Where is Alisyn Camerota’s concern for Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?
Who is standing in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?
(Thanks to Pamela Geller for the video.)
Agustinus Daniel says
STUPID..STUPID…STUPID… Doesn’t she know that wearing hijab is a POLITICAL STATEMENT?
Just like someone who wear NAZI symbol or KU KLUX KLAN mask, anybody who wear a hijab express a statement that SHE LOVES SHARIA and WILL SUPPORT any attempt to implement the sharia!!!!!
eur says
She is an ignorant.
Christianblood says
eur
She is more than ignorant. She is in bed with the jihadists!
Angemon says
Well, in that case, you should hand over all evidence you have of her being in bed with jihadis to law enforcement, as well as making it public online. I mean, you’re not just saying it for the sake of it, right? You have actual evidence that unequivocally shows her motivations and desires, right?
Tommy says
She should get some nice FGM done…
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Of course she is. All of the enemedia are.
She left Fox so as to have more ‘face-time’. Tho’ with that face…
Steven Polk says
Why is evidence needed here? The lady in the segment spoke of one jerk spitting on her and then broadened it to they? Did she call the police make a report she had been assaulted? Now her choices and that’s what they are choices, freedom of religion, are causing her problems. Now it’s everyone else’s responsibility to make her personal choices okay ?
What about the jerk that spit on her ? If he gets enough people to say that’s the right thing, will that make it right?
Real McCoy says
Why don’t she try her pant on her head tied with her bra.lol
JawsV says
Blondie Alisyn is a moron.
gravenimage says
It has nothing to do with her being blonde–Pamela Geller is blonde, and she isn’t like this.
mogilb says
She’s more than ignorant; she’s demented!
CrossWare says
Exactly! It is a symbol of showing the middle finger to the host society, that they will never assimilate.
Gary says
To which I will reply:
I will never, EVER, submit to their false moon god.
john spielman says
liberalism/ multiculturalism is a degenerative brain disorder that left in checked by reality leads to this type of behavior!
if she really understood what she is implying, then she wound volunteer to be cliterctomized and move to Saudi Arabia or Iran and be a house slave
john spielman says
oops that should read “left UN CHECKED…”
Rick Spencer says
‘Unchecked’ is ONE word, John!
Jim says
She is a slave to the fatal liberal disease called political correctness. It scrambles their brains and lose touch with reality. She would be a number one candidate for sharia law.
June says
Send her to a muslim country for awhile she can report from there first hand on being spat on, rammed with trolleys, harassed, followed, verbally abused and being constantly under surveillance.
Depending on which country she goes to will determine whether she is still alive to be picked up in a few months.
In some muslim countries she wouldn’t get out of the airport alive because she has advertised to everyone that she doesn’t value herself for who she is, but instead has chosen to grovel.
Wearing a head scarf won’t save her because they will know she’s not one of them.
The most racist (they have a separate racial war going on inside islam as to who are the most pious muslims) judgemental, violent people on earth who kill just because they hate you for not being muslim.
Jon says
We dont have to dress like muslims. Actually this country was founded on christianity. God is Lord of this nation.
CJ says
Jon: Maybe you need to go back to history class? America was not founded on Christianity, but rather for religious freedom. Whether The Church of England, Catholics, Jewish or others or no religion was the reason people came here. FREEDOM, not Christianity.
Here is good site to refresh your memory of the class you slept through.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/
Angemon says
CJ posted:
“America was not founded on Christianity, but rather for religious freedom. Whether The Church of England, Catholics, Jewish or others or no religion was the reason people came here. FREEDOM, not Christianity. ”
From your link:
John316 says
The founding fathers of America were Christians. America as a nation was founded upon Christian ideas, principles and culture. The vast majority of the population in America also identifies as Christian.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2007/09/the_judeochristian_values_of_a.html
More…
Proof That America Was Founded As A Christian Nation
America was founded on three documents: The Declaration of Independence; The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783, and the Constitution. These documents give conclusive proof that America is a Christian nation. One does not need a law degree or a degree in history to grasp this truth. It is obvious to anyone who does not have an agenda. Let us review the documents and show this proof.
Declaration of Independence,
The Declaration has many references to God throughout the document. The most famous one is that men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.
“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”
Here are more references to God found in the document:
Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”
Appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World”
With a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence”
The Constitution:
The body of the Constitution makes no reference to God. The Constitution honors the Christian Sabbath. The President was given 10 days to sign a bill into law. The counting of the 10 days does not include the Sabbath. This is found in Article 1, Section 7, and Clause 2 which in part follows:
“If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law,”
When the Constitution was completed on September 17, 1787, it was signed by the delegates then to be ratified by the states. The delegates signed the Constitution in the “Year of our Lord.” This is a direct reference to Christianity. This is found in Article 7 which in part follows:
“Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names, GO WASHINGTON–Presidt. and deputy from Virginia”
The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783:
The Paris Peace Treaty was the document which formally ended the Revolution and granted the United States independence from Great Britain. In a real sense, the United States formally became a nation on September 3, 1783.
