• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Muslim former Conservative Party candidate says “Those who insult Islam must die”

Oct 14, 2016 11:20 am By Robert Spencer

“Mr Sadruddin said that his speeches did not incite hatred, there was no intention to promote violence and he had specifically said ‘our jihad will be non-violent.'”

Yes, the effort to conquer and Islamize Britain by non-violent means is going great. No need to change tactics now.

“A Conservative spokesman said: ‘He is no longer a member of the party.'”

Great, but he represents the wave of the future, thanks to policies the Conservative Party has implemented for years. It is already de facto illegal to insult Islam in Britain, as per Sharia blasphemy laws. Criminalization and application of the death penalty for the offense will come sooner than anyone imagines.

Britain is finished.

shah-sadruddin

“‘Those who insult Islam MUST DIE’, shocking undercover footage of former Tory candidate,” by Katie Mansfield, Express, October 13, 2016:

PEOPLE who insult Islam should be put to death, a former Conservative council candidate declared in a shocking rant due to be aired on TV tonight.

Mufti Shah Sadruddin, a senior Muslim scholar, made the comments in 2013 and they have now been uncovered by a new ITV documentary.

The documentary shows Mr Sadruddin, a leading religious figure in the Jamaat-e-Ulama UK, or Council of Muslim Scholars in the UK, and in the British Bangladeshi community, criticising atheists who he said had insulted Islam, in particular a Bangladeshi blogger.

Mr Sadruddin, who now runs the Al-Ashraaf Secondary School in Ilford, said: “He said: “He is a bastard, a traitor and a shameless person. Child of a hypocrite, he swore at my Prophet.

“This son of a bastard is challenging us!

“O’ Bangla’s scholars, O’ Bangla’s Muslims, wake up. No son of a bastard will remain alive after swearing at my Prophet!”

The comments were made at a rally held in the wake of the death of another Bangladeshi blogger Ahmed Rajib Haider, who made jokes about Islamic beliefs and took part in protests calling for the execution of convicted Islamist war criminals.

At similar rallies in Bangladesh at the time, Islamists were using the term ‘atheist’ to attack the secular government and the protesters.

Mr Sadruddin, the rector of a secondary school, ran for election as a Conservative councillor, portraying himself as liberal, tolerant and opposed to hatred.

He failed to win his seat in Newham in 2014’s local elections.

In a video filmed in the run-up to the Newham election, he said: “I believe in equality, in fairness, I believe in loving the human race and I hate to hate anybody.”

When approached by Exposuree [sic]: Islam’s Non-Believers, which airs on ITV tonight at 10.40pm, Mr Sadruddin said that his speeches did not incite hatred, there was no intention to promote violence and he had specifically said “our jihad will be non-violent”.

A Conservative spokesman said: “He is no longer a member of the party.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: blasphemy, Featured, free speech, Islamic supremacism, United Kingdom Tagged With: Conservative Party, Shah Sadruddin


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. ECAW says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 11:34 am

    “Britain is finished”

    Fairly ridiculous going on about it then isn’t it?

    • Robert Spencer says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 11:49 am

      Yes, no need to read Gibbon. We know the Roman Empire fell, so he should shut up, already.

      What is “fairly ridiculous” is your constant whining about my saying this instead of getting up and doing something to try to prove me wrong.

      • ECAW says

        Oct 14, 2016 at 12:15 pm

        So you’re doing history now. You must have the gift of time travel.

        And disagreeing with your nonsensical position is whining eh? I thought you didn’t like ad hominem attacks. I have pointed out how illogical it is to claim that Britain is finished while countries obviously in far worse shape are not. I suggest you need to show how France, Germany and Sweden are not also finished.

        • Robert Spencer says

          Oct 14, 2016 at 12:39 pm

          The fallacy in your claim is this: I’ve never said that France, Germany and Sweden are NOT finished, as you assume.

          Britain is a particularly regrettable case in that it has been the closest friend and ally of the US, and its fall will be felt most keenly. No one would be happier than I if I were proven wrong in predicting its imminent demise as a free society. Unfortunately, I do not think I will be.

        • Champ says

          Oct 14, 2016 at 1:06 pm

          ECAW wrote:

          “And disagreeing with your nonsensical position is whining eh?”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          For one thing, Robert’s position is NOT “nonsensical” …

          non·sen·si·cal
          adjective
          1. having no meaning; making no sense.

          On the contrary, Robert’s position makes *perfect* sense, whereas your remarks do not.

