pretty long (46:29) but the speaker isTarek Fatah (a well respected Islamic scholar):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5wTNqOQL-8
Maybe there’s hope, eh?
billybob says
“In the wake of this deadly assault, parliamentarians and Canadians united in condemning terrorism and further embracing our diversity.”
What a stupid, meaningless thing to say! Why in the world would we “further embrace our diversity” at such a moment, even if that was a good thing to do? It is like implying that the first thing that comes to our minds at such a moment is to say “how wonderful our diversity is”. Like – there is a total disconnect here. Imagine you walk up to me and deliver the news… “There has just been a terrorist attack on Parliament”. If I respond “Let us celebrate and embrace our diversity then”, you would walk away shaking your head – if you are kind. Maybe more likely you maky make a remark about cuckoos or squirrels, or something even ruder.
“This also showed me yet again that our diversity and collective love of democracy are what make our country strong and our nation great.”
Again, that same disconnect. How does a terrorist attack show that our diversity makes our country strong and our nation great? I think that the only think it shows is a failure to fully anticipate the terrorist attack. A weakness in our intelligence is not the mark of a strong nation.
This Trudeau is so intellectually impoverished that he doesn’t even realize that his words are nothing but a babble of buzz words, devoid of meaning.
gravenimage says
Excellent analysis, billybob.
davej says
“our diversity and collective love of Democracy”
Islam does not love Democracy, in fact it hates it. I believe their phrase is “Democracy go to Hell”.
So doesn’t that tend to undermine your argument about the virtues of diversity, at least in their case?
gravenimage says
Very true, Dave.
Justin Waterhole says
“Diversity makes our country … fractured and will lead to civil war .. but my grand-kids won’t have to deal with it because they’ll be trust brats too.”
Eyes open says
What a dhimmi whit
carol says
Love it! Hope the phrase catches on.
Graham says
Orwellian babble from a globalist scumbag.
Peggy says
Diversity makes us strong….
Hmmmm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKDeyuM0-Og
If it wasn’t so tragic it would be funny.
No Fear says
Diversity today means a Caliphate tomorrow.
Dave de lA Rond says
Let’s not forget that Atlantic Canada , the region with the poorest and highest unemployment rate in Canada voted for Trudeau and his team .Harper and his team lost every seat . Now after these 3 provinces accepting 7000 Syrian refugees, these idiots are complaining that Their hospitals are full,Public housing unavailable for them and Schools over filled with new Muslim Students and their praying room..
mortimer says
A millionaire’s son who never served in the military is a powder puff. He knows nothing, he has no philosophy, he observes nothing, someone tells him what to think.
Jay Boo says
“It showed the world that Canada – (Fill in the blank) – will not be intimidated by hatred and violence”
The all use the same boilerplate speech along with the syrupy soundbite:
“(Islam is peace)”
Paul Clark says
My daughter-in-law is Canadian. She is a socialist. Her mother is a Muslim. She is not. She believes government should provide most of your needs and wants. She says that she believes in God, but can’t describe Him. She consistently belittles America, but doesn’t want to leave. Her daughter went to Cuba and got a tattoo in bold letters on her breast that read, ‘Revolution.’ She is here too and she doesn’t want to leave either. They are typical Canadian hypocrites. I want both of them to leave and the idiots that think like them, but they won’t . We are too nice to them and they are going to stay around and take advantage of us, just like the Muslims, Hellary and Bama do.
Carolyne says
I don’t think Hillary Clinton is a Muslim. IMO She just has a Muslim lover. Pillow talk is very influential.
gravenimage says
Sorry to hear about your family, Paul. This can’t make things easy for you.
Jimdandi says
Trudeau and Obama must have studied at the same school of lunacy.
Rob Porter says
Sergeant-at-arms, Kevin Vickers did NOT take down Zehaf-Bibeau, a Mountie by the name of Barrett did the primary damage that took down this Muslim savage. Unfortunately Vickers initially took all the praise, but the fact is that Barrett was almost certainly the one who finished off Zehaf-Bibeau with a bullet to the head. Only this week Barrett was finally recognized for his courage.
gravenimage says
Then kudos to Barrett, as well.
Cretius says
Trudeau is an ignorant fool and that makes him a national risk.
Islam is a fascist totalitarian political system that includes a religion of jihad, bigotry, intolerance, sexism and barbaric cultural practises. Muslims are their own worst enemies. They even kill each other! No one has to lie about Islam. Simply bear witness to the intolerance, bigotry and hatred spread by imams online. Muslims demand respect and rights that they deny to everyone else. This makes them unfit immigrants/refugees to modern western democracies.
Allowing such a poisonous political system/religion in is tantamount to committing national suicide.