When the United States became a nation, it was done in the “name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.” The preamble to this Treat states it is based upon the “Holy and undivided Trinity.” The concept of the holy Trinity is unique to Christianity. This statement means the United States was founded on the Christian faith. The complete Preamble follows:
“In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity”
The Treaty then ends just like the Constitution with a statement it is being signed in the “Year of our Lord.” The witnesses representing the United States were John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and D. Hartley. The section in part follows:
“In witness whereof we the undersigned, their ministers plenipotentiary, have in their name and in virtue of our full powers, signed with our hands the present definitive treaty and caused the seals of our arms to be affixed thereto.Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three”
D. HARTLEY
JOHN ADAMS
B. FRANKLIN
JOHN JAY
When this concept is applied to the Declaration of Independence, it is clear the reference to “All men are created equal,” was about the holy Trinity. The people of the United States are endowed by their Creator, the holy Trinity, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
The God of the Bible is whom the United States is based upon. The unalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness come from the Judeo/Christian God and no one else. He is the Rock of our Republic.
Patrick says
I think it’s time to shut CNN off
Time to take them off the air
They aren’t 50/50 they are bias towards real Americans an the consitution an the laws the laws state no habib’s because they cover your face just like a hoddie so they can’t wear them get it shut down CNN boycott cnn
Jimmy says
Perhaps the libtard doesn’t understand that one of Islam subjugate women forcing them into sexual slavery.
Jack Pierce says
I wish statements like yours could go directly to her.
Real McCoy says
Alisyn Camerota, Why don’t You try first headscarves on your head if you don’t have one try your pant on your head and tide with your bra. lol
carol says
It also lends the smug illusion of nun-like virtue to their often dependent female roles (assigned to them by males still mentally living in unpoliced 7th century societies). I have no doubt pleasing these male “benefactors” is the real reason for its appeal. SURELY there’s no danger from sexual attack due to inflamed lust at the sight of their hairlines?
A matching accessory might be a metal chastity-belt with matching silky covering and a big padlock at the side signalling ‘VIRTUE’.
LELAND E SMITH says
The scarf should be over your mouth not your head
ALAN says
AS SANTA WOULD SAY ::: JOJOJOJOJOJOJO
Alexis says
I figured this would be brought up sooner or later. Liberals are so predictable.
Charles says
This woman, like so many other brainless liberals, is TOTALLY NUTZ!
Christianblood says
My anger and frustration is directed more at people like the American government who are letting thousands of muslims into the US each month and people like this
“Alisyn Camerota” who is calling on Americans to wear hijabs in support of islamic jihadists like this one at the university yesterday. Nothing could be done in stopping islamic jihadists as long as these politically-correct, establishment elites are seated at the driving seat of the Western world.
john spielman says
I agree with you
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“My anger and frustration is directed more at people like the American government”
Since *when*? You’ve made it very clear on numerous occasions you hate everyone in the West equally and you wish us to be murdered by muslims.
Oh, I get it – you’re toning it down a notch because you were reprehended by site staff over your recent anti-semitic comments.
““Alisyn Camerota” who is calling on Americans to wear hijabs in support of islamic jihadists like this one at the university yesterday.”
Exactly at which time-mark in the video she says that?
Christianblood says
Angemon posted
(..Exactly at which time-mark in the video she says that?..)
Isn’t that where their discussion is going at the end? Also, remember that I did not post the article or the video so your question should be better addressed to the people who posted them. I understand that you are an establishment plant and it bothers you to see anyone exposing the politically-correct establishment agenda and that is why you are pissed off!
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“Isn’t that where their discussion is going at the end?”
Are you watching the same video as me? Please quote the exact words.
“Also, remember that I did not post the article or the video so your question should be better addressed to the people who posted them.”
You are saying that Alisyn Camerota is “calling on Americans to wear hijabs in support of islamic jihadists like this one at the university yesterday”. You, not the person in the video. Since you’re ascribing her a motivation, I am asking you about the motivation you’re ascribing her.
“I understand that you are an establishment plant”
Ah, so questioning your little narrative makes me an “establishment plant” – just goes to show how degenerate your process of understanding he world around you is. You can’t back what you said so fling an accusation and hope it sticks – never mind my hundreds, if not thousands, of posts trashing the establishment, I asked you to back what you said about an anchor supporting jihadis, therefore I’m an “establishment plant”. Time to question your narrative again: can you point to a post of mine defending the establishment?
“and it bothers you to see anyone exposing the politically-correct establishment agenda and that is why you are pissed off!”
Pissed off? Far from it. I’m actually enjoying to see you squirm. You flung an accusation for which you can provide no evidence for, got called on it and now you’re flinging another accusation for which you can provide no evidence for.
Do you know who, by virtue of his actions, could rightfully be called an “establishment plant”? It is you, thanks to your recent support for Jimmy Carter. That’s exactly how I would expect a pro-islamic establishment plant to act.
gravenimage says
Alisyn Camerota is a clueless idiot, no doubt–but no, saying she is “calling on Americans to wear hijabs in support of islamic jihadists like this one at the university yesterday” is not the case–where did “Christianblood” get this?
How is making an obviously false claim “exposing the politically-correct establishment agenda”?
It is not.
Alisyn Camerota is exposing herself as a fool–lying about her is not necessary.
eduardo odraude says
Multiculturalism in general is a good thing. The problem is the idiotic variety of multiculturalism that thinks even totalitarian cultures bent on destroying multiculturalism should have a place. Why should a force that seeks to destroy the “rainbow” be considered one of the colors? But that’s what Alysin is helping along.
Instead of telling leftists that their beloved multiculturalism is wrong, we should point out that Islam will gradually destroy multiculturalism and substitute a monoculture. Then we might actually enlist a few leftish Islam-critics, which we need a lot more of if we are to succeed in containing Islam and Islamization.