          Lastly, you ARE complaining about Robert in a petulant way, so yes, you are whining as well.

        • ECAW says

          Oct 14, 2016 at 1:07 pm

          This won’t do. I do not assume that you have said that France, Germany and Sweden are not finished. I know full well that you haven’t. It is quite reasonable to draw conclusions from a repeated actual assessment on one country and silence on others. Come out from the shadows and be explicit. What is your list of the countries that are finished?

          In your second paragraph you reveal your confused thinking on this subject. You talk of Britain’s fall as a future event and then of its imminent demise. Yet everywhere else you use the word “finished”. Finished is not a future state but a present one.

        • john spielman says

          Oct 14, 2016 at 6:49 pm

          of course Britain IS finished unless they rapidly begin to arrest these people who threaten death upon anyone who dares criticize their pedophile false prophet and Satanic god allah… and it would be good to have Robert Spencer speak to the UK parliament about the awful truth about fascist islam

        • Jay Boo says

          Oct 15, 2016 at 12:11 am

          There is still hope for Britain, however.

          The people of Britain did set an honorable example for the rest of dhimmified EU members with Brexit vote despite waves of threats from traitorous BBC and world-wide liberal MSM intimidation and “our own” uncouth US president Obama’s shameful patronizing threats.

    • Alia iacta est says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 2:08 am

      Ah, a logical positivist.

      “Britain is finished” is surely just a rhetorical lament emphasizing a downward spiral as in “Trump is finished” even though it is not yet the 8th of November.

      Some people hope neither country nor man is finished but exclaim their fears about the future.

      Religious people tell us about a crucified man who exclaimed “It is finished” and he was not yet dead -and apparently, postmortem, he arose from the dead. I do not believe that story but I am pointing out that the English language is not defined by something like Russell and Whitehead’s Principia Mathematica.

      “I am not voting on November the 8th” -how strange that I am using the present tense to describe an action (or inaction) that may or may not ever eventuate.

      • ECAW says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 10:09 am

        Not just a downward spiral but an irreversible downward spiral. There is no fear for the future in the word finished, only certainty, in which case I am sure you will spot the illogicality of berating the lost cause.

  2. Stephanie says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 11:38 am

    9:12, 61-66 ‘… Make no excuse (65 ‘… mocking’); you have disbelieved after you had believed.’
    http://www.quran4theworld.com/translations/Hilali/9_61-90.htm

    ➡️killer, http://quran.com/4/89 ‘… kill them wherever ye find them’

  3. Charli Main says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 11:40 am

    If I had the drawing skills, I would create a picture of seated Britania wearing a burka and holding a spear topped by a star and crescent instead of her trident.
    I would then post it in every, pub, club and toilet in Britain.
    As its said, a picture is worth a thousand words. Perhaps, that would get through to the slumbering masses in Britain.

    • Alia iacta est says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:02 am

      Drawing skills are not required. You could download an image of an old British copper
      penny coin and I think you’ll find an image of Britannia on the obverse. So then you
      photoshop etc.

      Is Britannia meant to be the same personage as the famous woman Celtic warrior
      Boudicaa (sometimes you see the spelling Boadicea) who fought against the Roman
      takeover of Britain? I can’t remember. Anyway you could use either or both.

      There’s that wonderful sculpture in London of Boadicea in her chariot with the horses leaping in the air. Was it she that made a mockery of the Pax Romana?:

      “They have turned our country into a desert and they call it Peace”.

      Has a modern ring to it …Islam the Religion of Peace has come to Britain and where the Romans set up their citadels the muslims are setting up their mosques. Where the Romans set up in Londinium and turned the Thames into a sewer the muslims have set up the Great London Mosque and now Britain is awash with the sewage of their ideology.

      • Anne Smith says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 12:11 pm

        Perhaps someone should cover the statue of Boudicca with a burka. The resultant publicity might draw a bit of attention to the problem!

    • billdeserthills says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 3:02 am

      I had a design made for me at a mall once. It is lil’ calvin with a star of david and he is peeing on a swastika, I had that design put on a bunch of shirts and it didn’t cost much. I’m sure they would help
      with your design at a t-shirt design place

  4. Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 11:40 am

    This fellow is doctrinally … peculiar. When he ran for public office, he said, “I believe in equality, in fairness, I believe in loving the human race and I hate to hate anybody.” Equality between Muslims and kafirs? Allah and Muhammad (pbuh) don’t believe in such equality. Even his deprecation is suspiciously liberal: “No son of a bastard will remain alive after swearing at my Prophet!” This applies to very few people. What percentage of the population are the son of a bastard? That’s almost as rare as being the seventh son of a seventh son. Why does he exempt almost every Prophet-insulter from execution?