Demsci says
Eduardo, very well Saïd,
But now that very democratic tolerant ideology should be organised and touted and thoroughly compared wint both Islam’s texts and provable “bad” interpretations of them by hundreds of millions.
They, the two, ideologies, should be juxtaposed and. maybe even Beautiful Alysin Will eventually see that the one or the other ideology wins at the cost of the other.
and that the young Muslima supports an ideology that is detrimental for much of what Alisyn stands for. And that that is an accountable choice of the Muslima. as an ideological competitor. Religion is not like a race, it is a choice. And Alisyn can’t have it both ways, protecting these Muslima’s AND the values of her own mindset.
thelastvirgingoat says
I think unfortunately being a Muslim for a lot of them is not a choice and leaving Islam can have negative if not dire consequences.
eduardo odraude says
Islam is a choice. The cost of leaving it may be so great (losing one’s life) that one says “one has no choice about staying a Muslim” but that is not literally true. The choice a Muslim has might be between frying pan and fire, but it is a choice. It certainly is not a race. Therefore the law must develop in such a way as to hold the Muslim community accountable for abandoning the totalitarian core of Islam.
Carolyne says
Sorry, I don’t think that multi-culturalism is ever a good thing. Humans, being what we are, tend to stick to our own cultures and personally, I think it has worked very well in the US until we were betrayed by our government. If a country is filled with numerous groups which have nothing in common with the host country, how is that a good thing? And as is the case with Muslims, they will never assimilate with the nature culture. Under what circumstances can that be a good thing?
The elite can keep their multiculturalism and globalization.
Know Thy Enemy says
I too agree with you, Eduardo. There are some far-right wingers who are against all immigration. Some are open to immigration but only from European countries. Lately these guys have been taking advantage of people’s Islam aversion and tricking them into joining their alt-right*, or sometimes outright pro-Nazi, movements.
IMO such positions are unreasonable, damaging to society, and will keep our anti-Islam efforts from advancing. A fairly significant percentage of the western population is Hispanic, Asian, and south-Asian. Many are Jews and non-Muslim Arabs. And their numbers are growing [somewhat] faster than whites. There is no way we will succeed against Islam without their support.
*Note: I subscribe to Ben Shapiro’s definition of Alt-right. He explained it as follows:
“Basically, the alt-right is a group of thinkers who believe that Western civilization is inseparable from European ethnicity—which is racist, obviously. It’s people who believe that if Western civilization were to take in too many people of different colors and different ethnicities and different religions, then that would necessarily involve the interior collapse of Western civilization. As you may notice, this has nothing to do with the Constitution. It has nothing to do with the Declaration of Independence. It has nothing to do actually with Western civilization. The whole principle of Western civilization is that anybody can involve himself or herself in civilized values. That’s not what the alt-right believes—at least its leading thinkers, people like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor and Vox Day. Those kind of folks will openly acknowledge that this is their thought process.“
eduardo odraude says
Not sure about Shapiro’s definition of the Alt-right. Milo disagrees persuasively. He thinks the Alt-right (except for a small number of them) doesn’t care about race, but cares only about making fun of and breaking rules about speech — including some of the speech rules about race. I find Milo and Shapiro both interesting and impressive, and I know little about the alt-Right, so I don’t know which definition is correct. I’m rather suspicious of the claims that the alt-Right is racist, since the left now calls everyone and everything it disagrees with racist. When they stop calling me racist for being strongly allergic to the totalitarian ideology of Islam, I’ll start taking their racism claims more seriously. Shapiro might be right about the alt-Right, but check out Milo on the question.
john American says
Ben Shapiro is wrong, and not for the first time
Know Thy Enemy says
@john and eduardo
You can disagree with Shapiro regarding the definition of “alt-right”, but there really is this movement of white identity taking roots in the west including in the US. Whether one calls it “alt-right” or something else is not important. What is important is for people to realize that this movement, unless rejected, is going to harm the country in the long run.
I must point out that I do not hold it against whites for getting attracted towards white-identity forces. Over the last few decades there has been fairly intense hostility towards whites and Christians, and the Obama years have been the worse. Unfortunately the non-whites and non-Christians have not protested against the Left for their anti-white, anti-Christian attitude, and playing divisive politics. So naturally the desperate whites would join the only forces standing up for them, those representing white identity.
The problem however, with whites joining such identity groups is that they end up playing perfectly for the Left. The Left loves to divide people. They will say “See we told ya whites are racists and bigots.” Their narrative only becomes stronger.
Now before anyone says that labels like ‘racist’ and ‘bigot’ no longer have an effect, I beg to differ. Donald Trump’s win is giving people the false impression that the Left has lost its weapons. It has not! Trump won because of many factors that worked together and most of these factors have little to do with Left’s smear-words losing their potency. Also, if there is anything that I have learnt about the Left [from studying/observing them over the last few years], it is that not only they are well organized, they are also very determined! They will be working very hard to undermine the conservatives. Also, they think long term and are good at killing by thousand cuts. And they have tons of resources to accomplish all that.
Bottomline: It is downright foolish to play games that the Left are masters at. Whites need to stay away from identity politics or else you will lose for sure [within years, not decades]. It is instead much better to think long-term and focus on propagating conservative ideas (to everyone, irrespective of race of ethnicity) so that Republicans can win again and again. Whatever antics the Left plays, should be used to undermine them. This is the only way to [eventually] defeat them.
gravenimage says
Know Thy Enemy, I don’t believe that opposing Jihad is “racist”, nor need one be white to do so.
There are white supremacists, but they are a pretty small group, and rightly pretty marginalized. Characterizing all Trump voters as white supremacists is something the far Left is doing–I do not believe it is accurate.
Know Thy Enemy says
@gravenimage,
Did I indicate anywhere that opposing Jihad is racist, or that only whites can oppose jihad. My comment is about the growing white identity movement, and how unless rejected, is going to harm Republicans and conservatives.
“Characterizing all Trump voters as white supremacists is something the far Left is doing–I do not believe it is accurate.”
I know it is not accurate. I am trying to show what the Left is doing and how the white-identity supporters may be taking the bait. The Leftists aren’t simply calling Trump voters “white supremacists”, they also are painting the entire Republican Party as that of racists and bigots. Sun Tzu said “Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.” The Left has clearly read that quote and are practicing it quite well. They purposely characterize Trump voters as “white supremacists”, and purposely advertise the likes of Richard Spencer (and his organization) all over the media so that every single white in the country comes to know of him. A few join him, or other white-identity groups and in doing so, only end up helping the Left’s narrative.
By doing all this, the Left is trying to win first (in accordance with Sun Tzu’s teaching). Then in the 2020 elections all they have to do is tell people “You have seen what kind of racists and bigots the Republicans are. Don’t vote for them. Vote for us.” And they will win.
We need to be careful of the Left’s games and not play into their hands. One way to do this is to completely stay away from white-identity politics.
PJG says
I agree, Carolyne. Islam is the worst aspect of multiculturalism but we are still bowing down to other groups and letting them get away with crime and contempt for us in order to “respect diversity”.
gravenimage says
“Christianblood” wrote:
My anger and frustration is directed more at people like the American government who are letting thousands of muslims into the US each month and people like this
…………………………………..
Well, of course it is. “Christianblood” has always made it cleat that he hates Americans *far* more than he does Jihadists.
Jaladhi says
If she had any brains and we were in doubt, now she herself cleared it up – she is just as brain dead as her colleagues at CNN.
Tom Thumb says
The events at OSU yesterday show that Trump is correct in being suspicious of anybody who belongs to this death cult
Cecilia Ellis says
Alison Camerato is the mother of twin daughters, born in 2007. Given that, perhaps Alison might also want to recommend a Child-marriage Solidarity Day. After all, nine-year-olds satisfy Islamic requirements. Perhaps, instead, Alisyn could sponsor an FGM Solidarity Day or a How to Cover Up Face Bruising from Beatings Solidarity Day. So many opportunities … so little time …
eur says
She can also suggest to her husband marries a teenager and she happens to be the old wife, take care of the progeny of the male, the housework … and occasionally receive some wipe than another.
PRCS says
Not an endless list, but, yes, certainly many opportunities.
Samer Ibrahim says
Indeed, The prohet of Islam was not wrong when he said : “Women are in short of reason and religion”. This saying applies, of course, not all women, but to women like Alisy Camerota. This saying applies also to some men and not only to some women.
gravenimage says
Someone with a Muslim name quoting the “Prophet” of Islam and smearing the lack of intelligence of women? Who ever would have guessed it? sarc/off
Of course, many men are just as big dhimmis as the witless Alisyn Camerota.
eduardo odraude says
I guess she is nothing but a half pretty face. Definitely an ignoramus. And she’ll just keep digging herself deeper. And why does she have to customize the spelling of her first name? Because that is the only way to individualize her brand: her mind is a dime a dozen.
Muhammad affirms that those who do not follow him will be slaughtered
LINK: Page 222 (326 in the Arabic) of the earliest Muslim biography of Muhammad:
Quoting Islam
Don Davenport says
Dear Alisyn, take that rag and wipe your progressive azz.
Christianblood says
Over 100.000 Christians are being murdered and killed Each year for their Christian faith (check it out below) mainly by the followers of islam and the American and Western establishment elites (who support and love muslims) like Alisyn Camerota wont raise a finger to help these Christians in any way or speak out on their behalf and yet they they have the guts to speak lies about unfounded “harassment” of hijab-wearing islamic women in the West. This IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/06/02/vatican-spokesman-claims-100000-christians-killed-annually-because-faith.html
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“Over 100.000 Christians are being murdered and killed Each year for their Christian faith (check it out below) ”
That is the Vatican saying so. Don’t you routinely demonize the Vatican and the Pope? Anyway, that list includes Christians killed by shiites – how do you reconcile your “outrage” with your repeated defence of shiite muslims and shiite islam? Because I remember you telling me I would not find examples of Christians being killed by shiite muslims.
Christianblood says
Agnemon posted
(..That is the Vatican saying so. Don’t you routinely demonize the Vatican and the Pope?..)
I do criticize the Catholic establishment for their pro-islamic moves but still I will agree with them where they are speaking the truth like in the article above. On the other hand, I remember challenging you to show me a Shiite muslim group, blowing up a Christian church or beheading masses of Christians in the beaches like the US and Western-backed Salafi jihadists do all around the globe almost every single day and you couldn’t provide me a single example of this and my challenge stands. The fact is while the Shiite regime of Iran, which is was BTW made in America, (see the article below) is antisemitic and troublesome it is the Sunni/Salafi/Wahabi jihadists who are murdering hundreds of people every day all around the globe including hundreds of Shiites they murder every week.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36431160
Angemon says
Christianblood posted:
“I do criticize the Catholic establishment for their pro-islamic moves but still I will agree with them where they are speaking the truth like in the article above.”