    • Sheykh Yer Weeni says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 6:13 pm

      Mark Spahn, what this Muslim means is that anyone who insults Muhammad is a bastard, and deserves to die. “Son of a bastard” is like “son of a bitch”. I am not surprised at this Muslim’s duplicity; Muslims will lie, cheat, and do everything (except, I think, blaspheme) to dominate the world. The grand scheme of Islam is unfolding in manifold ways.

      For any Muslim reading this: I am the Infidel Imam, and I will swear at your pedophile “prophet” right now. He was not the “perfect man” for anyone but his delinquent, deluded disciples. Muhammad was even worse than a Kafir, because he “covered” a little girl.

      Muhammad indeed had sex with Aisha when she was 9 years old. This is the testimony of both Sahih Muslim and Sahih al-Bukhari, and many other Islamic texts. Abundant evidence can be found here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/muhammads-sex-life.aspx
      Therefore the “prophet” Muhammad was nothing more than a filthy, perverted child rapist. He was a pedophile, an insult to manhood. Indeed, I, the Infidel Imam, am sometimes ashamed to be in the same gender as putrid pedophiles like the “prophet” of Islam.

      In civilized countries, we put men like Muhammad in the worst prisons, but you in the Ummah, being deceived, put him on a pedestal and call him the “perfect man”. Therefore Islam is and always will be a failure: its fruit is rotten, because its root was rotten. Muhammad: may his monument be a place for slaughtering swine, and his name become a curse. Better still, may Muhammad be forgotten. I have spoken.

      • Mark says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 4:12 am

        ” I am not surprised at this Muslim’s duplicity; Muslims will lie, cheat, and do everything (except, I think, blaspheme) to dominate the world. ”

        They even blaspheme. A number of times they have burned Qur’an pages to set infidels, or produced false cartoons to stir up riots.

  5. Ali Bey says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    Ask him if a Muslim who insults Christianity must be also put to death.

    • Karen says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 8:54 pm

      Great question!

  6. Mubarak says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 12:16 pm

    Once again:
    The insults are done by Islam and the Muslims themselves the main victims, if they could but see it.

  7. Angemon says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 12:43 pm

    When approached by Exposuree [sic]: Islam’s Non-Believers, which airs on ITV tonight at 10.40pm, Mr Sadruddin said that his speeches did not incite hatred, there was no intention to promote violence and he had specifically said “our jihad will be non-violent”.

    Yes, just because he was saying “O’ Bangla’s scholars, O’ Bangla’s Muslims, wake up. No son of a bastard will remain alive after swearing at my Prophet!” it doesn’t mean he was inciting hatred or promoting violence. I mean, who ever heard of muslims killing people for “insulting” muhammad?… / sarc. off

  8. Crusades Were Right! says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 12:49 pm

    Hey, Mufti Shah Sadruddin, did you know that your fake prophet was a liar, murderer, bandit, rapist, pervert and much more? Arguably the WORST human being who ever lived (assuming he wasn’t just made up).

    And kindly p*ss off back to your own backward country, there’s a good chap.

  9. Richie says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    Imagine if it was someone who said those who don’t worship Jesus must die. They’d likely lose their career, be arrested etc. But a Muslim calling for death for non Muslims seems untouchable

  10. John Marst says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    “No son of a bastard will remain alive after swearing at my Prophet!”

    Well, have you had a close look lately at the psychotic Allah and your “prophet,” the twisted and morally bankrupt Muhammad?

    You remember, the pedophile and serial killer, who endorsed sex slavery because he was a sex addict, who believed at one point (correctly) that he was possessed by a demon, who said Satan pees in your ears, farts loudly when he hears the call to prayer, sleeps in your nose, and warned that black dogs were devils.

    You mean this genius?

    • Crusades Were Right! says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 1:26 pm

      Let me guess – you’re a fan of David Wood!

      (Me too!)

      • John Marst says

        Oct 14, 2016 at 1:29 pm

        Love David Wood! Great sense of humor, and very informative.

      • Champ says

        Oct 16, 2016 at 2:42 am

        “Let me guess – you’re a fan of David Wood!”

        ~~~~~~~~~~~

        Me, three!! 🙂

  11. Keys says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 1:25 pm

    At least two things concern me in this article for Great Britain.