What metric do you use to establish when they’re speaking the truth or not? Is it simply that whatever supports your argument du jour is true and what goes against it is not?
“On the other hand, I remember challenging you to show me a Shiite muslim group, blowing up a Christian church or beheading masses of Christians in the beaches like the US and Western-backed Salafi jihadists do all around the globe almost every single day and you couldn’t provide me a single example of this and my challenge stands.”
I have given you shiite terror groups. I’ve pointed out how the Iranian government persecutes Christians and other religious minorities, shutting down churches and going after Christians praying in their himes. That you refuse to acknowledge that and instead insist that shiites can do no wrong is not my responsibility.
“The fact is while the Shiite regime of Iran, which is was BTW made in America”
Nope. The Iranian Revolution, like many other anti-American movements, was back by the KGB. Khomeini outsmarted the Soviet spies and Iranian communists and went from being a “fellow traveller” to rounding them up and having them shot.
“ (see the article below)”
You mean the very same article that doesn’t say what you claim it does, like I’ve demonstrated on several occasions?
“is antisemitic and troublesome”
So are you. Did you not recently accused Israel of being allied with ISIS?
“it is the Sunni/Salafi/Wahabi jihadists who are murdering hundreds of people every day all around the globe including hundreds of Shiites they murder every week.”
Yes, yes, I get it – you are enamoured with shiite muslims. A troll from the country that gave us pogroms, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and refuseniks is supporting a branch of islam whose exponent on Earth is a government that routinely states their desire to nuke Israel, the only safe haven for Christians in the entire Middle East? Well, imagine my surprise…
P.S.:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/11/pakistan-top-shia-cleric-arrested-for-involvement-in-targeted-killings-of-sunni-clerics
And there goes your little narrative – again…
gravenimage says
More apologia for Shia savagery. Shi’ites hate Infidels and seek their destruction just as do Sunnis. Their creed is no different.
And this poster has made the claim before that the Mullahs were “made in America”, basing this on Carter’s saying that he was open to dealing with them.
Where to start? Surely even this poster grasps that the Islamic Republic of Iran is *Islamic*, which has nothing to do with America? Moreover, few Americans agreed with this dhimmitude, and Carter was, in fact, voted out right after this, largely due to his weak response to the Iranian hostage crisis.
Then, he is actually a supporter of dhimmi, antisemetic Carter, as he makes clear on this thread:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/11/jimmy-carter-wants-un-to-impose-a-palestinian-state-by-fiat-with-us-recognition
Ciudadano says
“Americans should wear headscarves in solidarity with Muslims”
Sure, when Muslim wear on crosses in solidarity with 344 million christian persecuted in islamic countries (http://tinyurl.com/hx6x7ef).
john spielman says
excellent reply!
Ernie says
!
PRCS says
Do “news” presenters ever ask Muslims to point out where hijab is required?
Has Muslim “reformer” Zhudi Jasser ever been asked? Uncle Nihad? Honest Ibe? CAIR lawyers? Sarsour, or any other snarling, “in your face” Muslim activist?
Or any of the many Muslim women who do not wear it?
Has Camerota ever bothered to research that herself?
scott says
Was she born stupid!
Angemon says
The bint that claims to have been spat at by someone in a car – if that really happened (and I wouldn’t bet a cent in it) it is indeed reprehensible, but compare that with what one of her coreligionists did yesterday: he drove a car into a crowd and tried to murder people with a machete. Where does she get the moral high-ground to talk about being afraid because of religious reasons? Also, later on, the bint talked about “racist, sexist, islamophobic comments” when characterizing Trump (without, of course, ever giving any examples) – she forgot “bigoted” and “xenophobic”, which are the usual smears aimed at Trump or anyone else who is critic of muslim immigration into Western nations.
Is it any wonder why CNN was singled out during the “f***ing firig squad” that was Trump’s meeting with media representatives?
http://nypost.com/2016/11/21/donald-trumps-media-summit-was-a-f-ing-firing-squad/
Lynne says
Where is the sympathy for the victims but of course this is CNN. How can people be so ignorant about Islam?
Peggy says
They can’t be ignorant, not any longer anyway.
Plenty of evidence of what Islam is all about and they are reporters so they get news before we get it.
I most definitely don’t give them the benefit of any doubt. They know at least as much as we do so when they defend Islam it’s not because of ignorance but solidarity with it.
Angemon says
“They know at least as much as we do so when they defend Islam it’s not because of ignorance but solidarity with it.”
Ah, another mind-reader.
Peggy says
Do you disagree with that statement and if you do please tell us what you think.
Don’t just hit and run. Explain why.
Angemon says
Peggy posted:
“Do you disagree with that statement and if you do please tell us what you think.
Don’t just hit and run. Explain why.”
Isn’t that obvious? Are you a mind reader? Do you know what people think? Do you know what they know or why they do what they do? Nice attempt to deflect, but it is *you* who owes an explanation here – explain why you know what others think and know, as well as what dictates their actions.
Peggy says
Ah, another stupid reply.
Angemon says
Peggy posted:
“Ah, another stupid reply.”
Indeed – exactly what I learned to expect from you. Well, stupid replies and insults.
Kay says
There are so many aspects of a person (not to mention a group of people), so it’s possible to “feel solidarity” over a certain perceived attribute but at the same time to be woefully ignorant of many other aspects and connotations and implications.
Brent says
Total raving idiot
David says
She better wear it all the time now. Because the moment she removes it– without changing her political stance– we can call her a hypocrite.