    1. Whether or not this hateful rant is aired or not, calling for the death of someone is a higher degree of hate speech than insulting someone. Since insulting Islam is a crime, calling publically for someone’s death ought to be a more grievous crime.

    2. As JW readers know, even telling the truth about Islam can be considered to be an insult to Muslims. If this British law, then, forbids telling the truth about Islam (as it apparently does since Robert Spencer is banned for that very thing), the horrors of Islam are forever surpressed in Britian. Unless that changes, indeed, Britain as a free Western democracy is finished.

    At least one two other things not in the article will hasten Britains demise as a democracy, IMHO.
    1. The current Muslim birthrate there compared to native and non-muslim birthrates.
    2. The continued insanity of muslim immigration to Britain.

    Unless these things change, what are the arguments that Britain will not fall as a Western democracy, and what reason is there to believe that those conditions can and will occur?

    Otherwise, Britain is finished, indeed; the questions are: how quickly; what do its allies (and NATO) do to prepare for another Islamic state aligned with other jihadic muslim states; and finally what about Britainistan nukes?

    There is no reason I am aware of to think this will get better. Well, maybe Brexit?

  12. davej says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 1:35 pm

    It is ironic and telling that the religion most deserving of criticism and mockery is the only one that forbids it. On pain of death, yet. Same with the free choice to leave a religion – as far as I know Islam is the only one that prescribes murder for apostates. It just demonstrates that under Islam there is no free choice, no free speech and no intellectual inquiry, only the poverty of totalitarianism.

    Individual Muslims, the vast majority of whom did not join Islam but suffered the bad luck to be born into it, deserve our pity and sympathy. The ideology that holds them in chains while threatening the rest of the world – this is the true enemy.

    Instead of accommodating it we should be offering education and support to any individuals who challenge it. But this would require first recognizing the malign nature and negative influence on society of what is clearly a barbaric death cult.

    • Joe Jones says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 1:56 pm

      Absolutely, and couldn’t agree more.

    • Keys says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 3:08 pm

      Well said, davej.

  13. jayell says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 1:50 pm

    So what does this pillar of the establishment, Sadruddin, teach in his ‘educational establishment’ in Hainault Street, Ilford, Essex (actually part of London)? Here’s part of the material that is easily available on the internet:-

    “Al-Ashraaf was established in September 2012. The aim of the madrasah is to provide learning and training opportunities for Brothers and Sisters over the age of 14 within an islamic environment. Not only do we want to develop the islamic personality in our students so that they will be able to apply the Quran & sunnah in their daily lives, but also work for the cause of deen in the UK.

    Our vision for establishing Al-ASHRAAF is to develop Islamic learning, ethos and create an atmosphere in the madrasah that will positively influence the characteristics of thought, etiquettes and mannerisms of the students so they may make a positive contribution to society.”

    Now, what does Mr. Sadruddin say about someone who clearly doesn’t quite agree with him?

    “He is a bastard, a traitor and a shameless person. Child of a hypocrite, he swore at my Prophet.
    This son of a bastard is challenging us! O’ Bangla’s scholars, O’ Bangla’s Muslims, wake up. No son of a bastard will remain alive after swearing at my Prophet!”……

    And, no doubt, this represents the “characteristics of thought, etiquettes and mannerisms of the students so they may make a positive contribution to society” that Sadruddin talks about in his school’s mission statement? Whose ‘society’ is he actually talking about? Because the foul-mouthed garbage he is quoted as spouting doesn’t have much resonance with the “characteristics of thought, etiquettes and mannerisms” of the BRITISH society in which I grew up, and most certainly would not have informed the attitudes and behaviour of the good people of Hainault Street, Ilford up until about 20-30 years ago when Ilford was actually a nice place to be.

    Sadruddin is clearly guilty of gross hate speech and incitement to murder. What are the police going to do about it? Look at the school website, from which I got the quote. Look at the pictures. Seems quite nice, doesn’t it? Where’s the money coming from to fund that establishment? If any of it comes from the local authority (the London Borough of Redbridge), do THEY know what’s going on here? Seems like there are more than a few issues here that we ought to be thinking about.

    • Karen says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 9:05 pm

      Wonderful post. Every paragraph a gem. I truely hope someone in your former town researches the money trail and asks questions.

      • jayell says

        Oct 15, 2016 at 1:53 am

        Karen, this is my PRESENT town!!!! If I find out that any of my council tax money is being spent.on propping up that ‘school’ or going into the pocket of the ‘paragon if ideological virtue’ featured in this story, I’ll be having words with some people…

  14. davej says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 2:00 pm

    At this point the fundamental question in Britain should be “Why are some people free to make frequent and specific death threats – while others, who happen to be the natives, may not utter a word of protest, draw a cartoon or make a joke?

    Something has gone very wrong in the home of free speech.

  15. ChristianIndeed says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 2:59 pm

    “Exposuree: Islam’s Non-Believers, which airs on ITV tonight at 10.40pm”; I can find no mention of this is tonight’s prog. guide, has it been pulled?

    Btw, anyone who thinks Britain is ‘finished’ is doing us a severe and unwarranted injustice and I for one feel insulted!

    To be continued…

    • ChristianIndeed says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 3:16 pm

      All the while there is breath, Britain WILL NOT BE FINISHED!
      Should things go the way RS assumes (admittedly, the way matters *appear* to be going ?), it will still NOT be finished.

      Was almost every country in Europe *finished* after being invaded in WW2? No, they all rose again from the ashes!

      It will be interesting to see who, if anyone, comes to the aid of Britain if/when we should fall to the Islamic onslaught.

      • Keys says

        Oct 14, 2016 at 3:45 pm

        If that happens, Britain will not be the preparation stage for the invasion of the enemy, it will be the invasion site like France in WW2, I am guessing.

        • jayell says

          Oct 16, 2016 at 2:14 am

          The problem was ignorance. I believe that we all thought that Islam was just another ‘nice’ religion and that imams were just vicars without the collar back-to-front who would give us tea on the lawn and help your mother-in-law out of her motor car, and we’ve got to be NICE to these people as we were a bit naughty with our Empire and they’re such jolly food chaps (‘noble savage’,’you’re a better man than I’ and all that!). Well, now we’re getting to know these people at close quarters it’s becoming obvious that perhaps it would have been better NOT to know these people at close quarters, and that Islam isn’t a religion as we know it, Jim, (apologies to Star Trek), and it’s ‘vicars’ (sic) wouldn’t have a lawn because they couldn’t invent.a lawnmower.in Saudi.Arabia and certainly wouldn’t offer a filthy kuffar a cup of tea, and they’d probably rape your mother-in-law before she could even open her motor car door. So we’re coming to the sad conclusion that they’re not such ‘jolly food chaps’ after all because ‘savages’ are by definition NOT ‘noble’ and they are decidedly NOT ‘better men than us’! Empire or no Empire. And, for my part, this realisation is largely due to none other than Dr. Spencer, who deserves honorary British citizenship after Brexit, assuming the stupid b*stards (I got THAT word from.an imam) over here actually let him in and assuming that there’s actually any United Kingdom left as we know it (Jim). Don’t worry, there will be.

    • Keys says

      Oct 14, 2016 at 3:42 pm

      ChristianInDeed-
      How is it an injustice and an insult to have an opinion based upon what is happening in GB about the direction Britain is heading?

      Granted, I can’t know everything that is happening there, so there may be many things occurring there to give us welcome hope for the outcome. I thought Brexit might be one. I know banning Robert Spencer is not one – that is an ominous sign.

      Obviuosly, that some think “Britain is finished” has “struck a nerve” in you. Good, I say. You need a Churchill type to fight them on the streets, fight them in the government, fight them in the media, ….., because they are not coming, they are already there. My country (USA) needs the same.

      Nothing will change there (or here) now without some discomfort; many nerves need to be struck.

      I do/did not intend to insult you, but speakly frankly. I have long admired the Brits for more than their resolve. Now I see a resolve in your government and mine, to integrate that which, at a certain point, can not be integrated.

      Curious to know if that program that was to air has been pulled, and why. Islamic pressure – offensive to muslims who did not leave. If it has been pulled, it goes as more evidence for making the case that Britain is finished.

  16. No Fear says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Diversity today means a Caliphate tomorrow.

  17. common sense says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 6:15 pm

    Shared on my FB. Insulting Christianity and letting Obama get away with blaming the crusades for atrocities is somehow acceptable as the Obama bots nod their empty heads “oh yeah ok yeah that’s right mmm yup good stuff” without knowing a thing about the crusades.

    “One nation under God” is somehow offensive and not permissible. Desecration of the bible and mocking Jesus as art is somehow acceptable and we forgive and look past it as we pray.