BG says
Maybe CNN’s Alisyn Camerota should subject herself to FGM in “solidarity” with all muslim women who are forced to undergo the barbaric practice…
That way she would come to know what islam is really about!
Richard Paulsen says
Takiyya. What have they escaped from? Islamic oppression? Demanding islam and islamic views. They must be very happy in their countries ruled according to islam, since there are no christians being able to disturb them there.
No reason to escape. Why escape to nations oppressing you? Spitting at you? Madness.
Bluffing, from the start to the end.Takiyya. CNN is mad.
Richard Paulsen says
Ha, ha, ha. She could as well say, let´s dress in Klu Klux Klan dresses, or naziuniforms, or as bolsheviks in solidarity.
I think she says so and he keeps quite, because they are well paid and better paid than most americans.
They say what their employer wants to hear. Quislings.
eduardo odraude says
Exactly. Oh, the poor Stalinists! the poor Nazis! the poor KKK! There might be a backlash against them after they went on a rampage! Besides, most of them are innocent. They can’t help it if they subscribe to a heinous ideology, can they? Besides, this is America! They have a right to believe in a murderous totalitarian ideology, even when members of their group keep acting on that violent impetus! To be fair, there were some innocent Stalinists and Nazis, for example children who did not know better, or idiots in the West who did not realize what those movements really meant. Likewise for Islam.
“Alisyn” knows zilch about Islamic history, except perhaps what she may have read from that whitewasher Karen Armstrong.
Richard Paulsen says
Quite so. The masquerade of decline.
Carolyne says
Why would any woman wish to wear a Hijab to be in “Solidarity” with murderers, child abusers, pedophiles, female child mutilators, wife beaters, limb amputators, gay killers, etc, etc, etc?
Does this ridiculous woman know that the purpose of a hijab is to identify Muslim women so that those not wearing one can be raped and sold into slavery? Does she know that the mere sight of a woman’s hair will throw a Muslim man into an uncontrollable sexual frenzy?
Does she know she is an idiot?
eduardo odraude says
She is too stupid to know that.
Peggy says
She knows all of it except the last one. She has no idea that she is an idiot.
gravenimage says
Yes–this is *exactly* what the Hijab is for.
Winston says
cnn
Arthur Simon says
Wait, hijabs to show solidarity with the Muslims? Not turbans to show solidarity with the Sikhs? Berets to show solidarity with the French? Mao jackets? Nehru shirts? Sombreros? Eagle-feather war bonnets?
Today’s snowflake Liberals would call that “Cultural appropriation”. Make up your mind!
Arthur Simon says
While we’re at it, why not go all the way and raise the ISIS flag over the Capitol Building?
Ever notice that tolerance, carried to an extreme, can’t be discerned from surrender?
PRCS says
Well, as an alternative to raising it over the Capitol Building, I’m sure CNN’s management would permit her to have a small one on her desk.
Sesse says
And what should americans that support the wounded and maybe killed by this muslim wear
Idiot !
Veka Fitzfrancis says
I guess no one told her that it wasn’t permissible for non-Muslims to wear Islamic garb under Sharia.
gravenimage says
Also true.
Alice says
In your dreams, Alisyn.
eduardo odraude says
Why didn’t she wear one on the show? Because she’s a superficial woman and her opinion is as superficial as she is.
Alicia Sinclair (@CJRyan7) says
This woman is a daftie.
No-I will NOT wear a headscarf, don a burka, refuse to drive or only go out with a male relative for my public beating.
I guess the likes of this woman are this thick, which makes them ideal ciphers for Islamic supremacy.
Parker says
This woman needs a reality check, how many Muslim women wear American clothes? Fire her or send her to a psychiatry facility
Crusades Were Right! says
Anagrams of “Alisyn Camerota”:
“Yo, cretin! Salaam!”
“Aye; Islam can rot!”
gravenimage says
+1
Stan Lee says
Camerota has discovered her best option to retain her job position. And that is to kiss up to anybody remotely resembling a booster of Islam. She never misses an opportunity to collude with the devil.
Robert_k says
I note how the CNN interviewer repeats the accusation “He spat at you”. This is a common psychological cue of a biased reporter especially found in those of the Left.
Michael says
CNN brainwashed her!
Sam says
“Americans should wear headscarves in solidarity with Muslims”
Why don’t we just commit a national suicide in solidarity with Muslims?
How more stupid can these liberals get?
I don’t want to do anything with Islam and its cult members let alone be in solidarity with them. Come on America what will it take to wake up to Islam?
Cretius says
CNN’s Alisyn Camerota – Another useful leftist idiot. Lazy or illiterate? The facts are out there for anyone with the will to learn.
Lenin-McCarthy says
I would go and tell that CNN reporter to go and fuck herself!
Carolyne says
Likely, she can’t get anyone else to. (I know that’s so pathetic.)
יונה לוי גרוסמן says
You showed there swastikas painted on the doors. Muslims actually like to draw swastikas on the doors of Jewish homes.
Peggy says
That’s because they were allies with Nazis. I wish I could just wave a magic wand and make them all disappear.
Sharon says
HA! Like hell. It will be a cold day in hell before I stand in solidarity with anyone who likes to torture, beat, rape, behead, burn, and stone women. I refuse to EVER cover my head out of respect for something which I have no respect.
John doe says
Idiots like her are ignorant. They support the burka not knowing what it represents. Send her to Iraq or afghaniatan, and I would to see if she comes back with a different mindset.
Peggy says
This woman is too stupid to realize that once the pond is drained she will have no place to spew her rubbish from.
Do idiots like her really think that they can carry on like this forever?
I firmly believe in the saying “you can do whatever you want but not for as long as you want”.
Kelly Allen says
She should should be fired for making such a statement. this is America last and you clearly aren’t like one. stupid stupid stupid
davej says
So they can wear all forms of Arabic dress (including the identity-concealing niqab), build mosques that blare out the obnoxious call to prayer 5x a day and collect benefits that we pay for, but in Muslim countries we would be assaulted for displaying a tiny cross or holding a bible?
Solidarity? No, that is called submission.
somehistory says
There have been times when people had their head shaved to help those cancer patients who had lost all of their hair, and women who have had their long hair cut in order to make wigs for those without hair due to losing it to cancer.
Those kinds of things show kindness and thoughtfulness.
Wearing a scarf because a moslim cuts down a bunch of innocent people at a party, or on a college campus, or in an office building, or on a military base, and moslims all over come out with the “oh poor us”…is just downright idiocy.
Non-thinking, but attention-grabbing people like this one wearing a scarf…
just to say, “How wonderful am I,”….hoping she will be praised for her kindness and thoughtfulness.
And it makes it harder for those women who might like wearing scarves to protect their hair from the wind or rain or as a *fashion* statement….how does it make them feel if they don’t wish to support moslims in their slavery and subjugation of the rest of us? Will the fact they are wearing a scarf be viewed as supporting it?
davej says
Yes, the Liberal impulse seems to be primarily about “look how tolerant, humble and wonderful I am”. It is a blatant play for attention lacking in any reason or common sense, a self aggrandizing gesture that manages to avoid all serious discussion of the underlying issue.
Tolerating intolerance is not a virtue, it is suicidal self-deception. Performed by figures in the media it becomes a siren song leading the masses to eventual elimination.
Ravi Nair says
And slit throats in solidarity? By the way who owns CNN now? Who funds it? Think jihadi groups are trying to control media now.
De Ingraham says
I wonder why any woman would want to wear the headdress that signifies subjugation. If the young woman does not wear it now because of fear then obviously she’s not holding her faith above all else. No woman who actually follows the true tenants of Islam would take it off in public. Fear or no fear.
As to Allyson, the fact she is not Muslim and was not raised so, shows a pandering and an overreach of trying to be “inclusive”. A woman who’s not been raised in that religion /theocracy might want to think twice about aligning herself with one that subjugates women, & abuses women, children and animals.
TJFreedomjihad says
Clearly she fails the well-known, infamous, medical flashlight test, wherein one can look through her earhole, and note CAVU (ceiling and visibility unlimited) clear through the other side, wherein one can note the flashlight shining brightly, through the other earhole!!! AKA she is a no-brainer. Has she ever heard of books, homework, learning, etc., about one’s enemy, and I call one an enemy that is commanded by the written gang ideology, to murder, amputate and torture, rape, whip and stone, all who are not members and believers in said gang of muslims, who make war and murder and enslave all others, and often each other as well!!!
Perhaps it may or ought be said that liberals, leftists, certainly progressives, radicals, socialists of any stripe, commies, and alinskyites in general fail this test.
jbt1844 says
How about wearing crosses in solidarity with Christians?
davej says
The primary reasons for wearing headgear are to mark them as obedient to Allah and to protect them from the Muslim males who would otherwise regard them as rape fodder – the same way they look at Western women. The idea that non-Muslims will have to do the same in self defense is sad and depressing.
Thomas F Mills says
What complete Bull S— these Bimbos are spreading. I voted as every one I know for Donald J Trump but he isn’t changing my thought. He will save us from these filthy
muslims who don’t belong to a legitimate religeon that want their fashest Movement want to control the world. Forget the phony religeon bit , the ones here should isimulate into our culture, follow our laws,quite their terrorism. Then they may be treated with a small bit of respect. In the end islam will totally fail as people want to beleave what they want not being forced to worship a punk like mohamed’s so called
Religeon . Mr Trump will protect us from these slime.
SweetOlBob says
SIGN IN CNN EMPLOYMENT OFFICE
Stupid, pro muslim, twats apply here.
Phil Copson says
Small point re common mistake: “brutalise” does not mean “to assault” – it means that the person on the receiving end has been become brutish, ie “the prisoners became brutalised due to the brutal treatment they received.”
gravenimage says
This is not a “mistake”, Phil–both definitions are correct:
bru·tal·ize
verb
past tense: brutalized; past participle: brutalized
attack (someone) in a savage and violent way.
“they brutalize and torture persons in their custody”
desensitize (someone) to the pain or suffering of others by exposing them to violent behavior or situations.
“he had been brutalized in prison and became cynical”
FYI says
She should wear a burqa and move to Saudi Arabia and maybe seal her mouth with duct tape.
I hear they are looking for Female Drivers in Sod land.
Sand Road Truckers.
She really needs to move there.It’s a great place for women, the islamic paradise of Soddy.
I hear women are treated the same as men there.Churches and Synagogues are aplenty.
Satan told me….
Jimdandi says
Maybe she should start the fad by wearing a headscarf herself and putting on some dark makeup. How stupid can you be?
Lea Buschesa says
Americans should ware headscarfs to show solidarity with Muslims?? This woman should go to live in a Muslimstate, so she would “feel at home!” For sure she will find a job by one of the TV stations….
So good luck miss “Amerabia”!!!