    Islam is an insult to everyone born into it, subjugated to it and most definitely is the most flawed longest running stain of oppression, intimidation and death in human history. They prove time and time again that Islam has no tolerance.
    I hope everyone reads all the comments on my shared post let alone the article itself. Fatigued and most definitely finished.

  18. Mark A says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 7:04 pm

    Good thing this guy wasn’t elected to Parliament.

    Can you imagine him spouting this rubbish in the House of Commons with Parliamentary immunity on his statements?

    Clearly the UK Conservative Party needs to vet its potential candidates more energetically.

  19. David says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 7:19 pm

    These insane muslim must all be smeared with pig feces and fed a diet of PORK!
    I’m so very sick of their NAZI like slogans.
    “The future does not belong to those who would slander the (NOT A) prophet mo ham’s head”.
    It’s ALL just bull shit! And coming from Obama’s muslim ass kissing lips, pretty disgusting too.
    I will be so very glad when that TRAITOR is in Prison!

  20. AformerMuslim says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 7:42 pm

    This man is not saying something strange. In Islam, the punishment for criticising Muhammad or his religion is death.

    Islamic Sharia law calls for this punishment in various books of Law.

    For example,

    Ibn Taymiyyah, Sarim Al Mwsool (p.4) ‘Whosoever abuses the Prophet [Muhammad] or finds his fauls then Kill him.’

    Therefore, we shouldn’t be surprised when any Muslim promotes the killing of those who insult Muhammad.

    Compare Muhammad with Jesus, who was insulted and even killed by people, yet he never ordered his followers to ‘kill those who insult me or my religion. Instead, he said, ‘Father forgive them.’

    A Former Muslim
    http://www.aformermuslim.com

  21. Imagine a world without Islam says

    Oct 14, 2016 at 8:07 pm

    We must dare to imagine living in countries that are free of Islam.

    We must not only defeat the theology of Islam, which is irredeemably bad, we must politically defeat those political parties and ideologies that apologise for Islam, appease it, or enable it.

  22. tgusa says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 3:26 am

    Idiot western leadership and their minions are stuck on coping with violent jihad when in actuality non violent jihad is much more pernicious and goes relatively unnoticed. The west is being yelled at regarding their intentions but our leadership refuses to hear.

  23. Marc says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 10:56 am

    “The Quran and hadith are still books of errors and violence. Sperm comes from the spine…the earth is egg shaped….Muhammad split the moon…the sun sets in a pond…the embryo is formed from a clot of blood… The stars are hot pebbles…Slay idolators..kill apostates …Stone adulterers to death or lash them …cut the hand of thieves…terrorize the unbelievers ….beat rebellious wives….confine and starve promiscuous wives to death….As well as the old testament adaptations in the quran(story of noah..adam..moses etc)
    The quran should be taken as what it is…an illustration of man’s thinking in the mideaval times” Anonymous

  24. Marc says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 11:00 am

    “Muhammad is a narcissist, a pedophile, a mass murderer,
    a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman
    a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter.”

    Former Muslim Ali Sina offered $50,000 to anyone
    who could prove this wrong based on Islamic texts.

    The reward has gone unclaimed.

    • Jake says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 11:29 am

      Unfortunately, you’ve said enough in a public forum to justify your own murder by these creatures. Who said we are not at war with major portions of Islam?

    • eur says

      Oct 15, 2016 at 2:08 pm

      during the Franco dictatorship in Spain his wife used to go to jewelers and take the bests jewelry. She left without pay saying that they would sent the bill to the palace … of course no one claimed. That meant they were gifts? … Colloquially she was known as the necklaces and jewelers if they knew she was coming to town hid the best pieces. No one claimed because people were terrified … with Islam is the same. Even non-Muslims in Muslim-majority societies do not claim …. because they are terrified and many suffer from Stockholm syndrome.

  25. Jake says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 11:22 am

    What a surprise! A two faced Muslim politician. In our country, you don’t have to be Muslim to be a two faced to be a politician. Usually though, these politicians are not talking about inciting the murder of those speaking ill of them. A pity that Britain has given up on the death penalty because its presence makes a difference. We here hope to be around for the executions of the Boston marathon bomber as well as major Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter. I really believe that the presence of this penalty sets the correct context for conversations about people who commit and suborn jihad murder.

  26. Manny says

    Oct 15, 2016 at 5:26 pm

    “PEOPLE who insult Islam should be put to death”

    And there is your religion of peace. What a joke.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Mojdeh on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.