Brandee says
As a Christian that is against my beliefs and won’t happen. Period. Secondly when you come to America, you become American. America does not become your beliefs. You are free to practice your religion. That’s all. If you don’t want this abuse then become vocal about protecting your home America against those of your faith that want to harm us because we as AMERICANS can’t tell the good from the bad and there are sleeper Muslims who won’t be happy till AMERICANS are dead.because we belive different. So l9ok to your religion first before you expect us to just conform to such an extreme, non peaceful, non tolerant religion that is not what America was founded on. Go back to your country or become an American. PERIOD.
Atheist Kaffur says
I expect to see Mrs Camerota in a head scarf everyday in the studio outside on the street or else she is islamophobic. She has to eat her own words.
Kay says
She clearly doesn’t yet understand that the Mohammeden scarf is not accompanied by the same freedoms that accompany Western scarves worn for fashion or warmth and which can be doffed or donned moment by moment.
Richard Courtemanche says
Unfortunate for this lady. There’s no easy solution but Islamist extremists are out there acting up and they should be the ones primarily concerned about the consequences of their actions which they won’t because Jihad is the ultimate objective at any cost.
That's PRESIDENT Trump to you! says
She works for CNN. That alone proves she’s an idiot. Revoke her citizenship. Her ridiculously bad commen shows she supports the islamic takeover of the U.S.!
C Hock says
Colossal Moron. That is all.
Susette says
I never, ever, EVER will wear a hijab. I don’t feel any solidarity whatsoever for islam. I’m glad she removed it. Now maybe she can assimilate. “Alisyn” is an idiot to even suggest that as a journalist. But, she obviously comes from a degraded gene pool. Her parents couldn’t even spell her name.
sidney penny says
Goodness me her hair is showing and that is NOT allowed when you wear a hijab.
sidney penny says
Does CNN have a ” narrow-minded way of thinking” ?
What would CNN say to Dr Ann Aly?
“I don’t wear it,” she said (Dr Aly is a Muslim).
see what Dr Aly says at the end
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/australia-muslim-university-research-explains-that-theres-nothing-islamic-about-beheading-women-have-equal-rights-in-islam
“Dr Aly described Sharia Law as “guidelines for life” which can and do exist in some places, alongside regular law enforcement processes.
These guidelines are a way of life to live by which cover things like, rules around how divorce can take place, such as a husband must ask for a divorce three times and it cannot be asked for in anger.
In terms of covering women’s bodies, she said that this came from the Koran, which talks about women being modest.
“The idea is that you cover your modesty but what’s interpreted as modesty is different, some cover their hair with a hijab, some extend that to their face and hands,” Dr Aly said.
“Others have the more modern look and wear tight clothes and tight jeans and wear a scarf over their head,” she said.
“Some think modesty is more about your demeanour and that’s how I interpret it.
“I don’t wear it,” she said (Dr Aly is a Muslim).
She said she has often been told that she “can’t be a Muslim”.
“They say: ‘you can’t be a Muslim, you don’t believe in subjugation’ or ‘if you were a Muslim you would wear a head scarf’” which she described as a narrow-minded way of thinking.”
UNCLE VLADDI says
Hypocrisy is the hallmark of ALL criminals and also accounts for 100% of “mental illnesses!”
LIBERAL MOTIVATION: “You’re all out to get me so I’m gonna get you first! And THAT means I have to join the biggest, scariest gang I can find! After all, if we don’t let the violent criminals have their way with us, they’ll just have their way with us anyway!”
Criminals are masochists – always trying to control their fears, BY causing those very same, worst-case scenario problems which cause the pains they fear the most. They believe that, because predation is possible, it is also inevitable (and, in the case of the muslim version, condoned by their god). If you commit a crime and get away with it, then, since god allowed you to commit it, it was never really a crime after all anyway.
CAPISCE?
?
In fact to all such libertine “liberal” criminals, there are no real “crimes” nor any “criminals” at all, ever, anyway, simply because we’re are really ever only helpless VICTIMS: of magical mysterious predetermined and predestined inevitable forces such as “society” (/mere products of our environments, or as Marx put it, of “Historical Predeterminism”) and of course to their muslim brethren, as proudly helpless “slaves of allah!”
So gangster extortion and the endless alibis for excusing it known collectively as “victimology” will always go hand in hand!
Socialists are gangsters.
Fascists are gangsters.
Muslims are gangsters.
This should be obvious to everyone, criminals included, by now!
gravenimage says
CNN’s Alisyn Camerota: Americans should wear headscarves in solidarity with Muslims
……………………
Suicidal insanity.
Peggy says
I don’t see her wearing one. She should lead by example.
gravenimage says
Here’s more from this idiot:
“CNN’s Alisyn Camerota attacks Pamela Geller”
http://www.wbdaily.com/national/cnns-alisyn-camerota-attacks-pamela-geller/
Aoife says
CNN’s Alisyn Camerota: Americans should wear headscarves in solidarity with Muslims..
Alisyn Camerota, you are a FKNG JOKE.
firefox says
I really am having a hard time coming to grips with these MSM people simply being just “stupid beyond belief”. I mean when the election was on I thought they were paid to be like that, but this is a real special level of stupid – that’s “some dumb dhimmi dumb” and deserving of a prize, …or maybe therapy, …electro-shock!?
David Peoria says
Will she submit to female circumcision in solidarity?
Mindy Robinson says
I stand in solidarity with Yeshua and America, both of whom islam have declared as enemies.